From bclaise@cisco.com Mon Oct 10 08:15:00 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 489BB21F8C49; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:15:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.273 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.273 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.325, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12Da20Y48Vht; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:14:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F47021F8C36; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:14:59 -0700 (PDT) X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p9AFEtkt017146; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:14:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.60.67.84] (ams-bclaise-8913.cisco.com [10.60.67.84]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p9AFEpII017460; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:14:51 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E930BEB.3080208@cisco.com> Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:14:51 +0200 From: Benoit Claise User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "ipfix@ietf.org" , IETF IPPM WG References: <20111006001856.ACD1E98C28D@rfc-editor.org> In-Reply-To: <20111006001856.ACD1E98C28D@rfc-editor.org> X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20111006001856.ACD1E98C28D@rfc-editor.org> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030708040603010607060301" Subject: [ippm] Fwd: BCP 170, RFC 6390 on Guidelines for Considering New Performance Metric Development X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 15:15:00 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030708040603010607060301 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear all, This BCP would be of interest to both IPPM and IPFIX WGs Regards, Benoit. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: BCP 170, RFC 6390 on Guidelines for Considering New Performance Metric Development Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 17:18:56 -0700 (PDT) From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org CC: pmol@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. BCP 170 RFC 6390 Title: Guidelines for Considering New Performance Metric Development Author: A. Clark, B. Claise Status: Best Current Practice Stream: IETF Date: October 2011 Mailbox: alan.d.clark@telchemy.com, bclaise@cisco.com Pages: 23 Characters: 49930 See Also: BCP0170 I-D Tag: draft-ietf-pmol-metrics-framework-12.txt URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6390.txt This document describes a framework and a process for developing Performance Metrics of protocols and applications transported over IETF-specified protocols. These metrics can be used to characterize traffic on live networks and services. This memo documents an Internet Best Current Practice. This document is a product of the Performance Metrics for Other Layers Working Group of the IETF. BCP: This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html. For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html. Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC _______________________________________________ IETF-Announce mailing list IETF-Announce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce --------------030708040603010607060301 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear all,

This BCP would be of interest to both IPPM and IPFIX WGs

Regards, Benoit.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: BCP 170, RFC 6390 on Guidelines for Considering New Performance Metric Development
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 17:18:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
CC: pmol@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org 


A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        BCP 170        
        RFC 6390

        Title:      Guidelines for Considering New Performance 
                    Metric Development 
        Author:     A. Clark, B. Claise
        Status:     Best Current Practice
        Stream:     IETF
        Date:       October 2011
        Mailbox:    alan.d.clark@telchemy.com, 
                    bclaise@cisco.com
        Pages:      23
        Characters: 49930
        See Also:   BCP0170

        I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-pmol-metrics-framework-12.txt

        URL:        http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6390.txt

This document describes a framework and a process for developing
Performance Metrics of protocols and applications transported over
IETF-specified protocols.  These metrics can be used to characterize
traffic on live networks and services.  This memo documents an 
Internet Best Current Practice.

This document is a product of the Performance Metrics for Other Layers Working Group of the IETF.


BCP: This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the
Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for 
improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html.
For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC


_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
--------------030708040603010607060301-- From iesg-secretary@ietf.org Mon Oct 10 09:15:44 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 139D621F8AB8; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 09:15:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.537 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.537 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.062, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 944s5r9CJykH; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 09:15:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D20A21F84FC; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 09:15:43 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 3.60 Message-ID: <20111010161541.21273.55201.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 09:15:41 -0700 Cc: ippm@ietf.org Subject: [ippm] Last Call: (IPPM standard advancement testing) to Proposed Standard X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:15:44 -0000 The IESG has received a request from the IP Performance Metrics WG (ippm) to consider the following document: - 'IPPM standard advancement testing' as a Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2011-10-24. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract This document specifies tests to determine if multiple independent instantiations of a performance metric RFC have implemented the specifications in the same way. This is the performance metric equivalent of interoperability, required to advance RFCs along the standards track. Results from different implementations of metric RFCs will be collected under the same underlying network conditions and compared using state of the art statistical methods. The goal is an evaluation of the metric RFC itself, whether its definitions are clear and unambiguous to implementors and therefore a candidate for advancement on the IETF standards track. The file can be obtained via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-metrictest/ IESG discussion can be tracked via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-metrictest/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. From henk@uijterwaal.nl Wed Oct 12 05:01:43 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4757821F8B84 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 05:01:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.482 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.482 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.022, BAYES_00=-2.599, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=0.044, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KNH3mF+XCEwy for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 05:01:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8382321F8B75 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 05:01:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from geir.local (thuis.uijterwaal.nl [82.95.178.49]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p9CC18Al016814 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Oct 2011 14:01:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from henk@uijterwaal.nl) Message-ID: <4E9548DC.9050606@uijterwaal.nl> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:59:24 +0200 From: Henk Uijterwaal User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: IETF IPPM WG , Ionta Tiziano References: <885CC0380486234DBF486FA72FE9BE3BAAF3FE32E5@GRFMBX702BA020.griffon.local> In-Reply-To: <885CC0380486234DBF486FA72FE9BE3BAAF3FE32E5@GRFMBX702BA020.griffon.local> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.2 X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <885CC0380486234DBF486FA72FE9BE3BAAF3FE32E5@GRFMBX702BA020.griffon.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Subject: [ippm] Fwd: draft-ionta-new-multiparty-metrics-framework-00.txt X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:01:43 -0000 IPPM group, The author of this draft would like to have some feedback. If you are interested, please comment to the list. Henk -----Messaggio originale----- Da: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] Inviato: marted́ 11 ottobre 2011 18.10 A: Ionta Tiziano Oggetto: New Version Notification for draft-ionta-new-multiparty-metrics-framework-00.txt A new version of I-D, draft-ionta-new-multiparty-metrics-framework-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Tiziano Ionta and posted to the IETF repository. Filename: draft-ionta-new-multiparty-metrics-framework Revision: 00 Title: New Performance Metrics Composition Framework for Multiparty Services Creation date: 2011-10-11 WG ID: Individual Submission Number of pages: 14 Abstract: One of the best chances for a Service Provider to face the complex growth of IP Services, and their challenging requirements/SLAs along the Core network, is to enrich the current Performance metrics - mainly derived from a "Network-Oriented point of view", and therefore a general perspective, not focused on specific services - with some more Performance factors, so to include a "Service-Oriented point of view", more centred on the particular kind of service, with its own characteristics in terms of protocol, application, manageability, and so on. Almost nothing about this new approach has been standardized yet for the core network. To achieve the above goal, and starting from the one-to-group performance metrics outlined in RFC 5644 [RFC5644], a new metrics composition/aggregation framework is proposed in this memo, where the main focus is on multiparty communications (e.g. video providers, online biding, online stock market, etc.). Finally this memo is tuned to RFC 6390 [RFC6390] in terms of scopes, framework concepts, and need to widen the current performance metrics depending on the application, service etc. The IETF Secretariat Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. From wes@mti-systems.com Fri Oct 14 19:47:38 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBF7121F8CBC for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 19:47:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.555 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.555 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.555, BAYES_05=-1.11] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 419mTINJkb2g for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 19:47:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from omr15.networksolutionsemail.com (omr15.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.65]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD50E21F8BF8 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 19:47:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cm-omr5 (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50]) by omr15.networksolutionsemail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p9F2lWsE017984 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 22:47:34 -0400 Authentication-Results: cm-omr5 smtp.user=wes@mti-systems.com; auth=pass (PLAIN) X-Authenticated-UID: wes@mti-systems.com Received: from [174.130.89.114] ([174.130.89.114:29515] helo=[192.168.1.102]) by cm-omr5 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.41 r(31179/31189)) with ESMTPA id 04/6C-05349-444F89E4; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 22:47:32 -0400 Message-ID: <4E98F445.9040309@mti-systems.com> Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 22:47:33 -0400 From: Wesley Eddy Organization: MTI Systems User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ippm@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ippm-loss-episode-metrics@tools.ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [ippm] AD review of draft-ietf-ippm-loss-episode-metrics-02 X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 02:47:38 -0000 I've finished AD review of draft-ietf-ippm-loss-episode-metrics-02. It's generally in great shape, but there were a couple of things that I thought needed to be worked out in an update before bringing it to IETF LC and the IESG: (1) Section 3.6, 3.7, and 3.8 are empty. I would think these need to be at least minimally filled in with the relevant description or references to other sections, as applicable. (2) Section 8 (IPR Considerations) is helpful, however note that the tracker only shows a link to IPR ID #1354, and this section mentions #1009, #1010, and #1126; does this need to be explained somehow or more links added? This is bound to create some confusion and cause one or more DISCUSS ballots. Also, two editorial notes: (1) In section 1.2, "represent have" should just be "have". (2) In section 2.3, the last sentence shouldn't have "for" in it. Thanks for your efforts on this document; I think if the few minor points above can be resolved in an update that this will quickly go to IETF LC. -- Wes Eddy MTI Systems From gezihui@research.att.com Fri Oct 21 21:36:58 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C89DA1F0C60 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:36:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.602 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RFZFhLWtOfzz for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:36:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pink.research.att.com (mail-pink.research.att.com [192.20.225.111]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A3DA1F0C5A for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:36:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-green.research.att.com (unknown [135.207.178.10]) by mail-pink.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B533120E53 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 00:36:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from bigmail.research.att.com (bigmail.research.att.com [135.207.177.180]) by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71145841B for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 00:36:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.0.13] (vpn-49.research.att.com [135.207.102.49]) by bigmail.research.att.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id p9M4auuB024176 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 00:36:56 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.31.0.110725 Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 00:36:54 -0400 From: Zihui Ge To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Call for Participation - ACM CoNEXT 2011 - December 6-9, 2011. Tokyo, Japan Thread-Index: AcyQdDleZVVEfF1ItESH9FJbRf3UZQ== Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3402088616_1110216" Subject: [ippm] Call for Participation - ACM CoNEXT 2011 - December 6-9, 2011. Tokyo, Japan X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 04:36:58 -0000 > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --B_3402088616_1110216 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Call for Participation ACM CoNEXT 2011 December 6-9, 2011. Tokyo, Japan sponsored by ACM SIGCOMM Early registration for CoNEXT 2011 ends Monday, November 7 On behalf of the organizing committee, we are delighted to invite you to attend the Seventh ACM International Conference on emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies, to be held in Tokyo, Japan, December 6-9, 2011. CoNEXT is a premier forum for fostering scientific and technological exchanges between international research communities in networking. It encourages open discussions on technology alternatives and is a forum accommodating different viewpoints and research approaches. To improve interaction among participants, the conference is organized as a single-track event. The main conference will be preceded by two topical workshops (Workshop on Internet of Things and Service Platforms, Special Workshop on the Internet and Disasters), and the Student Workshop, where the next generation of researchers present their recent achievements in an open and informal environment. We are proud to hold CoNEXT for the first time in Asia, providing a good opportunity for the community to learn of unique Internet situations in Asia, and at the same time allow Asian researchers to participate in one of the best regarded conferences in the field. Travel and Registration information, as well as information on the technical program is available at http://conferences.sigcomm.org/co-next/2011/ We are looking forward to welcoming you to Tokyo to present and discuss the ideas that will shape the networks of the future. Kenjiro Cho & Mark Crovella Conference Chairs Constantine Dovrolis & Peter Key PC Chairs --B_3402088616_1110216 Content-type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Call for Participation - ACM CoNEXT 2011 - December 6-9, 2011. Tokyo= , Japan
            &nb= sp;          Call for Part= icipation
            &nb= sp;            &= nbsp;ACM CoNEXT 2011
            &nb= sp;      December 6-9, 2011. Tokyo, Japan
            &nb= sp;          sponsored by = ACM SIGCOMM

      Early registration for CoNEXT 2011 ends= Monday, November 7

On behalf of the organizing committee, we are delighted to invite you
to attend the Seventh ACM International Conference on emerging
Networking EXperiments and Technologies, to be held in Tokyo, Japan,
December 6-9, 2011.
CoNEXT is a premier forum for fostering scientific and technological
exchanges between international research communities in networking. It
encourages open discussions on technology alternatives and is a forum
accommodating different viewpoints and research approaches. To improve
interaction among participants, the conference is organized as a
single-track event.

The main conference will be preceded by two topical workshops
(Workshop on Internet of Things and Service Platforms, Special
Workshop on the Internet and Disasters), and the Student Workshop,
where the next generation of researchers present their recent
achievements in an open and informal environment.

We are proud to hold CoNEXT for the first time in Asia, providing a
good opportunity for the community to learn of unique Internet
situations in Asia, and at the same time allow Asian researchers to
participate in one of the best regarded conferences in the field.
Travel and Registration information, as well as information on the
technical program is available at
http://conferences.sigcomm.org/co-next/2011/

We are looking forward to welcoming you to Tokyo to present and
discuss the ideas that will shape the networks of the future.

            &nb= sp;            &= nbsp;       Kenjiro Cho & Mark Crovel= la
            &nb= sp;            &= nbsp;       Conference Chairs

            &nb= sp;            &= nbsp;       Constantine Dovrolis & Pe= ter Key
            &nb= sp;            &= nbsp;       PC Chairs



 --B_3402088616_1110216-- From internet-drafts@ietf.org Mon Oct 24 07:57:53 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04B7E21F8CA6; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 07:57:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.572 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.572 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.027, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w6wA-JVSR64k; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 07:57:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7178821F8C8F; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 07:57:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 3.61 Message-ID: <20111024145752.6243.36234.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 07:57:52 -0700 Cc: ippm@ietf.org Subject: [ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2679-00.txt X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 14:57:53 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the IP Performance Metrics Working Group = of the IETF. Title : Test Plan and Results for Advancing RFC 2679 on the Stan= dards Track Author(s) : Len Ciavattone Ruediger Geib Al Morton Matthias Wieser Filename : draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2679-00.txt Pages : 27 Date : 2011-10-21 This memo proposes to advance a performance metric RFC along the standards track, specifically RFC 2679 on One-way Delay Metrics. Observing that the metric definitions themselves should be the primary focus rather than the implementations of metrics, this memo describes the test procedures to evaluate specific metric requirement clauses to determine if the requirement has been interpreted and implemented as intended. Two completely independent implementations have been tested against the key specifications of RFC 2679. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2679-00.txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ippm-testplan-rfc2679-00.txt From internet-drafts@ietf.org Mon Oct 24 11:51:20 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A737411E80CE; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:51:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.576 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.576 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.023, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VHL4mEaoyZnw; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:51:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B1A711E80C7; Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:51:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 3.61 Message-ID: <20111024185120.1973.49466.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:51:20 -0700 Cc: ippm@ietf.org Subject: [ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-metrictest-04.txt X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 18:51:20 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the IP Performance Metrics Working Group = of the IETF. Title : IPPM standard advancement testing Author(s) : Ruediger Geib Al Morton Reza Fardid Alexander Steinmitz Filename : draft-ietf-ippm-metrictest-04.txt Pages : 39 Date : 2011-10-24 This document specifies tests to determine if multiple independent instantiations of a performance metric RFC have implemented the specifications in the same way. This is the performance metric equivalent of interoperability, required to advance RFCs along the standards track. Results from different implementations of metric RFCs will be collected under the same underlying network conditions and compared using state of the art statistical methods. The goal is an evaluation of the metric RFC itself, whether its definitions are clear and unambiguous to implementors and therefore a candidate for advancement on the IETF standards track. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ippm-metrictest-04.txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ippm-metrictest-04.txt From internet-drafts@ietf.org Thu Oct 27 12:00:05 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B23111E8081; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:00:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.582 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.582 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.017, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7lx0yT-wWJpL; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:00:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C94E321F8B88; Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:00:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 3.62 Message-ID: <20111027190004.13896.97798.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:00:04 -0700 Cc: ippm@ietf.org Subject: [ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-loss-episode-metrics-03.txt X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 19:00:05 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the IP Performance Metrics Working Group = of the IETF. Title : Loss Episode Metrics for IPPM Author(s) : Nick Duffield Al Morton Joel Sommers Filename : draft-ietf-ippm-loss-episode-metrics-03.txt Pages : 22 Date : 2011-10-27 The IETF has developed a one way packet loss metric that measures the loss rate on a Poisson probe stream between two hosts. However, the impact of packet loss on applications is in general sensitive not just to the average loss rate, but also to the way in which packet losses are distributed in loss episodes (i.e., maximal sets of consecutively lost probe packets). This draft defines one-way packet loss episode metrics, specifically the frequency and average duration of loss episodes, and a probing methodology under which the loss episode metrics are to be measured. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ippm-loss-episode-metrics-03= .txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ippm-loss-episode-metrics-03.= txt From dgenin@nist.gov Mon Oct 31 13:54:21 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 303DD11E8279 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:54:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N41fLIqibMn5 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:54:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.nist.gov (rimp1.nist.gov [129.6.16.226]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 719B811E817E for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:54:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (114-140.antd.nist.gov [129.6.140.114]) by smtp.nist.gov (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p9VKs0kn017068 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:54:02 -0400 Message-ID: <4EAF0AE8.2040708@nist.gov> Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:54:00 -0400 From: Daniel Genin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ippm@ietf.org References: <20111027190004.13896.97798.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20111027190004.13896.97798.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-NIST-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-NIST-MailScanner-From: dgenin@nist.gov Subject: Re: [ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-loss-episode-metrics-03.txt X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 20:54:21 -0000 Hello, I am assuming that anyone is welcome to submit comments on the above draft. Line 327 "geometric distributed" should be "geometrically distributed", I believe. Line 494 "results is" should be "results in" Line 545 "which to select" should be "wish to select" Line 580 "is a follows" should be "is as follows" Line 632 "for each ..." beginning the paragraph should be capitalized. Line 706 "proto metric" should be "proto-metric" Line 732 In mathematics it is customary to use { and } to enclose sets rather than ( and ); is the latter notation also standard? Line 738 "L1,,,,,Ln" should be "L1,...,Ln" (maybe?) Line 748 see line 738 comment Line 751 The first parenthesis in the formula is unmatched Line 764 see line 738 comment Section 5.3 It would be nice to include a plain-english explanation of what the bi-packet-loss-episode-duration-number proto-metric is supposed to measure. Trying to infer its intended meaning from the formula in 5.3 is difficult. What is the significance of the factor of 2 in the definition? The meaning of the ratio is also not immediately clear. Line 768 The denominator of the formula, which according to the text above is the bi-packet-loss-episode-duration-number differs from its definition in the previous section. The bracketing also leaves it unclear whether n divides the whole fraction or only the denominator; the former would be the correct interpretation. One other thing, does the precision of the time stamping/measuring mechanism need to be specified for completeness? Hope this helps. Best regards, Daniel Genin On 10/27/2011 3:00 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the IP Performance Metrics Working Group of the IETF. > > Title : Loss Episode Metrics for IPPM > Author(s) : Nick Duffield > Al Morton > Joel Sommers > Filename : draft-ietf-ippm-loss-episode-metrics-03.txt > Pages : 22 > Date : 2011-10-27 > > The IETF has developed a one way packet loss metric that measures the > loss rate on a Poisson probe stream between two hosts. However, the > impact of packet loss on applications is in general sensitive not > just to the average loss rate, but also to the way in which packet > losses are distributed in loss episodes (i.e., maximal sets of > consecutively lost probe packets). This draft defines one-way packet > loss episode metrics, specifically the frequency and average duration > of loss episodes, and a probing methodology under which the loss > episode metrics are to be measured. > > > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ippm-loss-episode-metrics-03.txt > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ippm-loss-episode-metrics-03.txt > _______________________________________________ > ippm mailing list > ippm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm > . >