From pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Mon May 2 05:43:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F768E0742 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 05:43:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kDLP-os0wQjk for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 05:43:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E890E06BA for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 05:43:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F08D179532; Mon, 2 May 2011 08:43:09 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Delivered-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Received: from USA7109MR001.ACS-INC.COM (usa7109mr001.acs-inc.com [63.101.151.9]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD097952E for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 08:42:53 -0400 (EDT) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkkCAH2lvk0Nh9IPmWdsb2JhbACCYpVxjUkUAQEBAQEICwsHFCXACoMfgmEEhg6NDYog X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,302,1301893200"; d="scan'208,217";a="35781233" Received: from usa0300gw002.na.xerox.net ([13.135.210.15]) by USA7109MR001.ACS-INC.COM with ESMTP; 02 May 2011 07:42:52 -0500 Received: from USA7061MS04.na.xerox.net ([13.151.235.15]) by USA0300GW002.na.xerox.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 2 May 2011 08:42:51 -0400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 05:42:49 -0700 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: PWG Candidate Standard MFD Model and Common Semantics [PWG 5108.1-2011] Thread-Index: AcwIxnHRAlm6vNYkTHeIJLZsMHlkXA== From: "Zehler, Peter" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 May 2011 12:42:51.0912 (UTC) FILETIME=[73600080:01CC08C6] X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Subject: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Candidate Standard MFD Model and Common Semantics [PWG 5108.1-2011] X-BeenThere: pwg-announce@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Printer Working Group Announcement List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1828886903==" Sender: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: F08D179532.AC4F9 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============1828886903== Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CC08C6.72769AAD" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CC08C6.72769AAD Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All, =20 The newly approved PWG Candidate Standard "MFD Model and Common Semantics" [PWG 5108.1-2011] is posted on the PWG server at: =20 =20 it's also listed on the PWG standards web page with the Abstract at: < http://www.pwg.org/standards.html>=20 =20 The MFD Working group page has been updated with the approved specification and includes links to the associated schema and the official namespace. The MFD page is available at: =20 =20 Peter Zehler Chair of PWG's MFD Working Group =20 =20 Peter Zehler Xerox Research Center Webster Email: Peter.Zehler@Xerox.com =20 Voice: (585) 265-8755 FAX: (585) 265-7441 US Mail: Peter Zehler Xerox Corp. 800 Phillips Rd. M/S 128-25E Webster NY, 14580-9701=20 =20 --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CC08C6.72769AAD Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

All,<= /p>

 

The newly= approved PWG Candidate Standard "MFD Model and Common Semantics"= [PWG 5108.1-2011] is posted on the PWG server at:

<ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/candidates/cs-sm20-= mfdmodel10-20110415-5108.1.pdf>

=  

it's also listed on the PWG stand= ards web page with the Abstract at:

<= http://www.pwg.org/standards= .html>

 

The MFD Working group page has been updated with the appro= ved specification and includes links to the associated schema and the offic= ial namespace.  The MFD page is available at:

<http://www.pwg.org/mfd<= /a>>

 

Peter Zehler

Chair of PWG&#= 8217;s MFD Working Group

 

 <= /span>

Peter Zehler

<= /span>Xerox Research Center Webster
Email: Peter.Zehler@Xerox.com<= /span>
Voice: (585) 26= 5-8755
FAX: (585) 265-7441=
US Mail: Peter Zehler
Xerox Corp.
800 Phillips Rd.
M/S 128-25E
= Webster NY, 14580-9701

 

=

--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CC08C6.72769AAD-- --===============1828886903== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pwg-announce mailing list pwg-announce@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/pwg-announce --===============1828886903==-- From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Mon May 2 09:32:03 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25732E0767 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 09:32:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.597 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_MOSTLY=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id erBdFqUOGyfy for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 09:31:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB932E076C for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 09:31:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9957479539; Mon, 2 May 2011 12:31:31 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from dccmail2.digital-controls.com (dccmail2.digital-controls.com [198.136.170.48]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FBE479508 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 12:31:13 -0400 (EDT) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: RE: [IPP] Requested Additions to PWG Raster Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 12:32:46 -0400 Message-ID: <00FBBC022DE8574E89974FF263FFCC3C0DC8AE@dccmail2.digital-controls.com> In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [IPP] Requested Additions to PWG Raster Thread-Index: AcwBEXudyPnODO4USgqcmUyVuJkoSgAABkOgAJcp8aA= References: <0B621406-8CE5-4E3E-8DE5-332E383911D4@apple.com> From: "Rich Gray" To: "Petrie, Glen" , "Michael Sweet" X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: ipp@pwg.org X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0810290352==" Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 9957479539.AA26C X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============0810290352== Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CC08E6.91E1016D" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CC08E6.91E1016D Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ok, I'll wander in from the peanut gallery and probably expose my ignorance. I've only been following these festivities loosely, but the posts about total pages and then then the desire for a compressed size did catch my attention. Looking over ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippraster10-20110327-rev.pdf , from a server perspective, it bothers me greatly that it is not possible to find and extract pages from this format without uncompressing the images out to the desired page(s). Yes, the server will probably have the resources (disk and processor) to accomplish this, but given these are by definition large files, it seems like a bloody waste. If this is to become a widely used format, then ideally, it should be possible for a server to ingest and send these pages on their way with minimal overhead, unless the server really has to do some sort of reformatting. =20 I see two possibilities to make it easier on servers: 1. chunk the data 2. take a page from the PDF format and write the size of the preceding image data into a field in the FOLLOWING page header. This would require some sort of trailer record on the file. With this, a server could run backwards through the file, stepping from header to header and with low overhead find any desired page in the file.=20=20 =20 My humble $.02 =20 Rich =20 Richard B. Gray Senior Software Engineer Plus Technologies LLC 444 Alexandersville Road Miamisburg, OH 45342-3568 +1 937-847-0614 ext. 2405 +1 937-384-0842 fax 877-899-7587 toll free rgray@plustechnologies.com www.plustechnologies.com ________________________________ From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org [mailto:ipp-bounces@pwg.org] On Behalf Of Petrie, Glen Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 1:33 PM To: Michael Sweet Cc: ipp@pwg.org Subject: RE: [IPP] Requested Additions to PWG Raster As stated below, I do understand objection to adding the field. I would to hear from other PWG members on the addition of these fields. =20 Glen =20 =20 ________________________________ From: Michael Sweet [mailto:msweet@apple.com]=20 Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 10:20 AM To: Petrie, Glen Cc: ipp@pwg.org Subject: Re: [IPP] Requested Additions to PWG Raster =20 On Apr 22, 2011, at 9:34 AM, Petrie, Glen wrote: =09 ...=20 [gwp] The important case is the size of the compressed raster data. The decompressed size is recorded only if the raster is uncompressed. [gwp] I agree that some (a few or a lot) of implementation may not provide the information but as I said, I am requesting that the assignment be made and those who can (want to) may record the size information. =20 It really isn't a matter of "may not provide", in most cases clients (and printers) simply can't buffer hundreds of megabytes of raster data. I can add the field, but since most producers of PWG Raster will not be able to supply the compressed size of the raster no printer will be able to depend on it anyways, so IMHO it is best to have the printer, if it is going to do any local processing of full page images, use its own optimal internal storage format than try to gerry-rig something into the format that just won't work. =20 [gwp] As I stated in my original request, I am not worried about the printer, it will accept the streaming input just fine. I want the size information for navigation of a many page raster without having to decompress pages in a serial manor. I am not jerry-rigging anything. I do not understand your comment "that just won't work". It works fine. In fact, I wrote a routine that will find the size-only of compressed page by running the compression routine without storing the compressed data. I don't understand your objection to assigning the field. =09=20 ...=20 I would actually prefer to flag the file as version 3 which is an uncompressed CUPS Raster with the version 2 page header. And in the case of local processing, you'll likely want to use native word order (another feature of CUPS Raster that we are not bringing along for PWG Raster...) =09=20 [gwp] Do you mean big/little-endian? I am nothing requesting the word ordering flag (value) be used. The current specification is ok. =20 My main point was that if you are concerned about having a standard representation for intermediate data, CUPS Raster already provides that. If you are trying to tweak PWG Raster for use as an internal representation format then I'd rather not put that in the standard since internal formats are OOS for any PWG standard. Would it be sufficient to document an uncompressed version of PWG Raster (with the "RAS3" file header) and then mark the native word order support as out-of-scope for the spec but something that might be used internally? =20 [gwp] I believe the RAS3 is for the entire PWG Raster file. I am requesting a flags (value) for individual pages.=20=20 =20 Since the format does not support this, I would be opposed to adding something that would be used only for an internal representation of a PWG Raster file. =20 [gwp] Again, I do not understand your objection.=20 =20 ________________________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair =20 --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and=20 dangerous content by MailScanner , and is believed to be clean.=20 --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CC08E6.91E1016D Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Ok, I'll wander in from the peanut gallery and pro= bably=20 expose my ignorance.  I've only been following these festivities loose= ly,=20 but the posts about total pages and then then the desire for a compressed s= ize=20 did catch my attention.   Looking over ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippraster10-20110327-rev.pdf , from=20 a server perspective, it bothers me greatly that it is not possible to= find=20 and extract pages from this format without uncompressing the images out to = the=20 desired page(s).  Yes, the server will probably have the resources (di= sk=20 and processor) to accomplish this, but given these are by definition large= =20 files, it seems like a bloody waste.   If this is to become a wid= ely=20 used format, then ideally, it should be possible for a server to ingest and= send=20 these pages on their way with minimal overhead, unless the server really ha= s to=20 do some sort of reformatting.
 
I see two possibilities to make it easier on=20 servers:
1. chunk the data
2. take a page from the PDF format and write the s= ize of=20 the preceding image data into a field in the FOLLOWING=20 page header.  This would require some sort of trailer record on t= he=20 file.   With this, a server could run backwards through the = file,=20 stepping from header to header and with low overhead find any desired page = in=20 the file. 
 
My humble $.02
 
Rich
 
Richard B. Gray
Senior Software= =20 Engineer
Plus Technologies LLC
444 Alexandersville Road
Miamisburg= , OH=20 45342-3568
+1 937-847-0614 ext. 2405
+1 937-384-0842 fax
877-899-7= 587=20 toll=20 free
rgray@plustechnologies.com
www.plustechnologies.com

From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org=20 [mailto:ipp-bounces@pwg.org] On Behalf Of Petrie, Glen
Sent:=20 Friday, April 22, 2011 1:33 PM
To: Michael Sweet
Cc:=20 ipp@pwg.org
Subject: RE: [IPP] Requested Additions to PWG=20 Raster

As stated belo= w, I do=20 understand objection to adding the field.  I would to hear from other = PWG=20 members on the addition of these fields.

 

Glen

 

 

From: Michael=20 Sweet [mailto:msweet@apple.com]
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 10:20= =20 AM
To: Petrie, Glen
<= B>Cc: ipp@pwg.org
Subject: Re: [IPP] Requested Additio= ns to=20 PWG Raster

 

On Apr 22, 2011, at 9:34 AM, Petrie, Glen=20 wrote:

... 

[gwp] The im= portant=20 case is the size of the compressed raster data. The decompressed size is= =20 recorded only if the raster is=20 uncompressed.

[gwp] I agre= e that=20 some (a few or a lot) of implementation may not provide the information b= ut as=20 I said, I am requesting that the assignment be made and those who can (wa= nt=20 to) may record the size=20 information.

<= /SPAN>

 

It really isn't a matter of "may not provide", in= most=20 cases clients (and printers) simply can't buffer hundreds of megabytes of r= aster=20 data. I can add the field, but since most producers of PWG Raster will not = be=20 able to supply the compressed size of the raster no printer will be able to= =20 depend on it anyways, so IMHO it is best to have the printer, if it is goin= g to=20 do any local processing of full page images, use its own optimal internal= =20 storage format than try to gerry-rig something into the format that just wo= n't=20 work.

<= SPAN=20 style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 12pt; COLOR: blue"> 

[gwp] As I sta= ted in=20 my original request, I am not worried about the printer, it will accept the= =20 streaming input just fine.  I want the size information for navigation= of a=20 many page raster without having to decompress pages in a serial manor.=20   I am not jerry-rigging anything.  I do not understand your= =20 comment “that just won’t work”.  It works fine. = ; In fact, I wrote a=20 routine that will find the size-only of compressed page by running the=20 compression routine without storing the compressed data.  I don’= t=20 understand your objection to assigning the=20 field.

&nb= sp;

... 

I would actually prefer to flag the file as ver= sion 3=20 which is an uncompressed CUPS Raster with the version 2 page header. And = in=20 the case of local processing, you'll likely want to use native word order= =20 (another feature of CUPS Raster that we are not bringing along for PWG=20 Raster...)

 <= o:p>

[gwp] Do you= mean=20 big/little-endian?  I am nothing requesting the word ordering flag= =20 (value) be used.  The current specification is=20 ok.

 

My main point was that if you are concerned about= having=20 a standard representation for intermediate data, CUPS Raster already provid= es=20 that. If you are trying to tweak PWG Raster for use as an internal=20 representation format then I'd rather not put that in the standard since=20 internal formats are OOS for any PWG=20 standard.



Would it be sufficient to document an uncompresse= d=20 version of PWG Raster (with the "RAS3" file header) and then mark the nativ= e=20 word order support as out-of-scope for the spec but something that might be= used=20 internally?

 

[gwp] I believ= e the=20 RAS3 is for the entire PWG Raster file.  I am requesting a flags (valu= e)=20 for individual pages.=20  

 

Since the format does not support this, I would b= e=20 opposed to adding something that would be used only for an internal=20 representation of a PWG Raster file.

 

[gwp] Again, I= do not=20 understand your objection.

 

_________= _______________________________________________________________
Michael= =20 Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG=20 Chair

 

<= BR>--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by = MailScanner, and is
be= lieved=20 to be clean.
--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CC08E6.91E1016D-- --===============0810290352== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp --===============0810290352==-- From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Mon May 2 11:15:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAFEFE0688 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 11:15:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.597 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VW4NIznvus26 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 11:15:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7390E0678 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 11:15:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5A9979541; Mon, 2 May 2011 14:15:04 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from mail-out.apple.com (mail-out.apple.com [17.151.62.50]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED4C79534 for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 14:14:50 -0400 (EDT) MIME-version: 1.0 Received: from relay13.apple.com ([17.128.113.29]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPS id <0LKK008B0YEF5GS0@mail-out.apple.com> for ipp@pwg.org; Mon, 02 May 2011 11:14:49 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 1180711d-b7c70ae00000719a-c5-4dbef498aca1 Received: from da0704a-dhcp142.apple.com (da0704a-dhcp142.apple.com [17.197.43.142]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay13.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 37.99.29082.994FEBD4; Mon, 02 May 2011 11:14:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Michael Sweet Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 11:14:48 -0700 To: ipp@pwg.org Message-id: <78F74F2F-96E3-49D8-B589-6B01777AA91F@apple.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Subject: [IPP] Minutes posted from today's conference call X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1454624284==" Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: C5A9979541.A7736 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org --===============1454624284== Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_oYWXMCcI5b4bRlw5HETNzA)" --Boundary_(ID_oYWXMCcI5b4bRlw5HETNzA) Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT All, I have posted the minutes from today's conference call at: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/minutes/ippv2-concall-minutes-20110502.pdf Action items: Action: Mike to issue new draft of JPS3 with changes accepted up to section 5.5.14 Action: Mike to prepare draft slides for IPP sessions for next concall Action: Andrew to provide section 4.4 UPNP discovery text (ONGOING - for next F2F) Action: Mike and Paul to reach out to label/portable printer vendors to join IPP WG discussions (ONGOING - both to send summary to ipp list and details to SC list) ________________________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --Boundary_(ID_oYWXMCcI5b4bRlw5HETNzA) Content-type: text/html; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT All,

I have posted the minutes from today's conference call at:


Action items:
  • Action: Mike to issue new draft of JPS3 with changes accepted up to section 5.5.14
  • Action: Mike to prepare draft slides for IPP sessions for next concall
  • Action: Andrew to provide section 4.4 UPNP discovery text (ONGOING - for next F2F)
  • Action: Mike and Paul to reach out to label/portable printer vendors to join IPP WG discussions (ONGOING - both to send summary to ipp list and details to SC list)
________________________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --Boundary_(ID_oYWXMCcI5b4bRlw5HETNzA)-- --===============1454624284== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp --===============1454624284==-- From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Mon May 2 21:44:24 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F8DE06DD for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 21:44:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ldW5LqOsHcGg for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 21:44:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECE83E065B for ; Mon, 2 May 2011 21:44:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1ED179545; Tue, 3 May 2011 00:44:02 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from mail-out.apple.com (mail-out.apple.com [17.151.62.50]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CADB79544 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 00:43:44 -0400 (EDT) MIME-version: 1.0 Received: from relay16.apple.com ([17.128.113.55]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTP id <0LKL007JPRSSJOQ0@mail-out.apple.com> for ipp@pwg.org; Mon, 02 May 2011 21:43:43 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807137-b7cd4ae000003108-04-4dbf87fd2f0c Received: from [17.151.72.195] (Unknown_Domain [17.151.72.195]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay16.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 4E.A6.12552.EF78FBD4; Mon, 02 May 2011 21:43:42 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [IPP] Requested Additions to PWG Raster From: Michael Sweet In-reply-to: <00FBBC022DE8574E89974FF263FFCC3C0DC8AE@dccmail2.digital-controls.com> Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 21:43:41 -0700 Message-id: References: <0B621406-8CE5-4E3E-8DE5-332E383911D4@apple.com> <00FBBC022DE8574E89974FF263FFCC3C0DC8AE@dccmail2.digital-controls.com> To: Rich Gray X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1222) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: ipp@pwg.org X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1256175624==" Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: C1ED179545.A990F X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org --===============1256175624== Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_8djg0s5kPgF+sHeVgpu6wA)" --Boundary_(ID_8djg0s5kPgF+sHeVgpu6wA) Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT On May 2, 2011, at 9:32 AM, Rich Gray wrote: > Ok, I'll wander in from the peanut gallery and probably expose my ignorance. I've only been following these festivities loosely, but the posts about total pages and then then the desire for a compressed size did catch my attention. Looking over ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippraster10-20110327-rev.pdf , from a server perspective, it bothers me greatly that it is not possible to find and extract pages from this format without uncompressing the images out to the desired page(s). Yes, the server will probably have the resources (disk and processor) to accomplish this, but given these are by definition large files, it seems like a bloody waste. If this is to become a widely used format, then ideally, it should be possible for a server to ingest and send these pages on their way with minimal overhead, unless the server really has to do some sort of reformatting. If you want random access, you'll either want to do reformatting or generate an index of the PWG Raster file. Any server will be able to rapidly index a raster file... (and keep in mind that a server will likely advertise support for a higher-level format like PDF anyways, so the client will likely supply that instead of PWG Raster...) > I see two possibilities to make it easier on servers: > > 1. chunk the data Since we are not trying to define a new format, this isn't an option. > 2. take a page from the PDF format and write the size of the preceding image data into a field in the FOLLOWING page header. This would require some sort of trailer record on the file. With this, a server could run backwards through the file, stepping from header to header and with low overhead find any desired page in the file. Since CUPS Raster (the base format we are using for PWG Raster) does not have a trailer, we have no opportunity to do this, either. __________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --Boundary_(ID_8djg0s5kPgF+sHeVgpu6wA) Content-type: text/html; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Ok, I'= ll wander in from the peanut gallery and probably expose my ignorance. = ; I've only been following these festivities loosely, but the posts about t= otal pages and then then the desire for a compressed size did catch my atte= ntion.   Looking over = ftp://ftp.pwg.org= /pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippraster10-20110327-rev.pdf , from= a server perspective, it bothers me greatly that it is not possible t= o find and extract pages from this format without uncompressing the images = out to the desired page(s).  Yes, the server will probably have the re= sources (disk and processor) to accomplish this, but given these are by def= inition large files, it seems like a bloody waste.   If this is t= o become a widely used format, then ideally, it should be possible for a se= rver to ingest and send these pages on their way with minimal overhead, unl= ess the server really has to do some sort of reformatting.

If you want random access, you'= ll either want to do reformatting or generate an index of the PWG Raster fi= le. Any server will be able to rapidly index a raster file...
(and keep in mind that a server will likely advertise support f= or a higher-level format like PDF anyways, so the client will likely supply= that instead of PWG Raster...)

I see two possibilities to make it easier on ser= vers:
 
1. chunk the data

Since we are= not trying to define a new format, this isn't an option.

= 2. take a page from the PDF format and write the size of the prec= eding image data into a field in the FOLLOWING page header. = This would require some sort of trailer record on the file.   Wi= th this, a server could run backwards through the file, stepping from = header to header and with low overhead find any desired page in the file.

Since CUPS Raste= r (the base format we are using for PWG Raster) does not have a trailer, we= have no opportunity to do this, either.

_______________________________________= ___________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, = PWG Chair


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --Boundary_(ID_8djg0s5kPgF+sHeVgpu6wA)-- --===============1256175624== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp --===============1256175624==-- From pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Wed May 4 09:46:49 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D187E074B for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 09:46:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.002 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h2zWRc7-lJor for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 09:46:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C330EE07A0 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 09:46:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6CFC79542; Wed, 4 May 2011 12:46:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Delivered-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Received: from mail4.sharplabs.com (mail4.sharplabs.com [216.65.151.214]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F857953D for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 12:46:05 -0400 (EDT) X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1304527561-0208080800423730001-asKuw5 Received: from cabex1.sharpamericas.com ([172.29.222.244]) by mail4.sharplabs.com with ESMTP id YjA0ltyUO1PMCPpo for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 09:46:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: jmurdock@sharplabs.com Received: from wabex3.sharpamericas.com ([172.29.224.10]) by cabex1.sharpamericas.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 4 May 2011 09:46:01 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 X-Barracuda-BBL-IP: 172.29.224.10 X-Barracuda-RBL-IP: 172.29.224.10 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [Pwg-Announce] Approved IDS Charter posted Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 09:45:59 -0700 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: [Pwg-Announce] Approved IDS Charter posted Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [Pwg-Announce] Approved IDS Charter posted Thread-Index: AcwKeperm2Rn7OTnSJ+Xlh7M/Fp2wg== From: "Murdock, Joe" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 May 2011 16:46:01.0487 (UTC) FILETIME=[C043F9F0:01CC0A7A] X-Barracuda-Connect: UNKNOWN[172.29.222.244] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1304527561 X-Barracuda-URL: http://mail4.enet.sharplabs.com:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at sharplabs.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.02 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.02 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=9.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE, THREAD_INDEX, THREAD_TOPIC X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.62766 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.01 THREAD_INDEX thread-index: AcO7Y8iR61tzADqsRmmc5wNiFHEOig== 0.01 THREAD_TOPIC Thread-Topic: ...(Japanese Subject)... 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean X-BeenThere: pwg-announce@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Printer Working Group Announcement List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0591455810==" Sender: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: E6CFC79542.AC7F0 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============0591455810== Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CC0A7A.BF7A06C5" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CC0A7A.BF7A06C5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The updated and SC approved IDS charter has been posted to the PWG FTP site: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ids/charter/ch-ids-charter-201100503.pdf=20 =20 Joe =20 --------------------------------------- Joe Murdock Principal Engineer and Researcher Co-Chair IEEE/ISTO Printer Working Group Imaging Device Security Sharp Labs of America 5750 NW Pacific Rim Blvd Camas, WA 98607 (360) 817-7542 jmurdock@sharplabs.com =20 =20 --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CC0A7A.BF7A06C5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The updated and = SC approved IDS charter has been posted to the PWG FTP site:

=

ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ids/charter/ch-ids-chart= er-201100503.pdf

 <= /p>

Joe

 <= /o:p>

-------------= --------------------------

Joe Murdock

Principal Engineer and Researcher=

Co-Ch= air IEEE/ISTO Printer Working Group Imaging Device Security

Sharp Labs of Am= erica

5750 NW Pacific Rim Blvd

Camas, WA 98607

(360) 817-7542

jmurdock@sharplabs.com=

 

=

--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CC0A7A.BF7A06C5-- --===============0591455810== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pwg-announce mailing list pwg-announce@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/pwg-announce --===============0591455810==-- From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Wed May 4 12:58:28 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F4B3E0700 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 12:58:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o+EntjoUO7kp for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 12:58:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45D8FE0795 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 12:58:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95B9D7958C; Wed, 4 May 2011 15:58:01 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from EEAEX01.us.epson.net (eeaex01.eea.epson.com [12.9.144.164]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2FAC79516 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 15:57:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from EEAEX03.us.epson.net ([148.130.32.21]) by EEAEX01.us.epson.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 4 May 2011 12:57:44 -0700 x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: RE: [IPP] Question on PWG draft specification mismatch & parsing Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 12:57:43 -0700 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [IPP] Question on PWG draft specification mismatch & parsing Thread-Index: AcwGKC6k7pqY5RReTfaK9PqMCV6DngEbDBGg References: From: "Petrie, Glen" To: "Michael Sweet" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 May 2011 19:57:44.0052 (UTC) FILETIME=[88541B40:01CC0A95] X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: ipp@pwg.org X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1421132044==" Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 95B9D7958C.AA40E X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============1421132044== Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CC0A95.87B806ED" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CC0A95.87B806ED Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I was looking some of the PWGR images you provided. I expected the sgray-8 to have 8 bits/color and 8 bits/pixel but the file shows 24 bits/pixel. Which is correct? =20 Glen =20 =20 ________________________________ From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org [mailto:ipp-bounces@pwg.org] On Behalf Of Roy Samuel Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 9:47 PM To: ipp@pwg.org; Michael Sweet Subject: [IPP] Question on PWG draft specification mismatch & parsing =20 Hi Michael, =20 I had downloaded the sample PWGRaster files from: http://ftp.easysw.com/pub/cups/examples/PWGRasterSamples.zip, with your latest working draft of the PWG raster found at: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippraster10-20110327-rev.pdf. I compared the raster files in the folders: PWGRasterSamples\srgb-16 & PWGRasterSamples\srgb-8, with the specs given in the draft document. =20 I found that neither of the directories contained files that adhered to the draft document w.r.t parsing the header. Specifically for the value of 'NumColors'.=20 =20 --1-- According to the draft document, bytes 420-423 need to contain 'NumColors' value, however, I found them to be zero. Are the sample files outdated?? =20 --2-- Based on the decode algorithm given in the draft document, I had tried to obtain plain RGB raster data from a pwg-raster file. I had converted the PDF document obtained here: http://orenyomtov.com/downloads/testpage.pdf to obtain pwg-raster file using Google cloud print. I am able to get the pwg-raster file from GCP successfully. However, on converting the pwg-raster file to RGB data, I have been successful in decoding around 1/6th or so, to raster data successfully, i.e. the top part of the page is being rendered successfully, while the rest is not rendered. (I use GIMP to open the output raster file in RAW mode). I have attached a screenshot of the output file that I'm able to view through GIMP (scaled down version). =20 Is my algorithm wrong? Or are the specs incorrect? =20 Regards. _________________________________________________ Roy Samuel | Celstream Technologies | www.celstream.com =20 =20 =20 --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and=20 dangerous content by MailScanner , and is believed to be clean.=20 ________________________________________________________________________ ______ DISCLAIMER: This electronic message and any attachments to this electronic message is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and confidential information. It is the=20 property of Celstream Technologies Pvt Limited. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby strictly notified not to copy, forward, distribute or use this message or any attachments thereto. If you have received this message in error, please delete it and all copies thereof, from your system and notify the sender at Celstream Technologies or=20 administrator@celstream.com immediately. ________________________________________________________________________ ______ --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CC0A95.87B806ED Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I was looking some of the PWGR images you provided.  I expected the sgray-8 to have 8 bits/color and 8 bits/= pixel but the file shows 24 bits/pixel.  Which is correct?=

 

Glen

 

 

From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org [mailto:ipp-bounces@pwg.org] On Behalf Of Roy Samuel
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 20= 11 9:47 PM
To: ipp@pwg.org; Michael Swe= et
Subject: [IPP] Question on P= WG draft specification mismatch & parsing

 

Hi Michael,

 

I had downloaded the sample PWGRaster files from: http:= //ftp.easysw.com/pub/cups/examples/PWGRasterSamples.zip, with your latest working draft of the PWG raster found at: f= tp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippraster10-20110327-rev.pdf. I compared the raster files in the folders:

PWGRasterSamples\srgb-16  &

PWGRasterSamples\srgb-8, with the specs given in the draft document.

 

I found that neither of the directories contained files that adhered to the d= raft document w.r.t parsing the header. Specifically for the value of ‘NumColors’.

 

--1--

According to the draft document, bytes 420-423 need to contain ‘NumColors’ value, however, I found them to be zero. Are the sample files outdated??

 

--2--

Based on the decode algorithm given in the draft document, I had tried to obtain plain RGB raster data from a pwg-raster file. I had converted the PDF docum= ent obtained here: htt= p://orenyomtov.com/downloads/testpage.pdf to obtain pwg-raster file using Google cloud print. I am able to get the pw= g-raster file from GCP successfully. However, on converting the pwg-raster file to R= GB data,  I have been successful in decoding around 1/6th or s= o, to raster data successfully, i.e. the top part of the page is being rendered successfully, while the rest is not rendered.

(I use GIMP to open the output raster file in RAW mode).

I have attached a screenshot of the output file that I’m able to view through GIMP (scaled down version).

 

Is my algorithm wrong? Or are the specs incorrect?

 

Regards.

______________= ___________________________________

Roy Samuel | Celstream Technologies | www.celstream.com

 

 


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. 
_______________=
_______________________________________________________________
 DISCLAIMER: This electronic message and any attachments to this electronic
 message is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) named herein
 and may contain legally privileged and confidential information. It is the=
=20
 property of Celstream Technologies Pvt Limited. If you are not the intended
 recipient, you are hereby strictly notified not to copy, forward, distribu=
te
 or use this message or any attachments thereto. If you have received this
 message in error, please delete it and all copies thereof, from your system
 and notify the sender at Celstream Technologies or=20
 administrator@celstream.com immediately.
___________________________________________________________________________=
___
------_=_NextPart_001_01CC0A95.87B806ED-- --===============1421132044== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp --===============1421132044==-- From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Wed May 4 13:29:22 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05A5AE06DE for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 13:29:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.597 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_MOSTLY=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JdSaofNm8e+2 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 13:29:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B1B5E067F for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 13:29:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C49D7966E; Wed, 4 May 2011 16:18:29 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from mail-out.apple.com (bramley.apple.com [17.151.62.49]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3648079520 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 16:17:11 -0400 (EDT) MIME-version: 1.0 Received: from relay13.apple.com ([17.128.113.29]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPS id <0LKO00KIHTHTNHZ0@mail-out.apple.com> for ipp@pwg.org; Wed, 04 May 2011 13:17:11 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 1180711d-b7c70ae00000719a-6d-4dc1b4461b6c Received: from msweet.apple.com (msweet.apple.com [17.197.41.43]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay13.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id F7.D7.29082.644B1CD4; Wed, 04 May 2011 13:17:10 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [IPP] Question on PWG draft specification mismatch & parsing From: Michael Sweet In-reply-to: Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 13:17:10 -0700 Message-id: <2D34D7E9-CCF5-4BFF-A6D9-CB5CF8EA4DFC@apple.com> References: To: "Petrie, Glen" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1222) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: ipp@pwg.org X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0768079832==" Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 5C49D7966E.A9502 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org --===============0768079832== Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_DxFsrRkttRlp6eNL1VQYCA)" --Boundary_(ID_DxFsrRkttRlp6eNL1VQYCA) Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable It should be 8-bits per pixel. I'm working on regenerating the files... On May 4, 2011, at 12:57 PM, Petrie, Glen wrote: > I was looking some of the PWGR images you provided. I expected the sgray= -8 to have 8 bits/color and 8 bits/pixel but the file shows 24 bits/pixel. = Which is correct? >=20=20 > Glen >=20=20 >=20=20 > From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org [mailto:ipp-bounces@pwg.org] On Behalf Of Roy S= amuel > Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 9:47 PM > To: ipp@pwg.org; Michael Sweet > Subject: [IPP] Question on PWG draft specification mismatch & parsing >=20=20 > Hi Michael, >=20=20 > I had downloaded the sample PWGRaster files from:http://ftp.easysw.com/pu= b/cups/examples/PWGRasterSamples.zip, with your latest working draft of the= PWG raster found at: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippraster10-20110= 327-rev.pdf. I compared the raster files in the folders: > PWGRasterSamples\srgb-16 & > PWGRasterSamples\srgb-8, with the specs given in the draft document. >=20=20 > I found that neither of the directories contained files that adhered to t= he draft document w.r.t parsing the header. Specifically for the value of = =91NumColors=92. >=20=20 > --1-- > According to the draft document, bytes 420-423 need to contain =91NumColo= rs=92 value, however, I found them to be zero. Are the sample files outdate= d?? >=20=20 > --2-- > Based on the decode algorithm given in the draft document, I had tried to= obtain plain RGB raster data from a pwg-raster file. I had converted the P= DF document obtained here:http://orenyomtov.com/downloads/testpage.pdf to o= btain pwg-raster file using Google cloud print. I am able to get the pwg-ra= ster file from GCP successfully. However, on converting the pwg-raster file= to RGB data, I have been successful in decoding around 1/6th or so, to ra= ster data successfully, i.e. the top part of the page is being rendered suc= cessfully, while the rest is not rendered. > (I use GIMP to open the output raster file in RAW mode). > I have attached a screenshot of the output file that I=92m able to view t= hrough GIMP (scaled down version). >=20=20 > Is my algorithm wrong? Or are the specs incorrect? >=20=20 > Regards. > _________________________________________________ > Roy Samuel | Celstream Technologies | www.celstream.com >=20=20 >=20=20 >=20 > --=20 > This message has been scanned for viruses and=20 > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is=20 > believed to be clean. > _________________________________________________________________________= _____ > DISCLAIMER: This electronic message and any attachments to this electron= ic > message is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) named here= in > and may contain legally privileged and confidential information. It is t= he=20 > property of Celstream Technologies Pvt Limited. If you are not the inten= ded > recipient, you are hereby strictly notified not to copy, forward, distri= bute > or use this message or any attachments thereto. If you have received this > message in error, please delete it and all copies thereof, from your sys= tem > and notify the sender at Celstream Technologies or=20 > administrator@celstream.com immediately. > _________________________________________________________________________= _____ ________________________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --Boundary_(ID_DxFsrRkttRlp6eNL1VQYCA) Content-type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
I was looking some of the= PWGR images you provided.  I expected the sgray-8 to have 8 bits/colo= r and 8 bits/pixel but the file shows 24 bits/pixel.  Which is correct= ?
 
Glen
 
 
<= span style=3D"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; ">
=
From:=  ipp-bounces@pwg.org [mailto:ipp-bounces@pwg.org]<= span class=3D"Apple-converted-space"> On Behalf Of Roy Samuel
Sent: Thursday, April 2= 8, 2011 9:47 PM
To: ipp@pwg.org; Mi= chael Sweet
Subject: [IPP] Question on PWG draf= t specification mismatch & parsing
 
Hi Michael,
 
= I had downloaded the sample PWGRaster files from:http://ftp.easysw.com/pub/cups/examples/PWGRasterSa= mples.zip, with your latest working draft of the PWG raster found at: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippraster10= -20110327-rev.pdf. I compared the raster files in the folders:
P= WGRasterSamples\srgb-16  &
PWGRasterSamples\srgb-8, with th= e specs given in the draft document.
 =
I found that neit= her of the directories contained files that adhered to the draft document w= .r.t parsing the header. Specifically for the value of =91NumColors=92.
 
--1--
According to the draft document, bytes 420-4= 23 need to contain =91NumColors=92 value, however, I found them to be zero.= Are the sample files outdated??
 
--2--<= /span>
Base= d on the decode algorithm given in the draft document, I had tried to obtai= n plain RGB raster data from a pwg-raster file. I had converted the PDF doc= ument obtained here:http://orenyomtov.com= /downloads/testpage.pdf to obtain pwg-raster file using Google cloud print. I am able to get the= pwg-raster file from GCP successfully. However, on converting the pwg-rast= er file to RGB data,  I have been successful in decoding around 1/6th or so, to rast= er data successfully, i.e. the top part of the page is being rendered succe= ssfully, while the rest is not rendered.
(I use GIMP to open the out= put raster file in RAW mode).
I have attached a screenshot of the ou= tput file that I=92m able to view through GIMP (scaled down version).<= /o:p>
Is my algorithm wrong? Or are the specs incorrect?
<= o:p> 
Regards.
_________________________________________________<= /span>
Roy Sam= uel | Celstream Technologies | <= /span><= span style=3D"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: blue; font-weight= : bold; ">www.celstream.com=
 
 

-- 
This message has been scanned for = viruses and 
dangerous= content by MailScanner, and= is 
believed to be cl= ean.
______________________________________=
________________________________________
 DISCLAIMER: This electronic message and any attachments to this electronic
 message is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) named herein
 and may contain legally privileged and confidential information. It is the=
=20
 property of Celstream Technologies Pvt Limited. If you are not the intended
 recipient, you are hereby strictly notified not to copy, forward, distribu=
te
 or use this message or any attachments thereto. If you have received this
 message in error, please delete it and all copies thereof, from your system
 and notify the sender at Celstream Technologies or=20
 administrator@celstream.com immediately.
___________________________________________________________________________=
___
<= br>
_______________________________________________________________= _________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Cha= ir






--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --Boundary_(ID_DxFsrRkttRlp6eNL1VQYCA)-- --===============0768079832== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp --===============0768079832==-- From pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Wed May 4 14:15:49 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F935E06C3 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 14:15:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wj0OevjfWJwd for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 14:15:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63ABCE07AA for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 14:15:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC74795B4; Wed, 4 May 2011 17:15:21 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Delivered-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Received: from mail-out.apple.com (mail-out.apple.com [17.151.62.49]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5089B7958E for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 17:13:52 -0400 (EDT) MIME-version: 1.0 Received: from relay11.apple.com ([17.128.113.48]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPS id <0LKO00KCQW58NH11@mail-out.apple.com> for pwg-announce@pwg.org; Wed, 04 May 2011 14:13:52 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807130-b7c15ae000005aca-76-4dc1c190f900 Received: from msweet.apple.com (msweet.apple.com [17.197.41.43]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay11.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 7A.99.23242.091C1CD4; Wed, 04 May 2011 14:13:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Michael Sweet Date: Wed, 04 May 2011 14:13:52 -0700 To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Message-id: <32AB2E94-CF3E-4D2F-A1A0-4A1B521C6371@apple.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1222) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Subject: [Pwg-Announce] REMINDER: **4 DAY** PWG May 2011 Face-to-Face Meeting in Webster, NY X-BeenThere: pwg-announce@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Printer Working Group Announcement List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1838803871==" Sender: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 0AC74795B4.ABB4F X-pwg-MailScanner-From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org --===============1838803871== Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_BiJ7yBmuGbiEhv+/czP6Lw)" --Boundary_(ID_BiJ7yBmuGbiEhv+/czP6Lw) Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT [This is a REMINDER for all of you that haven't yet gone to the survey page...] All, The May 2011 PWG face-to-face meeting page is now available. The agenda and venue information can be found at: http://www.pwg.org/chair/meeting-info/may_2011_webster.html NOTE: This meeting is 4 days long to accommodate the amount of material we have to discuss. This page will be updated with document links as the material becomes available. Please visit the February 2011 survey page and indicate whether you plan to participate in person or call in: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/T3H2YTC For those not able to attend in person, the usual telephone bridge number will be provided. The details of the conference call are: Call-in toll-free number (US/Canada): +1 866 469-3239 Call-in toll number (US/Canada): +1 650 429-3300 Call-in toll number (US/Canada): +1 408 856-9570 Attendee access code: Please request from the PWG Chair (msweet@apple.com) if you need it. ________________________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --Boundary_(ID_BiJ7yBmuGbiEhv+/czP6Lw) Content-type: text/html; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
[This is a REMINDER f= or all of you that haven't yet gone to the survey page...]

All,

The May 2011 PWG face-to-face meetin= g page is now available. The agenda and venue information can be found at:<= /div>


NOTE: This meeting is 4 days long to accommodate = the amount of material we have to discuss.

This pa= ge will be updated with document links as the material becomes available.

Please visit the February 2011 survey page and indi= cate whether you plan to participate in person or call in:

<= a href=3D"http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/T3H2YTC">http://www.surveymonkey.co= m/s/T3H2YTC

For those not able to attend = in person, the usual telephone bridge number will be provided. Th= e details of the conference call are:

Call-in toll-free n= umber (US/Canada): +1 866 469-3239
Call-in toll number (US/Canada): +1 6= 50 429-3300
Call-in toll number (US/Canada): +1 408 856-9570

Attendee access code: Please request from the PWG Chair (msweet@apple.com) if you need it.
<= br>
_______________________________________________________________= _________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Cha= ir






--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --Boundary_(ID_BiJ7yBmuGbiEhv+/czP6Lw)-- --===============1838803871== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pwg-announce mailing list pwg-announce@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/pwg-announce --===============1838803871==-- From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Wed May 4 21:43:34 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E311E06AC for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 21:43:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_MOSTLY=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q47MAeTbXdcC for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 21:43:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76040E0618 for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 21:43:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15359795BF; Thu, 5 May 2011 00:43:03 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from mail.celstream.com (mail.celstream.com [164.164.95.11]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F8A795BE for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 00:42:36 -0400 (EDT) X-TM-IMSS-Message-ID: <050445120000bc28@celstream.com> Received: from cel-bang-dlp.celstream-in.com ([127.0.0.1]) by cel-bangt-m02.celstream-in.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 5 May 2011 10:12:19 +0530 Received: from CEL-BANGT-M01.celstream-in.com ([10.255.10.109]) by cel-bang-dlp.celstream-in.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 5 May 2011 10:12:19 +0530 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 10:12:19 +0530 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <218EADC7-860F-40EC-95C7-FE29BA49896F@apple.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Question on PWG draft specification mismatch & parsing thread-index: AcwHl0JzVE9WVL/fR/O9bCqLO6fyCADQVFyA References: <218EADC7-860F-40EC-95C7-FE29BA49896F@apple.com> From: "Roy Samuel" To: "Michael Sweet" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 May 2011 04:42:19.0564 (UTC) FILETIME=[D13216C0:01CC0ADE] X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1433-6.5.0.1024-18116.004 X-TM-AS-Result: No--29.924-5.0-31-10 X-imss-scan-details: No--29.924-5.0-31-10 X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: No X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No X-TM-AS-Result-Xfilter: Match text exemption rules:No X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: ipp@pwg.org Subject: [IPP] RE: Question on PWG draft specification mismatch & parsing X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0002886331==" Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 15359795BF.AA1B3 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============0002886331== Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CC0ADE.D0E97E5D" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CC0ADE.D0E97E5D Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Michael, =20 Thanks for your reply.=20 I have been able to parse the PWG-raster file successfully to obtain plain RGB data - but only from the one, present in the directory "PWGRasterSamples" obtained from : http://ftp.easysw.com/pub/cups/examples/PWGRasterSamples.zip The specific PWG raster file used is : "img_6461.jpg-srgb-8-150dpi.pwg" I was able to write the parser based on the specifications described in the PWG draft document. =20 =20 I tried using "Rasterview" from http://www.easysw.com/~mike/rasterview/ running on Ubuntu 10.10, to open the file mentioned above, "img_6461.jpg-srgb-8-150dpi.pwg". I received an error, "Unable to read page data: Resource temporarily unavailable" Using the tools/maketestfiles.sh, I was able to create a raster file with magic number, "3SaR" and not "RaS2", which I don't think is a PWG raster (?). I used the pstoraster filter. This generated file opens fine with RasterView v1.2.1. , FYI. =20 I was able to "/fetch" a pwg raster file from Google Cloud Print (GCP), by creating a print job from a pdf file. (location of pdf file: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippraster10-20110327-rev.pdf). I was not able to open this PWG raster file, with RasterView, nor was I able to parse this file completely using the parser that was developed based on PWG draft specifications. (I was able to obtain about 1/6th of the file converted to RGB data successfully, the rest - was not decoded, and appeared as '0x00' for the remainder of the raster data.) =20 Are there different versions of the PWG raster file? Perhaps GCP is not using the latest PWG specifications?=20 Is RasterView not updated to parse the latest PWG files? =20 Regards, Roy Samuel. =20 From: Michael Sweet [mailto:msweet@apple.com]=20 Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2011 6:02 AM To: Roy Samuel Cc: ipp@pwg.org Subject: Re: Question on PWG draft specification mismatch & parsing =20 On Apr 28, 2011, at 9:46 PM, Roy Samuel wrote: ... I found that neither of the directories contained files that adhered to the draft document w.r.t parsing the header. Specifically for the value of 'NumColors'. =09=20 --1-- According to the draft document, bytes 420-423 need to contain 'NumColors' value, however, I found them to be zero. Are the sample files outdated?? =20 Not exactly outdated, just the code that generated them (and the page headers) contains an error. I will post updates next week. =20 --2-- ... (I use GIMP to open the output raster file in RAW mode). I have attached a screenshot of the output file that I'm able to view through GIMP (scaled down version). =09=20 Is my algorithm wrong? Or are the specs incorrect? =20 I would suspect the former since the compression code that generated the files has been in use for many years now. =20 Another tool you can use is RasterView, available here (with source): =20 http://www.easysw.com/~mike/rasterview/ =20 __________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair =20 ___________________________________________________________________________= ___ DISCLAIMER: This electronic message and any attachments to this electronic message is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and confidential information. It is the= =20 property of Celstream Technologies Pvt Limited. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby strictly notified not to copy, forward, distribu= te or use this message or any attachments thereto. If you have received this message in error, please delete it and all copies thereof, from your system and notify the sender at Celstream Technologies or=20 administrator@celstream.com immediately. ___________________________________________________________________________= ___ --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CC0ADE.D0E97E5D Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Michae= l,

 

Thanks for your reply. <= /p>

I have been able to parse the PWG-raster fil= e successfully to obtain plain RGB data – but only from the one, pres= ent in the directory “PWGRasterSamples” obtained from : http://ft= p.easysw.com/pub/cups/examples/PWGRasterSamples.zip

The specific PWG raster file used is : “= ;img_6461.jpg-srgb-8-150dpi.pwg”

I was able to write the parser based on the specifications des= cribed in the PWG draft document.

 

 =

I tried using “Rastervie= w” from ht= tp://www.easysw.com/~mike/rasterview/ running on Ubuntu 10.10, t= o open the file mentioned above, “img_6461.jpg-srgb-8-150dpi.pwg̶= 1;. I received an error, “Unable to read page data: Resource temporar= ily unavailable”

Usi= ng the tools/maketestfiles.sh, I was able to create a raster file with magi= c number, “3SaR” and not “RaS2”, which I don’= t think is a PWG raster (?). I used the pstoraster filter. This generated f= ile opens fine with RasterView v1.2.1. , FYI.

 

I was able to “/fetch” a pwg raster file from Google Cloud Pri= nt (GCP), by creating a print job from a pdf file. (location of pdf file: <= /span><= a href=3D"ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippraster10-20110327-rev.pdf"= >ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippraster10-20110327-rev.pdf). I was not able to open this PWG raster file, with RasterView, no= r was I able to parse this file completely using the parser that was develo= ped based on PWG draft specifications. (I was able to obtain about 1/6th of= the file converted to RGB data successfully, the rest – was not deco= ded, and appeared as ‘0x00’ for the remainder of the raster dat= a.)

 

Are there different versions of the PWG raster file?

Perhaps GCP is not using the= latest PWG specifications?

Is RasterView not updated to parse the latest PWG files?

 

Regards,

Ro= y Samuel.

 

From: Michael Sweet [ma= ilto:msweet@apple.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2011 6:02 AM
= To: Roy Samuel
Cc: ipp@pwg.org
Subject: Re: Questio= n on PWG draft specification mismatch & parsing

 

On Apr 28, 2011, at 9:46 PM, Roy Samuel wrote:

=

...

<= blockquote style=3D'margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'>

I found that neither of the directories contain= ed files that adhered to the draft document w.r.t parsing the header. Speci= fically for the value of ‘NumColors’.

 

--1--

According to the draft document, bytes 420-423 need to = contain ‘NumColors’ value, however, I found them to be zero. Ar= e the sample files outdated??

 

= Not exactly outdated, just the code that generated them (and the page heade= rs) contains an error. I will post updates next week.

<= div>

 <= /o:p>

--2--

...

(I use GIMP to open the output raster = file in RAW mode).<= /span>

I have attached a screenshot of the outpu= t file that I’m able to view through GIMP (scaled down version).=

 

Is my algorithm wrong? Or are the specs incorrect?=

&n= bsp;

I would suspect the former since t= he compression code that generated the files has been in use for many years= now.

 

Another tool you can use is RasterView, avail= able here (with source):

 

 

______________________________= ____________________

<= span style=3D'font-size:13.5pt;font-family:"Helvetica","sans-serif";color:b= lack'>Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair

 

=

--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. 
_______________=
_______________________________________________________________
 DISCLAIMER: This electronic message and any attachments to this electronic
 message is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) named herein
 and may contain legally privileged and confidential information. It is the=
=20
 property of Celstream Technologies Pvt Limited. If you are not the intended
 recipient, you are hereby strictly notified not to copy, forward, distribu=
te
 or use this message or any attachments thereto. If you have received this
 message in error, please delete it and all copies thereof, from your system
 and notify the sender at Celstream Technologies or=20
 administrator@celstream.com immediately.
___________________________________________________________________________=
___
------_=_NextPart_001_01CC0ADE.D0E97E5D-- --===============0002886331== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp --===============0002886331==-- From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Thu May 5 08:00:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77935E0694 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 08:00:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cULkIpERqPl3 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 08:00:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590DBE0593 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 08:00:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0D6B795C9; Thu, 5 May 2011 11:00:17 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from mail-out.apple.com (crispin.apple.com [17.151.62.50]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3D5E795C8 for ; Thu, 5 May 2011 11:00:03 -0400 (EDT) MIME-version: 1.0 Received: from relay14.apple.com ([17.128.113.52]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPS id <0LKQ0056W9KSJ8U0@mail-out.apple.com> for ipp@pwg.org; Thu, 05 May 2011 08:00:03 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807134-b7c00ae0000074fb-bd-4dc2bb712e75 Received: from [17.151.74.218] (Unknown_Domain [17.151.74.218]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay14.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 17.A0.29947.27BB2CD4; Thu, 05 May 2011 08:00:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Michael Sweet In-reply-to: Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 08:00:03 -0700 Message-id: References: <218EADC7-860F-40EC-95C7-FE29BA49896F@apple.com> To: Roy Samuel X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: ipp@pwg.org Subject: [IPP] Re: Question on PWG draft specification mismatch & parsing X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1491593556==" Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: E0D6B795C9.A995E X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org --===============1491593556== Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_ftU26exKoH0B5ioU4tWo8Q)" --Boundary_(ID_ftU26exKoH0B5ioU4tWo8Q) Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Roy, I'll look into the issues with RasterView - it is possible I need to update= the binaries (they haven't been updated in 4 years) and Ubuntu may not hav= e updated their CUPS with the latest raster fixes, either... More comments inline... On May 4, 2011, at 9:42 PM, Roy Samuel wrote: > ... > Using the tools/maketestfiles.sh, I was able to create a raster file with= magic number, =933SaR=94 and not =93RaS2=94, which I don=92t think is a PW= G raster (?). I used the pstoraster filter. This generated file opens fine = with RasterView v1.2.1. , FYI. "3SaR" is a version 3 CUPS Raster file in little-endian byte order. The "ma= ketestfiles.sh" script doesn't have support for generating version 2 CUPS R= aster files in big-endian byte order, as that requires support in Ghostscri= pt (patch to be submitted Real Soon Now), cgpdftoraster, or the rastertopwg= filter from CUPS 1.5. I'll see about adding support for that. > I was able to =93/fetch=94 a pwg raster file from Google Cloud Print (GCP= ), by creating a print job from a pdf file. (location of pdf file:ftp://ftp= .pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippraster10-20110327-rev.pdf). I was not able to= open this PWG raster file, with RasterView, nor was I able to parse this f= ile completely using the parser that was developed based on PWG draft speci= fications. (I was able to obtain about 1/6th of the file converted to RGB d= ata successfully, the rest =96 was not decoded, and appeared as =910x00=92 = for the remainder of the raster data.) Again, it could be that RasterView needs to be re-built for the latest Ubun= tu, perhaps using the latest CUPS raster sources (instead of relying on the= system-supplied CUPS). =20 >=20 > Are there different versions of the PWG raster file? No, although what shows up in the page header has been changing as we conti= nue to define/refine the subset. > Perhaps GCP is not using the latest PWG specifications? I can't say - Google would be the one to ask specifically about this, but l= ast time I checked it was working properly (I will see about doing some reg= ular testing with them...) ________________________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --Boundary_(ID_ftU26exKoH0B5ioU4tWo8Q) Content-type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable = Roy,

I'll look into the issues with RasterView - it is p= ossible I need to update the binaries (they haven't been updated in 4 years= ) and Ubuntu may not have updated their CUPS with the latest raster fixes, = either...

More comments inline...

On May 4, 2011, at 9:42 PM, Roy Samuel wrote:
= ...
<= span class=3D"Apple-style-span" style=3D"border-collapse: separate; font-fa= mily: Helvetica; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: nor= mal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: = 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0p= x; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing:= 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: a= uto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: medium; ">
Using the t= ools/maketestfiles.sh, I was able to create a raster file with magic number= , =933SaR=94 and not =93RaS2=94, which I don=92t think is a PWG raster (?).= I used the pstoraster filter. This generated file opens fine with RasterVi= ew v1.2.1. , FYI.
<= /span>

"3SaR" is a version 3 CUPS Raster file in= little-endian byte order. The "maketestfiles.sh" script doesn't have suppo= rt for generating version 2 CUPS Raster files in big-endian byte order, as = that requires support in Ghostscript (patch to be submitted Real Soon Now),= cgpdftoraster, or the rastertopwg filter from CUPS 1.5.

I'll see about adding support for that.

I was able to =93/fetch= =94 a pwg raster file from Google Cloud Print (GCP), by creating a print jo= b from a pdf file. (location of pdf file:ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippraster10-2011032= 7-rev.pdf). I was not able to open this P= WG raster file, with RasterView, nor was I able to parse this file complete= ly using the parser that was developed based on PWG draft specifications. (= I was able to obtain about 1/6th of the file converted to RGB data successf= ully, the rest =96 was not decoded, and appeared as =910x00=92 for the rema= inder of the raster data.)

Again, it could be that RasterView needs to be re-built for the = latest Ubuntu, perhaps using the latest CUPS raster sources (instead of rel= ying on the system-supplied CUPS).
 
Are the= re different versions of the PWG raster file?

No, although what shows up in the page header= has been changing as we continue to define/refine the subset.
Perhaps GCP is not using the latest PWG= specifications?

I can't say - Google would be the one to ask specifically about this, but = last time I checked it was working properly (I will see about doing some re= gular testing with them...)

_______________________________________________= _________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer= , PWG Chair


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --Boundary_(ID_ftU26exKoH0B5ioU4tWo8Q)-- --===============1491593556== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp --===============1491593556==-- From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Mon May 9 04:02:50 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66412E071F for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 04:02:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GKQghT792CHw for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 04:02:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C91E06D3 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 04:02:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B23E779510; Mon, 9 May 2011 07:02:20 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: IPP@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from USA7109MR003.ACS-INC.COM (usa7109mr003.acs-inc.com [63.101.151.12]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FB417950A for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 07:02:04 -0400 (EDT) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkcBAATJx00Nh9IPmWdsb2JhbACCY5UtjWwUAQEBAQEICwsHFCXFSYMmgmYEhkCNVopM X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,340,1301893200"; d="scan'208,217";a="39086551" Received: from usa0300gw002.na.xerox.net ([13.135.210.15]) by USA7109MR003.ACS-INC.COM with ESMTP; 09 May 2011 06:01:55 -0500 Received: from USA7061MS04.na.xerox.net ([13.151.235.15]) by USA0300GW002.na.xerox.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 9 May 2011 07:01:43 -0400 x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 04:01:42 -0700 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Comment on JPS3 Thread-Index: AcwNblzCUZwKFW1eSuqU3moUBN5f/w== From: "Zehler, Peter" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 May 2011 11:01:43.0717 (UTC) FILETIME=[7B572D50:01CC0E38] X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: Subject: [IPP] Comment on JPS3 X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1391353727==" Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: B23E779510.A8CB8 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============1391353727== Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CC0E38.7AA73AC8" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CC0E38.7AA73AC8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All, I do not see why printer-mandatory-job-attributes is needed. (It doesn't even make sense to me.) I was under the impression that all the attributes required to be supplied by the client in order to create a job in IPP are mandatory. Any remaining attributes are taken from printer defaults or supplied by the system. What did I miss? Pete =20 =20 Peter Zehler Xerox Research Center Webster Email: Peter.Zehler@Xerox.com =20 Voice: (585) 265-8755 FAX: (585) 265-7441 US Mail: Peter Zehler Xerox Corp. 800 Phillips Rd. M/S 128-25E Webster NY, 14580-9701=20 =20 --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CC0E38.7AA73AC8 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

All,<= /p>

I do not see why printer-mandatory-job-attributes i= s needed.  (It doesn’t even make sense to me.)  I was under= the impression that all the attributes required to be supplied by the clie= nt in order to create a job in IPP are mandatory.  Any remaining attri= butes are taken from printer defaults or supplied by the system.  What= did I miss?

Pete

 

 

Peter Zehler

Xerox Research Center Webster
Email: Peter.Zehler@Xerox.com=
Voice: (585) 265-8755
= FAX: (585) 265-7441
US Mail: Peter Zehler
X= erox Corp.
800 Phillips Rd= .
M/S 128-25E
Webster NY, 14580-9701

 


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CC0E38.7AA73AC8-- --===============1391353727== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp --===============1391353727==-- From pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Mon May 9 04:02:56 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 295E5E071F for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 04:02:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Eav+qvCv1LLC for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 04:02:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12A86E06D3 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 04:02:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AC757951B; Mon, 9 May 2011 07:02:21 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Delivered-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Received: from USA7109MR003.ACS-INC.COM (usa7109mr003.acs-inc.com [63.101.151.12]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDF1979510 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 07:02:04 -0400 (EDT) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtcAAATJx00Nh9IPmWdsb2JhbACCY6MZFAEBAQEBCAsLBxQlxUmDJoJmBIIphBeNVopM X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,340,1301893200"; d="scan'208,217";a="39086570" Received: from usa0300gw002.na.xerox.net ([13.135.210.15]) by USA7109MR003.ACS-INC.COM with ESMTP; 09 May 2011 06:01:58 -0500 Received: from USA7061MS04.na.xerox.net ([13.151.235.15]) by USA0300GW002.na.xerox.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 9 May 2011 07:01:45 -0400 x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 03:57:56 -0700 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: PWG Last Call of PWG FaxOut Service Semantic Model and Service Interface specification (5/9/11 - 5/6/11) Thread-Index: AcwON/PeezmexiBjQe6Rybr6qBtaVw== From: "Zehler, Peter" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 May 2011 11:01:45.0811 (UTC) FILETIME=[7C96B230:01CC0E38] X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Subject: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last Call of PWG FaxOut Service Semantic Model and Service Interface specification (5/9/11 - 5/6/11) X-BeenThere: pwg-announce@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Printer Working Group Announcement List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0010104469==" Sender: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 5AC757951B.AD44D X-pwg-MailScanner-From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============0010104469== Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CC0E38.7BE9183E" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CC0E38.7BE9183E Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All, =20 [This PWG Last Call will start today on Monday May 9, 2011. This PWG Last Call will end Friday June 6, 2011 at 10pm US PDT.] =20 This is the formal announcement of the PWG FaxOut Service Semantic Model and Service Interface specification, which is located at: =20 =20 Many of the operations and attributes defined in this document have been prototyped by Xerox. The prototype is based on existing protocols such as ISO 10175, IETF/PWG IPP and Microsoft WSD. The MFD WG has completed a working group last call and subsequent revisions of this document. =20 The PWG Process/3.0 requires that a quorum (30%) of PWG voting members must acknowledge a PWG Last Call (with or without comments), before any document can progress to PWG Formal Vote. This PWG Last Call is NOT a Formal Vote but it DOES require your review acknowledgment. =20 Please send your review acknowledgment *exactly* as follows: =20 To: mfd at pwg.org =20 Subject: has reviewed the FaxOut Service Semantic Model and Service Interface specification and has [no] comments =20 Please do NOT simply reply to this note on the PWG-Announce list. =20 This specification in normatively dependent on the MFD Model and Common Semantics specification. As a result this specification is less than 40 pages and consists primarily of figures, tables, and simplified text that references the MFD Model and Common Semantics specification that contains the details. I have also posted a "-rev" version of this specification for those of you that would like to see what has changed since the MFD group Last Call. =20 Note: The PWG Definition of the Standards Development Process Version 3.0 is located at: =20 =20 =20 =20 Peter Zehler Xerox Research Center Webster Email: Peter.Zehler@Xerox.com Voice: (585) 265-8755 FAX: (585) 265-7441 US Mail: Peter Zehler Xerox Corp. 800 Phillips Rd. M/S 128-25E Webster NY, 14580-9701=20 =20 --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and=20 dangerous content by MailScanner , and is believed to be clean.=20 --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and=20 dangerous content by MailScanner , and is believed to be clean.=20 --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CC0E38.7BE9183E Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 
All,
 
[This PWG Last Call will start today on Mo=
nday May 9, 2011.
This PWG Last Call will end Friday June 6, 2011 at 10pm U=
S PDT.]
 
This is the formal announcement of the PWG FaxOut Service Semantic Model and Service Interfa=
ce specification, which is located at:
<ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/mfd/wd=
/wd-mfdfaxoutmodel10-20110503.pdf> 
 
Many of the operations and attributes defined in this docum=
ent have been prototyped by Xerox.  The prototype is based on existing=
 protocols such as ISO 10175, IETF/PWG IPP and Microsoft WSD.  The MFD=
 WG has completed a working group last call and subsequent revisions of thi=
s document.
 
The PWG Process/3.0 requires that a quorum (30%) of =
PWG voting members must acknowledge a PWG Last Call (with or without commen=
ts), before any document can progress to PWG Formal Vote.  This PWG La=
st Call is NOT a Formal Vote but it DOES require your review acknowledgment=
.
 
Please send your review acknowledgment *exactly* as follows:
 
To:  mfd at pwg.org<=
/o:p>
Sub=
ject:  <Company Name> has reviewed the FaxOut Service Semantic Model and Service I=
nterface specification and has [no] comments
 
Please do NOT simply reply to this no=
te on the PWG-Announce list.
 
This specification in normatively d=
ependent on the MFD Model and Common Semantics specification.  As a re=
sult this specification is less than 40 pages and consists primarily of fig=
ures, tables, and simplified text that references the MFD Model and Common =
Semantics specification that contains the details.  I have also posted=
 a “-rev” version of this specification for those of you that w=
ould like to see what has changed since the MFD group Last Call.=

&nb=
sp;
Note:  The PWG Definition of the Standards Development Process Versio=
n 3.0 is located at:
  <http://www.pwg.org/chair/membership_docs/pwg-=
process30.pdf>
 

=  

 

 

P= eter Zehler

Xerox Re= search Center Webster
Email: Peter.Zehler@Xerox.com
= Voice: (585) 265-8755
FAX: (585) 265-7441
U= S Mail: Peter Zehler
Xerox= Corp.
800 Phillips Rd.
M/S 128-25E
Webster NY, 14580-9701

 


--
This message has been= scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


--
This message has been scann= ed for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CC0E38.7BE9183E-- --===============0010104469== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pwg-announce mailing list pwg-announce@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/pwg-announce --===============0010104469==-- From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Mon May 9 08:37:36 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB54E07E8 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 08:37:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pYrkRelhpmdS for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 08:37:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FFACE07CC for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 08:37:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 027EB7952C; Mon, 9 May 2011 11:37:18 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: IPP@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from mail-out.apple.com (mail-out.apple.com [17.151.62.49]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 994E779522 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 11:37:04 -0400 (EDT) MIME-version: 1.0 Received: from relay16.apple.com ([17.128.113.55]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTP id <0LKX009FZPZH3F30@mail-out.apple.com> for IPP@pwg.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 08:37:03 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807137-b7cd4ae000003108-36-4dc80a1a99b0 Received: from [17.153.19.233] (Unknown_Domain [17.153.19.233]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay16.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 61.7C.12552.C1A08CD4; Mon, 09 May 2011 08:37:03 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [IPP] Comment on JPS3 From: Michael Sweet In-reply-to: Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 08:36:57 -0700 Message-id: <9ECD73B7-D92B-43DA-ADB4-CE559086E290@apple.com> References: To: "Zehler, Peter" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: IPP@pwg.org X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0009025721==" Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 027EB7952C.A99A6 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org --===============0009025721== Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_8cdV3IwBgbv5kRAO9kuODQ)" --Boundary_(ID_8cdV3IwBgbv5kRAO9kuODQ) Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable On May 9, 2011, at 4:01 AM, Zehler, Peter wrote: > All, > I do not see why printer-mandatory-job-attributes is needed. (It doesn= =92t even make sense to me.) I was under the impression that all the attri= butes required to be supplied by the client in order to create a job in IPP= are mandatory. Any remaining attributes are taken from printer defaults o= r supplied by the system. What did I miss? The reasoning was that we needed an attribute to tell the client which attr= ibutes were required for a successful print job, particularly for attribute= s *without* default values (e.g. job-accounting-user-id, etc.) that might b= e used for the paid print scenario. ________________________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --Boundary_(ID_8cdV3IwBgbv5kRAO9kuODQ) Content-type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
All,
I do not see why printer-m= andatory-job-attributes is needed.  (It doesn=92t even make sense to m= e.)  I was under the impression that all the attributes required to be= supplied by the client in order to create a job in IPP are mandatory. = ; Any remaining attributes are taken from printer defaults or supplied by t= he system.  What did I miss?

The reasoning was that we needed an attribute to tell= the client which attributes were required for a successful print job, part= icularly for attributes *without* default values (e.g. job-accounting-user-= id, etc.) that might be used for the paid print scenario.

_______________________________________________= _________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer= , PWG Chair


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --Boundary_(ID_8cdV3IwBgbv5kRAO9kuODQ)-- --===============0009025721== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp --===============0009025721==-- From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Mon May 9 17:17:55 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1DFFE0778 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 17:17:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2TkfetsHiSWs for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 17:17:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC21E065D for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 17:17:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0777279606; Mon, 9 May 2011 20:17:41 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com (mail-fx0-f46.google.com [209.85.161.46]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13B6D79513 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 20:17:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so5387922fxm.5 for ; Mon, 09 May 2011 17:17:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=O0Rz4wDGh0wVG89xDsmN+Xoeo/Ey+Kznn1zF5GUqeb0=; b=ZCG0woQ0TVdjWzmpnB0vip7jJeQB2zUGV6U1rQNa95Jm66qoj1p5qJl+47NqSieT8B fDbGbCZEl7SRlfstPnxW0oDU6dPetYNo/LXD7BMEq8paRcWVC97ZbLylutoNt/MOmNQa Pn5Qk60HdiRqMyKoLlO9QOINmgZVUfNNhv3QQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=nGG0ZbRbo53fMDHlUeCyVkFI070KeY72+H+66ETFHTeq7i2/WgGRYNJY2eRcUFVxHa xiYGYR6nyNsUy1xW0tI1mtJNQ2hQAJOyrNR0gC6FoKr3f/vK7BLUddPnRZv5jeTcfKPX CP1vCLC0mW5/7z5/dceILs6cVDJtBaOJPuDb4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.144.144 with SMTP id z16mr1107511fau.24.1304986646045; Mon, 09 May 2011 17:17:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.37.19 with HTTP; Mon, 9 May 2011 17:17:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 20:17:26 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [IPP] IPP over USB From: Ira McDonald To: "Mitchell, Andrew (Solutions Architect)" , Ira McDonald X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: "ipp@pwg.org" X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1315797581==" Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 0777279606.A975E X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org --===============1315797581== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0022158c0b5179650104a2e0e1ed --0022158c0b5179650104a2e0e1ed Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Andrew, Samsung is a member of the USB IF (I checked). I have reviewed the specification and would like to have Samsung listed on the NWI. Cheers, - Ira (Consulting Architect in Samsung Advanced Printing Systems Lab) Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect) Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG Co-Chair - TCG Hardcopy WG IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB Blue Roof Music/High North Inc http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com Christmas through April: 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176 734-944-0094 May to Christmas: PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 906-494-2434 On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 8:06 PM, Mitchell, Andrew (Solutions Architect) < andrew.mitchell2@hp.com> wrote: > All, > > I've uploaded an updated IPP over USB to the white paper directory here: > > > ftp://ftp.pwg.org//pub/pwg/ipp/whitepaper/draft-ippusbspecification-20110428.pdf > > This is most likely the last draft prior to the F2F, and the last draft > prior to submission to the USB IF, although we can go through this document > at the F2F. I am currently filling out the NWI (New Work Initiative) > Application Form for submission to the USB IF. I believe we have the 5 USB > IF members needed to submit the NWI, but I would like to get as many of the > PWG members who are on the USB IF as possible listed in the NWI. As such, if > your company is a member of the USB IF, you have reviewed the current draft > of the IPP over USB Specification, and you would like to be listed on the > NWI form, please let me know. > > Thanks. > > Andrew > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > _______________________________________________ > ipp mailing list > ipp@pwg.org > https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --0022158c0b5179650104a2e0e1ed Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Andrew,

Samsung is a member of the USB IF (I checked).

I h= ave reviewed the specification and would like to have Samsung
listed on = the NWI.

Cheers,
- Ira (Consulting Architect in Samsung Advanced = Printing Systems Lab)

Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - L= inux Foundation Open Printing WG
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
Co-C= hair - TCG Hardcopy WG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic<= /a>
http://sites.google.com/site/highnorth= inc
mailto:blueroo= fmusic@gmail.com
Christmas through April:
=A0 579 Park Place=A0 S= aline, MI=A0 48176
=A0 734-944-0094
May to Christmas:
=A0 PO Box 2= 21=A0 Grand Marais, MI 49839
=A0 906-494-2434



On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 8:06 PM, Mitchell= , Andrew (Solutions Architect) <andrew.mitchell2@hp.com> wrote:
All,

I've uploaded an updated IPP over USB to the white paper directory here= :

ftp://ftp.pwg.org//pub/pwg/ipp/whitepap= er/draft-ippusbspecification-20110428.pdf

This is most likely the last draft prior to the F2F, and the last draft pri= or to submission to the USB IF, although we can go through this document at= the F2F. I am currently filling out the NWI (New Work Initiative) Applicat= ion Form for submission to the USB IF. I believe we have the 5 USB IF membe= rs needed to submit the NWI, but I would like to get as many of the PWG mem= bers who are on the USB IF as possible listed in the NWI. As such, if your = company is a member of the USB IF, you have reviewed the current draft of t= he IPP over USB Specification, and you would like to be listed on the NWI f= orm, please let me know.

Thanks.

Andrew

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
ipp@pwg.org
http= s://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --0022158c0b5179650104a2e0e1ed-- --===============1315797581== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp --===============1315797581==-- From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Mon May 9 17:36:09 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E40E081B for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 17:36:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MJ-srD4tQC9r for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 17:36:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1743EE0778 for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 17:36:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FF917960C; Mon, 9 May 2011 20:07:30 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from g5t0007.atlanta.hp.com (g5t0007.atlanta.hp.com [15.192.0.44]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B36A7960C for ; Mon, 9 May 2011 20:07:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from G6W0640.americas.hpqcorp.net (g6w0640.atlanta.hp.com [16.230.34.76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by g5t0007.atlanta.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BFC01463D for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 00:07:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from G4W1852.americas.hpqcorp.net (16.234.97.230) by G6W0640.americas.hpqcorp.net (16.230.34.76) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Tue, 10 May 2011 00:06:23 +0000 Received: from GVW1155EXB.americas.hpqcorp.net ([16.232.35.138]) by G4W1852.americas.hpqcorp.net ([16.234.97.230]) with mapi; Tue, 10 May 2011 00:06:22 +0000 From: "Mitchell, Andrew (Solutions Architect)" To: "ipp@pwg.org" Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 00:06:19 +0000 Thread-Topic: IPP over USB Thread-Index: AcwOphhNkyar3BYkTKqv5V2XYZfrMw== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.10.0.110310 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Subject: [IPP] IPP over USB X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 4FF917960C.A8DCA X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org All, I've uploaded an updated IPP over USB to the white paper directory here: ftp://ftp.pwg.org//pub/pwg/ipp/whitepaper/draft-ippusbspecification-2011042= 8.pdf This is most likely the last draft prior to the F2F, and the last draft pri= or to submission to the USB IF, although we can go through this document at= the F2F. I am currently filling out the NWI (New Work Initiative) Applicat= ion Form for submission to the USB IF. I believe we have the 5 USB IF membe= rs needed to submit the NWI, but I would like to get as many of the PWG mem= bers who are on the USB IF as possible listed in the NWI. As such, if your = company is a member of the USB IF, you have reviewed the current draft of t= he IPP over USB Specification, and you would like to be listed on the NWI f= orm, please let me know. Thanks. Andrew --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp From lotto_agent1@ymail.com Tue May 10 05:32:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E78E0662 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 05:32:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.499 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HELO_EQ_AU=0.377, HOST_EQ_AU=0.327, J_CHICKENPOX_44=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_64=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_74=0.6, RELAY_IS_203=0.994] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mMWU0oMY4V7q for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 05:32:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from webmail.icp-qv1-irony-out1.iinet.net.au (webmail.icp-qv1-irony-out1.iinet.net.au [203.59.1.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FE7EE0715 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 05:32:09 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: At4gAOYvyU0KAikv/2dsb2JhbACDDoFGki6BF45cWoV6ghWdAo4fgUSHAIkagSqDYIEFBIljhg2ERIoa X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,346,1301846400"; d="scan'208";a="783933278" Received: from unknown (HELO icp-osb-atmail13.iinet.net.au) ([10.2.41.47]) by webmail.icp-qv1-irony-out1.iinet.net.au with ESMTP; 10 May 2011 20:32:02 +0800 Received: (qmail 29069 invoked from network); 10 May 2011 12:32:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) ([127.0.0.1]) (envelope-sender ) by icp-osb-atmail13.iinet.net.au (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 10 May 2011 12:32:02 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: weekly-lotto To: accountantguti@w.cn Subject: You've been awarded 1,000,000 GBP Reply-To: lotto_agent1@ymail.com X-Origin: 41.220.69.30 Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 12:32:02 +0000 Message-Id: <9934.1305030722@iinet.net.au> X-Mailer: AtMail 4.51 - 41.220.69.30 - origins@iinet.net.au File for your claim.Full Name,Your Phone Number,Your Country,Your Occupatio= n,Sex From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Tue May 10 17:40:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23667E06C0 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 17:40:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7OJNgecxBSzJ for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 17:40:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FDC0E0681 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 17:40:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA76F795EC; Tue, 10 May 2011 20:40:28 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from g5t0008.atlanta.hp.com (g5t0008.atlanta.hp.com [15.192.0.45]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AA8079577 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 20:40:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from G1W0400.americas.hpqcorp.net (g1w0400.americas.hpqcorp.net [16.236.31.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by g5t0008.atlanta.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70B9524804 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 00:40:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from G4W0659.americas.hpqcorp.net (16.234.40.187) by G1W0400.americas.hpqcorp.net (16.236.31.10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Wed, 11 May 2011 00:39:46 +0000 Received: from GVW1155EXB.americas.hpqcorp.net ([16.232.35.138]) by G4W0659.americas.hpqcorp.net ([16.234.40.187]) with mapi; Wed, 11 May 2011 00:39:46 +0000 From: "Mitchell, Andrew (Solutions Architect)" To: "ipp@pwg.org" Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 00:39:42 +0000 Thread-Topic: IPP over USB Specification Thread-Index: AcwPc+zvGhcKFlr3RwudodNhF0qf1w== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.10.0.110310 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Subject: [IPP] IPP over USB Specification X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: BA76F795EC.A77B9 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org A new draft has been posted. Somehow between draft 17 and draft 18 the Scan= capabilities had been replaced by raster formats. That's what I get for ad= ding a couple raster formats and trying to make sure they were consistent b= etween protocols. This has been corrected, and is the ONLY thing changed be= tween draft 19 and 20. The new draft is here: ftp://ftp.pwg.org//pub/pwg/ipp/whitepaper/draft-ippusbspecification-2011051= 0.pdf Good thing I was doing a final read through prior to submitting the NWI to = the USB IF. Andrew --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Sun May 15 13:18:00 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62C36E06AF for ; Sun, 15 May 2011 13:18:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.739 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.739 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gEXjy853VdYI for ; Sun, 15 May 2011 13:17:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5793FE06CB for ; Sun, 15 May 2011 13:17:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6D57794A7; Sun, 15 May 2011 16:17:43 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com (mail-fx0-f46.google.com [209.85.161.46]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FFEF794A3 for ; Sun, 15 May 2011 16:17:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so3581992fxm.5 for ; Sun, 15 May 2011 13:17:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=lBi6zUbaxqnelhQa+YYfzdBBhO3oAyrL+3Eyjm5SRLg=; b=Tx4nGeTcPcKajhrlXaZoHTaJJYexYWrbygLv8A6sEOOWwjypmcJrlz3vCoKOXUck+Y 7J1xwIdkrGneZxA+jadfwdLVvcCx4bMEkCtFlDYCQY8+xmvIsV3ICjyaHQ/kOnrQGE2D me0UipAQQAJXYazz8sB9/j3lcbVkk9urA80d0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=wBCf4JD2mD7YfwRJggEE3/4Idkvw/zO62qrR3oRRpA2MV63KmJgO9Be0Jn8a5YLm41 s4m0teBsw4gg1JLxwTIOvfmXAJh8C+5l+7MJdKCDaIouYp5pvZ2Wa28Baj0dJbPeS0xR TN2pPS8rjQmaSrH219iwkufT3uGARiix6Cw+0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.17.140 with SMTP id s12mr901716faa.49.1305490649279; Sun, 15 May 2011 13:17:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.121.142 with HTTP; Sun, 15 May 2011 13:17:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 16:17:29 -0400 Message-ID: From: Ira McDonald To: ipp@pwg.org, Michael R Sweet , Paul Tykodi , Ira McDonald X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: Subject: [IPP] IPP Agenda - 4pm EDT Monday 16 May 2011 X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0482327147==" Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: A6D57794A7.A827F X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org --===============0482327147== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151747b8ac686df404a3563a1b --00151747b8ac686df404a3563a1b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, Our next IPP WG call will be on Monday. Monday 16 May 1-2pm US PDT / 4-5pm US EDT Call-in toll-free number (US/Canada): 1-866-469-3239 Call-in toll number (US/Canada): 1-650-429-3300 (Primary) Call-in toll number (US/Canada): 1-408-856-9570 (Backup) Attendee Access Code: *******# Attendee ID Code: # (empty) If you need the Attendee Access code, please email me a request. Live Meeting Info (courtesy of Pete Zehler): Link: https://www.livemeeting.com/cc/xerox/join?id=PWG_MFD&role=attend&pw=LetMeIn URL: https://www.livemeeting.com/cc/xerox/join Meeting ID: PWG_MFD Entry Code: LetMeIn *** Main Objective - Review IPP WG and Cloud Imaging WG slides *** Agenda: (1) PWG IP Policy and Minute Taker - Mike? (2) Approve IPP minutes from previous meeting - ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/minutes/ippv2-concall-minutes-20110502.pdf (3) Review IPP WG slides for PWG F2F (Mike) - if available (4) Review Cloud Imaging WG slides for PWG F2F (Mike/Ron) - if available (5) Discussion of IPP Everywhere (Mike/Ira) - http://pwg-wiki.wikispaces.com/IPP+Everywhere (6) Next Steps - Use Case BOF at PWG F2F on Tuesday 24 May - IPP WG sessions at PWG F2F on Wednesday/Thursday 25-26 May - All - Post more use cases to IPP/Cloud Imaging mailing lists Cheers, - Ira (IPP WG Co-Chair) Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect) Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG Co-Chair - TCG Hardcopy WG IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB Blue Roof Music/High North Inc http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com Christmas through April: 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176 734-944-0094 May to Christmas: PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 906-494-2434 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --00151747b8ac686df404a3563a1b Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi,

Our next IPP WG call will be on Monday.

=A0 Monday 16 May 1-2pm US PDT / 4-5pm US EDT

=A0 Call-in toll-free number (US/Canada): 1-866-469-3239
=A0 Call-in toll number (US/Canada): 1-650-429-3300 (Primary)
=A0 Call-in toll number (US/Canada): 1-408-856-9570 (Backup)

=A0 Attendee Access Code: *******#
=A0 Attendee ID Code: # (empty)

If you need the Attendee Access code, please email me a request.

Live Meeting Info (courtesy of Pete Zehler):

=A0 Link: https= ://www.livemeeting.com/cc/xerox/join?id=3DPWG_MFD&role=3Dattend&pw= =3DLetMeIn
=A0 URL: https://www.livemeeting.com/cc/xerox/join
=A0 Meeting ID: PWG_= MFD
=A0 Entry Code: LetMeIn

*** Main Objective - Review IPP WG and Cloud Imaging WG slides ***

Agenda:

(1) PWG IP Policy and Minute Taker
=A0 =A0=A0 - Mike?

(2) Approve IPP minutes from previous meeting
=A0=A0 =A0 - = ftp://ftp.pwg.= org/pub/pwg/ipp/minutes/ippv2-concall-minutes-20110502.pdf

(3) Review IPP WG slides for PWG F2F (Mike)
=A0=A0=A0=A0 - if available

(4) Review Cloud Imaging WG slides for P= WG F2F (Mike/Ron)
=A0=A0=A0=A0 - if available

(5) Discussion of IPP Everywhere (Mike/Ira)
=A0=A0=A0=A0 - http://pwg-wiki.wikispaces.com/IPP+Everywhere

(6) Next Steps
=A0=A0=A0=A0 - Use Case BOF at PWG F2F on Tu= esday 24 May
=A0=A0=A0=A0 - IPP WG sessions at PWG F2F on Wednesday/Thur= sday 25-26 May
=A0=A0=A0=A0 - All - Post more use cases to IPP/Cloud Imaging mailing lists=

Cheers,
- Ira (IPP WG Co-Chair)

Ira McDonald (Mus= ician / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WGCo-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
Co-Chair - TCG Hardcopy WG
IETF Desi= gnated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic<= /a>
http://sites.google.com/site/highnorth= inc
mailto:blueroo= fmusic@gmail.com
Christmas through April:
=A0 579 Park Place=A0 S= aline, MI=A0 48176
=A0 734-944-0094
May to Christmas:
=A0 PO Box 2= 21=A0 Grand Marais, MI 49839
=A0 906-494-2434


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --00151747b8ac686df404a3563a1b-- --===============0482327147== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp --===============0482327147==-- From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Sun May 15 13:23:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F32E5E06D0 for ; Sun, 15 May 2011 13:23:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.669 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.669 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.929, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3nsJQv784rxi for ; Sun, 15 May 2011 13:23:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9D6E06AF for ; Sun, 15 May 2011 13:23:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B78F1794B0; Sun, 15 May 2011 16:23:16 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com (mail-fx0-f46.google.com [209.85.161.46]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA6A794AD for ; Sun, 15 May 2011 16:23:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so3583766fxm.5 for ; Sun, 15 May 2011 13:23:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=7PEdG0p7m9akIy1aOj9TdJ3f2j37XOMAkQd13qC5Oag=; b=XCCUMNUFushhPeq9P6IQ+2mg2+ddLmolRDhu48DYIoIQOvh5pzTMth1LQaX99OagPZ pJSajDbr4NL0I1NdxQrVpUDrdfzmtYa2FL/IIULs1TD+n7CnrIOymfninVfDTuosLA70 TE4/Egge/xlmuZU9ABgnwGFEegVjXVsMxX25c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=i51f7GXfx1vigjWf9VBAs56BzmBRiJdk+U0WT3cDDVe61YwmZUbYg1NQeg35aZBQ7b ymEhqiX+hV5WlOEny/RJexhr6s/2MsJBBuN2zGAHbuA+B0ByHG4FJa7+U/HijeHqDZWX uT0Viatqbv0DNu1PO5AXvLY49/v31GJnJFqnQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.30.82 with SMTP id t18mr499930fac.106.1305490980575; Sun, 15 May 2011 13:23:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.121.142 with HTTP; Sun, 15 May 2011 13:23:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 16:23:00 -0400 Message-ID: From: Ira McDonald To: ipp@pwg.org, Michael R Sweet , Paul Tykodi , Ira McDonald X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: Subject: [IPP] IPP Agenda - 1pm EDT Monday 16 May 2011 [fixed time] X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1473051977==" Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: B78F1794B0.A89FF X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org --===============1473051977== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151744866c27989304a3564e49 --00151744866c27989304a3564e49 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, Our next IPP WG call will be on Monday. Monday 16 May 10-11am US PDT / 1-2pm US EDT Call-in toll-free number (US/Canada): 1-866-469-3239 Call-in toll number (US/Canada): 1-650-429-3300 (Primary) Call-in toll number (US/Canada): 1-408-856-9570 (Backup) Attendee Access Code: *******# Attendee ID Code: # (empty) If you need the Attendee Access code, please email me a request. Live Meeting Info (courtesy of Pete Zehler): Link: https://www.livemeeting.com/cc/xerox/join?id=PWG_MFD&role=attend&pw=LetMeIn URL: https://www.livemeeting.com/cc/xerox/join Meeting ID: PWG_MFD Entry Code: LetMeIn *** Main Objective - Review IPP WG and Cloud Imaging WG slides *** Agenda: (1) PWG IP Policy and Minute Taker - Mike? (2) Approve IPP minutes from previous meeting - ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/minutes/ippv2-concall-minutes-20110502.pdf (3) Review IPP WG slides for PWG F2F (Mike) - if available (4) Review Cloud Imaging WG slides for PWG F2F (Mike/Ron) - if available (5) Discussion of IPP Everywhere (Mike/Ira) - http://pwg-wiki.wikispaces.com/IPP+Everywhere (6) Next Steps - Use Case BOF at PWG F2F on Tuesday 24 May - IPP WG sessions at PWG F2F on Wednesday/Thursday 25-26 May - All - Post more use cases to IPP/Cloud Imaging mailing lists Cheers, - Ira (IPP WG Co-Chair) Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect) Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG Co-Chair - TCG Hardcopy WG IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB Blue Roof Music/High North Inc http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com Christmas through April: 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176 734-944-0094 May to Christmas: PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 906-494-2434 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --00151744866c27989304a3564e49 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi,

Our next IPP WG call will be on Monday.

=A0 Monday 16 May 10-11am US PDT / 1-2pm US EDT

=A0 Call-in toll-free number (US/Canada): 1-866-469-3239
=A0 Call-in toll number (US/Canada): 1-650-429-3300 (Primary)
=A0 Call-in toll number (US/Canada): 1-408-856-9570 (Backup)

=A0 Attendee Access Code: *******#
=A0 Attendee ID Code: # (empty)

If you need the Attendee Access code, please email me a request.

Live Meeting Info (courtesy of Pete Zehler):

=A0 Link: https= ://www.livemeeting.com/cc/xerox/join?id=3DPWG_MFD&role=3Dattend&pw= =3DLetMeIn
=A0 URL: https://www.livemeeting.com/cc/xerox/join
=A0 Meeting ID: PWG_= MFD
=A0 Entry Code: LetMeIn

*** Main Objective - Review IPP WG and Cloud Imaging WG slides ***

Agenda:

(1) PWG IP Policy and Minute Taker
=A0 =A0=A0 - Mike?

(2) Approve IPP minutes from previous meeting
=A0=A0 =A0 - = ftp://ftp.pwg.= org/pub/pwg/ipp/minutes/ippv2-concall-minutes-20110502.pdf

(3) Review IPP WG slides for PWG F2F (Mike)
=A0=A0=A0=A0 - if available

(4) Review Cloud Imaging WG slides for P= WG F2F (Mike/Ron)
=A0=A0=A0=A0 - if available

(5) Discussion of IPP Everywhere (Mike/Ira)
=A0=A0=A0=A0 - http://pwg-wiki.wikispaces.com/IPP+Everywhere

(6) Next Steps
=A0=A0=A0=A0 - Use Case BOF at PWG F2F on Tu= esday 24 May
=A0=A0=A0=A0 - IPP WG sessions at PWG F2F on Wednesday/Thur= sday 25-26 May
=A0=A0=A0=A0 - All - Post more use cases to IPP/Cloud Imaging mailing lists=

Cheers,
- Ira (IPP WG Co-Chair)

Ira McDonald (Mus= ician / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WGCo-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
Co-Chair - TCG Hardcopy WG
IETF Desi= gnated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic<= /a>
http://sites.google.com/site/highnorth= inc
mailto:blueroo= fmusic@gmail.com
Christmas through April:
=A0 579 Park Place=A0 S= aline, MI=A0 48176
=A0 734-944-0094
May to Christmas:
=A0 PO Box 2= 21=A0 Grand Marais, MI 49839
=A0 906-494-2434



--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --00151744866c27989304a3564e49-- --===============1473051977== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp --===============1473051977==-- From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Sun May 15 18:41:58 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4840E06D6 for ; Sun, 15 May 2011 18:41:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PDreiO94-zUJ for ; Sun, 15 May 2011 18:41:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4819CE06B9 for ; Sun, 15 May 2011 18:41:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD5E079513; Sun, 15 May 2011 21:41:37 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from mail-out.apple.com (mail-out.apple.com [17.151.62.50]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41750794D7; Sun, 15 May 2011 21:41:23 -0400 (EDT) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from relay16.apple.com ([17.128.113.55]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTP id <0LL9006M3M090JW0@mail-out.apple.com>; Sun, 15 May 2011 18:41:23 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807137-b7cd4ae000003108-25-4dd080c2d9f5 Received: from [17.151.74.135] (Unknown_Domain [17.151.74.135]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay16.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 0C.D6.12552.2C080DD4; Sun, 15 May 2011 18:41:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Michael Sweet Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 18:41:22 -0700 Message-id: <8A2998F9-2FF9-4520-9A4E-2999E4D8F185@apple.com> To: cloud@pwg.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: ipp@pwg.org Subject: [IPP] Updated Cloud WG session slides posted X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: AD5E079513.A7498 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org All, I have uploaded new slides based on our discussions last Monday at: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/cloud/slides/cloud-wd-meeting-may-11d2.pdf We will give these one more look on Monday in the IPP WG telecon. ________________________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Sun May 15 18:51:56 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2147DE071B for ; Sun, 15 May 2011 18:51:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TU59fGSm9LNE for ; Sun, 15 May 2011 18:51:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11CDCE06D6 for ; Sun, 15 May 2011 18:51:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AFED794F5; Sun, 15 May 2011 21:51:40 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from mail-out.apple.com (mail-out.apple.com [17.151.62.49]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B294794D7 for ; Sun, 15 May 2011 21:51:27 -0400 (EDT) MIME-version: 1.0 Received: from relay11.apple.com ([17.128.113.48]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPS id <0LL90038PMHMRWO0@mail-out.apple.com> for ipp@pwg.org; Sun, 15 May 2011 18:51:26 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807130-b7c15ae000005aca-7d-4dd0831d8219 Received: from [17.151.74.135] (Unknown_Domain [17.151.74.135]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay11.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 0E.14.23242.E1380DD4; Sun, 15 May 2011 18:51:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Michael Sweet In-reply-to: Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 18:51:26 -0700 Message-id: References: To: Ira McDonald X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: ipp@pwg.org Subject: [IPP] Re: IPP Agenda - 1pm EDT Monday 16 May 2011 [fixed time] X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1824011406==" Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 6AFED794F5.A76CD X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org --===============1824011406== Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_oWPvTcA3+zoXE9pJ4tCXPA)" --Boundary_(ID_oWPvTcA3+zoXE9pJ4tCXPA) Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT I have uploaded the IPP and Cloud slides to: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/slides/ipp-wg-agenda-may-11d1.pdf ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/cloud/slides/cloud-wg-meeting-may-11d2.pdf On May 15, 2011, at 1:23 PM, Ira McDonald wrote: > Hi, > > Our next IPP WG call will be on Monday. > > Monday 16 May 10-11am US PDT / 1-2pm US EDT > > Call-in toll-free number (US/Canada): 1-866-469-3239 > Call-in toll number (US/Canada): 1-650-429-3300 (Primary) > Call-in toll number (US/Canada): 1-408-856-9570 (Backup) > > Attendee Access Code: *******# > Attendee ID Code: # (empty) > > If you need the Attendee Access code, please email me a request. > > Live Meeting Info (courtesy of Pete Zehler): > > Link: https://www.livemeeting.com/cc/xerox/join?id=PWG_MFD&role=attend&pw=LetMeIn > URL: https://www.livemeeting.com/cc/xerox/join > Meeting ID: PWG_MFD > Entry Code: LetMeIn > > *** Main Objective - Review IPP WG and Cloud Imaging WG slides *** > > Agenda: > > (1) PWG IP Policy and Minute Taker > - Mike? > > (2) Approve IPP minutes from previous meeting > - ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/minutes/ippv2-concall-minutes-20110502.pdf > > (3) Review IPP WG slides for PWG F2F (Mike) > - if available > > (4) Review Cloud Imaging WG slides for PWG F2F (Mike/Ron) > - if available > > (5) Discussion of IPP Everywhere (Mike/Ira) > - http://pwg-wiki.wikispaces.com/IPP+Everywhere > > (6) Next Steps > - Use Case BOF at PWG F2F on Tuesday 24 May > - IPP WG sessions at PWG F2F on Wednesday/Thursday 25-26 May > - All - Post more use cases to IPP/Cloud Imaging mailing lists > > Cheers, > - Ira (IPP WG Co-Chair) > > Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect) > Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG > Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG > Co-Chair - TCG Hardcopy WG > IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB > Blue Roof Music/High North Inc > http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic > http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc > mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com > Christmas through April: > 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176 > 734-944-0094 > May to Christmas: > PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 > 906-494-2434 > ________________________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --Boundary_(ID_oWPvTcA3+zoXE9pJ4tCXPA) Content-type: text/html; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT I have uploaded the IPP and Cloud slides to:



On May 15, 2011, at 1:23 PM, Ira McDonald wrote:

Hi,

Our next IPP WG call will be on Monday.

  Monday 16 May 10-11am US PDT / 1-2pm US EDT

  Call-in toll-free number (US/Canada): 1-866-469-3239
  Call-in toll number (US/Canada): 1-650-429-3300 (Primary)
  Call-in toll number (US/Canada): 1-408-856-9570 (Backup)

  Attendee Access Code: *******#
  Attendee ID Code: # (empty)

If you need the Attendee Access code, please email me a request.

Live Meeting Info (courtesy of Pete Zehler):

  Link: https://www.livemeeting.com/cc/xerox/join?id=PWG_MFD&role=attend&pw=LetMeIn
  URL: https://www.livemeeting.com/cc/xerox/join
  Meeting ID: PWG_MFD
  Entry Code: LetMeIn

*** Main Objective - Review IPP WG and Cloud Imaging WG slides ***

Agenda:

(1) PWG IP Policy and Minute Taker
     - Mike?

(2) Approve IPP minutes from previous meeting
     - ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/minutes/ippv2-concall-minutes-20110502.pdf

(3) Review IPP WG slides for PWG F2F (Mike)
     - if available

(4) Review Cloud Imaging WG slides for PWG F2F (Mike/Ron)
     - if available

(5) Discussion of IPP Everywhere (Mike/Ira)
     - http://pwg-wiki.wikispaces.com/IPP+Everywhere

(6) Next Steps
     - Use Case BOF at PWG F2F on Tuesday 24 May
     - IPP WG sessions at PWG F2F on Wednesday/Thursday 25-26 May
     - All - Post more use cases to IPP/Cloud Imaging mailing lists

Cheers,
- Ira (IPP WG Co-Chair)

Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
Co-Chair - TCG Hardcopy WG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto:blueroofmusic@gmail.com
Christmas through April:
  579 Park Place  Saline, MI  48176
  734-944-0094
May to Christmas:
  PO Box 221  Grand Marais, MI 49839
  906-494-2434



________________________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --Boundary_(ID_oWPvTcA3+zoXE9pJ4tCXPA)-- --===============1824011406== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp --===============1824011406==-- From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Mon May 16 08:05:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CD69E0765 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 08:05:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.133 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.133 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.465, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TYh82o4vMFfL for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 08:05:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 653DDE076E for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 08:05:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BD4579521; Mon, 16 May 2011 11:04:58 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com (mail-fx0-f46.google.com [209.85.161.46]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F03C779519; Mon, 16 May 2011 11:04:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so4186792fxm.5 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 08:04:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=f8H6LBwf2C3rYo2pxwIP9ExhT88bkccCvfvobR0RmvI=; b=kCnsSnq+1+x+KQuDMcYmw6XWbQGIdtY6WU39ZhaoH56DO0jg2XWTEm65ceFB0fDPrH NaMOfH5vEAODdoKUe9mHBkd7T566/+D/jQPLsWdcEk1GzmC0SIsbjwXokobNFbOn7Z1C 9nPfwzjynulcoIUC6dzwrhVeuJfP722QwNiic= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=inuzelg5YfCIs/4GVJ2W3LpfVVES4FlCX5YMYgMF3zXPjAJMYJVfpypPLhGtzi9AGC vFH4w4weuwPYbUHqdSeOWKds/pGIAFIDg+OeuosE/Kky9TGoQCy8LasngomKSxy+A11N dNtJppoRZG93OzAQWGu0j2p0CMHczTjWi9VfQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.20.210 with SMTP id g18mr3362091fab.30.1305558283724; Mon, 16 May 2011 08:04:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.121.142 with HTTP; Mon, 16 May 2011 08:04:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8A2998F9-2FF9-4520-9A4E-2999E4D8F185@apple.com> References: <8A2998F9-2FF9-4520-9A4E-2999E4D8F185@apple.com> Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 11:04:43 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [IPP] Updated Cloud WG session slides posted From: Ira McDonald To: Michael Sweet , Ira McDonald X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: cloud@pwg.org, ipp@pwg.org X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0534570847==" Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 2BD4579521.A8AE8 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org --===============0534570847== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517478ccebc295c04a365f995 --001517478ccebc295c04a365f995 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, Corrected typo in Cloud slides link below - "-wd" to "-wg". Cheers, - Ira On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Michael Sweet wrote: > All, > > I have uploaded new slides based on our discussions last Monday at: > > > ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/cloud/slides/cloud-wg-meeting-may-11d2.pdf > > We will give these one more look on Monday in the IPP WG telecon. > > ________________________________________________________________________ > Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > _______________________________________________ > ipp mailing list > ipp@pwg.org > https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --001517478ccebc295c04a365f995 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi,

Corrected typo in Cloud slides link below - "-wd" to &= quot;-wg".

Cheers,
- Ira



On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Michael= Sweet <msweet@app= le.com> wrote:
All,

I have uploaded new slides based on our discussions last Monday at:

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/cloud/sli= des/cloud-wg-meeting-may-11d2.pdf

We will give these one more look on Monday in the IPP WG telecon.

________________________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
ipp@pwg.org
http= s://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --001517478ccebc295c04a365f995-- --===============0534570847== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp --===============0534570847==-- From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Mon May 16 11:21:58 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85868E068B for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 11:21:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nZ3gm4GXkw9U for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 11:21:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD2C3E064E for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 11:21:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 199B279522; Mon, 16 May 2011 14:21:43 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from mail-out.apple.com (honeycrisp.apple.com [17.151.62.51]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A05D79522 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 14:21:30 -0400 (EDT) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from relay14.apple.com ([17.128.113.52]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPS id <0LLA00C09WAROEH0@mail-out.apple.com> for ipp@pwg.org; Mon, 16 May 2011 11:21:29 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807134-b7c00ae0000074fb-35-4dd16b2975c5 Received: from da0704a-dhcp142.apple.com (da0704a-dhcp142.apple.com [17.197.43.142]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay14.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 6F.C2.29947.92B61DD4; Mon, 16 May 2011 11:21:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Michael Sweet Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 11:21:29 -0700 To: ipp@pwg.org Message-id: <8B820568-C121-4EE0-9CD5-A497B81C420E@apple.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Subject: [IPP] Minutes posted from today's conference call X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 199B279522.A7D8A X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org All, I have posted the minutes from today's conference call at: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/minutes/ippv2-concall-minutes-20110516.pdf Action items: - Mike to issue new draft of JPS3 with changes accepted up to section 5.5.14 (BEFORE F2F) - Paul and Ira to solicit DLNA assistance for UPNP discovery (ONGOING) - Mike and Paul to reach out to label/portable printer vendors to join IPP WG discussions (ONGOING) ________________________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp From pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Tue May 17 03:34:03 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9252E0715 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 03:34:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uvFwtDHOPnge for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 03:34:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 805BAE06FE for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 03:34:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7086D79544; Tue, 17 May 2011 06:33:45 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Delivered-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Received: from USA7109MR003.ACS-INC.COM (usa7109mr003.acs-inc.com [63.101.151.12]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D6A7953E for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 06:33:32 -0400 (EDT) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjQBAANO0k0Nl9IPmWdsb2JhbACCZaM0FAEBAQEBCAsLBxQlyBmDLoJrBIIxhB+NeYpd X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,224,1304312400"; d="scan'208,217";a="42124884" Received: from usa7061gw002.na.xerox.net ([13.151.210.15]) by USA7109MR003.ACS-INC.COM with ESMTP; 17 May 2011 05:33:31 -0500 Received: from USA7061MS04.na.xerox.net ([13.151.235.15]) by USA7061GW002.na.xerox.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 17 May 2011 03:33:28 -0700 x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 03:33:28 -0700 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: PWG MFD Copy Service Formal Vote (May 17 - June 10, 2011) Thread-Index: AcwUfcktlIt6PQPDTgS8GzJqJw88FA== From: "Zehler, Peter" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 May 2011 10:33:28.0964 (UTC) FILETIME=[DC7E6440:01CC147D] X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Subject: [Pwg-Announce] PWG MFD Copy Service Formal Vote (May 17 - June 10, 2011) X-BeenThere: pwg-announce@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Printer Working Group Announcement List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1920315011==" Sender: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 7086D79544.ACA42 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============1920315011== Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CC147D.DC5AF9B1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CC147D.DC5AF9B1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Greetings: =20 VOTES ARE CONFIDENTIAL! See voting instructions below. =20 This email initiates the Formal Approval vote by the PWG membership on the Copy Service Semantic Model and Service Interface specification, which is located at: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/mfd/wd/wd-mfdcopymodel10-20110506.pdf =20 The complete list of PWG Last Call issues and resolutions is located at: =20 ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/mfd/wd/CopyServiceLastCallComment-resolution-2 0110 321.pdf =20 =20 VOTING PERIOD: This Formal Vote will start today on Tuesday May 17, 2011 and will end at 10pm (US Pacific Time) on Friday June 10, 2011. =20 Valid votes are: Yes, No, No (with Strong Objection), Abstain. =20 =20 PWG Privacy Policy: Your vote is confidential and will not be disclosed by PWG officers or document editors. =20 =20 HOW TO VOTE: =20 Send an email with *exactly* the following subject line format: PWG MFD Copy Service Formal Vote --- =20 Example: PWG MFD Copy Service Formal Vote -Acme-McGee-Yes =20 =20 Rules: =20 (1) Any "No" vote MUST state the reason for the "No" vote and MUST contain a description of the *technical* changes required to turn the "No" vote into a "Yes" vote - otherwise the "No" vote will NOT be counted, per PWG Process/3.0. =20 (2) Any "No" vote MUST NOT contain *editorial* comments, per PWG Process/3.0. =20 (3) Any "Yes" vote MAY contain "editorial" comments, per PWG Process/3.0. =20 (4) Any "Yes" vote MUST NOT contain any *technical* comments, per PWG Process/3.0. =20 (5) Any "Abstain" vote counts toward quorum, but not approval. =20 =20 WHERE TO SEND YOUR VOTE: =20 Please send your vote to *all* of the following email addresses (replacing "dot" with '.' and "at" with '@'): =20 msweet"at"apple"dot"com (Mike Sweet, PWG Chair, IPP/2.0 SE Co-Editor) =20 ptykodi"at"tykodi"dot"com (Paul Tykodi, PWG Secretary) =20 Peter"dot"Zehler"at"Xerox"dot"com (Peter Zehler, MFD WG -Chair) =20 =20 Please do NOT simply reply to this note on PWG-Announce or the MFD WG list (to preserve the confidentiality of your vote). =20 =20 Notes: =20 (1) This Formal Vote is being conducted under the rules of the PWG Process/3.0 and the current PWG Policy on Intellectual Property and Confidentiality agreement. The 2011 PWG Membership Agreement calls out both of these documents and the links are provided below. =20 (2) To be eligible to vote the member MUST have submitted a signed copy of the 2011 PWG Membership Agreement and paid their dues. =20 The PWG Definition of the Standards Development Process Version 3.0 is located at: http://www.pwg.org/chair/membership_docs/pwg-process30.pdf =20 The PWG Policy on Intellectual Property and Confidentiality is located at: http://www.pwg.org/chair/membership_docs/pwg-ip-policy.pdf =20 Cheers, - Pete (Chair MFD WG) =20 Peter Zehler Xerox Research Center Webster Email: Peter.Zehler@Xerox.com =20 Voice: (585) 265-8755 FAX: (585) 265-7441 US Mail: Peter Zehler Xerox Corp. 800 Phillips Rd. M/S 128-25E Webster NY, 14580-9701=20 =20 --=20 This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CC147D.DC5AF9B1 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Greetings:

 

VOTES ARE CONFIDENTIAL! See voting instructions below.

=

 

This e= mail initiates the Formal Approval vote by the PWG membership on the Copy S= ervice Semantic Model and Service Interface specification, which is located= at:

ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/mfd/w= d/wd-mfdcopymodel10-20110506.pdf

=  

The complete list of PWG Last = Call issues and resolutions is located at:

 

ftp://ftp.= pwg.org/pub/pwg/mfd/wd/CopyServiceLastCallComment-resolution-20110=

321.pdf

 

 

VOTING PERIOD: This Formal Vote will start today on Tue= sday May 17, 2011 and will end at 10pm (US Pacific Time) on Friday June 10,= 2011.

 

Valid votes are: Yes, No, No (with Strong Objection), Absta= in.

 

 

PWG Privacy Policy= : Your vote is confidential and will not be disclosed by PWG officers or do= cument editors.

 

=

 

HOW TO= VOTE:

 

Send an email with *exactly* the following subject line for= mat:

PWG MFD Copy Service Formal Vote= -<company name>-<voter's last name>-<Yes/No/Abstain>

 

Example:

PWG MFD Copy Service Fo= rmal Vote -Acme-McGee-Yes

 =

 

Rules:

 

(1) Any "No" vote MUST state the reason for th= e "No" vote and MUST contain a description of the *technical* cha= nges required to turn the "No" vote into a "Yes" vote -= otherwise the "No" vote will NOT be counted, per PWG Process/3.0= .

 

(2) Any "No" vote MUST NOT contain *editorial* comments= , per PWG Process/3.0.

 

(3) Any "Yes" vote MAY contain &qu= ot;editorial" comments, per PWG Process/3.0.

 

(4) Any "Yes= " vote MUST NOT contain any *technical* comments, per PWG Process/3.0.=

 

(5) Any "Abstain" vote counts toward quorum, but not app= roval.

 

 

WHERE TO SEND = YOUR VOTE:

 

Please send your vote to *all* of the following email ad= dresses (replacing "dot" with '.' and "at" with '@'):

 

msweet"at"apple"dot"com (Mike Sweet, PWG Chair, = IPP/2.0 SE Co-Editor)

 

ptykodi"at"tykodi"dot"com= (Paul Tykodi, PWG Secretary)

&n= bsp;

Peter"dot"Zehler"at&qu= ot;Xerox"dot"com (Peter Zehler, MFD WG -Chair)

 

 = ;

Please do NOT simply reply to this note = on PWG-Announce or the MFD WG list (to preserve the confidentiality of your= vote).

 

 

Notes:

 

(1) This Formal Vote is being conducted under the rules of the PWG

Process/3.0 and the current PWG Policy on In= tellectual Property and Confidentiality agreement. The 2011 PWG Membership = Agreement calls out both of these documents and the links are provided belo= w.

 

(2) To be eligible to vote the member MUST have submitted a sign= ed copy of the 2011 PWG Membership Agreement and paid their dues.

 

T= he PWG Definition of the Standards Development Process Version 3.0 is locat= ed at:

http://www.pwg.org/chair/membershi= p_docs/pwg-process30.pdf

&nb= sp;

The PWG Policy on Intellectual Propert= y and Confidentiality is located at:

= http= ://www.pwg.org/chair/membership_docs/pwg-ip-policy.pdf

 

Cheers,<= o:p>

- Pete (Chair MFD WG)

<= p class=3DMsoPlainText> 

Peter Zehler

Xerox Research Center WebsterEmail: Peter.Zehler@Xerox.com
Voice: (585) 265-8755
FAX: (585) 265-7441
= US Mail: Peter Zehler
Xerox Corp.
800 Phill= ips Rd.
M/S 128-25E=
Webster NY, 14580-9701

 


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CC147D.DC5AF9B1-- --===============1920315011== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pwg-announce mailing list pwg-announce@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/pwg-announce --===============1920315011==-- From pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Tue May 17 14:28:03 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F329AE06E1 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 14:28:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AqK9KDhrVC6Y for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 14:28:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C943E06C1 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 14:28:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DC3879555; Tue, 17 May 2011 17:27:42 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Delivered-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Received: from qmta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.59.228]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0596B79554 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 17:27:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from omta17.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.89]) by qmta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id kkfP1g0021vXlb85FlTUDm; Tue, 17 May 2011 21:27:28 +0000 Received: from VistaBusiness ([24.61.240.234]) by omta17.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id klTT1g01F548CT43dlTU8k; Tue, 17 May 2011 21:27:28 +0000 From: "William Wagner" To: References: In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 17:27:25 -0400 Message-ID: <000001cc14d9$384ef860$a8ece920$@net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Acrn2NxkRUYM+UsWQrmdBdTbREG0TUsJyBVw Content-Language: en-us X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Subject: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last Call - WIMS Projects Charters X-BeenThere: pwg-announce@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Printer Working Group Announcement List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1773639635==" Sender: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 5DC3879555.AD34B X-pwg-MailScanner-From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============1773639635== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01CC14B7.B13D5860" Content-Language: en-us This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01CC14B7.B13D5860 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit All, This is the announcement of Last Calls for three Project Charters describing proposed WIMS (Imaging System Management) projects. The charter drafts are posted at: MFD Alerts: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/wims/charter/wd-mfdalerts-charter-20110515.pdf Coherent MFD Management Interfaces: (CMMI): ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/wims/charter/wd-cmmi-charter-20110515.pdf DMTF/CIM Printer Profile: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/wims/charter/wd-cimprinterprofile-charter-20110515 .pdf These projects are being chartered, with the charters to be submitted for formal PWG approval, to provide greater visibility for and to solicit more PWG member participation in the generation of imaging system management specifications. It is intended that all three of these projects will result in standards for hardcopy imaging equipment, and they should reflect consensus among PWG members. The three projects are not critically interdependent and will be voted on separately. Schedules outlined in the proposed charters may be affected by the personnel resources available and the other concurrent projects. Please review these charters and send comments to the WIMS reflector (wims@pwg.org). charter. We will discuss all received comments during the WIMS Face to Face meeting on May 24 in Webster, NY. The Last Calls will close on Friday, 3 June. Thank you, Bill Wagner, Chairman, WIMS/PMP -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01CC14B7.B13D5860 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

All,<= /p>

 

This is the annou= ncement of Last Calls for three Project Charters describing proposed WIMS (= Imaging System Management) projects. The charter drafts are posted at:=

 

MFD Alerts:

ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/wims/charter/wd-= mfdalerts-charter-20110515.pdf

&n= bsp;

Coherent MFD Management Interfaces: (CMMI):

ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/wims/charter/wd-cmmi-char= ter-20110515.pdf

 

DMTF/CIM Printer Profile:

ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/wims/charter/wd-cimprinterpr= ofile-charter-20110515.pdf

<= span style=3D'font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'> =

These projects are being chartered, with the charters to be s= ubmitted for formal PWG approval, to provide greater visibility for and to = solicit more PWG member participation in the generation of imaging system  management s= pecifications. It is intended that all three of these projects will result = in standards for hardcopy imaging equipment, and they should reflect consen= sus among PWG members. The three projects are not critically interdependent= and will be voted on separately. Schedules outlined in the proposed charte= rs may  be affected by the personnel resources available and the other= concurrent projects.

 

Please rev= iew these charters and send comments t= o the WIMS reflector (wims@pwg.org).

charter.  We wil= l discuss all received comments during= the WIMS Face to Face meeting on May 24 in We= bster, NY. The Last Calls will close on Friday, 3 June.

 

Thank you,

 <= /span>

Bill Wagner, Chairman, WIMS/PMP

<= div>

 

 


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01CC14B7.B13D5860-- --===============1773639635== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pwg-announce mailing list pwg-announce@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/pwg-announce --===============1773639635==-- From pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Tue May 17 17:42:24 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC27FE07D6 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 17:42:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jWEcn8HL7X4a for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 17:42:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0B10E07D1 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 17:42:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 859247957F; Tue, 17 May 2011 20:42:04 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Delivered-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Received: from qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.32]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF00079573 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 20:41:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from omta24.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.76]) by qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id koaF1g0041ei1Bg53ohpfB; Wed, 18 May 2011 00:41:49 +0000 Received: from VistaBusiness ([24.61.240.234]) by omta24.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id koho1g00B548CT43kohozX; Wed, 18 May 2011 00:41:48 +0000 From: "William Wagner" To: References: <000001cc14d9$384ef860$a8ece920$@net> In-Reply-To: <000001cc14d9$384ef860$a8ece920$@net> Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 20:41:47 -0400 Message-ID: <002801cc14f4$5e891680$1b9b4380$@net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Acrn2NxkRUYM+UsWQrmdBdTbREG0TUsJyBVwADzvu+A= Content-Language: en-us X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Subject: [Pwg-Announce] Correction- PWG Last Call - WIMS Projects Charters X-BeenThere: pwg-announce@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Printer Working Group Announcement List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0408475564==" Sender: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 859247957F.AD5AE X-pwg-MailScanner-From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============0408475564== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0029_01CC14D2.D7777680" Content-Language: en-us This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0029_01CC14D2.D7777680 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sorry, Ira corrected me in that the last call duration must be 16 working days (minimum of 22 Calendar days). So last calls end on 8 June. Thanks. Bill Wagner From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org [mailto:pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org] On Behalf Of William Wagner Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 5:27 PM To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Subject: [Pwg-Announce] PWG Last Call - WIMS Projects Charters All, This is the announcement of Last Calls for three Project Charters describing proposed WIMS (Imaging System Management) projects. The charter drafts are posted at: MFD Alerts: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/wims/charter/wd-mfdalerts-charter-20110515.pdf Coherent MFD Management Interfaces: (CMMI): ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/wims/charter/wd-cmmi-charter-20110515.pdf DMTF/CIM Printer Profile: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/wims/charter/wd-cimprinterprofile-charter-20110515 .pdf These projects are being chartered, with the charters to be submitted for formal PWG approval, to provide greater visibility for and to solicit more PWG member participation in the generation of imaging system management specifications. It is intended that all three of these projects will result in standards for hardcopy imaging equipment, and they should reflect consensus among PWG members. The three projects are not critically interdependent and will be voted on separately. Schedules outlined in the proposed charters may be affected by the personnel resources available and the other concurrent projects. Please review these charters and send comments to the WIMS reflector (wims@pwg.org). charter. We will discuss all received comments during the WIMS Face to Face meeting on May 24 in Webster, NY. The Last Calls will close on Wednesday, 8 June. Thank you, Bill Wagner, Chairman, WIMS/PMP -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ------=_NextPart_000_0029_01CC14D2.D7777680 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Sorry, Ir= a corrected me in that the last call duration must be 16 working days (mini= mum of 22 Calendar days). So last calls end on 8 June.

Thanks. Bill Wagner

 

From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org [mailto:pwg-announce-bounces@= pwg.org] On Behalf Of William Wagner
Sent: Tuesday, May 17= , 2011 5:27 PM
To: pwg-announce@pwg.org
Subject: [Pwg-A= nnounce] PWG Last Call - WIMS Projects Charters

=

 

All,

 

This is= the announcement of Last Calls for three Project Charters describing propo= sed WIMS (Imaging System Management) projects. The charter drafts are poste= d at:

 

MFD Alerts:<= o:p>

ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/wims/ch= arter/wd-mfdalerts-charter-20110515.pdf

 

Coherent MFD Management Interfaces: (CMMI):

ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/wims/charter/wd= -cmmi-charter-20110515.pdf

 <= /o:p>

DMTF/CIM Printer Profile:

=

ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/wims/charter/wd-cimp= rinterprofile-charter-20110515.pdf

 

These projects are being chartered, with the charters= to be submitted for formal PWG approval, to provide greater visibility for= and to solicit more PWG member participation in the generation of imaging = system  management specifications. It is intended that all three of th= ese projects will result in standards for hardcopy imaging equipment, and t= hey should reflect consensus among PWG members. The three projects are not = critically interdependent and will be voted on separately. Schedules outlin= ed in the proposed charters may  be affected by the personnel resource= s available and the other concurrent projects.

 = ;

Please review these charters <= /span>and send comments to the WIMS re= flector (wims@pwg.org).

charter.  We will discuss all= received comments during the WIMS Fac= e to Face meeting on May 24 in Webster, NY. The Last Calls will close on Wednesday, = 8 June.

<= /div>

 

Thank you,

=

 

Bill Wagner, Chai= rman, WIMS/PMP

 

 


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous co= ntent by MailScanner, a= nd is
believed to be clean.


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. ------=_NextPart_000_0029_01CC14D2.D7777680-- --===============0408475564== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pwg-announce mailing list pwg-announce@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/pwg-announce --===============0408475564==-- From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Tue May 17 18:25:38 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD3CE06D0 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 18:25:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JM6ygFclKVaH for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 18:25:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C6F3E0659 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 18:25:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E240279593; Tue, 17 May 2011 21:25:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from mail-out.apple.com (crispin.apple.com [17.151.62.50]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 498147952C for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 21:25:10 -0400 (EDT) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from relay15.apple.com ([17.128.113.54]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTP id <0LLD0004KALB4YB0@mail-out.apple.com> for ipp@pwg.org; Tue, 17 May 2011 18:25:10 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807136-b7c6bae000004a34-56-4dd31ff5d3d8 Received: from [17.151.75.104] (Unknown_Domain [17.151.75.104]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay15.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id E1.0A.18996.6FF13DD4; Tue, 17 May 2011 18:25:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Michael Sweet Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 18:25:09 -0700 To: ipp@pwg.org Message-id: <41E8910F-752A-437B-83F5-59E4733BC366@apple.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Subject: [IPP] Updated IPP Job and Printer Extensions - Set 3 (JPS3) posted X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: E240279593.A8376 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org All, I have uploaded an updated draft of the JPS3 spec at: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippjobprinterext3v10-20110517.docx ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippjobprinterext3v10-20110517.pdf ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippjobprinterext3v10-20110517-rev.pdf The -rev version has all of the previous changes we reviewed through section 5.5.14 accepted. There is significant new content. ________________________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Tue May 17 20:41:32 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06C78E0776 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 20:41:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NmNB1AZCcP9k for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 20:41:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E696E0717 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 20:41:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B41887957F; Tue, 17 May 2011 23:41:11 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from mail-out.apple.com (honeycrisp.apple.com [17.151.62.51]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD10F79597 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 23:40:57 -0400 (EDT) MIME-version: 1.0 Received: from relay16.apple.com ([17.128.113.55]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTP id <0LLD007TDGVMZE70@mail-out.apple.com> for ipp@pwg.org; Tue, 17 May 2011 20:40:57 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807137-b7cd4ae000003108-99-4dd33fc8ef92 Received: from [17.151.75.104] (Unknown_Domain [17.151.75.104]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay16.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 1C.D5.12552.8CF33DD4; Tue, 17 May 2011 20:40:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Michael Sweet In-reply-to: Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 20:40:55 -0700 Message-id: <2BC42EBE-C4B8-44E7-B187-3247A6DD20BD@apple.com> References: To: "Petrie, Glen" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: ipp@pwg.org Subject: [IPP] Re: PWG Raster comtinue X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2053616096==" Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: B41887957F.A80D4 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org --===============2053616096== Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_ruBRuU6OJzX5Fjl0FiOxkg)" --Boundary_(ID_ruBRuU6OJzX5Fjl0FiOxkg) Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT [Realized I hadn't responded to this one...] On Apr 26, 2011, at 4:05 PM, Petrie, Glen wrote: > Mike, > > We still seem to differ on the adding page number and flip/orientation. I hope we agree on adding the driver data fields to the PWG Raster. > > An unusual request: I would like to understand better the need for flip/orientation in a raster. Since I do not know who or what company may have requested the flip/orientation data, would it be possible for you to send an email to the individuals who requested the flip/orientation asking if they can state why they need the data and why they are not expecting the raster to be in the correct flip/orientation that the printer would need to print the specified print job. Glen, *I* added this because support for flip/rotate for duplex printing has been in CUPS for about 12 years now. I have used it for CUPS Raster drivers for that length of time in order to support shipping printers (back then a bunch of HP DeskJet printers) that didn't have enough memory to cache two sides of raster data and "do the right thing". The printer tells the client what to do for the back side images of duplex raster jobs, and the proposed additions to the page header allow the client to tell the printer what it generated. The printer can ignore it, error out (if the values are wrong), or fix it (again, if the values are wrong) as desired. ________________________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --Boundary_(ID_ruBRuU6OJzX5Fjl0FiOxkg) Content-type: text/html; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
[Realized I hadn't responded to this one...]

On Apr 26, 2011, at 4:05 PM, Petrie, Glen wrote:
Mike,
 
We still seem to differ on t= he adding page number and flip/orientation.   I hope we agree on = adding the driver data fields to the PWG Raster.
 
An unusual reque= st:  I would like to understand better the need for flip/orientation i= n a raster.    Since I do not know who or what company may h= ave requested the flip/orientation data, would it be possible for you to se= nd an email to the individuals who requested the flip/orientation asking if= they can state why they need the data and why they are not expecting the r= aster to be in the correct flip/orientation that the printer would need to = print the specified print job.

Glen, *I* added this because support for f= lip/rotate for duplex printing has been in CUPS for about 12 years now. I h= ave used it for CUPS Raster drivers for that length of time in order to sup= port shipping printers (back then a bunch of HP DeskJet printers) that didn= 't have enough memory to cache two sides of raster data and "do the right t= hing".

The printer tells the client what to do for= the back side images of duplex raster jobs, and the proposed additions to = the page header allow the client to tell the printer what it generated. The= printer can ignore it, error out (if the values are wrong), or fix it (aga= in, if the values are wrong) as desired.

_______________________________________________= _________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer= , PWG Chair


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --Boundary_(ID_ruBRuU6OJzX5Fjl0FiOxkg)-- --===============2053616096== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp --===============2053616096==-- From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Tue May 17 20:45:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB890E0795 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 20:45:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lrN492a38o2Y for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 20:45:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B51BEE0776 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 20:45:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAEEA7959F; Tue, 17 May 2011 23:45:13 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from mail-out.apple.com (mail-out.apple.com [17.151.62.51]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1133E794B0 for ; Tue, 17 May 2011 23:44:59 -0400 (EDT) MIME-version: 1.0 Received: from relay13.apple.com ([17.128.113.29]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPS id <0LLD000S8H2YZIN0@mail-out.apple.com> for ipp@pwg.org; Tue, 17 May 2011 20:44:59 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 1180711d-b7c70ae00000719a-4e-4dd340baa94c Received: from [17.151.75.104] (Unknown_Domain [17.151.75.104]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay13.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id BC.83.29082.BB043DD4; Tue, 17 May 2011 20:44:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Michael Sweet In-reply-to: Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 20:44:58 -0700 Message-id: <7C60EF8E-A5E7-4587-8B5D-C4F25D5CD2F7@apple.com> References: To: "Petrie, Glen" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: ipp@pwg.org Subject: [IPP] Re: PWG Raster comtinue X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0054833814==" Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: AAEEA7959F.A7C4D X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org --===============0054833814== Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_L8suPMWEZ17aKcjCaeqEjg)" --Boundary_(ID_L8suPMWEZ17aKcjCaeqEjg) Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT [Again, haven't been keeping up with my email...] On Apr 27, 2011, at 7:43 AM, Petrie, Glen wrote: > After thinking on it I decided I should explain in more detail my objection to flip/orientation specification in the raster in more detail. > > All printers should be able to consume (PWG) Raster but it more likely that most mid and higher end printer will consume PDF. It is also more likely that it will be lower end printers, those with limited resources, which will directly consume (PWG) Raster. Since by definition they have limited resources it would be burden to have these printers perform flip/orientation transforms that require very large buffers that would basically have to hold an entire page worth of raster data. That's why the header fields just tell the printer what transform was used by the client when they generated the image. The printer doesn't have to do anything with it - see my prior reply about this subject. I'll add some more explanatory text and examples to make this clearer. In the end, the transform fields would just be a check for the printer to know that it has what it needs. The printer doesn't have to support re-transforming the raster data - that would go against the primary goal of PWG Raster to support streaming. ________________________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --Boundary_(ID_L8suPMWEZ17aKcjCaeqEjg) Content-type: text/html; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable [Again, haven't been keeping up with my email...]

On Apr= 27, 2011, at 7:43 AM, Petrie, Glen wrote:
<= span class=3D"Apple-style-span" style=3D"border-collapse: separate; font-fa= mily: Helvetica; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: nor= mal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: = 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0p= x; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing:= 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: a= uto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: medium; ">
After thinking on it I decid= ed I should explain in more detail my objection to flip/orientation specifi= cation in the raster in more detail.
 
All printers should be able to consume (PWG) Ra= ster but it more likely that most mid and higher end printer will consume P= DF.  It is also more likely that it will be lower end printers, those = with limited resources, which will directly consume (PWG) Raster.  Sin= ce by definition they have limited resources it would be burden to have the= se printers perform flip/orientation transforms that require very large buf= fers that would basically have to hold an entire page worth of raster data.=

Tha= t's why the header fields just tell the printer what transform was used by = the client when they generated the image. The printer doesn't have to do an= ything with it - see my prior reply about this subject.

I'll add some more explanatory text and examples to make this clearer= . In the end, the transform fields would just be a check for the printer to= know that it has what it needs. The printer doesn't have to support re-tra= nsforming the raster data - that would go against the primary goal of PWG R= aster to support streaming.

_______________________________________________= _________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer= , PWG Chair


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --Boundary_(ID_L8suPMWEZ17aKcjCaeqEjg)-- --===============0054833814== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp --===============0054833814==-- From amin@kppk.gov.my Wed May 18 07:31:25 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A05EE067F for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 07:31:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -83.386 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-83.386 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_95=3, FH_HELO_EQ_D_D_D_D=1.597, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_DB=0.888, FM_DDDD_TIMES_2=1.999, GB_I_LETTER=-2, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2=4.395, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_XBL=3.033, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1, TVD_RCVD_IP=1.931, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1WMfJ-crfeoi for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 07:31:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 162-221-94-178.pool.ukrtel.net (162-221-94-178.pool.ukrtel.net [178.94.221.162]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40619E0669 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 07:31:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 178.94.221.162 (account HELO megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.3) with ESMTPA id 296223586 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 16:31:19 +0200 From: "Evette" To: Subject: Newsletter Wed, 18 May 2011 16:31:19 +0200 Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 16:31:19 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: kziw.73 Message-ID: <7581881121.PZKHRSN3593721@ygxgd.yuhwbbrkah.tv> Hey bud!! Do you want an improved future, step up in money earning, and brownie points? Special offer: We can assist with Diplomas from prestigious universities based on your present knowledge and work experience. Get a Degree in 6 weeks with our program! ~Our program will help ALL with professional experience get a 100% verified Degree: ~Doctorate ~Bachelors ~Masters - Just think about it... - Just follow YOUR Dreams! - Live a wonderful life by earning or upgrading your degree. This is a rare way to make a right move and receive your due benefits... if you are qualified but are lacking that piece of paper. Get one from us in a fraction of the time. Contact Us to start improving your life! ~CONTACT US~ 1-877-864-2612 Please leave us a message with your name and phone number with country code if outside USA and we'll call you as soon as possible. It's your move... Make the right move. Sincerely. Do Not Reply to this Email. We do not reply to text inquiries, and our server will reject all response traffic. We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused you. From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Thu May 19 16:17:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 314BAE0747 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 16:17:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WL9omgqDk+0n for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 16:17:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7502E06D3 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 16:17:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6EAC795A8; Thu, 19 May 2011 19:16:48 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from mail-out.apple.com (honeycrisp.apple.com [17.151.62.51]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55FCE79596; Thu, 19 May 2011 19:16:35 -0400 (EDT) MIME-version: 1.0 Received: from relay14.apple.com ([17.128.113.52]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPS id <0LLG002CPTZCMO31@mail-out.apple.com>; Thu, 19 May 2011 16:16:34 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807134-b7c00ae0000074fb-bf-4dd5a4c78537 Received: from [17.151.70.236] (Unknown_Domain [17.151.70.236]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay14.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id 00.7A.29947.8C4A5DD4; Thu, 19 May 2011 16:16:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Michael Sweet Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 16:16:23 -0700 To: ipp@pwg.org Message-id: <2840EA77-D99E-46F7-B290-B99310AC0F31@apple.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1229) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: cloud@pwg.org Subject: [IPP] Updated PWG Raster Sample Files and RasterView application X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1642409147==" Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: E6EAC795A8.A7A34 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org --===============1642409147== Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_Sikj9kdonB0yqIXVFlFKkg)" --Boundary_(ID_Sikj9kdonB0yqIXVFlFKkg) Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT All, I have uploaded new sample files that correct all of the reported issues to: ftp://ftp.easysw.com/pub/cups/examples/PWGRasterSamples-150dpi-20110518.zip ftp://ftp.easysw.com/pub/cups/examples/PWGRasterSamples-180dpi-20110518.zip As the filenames indicate, these are 150dpi and 180dpi collections. If there is sufficient interest (and a willing host) I can easily provide higher-resolution sample files as well. I also updated my RasterView application (v1.3) to specifically handle the newer colorspaces that the prior release did not cover. It can be downloaded from: http://www.easysw.com/~mike/rasterview/ __________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --Boundary_(ID_Sikj9kdonB0yqIXVFlFKkg) Content-type: text/html; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable All,

I = have uploaded new sample files that correct all of the reported issues to:<= /div>


As the filenames indicate, these are 150dpi = and 180dpi collections. If there is sufficient interest (and a willing host= ) I can easily provide higher-resolution sample files as well.
I also updated my RasterView application (v1.3) to specificall= y handle the newer colorspaces that the prior release did not cover.  = It can be downloaded from:

_______________________________________= ___________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, = PWG Chair


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. --Boundary_(ID_Sikj9kdonB0yqIXVFlFKkg)-- --===============1642409147== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp --===============1642409147==-- From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Fri May 20 08:31:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB023E0715 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 08:31:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2lbNfMmWAwnl for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 08:31:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29A13E0688 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 08:31:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18414795B9; Fri, 20 May 2011 11:30:46 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from QMTA11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.59.211]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F00C1795AD for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 11:30:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from omta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.60]) by QMTA11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id lrFC1g01Z1HzFnQ5BrWYuL; Fri, 20 May 2011 15:30:32 +0000 Received: from VistaBusiness ([24.61.240.234]) by omta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id lrWX1g012548CT43arWXoy; Fri, 20 May 2011 15:30:32 +0000 From: "William Wagner" To: "'Michael Sweet'" , References: <2840EA77-D99E-46F7-B290-B99310AC0F31@apple.com> In-Reply-To: <2840EA77-D99E-46F7-B290-B99310AC0F31@apple.com> Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 11:30:27 -0400 Message-ID: <003001cc1702$d8b38980$8a1a9c80$@net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcwWeuAwScpIBTo8TVyW+zWwopLzdQAh7PzA Content-Language: en-us X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Cc: cloud@pwg.org Subject: [IPP] RE: [Cloud] Updated PWG Raster Sample Files and RasterView application X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1283426467==" Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 18414795B9.A875B X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============1283426467== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0031_01CC16E1.51A1E980" Content-Language: en-us This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0031_01CC16E1.51A1E980 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thank you Michael. But the following addresses work better ftp://ftp.easysw.com/pub/cups/examples/PWGRasterSamples-150dpi-2011-05-18.zi p ftp://ftp.easysw.com/pub/cups/examples/PWGRasterSamples-180dpi-2011-05-18.zi p Bill Wagner From: cloud-bounces@pwg.org [mailto:cloud-bounces@pwg.org] On Behalf Of Michael Sweet Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 7:16 PM To: ipp@pwg.org Cc: cloud@pwg.org Subject: [Cloud] Updated PWG Raster Sample Files and RasterView application All, I have uploaded new sample files that correct all of the reported issues to: ftp://ftp.easysw.com/pub/cups/examples/PWGRasterSamples-150dpi-20110518.zip ftp://ftp.easysw.com/pub/cups/examples/PWGRasterSamples-180dpi-20110518.zip As the filenames indicate, these are 150dpi and 180dpi collections. If there is sufficient interest (and a willing host) I can easily provide higher-resolution sample files as well. I also updated my RasterView application (v1.3) to specifically handle the newer colorspaces that the prior release did not cover. It can be downloaded from: http://www.easysw.com/~mike/rasterview/ __________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ------=_NextPart_000_0031_01CC16E1.51A1E980 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thank you Michael. But the following  addresses work better=

 <= /p>

ftp://ftp.easysw.com/pub/cups/exampl= es/PWGRasterSamples-150dpi-2011-05-18.zip

ftp://ftp.easysw.com/pub/cups/examples/PWGRasterSample= s-180dpi-2011-05-18.zip=

 

Bill Wagner

From: cloud-bounces@pwg.org [mailto:cloud-bounces@p= wg.org] On Behalf Of Michael Sweet
Sent: Thursday, May 19,= 2011 7:16 PM
To: ipp@pwg.org
Cc: cloud@pwg.org
S= ubject: [Cloud] Updated PWG Raster Sample Files and RasterView applicat= ion

 =

All,

=  

I have uploaded new sample = files that correct all of the reported issues to:

=

 

 

________= __________________________________________

=

Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engi= neer, PWG Chair

=  


--
This message has been= scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. ------=_NextPart_000_0031_01CC16E1.51A1E980-- --===============1283426467== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp --===============1283426467==-- From pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Mon May 23 22:30:35 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3C9AE068D for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:30:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wlr4tHpbpEZK for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:30:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 072E7E0678 for ; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:30:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F11F67951E; Tue, 24 May 2011 01:30:19 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Delivered-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Received: from mail-out.apple.com (mail-out.apple.com [17.151.62.50]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD6AB79519 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 01:30:05 -0400 (EDT) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from relay15.apple.com ([17.128.113.54]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTP id <0LLO00C2APXX6LP1@mail-out.apple.com> for pwg-announce@pwg.org; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:30:04 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807136-b7c6bae000004a34-f1-4ddb4258ff0f Received: from [17.151.70.168] (Unknown_Domain [17.151.70.168]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay15.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id DE.B3.18996.B524BDD4; Mon, 23 May 2011 22:30:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Michael Sweet Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 01:30:00 -0400 To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Message-id: <90A21552-7CDB-4293-9DEE-45A75DA0D854@apple.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Subject: [Pwg-Announce] Slides and document for Use Case BOF X-BeenThere: pwg-announce@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Printer Working Group Announcement List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: F11F67951E.AC05B X-pwg-MailScanner-From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org All, I have posted the slides and document for the Use Case BOF at: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/general/slides/use-case-bof-may-11.pdf ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/generalwd/wd-commonusecases10-20110524.pdf These are also linked from the May 2011 F2F meeting page... ________________________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ pwg-announce mailing list pwg-announce@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/pwg-announce From ipp-afrika@supergewinne.de Tue May 24 08:45:29 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD4FE0671 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 08:45:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 4.778 X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.778 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_99=3.5, GB_ROLEX=5, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=1.778, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, SARE_SPEC_ROLEX=1.666, SARE_SPOOF_COM2COM=2.536, SARE_SPOOF_COM2OTH=2.536, SPOOF_COM2COM=2.272, SPOOF_COM2OTH=2.044, URIBL_AB_SURBL=10, URIBL_BLACK=20, URIBL_JP_SURBL=10, URIBL_RHS_DOB=1.083, URIBL_SBL=20, URIBL_SC_SURBL=10, URIBL_WS_SURBL=10, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9Nx2SO-ZWGa4 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 08:45:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from language.avenue.volia.net (language.avenue.volia.net [93.73.156.224]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C4BEFE0766 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 08:45:17 -0700 (PDT) From: ipp-archive@lists.ietf.org To: ipp-archive@lists.ietf.org Subject: ipp-archive@lists.ietf.org Rolex.com For You -76% MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20110524154517.C4BEFE0766@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 08:45:17 -0700 (PDT)

Dear ipp-archive@lists.ietf.org

WANTS TO SHARE SOMETHING WITH YOU

While exploring the Rolex.Com website, discovered this official Rolex address and thought you would be interested.

http://www.rolex.com;

and wanted to share it with you.

Thank you.

See you soon on Rolex.com

Rolex S.A. respects your right to privacy and is committed to maintaining your confidence and trust. Any information you provide us through our website will not be sold or rented.

Rolex S.A. does not collect any information from you without your knowledge and permission, and does not ask that you enter any personal information to access the website.

Information you provide Rolex S.A. is stored in a secure location and is accessible only by designated staff.

© Rolex SA, Geneva, Switzerland
From pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Tue May 24 14:40:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95AB1E069D for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 14:40:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OfUsXdtC9--y for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 14:40:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2D76E0670 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 14:40:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC19B79539; Tue, 24 May 2011 17:40:21 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Delivered-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Received: from mail-out.apple.com (mail-out.apple.com [17.151.62.51]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 158CE79535 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 17:40:09 -0400 (EDT) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from relay14.apple.com ([17.128.113.52]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPS id <0LLP00FTZYUUC3C0@mail-out.apple.com> for pwg-announce@pwg.org; Tue, 24 May 2011 14:40:07 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807134-b7c00ae0000074fb-c6-4ddc25af1641 Received: from [17.153.34.254] (Unknown_Domain [17.153.34.254]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay14.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id B1.18.29947.4B52CDD4; Tue, 24 May 2011 14:40:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Michael Sweet Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 17:39:58 -0400 To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Message-id: <13DE5F1A-EA9B-4498-8D7F-E02FEB666091@apple.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Subject: [Pwg-Announce] Minutes from the Use Case BOF Posted X-BeenThere: pwg-announce@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Printer Working Group Announcement List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: DC19B79539.ABBFF X-pwg-MailScanner-From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org All, I have posted the minutes from today's Use Case BOF at: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/general/minutes/use-case-bof-minutes-20110524.pdf We will continue discussion of use cases during the "shoot out" portions of tomorrow's Cloud Imaging and IPP Everywhere sessions. ________________________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ pwg-announce mailing list pwg-announce@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/pwg-announce From pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Tue May 24 16:58:15 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00C19E0754 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 16:58:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lC3eqqnyLaxq for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 16:58:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21386E06D7 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 16:58:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A27B79545; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:57:59 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Delivered-To: pwg-announce@pwg.org Received: from qmta10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.17]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5207A794B0 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 19:57:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from omta10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.28]) by qmta10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id nbvg1g0010cQ2SLAAbxm3i; Tue, 24 May 2011 23:57:46 +0000 Received: from WAMNotebook ([173.86.192.115]) by omta10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id nbxb1g0172VqgFh8WbxfQU; Tue, 24 May 2011 23:57:44 +0000 From: "William Wagner" To: References: In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 19:57:33 -0400 Message-ID: <004301cc1a6e$5e8a04d0$1b9e0e70$@net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: ActxSfGXChmJ5AudQDSBFCGl9D8bECpI/jSg Content-Language: en-us X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Subject: [Pwg-Announce] Minutes for PWG Plenary (24 May 2011) X-BeenThere: pwg-announce@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Printer Working Group Announcement List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0088735840==" Sender: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 7A27B79545.ACDA9 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: pwg-announce-bounces@pwg.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============0088735840== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0044_01CC1A4C.D7788BE0" Content-Language: en-us This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0044_01CC1A4C.D7788BE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, Minutes for the May 24 PWG Plenary are posted at: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/general/minutes/pwg_plenary_minutes_20110524.pdf and ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/general/minutes/pwg_plenary_minutes_20110524.docx Please send any corrections or additions to me. Thanks, Bill Wagner -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ------=_NextPart_000_0044_01CC1A4C.D7788BE0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

Minutes for the May 24 PWG Plenary are posted at:

ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/general/minutes/p= wg_plenary_minutes_20110524.pdf

= and

ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg= /general/minutes/pwg_plenary_minutes_20110524.docx

Please send any corrections= or additions to me.

 

Thanks,

 

Bill Wagner<= /span>


--=20
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean. ------=_NextPart_000_0044_01CC1A4C.D7788BE0-- --===============0088735840== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ pwg-announce mailing list pwg-announce@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/pwg-announce --===============0088735840==-- From 0-mhm@maty.fr Tue May 24 17:18:27 2011 Return-Path: <0-mhm@maty.fr> X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4B91E06EA; Tue, 24 May 2011 17:18:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -40.887 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-40.887 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_99=3.5, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619, RCVD_IN_XBL=3.033, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLACK=20, URIBL_JP_SURBL=10, URIBL_OB_SURBL=10, URIBL_WS_SURBL=10, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ypefbvae3JcB; Tue, 24 May 2011 17:18:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from telesp.net.br (201-27-181-247.dsl.telesp.net.br [201.27.181.247]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C248E064E; Tue, 24 May 2011 17:18:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 201.27.181.247 (account 0-reply@ctc-g.co.jp HELO kzmdroyfwgnvn.mjwloyozklsrue.net) by telesp.net.br (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.3) with ESMTPA id 394635100 for ip1394-archive@lists.ietf.org; Tue, 24 May 2011 21:18:26 -0300 From: , , To: , , Subject: hi Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 21:18:26 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: cpoqrt_96 Message-ID: <3379117302.PALR4NP8699708@ftpdwfre.lauyeumn.ua> hello! My name is Kate, im hot russian girl, from St. Peterburg. I like to internet meeting.(i find you mail in google) If you are interesting to chat, meet, change photos, hot webcam talk wit me please visit my page on site: www.datewoman.ru kisses From 0-ip.co.jp@magerr.combzmail.jp Wed May 25 01:07:33 2011 Return-Path: <0-ip.co.jp@magerr.combzmail.jp> X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F7DEE06B6; Wed, 25 May 2011 01:07:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.359 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.359 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_80=2, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_DB=0.888, HELO_DYNAMIC_SPLIT_IP=3.493, HELO_EQ_RU=0.595, HOST_EQ_RU=0.875, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, RCVD_IN_XBL=3.033, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1, TVD_RCVD_IP=1.931, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_AB_SURBL=10, URIBL_BLACK=20, URIBL_JP_SURBL=10, URIBL_OB_SURBL=10, URIBL_SC_SURBL=10, URIBL_WS_SURBL=10, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M555nN-Xx20o; Wed, 25 May 2011 01:07:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 200-112-175-119.bbt.net.ar (200-112-175-119.bbt.net.ar [200.112.175.119]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C203FE0664; Wed, 25 May 2011 01:07:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 200.112.175.119(helo=tqicfisulnvpgr.tdzhusmqxujmtuh.org) by 200-112-175-119.bbt.net.ar with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MM11Q-0126la-HP for ip1394-archive@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 25 May 2011 05:07:31 -0300 From: , To: , Subject: nice meet Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 05:07:31 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: mmzjt 71 Message-ID: <5316065617.2KQD8U35464820@bkmngvutic.medggbsu.com> hello! My name is Kate, im hot russian girl, from St. Peterburg. I like to internet meeting.(i find you mail in google) If you are interesting to chat, meet, change photos, hot webcam talk wit me please visit my page on site: www.datewoman.ru kisses From 0-uj@cancer.org Wed May 25 04:06:19 2011 Return-Path: <0-uj@cancer.org> X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6414AE06B5; Wed, 25 May 2011 04:06:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -18.701 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_95=3, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_EQ_RO=1.235, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619, RCVD_IN_XBL=3.033, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_AB_SURBL=10, URIBL_BLACK=20, URIBL_JP_SURBL=10, URIBL_OB_SURBL=10, URIBL_SC_SURBL=10, URIBL_WS_SURBL=10, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l6op5PXj8bdI; Wed, 25 May 2011 04:06:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server.koracell.ro (unknown [89.122.137.109]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0E37E0681; Wed, 25 May 2011 04:06:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 89.122.137.109 (account 0-2b@cancer.org HELO gzxhtnbvsl.lmgljsakt.biz) by server.koracell.ro (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.3) with ESMTPA id 489264507 for ip1394-archive@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 25 May 2011 13:06:16 +0200 From: , To: , Subject: Im Kate, wright me? Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 13:06:16 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: glmajwc_63 Message-ID: <0548596833.3EBW678S783428@atgwlzrnzqcsu.txisicwyxdz.info> hello! My name is Kate, im hot russian girl, from St. Peterburg. I like to internet meeting.(i find you mail in google) If you are interesting to chat, meet, change photos, hot webcam talk wit me please visit my page on site: www.datewoman.ru kisses From 0-rose@accomline.com Wed May 25 12:05:48 2011 Return-Path: <0-rose@accomline.com> X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82FEA130088; Wed, 25 May 2011 12:05:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -34.246 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-34.246 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_99=3.5, HELO_EQ_BR=0.955, HOST_EQ_BR=1.295, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_XBL=3.033, SARE_RECV_VIRTUACOMBR=1.193, SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS=2.912, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_AB_SURBL=10, URIBL_BLACK=20, URIBL_JP_SURBL=10, URIBL_SC_SURBL=10, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MiKuZLPdqY5K; Wed, 25 May 2011 12:05:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chello085216152102.chello.sk (chello085216152102.chello.sk [85.216.152.102]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3287F130087; Wed, 25 May 2011 12:05:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 85.216.152.102(helo=hscmiy.itmiv.biz) by chello085216152102.chello.sk with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MM9SA-5031ec-52 for ip1394-archive@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 25 May 2011 20:05:47 +0100 From: , To: , Subject: from kate Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 20:05:47 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: vebcjho-99 Message-ID: <9428121080.4Y7ZVV54596174@sfwtoxjt.lsgheujz.com> Hello! My name is Elza, im From Russia I like to internet meeting.(i find you mail in google) If you are interesting to chat, meet, change photos, hot webcam talk wit me please visit my page on site: www.russbabes.ru simle find "Elza" bye From 0-ka@playstation.sony.com Wed May 25 23:19:21 2011 Return-Path: <0-ka@playstation.sony.com> X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D38E0671; Wed, 25 May 2011 23:19:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -35.061 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-35.061 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_60=1, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_XBL=3.033, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_AB_SURBL=10, URIBL_BLACK=20, URIBL_JP_SURBL=10, URIBL_SC_SURBL=10, URIBL_WS_SURBL=10, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x-KhvXrtFyGJ; Wed, 25 May 2011 23:19:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sedcomcc-radio-rad.suceava.astral.ro (sedcomcc-radio-rad.suceava.astral.ro [83.103.150.90]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18A82E064B; Wed, 25 May 2011 23:19:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 83.103.150.90 (account 0-ncom.br@returns.groups.yahoo.com HELO umsvksp.zklggjpyainkxwg.ua) by sedcomcc-radio-rad.suceava.astral.ro (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.3) with ESMTPA id 004432798 for ip1394-archive@lists.ietf.org; Thu, 26 May 2011 08:19:20 +0200 From: , To: , Subject: nice meet Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 08:19:20 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: mynmzhytqy_99 Message-ID: <9096564289.22WB2BQ2326027@trfrvvelgtbpwx.srpavfwu.net> Hello! My name is Elza, im From Russia I like to internet meeting.(i find you mail in google) If you are interesting to chat, meet, change photos, hot webcam talk wit me please visit my page on site: www.russbabes.ru simle find "Elza" bye From 0-srao_li@sitc.com.cn Thu May 26 07:43:11 2011 Return-Path: <0-srao_li@sitc.com.cn> X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C59E0719 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 07:43:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -39.498 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-39.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_80=2, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, HOST_EQ_DIALUP=0.862, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.877, RCVD_IN_XBL=3.033, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1, URIBL_AB_SURBL=10, URIBL_BLACK=20, URIBL_JP_SURBL=10, URIBL_WS_SURBL=10, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6zzB-B-n5a9A for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 07:43:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ppp25410786184.ambra.ro (ppp25410786184.ambra.ro [86.107.254.184]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67835E0713 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 07:43:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 86.107.254.184 (account 0-jt@cancer.org HELO gmjsukopijivg.xfpdhxu.net) by ppp25410786184.ambra.ro (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.3) with ESMTPA id 555178483 for ipp-archive@lists.ietf.org; Thu, 26 May 2011 02:43:17 -1200 From: To: Subject: hello Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 02:43:17 -1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: sznzdpvbx-12 Message-ID: <6243527236.S8DBWA4G685134@fkprtqmhjonx.ebmpke.biz> Hello! My name is Elza, im From Russia I like to internet meeting.(i find you mail in google) If you are interesting to chat, meet, change photos, hot webcam talk wit me please visit my page on site: www.datebabes.ru simle find "Elza" bye From 0-16.txt@hanpin.com.tw Fri May 27 06:31:41 2011 Return-Path: <0-16.txt@hanpin.com.tw> X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63786E07E2; Fri, 27 May 2011 06:31:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -31.75 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-31.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HELO_EQ_BR=0.955, HOST_EQ_BR=1.295, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_XBL=3.033, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_AB_SURBL=10, URIBL_BLACK=20, URIBL_JP_SURBL=10, URIBL_SC_SURBL=10, URIBL_WS_SURBL=10, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f4RQcRDmKzRZ; Fri, 27 May 2011 06:31:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hol.gr (unknown [79.167.22.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07629E07DB; Fri, 27 May 2011 06:31:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 79.167.22.132 (account 0-4528-8376-7ensurich@ubu.ac.th HELO mywjhqemekqdaf.pybxvfaj.com) by hol.gr (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.3) with ESMTPA id 546054107 for idmr-archive@lists.ietf.org; Fri, 27 May 2011 15:31:40 +0200 From: , , , , To: , , , , Subject: Im Kate, wright me? Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 15:31:40 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: bymbta 45 Message-ID: <4011872188.S1P6U6PL936301@xbnpll.uwggui.com> Hello! My name is Elza, im From Russia I like to internet meeting.(i find you mail in google) If you are interesting to chat, meet, change photos, hot webcam talk wit me please visit my page on site: www.datebabes.ru simle find "Elza" bye From 0-ncom.br@returns.groups.yahoo.com Fri May 27 07:45:01 2011 Return-Path: <0-ncom.br@returns.groups.yahoo.com> X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B852DE06BC; Fri, 27 May 2011 07:45:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -28.5 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-28.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_99=3.5, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=2.426, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_XBL=3.033, RDNS_NONE=0.1, SORTED_RECIPS=1.125, URIBL_AB_SURBL=10, URIBL_BLACK=20, URIBL_JP_SURBL=10, URIBL_SC_SURBL=10, URIBL_WS_SURBL=10, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wv2y06SJ9kLM; Fri, 27 May 2011 07:45:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 2.124.111.190.linuxneuquen.com.ar (2.124.111.190.linuxneuquen.com.ar [190.111.124.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EB94E0664; Fri, 27 May 2011 07:45:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 190.111.124.2(helo=azhqgcofpar.yvjgt.biz) by 2.124.111.190.linuxneuquen.com.ar with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MMKQ4-9641nw-OX for ip1394-archive@lists.ietf.org; Fri, 27 May 2011 11:44:59 -0300 From: , To: , Subject: Im Kate, wright me? Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 11:44:59 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: qochczjkp 78 Message-ID: <3962661034.9T5T78EG024491@ygcscoa.oaamdhhcux.com> Hello! My name is Elza, im From Russia I like to internet meeting.(i find you mail in google) If you are interesting to chat, meet, change photos, hot webcam talk wit me please visit my page on site: www.datebabes.ru simle find "Elza" bye From 0-a@abf.ch Sat May 28 07:32:24 2011 Return-Path: <0-a@abf.ch> X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B6BE06ED; Sat, 28 May 2011 07:32:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -29.101 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-29.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_60=1, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_EQ_BR=0.955, HELO_MISMATCH_BR=2.4, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, RCVD_IN_XBL=3.033, RDNS_NONE=0.1, URIBL_AB_SURBL=10, URIBL_BLACK=20, URIBL_JP_SURBL=10, URIBL_SC_SURBL=10, URIBL_WS_SURBL=10, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VFl5GnMz5c87; Sat, 28 May 2011 07:32:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from host218.200-71-225.telecom.net.ar (host218.200-71-225.telecom.net.ar [200.71.225.218]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 577ADE06E3; Sat, 28 May 2011 07:32:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 200.71.225.218 (account 0-2-720097-1-hsnw_co_kr@mailer.godowon.com HELO dggvdioaq.dwrgjyd.net) by host218.200-71-225.telecom.net.ar (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.3) with ESMTPA id 967794083 for kink-archive@lists.ietf.org; Sat, 28 May 2011 15:32:23 +0100 From: , , , To: , , , Subject: hi Date: Sat, 28 May 2011 15:32:23 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: twez.12 Message-ID: <4547967235.ZZ9NJFY2698094@gsbjztrpfjueue.cawzhgijdtzgpb.biz> Hello! My name is Elza, im From Russia I like to internet meeting.(i find you mail in google) If you are interesting to chat, meet, change photos, hot webcam talk wit me please visit my page on site: www.datebabes.ru simle find "Elza" bye From 0-grafted@jerusalem.jp Sun May 29 14:36:59 2011 Return-Path: <0-grafted@jerusalem.jp> X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B370E0689; Sun, 29 May 2011 14:36:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.889 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.889 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_99=3.5, FH_HELO_EQ_D_D_D_D=1.597, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_DB=0.888, FM_DDDD_TIMES_2=1.999, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR2=4.395, HELO_EQ_BR=0.955, HOST_EQ_BR=1.295, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_XBL=3.033, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1, TVD_RCVD_IP=1.931, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_AB_SURBL=10, URIBL_BLACK=20, URIBL_JP_SURBL=10, URIBL_PH_SURBL=1.787, URIBL_SC_SURBL=10, URIBL_WS_SURBL=10, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9YYJ0Z5R9aVA; Sun, 29 May 2011 14:36:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 201-94-179-94.jau.flash.tv.br (201-94-179-94.jau.flash.tv.br [201.94.179.94]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B22AE0655; Sun, 29 May 2011 14:36:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 201.94.179.94 (account 0-rose@accomline.com HELO olxgsvxlwhns.qknlcfzywnjmr.tv) by 201-94-179-94.jau.flash.tv.br (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.3) with ESMTPA id 867274585 for ip1394-archive@lists.ietf.org; Sun, 29 May 2011 18:36:55 -0300 From: , To: , Subject: hello Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 18:36:55 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: kysbqxdjsq.00 Message-ID: <3898383036.S6ZHO0C5774859@exdcli.nxucxmbx.tv> Hello! My name is Elza, im From Russia I like to internet meeting.(i find you mail in google) If you are interesting to chat, meet, change photos, hot webcam talk wit me please visit my page on site: www.datebabes.ru simle find "Elza" bye From ipp-bounces@pwg.org Mon May 30 22:00:49 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipp-archive@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70CC6E0774 for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 22:00:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HwcuFCrmArCP for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 22:00:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (www.pwg.org [192.146.101.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15152E076F for ; Mon, 30 May 2011 22:00:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pwg.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 559F479481; Tue, 31 May 2011 01:00:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: ipp@pwg.org Delivered-To: ipp@pwg.org Received: from mail-out.apple.com (honeycrisp.apple.com [17.151.62.51]) by pwg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77CC179481 for ; Tue, 31 May 2011 01:00:06 -0400 (EDT) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from relay15.apple.com ([17.128.113.54]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTP id <0LM100DO2N81ZDU0@mail-out.apple.com> for ipp@pwg.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 22:00:06 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 11807136-b7c6bae000004a34-5b-4de475d52542 Received: from [17.151.74.189] (Unknown_Domain [17.151.74.189]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (AES128-SHA/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay15.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id BC.0D.18996.5D574ED4; Mon, 30 May 2011 22:00:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Michael Sweet Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 22:00:05 -0700 To: ipp@pwg.org Message-id: <1C29CD82-80D0-418F-BFB3-F5E0883AFAD8@apple.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-pwg-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean Subject: [IPP] Minutes from F2F posted X-BeenThere: ipp@pwg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Internet Printing Protocol \(current\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ipp-bounces@pwg.org Errors-To: ipp-bounces@pwg.org X-pwg-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pwg-MailScanner-ID: 559F479481.A7791 X-pwg-MailScanner-From: ipp-bounces@pwg.org All, I have posted the minutes from Wednesday's and Thursday's face-to-face meetings at: ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/minutes/ippv2-f2f-minutes-20110525.pdf ________________________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ ipp mailing list ipp@pwg.org https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp