From nobody Wed Dec 2 12:58:51 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66FC61A03D5 for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 12:58:48 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oHCIpG_WhbyE for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 12:58:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qg0-x22f.google.com (mail-qg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAA241A0383 for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 12:58:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by qgeb1 with SMTP id b1so44680566qge.1 for ; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 12:58:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=G//EpgeTrA2uwha1c5qigbD9fQn5Yd9q3rKdfgzI4YY=; b=QsRV24iACv9PDAVnuhwlpquKg6Km7aDGqSjedK79FhSGlY0v85ybQQD3jlEAn2CrOq oAHfHQjZC3VW6hZ+cDT07qs0cTJnPGDFB3FeY7cY8M0p/pvSiqlMYNeFUAQyBJvyjFUS EjQnzBmUncs9zE9rat/bdplPkxYmN46dWaVPqjWr+OlV1Dc5i/jorQmtwOSuX3+y++ph lrieYUvLJd3Aouf7gtxN6rI0VIhbjnZctQ7ckxAMj0OxrgxMdk3Yp52CGLT+wIzwPuZu Sge9wt8dgGBgt3Yj7Egx72iNxxEulzNcyTJFo5CXEBrDQPgfdwAv+1mHzT+ICBQDafEQ OFag== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.97.229 with SMTP id m92mr6734264qge.22.1449089925969; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 12:58:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.55.124.5 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 12:58:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 21:58:45 +0100 Message-ID: From: Zhen Cao To: int-dir@ietf.org, "Bernie Volz (volz)" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Archived-At: Cc: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis@tools.ietf.org Subject: [Int-dir] Int-Dir review of draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 20:58:48 -0000 "I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see http://www.ietf.org/iesg/directorate.html." I found the document well written and it contains minor but necessary updates to RFC5204. The changed portion of this document is well stated and I believe this document is ready to be published. Some editorial findings by idnits below: == Outdated reference: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis has been published as RFC 7401 == Outdated reference: A later version (-09) exists of draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis-07 == Outdated reference: A later version (-07) exists of draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-06 == Outdated reference: A later version (-12) exists of draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis-11 == Outdated reference: A later version (-09) exists of draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis-08 -Zhen From nobody Wed Dec 2 13:14:23 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76FF1B2A11 for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 13:14:22 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VPC8eX6piXGp for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 13:14:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qg0-x22e.google.com (mail-qg0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42FF61AD218 for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 13:14:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by qgeb1 with SMTP id b1so45063563qge.1 for ; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 13:14:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=QgZOoLSTCOqKad6OrY6si+628D0upeDI2ukD6eZgA2c=; b=VOURNm74yNRX2oej7Inisj8RUnznhDazPJu96JDAbUkuHStCCUhmyWGBFYjL6EF0NI 0uZhi3KNc5QtOpNhohMv9xxfDzhRxRKSI26Pc5mQsHK7Wt6aEdrz6TeQJ7kdSt06/Wza 7zCTb0HCtC1r2IQyubscT4ItZ0JqToZvNMJWVSPLRQD/+Qx6K2bXho7ikpQQXtoaS0z6 16i5hwrR7C5voIIq+w4qOMYP4E5502Q9KqHZotScB4/S7sx8QuCjbjP5a0weC0Qs5bdU G4f5fPcNjn5hLkc0UHWK4aePNFB44uuh6GoJ4diJZcPFvAF8JpNSKwxOt40MB4NW2vG8 wneQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.141.5.136 with SMTP id h130mr7065495qhd.47.1449090860509; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 13:14:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.55.124.5 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 13:14:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 22:14:20 +0100 Message-ID: From: Zhen Cao To: int-dir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis@tools.ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Archived-At: Cc: "Bernie Volz \(volz\)" Subject: [Int-dir] Int-Dir review of draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 21:14:23 -0000 Hi Authors, "I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see http://www.ietf.org/iesg/directorate.html." The document present minor but clear &necessary updates to RFC5205. I find the document is ready. One editorial suggestion in the Appendix A as below. This could help developers to identify the delta text a bit easier. o Extended DNS HIP RR to support for Host Identities based on Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA). [Section 5.5] o Clarified that new query must be made when the time that passed since a RR was retrieved exceeds the TTL of the RR. [Section 4.2] o Added considerations related to multiple HIP RRs being associated with a single name. [Section 4.2] -Zhen From nobody Fri Dec 4 01:41:24 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 422881A1BA2; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 01:41:23 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EmbzdksOPk7j; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 01:41:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 874E31A1B56; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 01:41:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CEZ76851; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 09:41:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.34) by lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 09:41:15 +0000 Received: from NKGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.181]) by nkgeml403-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.34]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 17:41:13 +0800 From: Sheng Jiang To: "" , "Bernie Volz (volz)" Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-07 Thread-Index: AdEud+VMp/J1J6CDQtS6/WIbdBdddA== Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 09:41:12 +0000 Message-ID: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B927BC17E7C@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.99.197] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090202.56615FBE.0164, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.7.181, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 6a073e72ce73dfd5301a0a81f0320620 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis.all@ietf.org" Subject: [Int-dir] draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-07 X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 09:41:23 -0000 IkkgYW0gYW4gYXNzaWduZWQgSU5UIGRpcmVjdG9yYXRlIHJldmlld2VyIGZvciBkcmFmdC1pZXRm LWhpcC1yZmM1MjA0LWJpcw0KVGhlc2UgY29tbWVudHMgd2VyZSB3cml0dGVuIHByaW1hcmlseSBm b3IgdGhlIGJlbmVmaXQgb2YgdGhlIEludGVybmV0DQpBcmVhIERpcmVjdG9ycy4gRG9jdW1lbnQg ZWRpdG9ycyBhbmQgc2hlcGhlcmQocykgc2hvdWxkIHRyZWF0IHRoZXNlDQpjb21tZW50cyBqdXN0 IGxpa2UgdGhleSB3b3VsZCB0cmVhdCBjb21tZW50cyBmcm9tIGFueSBvdGhlciBJRVRGDQpjb250 cmlidXRvcnMgYW5kIHJlc29sdmUgdGhlbSBhbG9uZyB3aXRoIGFueSBvdGhlciBMYXN0IENhbGwg Y29tbWVudHMNCnRoYXQgaGF2ZSBiZWVuIHJlY2VpdmVkLiBGb3IgbW9yZSBkZXRhaWxzIG9uIHRo ZSBJTlQgRGlyZWN0b3JhdGUsDQpzZWUgaHR0cDovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9pZXNnL2RpcmVjdG9y YXRlLmh0bWwuIg0KDQpUaGlzIHN0YW5kYXJkIHRyYWNrIGRvY3VtZW50IG9ic29sZXRlcyBSRkM1 MjA1LCB3aGljaCB3YXMgDQpFeHBlcmltZW50YWwuIEkgZ3Vlc3MgdGhpcyBuZWVkIHN1cHBvcnQg ZnJvbSB2YXJpb3VzIGltcGxlbWVudGF0aW9uIA0KYW5kIGludGVyLW9wZXJhdGlvbmFsIHRlc3Rz LiBJIHBlcnNvbmFsbHkgZG9uJ3Qga25vdyB0aGVtLCBidXQgSSBndWVzcyANCnRoZXkgYWxyZWFk eSB0b29rIHBsYWNlLiBUaGUgZG9jdW1lbnQgaXMgd2VsbCB3cml0dGVuIGFuZCByZWFkeSBmb3Ig DQpwdWJsaWNhdGlvbi4NCg0KVGhpcyBiaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgaGFzIG9ubHkgbGl0dGxlIGRpZmZl cmVudCBmcm9tIHRoZSBvcmlnaW5hbCBkb2N1bWVudDogDQptYWlubHkgdGhyZWUgbW9yZSBwYXJh Z3JhcGhzLCB0d28gaW4gc2VjdGlvbiA0LjIgYW5kIG9uZSBpbiBzZWN0aW9uIDUuNS4NClRoZXkg bG9va3MgZ29vZC4gQSBjb3VwbGUgb2YgbWlub3IgY29tbWVudHM6DQoNCkVudGlyeS8vZW50aXR5 LCBpbiAybmQgcGFyYWdyYXBoIG9mIHNlY3Rpb24gNC4yLCAidGhlIHJlY29yZCBNVVNUIGJlIA0K Y29uc2lkZXJlZCB0byBiZSBubyBsb25nZXIgdmFsaWQgYW5kIGRlbGV0ZWQgYnkgdGhlIGVudGly eSB0aGF0IHJldHJpZXZlZCBpdCINCg0KVGhlIGFiYnJldmlhdGlvbiAiSFBJSEkiIGluIHNlY3Rp b24gNiBoYXMgbm8gZXhwbGFuYXRpb24gb3IgbG9uZyBuYW1lIA0Kd2hlbiBpdCBhcHBlYXJzIGZp cnN0IHRpbWUuDQoNClJlZ2FyZHMsDQoNClNoZW5nDQo= From nobody Fri Dec 4 01:46:19 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC5081A6F8B; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 01:46:17 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sgZbio7fgc-d; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 01:46:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 061B31A8A1F; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 01:46:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CBE32731; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 09:46:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.33) by lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 09:46:12 +0000 Received: from NKGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.181]) by nkgeml402-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.33]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 17:46:05 +0800 From: Sheng Jiang To: "" , "Bernie Volz (volz)" Thread-Topic: Int-Dir review of draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis-06 Thread-Index: AdEueJKduZGAOVolSjG3gS5geSZaEg== Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 09:46:04 +0000 Message-ID: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B927BC17E8B@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.99.197] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A090201.566160E6.0006, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.7.181, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: c80efe2ce4b107370e424ecd1ef0a303 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis.all@ietf.org" Subject: [Int-dir] Int-Dir review of draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis-06 X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 09:46:17 -0000 IkkgYW0gYW4gYXNzaWduZWQgSU5UIGRpcmVjdG9yYXRlIHJldmlld2VyIGZvciBkcmFmdC1pZXRm LWhpcC1yZmM1MjA0LWJpcw0KVGhlc2UgY29tbWVudHMgd2VyZSB3cml0dGVuIHByaW1hcmlseSBm b3IgdGhlIGJlbmVmaXQgb2YgdGhlIEludGVybmV0DQpBcmVhIERpcmVjdG9ycy4gRG9jdW1lbnQg ZWRpdG9ycyBhbmQgc2hlcGhlcmQocykgc2hvdWxkIHRyZWF0IHRoZXNlDQpjb21tZW50cyBqdXN0 IGxpa2UgdGhleSB3b3VsZCB0cmVhdCBjb21tZW50cyBmcm9tIGFueSBvdGhlciBJRVRGDQpjb250 cmlidXRvcnMgYW5kIHJlc29sdmUgdGhlbSBhbG9uZyB3aXRoIGFueSBvdGhlciBMYXN0IENhbGwg Y29tbWVudHMNCnRoYXQgaGF2ZSBiZWVuIHJlY2VpdmVkLiBGb3IgbW9yZSBkZXRhaWxzIG9uIHRo ZSBJTlQgRGlyZWN0b3JhdGUsDQpzZWUgaHR0cDovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9pZXNnL2RpcmVjdG9y YXRlLmh0bWwuIg0KDQpUaGlzIHN0YW5kYXJkIHRyYWNrIGRvY3VtZW50IG9ic29sZXRlcyBSRkM1 MjA0LCB3aGljaCB3YXMgDQpFeHBlcmltZW50YWwuIEkgZ3Vlc3MgdGhpcyBuZWVkIHN1cHBvcnQg ZnJvbSB2YXJpb3VzIGltcGxlbWVudGF0aW9uIA0KYW5kIGludGVyLW9wZXJhdGlvbmFsIHRlc3Rz LiBJIHBlcnNvbmFsbHkgZG9uJ3Qga25vdyB0aGVtLCBidXQgSSBndWVzcyANCnRoZXkgYWxyZWFk eSB0b29rIHBsYWNlLiBUaGUgZG9jdW1lbnQgaXMgd2VsbCB3cml0dGVuIGFuZCByZWFkeSBmb3Ig DQpwdWJsaWNhdGlvbi4NCg0KVGhpcyBiaXMgZG9jdW1lbnQgaGFzIG9ubHkgbGl0dGxlIGRpZmZl cmVudCBmcm9tIHRoZSBvcmlnaW5hbCBkb2N1bWVudDogDQptYWlubHkgdHdvIHNlbnRlbmNlcyBz ZWN0aW9uIDQuMi4yLiBUaGUgbmV3IHRleHQgbG9va3MgZ29vZC4NCg0KUmVnYXJkcywNCg0KU2hl bmcNCg== From nobody Mon Dec 7 17:50:24 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6166B1A9112; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 17:36:40 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.658 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.658 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DATE_IN_PAST_06_12=1.543, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id STb8xnDFURcn; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 17:36:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from sesbmg23.ericsson.net (sesbmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBB6C1A910E; Sun, 6 Dec 2015 17:36:34 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-f79876d0000011ee-a4-5664e2a0632b Received: from ESESSHC002.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.24]) by sesbmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 88.57.04590.0A2E4665; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 02:36:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from [131.160.126.109] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.248.2; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 02:36:31 +0100 To: Sheng Jiang , "" , "Bernie Volz (volz)" , Julien Laganier References: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B927BC17E7C@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> From: Gonzalo Camarillo Message-ID: <56646B2B.3040402@ericsson.com> Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2015 19:06:51 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B927BC17E7C@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrOLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2K7hO6CRylhBlfXqVuce7qP3eLRlW4W i4Xr1zJbHO1tYbJYPkPTgdVjyu+NrB47Z91l92g58pbVY8mSn0wBLFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglc Ga/+3GMtWMBdcffVKeYGxkbOLkZODgkBE4n/DauZIGwxiQv31rOB2EIChxklrnTFdzFyAdlr GCU+7TrFCJIQFtCSuL1/LSNIQkRgBaPEzPkfWCE6QiX+TtwC1s0sECnx/s5CZhCbTcBCYsut +ywgNq+AtsSlzSvZQWwWARWJJQf6wWpEBWIk3m9axQhRIyhxcuYTsHpOgTCJWcsWA83nAJqp KbF+lz7EeHmJ7W/nMEOs1ZZY/qyFZQKj4Cwk3bMQOmYh6VjAyLyKUbQ4tTgpN93IWC+1KDO5 uDg/Ty8vtWQTIzC4D275rbqD8fIbx0OMAhyMSjy8G1pTwoRYE8uKK3MPMUpwMCuJ8ArHAYV4 UxIrq1KL8uOLSnNSiw8xSnOwKInzNjM9CBUSSE8sSc1OTS1ILYLJMnFwSjUwTth4ss32wIWL HVUXJr3rrp03d/LkVbbhojyZpluDcx5+Mther752g+9LJZ7f265v+8rn4hv5+9uHhZx3X7Bp Gyrwa0hGmMlMS7I/Wq82oSf0ttW9cDH+z7b8h30T7JoOdU/b8XfeQV2307lp8jsSbwfNkPz/ tWXC9PX6cmsle/flBj7UUH80R4mlOCPRUIu5qDgRAGtxW/1qAgAA Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 17:50:23 -0800 Cc: "draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis.all@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Int-dir] draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-07 X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 01:36:40 -0000 Hi Julien, could you please look into the review below and address the comments? Thanks, Gonzalo On 04/12/2015 11:41 AM, Sheng Jiang wrote: > "I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis > These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet > Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these > comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF > contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments > that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, > see http://www.ietf.org/iesg/directorate.html." > > This standard track document obsoletes RFC5205, which was > Experimental. I guess this need support from various implementation > and inter-operational tests. I personally don't know them, but I guess > they already took place. The document is well written and ready for > publication. > > This bis document has only little different from the original document: > mainly three more paragraphs, two in section 4.2 and one in section 5.5. > They looks good. A couple of minor comments: > > Entiry//entity, in 2nd paragraph of section 4.2, "the record MUST be > considered to be no longer valid and deleted by the entiry that retrieved it" > > The abbreviation "HPIHI" in section 6 has no explanation or long name > when it appears first time. > > Regards, > > Sheng > From nobody Mon Dec 14 07:56:37 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36FF11A1AB5; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 06:20:40 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -104.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dJi22GulUnsS; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 06:20:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from sessmg22.ericsson.net (sessmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.58]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2C4F1A1AB2; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 06:20:36 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: c1b4fb3a-f79df6d0000013b1-69-566ed032fbe5 Received: from ESESSHC022.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.84]) by sessmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id FB.53.05041.230DE665; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 15:20:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from [131.160.126.219] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.86) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.248.2; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 15:20:34 +0100 To: Sheng Jiang , "" , "Bernie Volz (volz)" , Julien Laganier References: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B927BC17E7C@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <56646B2B.3040402@ericsson.com> From: Gonzalo Camarillo Message-ID: <566ED031.8040703@ericsson.com> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 16:20:33 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56646B2B.3040402@ericsson.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrGLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2J7iK7Rhbwwg53X1S3OPd3HbvHoSjeL xcL1a5ktjva2MFksn6HpwOox5fdGVo+ds+6ye7QcecvqsWTJT6YAligum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSu jHtNS9kLXvNU/Jy8lbGBcSlXFyMHh4SAicS8dzldjJxAppjEhXvr2boYuTiEBA4zSjROOwHl rGWUeHnvFyNIlbCAlsTt/WsZQRIiAisYJWbO/8AKkhASKJfouDOfDcRmFoiUeH9nITOIzSZg IbHl1n0WkG28AtoSe/+ngYRZBFQldvzdyARiiwrESDxevBVsDK+AoMTJmU9YQGxOAR2JyRsu MoK0MgtoSqzfpQ8xXV5i+9s5zBBbtSWWP2thmcAoOAtJ9yyEjllIOhYwMq9iFC1OLS7OTTcy 0kstykwuLs7P08tLLdnECAztg1t+W+1gPPjc8RCjAAejEg+vwYHcMCHWxLLiytxDjBIczEoi vD3L8sKEeFMSK6tSi/Lji0pzUosPMUpzsCiJ8zYzPQgVEkhPLEnNTk0tSC2CyTJxcEo1MNbH nTmgqHjvWd+5dE+zFQ12x15wzrCQVI7PzLA8dtZkuXtBzpwepvIdTsq/Fi5+N1nv1sMST47e Ku1VJ29+z+VfeeDOLssPKvc5tu+rKO2XPqThxmnQeTbfhMNZTajSc815C1t/hvkz4/RZI54p X3mz9vCDKQZ2Vm/uzldalLt0ttI6JyUWNyWW4oxEQy3mouJEAKLAV2xpAgAA Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 07:56:36 -0800 Cc: "draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis.all@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Int-dir] draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-07 X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 14:20:40 -0000 Hi Julien, could you please acknowledge this review and fix the typos in your sources? Thanks, Gonzalo On 06/12/2015 7:06 PM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: > Hi Julien, > > could you please look into the review below and address the comments? > > Thanks, > > Gonzalo > > On 04/12/2015 11:41 AM, Sheng Jiang wrote: >> "I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis >> These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet >> Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these >> comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF >> contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments >> that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, >> see http://www.ietf.org/iesg/directorate.html." >> >> This standard track document obsoletes RFC5205, which was >> Experimental. I guess this need support from various implementation >> and inter-operational tests. I personally don't know them, but I guess >> they already took place. The document is well written and ready for >> publication. >> >> This bis document has only little different from the original document: >> mainly three more paragraphs, two in section 4.2 and one in section 5.5. >> They looks good. A couple of minor comments: >> >> Entiry//entity, in 2nd paragraph of section 4.2, "the record MUST be >> considered to be no longer valid and deleted by the entiry that retrieved it" >> >> The abbreviation "HPIHI" in section 6 has no explanation or long name >> when it appears first time. >> >> Regards, >> >> Sheng >> From nobody Mon Dec 14 08:06:29 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA3C41A87C7; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 08:05:43 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ozi5do0LuIgO; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 08:05:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qk0-x235.google.com (mail-qk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BE2B1A88EC; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 08:04:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by qkfb125 with SMTP id b125so141405600qkf.2; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 08:04:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=TL6KJHhh6yOlP0TeymoWyLXavjL70LW6EodKDjyjzZs=; b=f+uLkmQTC6YPQd8K53Ggmy64eR/2Eo5GH93dOmFPpRgRfeEVd13apL7qZAbBS/n5+c 3TdEB+9worLuHI/+KXA69Pq/4GBYW+BoBQuXSYCBhhv6S2xzPN8lEf9OhWEM/NDdpqiw n7Sq3gszdPXap0SWd9pjcm/ppUBa5Gc1rE3AUDELEViBzBYPM/Czg7iI+rfuj+sQtzzw ddppxAnCFL3GH4EEIIgHBsxFOpqndpeIqDH+YSuxQCORK45ZibRDES7yKOAGnQPTE5x+ yfj+CZKrppYp9VNsc7ZNrnA4f7eFXmIm+OoXtLW+S/AvCxdLqZUOB1We4BUjA4YCJQkB XTKA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.129.78.81 with SMTP id c78mr1153558ywb.248.1450109097136; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 08:04:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.13.226.198 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 08:04:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B927BC17E7C@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B927BC17E7C@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 08:04:57 -0800 Message-ID: From: Julien Laganier To: Sheng Jiang Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 08:06:28 -0800 Cc: "draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis.all@ietf.org" , "Bernie Volz \(volz\)" , "" Subject: Re: [Int-dir] draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-07 X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 16:05:43 -0000 Hi Sheng, Thank you for reviewing the document. I will post an update addressing your comments ASAP. W.r.t. to the abbreviation HPIHI, it's a typo in a deprecated name of the HIPHI resource record. I should read HIP instead of HPIHI. Best, --julien On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 1:41 AM, Sheng Jiang wrote: > "I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis > These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet > Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these > comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF > contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments > that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, > see http://www.ietf.org/iesg/directorate.html." > > This standard track document obsoletes RFC5205, which was > Experimental. I guess this need support from various implementation > and inter-operational tests. I personally don't know them, but I guess > they already took place. The document is well written and ready for > publication. > > This bis document has only little different from the original document: > mainly three more paragraphs, two in section 4.2 and one in section 5.5. > They looks good. A couple of minor comments: > > Entiry//entity, in 2nd paragraph of section 4.2, "the record MUST be > considered to be no longer valid and deleted by the entiry that retrieved it" > > The abbreviation "HPIHI" in section 6 has no explanation or long name > when it appears first time. > > Regards, > > Sheng From nobody Mon Dec 14 16:41:08 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EFF61A8956; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 16:41:07 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pwjE7BPiJPQ6; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 16:41:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67CD01A893C; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 16:41:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CFL29481; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 00:41:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LHREML707-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.199) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 00:41:01 +0000 Received: from NKGEML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.32) by lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.199) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 00:41:01 +0000 Received: from NKGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.181]) by nkgeml401-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.32]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 08:40:56 +0800 From: Sheng Jiang To: Julien Laganier Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-07 Thread-Index: AdEud+VMp/J1J6CDQtS6/WIbdBdddAHzjnuAACLEiEA= Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 00:40:55 +0000 Message-ID: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B927BC1F4A0@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B927BC17E7C@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-GB, zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.99.197] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020203.566F619E.00F3, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.7.181, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 459ba63f622f3dd8bd4aba58913da6a0 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis.all@ietf.org" , "Bernie Volz \(volz\)" , "" Subject: Re: [Int-dir] draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-07 X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 00:41:07 -0000 SGksIEp1bGllbiwNCg0KVGhhbmsgZm9yIHJlc3BvbnNlIGFuZCBhZGRyZXNzIG15IGNvbW1lbnRz Lg0KDQpSZWdhcmRzLA0KDQpTaGVuZw0KDQo+LS0tLS1PcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCj5G cm9tOiBKdWxpZW4gTGFnYW5pZXIgW21haWx0bzpqdWxpZW4uaWV0ZkBnbWFpbC5jb21dDQo+U2Vu dDogVHVlc2RheSwgRGVjZW1iZXIgMTUsIDIwMTUgMTI6MDUgQU0NCj5UbzogU2hlbmcgSmlhbmcN Cj5DYzogPGludC1kaXJAaWV0Zi5vcmc+OyBCZXJuaWUgVm9seiAodm9seik7DQo+ZHJhZnQtaWV0 Zi1oaXAtcmZjNTIwNC1iaXMuYWxsQGlldGYub3JnDQo+U3ViamVjdDogUmU6IGRyYWZ0LWlldGYt aGlwLXJmYzUyMDUtYmlzLTA3DQo+DQo+SGkgU2hlbmcsDQo+DQo+VGhhbmsgeW91IGZvciByZXZp ZXdpbmcgdGhlIGRvY3VtZW50LiBJIHdpbGwgcG9zdCBhbiB1cGRhdGUgYWRkcmVzc2luZw0KPnlv dXIgY29tbWVudHMgQVNBUC4gVy5yLnQuIHRvIHRoZSBhYmJyZXZpYXRpb24gSFBJSEksIGl0J3Mg YSB0eXBvIGluIGENCj5kZXByZWNhdGVkIG5hbWUgb2YgdGhlIEhJUEhJIHJlc291cmNlIHJlY29y ZC4gSSBzaG91bGQgcmVhZCBISVANCj5pbnN0ZWFkIG9mIEhQSUhJLg0KPg0KPkJlc3QsDQo+DQo+ LS1qdWxpZW4NCj4NCj5PbiBGcmksIERlYyA0LCAyMDE1IGF0IDE6NDEgQU0sIFNoZW5nIEppYW5n IDxqaWFuZ3NoZW5nQGh1YXdlaS5jb20+DQo+d3JvdGU6DQo+PiAiSSBhbSBhbiBhc3NpZ25lZCBJ TlQgZGlyZWN0b3JhdGUgcmV2aWV3ZXIgZm9yIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtaGlwLXJmYzUyMDQtYmlzDQo+ PiBUaGVzZSBjb21tZW50cyB3ZXJlIHdyaXR0ZW4gcHJpbWFyaWx5IGZvciB0aGUgYmVuZWZpdCBv ZiB0aGUgSW50ZXJuZXQNCj4+IEFyZWEgRGlyZWN0b3JzLiBEb2N1bWVudCBlZGl0b3JzIGFuZCBz aGVwaGVyZChzKSBzaG91bGQgdHJlYXQgdGhlc2UNCj4+IGNvbW1lbnRzIGp1c3QgbGlrZSB0aGV5 IHdvdWxkIHRyZWF0IGNvbW1lbnRzIGZyb20gYW55IG90aGVyIElFVEYNCj4+IGNvbnRyaWJ1dG9y cyBhbmQgcmVzb2x2ZSB0aGVtIGFsb25nIHdpdGggYW55IG90aGVyIExhc3QgQ2FsbCBjb21tZW50 cw0KPj4gdGhhdCBoYXZlIGJlZW4gcmVjZWl2ZWQuIEZvciBtb3JlIGRldGFpbHMgb24gdGhlIElO VCBEaXJlY3RvcmF0ZSwNCj4+IHNlZSBodHRwOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL2llc2cvZGlyZWN0b3Jh dGUuaHRtbC4iDQo+Pg0KPj4gVGhpcyBzdGFuZGFyZCB0cmFjayBkb2N1bWVudCBvYnNvbGV0ZXMg UkZDNTIwNSwgd2hpY2ggd2FzDQo+PiBFeHBlcmltZW50YWwuIEkgZ3Vlc3MgdGhpcyBuZWVkIHN1 cHBvcnQgZnJvbSB2YXJpb3VzIGltcGxlbWVudGF0aW9uDQo+PiBhbmQgaW50ZXItb3BlcmF0aW9u YWwgdGVzdHMuIEkgcGVyc29uYWxseSBkb24ndCBrbm93IHRoZW0sIGJ1dCBJIGd1ZXNzDQo+PiB0 aGV5IGFscmVhZHkgdG9vayBwbGFjZS4gVGhlIGRvY3VtZW50IGlzIHdlbGwgd3JpdHRlbiBhbmQg cmVhZHkgZm9yDQo+PiBwdWJsaWNhdGlvbi4NCj4+DQo+PiBUaGlzIGJpcyBkb2N1bWVudCBoYXMg b25seSBsaXR0bGUgZGlmZmVyZW50IGZyb20gdGhlIG9yaWdpbmFsIGRvY3VtZW50Og0KPj4gbWFp bmx5IHRocmVlIG1vcmUgcGFyYWdyYXBocywgdHdvIGluIHNlY3Rpb24gNC4yIGFuZCBvbmUgaW4g c2VjdGlvbiA1LjUuDQo+PiBUaGV5IGxvb2tzIGdvb2QuIEEgY291cGxlIG9mIG1pbm9yIGNvbW1l bnRzOg0KPj4NCj4+IEVudGlyeS8vZW50aXR5LCBpbiAybmQgcGFyYWdyYXBoIG9mIHNlY3Rpb24g NC4yLCAidGhlIHJlY29yZCBNVVNUIGJlDQo+PiBjb25zaWRlcmVkIHRvIGJlIG5vIGxvbmdlciB2 YWxpZCBhbmQgZGVsZXRlZCBieSB0aGUgZW50aXJ5IHRoYXQgcmV0cmlldmVkIGl0Ig0KPj4NCj4+ IFRoZSBhYmJyZXZpYXRpb24gIkhQSUhJIiBpbiBzZWN0aW9uIDYgaGFzIG5vIGV4cGxhbmF0aW9u IG9yIGxvbmcgbmFtZQ0KPj4gd2hlbiBpdCBhcHBlYXJzIGZpcnN0IHRpbWUuDQo+Pg0KPj4gUmVn YXJkcywNCj4+DQo+PiBTaGVuZw0K