Subject: [ippm] Comments on draft-ietf-ippm-reordering-05.txt

From: Fabien Michaut <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 10:53:59 +0100

Dear Al,

I have two comments on the draft related to reordering:

1. On page 13, "Definition 2 : The degree of n-reordering of the sample 
is m/l" . It seams that m is not previously defined.
2. On page 14, What do you mean by adjacent? "1. n is a count of 
*adjacent* early packets." Is it always the case?  Consider the 
following example : In the arrival sequence s={1, 2, 3, 7, 9, 4, 5, 6, 
8}, packet 4 is n-reorderd with n=2, but packets 7 and 9 are not adjacent.

Best regards,

Fabien

_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
[email-masked] 
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm