From nobody Sun Feb 12 19:48:56 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1DFA129513; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 19:48:55 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.221 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ARRKfb8ClTSX; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 19:48:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5331D1293F0; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 19:48:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml708-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DGJ13073; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 03:48:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from NKGEML412-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.73) by lhreml708-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 03:48:49 +0000 Received: from NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::a54a:89d2:c471:ff]) by nkgeml412-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.73]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 11:48:44 +0800 From: Tianran Zhou To: "IPFIX@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02 Thread-Index: AdKFqjl1xBXNvf7XRCiwopLruYITLAAAEJpw Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 03:49:47 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.156.116] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020203.58A12CA3.01A3, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 33fb402d6dc0fc4450fa91eef5291391 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community.authors@ietf.org" Subject: [IPFIX] FW: WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02 X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 03:48:55 -0000 Dear IPFIX, Since the IPFIX WG is concluded, this IE extension draft is processed now i= n OPSAWG. Thanks very much for the previous comments and discussions on this draft in= this mailing list. Now the OPSAWG is polling for adoption of this I-D. I sincerely appreciate = your opinion and review. Best Regards, Tianran Zhou -----Original Message----- From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 11:37 AM To: opsawg@ietf.org Cc: opsawg-chairs@ietf.org Subject: [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-= 02 Dear OPSAWG, In Seoul, we got enough interest and positive response on this IPFIX IE ext= ension draft. By the authors' request, this email starts a formal poll. The chairs would = like to know if the WG participants agree that the following document shoul= d be adopted as a WG document in OPSAWG. Export BGP community information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02 The adoption poll will take two weeks. Please let us know your opinion by F= eb 27. It would also be good to hear who is willing to review and/or implem= ent or deploy the extension described in the document. Since we already found that the majority of the f2f participants at our IET= F97 session like this idea, please do speak up now if you do not agree or h= ave serious objections (with explanation of course). Regards, Tianran _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg From nobody Sun Feb 12 21:16:07 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C50A512947C; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 21:16:05 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.018 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.018 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=outlook.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CplEzs8iuJTl; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 21:16:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from SNT004-OMC4S13.hotmail.com (snt004-omc4s13.hotmail.com [65.55.90.216]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A25891204D9; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 21:15:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from APC01-PU1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([65.55.90.201]) by SNT004-OMC4S13.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Sun, 12 Feb 2017 21:15:57 -0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=LSxQV+i+VJhXoi43kQeNMVQ6033UQ7R536aWM9+72D8=; b=s71xQ3HUvTabTk/k4Zxhyc8kNEdU2T3hTWUz3By9hpYZO5QRByns212hE3VPFZt58AKCY84I+NcqyDVIEkLz2gMglP/Y2/qSYPwIQis/InqqkViiOXQVGqNcIKX+c5+vLlHp9/Arcq93reLTxBIcOPbL6kGHBBmaWity57Dovm5Vdz5SqKMnCbYID2syBsO/vSpcGSkqj+zGY6RVB6gn7slKYyBlj/weiVSbUzpysmqmOrZiMhwRnnF3MhCNzYANTJ7RGG5E9mTFz7q4/GxS6mY8OaP0XM/a1b4FBHUkYwbVXWDilMWAMlDllcE6X3Iq5MpHy1skGeA00LO54v93HQ== Received: from HK2APC01FT007.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.248.52) by HK2APC01HT168.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.249.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.874.2; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 05:15:54 +0000 Received: from HKNPR02MB1843.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.152.248.54) by HK2APC01FT007.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.248.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.874.2 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 05:15:54 +0000 Received: from HKNPR02MB1843.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::55cc:8e34:53c7:e065]) by HKNPR02MB1843.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::55cc:8e34:53c7:e065%14]) with mapi id 15.01.0888.030; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 05:15:54 +0000 From: =?gb2312?B?ucsgyNY=?= To: Tianran Zhou , "IPFIX@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02 Thread-Index: AdKFqjl1xBXNvf7XRCiwopLruYITLAAAEJpwAANatM4= Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 05:15:54 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=outlook.com; x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:6F6457D120566377CC1BBB099ECF8E8A85F566D6AF703A9B7C3D8B721DDC827B; UpperCasedChecksum:CA54324D6455C5831EDE89B05FFC36E03881442AFD492DC513E1D3F63250DAB7; SizeAsReceived:8036; Count:39 x-tmn: [8Pglmbr3zmy94/Rgk4fus0K0DA1IfHrBkvZtXywsu/M=] x-incomingheadercount: 39 x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; HK2APC01HT168; 5:a1P79EytujiS8H5A8AgKmYeWDjG52mFjm2rfb8SfpoX6obVTiu3aQCIVv1EzclbFhD0vXTDcF5zL8KBcnVjmUsMwtEjZh6LTYHzEGqty57ysA/9MvTfqU5s0myfwbvy9k4yghA4CoUFYcRpkOR8H3g==; 24:m58H+acVcUWUoNJ2cXMnKuUDWcAdb7CR4ZcI356RUIF5iXgcNOG6zm+mJ/5aY3DRj+n8lu1jAuY9NXrLNPXvokkbsno04i7+7XfaBw/IKQM=; 7: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 x-forefront-antispam-report: EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(98900007); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:HK2APC01HT168; H:HKNPR02MB1843.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: a16193f5-ca3f-4c3a-f1dc-08d453cf62b2 x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(5061506426)(5061507331)(1603103135)(1601125107)(1603101373)(1701031045); SRVR:HK2APC01HT168; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(432015086)(82015046); SRVR:HK2APC01HT168; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:HK2APC01HT168; x-forefront-prvs: 02176E2458 spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_HKNPR02MB1843C24EA99FEEE8D95015AF8B590HKNPR02MB1843apcp_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 Feb 2017 05:15:54.2870 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HK2APC01HT168 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Feb 2017 05:15:57.0019 (UTC) FILETIME=[41B78AB0:01D285B8] Archived-At: Cc: "draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community.authors@ietf.org" Subject: [IPFIX] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogV0cgYWRvcHRpb24gcG9sbCBmb3IgZHJhZnQt?= =?gb2312?b?bGktb3BzYXdnLWlwZml4LWJncC1jb21tdW5pdHktMDI=?= X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 05:16:06 -0000 --_000_HKNPR02MB1843C24EA99FEEE8D95015AF8B590HKNPR02MB1843apcp_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SGksIGRlYXIgYWxsLiBBcyBhIGNvLWF1dGhvciwgSSBzdXBwb3J0IHRoZSBhZG9wdGlvbiBvZiB0 aGlzIGRyYWZ0IGFzIGEgd29yayBncm91cCBkb2N1bWVudC4gSGVyZSB0aHJlZSBpbmZvcm1hdGlv biBlbGVtZW50cyBpbmNsdWRpbmcgYmdwQ29tbXVuaXR5LCBiZ3BTb3VyY2VDb21tdW5pdHlMaXN0 IGFuZCBiZ3BEZXN0aW5hdGlvbkNvbW11bml0eUxpc3QgYXJlIGludHJvZHVjZWQgaW4gb3JkZXIg dG8gY2FycnkgQkdQIGNvbW11bml0eSBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbi4gV2UgZG8gdGhpbmsgaXQncyBhIG5l Y2Vzc2FyeSBhbmQgdXNlZnVsIGV4dGVuc2lvbi4NCg0KDQpCZXN0IHJlZ2FyZHMuDQpHdSBSb25n DQpndXJvbmdfY21jY0BvdXRsb29rLmNvbQ0KZ3Vyb25nQGNoaW5hbW9iaWxlLmNvbQ0KX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCreivP7IyzogVGlhbnJhbiBaaG91IDx6aG91dGlh bnJhbkBodWF3ZWkuY29tPg0Kt6LLzcqxvOQ6IDIwMTfE6jLUwjEzyNUgMzo0OQ0KytW8/sjLOiBJ UEZJWEBpZXRmLm9yZw0Ks63LzTogZHJhZnQtbGktb3BzYXdnLWlwZml4LWJncC1jb21tdW5pdHku YXV0aG9yc0BpZXRmLm9yZw0K1vfM4jogRlc6IFdHIGFkb3B0aW9uIHBvbGwgZm9yIGRyYWZ0LWxp LW9wc2F3Zy1pcGZpeC1iZ3AtY29tbXVuaXR5LTAyDQoNCkRlYXIgSVBGSVgsDQoNClNpbmNlIHRo ZSBJUEZJWCBXRyBpcyBjb25jbHVkZWQsIHRoaXMgSUUgZXh0ZW5zaW9uIGRyYWZ0IGlzIHByb2Nl c3NlZCBub3cgaW4gT1BTQVdHLg0KVGhhbmtzIHZlcnkgbXVjaCBmb3IgdGhlIHByZXZpb3VzIGNv bW1lbnRzIGFuZCBkaXNjdXNzaW9ucyBvbiB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0IGluIHRoaXMgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0 Lg0KTm93IHRoZSBPUFNBV0cgaXMgcG9sbGluZyBmb3IgYWRvcHRpb24gb2YgdGhpcyBJLUQuIEkg c2luY2VyZWx5IGFwcHJlY2lhdGUgeW91ciBvcGluaW9uIGFuZCByZXZpZXcuDQoNCkJlc3QgUmVn YXJkcywNClRpYW5yYW4gWmhvdQ0KDQotLS0tLU9yaWdpbmFsIE1lc3NhZ2UtLS0tLQ0KRnJvbTog T1BTQVdHIFttYWlsdG86b3BzYXdnLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmddIE9uIEJlaGFsZiBPZiBUaWFu cmFuIFpob3UNClNlbnQ6IE1vbmRheSwgRmVicnVhcnkgMTMsIDIwMTcgMTE6MzcgQU0NClRvOiBv cHNhd2dAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCkNjOiBvcHNhd2ctY2hhaXJzQGlldGYub3JnDQpTdWJqZWN0OiBbT1BT QVdHXSBXRyBhZG9wdGlvbiBwb2xsIGZvciBkcmFmdC1saS1vcHNhd2ctaXBmaXgtYmdwLWNvbW11 bml0eS0wMg0KDQpEZWFyIE9QU0FXRywNCg0KSW4gU2VvdWwsIHdlIGdvdCBlbm91Z2ggaW50ZXJl c3QgYW5kIHBvc2l0aXZlIHJlc3BvbnNlIG9uIHRoaXMgSVBGSVggSUUgZXh0ZW5zaW9uIGRyYWZ0 Lg0KQnkgdGhlIGF1dGhvcnMnIHJlcXVlc3QsIHRoaXMgZW1haWwgc3RhcnRzIGEgZm9ybWFsIHBv bGwuIFRoZSBjaGFpcnMgd291bGQgbGlrZSB0byBrbm93IGlmIHRoZSBXRyBwYXJ0aWNpcGFudHMg YWdyZWUgdGhhdCB0aGUgZm9sbG93aW5nIGRvY3VtZW50IHNob3VsZCBiZSBhZG9wdGVkIGFzIGEg V0cgZG9jdW1lbnQgaW4gT1BTQVdHLg0KDQpFeHBvcnQgQkdQIGNvbW11bml0eSBpbmZvcm1hdGlv biBpbiBJUCBGbG93IEluZm9ybWF0aW9uIEV4cG9ydCAoSVBGSVgpDQpodHRwczovL3Rvb2xzLmll dGYub3JnL2h0bWwvZHJhZnQtbGktb3BzYXdnLWlwZml4LWJncC1jb21tdW5pdHktMDINCg0KVGhl IGFkb3B0aW9uIHBvbGwgd2lsbCB0YWtlIHR3byB3ZWVrcy4gUGxlYXNlIGxldCB1cyBrbm93IHlv dXIgb3BpbmlvbiBieSBGZWIgMjcuIEl0IHdvdWxkIGFsc28gYmUgZ29vZCB0byBoZWFyIHdobyBp cyB3aWxsaW5nIHRvIHJldmlldyBhbmQvb3IgaW1wbGVtZW50IG9yIGRlcGxveSB0aGUgZXh0ZW5z aW9uIGRlc2NyaWJlZCBpbiB0aGUgZG9jdW1lbnQuDQoNClNpbmNlIHdlIGFscmVhZHkgZm91bmQg dGhhdCB0aGUgbWFqb3JpdHkgb2YgdGhlIGYyZiBwYXJ0aWNpcGFudHMgYXQgb3VyIElFVEY5NyBz ZXNzaW9uIGxpa2UgdGhpcyBpZGVhLCBwbGVhc2UgZG8gc3BlYWsgdXAgbm93IGlmIHlvdSBkbyBu b3QgYWdyZWUgb3IgaGF2ZSBzZXJpb3VzIG9iamVjdGlvbnMgKHdpdGggZXhwbGFuYXRpb24gb2Yg Y291cnNlKS4NCg0KUmVnYXJkcywNClRpYW5yYW4NCg0KX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCk9QU0FXRyBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QNCk9QU0FXR0BpZXRm Lm9yZw0KaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9vcHNhd2cNCg== --_000_HKNPR02MB1843C24EA99FEEE8D95015AF8B590HKNPR02MB1843apcp_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi, dear all. As a co-author, I = support the adoption of this draft as a work group document. Here three information elements including bgpCommunity, bgpSourceCommunityList and bgpDestinationCommunityList are i= ntroduced in order to carry BGP community information. We do think it'= s a necessary and useful extension.


Best regards.
Gu Rong
gurong_cmcc@outlook.com
gurong@chinamobile.com
=B7=A2=BC=FE=C8=CB: Tianr= an Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
=B7=A2=CB=CD=CA=B1=BC=E4: 2017=C4=EA2=D4=C213=C8=D5 3:49
=CA=D5=BC=FE=C8=CB: IPFIX@ietf.org
=B3=AD=CB=CD: draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community.authors@ietf.org =D6=F7=CC=E2: FW: WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-com= munity-02
 
Dear IPFIX,

Since the IPFIX WG is concluded, this IE extension draft is processed now i= n OPSAWG.
Thanks very much for the previous comments and discussions on this draft in= this mailing list.
Now the OPSAWG is polling for adoption of this I-D. I sincerely appreciate = your opinion and review.

Best Regards,
Tianran Zhou

-----Original Message-----
From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun= ces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 11:37 AM
To: opsawg@ietf.org
Cc: opsawg-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-= 02

Dear OPSAWG,

In Seoul, we got enough interest and positive response on this IPFIX IE ext= ension draft.
By the authors' request, this email starts a formal poll. The chairs would = like to know if the WG participants agree that the following document shoul= d be adopted as a WG document in OPSAWG.

Export BGP community information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02<= br>
The adoption poll will take two weeks. Please let us know your opinion by F= eb 27. It would also be good to hear who is willing to review and/or implem= ent or deploy the extension described in the document.

Since we already found that the majority of the f2f participants at our IET= F97 session like this idea, please do speak up now if you do not agree or h= ave serious objections (with explanation of course).

Regards,
Tianran

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.o= rg/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
--_000_HKNPR02MB1843C24EA99FEEE8D95015AF8B590HKNPR02MB1843apcp_-- From nobody Mon Feb 13 04:40:10 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E491112963E; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 04:40:08 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7cDeY5OWn7ej; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 04:40:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx0a-000f0801.pphosted.com (mx0a-000f0801.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:7a::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3F49129621; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 04:40:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0000542.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-000f0801.pphosted.com (8.16.0.20/8.16.0.20) with SMTP id v1DCYdcT023331; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 04:39:56 -0800 Received: from brmwp-exmb12.corp.brocade.com ([208.47.132.227]) by mx0a-000f0801.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 28j2w25tbc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 13 Feb 2017 04:39:56 -0800 Received: from EMEAWP-EXMB11.corp.brocade.com (172.29.11.85) by BRMWP-EXMB12.corp.brocade.com (172.16.59.130) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 05:39:51 -0700 Received: from [172.27.212.154] (172.27.212.154) by EMEAWP-EXMB11.corp.brocade.com (172.29.11.85) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 13:39:48 +0100 To: Tianran Zhou , "IPFIX@ietf.org" References: From: PJ Aitken Message-ID: Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 12:39:44 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [172.27.212.154] X-ClientProxiedBy: hq1wp-excas14.corp.brocade.com (10.70.38.103) To EMEAWP-EXMB11.corp.brocade.com (172.29.11.85) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-02-13_07:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1612050000 definitions=main-1702130124 Archived-At: Cc: "draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community.authors@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [IPFIX] FW: WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02 X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 12:40:09 -0000 Per section 6 of RFC7012, new IPFIX Information Elements can be added by direct application to IANA; there's no need for a draft or RFC. However, the introduction and examples may be valuable, especially for BGP experts who are less familiar with IPFIX. I've no objection to adopting the draft. P. On 13/02/17 03:49, Tianran Zhou wrote: > Dear IPFIX, > > Since the IPFIX WG is concluded, this IE extension draft is processed now in OPSAWG. > Thanks very much for the previous comments and discussions on this draft in this mailing list. > Now the OPSAWG is polling for adoption of this I-D. I sincerely appreciate your opinion and review. > > Best Regards, > Tianran Zhou > > -----Original Message----- > From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou > Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 11:37 AM > To: opsawg@ietf.org > Cc: opsawg-chairs@ietf.org > Subject: [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02 > > Dear OPSAWG, > > In Seoul, we got enough interest and positive response on this IPFIX IE extension draft. > By the authors' request, this email starts a formal poll. The chairs would like to know if the WG participants agree that the following document should be adopted as a WG document in OPSAWG. > > Export BGP community information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Dli-2Dopsawg-2Dipfix-2Dbgp-2Dcommunity-2D02&d=DwICAg&c=IL_XqQWOjubgfqINi2jTzg&r=Xx9729xYDYoCgBDdcp1FKt5PyYd1TCoXNKhyPY8CFp8&m=e8U_gPwC_H2I5yK7XMm7IZ29PU1rg0wNbPsJvDG6RDI&s=xYsTrrFuD2dlfxdp0X3pcPMw4vuozglfpGLv4A5TKNw&e= > > The adoption poll will take two weeks. Please let us know your opinion by Feb 27. It would also be good to hear who is willing to review and/or implement or deploy the extension described in the document. > > Since we already found that the majority of the f2f participants at our IETF97 session like this idea, please do speak up now if you do not agree or have serious objections (with explanation of course). > > Regards, > Tianran > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > OPSAWG@ietf.org > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_opsawg&d=DwICAg&c=IL_XqQWOjubgfqINi2jTzg&r=Xx9729xYDYoCgBDdcp1FKt5PyYd1TCoXNKhyPY8CFp8&m=e8U_gPwC_H2I5yK7XMm7IZ29PU1rg0wNbPsJvDG6RDI&s=lUyPAeQ2BUnIuqL4qUS1w45CNe3JixjYQzYQVN4Y3q4&e= > > _______________________________________________ > IPFIX mailing list > IPFIX@ietf.org > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_ipfix&d=DwICAg&c=IL_XqQWOjubgfqINi2jTzg&r=Xx9729xYDYoCgBDdcp1FKt5PyYd1TCoXNKhyPY8CFp8&m=e8U_gPwC_H2I5yK7XMm7IZ29PU1rg0wNbPsJvDG6RDI&s=lOUrCUQVhsdnIWvSTJycjdy-0V6yZZ9NvjU2N-wZn18&e= From nobody Mon Feb 13 23:33:24 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 954E31294F7; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 23:33:20 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JWvt9PMzL7yd; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 23:33:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from cmccmta3.chinamobile.com (cmccmta3.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D7FB12947A; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 23:33:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.1]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app12-12012 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2eec58a2b2b1257-8a6c5; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 15:33:05 +0800 (CST) X-RM-TRANSID: 2eec58a2b2b1257-8a6c5 X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000 Received: from cmcc-PC (unknown[223.72.55.152]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr01-12001 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee158a2b2afdeb-59c94; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 15:33:05 +0800 (CST) X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee158a2b2afdeb-59c94 Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 15:34:38 +0800 From: "lizhenqiang@chinamobile.com" To: "PJ Aitken" , Zhoutianran , "ipfix@ietf.org" , opsawg References: , X-Priority: 3 X-Has-Attach: no X-Mailer: Foxmail 7, 2, 7, 164[cn] Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <201702141534369518773@chinamobile.