From nobody Thu Apr 9 13:46:02 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C5551B3232; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 13:45:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.912 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sQMv5gMnxGD0; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 13:45:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55DC01B3238; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 13:44:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 4776418046C; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 13:43:58 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 6000:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20150409204358.4776418046C@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 13:43:58 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, hipsec@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [Hipsec] RFC 7401 on Host Identity Protocol Version 2 (HIPv2) X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 20:45:52 -0000 A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 7401 Title: Host Identity Protocol Version 2 (HIPv2) Author: R. Moskowitz, Ed., T. Heer, P. Jokela, T. Henderson Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: April 2015 Mailbox: rgm@labs.htt-consult.com, tobias.heer@belden.com, petri.jokela@nomadiclab.com, tomhend@u.washington.edu Pages: 128 Characters: 309319 Obsoletes: RFC 5201 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis-20.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7401 This document specifies the details of the Host Identity Protocol (HIP). HIP allows consenting hosts to securely establish and maintain shared IP-layer state, allowing separation of the identifier and locator roles of IP addresses, thereby enabling continuity of communications across IP address changes. HIP is based on a Diffie-Hellman key exchange, using public key identifiers from a new Host Identity namespace for mutual peer authentication. The protocol is designed to be resistant to denial-of-service (DoS) and man-in-the-middle (MitM) attacks. When used together with another suitable security protocol, such as the Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP), it provides integrity protection and optional encryption for upper-layer protocols, such as TCP and UDP. This document obsoletes RFC 5201 and addresses the concerns raised by the IESG, particularly that of crypto agility. It also incorporates lessons learned from the implementations of RFC 5201. This document is a product of the Host Identity Protocol Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC From nobody Thu Apr 9 13:46:09 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBED51B3274; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 13:46:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.912 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1kwxr12GZR3f; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 13:45:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC57E1B327B; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 13:44:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id B093518046D; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 13:44:06 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 6000:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20150409204406.B093518046D@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 13:44:06 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Cc: drafts-update-ref@iana.org, hipsec@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [Hipsec] RFC 7402 on Using the Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) Transport Format with the Host Identity Protocol (HIP) X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 20:46:04 -0000 A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 7402 Title: Using the Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) Transport Format with the Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Author: P. Jokela, R. Moskowitz, J. Melen Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: April 2015 Mailbox: petri.jokela@nomadiclab.com, rgm@labs.htt-consult.com, jan.melen@nomadiclab.com Pages: 40 Characters: 88644 Obsoletes: RFC 5202 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5202-bis-07.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7402 This memo specifies an Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) based mechanism for transmission of user data packets, to be used with the Host Identity Protocol (HIP). This document obsoletes RFC 5202. This document is a product of the Host Identity Protocol Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC From nobody Sat Apr 11 00:53:32 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13CEF1AD09A for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 14:59:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.912 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gXe_EzVLg16m for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 14:59:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F8F81AC42E for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 14:59:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 8971C18046B; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 14:58:54 -0700 (PDT) To: rgm@icsalabs.com, pekka.nikander@nomadiclab.com, petri.jokela@nomadiclab.com, thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com, brian@innovationslab.net, terry.manderson@icann.org, gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com X-PHP-Originating-Script: 6000:errata_mail_lib.php From: RFC Errata System Message-Id: <20150331215854.8971C18046B@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 14:58:54 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 00:53:31 -0700 Cc: hipsec@ietf.org, paul.hoffman@vpnc.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [Hipsec] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5201 (4319) X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 21:59:07 -0000 The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5201, "Host Identity Protocol". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5201&eid=4319 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Paul Hoffman Section: 3 Original Text ------------- HIP implementations MUST support the Rivest Shamir Adelman (RSA/SHA1) Corrected Text -------------- HIP implementations MUST support the Rivest Shamir Adleman (RSA/SHA1) Notes ----- Misspelling of one of the inventors' names. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5201 (draft-ietf-hip-base-10) -------------------------------------- Title : Host Identity Protocol Publication Date : April 2008 Author(s) : R. Moskowitz, P. Nikander, P. Jokela, Ed., T. Henderson Category : EXPERIMENTAL Source : Host Identity Protocol Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From nobody Sat Apr 11 00:53:33 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3C401A19FA for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 15:39:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.347 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HGqnOQQdCuoW for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 15:39:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43B941A19EF for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 15:39:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.20.30.101] (50-1-51-95.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.95]) (authenticated bits=0) by proper.com (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t2VMdP7n075922 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 31 Mar 2015 15:39:26 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org) X-Authentication-Warning: proper.com: Host 50-1-51-95.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.95] claimed to be [10.20.30.101] Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C5D8FBFD-7122-4A03-AB61-6910E5B113F4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5b6 From: Paul Hoffman In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 15:39:21 -0700 Message-Id: <500B06BA-B116-4D8A-A01A-CE4F65D55DDA@vpnc.org> References: <20150331220023.4E88618046C@rfc-editor.org> To: Terry Manderson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 00:53:31 -0700 Cc: "brian@innovationslab.net" , "pekka.nikander@nomadiclab.com" , "hipsec@ietf.org" , "rgm@icsalabs.com" , RFC Errata System Subject: Re: [Hipsec] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4423 (4320) X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 22:39:29 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_C5D8FBFD-7122-4A03-AB61-6910E5B113F4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Mar 31, 2015, at 3:15 PM, Terry Manderson = wrote: > Agreed that there is a misspelling/typographical error here, I don't = think > that this would cause an implementation issue in the HIP architecture. >=20 > Marking this as "hold for document update". Exactly right. It's trivial, but we just verified errata for it in another RFC, so I = thought for completeness... --Paul Hoffman --Apple-Mail=_C5D8FBFD-7122-4A03-AB61-6910E5B113F4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVGyIdAAoJEJz/fXByZmLZTTEIAJgCIhh1L0gLVw0F4vo2+agN jciEYNUAohSvcUAX7FAL9pXu7nwFKpT3KDR8/F4vxHTGKYSuVR5dAXF/eyQQWJyS a/+8WKh39o3jsS/+OKTqPcqIyFgnl6caZSmfsrZwp5T/VAKoItjWt1jcJ5ylH3xi tUnhxFlpA5MxyN8m4SrfEMq4WnsXDGk1Y9FM/mTl1uIDXEfID6rWkHt8FmW09ZJD OcBmX6y+IzA0UCvC6/KiMXj/EFvwr6V7zxgk2BY+oFzCxaA+1e4+HwbZIEYepVBg 5+dUSPOB1hs781ALoOS7ebvjptFPLTT8oN375xQrWLXUAwkF6/b8ZQgNKsXfyzU= =XcKG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_C5D8FBFD-7122-4A03-AB61-6910E5B113F4-- From nobody Mon Apr 13 00:39:40 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A1E31A1A75 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 00:39:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.302 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ud0nNfrnd2bq for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 00:39:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sesbmg22.ericsson.net (sesbmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E0AA1A1A6C for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 00:39:37 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-f79996d000006ebb-10-552b72b7d2cc Received: from ESESSHC016.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sesbmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 64.D7.28347.7B27B255; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 09:39:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [131.160.126.136] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.68) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.210.2; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 09:39:35 +0200 Message-ID: <552B72B6.6030405@ericsson.com> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:39:34 +0300 From: Gonzalo Camarillo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: HIP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrKJMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvje72Iu1Qgw23jCymLprM7MDosWTJ T6YAxigum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujI3fjjIX/GKuOParkaWBcTJzFyMHh4SAicT8uxFdjJxAppjE hXvr2boYuTiEBI4ySpx/1ckE4axllDh65iIbSBWvgLbEk5a5rCA2i4CqxOE/jYwgNpuAhcSW W/dZQGxRgSiJiV8PsUDUC0qcnPkEzBYRkJToubsUzBYWkJVY1PmKFeQIZgFNifW79EHCzALy EtvfzmEGsYWAVi1/1sIygZFvFpJJsxA6ZiHpWMDIvIpRtDi1OCk33chIL7UoM7m4OD9PLy+1 ZBMjMJwObvltsIPx5XPHQ4wCHIxKPLwPXmmFCrEmlhVX5h5ilOZgURLntTM+FCIkkJ5Ykpqd mlqQWhRfVJqTWnyIkYmDU6qB0V983dRHMSefWT1eccxjQUBlj/CtctuSP5NeuEq/fuPy63jV rfYJOuLOVxbt/K3cvGKWzsK6bMUVOg3yjlnno9M1TGNZpqqt+ctQk3bfVHLfzyWM1btcJy/2 bmY3WjV7ZbbrK2Ybu3qNE+en/GPpM7xR9M6wRLBKQ+vZ3C/eDdn5R73ft7xSUGIpzkg01GIu Kk4EAAx1uMAIAgAA Archived-At: Subject: [Hipsec] Next steps in the WG X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 07:39:39 -0000 Hi, with the publication of RFC 7401 and 7402 we have completed a publication batch. Now it is time to start working on the next one. These are the remaining WG items we have on our charter: http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/hip/documents/ Their respective authors, could you please send a status update to this list? We need to know the current status of all drafts, the next steps, and also important, whether you have enough energy to put into this work at this point. Thanks, Gonzalo From nobody Mon Apr 13 00:48:52 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25FFB1A7002 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 00:48:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.002 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AiZ-s6q0wj6N for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 00:48:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sesbmg22.ericsson.net (sesbmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EF911A1F70 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 00:48:49 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-f79996d000006ebb-3e-552b74df1362 Received: from ESESSHC018.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sesbmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id AD.79.28347.FD47B255; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 09:48:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.74) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.210.2; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 09:48:47 +0200 Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90AF251B30; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:52:31 +0300 (EEST) Received: from As-MacBook-Air.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 781B24FB6A; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:52:30 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <552B74DD.5080608@ericsson.com> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 00:48:45 -0700 From: =?windows-1252?Q?Ari_Ker=E4nen?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: , Gonzalo Camarillo References: <552B72B6.6030405@ericsson.com> In-Reply-To: <552B72B6.6030405@ericsson.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrLLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvje79Eu1Qg9edBhZTF01mdmD0WLLk J1MAYxSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJXxqZ7YgU/2StWTO1nbGBcydbFyMkhIWAi0fp9NTuELSZx4d56 oDgXh5DAUUaJe3Pb2CGcbYwSt36cY4Fw1jFKbDl6mhXCWcEo0brxClg/r4C2xN9DfUA2BweL gKrE9KO8IGE2AUeJ2w9fsoLYogIpEp+757BBlAtKnJz5hAWkXETAU+LFFl+QMLOAmsSyHzuZ QGxhAS2JpzeXMYPYQkDTm54+BotzCuhInL/1gRGklVnAXuLB1jKIVnmJ7W/nMEM8oyZx9dwm qFZViav/XjFOYBSZhWTxLITuWUi6FzAyr2IULU4tTspNNzLSSy3KTC4uzs/Ty0st2cQIDO+D W34b7GB8+dzxEKMAB6MSD++DV1qhQqyJZcWVuYcYpTlYlMR57YwPhQgJpCeWpGanphakFsUX leakFh9iZOLglGpglPRUupIwre+OLoPo/d9Gv62tFnxPvKNSIfgm6sutWdGMOqdapq1i6n6x XuDUvLqAXp7i8wcmq2SyOYewtQV9sziQdyHs8Z1yw7fF6f9MBPYzuBo21WhuviLE1r3WdG3E ssq3DucamcWZZO+5vtziWPjihXbY6RjdIJ7Ag59379J4Xzgh8eZZJZbijERDLeai4kQAG6+7 OlACAAA= Archived-At: Cc: Jan Melen Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Next steps in the WG X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 07:48:51 -0000 Hi Gonzalo, The Native NAT traversal draft was recently updated to align with updated 5203bis. Now the plan is to write some more text about the relaying details and post a new version when that's done. Then we could get some reviews and perhaps move to WGLC. Cheers, Ari On 13/04/15 00:39, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: > Hi, > > with the publication of RFC 7401 and 7402 we have completed a > publication batch. Now it is time to start working on the next one. > These are the remaining WG items we have on our charter: > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/hip/documents/ > > Their respective authors, could you please send a status update to this > list? We need to know the current status of all drafts, the next steps, > and also important, whether you have enough energy to put into this work > at this point. > > Thanks, > > Gonzalo > > _______________________________________________ > Hipsec mailing list > Hipsec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec > From nobody Mon Apr 13 05:01:35 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B3431ABD37 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 05:01:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B4nCwpYsH-k7 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 05:01:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [50.253.254.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A6B91ABD3A for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 05:01:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492AD5FA39 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:01:30 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at htt-consult.com Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id HdHka28rCJ-g for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:01:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lx120e.htt-consult.com (unknown [192.168.160.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 61DA45FA35 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:01:24 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <552BB009.5050103@htt-consult.com> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:01:13 -0400 From: Robert Moskowitz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: hipsec@ietf.org References: <552B72B6.6030405@ericsson.com> In-Reply-To: <552B72B6.6030405@ericsson.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Next steps in the WG X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 12:01:34 -0000 Miika and I are working to finish 4423-bis. Outside of the WG, Rene and I are working to finish HIP-DEX. I can submit this as an independent submission, or the workgroup can submit it. I should note that it is now being referenced by Zigbee (and IEEE 802.15.9), so I really have to finish it. Further outside, we finally have a draft for SSE: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-moskowitz-sse/ Including the IPR from my prior employer that insisted that I patent it and I insisted that it had to be freely available to the IETF. Of course SSE needs a KMP, and HIP is a logical choice. The SSE authors will be applying for a BOF at Prague. The mailing list for SSE is SIESTA. On 04/13/2015 03:39 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: > Hi, > > with the publication of RFC 7401 and 7402 we have completed a > publication batch. Now it is time to start working on the next one. > These are the remaining WG items we have on our charter: > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/hip/documents/ > > Their respective authors, could you please send a status update to this > list? We need to know the current status of all drafts, the next steps, > and also important, whether you have enough energy to put into this work > at this point. > > Thanks, > > Gonzalo > > _______________________________________________ > Hipsec mailing list > Hipsec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec > > From nobody Mon Apr 13 06:07:47 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7FDE1B2FA0 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 06:07:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.311 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AV57RYOzka3P for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 06:07:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.cs.hut.fi (mail.cs.hut.fi [130.233.192.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D89BF1B2F9F for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 06:07:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (mannerheim.cs.hut.fi [130.233.193.8]) by mail.cs.hut.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12D3C3089C5 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 16:07:42 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <552BBF9D.4030403@cs.hut.fi> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 16:07:41 +0300 From: Miika Komu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: hipsec@ietf.org References: <54B4137E.1040709@tomh.org> In-Reply-To: <54B4137E.1040709@tomh.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Hipsec] RFC5206-bis (mobility) status X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 13:07:47 -0000 Hi, Gonzalo asked to bring remaining issues to the list, so let's revive the discussion around the mobility extensions. On 01/12/2015 08:33 PM, Tom Henderson wrote: > I just published version 8 of RFC5206-bis (mobility), and version 5 of > the multihoming draft. These updates make the changes that were > discussed on the list in December; in summary, the updates were mainly > about moving additional material related to multihoming from the > RFC5206-bis draft to the multihoming draft. > > The next update I plan to make is to add a description of how UPDATEs > may be forwarded through rendezvous servers, to handle the double jump > mobility scenario. There isn't any discussion about what to do when > UPDATEs are not acknowledged, so I propose to suggest that, upon failure > of obtaining an ACK to an UPDATE from a peer, the host should try any > other addresses that it knows about, and if those also fail, try to send > the UPDATE to the peer's rendezvous server (if known). > > There were 13 open issues in the tracker against RFC5206-bis, but upon > review, many of them are multihoming questions, so I reassigned several > of them to the multihoming draft. Here are the issues against > RFC5206-bis that I see remaining. > > Issue 8: decouple locator announcement from SA creation > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/hip/trac/ticket/8 "Need to make sure that revised specifications handle the use case of decoupling locator announcements from SA creation (as well as the case of integrating them)" how? > Issue 9: some implementations lack some of the compulsory UPDATE > features, so maybe they should not be mandatory > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/hip/trac/ticket/9 "Note from Baris Boyvat that some mandatory UPDATE features in RFC5206 are not supported by implementations, so perhaps they should not be mandatory." hmm, what was this about? > Issue 12: sending UPDATE via rendezvous server (discussed above) > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/hip/trac/ticket/12 "Note: This tracker issue depends on Issue 1 that Julien filed for RFC 5204. At least one implementation supports this feature." this should fixed for double jump. And we should decide which document (mobility vs. rendezvous) to use describing mobility extensions. > Issue 15: suggestion for naming UPDATE packets > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/hip/trac/ticket/15 "From Baris Boyvat: "There is always three UPDATE packet sent for a mobility event. In HIPL this fact was not explicitly used in the implementation before, which made the implementation quite complex. I would suggest to explicitly quality the UPDATE packets numbers, etc. UPDATE1, UPDATE2, UPDATE3 which would in a way force people to think in that terms. Otherwise, when dealing with different UPDATE scenarios, SEQ, ACK handling, retransmissions,etc conceptualization become very difficult. Actually if possible, I would suggest to nicely separate these concepts so that they can be easily modularized in an implementation. I'm not sure, it's common for RFCs but this can be done in a "implementation recommendation" form." At least the packet renaming could be done easily. Related to this, I have also privately suggested Thomas to describe a simple state machine for mobility management. I have described the state machine a long time ago: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec/current/msg01745.html This could be also omitted if the authors do not have enough time, or included as an implementation note in the appendix. My biggest concern is that how can we make further UPDATE extensions possible (i.e. how to signal that that a host does not support a new extension X), while making the UPDATE procedure a bit more specific? > Issue 21: UPDATE signature and HI inclusion > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/hip/trac/ticket/21 I think we should definitely fix this issue. This is important especially with HIP-based firewalls and mobile hosts. And it is rather easy to fix. > Issue 23: Allow Locator fields to have flow bindings > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/hip/trac/ticket/23 "draft-cao-hiprg-flow-mobility-00 proposes to use RFC6089 flow bindings fields with HIP. Although the draft proposes a new locator type, we should consider to just extend the base LOCATOR to allow this." This should affect mainly the multihoming specification, right? From nobody Mon Apr 13 06:17:13 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C81F1A0041 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 06:17:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZFyam3PzFTPu for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 06:17:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.cs.hut.fi (mail.cs.hut.fi [130.233.192.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 938CF1A0063 for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 06:17:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (mannerheim.cs.hut.fi [130.233.193.8]) by mail.cs.hut.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC8A0308B31; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 16:17:06 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <552BC1D2.2090402@cs.hut.fi> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 16:17:06 +0300 From: Miika Komu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Hoffman , Terry Manderson References: <20150331220023.4E88618046C@rfc-editor.org> <500B06BA-B116-4D8A-A01A-CE4F65D55DDA@vpnc.org> In-Reply-To: <500B06BA-B116-4D8A-A01A-CE4F65D55DDA@vpnc.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Cc: "pekka.nikander@nomadiclab.com" , "hipsec@ietf.org" , "brian@innovationslab.net" , "rgm@icsalabs.com" , RFC Errata System Subject: Re: [Hipsec] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4423 (4320) X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 13:17:12 -0000 Hi, On 04/01/2015 01:39 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > On Mar 31, 2015, at 3:15 PM, Terry Manderson wrote: >> Agreed that there is a misspelling/typographical error here, I don't think >> that this would cause an implementation issue in the HIP architecture. >> >> Marking this as "hold for document update". > > Exactly right. > > It's trivial, but we just verified errata for it in another RFC, so I thought for completeness... I submitted a new version of draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis that fixes this, but it got stuck in tool because the affiliations of all the authors have changed and I could not verify the submission. I have contacted the secretariat to resolve this somehow manually. From nobody Mon Apr 13 09:21:40 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 413751A028A; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 09:21:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qS6el7xwKNWo; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 09:21:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F7721A037D; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 09:21:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.13.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20150413162134.22361.40409.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 09:21:34 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: hipsec@ietf.org Subject: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis-10.txt X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 16:21:38 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Host Identity Protocol Working Group of the IETF. Title : Host Identity Protocol Architecture Authors : Robert Moskowitz Miika Komu Filename : draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis-10.txt Pages : 39 Date : 2015-04-12 Abstract: This memo describes a new namespace, the Host Identity namespace, and a new protocol layer, the Host Identity Protocol, between the internetworking and transport layers. Herein are presented the basics of the current namespaces, their strengths and weaknesses, and how a new namespace will add completeness to them. The roles of this new namespace in the protocols are defined. This document obsoletes RFC 4423 and addresses the concerns raised by the IESG, particularly that of crypto agility. It incorporates lessons learned from the implementations of RFC 5201 and goes further to explain how HIP works as a secure signaling channel. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis-10 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis-10 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Mon Apr 13 10:00:53 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75CB51A09C9; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:00:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vA-t_GWwOAU0; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:00:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 980C61A0BE8; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:00:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.13.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20150413170049.15567.27982.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:00:49 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: hipsec@ietf.org Subject: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis-11.txt X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 17:00:51 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Host Identity Protocol Working Group of the IETF. Title : Host Identity Protocol Architecture Authors : Robert Moskowitz Miika Komu Filename : draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis-11.txt Pages : 39 Date : 2015-04-13 Abstract: This memo describes a new namespace, the Host Identity namespace, and a new protocol layer, the Host Identity Protocol, between the internetworking and transport layers. Herein are presented the basics of the current namespaces, their strengths and weaknesses, and how a new namespace will add completeness to them. The roles of this new namespace in the protocols are defined. This document obsoletes RFC 4423 and addresses the concerns raised by the IESG, particularly that of crypto agility. It incorporates lessons learned from the implementations of RFC 5201 and goes further to explain how HIP works as a secure signaling channel. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis-11 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis-11 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Mon Apr 13 23:15:44 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 939511B341C for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 23:15:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id niDQwduJthqV for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 23:15:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.cs.hut.fi (mail.cs.hut.fi [130.233.192.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EB4C1B341A for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 23:15:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (mannerheim.cs.hut.fi [130.233.193.8]) by mail.cs.hut.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29715308AF8; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 09:15:32 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <552CB083.6010505@cs.hut.fi> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 09:15:31 +0300 From: Miika Komu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Hoffman , Terry Manderson References: <20150331220023.4E88618046C@rfc-editor.org> <500B06BA-B116-4D8A-A01A-CE4F65D55DDA@vpnc.org> <552BC1D2.2090402@cs.hut.fi> In-Reply-To: <552BC1D2.2090402@cs.hut.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Cc: "hipsec@ietf.org" , "brian@innovationslab.net" , RFC Errata System Subject: Re: [Hipsec] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4423 (4320) X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 06:15:43 -0000 Hi, On 04/13/2015 04:17 PM, Miika Komu wrote: > Hi, > > On 04/01/2015 01:39 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote: >> On Mar 31, 2015, at 3:15 PM, Terry Manderson >> wrote: >>> Agreed that there is a misspelling/typographical error here, I don't >>> think >>> that this would cause an implementation issue in the HIP architecture. >>> >>> Marking this as "hold for document update". >> >> Exactly right. >> >> It's trivial, but we just verified errata for it in another RFC, so I >> thought for completeness... > > I submitted a new version of draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis that fixes this, > but it got stuck in tool because the affiliations of all the authors > have changed and I could not verify the submission. I have contacted the > secretariat to resolve this somehow manually. uploaded two versions that fix the mentioned issue: version 10: * fixed the RSA typo (the editorial errata reported) * updated references to base and esp specifications * added a reference to orchid specification in the text * changed my affiliation version 11: * changed Robert's affiliation (sorry, missed this in the first upload) https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiff&url2=draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis-10.txt https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiff&url2=draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis-11.txt From nobody Thu Apr 16 07:14:39 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AB611A87CB for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 07:14:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dxzRaLWwJeWr for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 07:14:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-la0-x236.google.com (mail-la0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2994F1A879F for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 07:14:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by laat2 with SMTP id t2so57779681laa.1 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 07:14:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=xL+sl2oJBdHCKd1u1G21jmg0kXo02gdgvCDGT7A8+8g=; b=Su6Moi7YXwOtkU5PnS6DypYiHheV2wUrNAI5ukCGI64Moh3puSK+fBNJwTVFVW7955 +K+UVarAtYfv2dPc9HDVQLQFu2hlMlTyQXIgCK2iGlTVAQklN6ZctBEXMOuzNn+91sQv 5X4EbRb8EPPO63TCtvLDZwBtpIWNFNBKFJFRRLOmd0mVvvU9UEtYkGuYPZDMmRFKw0L+ iC+y336B0w/KZz7upfsAIG7PUc8Rkl31d4PnDlw6Rme3HMor8jMOkrjpVVdw0mncUmRy YwuvvW3LHkBYXyP9xafdRXxhR0EnDAYThs+bx3XiFfFA8rQdrHsmVd/KxgCoNdnW2gZy k7Mg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.116.11 with SMTP id js11mr28886612lab.106.1429193674646; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 07:14:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.43.2 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Apr 2015 07:14:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <552B72B6.6030405@ericsson.com> References: <552B72B6.6030405@ericsson.com> Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 07:14:34 -0700 Message-ID: From: Julien Laganier To: Gonzalo Camarillo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Archived-At: Cc: HIP Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Next steps in the WG X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 14:14:38 -0000 Hi Gonzalo, >From my perspective 5203bis, 5204bis, and 5205bis are ready to move forward. 5203 bis has recently expired and I will be resubmitting a fresh version shortly that addresses a couple of outstanding nits that Ari pointed out earlier (Thanks Ari!) --julien On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:39 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: > Hi, > > with the publication of RFC 7401 and 7402 we have completed a > publication batch. Now it is time to start working on the next one. > These are the remaining WG items we have on our charter: > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/hip/documents/ > > Their respective authors, could you please send a status update to this > list? We need to know the current status of all drafts, the next steps, > and also important, whether you have enough energy to put into this work > at this point. > > Thanks, > > Gonzalo > > _______________________________________________ > Hipsec mailing list > Hipsec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec From nobody Fri Apr 17 03:45:34 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D2AE1B2AEE for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 03:45:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -104.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id buh110kICUs1 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 03:45:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sesbmg22.ericsson.net (sesbmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BC6D1B2AED for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 03:45:29 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-f79996d000006ebb-08-5530e447e4ca Received: from ESESSHC023.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sesbmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 0B.E8.28347.744E0355; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 12:45:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [131.160.126.163] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.89) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.210.2; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 12:45:27 +0200 Message-ID: <5530E447.7000308@ericsson.com> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:45:27 +0300 From: Gonzalo Camarillo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julien Laganier References: <552B72B6.6030405@ericsson.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrCLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvja7HE4NQg5vnOC2mLprMbPHl6DRm ByaPnbPusnssWfKTKYApissmJTUnsyy1SN8ugSvj9NdbLAUzuCu+fzzO1MDYzNnFyMkhIWAi 0fHlFTOELSZx4d56ti5GLg4hgaOMEv+3P2SEcNYySrS+v8QEUsUroC2x4e9CFhCbRUBVovfL ZLA4m4CFxJZb98HiogJREhO/HmKBqBeUODnzCZgtAtR7alIDmM0sICmxfNMvNhBbWEBL4unN ZWBXCAkUSOxddI4RxOYUCJQ4sH0RkM0BVK8psX6XPkSrvMT2t3OgyrUllj9rYZnAKDgLybZZ CB2zkHQsYGRexShanFqclJtuZKSXWpSZXFycn6eXl1qyiREYrAe3/DbYwfjyueMhRgEORiUe XoVMg1Ah1sSy4srcQ4zSHCxK4rx2xodChATSE0tSs1NTC1KL4otKc1KLDzEycXBKNTDyvO58 xKMVc+3OxWcxJz4u+fRwlhPT4ccujcmcVo2Xc8sPKwq/eFDTcsUlettORekCD9/z7DdEtc/K yYh6L7MJfGvwvVTkqMjJ//tV0qRzu35wsvpffPMsfJFHQmTZJBN/A/dI7k2bClOjbp0MW8Sy 5niv04u9oQezVZS3cqh1GAnv61Y/rqvEUpyRaKjFXFScCACxP3QhNwIAAA== Archived-At: Cc: HIP Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Next steps in the WG X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 10:45:32 -0000 Hi Julien, let's have these three drafts as our next batch. I am going to start WGLCs on 5204bis and 5205bis right away, and will WGLC 5203bis as well as soon as you submit the revision. Cheers, Gonzalo On 16/04/2015 5:14 PM, Julien Laganier wrote: > Hi Gonzalo, > > From my perspective 5203bis, 5204bis, and 5205bis are ready to move > forward. 5203 bis has recently expired and I will be resubmitting a > fresh version shortly that addresses a couple of outstanding nits that > Ari pointed out earlier > > (Thanks Ari!) > > --julien > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:39 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> with the publication of RFC 7401 and 7402 we have completed a >> publication batch. Now it is time to start working on the next one. >> These are the remaining WG items we have on our charter: >> >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/hip/documents/ >> >> Their respective authors, could you please send a status update to this >> list? We need to know the current status of all drafts, the next steps, >> and also important, whether you have enough energy to put into this work >> at this point. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Gonzalo >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Hipsec mailing list >> Hipsec@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec From nobody Fri Apr 17 03:47:08 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 543D61B2AF7 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 03:47:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -104.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iqVA3Lxu4a01 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 03:47:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net (sessmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B816F1B2AF5 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 03:47:06 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-f79a46d0000006b4-ef-5530e4a8469f Received: from ESESSHC013.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sessmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 51.9E.01716.8A4E0355; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 12:47:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [131.160.126.163] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.59) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.210.2; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 12:47:04 +0200 Message-ID: <5530E4A8.70300@ericsson.com> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:47:04 +0300 From: Gonzalo Camarillo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: HIP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrKJMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvje6KJwahBg8mWVpMXTSZ2YHRY8mS n0wBjFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGXefrGUseMhY0bLyP3sD40bGLkZODgkBE4lnO7exQ9hiEhfu rWfrYuTiEBI4yihxbP5jRghnLaPEzMlXgBwODl4BTYkNT2pAGlgEVCW+nXzICmKzCVhIbLl1 nwXEFhWIkpj49RCYzSsgKHFy5hMwW0RAUqLn7lIwWxhozPOpW8FGMgPZ63fpg4SZBeQltr+d wwxiCwloSyx/1sIygZFvFpJJsxA6ZiHpWMDIvIpRtDi1uDg33chYL7UoM7m4OD9PLy+1ZBMj MJwObvmtu4Nx9WvHQ4wCHIxKPLwKmQahQqyJZcWVuYcYpTlYlMR57YwPhQgJpCeWpGanphak FsUXleakFh9iZOLglGpgtEwL+vlNxFRBUXzCWb++nsLm559Cb3+Z5pZ1cbtT8LvXFo8Cj65q Ty6p91lzqpaDP4jpMNezU7VSNtdaRb7rKiaGLfPldLRlOrLy2brspo0pZqtig481TJu6Ys8C dgXe3P03zs7ltW65ukneJL3zAofwjrVRSxeK8r7xvMgy18V+7UO1q3cvK7EUZyQaajEXFScC APJL9WMIAgAA Archived-At: Subject: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 10:47:08 -0000 Hi, I would like to start a WGLC on the following draft. This WGLC will end on May 4th: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis/ Please, send your comments to this list. Thanks, Gonzalo From nobody Fri Apr 17 03:47:34 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 400241B2AFB for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 03:47:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -104.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CuhvFbCyMa4F for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 03:47:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net (sessmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91F5E1B2AF7 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 03:47:31 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-f79a46d0000006b4-5d-5530e4c11dc1 Received: from ESESSHC007.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sessmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 52.AE.01716.1C4E0355; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 12:47:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [131.160.126.163] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.210.2; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 12:47:29 +0200 Message-ID: <5530E4C1.8070509@ericsson.com> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:47:29 +0300 From: Gonzalo Camarillo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: HIP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrKJMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvje7BJwahBpOPmFtMXTSZ2YHRY8mS n0wBjFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGW2bTrAUPGSseDh3L0sD40bGLkZODgkBE4ltz/qZIWwxiQv3 1rN1MXJxCAkcZZS41TaFCcJZyyix8+FndpAqXgFtieO//7F2MXJwsAioSjR+SAAJswlYSGy5 dZ8FxBYViJKY+PUQC0S5oMTJmU/AbBEBSYmeu0vBbGEBTYm+VxuZQcYwA9nrd+mDhJkF5CW2 v50Ddo8Q0Kblz1pYJjDyzUIyaRZCxywkHQsYmVcxihanFhfnphsZ66UWZSYXF+fn6eWllmxi BIbTwS2/dXcwrn7teIhRgINRiYdXIdMgVIg1say4MvcQozQHi5I4r53xoRAhgfTEktTs1NSC 1KL4otKc1OJDjEwcnFINjGGLa+vOzAho9OR/e9B9Yt+aTwzL2/K5JE7HMXLd6zFpX6slqNJv cylo28L+3M53HBbFb/covT228eG9Yq4w04DjmXMalFdMkFcNnda3+NVFy64F+efDX734PHFt ufh7aeG9vZf8gl8ZX31pyNe32rLPXPaMEKe/p/u1Y9Nf7194Zf+zQw/zpiixFGckGmoxFxUn AgD5IAnpCAIAAA== Archived-At: Subject: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 10:47:33 -0000 Hi, I would like to start a WGLC on the following draft. This WGLC will end on May 4th: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis/ Please, send your comments to this list. Thanks, Gonzalo From nobody Sat Apr 18 08:06:06 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEB441A883E; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 08:06:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vwV23wlcphDU; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 08:06:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA5111A1A42; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 08:06:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.0.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20150418150603.3471.78572.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 08:06:03 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: hipsec@ietf.org Subject: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis-07.txt X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 15:06:05 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Host Identity Protocol Working Group of the IETF. Title : Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Registration Extension Authors : Julien Laganier Lars Eggert Filename : draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis-07.txt Pages : 14 Date : 2015-04-18 Abstract: This document specifies a registration mechanism for the Host Identity Protocol (HIP) that allows hosts to register with services, such as HIP rendezvous servers or middleboxes. This document obsoletes RFC5203. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis-07 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis-07 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Sat Apr 18 08:07:42 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAAB01A8862 for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 08:07:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qhKcWzbq2KRR for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 08:07:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-la0-x22b.google.com (mail-la0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 263B01A885E for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 08:07:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by laat2 with SMTP id t2so99289363laa.1 for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 08:07:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Osfnl+qryaX1FrswfXd20waJ95ObCXN+iJ9oTBTkq38=; b=pwdCaMrBSfSQRYxn3qNKH94UNomY7qDJtFxjwwhqZmypDwRyDmFHgAQETizb2KaQym 99hTRmeNb44/YlQPIEO7Dmbu+KagN86z3YM75CP5WGxHCw9lLiRsElbEldgZomMccwti 9MyLjQuBlXzUEX0DFz3NzhjUHAD+6ip12N8X/pg+8LM/nxcDOcrkKRcIgs1qIm0fJyxX kONSa4unTQcDjPnt4jVabD+l4nAgYPevVbTUzysLpznFn/hhxA8VE7K1gWmBp7iVQ7M2 JGMSLg9rpw1/OwXlmXCN0LxXBuDy1TIYO9f7BID06+3LEioCCpvO5p/TYJbxvQvRrPEi ziIg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.140.231 with SMTP id rj7mr8485019lbb.76.1429369657681; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 08:07:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.43.2 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 08:07:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5530E447.7000308@ericsson.com> References: <552B72B6.6030405@ericsson.com> <5530E447.7000308@ericsson.com> Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 08:07:37 -0700 Message-ID: From: Julien Laganier To: Gonzalo Camarillo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Archived-At: Cc: HIP Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Next steps in the WG X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 15:07:41 -0000 Hi Gonzalo, Great. I have just submitted the revision of 5203-bis(-07) that addresses Ari's outstanding comment: A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis-07.txt has been successfully submitted by Julien Laganier and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis Revision: 07 Title: Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Registration Extension Document date: 2015-04-18 Group: hip Pages: 14 URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis-07.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis/ Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis-07 Diff: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis-07 Abstract: This document specifies a registration mechanism for the Host Identity Protocol (HIP) that allows hosts to register with services, such as HIP rendezvous servers or middleboxes. This document obsoletes RFC5203. On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 3:45 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: > Hi Julien, > > let's have these three drafts as our next batch. I am going to start > WGLCs on 5204bis and 5205bis right away, and will WGLC 5203bis as well > as soon as you submit the revision. > > Cheers, > > Gonzalo > > On 16/04/2015 5:14 PM, Julien Laganier wrote: >> Hi Gonzalo, >> >> From my perspective 5203bis, 5204bis, and 5205bis are ready to move >> forward. 5203 bis has recently expired and I will be resubmitting a >> fresh version shortly that addresses a couple of outstanding nits that >> Ari pointed out earlier >> >> (Thanks Ari!) >> >> --julien >> >> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:39 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> with the publication of RFC 7401 and 7402 we have completed a >>> publication batch. Now it is time to start working on the next one. >>> These are the remaining WG items we have on our charter: >>> >>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/hip/documents/ >>> >>> Their respective authors, could you please send a status update to this >>> list? We need to know the current status of all drafts, the next steps, >>> and also important, whether you have enough energy to put into this work >>> at this point. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Gonzalo >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Hipsec mailing list >>> Hipsec@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec > From nobody Wed Apr 22 08:33:25 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 103281ACCED; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 08:33:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.912 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id comWxZJF69-R; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 08:33:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 728561ACC85; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 08:33:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 3411F180208; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 08:32:06 -0700 (PDT) To: paul.hoffman@vpnc.org, rgm@icsalabs.com, pekka.nikander@nomadiclab.com, petri.jokela@nomadiclab.com, thomas.r.henderson@boeing.com X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php From: RFC Errata System Message-Id: <20150422153206.3411F180208@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 08:32:06 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Cc: hipsec@ietf.org, brian@innovationslab.net, iesg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [Hipsec] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC5201 (4319) X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 15:33:20 -0000 The following errata report has been held for document update for RFC5201, "Host Identity Protocol". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5201&eid=4319 -------------------------------------- Status: Held for Document Update Type: Editorial Reported by: Paul Hoffman Date Reported: 2015-03-31 Held by: Brian Haberman (IESG) Section: 3 Original Text ------------- HIP implementations MUST support the Rivest Shamir Adelman (RSA/SHA1) Corrected Text -------------- HIP implementations MUST support the Rivest Shamir Adleman (RSA/SHA1) Notes ----- Misspelling of one of the inventors' names. -------------------------------------- RFC5201 (draft-ietf-hip-base-10) -------------------------------------- Title : Host Identity Protocol Publication Date : April 2008 Author(s) : R. Moskowitz, P. Nikander, P. Jokela, Ed., T. Henderson Category : EXPERIMENTAL Source : Host Identity Protocol Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From nobody Fri Apr 24 03:09:09 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54A881A6EDA for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 03:09:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -104.