From iesg-secretary@ietf.org Thu Jun 6 11:41:29 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7E6C21E809F; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 11:41:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.452 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.452 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.148, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dw59jKIBDlPr; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 11:41:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09CB621F9446; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 11:41:29 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.50 Message-ID: <20130606184128.29973.68268.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 11:41:28 -0700 Cc: ippm WG Subject: [ippm] WG Review: IP Performance Metrics (ippm) X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 18:41:29 -0000 The IP Performance Metrics (ippm) working group in the Transport Area of the IETF is undergoing rechartering. The IESG has not made any determination yet. The following draft charter was submitted, and is provided for informational purposes only. Please send your comments to the IESG mailing list (iesg at ietf.org) by 2013-06-13. IP Performance Metrics (ippm) ------------------------------------------------ Current Status: Active WG Chairs: Brian Trammell Bill Cerveny Assigned Area Director: Spencer Dawkins Mailing list Address: ippm@ietf.org To Subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ippm/ Charter: The IP Performance Metrics (IPPM) Working Group develops and maintains standard metrics that can be applied to the quality, performance, and reliability of Internet data delivery services and applications running over transport layer protocols (e.g. TCP, UDP) over IP. Direct measurement of raw network- or lower-layer protocols, such as OAM based performance measurement, is out of scope for IPPM. It also develops and maintains protocols for the measurement of these metrics. These metrics are designed such that they can be used by network operators, end users, or independent testing groups. Metrics developed by the IPPM WG are intended to provide unbiased quantitative performance measurements and not a value judgement. The IPPM WG has produced documents that define specific metrics and procedures for accurately measuring and documenting these metrics. The working group will continue advancing the most useful of these metrics along the standards track, using the guidelines stated in RFC 6576. To the extent possible, these metrics will be used as the basis for future work on metrics in the WG. The WG will seek to develop new metrics and models to more accurately characterize the network paths under test and/or the performance of transport and application layer protocols on these paths. The WG will balance the need for new metrics with the desire to minimize the introduction of new metrics, and will require that new metric definitions state how the definition improves on an existing metric definition, or assesses a property of network performance not previously covered by a defined metric. Metric definitions will follow the template given in RFC 6390. It is possible that new measurement protocols will be needed to support new metrics; if this is the case, the working group will be rechartered to develop these protocols. Additional methods will be defined for the composition and calibration of IPPM-defined metrics, as well as active, passive and hybrid measurement methods for these metrics. In addition, the WG encourages work which describes the applicability of metrics and measurement methods, especially to improve understanding of the tradeoffs involved among active, passive, and hybrid methods. The WG may update its core framework RFC 2330 as necessary to accommodate these activities. The WG has produced protocols for communication among test equipment to enable the measurement of the one- and two-way metrics (OWAMP and TWAMP respectively). These protocols will be advanced along the standards track. The work of the WG will take into account the suitability of measurements for automation, in order to support large-scale measurement efforts. This may result in further developments in protocols such as OWAMP and TWAMP. Agreement about the definitions of metrics and methods of measurement enables accurate, reproducible, and equivalent results across different implementations. To this end, the WG will define and maintain a registry of metric definitions. The WG encourages work which assesses the comparability of measurements of IPPM metrics with metrics developed elsewhere. The WG also encourages work which improves the availability of information about the context in which measurements were taken. The IPPM WG seeks cooperation with other appropriate standards bodies and forums to promote consistent approaches and metrics. Within the IETF process, IPPM metric definitions and measurement protocols will be subject to as rigorous a scrutiny for usefulness, clarity, and accuracy as other protocol standards. The IPPM WG will interact with other areas of IETF activity whose scope intersects with the requirement of these specific metrics. The WG will, on request, provide input to other IETF working groups on the use and implementation of these metrics. Specific near-term milestones include: 1. Advancement of protocols for one- and two-way metrics (OWAMP and TWAMP respectively) along the standards track. 2. Update of the IPPM framework document (RFC 2330) to reflect experience with the framework, and to cover planned future metric development. 3. Definition of a registry of metric definitions to improve the equivalency of metric results across multiple implementations. 4. Publication of a rate measurement problem statement. 5. Publication of documents supporting the use of IPSec to protect OWAMP / TWAMP. 6. Publication of documents related to model-based TCP bulk transfer capacity metrics. Milestones: TBD From trammell@tik.ee.ethz.ch Fri Jun 7 04:34:28 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EF7F21F941D for ; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 04:34:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FMSXwJbAQA8l for ; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 04:34:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.ee.ethz.ch (smtp.