From gabor.molnar@sch.bme.hu Wed Sep 18 02:05:37 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: http-devops@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: http-devops@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02CE611E820D for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 02:05:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.545 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.545 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.464, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HELO_EQ_HU=1.35, HOST_EQ_HU=1.245, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rnrbgqREc--U for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 02:05:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from balu.sch.bme.hu (balu.sch.bme.hu [152.66.208.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D61911E8211 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 02:05:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ie0-f175.google.com (mail-ie0-f175.google.com [209.85.223.175]) by balu.sch.bme.hu (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-7.05 (built Sep 5 2006)) with ESMTPSA id <0MTB005JPD91HX00@balu.sch.bme.hu> for http-devops@ietf.org; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 11:05:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-ie0-f175.google.com with SMTP id e14so11679138iej.6 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 02:05:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.10.66 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 02:05:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.43.162.136 with SMTP id mk8mr7016999icc.9.1379495125200; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 02:05:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 11:05:05 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?R8OhYm9yIE1vbG7DoXI=?= To: http-devops@ietf.org Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_7OmBI/BEjUD9k4QuQpvEWg)" X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=mNBKjlcPL8UmTZrVeClQkBfKh6uN0zkpXnIAMTSRxxY=; b=Z7aBprHOQ+dwM7sYTqfFRo/hLwYqk3luB6joERGZ2IG8v4gjYTwagKsk53XQqK0tlf Xqil4rMakl3uY8R9eNB7AQFBJZTLAKd9dxa2QYgEe6rHfMo5vEwuNytw3TM4CvZKXIl2 RrTxO1sZOzv8L82ouXIdOSfk/ebc1FIKgWC8GRkwiMdPNnhhJX4scVb85vkkeqs91AWw n+7rmfglK/WTxsUlIOL++MOsbPAfopzdY/Igmpk3HEDOBMOTLDa+KG3sMqDo03GHoS80 piTiLrzqA4Bxnj1v3qeH6YV9dCbBHjAmRxLx+ywIwVfZrI5GqHIZQxlvMeVTTD0S1P3J auDA== Cc: Nicholas Hurley , Fred Akalin , Patrick McManus , Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa Subject: [http-devops] HTTP/2 test page X-BeenThere: http-devops@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about operation, deployment and testing of HTTP" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 09:05:37 -0000 --Boundary_(ID_7OmBI/BEjUD9k4QuQpvEWg) Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Hello list, I started a HTTP/2 testing project based on node-http2 (as part of my GSoC project), and thought it would be useful for many HTTP/2 client implementors. It's called http2-testpage, and the code is available here: https://github.com/molnarg/http2-testpage It is now mainly focused on testing error scenarios, since that's something that is hard to test without custom server software, but I hope to test other parts of the protocol, too, in the future. Pull requests and test case suggestions (as GitHub issues, or here on the list) are welcome! I would also like to hear if some error scenarios would be more important to test than others (for example scenarios that will be very rare in the wild). G=C3=A1bor --Boundary_(ID_7OmBI/BEjUD9k4QuQpvEWg) Content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Hello list,

I started a HTTP/2= testing project based on node-http2 (as part of my GSoC project), and thou= ght it would be useful for many HTTP/2 client implementors. It's called= http2-testpage, and the code is available here: https://github.com/molnarg/http2-testpage
It is now mainly focused on testing error scenarios, since that&#= 39;s something that is hard to test without custom server software, but I h= ope to test other parts of the protocol, too, in the future.

Pull requests and test case suggestions (as GitHub issues, or here on the l= ist) are welcome! I would also like to hear if some error scenarios would b= e more important to test than others (for example scenarios that will be ve= ry rare in the wild).

=C2=A0 G=C3=A1bor
--Boundary_(ID_7OmBI/BEjUD9k4QuQpvEWg)-- From miclai@microsoft.com Wed Sep 18 16:58:15 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: http-devops@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: http-devops@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 254D611E8166 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:58:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_MOSTLY=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0YMKtmBddIZO for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:58:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2lp0205.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.205]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C316211E8147 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:58:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from BL2PR03MB164.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.230.148) by BL2PR03MB163.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.230.147) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.775.9; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 23:57:48 +0000 Received: from BL2PR03MB164.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.10.22]) by BL2PR03MB164.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.10.22]) with mapi id 15.00.0775.005; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 23:57:47 +0000 From: Michelle Lai To: "http-devops@ietfa.amsl.com" Thread-Topic: HTTP/2.0 Protocol Test Draft Thread-Index: Ac60yuVLHWbfi5EPS7adzqOAFzuCLw== Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 23:57:46 +0000 Message-ID: <37284badbb2546d99881df0e3e3b66d0@BL2PR03MB164.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [2001:4898:80e8:ed31::3] x-forefront-prvs: 09730BD177 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(199002)(189002)(83322001)(79102001)(63696002)(51856001)(15975445006)(54356001)(46102001)(77096001)(15202345003)(47976001)(53806001)(56776001)(83072001)(59766001)(76786001)(76576001)(74316001)(74366001)(19300405004)(77982001)(65816001)(47736001)(33646001)(81816001)(80976001)(81686001)(19580395003)(50986001)(56816003)(49866001)(74876001)(4396001)(80022001)(76796001)(31966008)(74662001)(16236675002)(76176001)(81542001)(81342001)(76482001)(69226001)(54316002)(74706001)(47446002)(74502001)(73894003)(24736002)(3826001); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BL2PR03MB163; H:BL2PR03MB164.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; CLIP:2001:4898:80e8:ed31::3; FPR:; RD:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:; Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_37284badbb2546d99881df0e3e3b66d0BL2PR03MB164namprd03pro_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: DuplicateDomain-a84fc36a-4ed7-4e57-ab1c-3e967bcbad48.microsoft.com Subject: [http-devops] HTTP/2.0 Protocol Test Draft X-BeenThere: http-devops@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about operation, deployment and testing of HTTP" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 16:06:13 -0000 --_000_37284badbb2546d99881df0e3e3b66d0BL2PR03MB164namprd03pro_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable --_000_37284badbb2546d99881df0e3e3b66d0BL2PR03MB164namprd03pro_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

 

--_000_37284badbb2546d99881df0e3e3b66d0BL2PR03MB164namprd03pro_-- From miclai@microsoft.com Wed Sep 18 16:56:42 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: http-devops@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: http-devops@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2FF11E8166 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:56:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MACKL1UgsPMi for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:56:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2lp0243.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.243]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2454B11E8147 for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 16:56:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from BL2PR03MB164.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.230.148) by BL2PR03MB162.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.230.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.775.9; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 23:56:37 +0000 Received: from BL2PR03MB164.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.10.22]) by BL2PR03MB164.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.10.22]) with mapi id 15.00.0775.005; Wed, 18 Sep 2013 23:56:36 +0000 From: Michelle Lai To: "http-devops@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: HTTP/2.0 Protocol Test Draft Thread-Index: Ac60yXxVdOJZ7dtSQNWx6PUcn5rnzw== Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 23:56:36 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [2001:4898:80e8:ed31::3] x-forefront-prvs: 09730BD177 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(164054003)(199002)(189002)(53754006)(50986001)(46102001)(74706001)(54316002)(33646001)(47446002)(49866001)(56776001)(74876001)(15975445006)(74316001)(81342001)(81542001)(31966008)(69226001)(558084003)(76796001)(83072001)(4396001)(77096001)(76576001)(47976001)(63696002)(76786001)(80022001)(74502001)(76482001)(54356001)(19300405004)(79102001)(74662001)(81686001)(74366001)(81816001)(83322001)(19580395003)(16236675002)(53806001)(47736001)(65816001)(59766001)(51856001)(77982001)(76176001)(15202345003)(80976001)(56816003)(24736002)(3826001); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BL2PR03MB162; H:BL2PR03MB164.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; CLIP:2001:4898:80e8:ed31::3; FPR:; RD:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_df2c3b233ef3448db13256511e6011c8BL2PR03MB164namprd03pro_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: DuplicateDomain-a84fc36a-4ed7-4e57-ab1c-3e967bcbad48.microsoft.com Subject: [http-devops] HTTP/2.0 Protocol Test Draft X-BeenThere: http-devops@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about operation, deployment and testing of HTTP" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 16:14:02 -0000 --_000_df2c3b233ef3448db13256511e6011c8BL2PR03MB164namprd03pro_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Everyone, I wrote up a doc for HTTP/2.0 test guidance and principles. The main focus is to test the compliance with the HTTP/2.0 protocol spec. The test draft is at: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-trace-httpbis-http2-test-00.txt Comments and suggestions are welcome. Thanks, Michelle Lai --_000_df2c3b233ef3448db13256511e6011c8BL2PR03MB164namprd03pro_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Everyone,

 

I wrote up a doc for HTTP/2.0 test guidance and prin= ciples.

The main focus is to test the compliance with the HT= TP/2.0 protocol spec.

 

The test draft is at:

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-trace-httpbis-http2-test-= 00.txt

 

Comments and suggestions are welcome.

 

Thanks,

Michelle Lai

--_000_df2c3b233ef3448db13256511e6011c8BL2PR03MB164namprd03pro_--