From nobody Sat May 9 21:04:31 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A75A1A000F for ; Sat, 9 May 2015 21:04:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.112 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.112 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bT_nXb2aecMp for ; Sat, 9 May 2015 21:04:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx4.auckland.ac.nz (mx4.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.125.248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86BE31A000D for ; Sat, 9 May 2015 21:04:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=auckland.ac.nz; i=@auckland.ac.nz; q=dns/txt; s=uoa; t=1431230667; x=1462766667; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to; bh=kD/anU0ipjoMMJITIR+UinZ6aa8xR+XYgyqFVGT0PUQ=; b=VSXvOi/3rz3JZPSgvdZOUuI/dMqV1Fz/J+aC6DH9RUtdBG1aShr0tttE QVGTCrf4QR193MIsw4EkS+1UIuRPi1sOCpFmmpj+fOoCfe6SokNWIH4K+ /4ASKj2mSpGovOrF9iVuexl2hGj/ozgjoJuBvW1HTyoYhJD9pQg9+529t s=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.13,399,1427713200"; d="txt'?scan'208"; a="3952775" X-Ironport-HAT: None - $RELAY-AUTH X-Ironport-Source: 121.99.27.13 - Outgoing - Outgoing-SSL Received: from 121-99-27-13.bng1.nct.orcon.net.nz (HELO [192.168.20.7]) ([121.99.27.13]) by mx4-int.auckland.ac.nz with ESMTP; 10 May 2015 16:04:24 +1200 Message-ID: <554ED8C8.4060406@auckland.ac.nz> Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 16:04:24 +1200 From: Nevil Brownlee User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: IPFIX list References: In-Reply-To: X-Forwarded-Message-Id: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------010206010404050903000207" Archived-At: Subject: [IPFIX] Fwd: Network Measurements Workshop at LCN 2015 X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 04:04:31 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010206010404050903000207 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Forwarding this CFP from one of my colleages ... Cheers, Nevil From: Aniket Mahanti To: Nevil Brownlee Nevil I am organizing a workshop on network measurements (http://wnm2015.csis.mtroyal.ca/) to be held with LCN 2015 in USA. We have extended the deadline by 2 weeks. The submission deadline is May 26, 2015. Can you please forward the CFP (attached) to your colleagues? This will help boost submissions to our workshop. Thanks Aniket --------------010206010404050903000207 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; name="WNM2015.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="WNM2015.txt" *****Deadline extended; new submission deadline May 26, 2015****** Call for Papers: IEEE WNM 2015 ================================================================================ 9th IEEE Workshop on Network Measurements (WNM) http://wnm2015.csis.mtroyal.ca/ co-located with 40th IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN) http://www.ieeelcn.org/ October 26-29, 2015, Clearwater, Florida, USA ================================================================================ IMPORTANT DATES * Paper Submission: *EXTENDED* May 26, 2015 * Notification: July 6, 2015 * Camera Ready: July 31, 2015 SCOPE The 9th IEEE Workshop on Network Measurements (WNM) will cover all measurement aspects of computer networking, services, and application. Mature and early works are welcome for submission, including new directions, intriguing approaches, and alternative approaches to the state-of-the-art methods. We seek submissions that treat all aspects of measurement across the networking stack, distributed applications and services and especially encourage works that involve new and emerging systems, applications, and environments. Virtualization and cloud technologies have become the norm in building new systems and services, while user-facing applications, including Web, are explicitly being designed for mobility first. In addition, emerging Internet of Things (IoT) and wearable devices pose new challenges as well as opportunities in design, integration, and deployment of systems. Recent standardization of HTTP/2 brings significant changes to the Web measurement and monitoring landscape, with explicit encryption challenging established approaches based HTTP header and payload inspection. One of the questions is whether known measurement and monitoring techniques are adequate and applicable in the future Web and cloud-based virtualized Internet infrastructure or we need novel approaches. We invite the measurement community to contribute original submissions that cover a broad range of topics in monitoring, measurement and analysis across wired and wireless networks: *Measurement tools, techniques, design, and evaluation *Measurement of new protocols such as HTTP/2, QUIC and similar alternatives *Measurement of emerging modes of communication such as NFC and spontaneous interaction of devices *Measurement for wearables and IoT *Measurement in Network Function Virtualization and Software-Defined Networking *Building Quality of Experience (QoE) metrics from network measurements *Measurement across the network protocol stack *Measurement related to performance, reliability, security and privacy *Data centers, cloud-based services and content distribution networks *Measurement-based monitoring and troubleshooting of large-scale distributed systems, including cloud infrastructures *Monitoring and measurement of home networks, including wireless streaming *Evaluation of emerging paradigms for traditional services (e.g. moving from circuit-switched phone to VoIP, high-definition voice/VoLTE, video over VoLTE, WebRTC) *Assessment of previous measurement works PAPER SUBMISSION The workshop seeks novel, previously unpublished papers, which are not currently under review by another conference, workshop, or journal. All submissions should be in PDF for-mat, written in English with a maximum paper length of eight printed pages (IEEE Trans-actions style double-column format, 10pt font size), including figures. The paper should include a brief abstract of up to 150 words. The submission will be han-dled via EDAS. The accepted papers will be published in the conference proceedings and will be available via the IEEE Xplore website. Please refer to workshop website for details: http://wnm2015.csis.mtroyal.ca/ ORGANIZATION Program Chairs Aniket Mahanti, University of Auckland, New Zealand Emir Halepovic, AT&T Labs - Research, USA Web Chair Mingwei Gong, Mount Royal University, Canada --------------010206010404050903000207-- From nobody Thu May 21 09:18:29 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E7F11A888B for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 09:18:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.912 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2YgSKZebbT8L for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 09:18:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEBED1A8865 for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 09:18:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 89DF3180452; Thu, 21 May 2015 09:16:40 -0700 (PDT) To: muenz@net.in.tum.de, bclaise@cisco.com, paitken@cisco.com, bclaise@cisco.com, joelja@bogus.com, n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz, quittek@neclab.eu X-PHP-Originating-Script: 6000:errata_mail_lib.php From: RFC Errata System Message-Id: <20150521161640.89DF3180452@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 09:16:40 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Cc: ipfix@ietf.org, mwd@cert.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [IPFIX] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6728 (4370) X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 16:18:28 -0000 The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6728, "Configuration Data Model for the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) and Packet Sampling (PSAMP) Protocols". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6728&eid=4370 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Michael Duggan Section: 4.8 Original Text ------------- isFlowKey: If this state parameter is present, this is a Flow Key field. This parameter is only available for non-Options Templates (i.e., if setId is 2). isFlowKey: If this state parameter is present, this is a scope field. This parameter is only available for Options Templates (i.e., if setId is 3). Corrected Text -------------- isFlowKey: If this state parameter is present, this is a Flow Key field. This parameter is only available for non-Options Templates (i.e., if setId is 2). isScope: If this state parameter is present, this is a scope field. This parameter is only available for Options Templates (i.e., if setId is 3). Notes ----- Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6728 (draft-ietf-ipfix-configuration-model-11) -------------------------------------- Title : Configuration Data Model for the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) and Packet Sampling (PSAMP) Protocols Publication Date : October 2012 Author(s) : G. Muenz, B. Claise, P. Aitken Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : IP Flow Information Export Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From nobody Thu May 21 09:24:16 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE4F1B2A52 for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 09:24:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.267 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.267 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aKyPbpUlJLJ9 for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 09:24:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx0a-000f0801.pphosted.com (mx0a-000f0801.pphosted.com [67.231.144.122]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B5561B2A4E for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 09:24:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0048193.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-000f0801.pphosted.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with SMTP id t4LGFMbV028008; Thu, 21 May 2015 09:24:04 -0700 Received: from hq1wp-exchub01.corp.brocade.com ([144.49.131.13]) by mx0a-000f0801.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 1uhjqkg0pu-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 21 May 2015 09:24:04 -0700 Received: from HQ1WP-EXMB12.corp.brocade.com (10.70.20.186) by HQ1WP-EXCHUB01.corp.brocade.com (10.70.36.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Thu, 21 May 2015 09:24:03 -0700 Received: from [172.29.21.24] (172.29.21.24) by HQ1WP-EXMB12.corp.brocade.com (10.70.20.186) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1044.25; Thu, 21 May 2015 09:24:00 -0700 Message-ID: <555E069E.50707@brocade.com> Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 17:23:58 +0100 From: Paul Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: RFC Errata System , "muenz@net.in.tum.de" , "bclaise@cisco.com" , "paitken@cisco.com" , "joelja@bogus.com" , "n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz" , "quittek@neclab.eu" References: <20150521161640.89DF3180452@rfc-editor.org> In-Reply-To: <20150521161640.89DF3180452@rfc-editor.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [172.29.21.24] X-ClientProxiedBy: hq1wp-excas12.corp.brocade.com (10.70.38.22) To HQ1WP-EXMB12.corp.brocade.com (10.70.20.186) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.14.151, 1.0.33, 0.0.0000 definitions=2015-05-21_05:2015-05-21,2015-05-21,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1402240000 definitions=main-1505210213 Archived-At: Cc: "mwd@cert.org" , "ipfix@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [IPFIX] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6728 (4370) X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 16:24:15 -0000 Good catch, Michael! P. On 21/05/15 17:16, RFC Errata System wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6728, > "Configuration Data Model for the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) and Packet Sampling (PSAMP) Protocols". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6728&eid=4370 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Michael Duggan > > Section: 4.8 > > Original Text > ------------- > isFlowKey: If this state parameter is present, this is a Flow Key > field. > This parameter is only available for non-Options Templates (i.e., > if setId is 2). > > isFlowKey: If this state parameter is present, this is a scope > field. > This parameter is only available for Options Templates (i.e., if > setId is 3). > > Corrected Text > -------------- > isFlowKey: If this state parameter is present, this is a Flow Key > field. > This parameter is only available for non-Options Templates (i.e., > if setId is 2). > > isScope: If this state parameter is present, this is a scope > field. > This parameter is only available for Options Templates (i.e., if > setId is 3). > > Notes > ----- > > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC6728 (draft-ietf-ipfix-configuration-model-11) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Configuration Data Model for the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) and Packet Sampling (PSAMP) Protocols > Publication Date : October 2012 > Author(s) : G. Muenz, B. Claise, P. Aitken > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : IP Flow Information Export > Area : Operations and Management > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > > _______________________________________________ > IPFIX mailing list > IPFIX@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix From nobody Thu May 21 09:30:11 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 401A11A8764; Thu, 21 May 2015 09:30:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.912 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5isf1-tCTZnE; Thu, 21 May 2015 09:30:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BCA81A88B8; Thu, 21 May 2015 09:30:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 37EB918046A; Thu, 21 May 2015 09:28:18 -0700 (PDT) To: mwd@cert.org, muenz@net.in.tum.de, bclaise@cisco.com, paitken@cisco.com X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php From: RFC Errata System Message-Id: <20150521162818.37EB918046A@rfc-editor.org> Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 09:28:18 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Cc: iesg@ietf.org, ipfix@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [IPFIX] [Errata Verified] RFC6728 (4370) X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 16:30:10 -0000 The following errata report has been verified for RFC6728, "Configuration Data Model for the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) and Packet Sampling (PSAMP) Protocols". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6728&eid=4370 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Editorial Reported by: Michael Duggan Date Reported: 2015-05-21 Verified by: Benoit Claise (IESG) Section: 4.8 Original Text ------------- isFlowKey: If this state parameter is present, this is a Flow Key field. This parameter is only available for non-Options Templates (i.e., if setId is 2). isFlowKey: If this state parameter is present, this is a scope field. This parameter is only available for Options Templates (i.e., if setId is 3). Corrected Text -------------- isFlowKey: If this state parameter is present, this is a Flow Key field. This parameter is only available for non-Options Templates (i.e., if setId is 2). isScope: If this state parameter is present, this is a scope field. This parameter is only available for Options Templates (i.e., if setId is 3). Notes ----- -------------------------------------- RFC6728 (draft-ietf-ipfix-configuration-model-11) -------------------------------------- Title : Configuration Data Model for the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) and Packet Sampling (PSAMP) Protocols Publication Date : October 2012 Author(s) : G. Muenz, B. Claise, P. Aitken Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : IP Flow Information Export Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From nobody Thu May 21 09:44:07 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687ED1A8945 for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 09:44:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cUmj6h6e7Gkw for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 09:43:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34D151A1B81 for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 09:43:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2872; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1432226637; x=1433436237; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2YaeKEnp5eby6wQQrflTSi2/ZwDoYCI9DEw6lYlJXiw=; b=iWpu+Mu/qEiXiEts4DNIWhey0stKtklwC2AfFkVgTKmhTsU4BIb8QNAo I9VGJ9yfSSp08gOEI1CXfwc0NFJmrdwkIc7avpCLoKI2avg4zyY5q7YIt 1nmQu9AB9D2NxJgDEGIXO01vGO/8GJClyb6i8BsLk1gxg8bQP1QMORBRQ c=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,470,1427760000"; d="scan'208";a="507716061" Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 May 2015 16:43:56 +0000 Received: from [64.103.106.136] (dhcp-bdlk10-data-vlan300-64-103-106-136.cisco.com [64.103.106.136]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t4LGhtaL028266; Thu, 21 May 2015 16:43:55 GMT Message-ID: <555E0B50.4000000@cisco.com> Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 17:44:00 +0100 From: Stewart Bryant User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Aitken , RFC Errata System , "muenz@net.in.tum.de" , "bclaise@cisco.com" , "paitken@cisco.com" , "joelja@bogus.com" , "n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz" , "quittek@neclab.eu" References: <20150521161640.89DF3180452@rfc-editor.org> <555E069E.50707@brocade.com> In-Reply-To: <555E069E.50707@brocade.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Cc: "ipfix@ietf.org" , "mwd@cert.org" Subject: Re: [IPFIX] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6728 (4370) X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 16:44:01 -0000 Surely it is technical rather than editorial. Stewart On 21/05/2015 17:23, Paul Aitken wrote: > Good catch, Michael! > > P. > > > On 21/05/15 17:16, RFC Errata System wrote: >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6728, >> "Configuration Data Model for the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) >> and Packet Sampling (PSAMP) Protocols". >> >> -------------------------------------- >> You may review the report below and at: >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6728&eid=4370 >> >> -------------------------------------- >> Type: Editorial >> Reported by: Michael Duggan >> >> Section: 4.8 >> >> Original Text >> ------------- >> isFlowKey: If this state parameter is present, this is a Flow Key >> field. >> This parameter is only available for non-Options Templates (i.e., >> if setId is 2). >> >> isFlowKey: If this state parameter is present, this is a scope >> field. >> This parameter is only available for Options Templates (i.e., if >> setId is 3). >> >> Corrected Text >> -------------- >> isFlowKey: If this state parameter is present, this is a Flow Key >> field. >> This parameter is only available for non-Options Templates (i.e., >> if setId is 2). >> >> isScope: If this state parameter is present, this is a scope >> field. >> This parameter is only available for Options Templates (i.e., if >> setId is 3). >> >> Notes >> ----- >> >> >> Instructions: >> ------------- >> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please >> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or >> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) >> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. >> >> -------------------------------------- >> RFC6728 (draft-ietf-ipfix-configuration-model-11) >> -------------------------------------- >> Title : Configuration Data Model for the IP Flow >> Information Export (IPFIX) and Packet Sampling (PSAMP) Protocols >> Publication Date : October 2012 >> Author(s) : G. Muenz, B. Claise, P. Aitken >> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD >> Source : IP Flow Information Export >> Area : Operations and Management >> Stream : IETF >> Verifying Party : IESG >> >> _______________________________________________ >> IPFIX mailing list >> IPFIX@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix > > _______________________________________________ > IPFIX mailing list > IPFIX@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix > . > -- For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html From nobody Thu May 21 09:49:25 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44DEA1A92B8 for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 09:49:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.267 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.267 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cXVQR8K_Dm0R for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 09:49:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx0b-000f0801.pphosted.com (mx0b-000f0801.pphosted.com [67.231.152.113]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A23801A8F50 for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 09:49:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0048192.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-000f0801.pphosted.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with SMTP id t4LFpbXv004873; Thu, 21 May 2015 09:49:12 -0700 Received: from hq1wp-exchub01.corp.brocade.com ([144.49.131.13]) by mx0b-000f0801.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 1ugvnyjpgb-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 21 May 2015 09:49:12 -0700 Received: from HQ1WP-EXMB12.corp.brocade.com (10.70.20.186) by HQ1WP-EXCHUB01.corp.brocade.com (10.70.36.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.123.3; Thu, 21 May 2015 09:48:49 -0700 Received: from [172.29.21.24] (172.29.21.24) by HQ1WP-EXMB12.corp.brocade.com (10.70.20.186) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1044.25; Thu, 21 May 2015 09:48:45 -0700 Message-ID: <555E0C6B.4070506@brocade.com> Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 17:48:43 +0100 From: Paul Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "stbryant@cisco.com" , RFC Errata System , "muenz@net.in.tum.de" , "bclaise@cisco.com" , "paitken@cisco.com" , "joelja@bogus.com" , "n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz" , "quittek@neclab.eu" References: <20150521161640.89DF3180452@rfc-editor.org> <555E069E.50707@brocade.com> <555E0B50.4000000@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <555E0B50.4000000@cisco.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [172.29.21.24] X-ClientProxiedBy: hq1wp-excas12.corp.brocade.com (10.70.38.22) To HQ1WP-EXMB12.corp.brocade.com (10.70.20.186) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.14.151, 1.0.33, 0.0.0000 definitions=2015-05-21_05:2015-05-21,2015-05-21,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1402240000 definitions=main-1505210213 Archived-At: Cc: "ipfix@ietf.org" , "mwd@cert.org" Subject: Re: [IPFIX] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6728 (4370) X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 16:49:23 -0000 cut-n-paste typo; editorial. The meaning is clear from the immediately preceding diagram (Figure 29). P. On 21/05/15 17:44, Stewart Bryant wrote: > Surely it is technical rather than editorial. > > Stewart > > On 21/05/2015 17:23, Paul Aitken wrote: >> Good catch, Michael! >> >> P. >> >> >> On 21/05/15 17:16, RFC Errata System wrote: >>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6728, >>> "Configuration Data Model for the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) >>> and Packet Sampling (PSAMP) Protocols". >>> >>> -------------------------------------- >>> You may review the report below and at: >>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6728&eid=4370 >>> >>> -------------------------------------- >>> Type: Editorial >>> Reported by: Michael Duggan >>> >>> Section: 4.8 >>> >>> Original Text >>> ------------- >>> isFlowKey: If this state parameter is present, this is a Flow Key >>> field. >>> This parameter is only available for non-Options Templates (i.e., >>> if setId is 2). >>> >>> isFlowKey: If this state parameter is present, this is a scope >>> field. >>> This parameter is only available for Options Templates (i.e., if >>> setId is 3). >>> >>> Corrected Text >>> -------------- >>> isFlowKey: If this state parameter is present, this is a Flow Key >>> field. >>> This parameter is only available for non-Options Templates (i.e., >>> if setId is 2). >>> >>> isScope: If this state parameter is present, this is a scope >>> field. >>> This parameter is only available for Options Templates (i.e., if >>> setId is 3). >>> >>> Notes >>> ----- >>> >>> >>> Instructions: >>> ------------- >>> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please >>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or >>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) >>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. >>> >>> -------------------------------------- >>> RFC6728 (draft-ietf-ipfix-configuration-model-11) >>> -------------------------------------- >>> Title : Configuration Data Model for the IP Flow >>> Information Export (IPFIX) and Packet Sampling (PSAMP) Protocols >>> Publication Date : October 2012 >>> Author(s) : G. Muenz, B. Claise, P. Aitken >>> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD >>> Source : IP Flow Information Export >>> Area : Operations and Management >>> Stream : IETF >>> Verifying Party : IESG >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> IPFIX mailing list >>> IPFIX@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix >> _______________________________________________ >> IPFIX mailing list >> IPFIX@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix >> . >> > From nobody Thu May 21 10:45:48 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57B821A00C0 for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 10:45:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sxi3L-2VcR2r for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 10:45:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 308731A007C for ; Thu, 21 May 2015 10:45:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3376; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1432230344; x=1433439944; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Hy/yh7Xuz6uPrGDQEUcushLXkDcS7Mnup+lJ+guOMAY=; b=AfNr3z11saDuiSATS69WvE4hzrFo3y08syFLM4XWYNaVUmlHPIjNHbsT pl39atpXCTZQy27zbWIvZfyLktZFjMDdRK+H1p8pzxR90i/wb9xtcIqMl X1q50JdV+pqXfCBwtrXcw7QqCARjiT7q/VJr7XDIbhiQwnm6yWU6J4Jyi Q=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,470,1427760000"; d="scan'208";a="485047319" Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 May 2015 17:45:41 +0000 Received: from [10.60.67.85] (ams-bclaise-8914.cisco.com [10.60.67.85]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t4LHjeoB025991; Thu, 21 May 2015 17:45:41 GMT Message-ID: <555E19C4.4010704@cisco.com> Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 19:45:40 +0200 From: Benoit Claise User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Aitken , "stbryant@cisco.com" , RFC Errata System , "muenz@net.in.tum.de" , "paitken@cisco.com" , "joelja@bogus.com" , "n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz" , "quittek@neclab.eu" References: <20150521161640.89DF3180452@rfc-editor.org> <555E069E.50707@brocade.com> <555E0B50.4000000@cisco.com> <555E0C6B.4070506@brocade.com> In-Reply-To: <555E0C6B.4070506@brocade.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Cc: "ipfix@ietf.org" , "mwd@cert.org" Subject: Re: [IPFIX] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6728 (4370) X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 17:45:46 -0000 On 21/05/2015 18:48, Paul Aitken wrote: > cut-n-paste typo; editorial. > > The meaning is clear from the immediately preceding diagram (Figure 29). That was my rational in accepting this as editorial. And I checked http://www.rfc-editor.org/status_type_desc.html Granted, this one is on the boundary. Regards, Benoit > > P. > > > On 21/05/15 17:44, Stewart Bryant wrote: >> Surely it is technical rather than editorial. >> >> Stewart >> >> On 21/05/2015 17:23, Paul Aitken wrote: >>> Good catch, Michael! >>> >>> P. >>> >>> >>> On 21/05/15 17:16, RFC Errata System wrote: >>>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6728, >>>> "Configuration Data Model for the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) >>>> and Packet Sampling (PSAMP) Protocols". >>>> >>>> -------------------------------------- >>>> You may review the report below and at: >>>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6728&eid=4370 >>>> >>>> -------------------------------------- >>>> Type: Editorial >>>> Reported by: Michael Duggan >>>> >>>> Section: 4.8 >>>> >>>> Original Text >>>> ------------- >>>> isFlowKey: If this state parameter is present, this is a Flow >>>> Key >>>> field. >>>> This parameter is only available for non-Options Templates >>>> (i.e., >>>> if setId is 2). >>>> >>>> isFlowKey: If this state parameter is present, this is a scope >>>> field. >>>> This parameter is only available for Options Templates >>>> (i.e., if >>>> setId is 3). >>>> >>>> Corrected Text >>>> -------------- >>>> isFlowKey: If this state parameter is present, this is a Flow >>>> Key >>>> field. >>>> This parameter is only available for non-Options Templates >>>> (i.e., >>>> if setId is 2). >>>> >>>> isScope: If this state parameter is present, this is a scope >>>> field. >>>> This parameter is only available for Options Templates >>>> (i.e., if >>>> setId is 3). >>>> >>>> Notes >>>> ----- >>>> >>>> >>>> Instructions: >>>> ------------- >>>> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please >>>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or >>>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) >>>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. >>>> >>>> -------------------------------------- >>>> RFC6728 (draft-ietf-ipfix-configuration-model-11) >>>> -------------------------------------- >>>> Title : Configuration Data Model for the IP Flow >>>> Information Export (IPFIX) and Packet Sampling (PSAMP) Protocols >>>> Publication Date : October 2012 >>>> Author(s) : G. Muenz, B. Claise, P. Aitken >>>> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD >>>> Source : IP Flow Information Export >>>> Area : Operations and Management >>>> Stream : IETF >>>> Verifying Party : IESG >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> IPFIX mailing list >>>> IPFIX@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix >>> _______________________________________________ >>> IPFIX mailing list >>> IPFIX@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix >>> . >>> >> > > . > From nobody Fri May 22 11:55:32 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59B941A00BE for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 11:55:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.85 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.85 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CbFXbSbTcYgh for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 11:55:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-out1.informatik.tu-muenchen.de (mail-out1.informatik.tu-muenchen.de [131.159.0.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 735621A000E for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 11:55:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.26] (x5ce59976.dyn.telefonica.de [92.229.153.118]) by mail.net.in.tum.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E0268188DCBF; Fri, 22 May 2015 20:55:21 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <555F7B9E.6080901@net.in.tum.de> Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 20:55:26 +0200 From: Gerhard Muenz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Benoit Claise , Paul Aitken , "stbryant@cisco.com" , RFC Errata System , "paitken@cisco.com" , "joelja@bogus.com" , "n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz" , "quittek@neclab.eu" References: <20150521161640.89DF3180452@rfc-editor.org> <555E069E.50707@brocade.com> <555E0B50.4000000@cisco.com> <555E0C6B.4070506@brocade.com> <555E19C4.4010704@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <555E19C4.4010704@cisco.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Cc: "ipfix@ietf.org" , "mwd@cert.org" Subject: Re: [IPFIX] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6728 (4370) X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 18:55:30 -0000 Hi, Thanks for reporting this error. Luckily, it does not repeat in the yang module specification nor in any example or diagram. So, I do not think that this error has mislead any reader of the RFC. "Editorial" seems right for me. Regards, Gerhard On 21.05.2015 19:45, Benoit Claise wrote: > On 21/05/2015 18:48, Paul Aitken wrote: >> cut-n-paste typo; editorial. >> >> The meaning is clear from the immediately preceding diagram (Figure 29). > That was my rational in accepting this as editorial. > And I checked http://www.rfc-editor.org/status_type_desc.html > Granted, this one is on the boundary. > > Regards, Benoit >> >> P. >> >> >> On 21/05/15 17:44, Stewart Bryant wrote: >>> Surely it is technical rather than editorial. >>> >>> Stewart >>> >>> On 21/05/2015 17:23, Paul Aitken wrote: >>>> Good catch, Michael! >>>> >>>> P. >>>> >>>> >>>> On 21/05/15 17:16, RFC Errata System wrote: >>>>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6728, >>>>> "Configuration Data Model for the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) >>>>> and Packet Sampling (PSAMP) Protocols". >>>>> >>>>> -------------------------------------- >>>>> You may review the report below and at: >>>>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6728&eid=4370 >>>>> >>>>> -------------------------------------- >>>>> Type: Editorial >>>>> Reported by: Michael Duggan >>>>> >>>>> Section: 4.8 >>>>> >>>>> Original Text >>>>> ------------- >>>>> isFlowKey: If this state parameter is present, this is a >>>>> Flow Key >>>>> field. >>>>> This parameter is only available for non-Options Templates >>>>> (i.e., >>>>> if setId is 2). >>>>> >>>>> isFlowKey: If this state parameter is present, this is a scope >>>>> field. >>>>> This parameter is only available for Options Templates >>>>> (i.e., if >>>>> setId is 3). >>>>> >>>>> Corrected Text >>>>> -------------- >>>>> isFlowKey: If this state parameter is present, this is a >>>>> Flow Key >>>>> field. >>>>> This parameter is only available for non-Options Templates >>>>> (i.e., >>>>> if setId is 2). >>>>> >>>>> isScope: If this state parameter is present, this is a scope >>>>> field. >>>>> This parameter is only available for Options Templates >>>>> (i.e., if >>>>> setId is 3). >>>>> >>>>> Notes >>>>> ----- >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Instructions: >>>>> ------------- >>>>> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please >>>>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or >>>>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) >>>>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. >>>>> >>>>> -------------------------------------- >>>>> RFC6728 (draft-ietf-ipfix-configuration-model-11) >>>>> -------------------------------------- >>>>> Title : Configuration Data Model for the IP Flow >>>>> Information Export (IPFIX) and Packet Sampling (PSAMP) Protocols >>>>> Publication Date : October 2012 >>>>> Author(s) : G. Muenz, B. Claise, P. Aitken >>>>> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD >>>>> Source : IP Flow Information Export >>>>> Area : Operations and Management >>>>> Stream : IETF >>>>> Verifying Party : IESG >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> IPFIX mailing list >>>>> IPFIX@ietf.org >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> IPFIX mailing list >>>> IPFIX@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix >>>> . >>>> >>> >> >> . >> >