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.219]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E5121F9402 for ; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 04:34:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id B95EBD9305 for ; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 13:34:20 +0200 (MEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new on smtp.ee.ethz.ch Received: from smtp.ee.ethz.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.ee.ethz.ch [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id DNpHeUy52N2c for ; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 13:34:20 +0200 (MEST) Received: from pb-10243.ethz.ch (pb-10243.ethz.ch [82.130.102.152]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: briant) by smtp.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8BC4CD9304 for ; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 13:34:20 +0200 (MEST) From: Brian Trammell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 13:34:19 +0200 Message-Id: To: ippm@ietf.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) Subject: [ippm] Rechartering and Next Steps X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 11:34:28 -0000 Greetings, all, As you've seen, the charter we put together in Orlando is now out of = IESG review, and external review comments will be accepted until next = Thursday, June 13th. As a result of IESG comments, there were minor = clarifications made to the WG's scope. In my opinion, these are = compatible with the charter draft for which there was clear working = group consensus, but please verify the changes to the charter to ensure = you agree.=20 We'd like to ask document authors of those documents for which there was = consensus for adoption to continue developing those drafts as individual = drafts: draft-morton-ippm-2330-update draft-morton-ippm-lmap-path draft-mathis-ippm-model-based-metrics draft-bi-ippm-ipsec I suspect we'll have an approved charter before July 8 (the -00 deadline = for Berlin); if so, we'll ask document authors to submit WG versions of = their documents at that time. I presume that each of these (as well as our two current WG drafts) will = have progress to report and discuss in Berlin; please contact the chairs = at ippm-chairs@tools.ietf.org to arrange an agenda slot at our meeting. Best regards, Brian= From giuseppe.aceto@unina.it Mon Jun 10 09:35:12 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40F0621F962A for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 09:35:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.309 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.309 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.463, BAYES_05=-1.11, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS=2.077] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F9ynXa9sO0bR for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 09:35:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp2.unina.it (smtp2.unina.it [192.132.34.62]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 549F221F8B98 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 09:35:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [143.225.229.169] ([143.225.229.169]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp2.unina.it (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5AGZ0Ft023507 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 10 Jun 2013 18:35:01 +0200 Message-ID: <51B6006F.2050309@unina.it> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 18:35:59 +0200 From: Giuseppe Aceto User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ippm@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [ippm] CFP IEEE M&N 2013 X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 16:35:12 -0000 **** Apologies if you receive multiple copies **** ===================================================================== CALL FOR PAPER - Extended abstract due: June 20,2013 IEEE International Workshop on "Measurements & Networking" (M&N 2013) Naples, Italy | October 7-8, 2013 http://mn2013.ieee-ims.org/ I&M, IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Society ===================================================================== Following the success of the first edition, the 2nd IEEE International Workshop M&N 2013 aims to represent a forum for researchers and practitioners from industry, academia, and government interested in the areas of measurements, communications, computer science, wireless systems, sensor networks and to foster discussion on the role of both measurements for networking and networking for measurements. The workshop will provide the opportunity to gather complementary competencies from different fields, and discuss recent results and trends on related highly interdisciplinary topics: Authors are invited to submit extended abstracts (3-4 pages) reporting original research of theoretical or applied nature using on-line submission system. Guidelines for the authors are reported on the workshop website. TOPICS: QoS measurement and performance assessment * Methods and techniques for performance assessment in networks * Protocol analysis * Traffic analysis and monitoring * Cross-layer measurements * Error management and troubleshooting in networks Security measurements * Coexistence and interference problems in wireless networks * Signal integrity problems * Anomaly detection and classification * Models and measurements for dependability assessment Measurements on network infrastructures * Characterization of network equipment * In-service testing * Out-of-service measurements * Conformance and interoperability testing * Load tests Wireless Sensors Networks (WSN) * Modeling and performance prediction * Design and implementation * Measurements for characterization and performance assessment * Synchronization issues GRID and distributed measurements * GRID architecture for measurements * Distributed measurement systems The workshop has also two Special sessions on: - Dependability and security measurements in computer systems and networks (organized by Andrea Bondavalli, Univ. Florence and Marco Vieira, Univ. Coimbra) - Sensor Networks for Ambient Assisted Living (organized by Buno Ando', Univ. Catania) Accepted Papers will be included in the IEEE Xplore digital library and indexed by EI/Compendex. IMPORTANT: A Special Issue of the IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurements is connected to the workshop. Accepted papers will be included in the Workshop Proceedings published by IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Society, and distributed at the workshop. =================================================================== GENERAL CHAIRMAN Leopoldo Angrisani, University of Naples Federico II GENERAL CO-CHAIRMEN Kim Fowler, Kansas State University Claudio Narduzzi, University of Padova TECHNICAL PROGRAM CHAIRPERSONS Angela Sara Cacciapuoti, University of Naples Federico II Antonio Pescape', University of Naples Federico II Michele Vadursi, University of Naples "Parthenope" =================================================================== Important Deadlines: -------------------- - Extended abstract submission June 20th - Acceptance notification July 20th - Full paper due September 7th FOR MORE INFORMATION VISIT http://mn2013.ieee-ims.org/ PAPER SUBMISSION: https://edas.info/newPaper.php?c=13155 From iesg-secretary@ietf.org Fri Jun 14 08:52:11 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41A3221F9CD7; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 08:52:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.517 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.517 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.083, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kvXJ6rDVQbFK; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 08:52:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 900BE21F9CDA; Fri, 14 Jun 2013 08:52:10 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.51.p2 Message-ID: <20130614155210.21513.89428.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 08:52:10 -0700 Cc: ippm WG Subject: [ippm] WG Action: Rechartered IP Performance Metrics (ippm) X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 15:52:11 -0000 The IP Performance Metrics (ippm) working group in the Transport Area of the IETF has been rechartered. For additional information please contact the Area Directors or the WG Chairs. IP Performance Metrics (ippm) ------------------------------------------------ Current Status: Active WG Chairs: Brian Trammell Bill Cerveny Assigned Area Director: Spencer Dawkins Mailing list Address: ippm@ietf.org To Subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ippm/ Charter: The IP Performance Metrics (IPPM) Working Group develops and maintains standard metrics that can be applied to the quality, performance, and reliability of Internet data delivery services and applications running over transport layer protocols (e.g. TCP, UDP) over IP. Specifying network or lower layer OAM mechanisms is out of scope of the IPPM charter. It also develops and maintains protocols for the measurement of these metrics. These metrics are designed such that they can be used by network operators, end users, or independent testing groups. Metrics developed by the IPPM WG are intended to provide unbiased quantitative performance measurements and not a value judgement. The IPPM WG has produced documents that define specific metrics and procedures for accurately measuring and documenting these metrics. The working group will continue advancing the most useful of these metrics along the standards track, using the guidelines stated in RFC 6576. To the extent possible, these metrics will be used as the basis for future work on metrics in the WG. The WG will seek to develop new metrics and models to more accurately characterize the network paths under test and/or the performance of transport and application layer protocols on these paths. The WG will balance the need for new metrics with the desire to minimize the introduction of new metrics, and will require that new metric definitions state how the definition improves on an existing metric definition, or assesses a property of network performance not previously covered by a defined metric. Metric definitions will follow the template given in RFC 6390. It is possible that new measurement protocols will be needed to support new metrics; if this is the case, the working group will be rechartered to develop these protocols. Additional methods will be defined for the composition and calibration of IPPM-defined metrics, as well as active, passive and hybrid measurement methods for these metrics. In addition, the WG encourages work which describes the applicability of metrics and measurement methods, especially to improve understanding of the tradeoffs involved among active, passive, and hybrid methods. The WG may update its core framework RFC 2330 as necessary to accommodate these activities. The WG has produced protocols for communication among test equipment to enable the measurement of the one- and two-way metrics (OWAMP and TWAMP respectively). These protocols will be advanced along the standards track. The work of the WG will take into account the suitability of measurements for automation, in order to support large-scale measurement efforts. This may result in further developments in protocols such as OWAMP and TWAMP. Agreement about the definitions of metrics and methods of measurement enables accurate, reproducible, and equivalent results across different implementations. To this end, the WG will define and maintain a registry of metric definitions. The WG encourages work which assesses the comparability of measurements of IPPM metrics with metrics developed elsewhere. The WG also encourages work which improves the availability of information about the context in which measurements were taken. The IPPM WG seeks cooperation with other appropriate standards bodies and forums to promote consistent approaches and metrics. Within the IETF process, IPPM metric definitions and measurement protocols will be subject to as rigorous a scrutiny for usefulness, clarity, and accuracy as other protocol standards. The IPPM WG will interact with other areas of IETF activity whose scope intersects with the requirement of these specific metrics. The WG will, on request, provide input to other IETF working groups on the use and implementation of these metrics. Specific near-term milestones include: 1. Advancement of protocols for one- and two-way metrics (OWAMP and TWAMP respectively) along the standards track. 