From nobody Wed Dec 9 04:55:21 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietf.org Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE6B1A9092; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 04:55:19 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.11.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20151209125519.15501.68845.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 04:55:19 -0800 Archived-At: Cc: hipsec@ietf.org Subject: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-06.txt X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 12:55:19 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Host Identity Protocol Working Group of the IETF. Title : Host Identity Protocol Certificates Authors : Tobias Heer Samu Varjonen Filename : draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-06.txt Pages : 10 Date : 2015-12-09 Abstract: The Certificate (CERT) parameter is a container for digital certificates. It is used for carrying these certificates in Host Identity Protocol (HIP) control packets. This document specifies the certificate parameter and the error signaling in case of a failed verification. Additionally, this document specifies the representations of Host Identity Tags in X.509 version 3 (v3). The concrete use cases of certificates, including how certificates are obtained, requested, and which actions are taken upon successful or failed verification, are specific to the scenario in which the certificates are used. Hence, the definition of these scenario- specific aspects is left to the documents that use the CERT parameter. This document updates RFC7401 and obsoletes RFC6253. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-06 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-06 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Wed Dec 9 04:58:59 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA1E21A90A8 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 04:58:58 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id euZXaRh9BM8v for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 04:58:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp-rs1-vallila2.fe.helsinki.fi (smtp-rs1-vallila2.fe.helsinki.fi [128.214.173.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F7B41A90A4 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 04:58:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from [128.214.10.115] (hpf-7.cs.helsinki.fi [128.214.10.115]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-rs1.it.helsinki.fi (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id tB9CwqER000798 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 14:58:53 +0200 To: hipsec@ietf.org References: <20151209125519.15501.68845.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> From: Samu Varjonen Message-ID: <5668258C.9080106@helsinki.fi> Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 14:58:52 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151209125519.15501.68845.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-06.txt X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 12:58:59 -0000 Hi all, this version addresses the Int-Dir review comments from Jouni Korhonen. -Samu On 09/12/15 14:55, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > This draft is a work item of the Host Identity Protocol Working Group of the IETF. > > Title : Host Identity Protocol Certificates > Authors : Tobias Heer > Samu Varjonen > Filename : draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-06.txt > Pages : 10 > Date : 2015-12-09 > > Abstract: > The Certificate (CERT) parameter is a container for digital > certificates. It is used for carrying these certificates in Host > Identity Protocol (HIP) control packets. This document specifies the > certificate parameter and the error signaling in case of a failed > verification. Additionally, this document specifies the > representations of Host Identity Tags in X.509 version 3 (v3). > > The concrete use cases of certificates, including how certificates > are obtained, requested, and which actions are taken upon successful > or failed verification, are specific to the scenario in which the > certificates are used. Hence, the definition of these scenario- > specific aspects is left to the documents that use the CERT > parameter. > > This document updates RFC7401 and obsoletes RFC6253. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis/ > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-06 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-06 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > Hipsec mailing list > Hipsec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec From nobody Sun Dec 13 14:30:28 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 490461A8863 for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 14:30:26 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SdsyVL_45gPB for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 14:30:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from sesbmg22.ericsson.net (sesbmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64B9A1A886F for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 14:30:23 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-f79296d00000141d-a6-566df17da795 Received: from ESESSHC019.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.75]) by sesbmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id AB.F8.05149.D71FD665; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 23:30:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from ESESSMB205.ericsson.se ([169.254.5.115]) by ESESSHC019.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 23:30:20 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ari_Ker=E4nen?= To: HIP , Gonzalo Camarillo Thread-Topic: [Hipsec] Status of our next batch Thread-Index: AQHRNfXZ/csMZFBSyEm4WmroYUfKAQ== Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 22:30:19 +0000 Message-ID: References: <564C2E26.5030609@ericsson.com> In-Reply-To: <564C2E26.5030609@ericsson.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.150] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprKIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2K7t27tx9wwg6kzpS2mLprM7MDosWTJ T6YAxigum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujNdLvAuecVS8X/KTpYFxKXsXIyeHhICJxKLjy9ggbDGJC/fW A9lcHEIChxkl1rd/gXKWMEo0f/jKAlLFJmAvMXnNR0YQW0TAV2LShGdg3cwCahLLfuxkArGF BfQktl2fxA5Roy8xY/taFghbT6J73lFWEJtFQFXi4+/fYHFeoJlTb65gBrGFBLQl+hZsBarh 4OAU0JHY+DsJJMwIdNz3U2uYIFaJS9x6Mp8J4mgBiSV7zjND2KISLx//Y4WwlSRWbL/ECFGv J3Fj6hSoM60lvh86CWVrSyxb+JoZ4gRBiZMzn7BMYBSfhWTFLCTts5C0z0LSPgtJ+wJG1lWM osWpxUm56UZGeqlFmcnFxfl5enmpJZsYgZF1cMtvgx2ML587HmIU4GBU4uE1OJAbJsSaWFZc mXuIUYKDWUmEt+80UIg3JbGyKrUoP76oNCe1+BCjNAeLkjhvM9ODUCGB9MSS1OzU1ILUIpgs EwenVAOjesGVzxJmbtuVOYS/PMiV9H02izlpS+DmU9wOZrf7NnG0ict//fhjS1hxlaNlk+Li 8BhjjrXPpBT/PZ5wZD2XzQae545TP5jIrpLyvl1c/+X86eOVOY0hfsyPnjLbv+VWmJDHFfqs g/+VV+yVGdzfXngY1wUKssr2dwZ9ZF1Q7XNmHZ/4nb9KLMUZiYZazEXFiQD4JF/FqAIAAA== Archived-At: Cc: Jan Melen Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Status of our next batch X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 22:30:26 -0000 Hi, We were thinking of adding a bit more details on the relaying part of the n= ative NAT traversal draft, but after giving it bit more though, probably th= at is not necessary. We will do final review for the draft to make sure it = is aligned with the rest of the documents, but after that, we should be goo= d to go forward with the WGLC. Cheers, Ari > On 18 Nov 2015, at 08:52, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: >=20 > Authors of the following drafts, >=20 > could you please let the WG know their status and what needs to happen > next for each of them in order to be able to WGLC them at some point in > the future? >=20 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-multihoming/ > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal/ > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis/ > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis/ >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Gonzalo >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Hipsec mailing list > Hipsec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec From nobody Mon Dec 14 04:56:55 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietf.org Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 550521ACE2C; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 04:56:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.11.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20151214125654.15614.80927.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 04:56:54 -0800 Archived-At: Cc: hipsec@ietf.org Subject: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis-13.txt X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 12:56:54 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Host Identity Protocol Working Group of the IETF. Title : Host Identity Protocol Architecture Authors : Robert Moskowitz Miika Komu Filename : draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis-13.txt Pages : 39 Date : 2015-12-14 Abstract: This memo describes a new namespace, the Host Identity namespace, and a new protocol layer, the Host Identity Protocol, between the internetworking and transport layers. Herein are presented the basics of the current namespaces, their strengths and weaknesses, and how a new namespace will add completeness to them. The roles of this new namespace in the protocols are defined. This document obsoletes RFC 4423 and addresses the concerns raised by the IESG, particularly that of crypto agility. It incorporates lessons learned from the implementations of RFC 5201 and goes further to explain how HIP works as a secure signaling channel. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis-13 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis-13 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Mon Dec 14 04:58:45 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F03771A6FA8 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 04:58:44 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UHT2vdZR3SI3 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 04:58:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.cs.hut.fi (mail.cs.hut.fi [130.233.192.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCB5F1A6EED for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 04:58:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (mannerheim.cs.hut.fi [130.233.193.8]) by mail.cs.hut.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1252D1BC56 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 14:58:36 +0200 (EET) To: hipsec@ietf.org References: <20151214125654.15614.80927.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> From: Miika Komu Message-ID: <566EBCFB.5040509@cs.hut.fi> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 14:58:35 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151214125654.15614.80927.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis-13.txt X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 12:58:45 -0000 FYI, this is just a keepalive. On 12/14/2015 02:56 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > This draft is a work item of the Host Identity Protocol Working Group of the IETF. > > Title : Host Identity Protocol Architecture > Authors : Robert Moskowitz > Miika Komu > Filename : draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis-13.txt > Pages : 39 > Date : 2015-12-14 > > Abstract: > This memo describes a new namespace, the Host Identity namespace, and > a new protocol layer, the Host Identity Protocol, between the > internetworking and transport layers. Herein are presented the > basics of the current namespaces, their strengths and weaknesses, and > how a new namespace will add completeness to them. The roles of this > new namespace in the protocols are defined. > > This document obsoletes RFC 4423 and addresses the concerns raised by > the IESG, particularly that of crypto agility. It incorporates > lessons learned from the implementations of RFC 5201 and goes further > to explain how HIP works as a secure signaling channel. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis/ > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis-13 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis-13 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > Hipsec mailing list > Hipsec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec > From nobody Mon Dec 14 08:17:07 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietf.org Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E2CD1A8A59; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 08:17:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.11.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20151214161704.20517.24009.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 08:17:04 -0800 Archived-At: Cc: hipsec@ietf.org Subject: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-08.txt X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 16:17:05 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Host Identity Protocol Working Group of the IETF. Title : Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Domain Name System (DNS) Extension Author : Julien Laganier Filename : draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-08.txt Pages : 17 Date : 2015-12-14 Abstract: This document specifies a new resource record (RR) for the Domain Name System (DNS), and how to use it with the Host Identity Protocol (HIP). This RR allows a HIP node to store in the DNS its Host Identity (HI, the public component of the node public-private key pair), Host Identity Tag (HIT, a truncated hash of its public key), and the Domain Names of its rendezvous servers (RVSs). This document obsoletes RFC5205. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-08 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-08 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Mon Dec 14 15:54:31 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietf.org Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9188F1A87C3; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 15:54:23 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: "IETF-Announce" X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.11.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Sender: Message-ID: <20151214235423.23093.53848.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 15:54:23 -0800 Archived-At: Cc: hipsec@ietf.org, draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis@ietf.org, hip-chairs@ietf.org Subject: [Hipsec] Last Call: (Host Identity Protocol Certificates) to Proposed Standard X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 23:54:23 -0000 The IESG has received a request from the Host Identity Protocol WG (hip) to consider the following document: - 'Host Identity Protocol Certificates' as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2015-12-28. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract The Certificate (CERT) parameter is a container for digital certificates. It is used for carrying these certificates in Host Identity Protocol (HIP) control packets. This document specifies the certificate parameter and the error signaling in case of a failed verification. Additionally, this document specifies the representations of Host Identity Tags in X.509 version 3 (v3). The concrete use cases of certificates, including how certificates are obtained, requested, and which actions are taken upon successful or failed verification, are specific to the scenario in which the certificates are used. Hence, the definition of these scenario- specific aspects is left to the documents that use the CERT parameter. This document updates RFC7401 and obsoletes RFC6253. The file can be obtained via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis/ IESG discussion can be tracked via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. From nobody Mon Dec 14 15:58:20 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietf.org Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1551F1A87C8; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 15:58:19 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: "IETF-Announce" X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.11.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Sender: Message-ID: <20151214235819.15162.73978.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 15:58:19 -0800 Archived-At: Cc: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis@ietf.org, hipsec@ietf.org, hip-chairs@ietf.org Subject: [Hipsec] Last Call: (Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Registration Extension) to Proposed Standard X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 23:58:19 -0000 The IESG has received a request from the Host Identity Protocol WG (hip) to consider the following document: - 'Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Registration Extension' as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2015-12-28. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract This document specifies a registration mechanism for the Host Identity Protocol (HIP) that allows hosts to register with services, such as HIP rendezvous servers or middleboxes. This document obsoletes RFC5203. The file can be obtained via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis/ IESG discussion can be tracked via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. From nobody Mon Dec 14 15:58:51 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietf.org Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94D821A87CB; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 15:58:47 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: "IETF-Announce" X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.11.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Sender: Message-ID: <20151214235847.23046.96661.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 15:58:47 -0800 Archived-At: Cc: hipsec@ietf.org, draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis@ietf.org, hip-chairs@ietf.org Subject: [Hipsec] Last Call: (Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Rendezvous Extension) to Proposed Standard X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 23:58:47 -0000 The IESG has received a request from the Host Identity Protocol WG (hip) to consider the following document: - 'Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Rendezvous Extension' as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2015-12-28. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract This document defines a rendezvous extension for the Host Identity Protocol (HIP). The rendezvous extension extends HIP and the HIP registration extension for initiating communication between HIP nodes via HIP rendezvous servers. Rendezvous servers improve reachability and operation when HIP nodes are multi-homed or mobile. This document obsoletes RFC5204. The file can be obtained via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis/ IESG discussion can be tracked via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. From nobody Mon Dec 14 15:59:24 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietf.org Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA721A8829; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 15:59:22 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: "IETF-Announce" X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.11.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Sender: Message-ID: <20151214235922.23971.4423.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 15:59:22 -0800 Archived-At: Cc: hipsec@ietf.org, draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis@ietf.org, hip-chairs@ietf.org Subject: [Hipsec] Last Call: (Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Domain Name System (DNS) Extension) to Proposed Standard X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 23:59:23 -0000 The IESG has received a request from the Host Identity Protocol WG (hip) to consider the following document: - 'Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Domain Name System (DNS) Extension' as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2015-12-28. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract This document specifies a new resource record (RR) for the Domain Name System (DNS), and how to use it with the Host Identity Protocol (HIP). This RR allows a HIP node to store in the DNS its Host Identity (HI, the public component of the node public-private key pair), Host Identity Tag (HIT, a truncated hash of its public key), and the Domain Names of its rendezvous servers (RVSs). This document obsoletes RFC5205. The file can be obtained via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis/ IESG discussion can be tracked via https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. From nobody Wed Dec 16 10:35:37 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F190C1A878A; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 10:35:35 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.702 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.702 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 64qR3a0xRhJg; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 10:35:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailb2.tigertech.net (mailb2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.154]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D694A1A8798; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 10:35:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC1E87A05D7; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 10:35:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=1.tigertech; t=1450290933; bh=dWZO4sDGpIyA4ncLibQECgWYQ+1ww+48FsBpYUFRkWA=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=A/pWZ25dKbKfGM+e9GoCLk0jR83eblG4YUOGVUUJm4Ex7eXj/8mO44KbC3daC5XVb 6w+T3sb43OGgi9M24mObuR5XP8PLhnA1NWCxKdIZiUkMkqf2lQybNMyveP+IxkAwLX +u09EQJev7nb/TISDmS3jgT3U6FXa2uPJugZBvYM= X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at b2.tigertech.net Received: from Joels-MacBook-Pro.local (unknown [94.200.20.251]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 568627A05DB; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 10:35:32 -0800 (PST) To: "A. Jean Mahoney" , General Area Review Team , hipsec@ietf.org References: <567055B1.1080806@nostrum.com> From: "Joel M. Halpern" Message-ID: <5671AEF1.5000109@joelhalpern.com> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 13:35:29 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <567055B1.1080806@nostrum.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: [Hipsec] [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis-06 X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 18:35:36 -0000 I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at . Document: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis-06 Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Rendezvous Extension Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 16-Dec-2015 IETF LC End Date: 28-Dec-2015 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard Major issues: Minor issues: Appendix A states that this document was changed by "Added relaying of UPDATE packets to support double jump mobility scenario." Searching the document for the word update, I do not find any such relaying description. Nits/editorial comments: From nobody Thu Dec 17 09:12:26 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EAF71A1AFF; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 09:12:24 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V28Ll4g0j7Jk; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 09:12:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-yk0-x234.google.com (mail-yk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6E151A03C7; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 09:12:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yk0-x234.google.com with SMTP id 140so26564059ykp.0; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 09:12:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=F9OeVOxtNhbnelif4c0dvCb9g4tscmFrTrNjEqyAHcM=; b=Hj1ToGDesYHuZH+qVtxklTkMEUlhnaAehPEhkA9WcPUBxUMd8UVab1WRd5Ary9y1J9 xXtCLSIIs/nBy3pWiQ9pQv/APJVw7g+1qQzkMH4OJw0JNNRewk+htLZN+hYKISECPhpV bOdjL1htxXouCN3iHZravNXXMAOdbTH4aQdc+8Vqq50sY3S4UkTAkWmWLH/iDing0AjK 2laQO9PS8OQBdO1/iHHEssTmmQZJxR0EXEGxDLrzm5ROEnb4HHkE1lz/GLzLlY7tP+lG +hldf2lSdmWYVuit6KdQrxs07ASTEBUjwdeTVgP2seTre2LXsS0QA6YtjGFsib3v2QwC SvEg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.129.32.213 with SMTP id g204mr33566842ywg.234.1450372341839; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 09:12:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.13.226.198 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 09:12:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5671AEF1.5000109@joelhalpern.com> References: <567055B1.1080806@nostrum.com> <5671AEF1.5000109@joelhalpern.com> Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 09:12:21 -0800 Message-ID: From: Julien Laganier To: "Joel M. Halpern" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Archived-At: Cc: HIP , General Area Review Team , "A. Jean Mahoney" Subject: Re: [Hipsec] [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis-06 X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 17:12:24 -0000 Hi Joel, Thank you for reviewing the document, and catching the discrepancy between was Appendix A states in terms of UPDATE and double jump mobility scenario, and the actual content of the document. The WG discussed where to specify support for that scenario, and the decision was that since it is only needed in mobility scenario, this should be covered in the Host Mobility for HIP specification, aka rfc5206bis. Thus the Appendix A statement in 5203bis that it's adding support for this scenario should have been removed some time ago. I will post an update shortly. For the record, the supporting specification for that scenario can be found in section 3.2.3 of rfc5206bis: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis-09#section-3.2.3 Best, --julien On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > . > > Document: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis-06 > Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Rendezvous Extension > Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern > Review Date: 16-Dec-2015 > IETF LC End Date: 28-Dec-2015 > IESG Telechat date: N/A > > Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard > > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > Appendix A states that this document was changed by "Added relaying of > UPDATE packets to support double jump mobility scenario." Searching the > document for the word update, I do not find any such relaying description. > > Nits/editorial comments: > > _______________________________________________ > Hipsec mailing list > Hipsec@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec From nobody Thu Dec 17 12:39:50 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hipsec@ietf.org Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E1071B309D; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 12:39:49 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.11.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20151217203949.7310.57149.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 12:39:49 -0800 Archived-At: Cc: hipsec@ietf.org Subject: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis-07.txt X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 20:39:49 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Host Identity Protocol Working Group of the IETF. Title : Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Rendezvous Extension Authors : Julien Laganier Lars Eggert Filename : draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis-07.txt Pages : 14 Date : 2015-12-17 Abstract: This document defines a rendezvous extension for the Host Identity Protocol (HIP). The rendezvous extension extends HIP and the HIP registration extension for initiating communication between HIP nodes via HIP rendezvous servers. Rendezvous servers improve reachability and operation when HIP nodes are multi-homed or mobile. This document obsoletes RFC5204. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis-07 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis-07 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/