Subject: Re: [i2rs] info vs data models

From: Adrian Farrel <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:17:39 +0000

Thanks Dave,

I can't emphasise this strongly enough. 3444 is more than "worth reading", it is mandatory for 
people wanting to participate in this discussion. 

It is not a big document. Read it now :-)

Adrian

On Thu 14/03/13  3:09 PM , "Dave Hood" [email-masked] sent:
> There seems to be continuing confusion about info vs data models,
> including the current presentation about building a yang data model that
> can *THEN* be converted into an info model. 
> 
>   
> 
> RFC 3444 is worth reading.    
> _______________________________________________
> i2rs mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs [1]
> 
> 
> 
> Links:
> ------
> [1]
> http://webmail.easyspace.com/parse.php?redirect=https://www.ietf.org/mailma
> n/listinfo/i2rs
>