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart832001274031_=----" Archived-At: Cc: "draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community.authors@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [IPFIX] FW: WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02 X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 07:33:20 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_001_NextPart832001274031_=---- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SSBzdXBwb3J0IHRoZSBhZG9wdGlvbiBvZiB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0IGFzIGEgY28tYXV0aG9yLiBUaGUg cmVxdWlyZW1lbnQgY29tZXMgZnJvbSB0aGUgZmllbGQgbmV0d29yay4NCg0KQmVzdCBSZWdhcmRz DQoNCg0KbGl6aGVucWlhbmdAY2hpbmFtb2JpbGUuY29tDQogDQpGcm9tOiBQSiBBaXRrZW4NCkRh dGU6IDIwMTctMDItMTMgMjA6MzkNClRvOiBUaWFucmFuIFpob3U7IElQRklYQGlldGYub3JnDQpD QzogZHJhZnQtbGktb3BzYXdnLWlwZml4LWJncC1jb21tdW5pdHkuYXV0aG9yc0BpZXRmLm9yZw0K U3ViamVjdDogUmU6IFtJUEZJWF0gRlc6IFdHIGFkb3B0aW9uIHBvbGwgZm9yIGRyYWZ0LWxpLW9w c2F3Zy1pcGZpeC1iZ3AtY29tbXVuaXR5LTAyDQpQZXIgc2VjdGlvbiA2IG9mIFJGQzcwMTIsIG5l dyBJUEZJWCBJbmZvcm1hdGlvbiBFbGVtZW50cyBjYW4gYmUgYWRkZWQgYnkgDQpkaXJlY3QgYXBw bGljYXRpb24gdG8gSUFOQTsgdGhlcmUncyBubyBuZWVkIGZvciBhIGRyYWZ0IG9yIFJGQy4NCiAN Ckhvd2V2ZXIsIHRoZSBpbnRyb2R1Y3Rpb24gYW5kIGV4YW1wbGVzIG1heSBiZSB2YWx1YWJsZSwg ZXNwZWNpYWxseSBmb3IgDQpCR1AgZXhwZXJ0cyB3aG8gYXJlIGxlc3MgZmFtaWxpYXIgd2l0aCBJ UEZJWC4NCiANCkkndmUgbm8gb2JqZWN0aW9uIHRvIGFkb3B0aW5nIHRoZSBkcmFmdC4NCiANClAu DQogDQogDQpPbiAxMy8wMi8xNyAwMzo0OSwgVGlhbnJhbiBaaG91IHdyb3RlOg0KPiBEZWFyIElQ RklYLA0KPg0KPiBTaW5jZSB0aGUgSVBGSVggV0cgaXMgY29uY2x1ZGVkLCB0aGlzIElFIGV4dGVu c2lvbiBkcmFmdCBpcyBwcm9jZXNzZWQgbm93IGluIE9QU0FXRy4NCj4gVGhhbmtzIHZlcnkgbXVj aCBmb3IgdGhlIHByZXZpb3VzIGNvbW1lbnRzIGFuZCBkaXNjdXNzaW9ucyBvbiB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0 IGluIHRoaXMgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0Lg0KPiBOb3cgdGhlIE9QU0FXRyBpcyBwb2xsaW5nIGZvciBh ZG9wdGlvbiBvZiB0aGlzIEktRC4gSSBzaW5jZXJlbHkgYXBwcmVjaWF0ZSB5b3VyIG9waW5pb24g YW5kIHJldmlldy4NCj4NCj4gQmVzdCBSZWdhcmRzLA0KPiBUaWFucmFuIFpob3UNCj4NCj4gLS0t LS1PcmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCj4gRnJvbTogT1BTQVdHIFttYWlsdG86b3BzYXdnLWJv dW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmddIE9uIEJlaGFsZiBPZiBUaWFucmFuIFpob3UNCj4gU2VudDogTW9uZGF5 LCBGZWJydWFyeSAxMywgMjAxNyAxMTozNyBBTQ0KPiBUbzogb3BzYXdnQGlldGYub3JnDQo+IENj OiBvcHNhd2ctY2hhaXJzQGlldGYub3JnDQo+IFN1YmplY3Q6IFtPUFNBV0ddIFdHIGFkb3B0aW9u IHBvbGwgZm9yIGRyYWZ0LWxpLW9wc2F3Zy1pcGZpeC1iZ3AtY29tbXVuaXR5LTAyDQo+DQo+IERl YXIgT1BTQVdHLA0KPg0KPiBJbiBTZW91bCwgd2UgZ290IGVub3VnaCBpbnRlcmVzdCBhbmQgcG9z aXRpdmUgcmVzcG9uc2Ugb24gdGhpcyBJUEZJWCBJRSBleHRlbnNpb24gZHJhZnQuDQo+IEJ5IHRo ZSBhdXRob3JzJyByZXF1ZXN0LCB0aGlzIGVtYWlsIHN0YXJ0cyBhIGZvcm1hbCBwb2xsLiBUaGUg Y2hhaXJzIHdvdWxkIGxpa2UgdG8ga25vdyBpZiB0aGUgV0cgcGFydGljaXBhbnRzIGFncmVlIHRo YXQgdGhlIGZvbGxvd2luZyBkb2N1bWVudCBzaG91bGQgYmUgYWRvcHRlZCBhcyBhIFdHIGRvY3Vt ZW50IGluIE9QU0FXRy4NCj4NCj4gRXhwb3J0IEJHUCBjb21tdW5pdHkgaW5mb3JtYXRpb24gaW4g SVAgRmxvdyBJbmZvcm1hdGlvbiBFeHBvcnQgKElQRklYKQ0KPiBodHRwczovL3VybGRlZmVuc2Uu cHJvb2Zwb2ludC5jb20vdjIvdXJsP3U9aHR0cHMtM0FfX3Rvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnX2h0bWxfZHJh ZnQtMkRsaS0yRG9wc2F3Zy0yRGlwZml4LTJEYmdwLTJEY29tbXVuaXR5LTJEMDImZD1Ed0lDQWcm Yz1JTF9YcVFXT2p1YmdmcUlOaTJqVHpnJnI9WHg5NzI5eFlEWW9DZ0JEZGNwMUZLdDVQeVlkMVRD b1hOS2h5UFk4Q0ZwOCZtPWU4VV9nUHdDX0gySTV5SzdYTW03SVoyOVBVMXJnMHdOYlBzSnZERzZS REkmcz14WXNUcnJGdUQyZGxmeGRwMFgzcGNQTXc0dnVvemdsZnBHTHY0QTVUS053JmU9DQo+DQo+ IFRoZSBhZG9wdGlvbiBwb2xsIHdpbGwgdGFrZSB0d28gd2Vla3MuIFBsZWFzZSBsZXQgdXMga25v dyB5b3VyIG9waW5pb24gYnkgRmViIDI3LiBJdCB3b3VsZCBhbHNvIGJlIGdvb2QgdG8gaGVhciB3 aG8gaXMgd2lsbGluZyB0byByZXZpZXcgYW5kL29yIGltcGxlbWVudCBvciBkZXBsb3kgdGhlIGV4 dGVuc2lvbiBkZXNjcmliZWQgaW4gdGhlIGRvY3VtZW50Lg0KPg0KPiBTaW5jZSB3ZSBhbHJlYWR5 IGZvdW5kIHRoYXQgdGhlIG1ham9yaXR5IG9mIHRoZSBmMmYgcGFydGljaXBhbnRzIGF0IG91ciBJ RVRGOTcgc2Vzc2lvbiBsaWtlIHRoaXMgaWRlYSwgcGxlYXNlIGRvIHNwZWFrIHVwIG5vdyBpZiB5 b3UgZG8gbm90IGFncmVlIG9yIGhhdmUgc2VyaW91cyBvYmplY3Rpb25zICh3aXRoIGV4cGxhbmF0 aW9uIG9mIGNvdXJzZSkuDQo+DQo+IFJlZ2FyZHMsDQo+IFRpYW5yYW4NCj4NCj4gX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCj4gT1BTQVdHIG1haWxpbmcg bGlzdA0KPiBPUFNBV0dAaWV0Zi5vcmcNCj4gaHR0cHM6Ly91cmxkZWZlbnNlLnByb29mcG9pbnQu Y29tL3YyL3VybD91PWh0dHBzLTNBX193d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmdfbWFpbG1hbl9saXN0aW5mb19vcHNh d2cmZD1Ed0lDQWcmYz1JTF9YcVFXT2p1YmdmcUlOaTJqVHpnJnI9WHg5NzI5eFlEWW9DZ0JEZGNw MUZLdDVQeVlkMVRDb1hOS2h5UFk4Q0ZwOCZtPWU4VV9nUHdDX0gySTV5SzdYTW03SVoyOVBVMXJn MHdOYlBzSnZERzZSREkmcz1sVXlQQWVRMkJVbkl1cUw0cVVTMXc0NUNOZTNKaXhqWVF6WVFWTjRZ M3E0JmU9DQo+DQo+IF9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fDQo+IElQRklYIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KPiBJUEZJWEBpZXRmLm9yZw0KPiBodHRwczovL3Vy bGRlZmVuc2UucHJvb2Zwb2ludC5jb20vdjIvdXJsP3U9aHR0cHMtM0FfX3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZ19t YWlsbWFuX2xpc3RpbmZvX2lwZml4JmQ9RHdJQ0FnJmM9SUxfWHFRV09qdWJnZnFJTmkyalR6ZyZy PVh4OTcyOXhZRFlvQ2dCRGRjcDFGS3Q1UHlZZDFUQ29YTktoeVBZOENGcDgmbT1lOFVfZ1B3Q19I Mkk1eUs3WE1tN0laMjlQVTFyZzB3TmJQc0p2REc2UkRJJnM9bE9VckNVUVZoc2RuSVd2U1RKeWNq ZHktMFY2eVpaOU52alUyTi13Wm4xOCZlPQ0KIA0KX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCklQRklYIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KSVBGSVhAaWV0Zi5vcmcN Cmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vaXBmaXgNCiANCiANCg== ------=_001_NextPart832001274031_=---- Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0A
I support the adoption of this draft as a co-auth= or. The requirement comes from the field network.
=0A

<= div>Best Regards
=0A
lizhenqiang@chinamobile.com
=0A
 
<= div>From: PJ Aitken
Subject: Re: [IPFIX] FW: WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-comm= unity-02
Per section 6 of RFC7012, new IPFIX In= formation Elements can be added by
=0A
direct application to IAN= A; there's no need for a draft or RFC.
=0A
 
=0A
Ho= wever, the introduction and examples may be valuable, especially for =0A
BGP experts who are less familiar with IPFIX.
=0A
 =
=0A
I've no objection to adopting the draft.
=0A
 =
=0A
P.
=0A
 
=0A
 
=0A
On 1= 3/02/17 03:49, Tianran Zhou wrote:
=0A
> Dear IPFIX,
=0A<= div>>
=0A
> Since the IPFIX WG is concluded, this IE extens= ion draft is processed now in OPSAWG.
=0A
> Thanks very much f= or the previous comments and discussions on this draft in this mailing lis= t.
=0A
> Now the OPSAWG is polling for adoption of this I-D. I= sincerely appreciate your opinion and review.
=0A
>
=0A<= div>> Best Regards,
=0A
> Tianran Zhou
=0A
>=0A
> -----Original Message-----
=0A
> From: OPSAWG = [mailto:opsawg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou
=0A
&g= t; Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 11:37 AM
=0A
> To: opsawg@i= etf.org
=0A
> Cc: opsawg-chairs@ietf.org
=0A
> Sub= ject: [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02=
=0A
>
=0A
> Dear OPSAWG,
=0A
>
= =0A
> In Seoul, we got enough interest and positive response on thi= s IPFIX IE extension draft.
=0A
> By the authors' request, thi= s email starts a formal poll. The chairs would like to know if the WG part= icipants agree that the following document should be adopted as a WG docum= ent in OPSAWG.
=0A
>
=0A
> Export BGP community in= formation in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)
=0A
> https://= urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=3Dhttps-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2= Dli-2Dopsawg-2Dipfix-2Dbgp-2Dcommunity-2D02&d=3DDwICAg&c=3DIL_XqQW= OjubgfqINi2jTzg&r=3DXx9729xYDYoCgBDdcp1FKt5PyYd1TCoXNKhyPY8CFp8&m= =3De8U_gPwC_H2I5yK7XMm7IZ29PU1rg0wNbPsJvDG6RDI&s=3DxYsTrrFuD2dlfxdp0X3= pcPMw4vuozglfpGLv4A5TKNw&e=3D
=0A
>
=0A
> The = adoption poll will take two weeks. Please let us know your opinion by Feb = 27. It would also be good to hear who is willing to review and/or implemen= t or deploy the extension described in the document.
=0A
>=0A
> Since we already found that the majority of the f2f partici= pants at our IETF97 session like this idea, please do speak up now if you = do not agree or have serious objections (with explanation of course).=0A
>
=0A
> Regards,
=0A
> Tianran
= =0A
>
=0A
> ___________________________________________= ____
=0A
> OPSAWG mailing list
=0A
> OPSAWG@ietf.o= rg
=0A
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=3Dhttps-3A= __www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_opsawg&d=3DDwICAg&c=3DIL_XqQWOjubg= fqINi2jTzg&r=3DXx9729xYDYoCgBDdcp1FKt5PyYd1TCoXNKhyPY8CFp8&m=3De8U= _gPwC_H2I5yK7XMm7IZ29PU1rg0wNbPsJvDG6RDI&s=3DlUyPAeQ2BUnIuqL4qUS1w45CN= e3JixjYQzYQVN4Y3q4&e=3D
=0A
>
=0A
> __________= _____________________________________
=0A
> IPFIX mailing list=
=0A
> IPFIX@ietf.org
=0A
> https://urldefense.pro= ofpoint.com/v2/url?u=3Dhttps-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_ipfix&d= =3DDwICAg&c=3DIL_XqQWOjubgfqINi2jTzg&r=3DXx9729xYDYoCgBDdcp1FKt5Py= Yd1TCoXNKhyPY8CFp8&m=3De8U_gPwC_H2I5yK7XMm7IZ29PU1rg0wNbPsJvDG6RDI&= ;s=3DlOUrCUQVhsdnIWvSTJycjdy-0V6yZZ9NvjU2N-wZn18&e=3D
=0A
&nb= sp;
=0A
_______________________________________________
=0A<= div>IPFIX mailing list
=0A
IPFIX@ietf.org
=0A
https://ww= w.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipfix
=0A
 
=0A
 <= /div>=0A
=0A ------=_001_NextPart832001274031_=------ From nobody Wed Feb 15 19:15:29 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ipfix@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C191295FA; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 19:15:23 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.59 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.59 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0YX_xJMl8J09; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 19:15:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from cmccmta2.chinamobile.com (cmccmta2.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A69BF12996D; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 19:15:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.13]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app06-12006 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee658a51943162-b55dc; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:15:15 +0800 (CST) X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee658a51943162-b55dc X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000 Received: from cmcc-PC (unknown[223.72.55.167]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr07-12007 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee758a51941e50-9ee2e; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:15:15 +0800 (CST) X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee758a51941e50-9ee2e Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:15:17 +0800 From: "lizhenqiang@chinamobile.com" To: grow-bounces , zhoutianran References: , <7023a95c-c6a9-4d6a-b009-8f35e447aa4e@gmail.com>, <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C9279357F4EA@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> X-Priority: 3 X-Has-Attach: no X-Mailer: Foxmail 7, 2, 7, 164[cn] Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <2017021611151726192539@chinamobile.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart588125845745_=----" Archived-At: Cc: opsawg , opsawg-chairs , grow , "ipfix@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [IPFIX] [GROW] [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02 X-BeenThere: ipfix@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFIX WG discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 03:15:23 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_001_NextPart588125845745_=---- Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 RGVhciBJZ25hcywNCg0KVGhhbmsgeW91IHZlcnkgbXVjaCBmb3IgeW91ciBzdXBwb3J0IGFuZCBz dWdnZXN0aW9uLg0KDQpTaW5jZSB0aGUgcHJvYmxlbSB0byBiZSBzb2x2ZWQgaW4gdGhpcyBkcmFm dCBjb21lcyBmcm9tIHRoZSBmaWVsZCBuZXR3b3JrLCB3ZSBvbmx5IHByb3ZpZGUgdGhlIG1ldGhv ZCB0byBjYXJyeSBzdGFuZGFyZCBCR1AgY29tbW11bml0aWVzIGluIElQRklYLiBFeHRlbmRlZCBj b21tdW5pdGllcyBhcmUgdXN1c2xseSB1c2VkIGZvciBvdGhlciBwdXJwb3NlcyB0aGFuIHN0YW5k YXJkIGNvbW11bml0aWVzLCBzdWNoIGFzIHJvdXRlIHRhcmdldCwgYWN0aW9ucyBmb3IgQkdQIGZs b3dzcGVjIGV0Yy4gV2hldGhlciBvciBub3Qgd2UgcmVhbGx5IG5lZWQgdG8gY292ZXIgZW50ZW5k ZWQgY29tbXVuaXRpZXMsIEkgd2FudCB0byBzZWUgbW9yZSBjb21tZW50cy4gTGFyZ2UgY29tbXVu aXRpZXMgYXJlIHJlbGF2aXRlbHkgbmV3LiBSRkM4MDkyIHdhcyBwdWJsaXNoZWQgcmVjZW50bGx5 LiAgQW55d2F5LCBob3dldmVyLCBpdCBpcyBlYXN5IGZvciB1cyB0byBjb3ZlciBib3RoIGV4dGVu ZGVkIGNvbW11bml0aWVzIFtSRkM0MzYwXSBhbmQgbGFyZ2UgY29tbXVuaXRpZXMgW1JGQzgwOTJd IGFmdGVyIHRoZSBhZG9wdGlvbiBhbmQgZnVydGhlciBjb21tZW50IGNvbnNlbnN1cy4gVGV4dCBj b250cmlidXRpb24gaXMgd2VsY29tZS4gQnkgdGhlIHdheSwgSSB3YW50IHRvIGtub3cgdGhlIG9w aW5pb25zIGFib3V0IHRoZSB3aWRlIGNvbW11bml0aWVzLiBEbyB3ZSBuZWVkIHRvIGNvdmVyIHRo ZW0gdG9nZXRoZXI/DQoNCkFzIHlvdSBzYWlkLCB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0IHdhcyBhIGdvb2Qgc3RhcnQu IEl0IGhhcyB2YWx1ZSB0byBiZSBhIHdvcmtpbmcgZ3JvdXAgaXRlbS4gV2UgY2FuIGNvbnRpbnVl IHRoZSBjb21tZW50cyBhbmQgZGlzY3Vzc2lvbiBhZnRlciB0aGUgYWRvcHRpb24gYW5kIHdlIHdp bGwgaW1wcm92ZSB0aGUgZG9jdW1lbnQgYWNjb3JkaW5nIHRvIHRoZSBjb25zZW5zdXMuIE9wZXJh dGlvbmFsIGNvbnNpZGVyYXRpb25zIHdpbGwgYmUgY292ZXJlZCBpbiB0aGUgbmV4dCB2ZXJzaW9u Lg0KDQpCZXN0IFJlZ2FyZHMsDQpaaGVucWlhbmcgTGkNCkNoaW5hIE1vYmlsZQ0KIA0KLS0tLS1P cmlnaW5hbCBNZXNzYWdlLS0tLS0NCkZyb206IEdST1cgW21haWx0bzpncm93LWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0 Zi5vcmddIE9uIEJlaGFsZiBPZiBJZ25hcyBCYWdkb25hcw0KU2VudDogVHVlc2RheSwgRmVicnVh cnkgMTQsIDIwMTcgOTo0NiBQTQ0KVG86IFRpYW5yYW4gWmhvdSA8emhvdXRpYW5yYW5AaHVhd2Vp LmNvbT4NCkNjOiBvcHNhd2dAaWV0Zi5vcmc7IG9wc2F3Zy1jaGFpcnNAaWV0Zi5vcmc7IGdyb3dA aWV0Zi5vcmcgZ3Jvd0BpZXRmLm9yZyA8Z3Jvd0BpZXRmLm9yZz4NClN1YmplY3Q6IFJlOiBbR1JP V10gW09QU0FXR10gV0cgYWRvcHRpb24gcG9sbCBmb3IgZHJhZnQtbGktb3BzYXdnLWlwZml4LWJn cC1jb21tdW5pdHktMDINCiANCkhpIHRoZXJlLA0KIA0KW0NvcHlpbmcgR1JPVyBXRyBhcyB0aGlz IG1pZ2h0IGJlIHJlbGV2YW50IHRvIHRoZWlyIGNvdmVyYWdlIGFyZWFzXQ0KIA0KVGhlIGRvY3Vt ZW50IHNlZW1zIHRvIGJlIGEgZ29vZCBzdGFydCBidXQgY292ZXJzIG9ubHkgc3RhbmRhcmQgY29t bXVuaXRpZXMuIFRoaXMgaXMgbm90IHN1ZmZpY2llbnQgZ2l2ZW4gdGhlIHVuaXZlcnNhbCBkZXBs b3ltZW50IG9mIDQgb2N0ZXQgQVNOcy4gQm90aCBleHRlbmRlZCBjb21tdW5pdGllcyBbUkZDNDM2 MF0gYW5kIGxhcmdlIGNvbW11bml0aWVzIFtSRkM4MDkyXSBhcmUgbmVlZGVkIGFuZCBhcmUgdXNl ZCB0byBhZGRyZXNzIHRoZSBzaWduYWxsaW5nIHJlcXVpcmVtZW50cyBmb3IgQVM0IEFTTnMuIEhh dmluZyBzZXBhcmF0ZSBkb2N1bWVudHMgZWFjaCBhZGRyZXNzaW5nIG9ubHkgYSBzcGVjaWZpYyB0 eXBlIG9mIGNvbW11bml0eSBkb2VzIG5vdCBzZWVtIHByYWN0aWNhbCBhbmQgcmF0aW9uYWwuIFRo ZSBkb2N1bWVudCBzaG91bGQgaW5jbHVkZSB0aGUgZGVmaW5pdGlvbnMgZm9yIElFcyBjb3Zlcmlu ZyBleHRlbmRlZCBhbmQgbGFyZ2UgY29tbXVuaXRpZXMuDQogDQpXaGF0IGlzIHRoZSBsb2dpYyBv ZiBzZWxlY3RpbmcgbXVsdGlwbGUgY29tbXVuaXRpZXMgZm9yIGV4cG9ydCB0aGF0IGEgcHJlZml4 IG1heSBoYXZlIGJlZW4gZGVjb3JhdGVkIHdpdGg/IElzIGl0IGFsbCBvZiB0aGVtIGFsbCB0aGUg dGltZT8gVGhlIHVwcGVyIGxpbWl0IG1heSBiZSByZWFjaGluZyAxNjAwMCBzdGFuZGFyZCBjb21t dW5pdGllcyBwZXIgcHJlZml4IC0gd291bGQgdGhhdCBmaXQgaW50byByZXN1bHRpbmcgSVBGSVgg SUU/IElmIHRoZXJlIGlzIGEgbGltaXQsIGhvdyBkb2VzIGl0IHdvcms/IElzIHRoZXJlIGFueSBp bnRlcnByZXRhdGlvbiBkb25lIG9uIHRoZSB2YWx1ZXMgb2YgdGhlIGNvbW11bml0aWVzIChhbGwg dHlwZXMsIG5vdCBqdXN0IHN0YW5kYXJkIG9uZXMpPyBUaG9zZSBhbGwgYXJlIG9wZXJhdGlvbmFs IGNvbnNpZGVyYXRpb25zIGFzcGVjdHMgYW5kIHNob3VsZCBiZSBjb3ZlcmVkIGluIHRoZSBkb2N1 bWVudCwgYXBwZW5kaXggQSBsaWtlbHkgY291bGQgYmUgYSBnb29kIHBsYWNlIGZvciBpdC4NCiAN ClNlY3VyaXR5IGNvbnNpZGVyYXRpb25zIG9uIHRoZSBwcml2YWN5IGFzcGVjdHMgd291bGQgdG8g YmUgY292ZXJlZC4NCiANCklnbmFzDQogDQogDQogDQogDQpPbiAxMy8wMi8yMDE3IDAzOjM2LCBU aWFucmFuIFpob3Ugd3JvdGU6DQo+IERlYXIgT1BTQVdHLA0KPg0KPiBJbiBTZW91bCwgd2UgZ290 IGVub3VnaCBpbnRlcmVzdCBhbmQgcG9zaXRpdmUgcmVzcG9uc2Ugb24gdGhpcyBJUEZJWCBJRSBl eHRlbnNpb24gZHJhZnQuDQo+IEJ5IHRoZSBhdXRob3JzJyByZXF1ZXN0LCB0aGlzIGVtYWlsIHN0 YXJ0cyBhIGZvcm1hbCBwb2xsLiBUaGUgY2hhaXJzIHdvdWxkIGxpa2UgdG8ga25vdyBpZiB0aGUg V0cgcGFydGljaXBhbnRzIGFncmVlIHRoYXQgdGhlIGZvbGxvd2luZyBkb2N1bWVudCBzaG91bGQg YmUgYWRvcHRlZCBhcyBhIFdHIGRvY3VtZW50IGluIE9QU0FXRy4NCj4NCj4gRXhwb3J0IEJHUCBj b21tdW5pdHkgaW5mb3JtYXRpb24gaW4gSVAgRmxvdyBJbmZvcm1hdGlvbiBFeHBvcnQgKElQRklY KQ0KPiBodHRwczovL3Rvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnL2h0bWwvZHJhZnQtbGktb3BzYXdnLWlwZml4LWJn cC1jb21tdW5pdHktMDINCj4NCj4gVGhlIGFkb3B0aW9uIHBvbGwgd2lsbCB0YWtlIHR3byB3ZWVr cy4gUGxlYXNlIGxldCB1cyBrbm93IHlvdXIgb3BpbmlvbiBieSBGZWIgMjcuIEl0IHdvdWxkIGFs c28gYmUgZ29vZCB0byBoZWFyIHdobyBpcyB3aWxsaW5nIHRvIHJldmlldyBhbmQvb3IgaW1wbGVt ZW50IG9yIGRlcGxveSB0aGUgZXh0ZW5zaW9uIGRlc2NyaWJlZCBpbiB0aGUgZG9jdW1lbnQuDQo+ DQo+IFNpbmNlIHdlIGFscmVhZHkgZm91bmQgdGhhdCB0aGUgbWFqb3JpdHkgb2YgdGhlIGYyZiBw YXJ0aWNpcGFudHMgYXQgb3VyIElFVEY5NyBzZXNzaW9uIGxpa2UgdGhpcyBpZGVhLCBwbGVhc2Ug ZG8gc3BlYWsgdXAgbm93IGlmIHlvdSBkbyBub3QgYWdyZWUgb3IgaGF2ZSBzZXJpb3VzIG9iamVj dGlvbnMgKHdpdGggZXhwbGFuYXRpb24gb2YgY291cnNlKS4NCj4NCj4gUmVnYXJkcywNCj4gVGlh bnJhbg0KPg0KPiBfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f Xw0KPiBPUFNBV0cgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0DQo+IE9QU0FXR0BpZXRmLm9yZw0KPiBodHRwczovL3d3 dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL29wc2F3Zw0KIA0KX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCkdST1cgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0DQpHUk9XQGll dGYub3JnDQpodHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2dyb3cNCg== ------=_001_NextPart588125845745_=---- Content-Type: text/html; charset="GB2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0A
Hi Paolo=EF=BC=8C
Thank you for you opinion. The extended and large communities= will be considered after the adoption and according to the working group = consensus.

Please see the appendix  in the d= raft for the example. bgpDestinationCommunityList is a basicList of bgpCom= munity.

If you don't like the BGP communities acc= ording to the source IP of a specific flow, you can indicate it in the tem= plete, i.e. do not specify bgpSourceCommunityList IE in the templete set. = Then the exporter will not export the information. 

bgpSourceCommunityList does have values in some network environmen= ts. For example,  the overalll network of China Mobile consists of a = backbone network and several province networks. Each component network is = configured with a few communities. BGP anounces those communities among th= e component networks. When one province wants to know where (i.e. from whi= ch provinces) its incoming traffic comes from, it can use bgpSou= rceCommunityList.
=0A

Best Regards,
Zhen= qiang
=0A
lizhenqiang@chinamobile.com
<= /span>
=0A
 
From= : Paolo Lucente
Date: 2017-02-17 06:52
Subject:&nb= sp;Re: [GROW] [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-comm= unity-02
 
=0A
Hi,
=0A
&= nbsp;
=0A
I support Ignas comment with regards to Extended and La= rge communities.
=0A
 
=0A
Can you make evident the= role, ie. via an example, of the bgpCommunity
=0A
IE compared to= the one of bgpDestinationCommunityList?
=0A
 
=0A
= Also, i'm puzzled by the presence of bgpSourceCommunityList: i see that=0A
in "1. Introduction" you kind of close that up saying that ther= e is a
=0A
Mediator that would take care of the correlation - und= erstandable but
=0A
then again we all know with a (loosely determ= ined) level of indirection
=0A
any problem can be addressed; sinc= e you also say the draft comes "comes
=0A
from the field network"= , i was wondering whether you were subtending to
=0A
reverse BGP = lookups to make this work in practice. In which case, i'd
=0A
say= warning flag: BGP lookups against the source IP address/prefix of a
= =0A
flow would be of no general applicability at all - think, for exam= ple,
=0A
to the common case of an ISP (remotely) connected to an = IXP where you
=0A
have N BGP peers and hence potentially multiple= advertisements per
=0A
prefix, which one you pick for correlatio= n would not be a deterministic
=0A
exercise.
=0A
 <= /div>=0A
Paolo
=0A
 
=0A
 
=0A
&g= t; On 16 Feb 2017, at 04:15, lizhenqiang@chinamobile.com wrote:
=0A>
=0A
> Dear Ignas,
=0A
>
=0A
>= ; Thank you very much for your support and suggestion.
=0A
> <= /div>=0A
> Since the problem to be solved in this draft comes from = the field network, we only provide the method to carry standard BGP commmu= nities in IPFIX. Extended communities are ususlly used for other purposes = than standard communities, such as route target, actions for BGP flowspec = etc. Whether or not we really need to cover entended communities, I want t= o see more comments. Large communities are relavitely new. RFC8092 was pub= lished recentlly.  Anyway, however, it is easy for us to cover both e= xtended communities [RFC4360] and large communities [RFC8092] after the ad= option and further comment consensus. Text contribution is welcome. By the= way, I want to know the opinions about the wide communities. Do we need t= o cover them together?
=0A
>
=0A
> As you said, t= his draft was a good start. It has value to be a working group item. We ca= n continue the comments and discussion after the adoption and we will impr= ove the document according to the consensus. Operational considerations wi= ll be covered in the next version.
=0A
>
=0A
> Be= st Regards,
=0A
> Zhenqiang Li
=0A
> China Mobile<= /div>=0A
> 
=0A
> -----Original Message-----=0A
> From: GROW [mailto:grow-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ignas= Bagdonas
=0A
> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 9:46 PM
= =0A
> To: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
=0A
= > Cc: opsawg@ietf.org; opsawg-chairs@ietf.org; grow@ietf.org grow@ietf.= org <grow@ietf.org>
=0A
> Subject: Re: [GROW] [OPSAWG] W= G adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02
=0A
&g= t; 
=0A
> Hi there,
=0A
> 
=0A> [Copying GROW WG as this might be relevant to their coverage areas]=
=0A
> 
=0A
> The document seems to be a goo= d start but covers only standard communities. This is not sufficient given= the universal deployment of 4 octet ASNs. Both extended communities [RFC4= 360] and large communities [RFC8092] are needed and are used to address th= e signalling requirements for AS4 ASNs. Having separate documents each add= ressing only a specific type of community does not seem practical and rati= onal. The document should include the definitions for IEs covering extende= d and large communities.
=0A
> 
=0A
> What i= s the logic of selecting multiple communities for export that a prefix may= have been decorated with? Is it all of them all the time? The upper limit= may be reaching 16000 standard communities per prefix - would that fit in= to resulting IPFIX IE? If there is a limit, how does it work? Is there any= interpretation done on the values of the communities (all types, not just= standard ones)? Those all are operational considerations aspects and shou= ld be covered in the document, appendix A likely could be a good place for= it.
=0A
> 
=0A
> Security considerations on= the privacy aspects would to be covered.
=0A
> 
= =0A
> Ignas
=0A
> 
=0A
> 
= =0A
> 
=0A
> 
=0A
> On 13/02/20= 17 03:36, Tianran Zhou wrote:
=0A
> > Dear OPSAWG,
=0A=
> >
=0A
> > In Seoul, we got enough interest and= positive response on this IPFIX IE extension draft.
=0A
> >= ; By the authors' request, this email starts a formal poll. The chairs wou= ld like to know if the WG participants agree that the following document s= hould be adopted as a WG document in OPSAWG.
=0A
> >
= =0A
> > Export BGP community information in IP Flow Information = Export (IPFIX)
=0A
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li= -opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02
=0A
> >
=0A
> &g= t; The adoption poll will take two weeks. Please let us know your opinion = by Feb 27. It would also be good to hear who is willing to review and/or i= mplement or deploy the extension described in the document.
=0A
&= gt; >
=0A
> > Since we already found that the majority o= f the f2f participants at our IETF97 session like this idea, please do spe= ak up now if you do not agree or have serious objections (with explanation= of course).
=0A
> >
=0A
> > Regards,
= =0A
> > Tianran
=0A
> >
=0A
> > __= _____________________________________________
=0A
> > OPSAW= G mailing list
=0A
> > OPSAWG@ietf.org
=0A
> &g= t; https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
=0A
>  =0A
> _______________________________________________
=0A<= div>> GROW mailing list
=0A
> GROW@ietf.org
=0A
&g= t; https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
=0A
> __________= _____________________________________
=0A
> GROW mailing list<= /div>=0A
> GROW@ietf.org
=0A
> https://www.ietf.org/mai= lman/listinfo/grow
=0A
 
=0A
 
=0A
<= /blockquote>=0A ------=_001_NextPart511787134451_=------