Subject: [forces] Comments: draft-haleplidis-forces-packet-parallelization-01

From: Dave Hood <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 16:22:17 +0000

The use case for chunk processing is not obvious, and the references section does not obviously cite a place where such a use case might be described. An example would be helpful.

Some documentation of cilc (is that correct?) should also appear in the references.

In ParallelLFBType
<snip />
<component componentID="5">
<name>AllowedParallelAfters</name>
<synopsis>List of LFB Classes that this parallel LFB
class can follow in a parallel pipeline</synopsis>
<snip />
<component componentID="6">
<name>AllowedParallelBefores</name>
<synopsis>List of LFB Classes that this LFB class can
follow in a parallel pipeline</synopsis>
<snip />
Presumably the first synopsis should read precede, rather than follow?

Tunneling metadata in case of nested parallelization: this would presumably require the complex metadata proposed in draft-haleplidis-forces-model-extension-01? ... which therefore should also be cited in the text and listed in the references. Would a tunneledMetadata typedef be needed?

Dave