Subject: [ippm] RE: Management requirements.

From: Victor Reijs <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 15:27:27 +0000

Hello Emile, 

Thanks for your draft document (nov. 2001). Just a few points: 
. I think OWDP is the old name; I assume it should mow be OWAMP.
. Please also have a look at the basic specification I foresee for a 
measurement infrastructure: 
http://www.dante.net/tf-ngn/D9.4v2.pdf (section 3.3) 
Most of them are covered by your proposal, but I think a few still need 
some more though, like:
  + explicitly mention that it is supporting passive and active 
measurements. Or do you think it only should support one of the two?
  + resource control; I think this is something the Management plane has
to 
control. Not only for 'accuracy' reasons but also for load reasons (and 
perhaps also 'oscillation' reason, see next point).
. is 'the sampling law' something that only the management requirements
needs to 
define? Is that also not something for the individual measurements to
take into account? 
So this is a shared issue.
. is a reference to NIMI also not helpful? 

Hope you can use the above comments. 

All the best, 

Victor
_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
[email-masked]
http://mailhost.advanced.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm