Subject: [I2nsf] conflicts to avoid for i2nsf Meeting Session Request for IETF 98

From: Linda Dunbar <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 07:47:36 +0000

Here are the conflicts I have requested to avoid for the IETF98. If you plan to make presentation, but have specific session conflict, please let us know. 

Linda & Adrian. 

-----Original Message-----
From: "IETF Meeting Session Request Tool" [mailto:[email-masked]] 
Sent: 2017年1月5日 1:44
To: [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked]; Linda Dunbar <[email-masked]>
Subject: i2nsf - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 98

A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Linda Dunbar, a Chair of the i2nsf working group.

---------------------------------------------------------
Working Group Name: Interface to Network Security Functions Area Name: Security Area Session Requester: Linda Dunbar

Number of Sessions: 1
Length of Session(s):  2 Hours
Number of Attendees: 60
Conflicts to Avoid: 
 First Priority: I2RS, IDR, TRILL, TEAS,  RTGarea,  LIME, SUPA, L2SM, NETconf, DOTS, SACM, SAAG,NFVrg,  Second Priority: SFC, RTGWG, MILE, NETMOD, SDNrg,  Third Priority: NVO3

Special Requests:
  
---------------------------------------------------------