Subject: RE: [ippm] Synchonization state or type ?

From: "STEPHAN Emile FTRD/DAC/LAN" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 18:44:33 +0200

perhaps a state or a type of synchronisation 'localClock' permit to
differentiate such clock from others ?

emile

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : stanislav shalunov [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Envoye : mercredi 31 juillet 2002 17:42
> A : STEPHAN Emile FTRD/DAC/LAN
> Cc : [email-masked]
> Objet : Re: [ippm] Synchonization state: consistency among 
> owdp and ippm
> mib
> 
> 
> "STEPHAN Emile FTRD/DAC/LAN" 
> <[email-masked]> writes:
> 
> > Regarding the clock with "no notion of external 
> synchronization for the
> > time source (e.g., a cesium oscillator is used directly)" 
> what may be
> > the corresponding state ? 
> 
> Currently, draft-ietf-ippm-owdp-04.txt recommends to set the
> `synchronized' bit for sources of time that do not have a notion of
> synchronization -- so it would be the `synchronized(4)' state in your
> case.
> 
> (Maybe draft-ietf-ippm-owdp-04.txt needs to be changed in 
> this respect.)
> 
> -- 
> Stanislav Shalunov		http://www.internet2.edu/~shalunov/
> 
> This message is designed to be viewed at sea level.
> 

_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
[email-masked]
http://mailhost.advanced.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm