Subject: Re: [EAI] (Dave's detail suggestion (Dave CROCKER)

From: Shawn Steele <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 19:46:16 +0000

I agree with dave's points (still) that the text shouldn't be duplicated.  

* Readers still need to understand the older mail RFCs
* In the event of errata or something to the older RFCs, it gets more confusing if stuff is duplicated.

-Shawn