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oALjoYNdFbUS for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 03:09:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sessmg22.ericsson.net (sessmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.58]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1DF71A3BA1 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 03:09:05 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb3a-f79146d0000070a3-d4-553a163fdd55 Received: from ESESSHC011.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sessmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id A5.61.28835.F361A355; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 12:09:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [131.160.36.162] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.53) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.210.2; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 12:09:02 +0200 Message-ID: <553A163F.8040802@ericsson.com> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 13:09:03 +0300 From: Gonzalo Camarillo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: HIP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrOJMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvja69mFWoQdM7S4upiyYzOzB6LFny kymAMYrLJiU1J7MstUjfLoErY/amdSwFL5kqXj2+wNjAuJapi5GDQ0LARKJhiWIXIyeQKSZx 4d56ti5GLg4hgaOMEvvu3GGCcNYwSsxvPsgMUsUroC1xYeYLJhCbRUBVYsKb32BxNgELiS23 7rOA2KICURITvx5igagXlDg58wmYLSIgKdFzdymYLSxgJHHu0wywOcwCBhJHFs1hhbDlJba/ nQM2Uwho1/JnLSwTGPlmIRk1C0nLLCQtCxiZVzGKFqcWF+emGxnppRZlJhcX5+fp5aWWbGIE htTBLb+tdjAefO54iFGAg1GJh3fBYstQIdbEsuLK3EOM0hwsSuK8dsaHQoQE0hNLUrNTUwtS i+KLSnNSiw8xMnFwSjUwypko5d7s1xNk/7b4nVm5pfbpxnyJ74+/+ZmZffr9sX/7DMGYCxcn rIuf7BrR68JdxH5p3z2uTSH3w5XmW+9m7Xi7zjV30ybzLw13Ek8+9Fhw1lAtKpKbzWADr9Px c8Wzzxn+23vZ+US09nUdJ8kIf/mwupAVSqtKbqV92Fh7yS1d4ecP8akuSizFGYmGWsxFxYkA +SYo9goCAAA= Archived-At: Subject: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 10:09:07 -0000 Hi, I would like to start a WGLC on the following draft. This WGLC will end on May 11th: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis/ Please, send your comments to this list. Thanks, Gonzalo _______________________________________________ Hipsec mailing list Hipsec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec From nobody Fri Apr 24 03:10:11 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D04C71A6EDA for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 03:10:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -104.201 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n2npFjwTR5VB for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 03:10:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net (sessmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFAE81A212A for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 03:10:08 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-f79a46d0000006b4-02-553a167f82ff Received: from ESESSHC022.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sessmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id AE.69.01716.F761A355; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 12:10:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [131.160.36.162] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.86) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.210.2; Fri, 24 Apr 2015 12:10:05 +0200 Message-ID: <553A167D.9040901@ericsson.com> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 13:10:05 +0300 From: Gonzalo Camarillo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julien Laganier References: <552B72B6.6030405@ericsson.com> <5530E447.7000308@ericsson.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrCLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvjW69mFWowePnfBZTF01mtvhydBqz A5PHzll32T2WLPnJFMAUxWWTkpqTWZZapG+XwJVx7+pzxoJ9YhX3FhxlamBsFupi5OSQEDCR +DvpGiOELSZx4d56ti5GLg4hgaOMEp+OfWSFcNYwSrybM5+li5GDg1dAW2LCBU+QBhYBVYmv qy4wgdhsAhYSW27dZwGxRQWiJCZ+PQRm8woISpyc+QTMFgFqPTWpAcxmFpCUWL7pFxuILSyg JfH05jJmiF1XGSXOf+pkB0lwCgRKdD36zg6yl1lAU2L9Ln2IXnmJ7W/nMIPYQkAzlz9rYZnA KDgLybpZCB2zkHQsYGRexShanFpcnJtuZKyXWpSZXFycn6eXl1qyiREYrAe3/Nbdwbj6teMh RgEORiUe3gWLLUOFWBPLiitzDzFKc7AoifPaGR8KERJITyxJzU5NLUgtii8qzUktPsTIxMEp 1cBYX/Kh9QR3aceV/lM3lAMmz40N4m96b6PEZR6jpp2owPoueV9tk438v3tbOtz1W+bZOTZM MVeQfzPT+v7lVH7DS33Xebed2p7w2X+qG+8n1X3Ox2eazjpQmP8h821DpOGylHLVKQnb1XRD Vz6NDVMyFb6pf+qMosF2n3U8D16zv+3yt352hVWJpTgj0VCLuag4EQBnejS2NwIAAA== Archived-At: Cc: HIP Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Next steps in the WG X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 10:10:11 -0000 Hi Julien, thanks for revising the draft and addressing the comments. I have just started its WGLC. Cheers, Gonzalo On 18/04/2015 6:07 PM, Julien Laganier wrote: > Hi Gonzalo, > > Great. I have just submitted the revision of 5203-bis(-07) that > addresses Ari's outstanding comment: > > A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis-07.txt > has been successfully submitted by Julien Laganier and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Name: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis > Revision: 07 > Title: Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Registration Extension > Document date: 2015-04-18 > Group: hip > Pages: 14 > URL: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis-07.txt > Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis/ > Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis-07 > Diff: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis-07 > > Abstract: > This document specifies a registration mechanism for the Host > Identity Protocol (HIP) that allows hosts to register with services, > such as HIP rendezvous servers or middleboxes. This document > obsoletes RFC5203. > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 3:45 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo > wrote: >> Hi Julien, >> >> let's have these three drafts as our next batch. I am going to start >> WGLCs on 5204bis and 5205bis right away, and will WGLC 5203bis as well >> as soon as you submit the revision. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Gonzalo >> >> On 16/04/2015 5:14 PM, Julien Laganier wrote: >>> Hi Gonzalo, >>> >>> From my perspective 5203bis, 5204bis, and 5205bis are ready to move >>> forward. 5203 bis has recently expired and I will be resubmitting a >>> fresh version shortly that addresses a couple of outstanding nits that >>> Ari pointed out earlier >>> >>> (Thanks Ari!) >>> >>> --julien >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:39 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo >>> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> with the publication of RFC 7401 and 7402 we have completed a >>>> publication batch. Now it is time to start working on the next one. >>>> These are the remaining WG items we have on our charter: >>>> >>>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/hip/documents/ >>>> >>>> Their respective authors, could you please send a status update to this >>>> list? We need to know the current status of all drafts, the next steps, >>>> and also important, whether you have enough energy to put into this work >>>> at this point. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Gonzalo >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Hipsec mailing list >>>> Hipsec@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec >>