From nobody Fri Aug 28 09:28:52 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietf.org Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E6173A0DDD; Fri, 28 Aug 2020 09:28:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ralf Weber via Datatracker To: Cc: last-call@ietf.org, bess@ietf.org, draft-ietf-bess-evpn-na-flags.all@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.15.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <159863212946.29977.4750468830482943318@ietfa.amsl.com> Reply-To: Ralf Weber Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 09:28:49 -0700 Archived-At: Subject: [Int-dir] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-na-flags-05 X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2020 16:28:50 -0000 Reviewer: Ralf Weber Review result: Ready Moin! I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-na-flags. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more details on the INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/ The draft does a very good job explaining the motivation, definition and use of the extended community flags with good and applicable examples. I personally would have used stronger (MUST) language for the R and O bits set to 0 on the IPv4->MAC transmission (3.1 sub point 2), but as these are optional anyway and must be ignored by the receiver it really makes no difference. So long -Ralf From nobody Mon Aug 31 01:54:22 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 272BC3A1127; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 01:54:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.901 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d4bwMjvDYYCw; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 01:54:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from NAM04-BN3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr680124.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.68.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E5553A1126; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 01:54:16 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=oY+pKXolcZz3UqEb6yNUhVKYW8euTIQr/kkndqO9+/yFpxGlahJ01cPKG0CqGC2UBLRFFDrMWeaZctiijXY/1QKZ7CAq3wxumeUzigONh7bLVCs15+cGRBP/fPHtj0g9B+SBouumCxExsMUYeDQPI4qoHusbUDm36r4xSPRIt8S2k4bWoHSYNJOPWlzUmn9KafqP3MvvxCWaqGD4gjIQS3QOOfdYtD1clvRiWpNYy2ZC+9o3S8YExxFJFqSUg8/MJyt3ql9z/70QlQohFb1mJ3HPVMLPr5LWPQhgDfyxjDB1XWYUHtcgZf4LD3hvIszgLOV6Az/51CWH2qqiconwFQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=poHF4QKk5wIrXOfaTfZs92M79b1xmsnYYQE10JefuFM=; b=YLeBIL7GZGEsMoJYRk5H0oMSl1l6d/giI5iBaOza11KGNtZK7xuN3KlvmKP9XcmdEZMi3mWRBS/gZiDwdrOu1W2KwcDCLNVDMTnqH5GBeakA6Bl7GP9g4e9oTmQ6augmWncTE7TC7CXDyJLzETjAqFg1ZqeVczwM47OI1nuPpldV6JZ4TA9xNBLFSlGSJS50I+Gvsn2HmU9pUOA6YlIDpJZ7+ckgv9yNd/FZwfjg6bu8hdawX4fxls25HwF3r+HkzocIREcDMuIce8T+bSKcZSYV0mo4TkMuH+p9g1e1a/PxE4SNGuCMPTLdj/zpAk3F1qUExrl/S6qiq3IQFph5QQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nokia.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nokia.com; dkim=pass header.d=nokia.com; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-nokia-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=poHF4QKk5wIrXOfaTfZs92M79b1xmsnYYQE10JefuFM=; b=veDecf1Acvo3hbUHCz0xid5CD+1Qiv7cdmDPGwCwbWF/duFHny0Tp71nu5FoUx2Ab957AW1FEjZTK+sI4c343vX45LUZB9HsKMXT8GiLCylCEbe4Q+ZiB08r0nqeUTGqDWsjQBOWy0aOGeHeK1gH8HSl8sUPAaHu5E3UmM9Kviw= Received: from MWHPR08MB3520.namprd08.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:301:61::15) by MWHPR08MB3408.namprd08.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:301:66::10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3326.25; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:54:14 +0000 Received: from MWHPR08MB3520.namprd08.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::19d8:bf7f:5bfa:e391]) by MWHPR08MB3520.namprd08.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::19d8:bf7f:5bfa:e391%4]) with mapi id 15.20.3326.025; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:54:14 +0000 From: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" To: Ralf Weber , "int-dir@ietf.org" CC: "last-call@ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-bess-evpn-na-flags.all@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [bess] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-na-flags-05 Thread-Index: AQHWfVhZnPXtRROjvE2XJpo5pU5GZqlR7XTD Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:54:13 +0000 Message-ID: References: <159863212946.29977.4750468830482943318@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <159863212946.29977.4750468830482943318@ietfa.amsl.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: akamai.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;akamai.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=nokia.com; x-originating-ip: [135.245.20.5] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 03f0d3f8-ed12-435f-0a4e-08d84d8b6f8e x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MWHPR08MB3408: x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508; x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: pkp1hRzTLQoGmC32HGR8qgdQjDMZE+GbN9hFB8HYhYj+6TYxNWnC30aSgXOgJgap3UoQ/5BptKDNcI3hfOYJYODf8d4/M8AAKAH8k8O6Th0ccDOfUuJuiuGCdMDOpgChOZzP8jtQP4Ia3aRriCmpkGSNquNMDD6KY6sFx90liH8+3hLux3S9PtuVo8vI7GaJKGpmZNq0SX87kK5XCkvhOesFEAp7oMLM7Yc29ZIQ7y7c6dgR7nS8BkrtTNrOOmvJmrmJ3rHETWh2CDy57Mzmfp2Inv+yGjF4VoXWKZLlkXxVdHvqLDrO7QzlbyG3NH4peT70w2wYJSk4qBwSfOeIysLRu3hACQYc1iMhJnGfO50Rk+edOPe0vQ7RWwXpGcDqqjiOR5RVzhoWIUPFA14D+w== x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:MWHPR08MB3520.namprd08.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(4636009)(39850400004)(396003)(376002)(136003)(366004)(346002)(66476007)(66946007)(76116006)(66556008)(6506007)(186003)(66446008)(26005)(478600001)(53546011)(9686003)(966005)(86362001)(2906002)(55016002)(71200400001)(33656002)(316002)(4326008)(54906003)(66574015)(8676002)(7696005)(64756008)(8936002)(110136005)(52536014)(5660300002)(166002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MWHPR08MB352050AD7EC0BA5A929E302AF7510MWHPR08MB3520namp_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: nokia.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: MWHPR08MB3520.namprd08.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 03f0d3f8-ed12-435f-0a4e-08d84d8b6f8e X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 31 Aug 2020 08:54:13.8388 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5d471751-9675-428d-917b-70f44f9630b0 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: dOXdcjJ7oUEhgaAovYlc9u33WcSjYCQII4jjCZ8eJuBMzXVwpeMGd2We0Pfnkf4nSptN3eaUaQ3iFtqQPpD3Jg== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MWHPR08MB3408 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Int-dir] [bess] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-na-flags-05 X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:54:18 -0000 --_000_MWHPR08MB352050AD7EC0BA5A929E302AF7510MWHPR08MB3520namp_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thank you for reviewing, Ralf. We=92ll leave the current normative language then. If anyone else has stron= g opinions about it, we can discuss it. Jorge From: BESS Date: Friday, August 28, 2020 at 6:29 PM To: int-dir@ietf.org Cc: last-call@ietf.org , bess@ietf.org ,= draft-ietf-bess-evpn-na-flags.all@ietf.org Subject: [bess] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-na-flags-05 Reviewer: Ralf Weber Review result: Ready Moin! I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-na-flags= . These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments jus= t like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For m= ore details on the INT Directorate, see https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/ The draft does a very good job explaining the motivation, definition and us= e of the extended community flags with good and applicable examples. I personall= y would have used stronger (MUST) language for the R and O bits set to 0 on t= he IPv4->MAC transmission (3.1 sub point 2), but as these are optional anyway = and must be ignored by the receiver it really makes no difference. So long -Ralf _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list BESS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess --_000_MWHPR08MB352050AD7EC0BA5A929E302AF7510MWHPR08MB3520namp_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thank you for reviewing, Ralf.

We=92ll leave the current normative language then. If anyone else has str= ong opinions about it, we can discuss it.

 

Jorge

 

From: BESS <bess-bounces@ietf.org>
Date: Friday, August 28, 2020 at 6:29 PM
To: int-dir@ietf.org <int-dir@ietf.org>
Cc: last-call@ietf.org <last-call@ietf.org>, bess@ietf.org <= ;bess@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-bess-evpn-na-flags.all@ietf.org <draft-ie= tf-bess-evpn-na-flags.all@ietf.org>
Subject: [bess] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-na-f= lags-05

Reviewer: Ralf Weber Review result: Ready

Moin!

I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-na-flags= .

These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area<= br> Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments jus= t
like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve=
them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For m= ore
details on the INT Directorate, see
https://datatr= acker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/

The draft does a very good job explaining the motivation, definition and us= e of
the extended community flags with good and applicable examples. I personall= y
would have used stronger (MUST) language for the R and O bits set to 0 on t= he
IPv4->MAC transmission (3.1 sub point 2), but as these are optional anyw= ay and
must be ignored by the receiver it really makes no difference.

So long
-Ralf



_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org= /mailman/listinfo/bess

--_000_MWHPR08MB352050AD7EC0BA5A929E302AF7510MWHPR08MB3520namp_--