From nobody Fri May 13 15:16:36 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0515112D6AB; Fri, 13 May 2016 15:16:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 4.931 X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.931 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_FAIL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_RED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fSDlSwr3Z0A6; Fri, 13 May 2016 15:16:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vps1.thelaw.net (unknown [174.136.34.105]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C42A12B055; Fri, 13 May 2016 15:16:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [151.252.65.9] (port=42428 helo=ttgvry.com) by vps1.thelaw.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1b0LAB-0007rn-2L; Tue, 10 May 2016 20:50:19 -0700 From: ietf To: "internetpolicy" , "ippm" , "isis-wg" , "iso20022" , "isoc" , "jannisohms" Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 06:41:58 +0300 Message-ID: <0000b78ef9db$f7fe954c$c81925e7$@techie.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_5729DEAC.2C0ECF63" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: AdGoMl/ElMQTehiO5MszoEHM7pC5RQ== Content-Language: en-us X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - vps1.thelaw.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - techie.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: vps1.thelaw.net: authenticated_id: mwhitney@thelaw.net X-Authenticated-Sender: vps1.thelaw.net: mwhitney@thelaw.net Archived-At: Subject: [ippm] Fw: new message X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 22:16:35 -0000 This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_5729DEAC.2C0ECF63 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello! You have a new message, please read ietf ------=_NextPart_000_0001_5729DEAC.2C0ECF63 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<= span lang=3DEN-US>Hello!

You have a new message, please read http://adl.org.br/photography.php<= /a>

------=_NextPart_000_0001_5729DEAC.2C0ECF63-- From nobody Mon May 23 14:31:16 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDD1312D52A; Mon, 23 May 2016 14:31:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -108.328 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-108.328 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pQrQrEdFcv7t; Mon, 23 May 2016 14:31:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FCCF12D095; Mon, 23 May 2016 14:31:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id DB23C180004; Mon, 23 May 2016 14:30:37 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20160523213037.DB23C180004@rfc-editor.org> Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 14:30:37 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Cc: ippm@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [ippm] RFC 7799 on Active and Passive Metrics and Methods (with Hybrid Types In-Between) X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 21:31:13 -0000 A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 7799 Title: Active and Passive Metrics and Methods (with Hybrid Types In-Between) Author: A. Morton Status: Informational Stream: IETF Date: May 2016 Mailbox: acmorton@att.com Pages: 14 Characters: 33717 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-ippm-active-passive-06.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7799 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17487/RFC7799 This memo provides clear definitions for Active and Passive performance assessment. The construction of Metrics and Methods can be described as either "Active" or "Passive". Some methods may use a subset of both Active and Passive attributes, and we refer to these as "Hybrid Methods". This memo also describes multiple dimensions to help evaluate new methods as they emerge. This document is a product of the IP Performance Metrics Working Group of the IETF. INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC From nobody Thu May 26 00:24:25 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ippm@ietf.org Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91AFB12D5DB; Thu, 26 May 2016 00:24:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "\"IETF Meeting Session Request Tool\"" To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.21.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20160526072423.14562.47441.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 00:24:23 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: ippm-chairs@ietf.org, ippm@ietf.org Subject: [ippm] ippm - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 96 X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 07:24:23 -0000 A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Brian Trammell, a Chair of the ippm working group. --------------------------------------------------------- Working Group Name: IP Performance Metrics Area Name: Transport Area Session Requester: Brian Trammell Number of Sessions: 1 Length of Session(s): 2 Hours Number of Attendees: 50 Conflicts to Avoid: First Priority: tsvarea tsvwg tcpm taps bmwg lmap xrblock Second Priority: v6ops 6man 6lo sunset4 opsec cdni alto rmcat tcpinc Special Requests: Please try not to schedule opposite irtfopen, iccrg, maprg, quic BOF, plus BOF. ---------------------------------------------------------