2. Update of the IPPM framework document (RFC 2330) to reflect experience with the framework, and to cover planned future metric development. 3. Definition of a registry of metric definitions to improve the equivalency of metric results across multiple implementations. 4. Publication of a rate measurement problem statement. 5. Publication of documents supporting the use of IPSec to protect OWAMP/TWAMP. 6. Publication of documents related to model-based TCP bulk transfer capacity metrics. Milestones: Jul 2013 - Submit draft on RFC 2680 standards-track advancement testing to IESG as Informational Dec 2013 - Submit draft on access rate measurement protocol problem statement to IESG as Informational Dec 2013 - Submit draft updating the IPPM Framework (2330-update) to IESG as Proposed Standard Dec 2013 - Submit draft on reference path for measurement location to IESG as Informational Dec 2013 - Submit draft on OWAMP / TWAMP Security to IESG as Proposed Standard Mar 2014 - Submit draft on model-based TCP bulk transfer capacity metrics to IESG as Experimental From trammell@tik.ee.ethz.ch Sat Jun 15 05:01:50 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1865A21F8AD5 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 05:01:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mowzn4CZ-beO for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 05:01:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.ee.ethz.ch (smtp.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.219]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A349221F9C90 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 05:01:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79F3DD930A for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 14:01:23 +0200 (MEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new on smtp.ee.ethz.ch Received: from smtp.ee.ethz.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.ee.ethz.ch [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 118+cGR5G0Xy for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 14:01:23 +0200 (MEST) Received: from [10.0.27.100] (cust-integra-122-165.antanet.ch [80.75.122.165]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: briant) by smtp.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3806BD9308 for ; Sat, 15 Jun 2013 14:01:23 +0200 (MEST) From: Brian Trammell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 14:01:21 +0200 References: <20130614155210.21513.89428.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> To: "ippm@ietf.org" Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) Subject: [ippm] Fwd: WG Action: Rechartered IP Performance Metrics (ippm) X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 12:01:50 -0000 Greetings, all, Good news: our charter has been approved! Authors of drafts with milestones on the current charter: draft-morton-ippm-2330-update draft-morton-ippm-lmap-path draft-mathis-ippm-model-based-metrics draft-bi-ippm-ipsec please be prepared to submit WG -00 versions of these documents before = the Berlin deadline (8 July): draft-ietf-ippm-2330-update draft-ietf-ippm-lmap-path draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics draft-ietf-ippm-ipsec These drafts have been pre-approved for submission as WG drafts in the = datatracker. If you'd like a different draft name, please let me know. Cheers, Brian Begin forwarded message: > From: The IESG > Subject: [ippm] WG Action: Rechartered IP Performance Metrics (ippm) > Date: June 14, 2013 5:52:10 PM GMT+02:00 > To: IETF-Announce > Cc: ippm WG >=20 > The IP Performance Metrics (ippm) working group in the Transport Area = of > the IETF has been rechartered. For additional information please = contact > the Area Directors or the WG Chairs. >=20 > IP Performance Metrics (ippm) > ------------------------------------------------ > Current Status: Active WG >=20 > Chairs: > Brian Trammell > Bill Cerveny >=20 > Assigned Area Director: > Spencer Dawkins >=20 > Mailing list > Address: ippm@ietf.org > To Subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm > Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ippm/ >=20 > Charter: >=20 > The IP Performance Metrics (IPPM) Working Group develops and maintains > standard metrics that can be applied to the quality, performance, and > reliability of Internet data delivery services and applications = running > over transport layer protocols (e.g. TCP, UDP) over IP. Specifying > network or lower layer OAM mechanisms is out of scope of the IPPM=20 > charter. It also develops and maintains protocols for the measurement=20= > of these metrics. These metrics are designed such that they can be = used=20 > by network operators, end users, or independent testing groups. = Metrics=20 > developed by the IPPM WG are intended to provide unbiased quantitative=20= > performance measurements and not a value judgement. >=20 > The IPPM WG has produced documents that define specific metrics and > procedures for accurately measuring and documenting these metrics. The > working group will continue advancing the most useful of these metrics > along the standards track, using the guidelines stated in RFC 6576. To > the extent possible, these metrics will be used as the basis for = future=20 > work on metrics in the WG. >=20 > The WG will seek to develop new metrics and models to more accurately > characterize the network paths under test and/or the performance of > transport and application layer protocols on these paths. The WG will > balance the need for new metrics with the desire to minimize the > introduction of new metrics, and will require that new metric=20 > definitions state how the definition improves on an existing metric=20 > definition, or assesses a property of network performance not = previously=20 > covered by a defined metric. Metric definitions will follow the = template=20 > given in RFC 6390. It is possible that new measurement protocols will = be=20 > needed to support new metrics; if this is the case, the working group=20= > will be rechartered to develop these protocols. >=20 > Additional methods will be defined for the composition and calibration=20= > of IPPM-defined metrics, as well as active, passive and hybrid=20 > measurement methods for these metrics. In addition, the WG encourages=20= > work which describes the applicability of metrics and measurement=20 > methods, especially to improve understanding of the tradeoffs involved=20= > among active, passive, and hybrid methods. >=20 > The WG may update its core framework RFC 2330 as necessary to=20 > accommodate these activities. >=20 > The WG has produced protocols for communication among test equipment = to > enable the measurement of the one- and two-way metrics (OWAMP and = TWAMP > respectively). These protocols will be advanced along the standards > track. The work of the WG will take into account the suitability of=20 > measurements for automation, in order to support large-scale = measurement=20 > efforts. This may result in further developments in protocols such as=20= > OWAMP and TWAMP. >=20 > Agreement about the definitions of metrics and methods of measurement > enables accurate, reproducible, and equivalent results across = different > implementations. To this end, the WG will define and maintain a = registry > of metric definitions. The WG encourages work which assesses the > comparability of measurements of IPPM metrics with metrics developed=20= > elsewhere. The WG also encourages work which improves the availability=20= > of information about the context in which measurements were taken. >=20 > The IPPM WG seeks cooperation with other appropriate standards bodies=20= > and forums to promote consistent approaches and metrics. Within the = IETF > process, IPPM metric definitions and measurement protocols will be > subject to as rigorous a scrutiny for usefulness, clarity, and = accuracy=20 > as other protocol standards. The IPPM WG will interact with other = areas=20 > of IETF activity whose scope intersects with the requirement of these=20= > specific metrics. The WG will, on request, provide input to other IETF=20= > working groups on the use and implementation of these metrics. >=20 > Specific near-term milestones include: >=20 > 1. Advancement of protocols for one- and two-way metrics (OWAMP and=20 > TWAMP respectively) along the standards track. >=20 > 2. Update of the IPPM framework document (RFC 2330) to reflect=20 > experience with the framework, and to cover planned future metric=20 > development. >=20 > 3. Definition of a registry of metric definitions to improve the > equivalency of metric results across multiple implementations. >=20 > 4. Publication of a rate measurement problem statement. >=20 > 5. Publication of documents supporting the use of IPSec to protect=20 > OWAMP/TWAMP. >=20 > 6. Publication of documents related to model-based TCP bulk transfer > capacity metrics. >=20 >=20 > Milestones: > Jul 2013 - Submit draft on RFC 2680 standards-track advancement=20 > testing to IESG as Informational > Dec 2013 - Submit draft on access rate measurement protocol problem > statement to IESG as Informational > Dec 2013 - Submit draft updating the IPPM Framework (2330-update) to > IESG as Proposed Standard > Dec 2013 - Submit draft on reference path for measurement location to > IESG as Informational > Dec 2013 - Submit draft on OWAMP / TWAMP Security to IESG as Proposed > Standard > Mar 2014 - Submit draft on model-based TCP bulk transfer capacity > metrics to IESG as Experimental > _______________________________________________ > ippm mailing list > ippm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm From k.pentikousis@huawei.com Mon Jun 17 06:58:40 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C0D621F9BEE for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 06:58:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TcQfl7SDE6FX for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 06:58:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9F521F9BC3 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 06:58:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id ATZ57281; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 13:58:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LHREML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 14:58:10 +0100 Received: from szxeml459-hub.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.202) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 14:58:29 +0100 Received: from SZXEML511-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.253]) by szxeml459-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.202]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 21:58:21 +0800 From: Konstantinos Pentikousis To: Brian Trammell , "ippm@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [ippm] Fwd: WG Action: Rechartered IP Performance Metrics (ippm) Thread-Index: AQHOafsHb7GyVCvW+0+7hVmACS9CTpk575Iw Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 13:58:19 +0000 Message-ID: <8D38716F0C1A444BA0CD7E96454366C24BB17556@szxeml511-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: <20130614155210.21513.89428.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.200.37.52] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Subject: Re: [ippm] Fwd: WG Action: Rechartered IP Performance Metrics (ippm) X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 13:58:40 -0000 Dear Brian, all, |Good news: our charter has been approved! Indeed! My warmest congratulations to the chairs and all those who worked t= o make this happen! | |Authors of drafts with milestones on the current charter: | |draft-bi-ippm-ipsec | |please be prepared to submit WG -00 versions of these documents before |the Berlin deadline (8 July): | |draft-ietf-ippm-ipsec We are working on an update and we will make the -00 deadline for sure. I w= ill present the new draft in Berlin as well. Until then, if folks would lik= e to contribute comments/text/ideas/considerations on the current draft, pl= ease do not hesitate to contact me. As I mentioned in Orlando, it would be = great if others would like to join this effort, so consider this as an open= call for contributors. Best regards, Kostas From giuseppe.aceto@unina.it Tue Jun 18 03:51:34 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C4321F972E for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 03:51:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.295 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.295 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.014, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xKRlrP7BegmA for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 03:51:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp2.unina.it (smtp2.unina.it [192.132.34.62]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2A0921F9425 for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 03:51:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (inbox.unina.it [192.132.34.41]) by smtp2.unina.it (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5IApI7B006105; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:51:19 +0200 Received: from 143.225.229.172 ([143.225.229.172]) by inbox.unina.it (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:51:18 +0200 Message-ID: <20130618125118.20823845gamdw2w6@inbox.unina.it> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:51:18 +0200 From: Giuseppe Aceto To: ippm@ietf.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3.8) Subject: [ippm] CFP IEEE M&N 2013 Deadline extended to 1st July (HARD DEADLINE) X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:51:34 -0000 **** Apologies if you receive multiple copies **** ===================================================================== CALL FOR PAPER - Extended abstract due: *July 1,2013 (hard deadline)* IEEE International Workshop on "Measurements & Networking" (M&N 2013) Naples, Italy | October 7-8, 2013 http://mn2013.ieee-ims.org/ I&M, IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Society ===================================================================== Following the success of the first edition, the 2nd IEEE International Workshop M&N 2013 aims to represent a forum for researchers and practitioners from industry, academia, and government interested in the areas of measurements, communications, computer science, wireless systems, sensor networks and to foster discussion on the role of both measurements for networking and networking for measurements. The workshop will provide the opportunity to gather complementary competencies from different fields, and discuss recent results and trends on related highly interdisciplinary topics: Authors are invited to submit extended abstracts (3-4 pages) reporting original research of theoretical or applied nature using on-line submission system. Guidelines for the authors are reported on the workshop website. TOPICS: QoS measurement and performance assessment * Methods and techniques for performance assessment in networks * Protocol analysis * Traffic analysis and monitoring * Cross-layer measurements * Error management and troubleshooting in networks Security measurements * Coexistence and interference problems in wireless networks * Signal integrity problems * Anomaly detection and classification * Models and measurements for dependability assessment Measurements on network infrastructures * Characterization of network equipment * In-service testing * Out-of-service measurements * Conformance and interoperability testing * Load tests Wireless Sensors Networks (WSN) * Modeling and performance prediction * Design and implementation * Measurements for characterization and performance assessment * Synchronization issues GRID and distributed measurements * GRID architecture for measurements * Distributed measurement systems The workshop has also two Special sessions on: - Dependability and security measurements in computer systems and networks (organized by Andrea Bondavalli, Univ. Florence and Marco Vieira, Univ. Coimbra) - Sensor Networks for Ambient Assisted Living (organized by Buno Ando', Univ. Catania) Accepted Papers will be included in the IEEE Xplore digital library and indexed by EI/Compendex. IMPORTANT: A Special Issue of the IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurements is connected to the workshop. Accepted papers will be included in the Workshop Proceedings published by IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Society, and distributed at the workshop. =================================================================== GENERAL CHAIRMAN Leopoldo Angrisani, University of Naples Federico II GENERAL CO-CHAIRMEN Kim Fowler, Kansas State University Claudio Narduzzi, University of Padova TECHNICAL PROGRAM CHAIRPERSONS Angela Sara Cacciapuoti, University of Naples Federico II Antonio Pescape', University of Naples Federico II Michele Vadursi, University of Naples "Parthenope" =================================================================== Important Deadlines: -------------------- - Extended abstract submission July 1st (hard deadline) - Acceptance notification July 20th - Full paper due September 7th FOR MORE INFORMATION VISIT http://mn2013.ieee-ims.org/ PAPER SUBMISSION: https://edas.info/newPaper.php?c=13155 -- Giuseppe Aceto, Junior Researcher Dipartimento di Ingegneria Elettrica e delle Tecnologie dell'Informazione (DIETI) Universita' degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II" Via Claudio 21 -- 80125 Napoli (Italy) [room 4.02] Phone: +390817683821 - Fax: +390817683816 From internet-drafts@ietf.org Fri Jun 21 18:38:56 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0273421E809E; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 18:38:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.515 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.515 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.085, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WyJU79DLUgt4; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 18:38:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D8C21E804B; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 18:38:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.51.p2 Message-ID: <20130622013854.26991.74721.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 18:38:54 -0700 Cc: ippm@ietf.org Subject: [ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-00.txt X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 01:38:56 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the IP Performance Metrics Working Group of t= he IETF. Title : Model Based Bulk Performance Metrics Author(s) : Matt Mathis Al Morton Filename : draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-00.txt Pages : 33 Date : 2013-06-21 Abstract: We introduce a new class of model based metrics designed to determine if a long path can meet predefined end-to-end application performance targets. This is done by subpath at a time testing -- by applying a suite of single property tests to successive subpaths of a long path. In many cases these single property tests are based on existing IPPM metrics, with the addition of success and validity criteria. The subpath at a time tests are designed to facilitate IP providers eliminating all known conditions that might prevent the full end-to- end path from meeting the users target performance. This approach makes it possible to to determine the IP performance requirements needed to support the desired end-to-end TCP performance. The IP metrics are based on traffic patterns that mimic TCP but are precomputed independently of the actual behavior of TCP over the subpath under test. This makes the measurements open loop, eliminating nearly all of the difficulties encountered by traditional bulk transport metrics, which rely on congestion control equilibrium behavior. A natural consequence of this methodology is verifiable network measurement: measurements from any given vantage point are repeatable from other vantage points. Formatted: Fri Jun 21 18:23:29 PDT 2013 The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-model-based-metrics-00 Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From trammell@tik.ee.ethz.ch Thu Jun 27 06:01:39 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11FD421F91B4 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 06:01:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pLUCqriVNJp0 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 06:01:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.ee.ethz.ch (smtp.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.219]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4023D21F9263 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 06:01:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0537ED9307 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 15:01:24 +0200 (MEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new on smtp.ee.ethz.ch Received: from smtp.ee.ethz.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.ee.ethz.ch [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ezkGrh2VY1Rz for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 15:01:23 +0200 (MEST) Received: from pb-10243.ethz.ch (pb-10243.ethz.ch [82.130.102.152]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: briant) by smtp.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CC831D9304 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 15:01:23 +0200 (MEST) From: Brian Trammell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 15:01:23 +0200 To: "ippm@ietf.org" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) Subject: [ippm] IPPM WG agenda for Berlin X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 13:01:39 -0000 Greetings, all, =01If you haven't done so already, please send requests for agenda slots = in Berlin to ippm-chairs@tools.ietf.org by Friday, July 12. We'll = definitely have slots for each of the current working group drafts, and = would like to hear updates on any significant progress on work already = introduced but for which we haven't adopted milestones, as well as any = new work fitting in our new charter.=20 Many thanks, best regards, Brian From a.botta@unina.it Fri Jun 28 01:21:30 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E8D021F9C0D for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 01:21:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.88 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.88 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HeL0ou3BaCTu for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 01:21:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp1.unina.it (smtp1.unina.it [192.132.34.61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D085221F95EF for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 01:20:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [143.225.229.166] ([143.225.229.166]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp1.unina.it (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5S8KaVd026052 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 28 Jun 2013 10:20:38 +0200 Message-ID: <51CD46B4.6090505@unina.it> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 10:17:56 +0200 From: Alessio Botta User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.11) Gecko/20121123 Icedove/10.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ippm@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: YIC@zurich.ibm.com Subject: [ippm] Next week deadline: ICNC 2014, Communication QoS and System Modeling Symposium X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 08:21:30 -0000 (We apologize if you receive multiple copies of this email) Communication QoS and System Modeling Symposium (CQSM) at IEEE ICNC 2014 February 3-6, 2014, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA The deadline for paper submission is NEXT WEEK!!! URL: http://www.conf-icnc.org/2014 =============== Important dates =============== Paper submission: July 5, 2013 Paper Acceptance: Sept. 20, 2013 Camera-ready paper: Oct. 20, 2013 =============== Submission Guidelines =============== Please follow the author instructions at http://www.conf-icnc.org/2014/author.htm Direct paper submission link of this symposium is http://www.edas.info/newPaper.php?c=14505&track=31375 ============== Scope ============== Communication networks are designed to