From nobody Wed Nov 9 13:02:27 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C044612996A for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2016 13:02:25 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.619 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.619 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4J0-113m1MeF for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2016 13:02:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FDCB1298B1 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2016 13:02:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A02C720774 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2016 16:02:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 09 Nov 2016 16:02:23 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:reply-to:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=8AJKLVuNHtvMwx4jsxiiPxws0f 8=; b=ktnrSjqGopijURpDU3PGCLsRQNPCyE+FP4q+duETlyGXcW3LEH093mheBJ PPD/7Lqe92WAXTF8hTyalUhK/wQ0jWeBIpPD0rN6hHHg+PMBrtiPS6O3T6fMqKQS yLtJiVkZVxOd6rKGmITGYkkHYDk2CJKVLLkTfpzsqCeRLuFgY= X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: 6pX6SVByWQkpEAbKj2iKMob8lj9Kp7yGae9ySXU17489 1478725341 Received: from eng-6-29.aa.arbor.net (unknown [216.130.192.3]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9C900CC0B5 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2016 16:02:21 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Cerveny Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D2655493-69B4-4194-8D98-567AF8337E9B" Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 16:02:20 -0500 Message-Id: To: IETF IPPM WG Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) Archived-At: Subject: [ippm] IPPM @ IETF97 Logistics and slides needed X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: IPPM Chairs List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2016 21:02:26 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_D2655493-69B4-4194-8D98-567AF8337E9B Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Dear IPPM participants, To confirm, the IPPM working group meeting at IETF97 in Seoul will be = from 15:50 to 17:50 KST (6:50-9:20 UTC) Monday, November 14, 2016 in = room Studio 2 of the venue hotel, Conrad Seoul. The agenda is available = at https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/97/agenda = Presenters: please send your slides to ippm-chairs@ietf.org (which is = also the reply-to for this e-mail.). Since the meeting is on the Monday = of IETF week and I=E2=80=99ll be uploading them from a different = time-zone, I=E2=80=99d greatly appreciate if you can send slides can be = sent as early as practical. Thanks, Bill Cerveny IPPM co-chair= --Apple-Mail=_D2655493-69B4-4194-8D98-567AF8337E9B Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Dear IPPM participants,

To confirm, the IPPM working group = meeting at IETF97 in Seoul will be from 15:50 to 17:50 KST (6:50-9:20 = UTC) Monday, November 14, 2016 in room Studio 2 of the venue = hotel, Conrad Seoul. The agenda is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/97/agenda

Presenters: please send = your slides to ippm-chairs@ietf.org (which is also the reply-to for this = e-mail.). Since the meeting is on the Monday of IETF week and I=E2=80=99ll= be uploading them from a different time-zone, I=E2=80=99d greatly = appreciate if you can send slides can be sent as early as = practical.

Thanks,

Bill Cerveny
IPPM co-chair
= --Apple-Mail=_D2655493-69B4-4194-8D98-567AF8337E9B-- From nobody Mon Nov 14 19:10:46 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ippm@ietf.org Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0929B129441; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 19:10:44 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.37.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <147917944400.8485.7060015046755932447.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 19:10:44 -0800 Archived-At: Cc: ippm@ietf.org Subject: [ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-time-format-01.txt X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 03:10:44 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the IP Performance Metrics of the IETF. Title : Support of IEEE-1588 time stamp format in Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP) Authors : Greg Mirsky Israel Meilik Filename : draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-time-format-01.txt Pages : 8 Date : 2016-11-14 Abstract: This document describes an OPTIONAL feature for active performance measurement protocols allowing use of time stamp format defined in IEEE-1588v2-2008. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-time-format/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-time-format-01 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-time-format-01 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Wed Nov 16 23:17:44 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3B441295AF; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 23:17:37 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OnBHK3xCr5sU; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 23:17:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx0b-0016f401.pphosted.com (mx0b-0016f401.pphosted.com [67.231.156.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E28C1295B4; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 23:17:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0045851.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-0016f401.pphosted.com (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id uAH7FVg8011683; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 23:17:34 -0800 Received: from il-exch02.marvell.com ([199.203.130.102]) by mx0b-0016f401.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 26rr3munmf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 23:17:34 -0800 Received: from IL-EXCH01.marvell.com (10.4.102.220) by IL-EXCH02.marvell.com (10.4.102.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 09:17:32 +0200 Received: from IL-EXCH01.marvell.com ([fe80::5d63:81cd:31e2:fc36]) by IL-EXCH01.marvell.com ([fe80::5d63:81cd:31e2:fc36%20]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Thu, 17 Nov 2016 09:17:32 +0200 From: Tal Mizrahi To: "stewart.bryant@gmail.com" , "mpls@ietf.org" , "'ippm@ietf.org'" , "draft-bryant-mpls-rfc6374-sfl@tools.ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Multiplexed Marking in draft-bryant-mpls-rfc6374-sfl Thread-Index: AdJAoQo4z12hm+yYQH+GnUjrpdgkXA== Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 07:17:31 +0000 Message-ID: <69689c3967554a698d93d1010e479d7f@IL-EXCH01.marvell.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [199.203.130.14] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_69689c3967554a698d93d1010e479d7fILEXCH01marvellcom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2016-11-17_04:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1609300000 definitions=main-1611170136 Archived-At: Subject: [ippm] Multiplexed Marking in draft-bryant-mpls-rfc6374-sfl X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 07:17:38 -0000 --_000_69689c3967554a698d93d1010e479d7fILEXCH01marvellcom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Today at the MPLS WG meeting I suggested that the multiplexed marking conce= pt that was presented in IPPM (see link below) can be applied to draft-brya= nt-mpls-rfc6374-sfl. Using this multiplexing approach, the number of SFLs u= sed for measurement can potentially be reduced from 3 or 4 labels to just 2= labels. Note that the assumption in the multiplexed marking draft is that = you can use a guard-band period between the start time of the loss measurem= ent window, and the start time of the delay measurement. Here is a link to the multiplexed marking draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mizrahi-ippm-multiplexed-alternate-m= arking/ Any feedback about the multiplexed marking draft, and about its applicabili= ty to MPLS will be welcome. I will be happy to discuss this further. Cheers, Tal. --_000_69689c3967554a698d93d1010e479d7fILEXCH01marvellcom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

 

Today at the MPLS WG meeting I suggested that the mu= ltiplexed marking concept that was presented in IPPM (see link below) can b= e applied to draft-bryant-mpls-rfc6374-sfl. Using this multiplexing approac= h, the number of SFLs used for measurement can potentially be reduced from 3 or 4 labels to just 2 labels. Note that = the assumption in the multiplexed marking draft is that you can use a guard= -band period between the start time of the loss measurement window, and the= start time of the delay measurement.

 

Here is a link to the multiplexed marking draft:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc= /draft-mizrahi-ippm-multiplexed-alternate-marking/

 

Any feedback about the multiplexed marking draft, an= d about its applicability to MPLS will be welcome.

I will be happy to discuss this further.<= /p>

 

Cheers,

Tal.

 

--_000_69689c3967554a698d93d1010e479d7fILEXCH01marvellcom_-- From nobody Mon Nov 28 20:48:13 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 267D91295B9 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 20:48:12 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5phalvrbGBkx for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 20:48:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from NAM03-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-co1nam03on0118.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.40.118]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E2031295AA for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2016 20:48:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-juniper-net; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=eEe3eiJhORChOYiuUszvMXfGtRILd5CU1Pio8kC5ntU=; b=Drq6YX92M3DZG33N3KMqVJJSnckN5876h4OctA6oq0ql3YEO1ezhyNK7zfP/dChRQbjCwQJ+IUM45AJ2R9+5xaZ/dvjBZBkgyWrhZInRUqi/erEWlhE++0Ty57BbQo+Bk/4PoU7HVnxLYZ+WkS06H2+4soHv16+HBET1W+J0wOA= Received: from BN6PR05MB2963.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.173.18.148) by BN6PR05MB2852.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.168.255.137) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.761.5; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 04:48:06 +0000 Received: from BN6PR05MB2963.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.18.148]) by BN6PR05MB2963.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.18.148]) with mapi id 15.01.0721.004; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 04:48:06 +0000 From: Sudhin Jacob To: "ippm@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: REG:draft-bhaprasud-ippm-pm-00.txt Thread-Index: AdJJ+fBIzHA/mHSTSeWGsaXIyk5dCw== Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 04:48:06 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=sjacob@juniper.net; x-originating-ip: [116.197.184.13] x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN6PR05MB2852; 7:9MVI8okmpo3pYC5y/Da4Sgr7VPWjSn+7HZQ2VDo4dklq8XFSr967P38bTR+GRMbrl9oUeEwVVBY3nETCHW6ThOeQvMsfBzQPIr9eAcDrNVfvOS/6ZbpvCngaUPkaUKg0reL3Z/Of6KxdBIn4AAnl9Bckzj9eIJEDbfgjlPOqh6LXOCLjGOe3AkcViR677742eG7GLt0BqAVgnZIWs+LUa7DeeqO6JtStfv2Yom8qy0JPAYzYgRHgx+s1PuQDgQxgYQu8dVcsfwmNOLUT8+gFPOfbgjkrzjidozKyKnl7FekCLhSkHMijqFWMDZnFk5nHSjO+AyuRSF6DwQZVuinLdqlfJfSYDmBkzAF6uAodIOw+LIpSth6qq+P10RVm5TIuEr2cy/JsveSkk/zaRlp52yZu4E15tDCtm1xSAvoOGlNGq3Yx42dPlJc4MJ7rVrksPOSfRu89hb98TEus1DEKpA== x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:SKI; SCL:-1SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(189002)(199003)(6506003)(7736002)(7846002)(39060400001)(38730400001)(7696004)(5660300001)(2900100001)(39410400001)(39380400001)(305945005)(106356001)(2351001)(39400400001)(189998001)(6916009)(74316002)(86362001)(66066001)(97736004)(110136003)(92566002)(3660700001)(81156014)(8676002)(3280700002)(5640700001)(54356999)(2501003)(76576001)(101416001)(1730700003)(33656002)(8936002)(81166006)(122556002)(4326007)(3846002)(6116002)(102836003)(99286002)(77096006)(105586002)(39450400002)(9686002)(50986999)(2906002)(230783001)(68736007); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN6PR05MB2852; H:BN6PR05MB2963.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 240a117e-04c4-42ef-a65c-08d41812e8e5 x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(22001);SRVR:BN6PR05MB2852; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(72170088055959)(21748063052155); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6060326)(6040361)(6045199)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026)(6041248)(6061324)(20161123564025)(20161123562025)(20161123560025)(20161123555025); SRVR:BN6PR05MB2852; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN6PR05MB2852; x-forefront-prvs: 01415BB535 received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BN6PR05MB29630009835C5C99F685D9F2C28D0BN6PR05MB2963namp_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 29 Nov 2016 04:48:06.0413 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN6PR05MB2852 Archived-At: Cc: Praveen A , Bharat M Gaonkar Subject: [ippm] REG:draft-bhaprasud-ippm-pm-00.txt X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 04:48:12 -0000 --_000_BN6PR05MB29630009835C5C99F685D9F2C28D0BN6PR05MB2963namp_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Respected All, This is regarding the above draft. May I request you to review it and let u= s know the feedback. We appreciate your support. Feature This is draft is explaining about various models for loss monitoring, we ar= e not discussing any protocol payload. This can be used for any technologie= s, active/passive measurements. This draft broadly divided in to 4 areas. 1. Complete loss measurement in single direction. 2. Color Based measurement. 3. Cos based measurement. 4. Cos and color based measurement. The benefit of this model is that the provider's end customer can check whe= ther their provider is giving the committed rate, provider can measure the = burst of their end customer traffic and bill accordingly. This gives the flexibility to measure the packet based on COS model and eac= h COS level is treated separately. The color gives the flexibility to check= the excess burst. Regards, Sudhin --_000_BN6PR05MB29630009835C5C99F685D9F2C28D0BN6PR05MB2963namp_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Respected All,
 
This is regarding the above draft. May I request you to review it and = let us know the feedback. We appreciate your support.
 
Feature
 
This is draft is explaining about various models for loss monitoring, = we are not discussing any protocol payload. This can be used for any techno= logies, active/passive measurements.
This draft broadly divided in to  4 areas.
 
  1. Complete loss measurement in single direction.
  2. Color Based meas= urement.
  3. Cos based measurement.
  4. Cos and color based measure= ment.
 
The benefit of this model is that the provider’s end customer ca= n check whether their provider is giving the committed rate, provider can m= easure the burst of their end customer traffic and bill accordingly.
This gives the flexibility to measure the packet based on COS model an= d each COS level is treated separately. The color gives the flexibility to = check the excess burst.
 
Regards,
Sudhin
 
 --_000_BN6PR05MB29630009835C5C99F685D9F2C28D0BN6PR05MB2963namp_-- From nobody Wed Nov 30 17:01:12 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ippm@ietf.org Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E46BC127A91; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 17:01:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.39.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <148055406593.9654.1959658797607139676.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 17:01:05 -0800 Archived-At: Cc: ippm@ietf.org Subject: [ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry-10.txt X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 01:01:06 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the IP Performance Metrics of the IETF. Title : Registry for Performance Metrics Authors : Marcelo Bagnulo Benoit Claise Philip Eardley Al Morton Aamer Akhter Filename : draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry-10.txt Pages : 32 Date : 2016-11-30 Abstract: This document defines the format for the Performance Metrics registry and defines the IANA Registry for Performance Metrics. This document also gives a set of guidelines for Registered Performance Metric requesters and reviewers. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry-10 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry-10 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Wed Nov 30 17:13:37 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3809A129A17 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 17:13:32 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.601 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8mOEinUgx3Sy for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 17:13:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1C0E127A90 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 17:13:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0049287.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049287.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id uB115GaG007602; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 20:13:22 -0500 Received: from alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp7.sbc.com [144.160.229.24]) by m0049287.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 2729cv988t-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 30 Nov 2016 20:13:22 -0500 Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uB11DKcY028129; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 20:13:20 -0500 Received: from mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com [130.9.128.241]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uB11DB8Q028040 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 30 Nov 2016 20:13:12 -0500 Received: from clpi183.sldc.sbc.com (clpi183.sldc.sbc.com [135.41.1.46]) by mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor); Thu, 1 Dec 2016 01:12:53 GMT Received: from sldc.sbc.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clpi183.sldc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uB11Cqcq001789; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:12:52 -0600 Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (mail-blue.research.att.com [135.207.178.11]) by clpi183.sldc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uB11Cf96001040; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:12:42 -0600 Received: from exchange.research.att.com (njmtcas2.research.att.com [135.207.255.47]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B8E8F0508; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 20:12:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from njmtexg5.research.att.com ([fe80::b09c:ff13:4487:78b6]) by njmtcas2.research.att.com ([fe80::d550:ec84:f872:cad9%15]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 20:12:41 -0500 From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" To: "ippm@ietf.org" , "Michelle Cotton (michelle.cotton@icann.org)" , "Amanda Baber (amanda.baber@iana.org)" Thread-Topic: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry-10.txt Thread-Index: AQHSS253viVcxTvN/kib48FwW4Pzg6DyRzdw Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 01:12:40 +0000 Message-ID: <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF66092A@njmtexg5.research.att.com> References: <148055406593.9654.1959658797607139676.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <148055406593.9654.1959658797607139676.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [130.10.211.66] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-RSA-Inspected: yes X-RSA-Classifications: public X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2016-11-30_20:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1609300000 definitions=main-1612010018 Archived-At: Cc: Benoit Claise , Aamer Akhter Subject: Re: [ippm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry-10.txt X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 01:13:32 -0000 IPPM and IANA Experts, I met with IANA folks again in Seoul, and collected additional comments and suggestions for clarification from Michelle and Amanda. This version addresses their comments. Michelle and Amanda, We talked about a mock-up of the Registry. After returning home, I realized I made a mock-up back in 2014. I'll share that (an updated version) with you in a separate message. comments welcome, Al > -----Original Message----- > From: I-D-Announce [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > internet-drafts@ietf.org > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 8:01 PM > To: i-d-announce@ietf.org > Cc: ippm@ietf.org > Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry-10.txt >=20 >=20 > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the IP Performance Metrics of the IETF. >=20 > Title : Registry for Performance Metrics > Authors : Marcelo Bagnulo > Benoit Claise > Philip Eardley > Al Morton > Aamer Akhter > Filename : draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry-10.txt > Pages : 32 > Date : 2016-11-30 >=20 > Abstract: > This document defines the format for the Performance Metrics registry > and defines the IANA Registry for Performance Metrics. This document > also gives a set of guidelines for Registered Performance Metric > requesters and reviewers. >=20 >=20 > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry/ >=20 > There's also a htmlized version available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry-10 >=20 > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry-10 >=20 >=20 > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >=20 > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >=20 > _______________________________________________ > I-D-Announce mailing list > I-D-Announce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce > Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html > or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt