Subject: Re: New version of the DVMRP AS

From: Tom Pusateri <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 08:10:52 -0700

In message <[email-masked]> yo
u write:
>Hi Tom,
>  
>
>> 3.  State Analysis
>.......
>> 
>>    This mechanism prevents duplicate datagrams from arriving on multi-
>>    access networks at the expense of more state in the router. DVMRP
>>    requires designated forwarder election state to be kept per prefix
>>    per interface and prune state to be kept per neighbor per prefix.
> 
>      Should this be "..prune state to be kept per neighbor per (prefix,
>group) pair"?
>
>      And with /32 mask prunes this could turn out to be per (source, group)
>pair, 
>      but that detail can be found in the DVMRP draft.
>
>      - Ravi Shekhar.

Hi Ravi,

I'll fix this.

Thanks,
Tom

---

From: "Shekhar, Ravi" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 10:56:26 -0400

Hi Tom,

.......

      - Ravi Shekhar.