offer services to end-users with suitable Quality of Service (QoS) level. To such an end, network traffic should be analyzed and appropriately controlled so that the desired QoS requirements are achieved. The development of today’s applications, network technologies and standards greatly leverages modeling and design tools. Furthermore, different methodologies including analytical modeling, simulation, experimentation, and monitoring are needed to support designs of communication networks and services. The aim of the “Communication QoS and System Modeling” Symposium is to provide an international forum for the discussion of communications service provisioning, the quality and mechanisms to support such services as well as the techniques to model and assess the efficiency of communication networks. ============== List of Topics ============== Authors are invited to submit original technical papers covering but not limited to the topics of interest listed below: -- Quality, scalability, reliability, and performance in network and their services, including o Internet o Optical networks o Autonomic systems o Wireless and mobile networks o Wireless and mobile networks o Grid and distributed computing o Wireless and mobile networks o Multimedia networks in voice over IP and IPTV -- Performance of large-scale experimental platforms -- Standardization aspects of QoS and reliability -- Network Performance evaluation methodologies o Network simulation o Network modeling o Network measurement and monitoring -- Design of networks and their services -- Cross-layer design, modeling and optimization -- Traffic economics -- Application/service oriented networking -- Traffic workload modeling and characterization -- Traffic and workload control -- Traffic engineering and traffic theory -- Metrics and models for QoE ============== Symposium Organizers ============== Lydia Y. Chen IBM Zurich Research Laboratory Säumerstrasse 4 8803 Rüschlikon, Switzerland yic[AT]zurich.ibm.com Antonio Pescapé Dipartimento di Ingegneria Elettrica e delle Tecnologie dell'Informazione University of Napoli ''Federico II'' Via Claudio, 21 - 80125, Napoli (Italy) pescape[AT]unina.it -- Alessio Botta, PhD Dipartimento di Ingegneria Elettrica e delle Tecnologie dell'Informazione Università degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II" Via Claudio 21 -- 80125 Napoli (Italy) [Room 3.09] Phone: +390817683865 - Fax: +390817683816 Skypeid: alessiobotta Email: a.botta@unina.it alessio.botta@consorzio-cini.it WWW: http://wpage.unina.it/a.botta From gregimirsky@gmail.com Fri Jun 28 11:54:53 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D3CA21F9A85 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:54:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V0iacb8hxL4J for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:54:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ve0-x22a.google.com (mail-ve0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E378B21F9A82 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:54:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ve0-f170.google.com with SMTP id 14so2167825vea.29 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:54:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=C3FzuHYBT8txlrudiv/grTHT2riE1AKt8JuRyWvSYiU=; b=UZiKDE+9/HD0vO4BxiNYvRuRZxXZK/M+HLPIAOI6dAol4oN/6EnUaEtazBlsa4wCDp +kd3yvp+YtIc76F+4e8P6DJosgYrQOAZOu3xiNlJQBULONTrCETiSeEbu15Q2NFvb53+ u1ULArrPk3KisJHVmhsdNY2uuDpLhzCojAx1ecNYJOrz+DGR/mxQllrvN5jRgBpV18/c NkigE9t/DrVqabzvKXLhbEqwDaNZ36C8Nj5/Riw5haUB/somaDfqOkedav51br6mQQLA ylt8H+HR1h8+WS50rHcQiO024L+NJEf/QHgUEoUv02Bfj1Ldh9OJr9qCf1+A4aMJDumS QcZA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.221.31.130 with SMTP id sg2mr5780924vcb.86.1372445692243; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:54:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.66.145 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:54:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:54:52 -0700 Message-ID: From: Greg Mirsky To: Brian Trammell Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1133a04cf5b9e904e03b695c Cc: "ippm@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [ippm] IPPM WG agenda for Berlin X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 18:54:53 -0000 --001a1133a04cf5b9e904e03b695c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Brian, et. al, I'd like to request a slot to present Type-P Descriptor Monitoring in Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP) work. Regards, Greg On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 6:01 AM, Brian Trammell wrote: > Greetings, all, > > If you haven't done so already, please send requests for agenda slots in > Berlin to ippm-chairs@tools.ietf.org by Friday, July 12. We'll definitely > have slots for each of the current working group drafts, and would like to > hear updates on any significant progress on work already introduced but for > which we haven't adopted milestones, as well as any new work fitting in our > new charter. > > Many thanks, best regards, > > Brian > > > _______________________________________________ > ippm mailing list > ippm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm > --001a1133a04cf5b9e904e03b695c Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Brian, et. al,
I'd like to = request a slot to present Type-P Descriptor M= onitoring in Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP) work.

Regards,
Greg

On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 6:01 AM, Brian Trammel= l <trammell@tik.ee.ethz.ch> wrote:
Greetings, all,

=A0If you haven't done so already, please send requests for agenda slot= s in Berlin to ippm-chairs@to= ols.ietf.org by Friday, July 12. We'll definitely have slots for ea= ch of the current working group drafts, and would like to hear updates on a= ny significant progress on work already introduced but for which we haven&#= 39;t adopted milestones, as well as any new work fitting in our new charter= .

Many thanks, best regards,

Brian


_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
ippm@ietf.org
ht= tps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm

--001a1133a04cf5b9e904e03b695c--