Subject: Re: [EAI] Consensus Result on Issue #3 - remove repetition of normative text?

From: Joseph Yee <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 01:29:57 -0500

For lack of discussion, and seeing it not necessary.  With the consensus made to remove repetition, editors will make their best judgement how to reference normative text.

Regards,
Joseph, co-chair EAI

On 2011-01-28, at 11:45 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote:

> 
> 
> On 1/28/2011 8:28 AM, Joseph Yee wrote:
>> Subsequent proposed questions
>> Should the WG develop a template like wording to help referencing? (YES/NO) If Yes, what should the text be?
>> A separate email will focus on this discussion.
> 
> 
> Excellent idea.
> 
> 
> Perhaps something like:
> 
>   The details for <x> are covered in <y>.
> 
> where:
> 
>   x specifies the topic, issue, problem or the like that needs to be highlighted in the current draft; the wording of this characterizes the concern that warrants making the citation.
> 
>   y is as precise a citation as can be provided.
> 
> d/
> 
> -- 
> 
>  Dave Crocker
>  Brandenburg InternetWorking
>  bbiw.net