Subject: [EAI] POLL RESULT: HDR= extension on MAIL FROM

From: Harald Alvestrand <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 13:04:26 +0200

As of this moment, I beleve that April 9 is over just about everywhere.
I have the following responses to the
opinion poll announced on April 4, one more than the preliminary:

A - I support HDR=UTF8
- Frank Ellermann
- Kari Hurtta (prefers HDR=UTF8SMTP if added)

B - I support NOT adding HDR=UTF8
- Yangwoo Ko
- John Klensin
- Yao Jiankang
- Jeff Yeh
- Martin Duerst
- Harald Alvestrand
- Chris Newman

C - I have an opinion different from the 2 alternatives given, which is....
- Soobok Lee (missing HDR parameter interpreted as HDR=UTF8)
- Charles Lindsey (disagrees with definition)

That gives a grand total of 11 people with an opinion on this matter,
unless I've missed some.

Based on this poll, it seems reasonable to instruct the editors of the 
SMTPEXT document *not* to add anything about a HDR= parameter.

Please notify me of any errors, misunderstandings or missed opinions.

                     Harald

_______________________________________________
IMA mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ima