Return-Path: <owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu>
X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 2.0
Return-Path: <owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
	by ece.cmu.edu (8.11.0/8.10.2) id h06Jk8I13043
	for ips-outgoing; Mon, 6 Jan 2003 14:46:08 -0500 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: ece.cmu.edu: majordom set sender to owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu using -f
Received: from quicksall.com ([63.99.209.87])
	by ece.cmu.edu (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id h06Jk3W13027;
	Mon, 6 Jan 2003 14:46:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ivvt2dxrc11 [24.62.223.170] by quicksall.com with ESMTP
  (SMTPD32-7.12) id ABD84EB00F6; Mon, 06 Jan 2003 13:41:12 -0600
Reply-To: <Eddy_Quicksall@ivivity.com>
From: "Eddy Quicksall" <Eddy_Quicksall@ivivity.com>
To: "'Julian Satran'" <Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com>
Cc: <ips@ece.cmu.edu>, <owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu>
Subject: RE: iSCSI: Implicit Termination of Tasks
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 11:45:53 -0500
Message-ID: <009601c2b5a3$14a96e20$6403a8c0@ivvt2dxrc11>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
In-Reply-To: <OF1C96951B.8274B342-ONC2256CA6.006459DC-C2256CA6.00658915@telaviv.ibm.com>
Sender: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
Precedence: bulk

Then I assume 10.14.5 should also include item D which is in 6.5.

Eddy

-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Satran [mailto:Julian_Satran@il.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 1:29 PM
To: Eddy_Quicksall@ivivity.com
Cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu; owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
Subject: Re: iSCSI: Implicit Termination of Tasks



there are no ordering issues in case d. The termination is "brutal" -
the whole session disappear. In the other cases
some ordering side effects must be considered.

Julo



"Eddy Quicksall" <Eddy_Quicksall@ivivity.com>
Sent by: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu


06/01/03 15:16


Please respond to
<Eddy_Quicksall@ivivity.com>


To
<ips@ece.cmu.edu>

cc

Subject
iSCSI: Implicit Termination of Tasks







There are two sections titled Implicit Termination of Tasks but they are
slightly different. Which is correct?

Section 6.5 lists 4 items but section 10.14.5 only lists two [correction -
three].

If 6.5 is correct, why is item D not included in the unit attention?
SAM-3 says:

5.7.2 When a SCSI initiator port aborts its own tasks
When a SCSI initiator port causes its own task(s) to be aborted, no
notification that the task(s) have been aborted
shall be returned to the SCSI initiator port other than the completion
response for the command or task
management function action that caused the task(s) to be aborted and
notification(s) associated with related
effects of the action (e.g., a reset unit attention condition).

Eddy