Return-Path: <owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu>
X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 2.0
Return-Path: <owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
	by ece.cmu.edu (8.11.0/8.10.2) id h12Lddf19074
	for ips-outgoing; Sun, 2 Feb 2003 16:39:39 -0500 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: ece.cmu.edu: majordom set sender to owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu using -f
Received: from lion.ninthwonder.com (lion.ninthwonder.com [151.199.66.147])
	by ece.cmu.edu (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id h12LdaW19068
	for <ips@ece.cmu.edu>; Sun, 2 Feb 2003 16:39:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: by lion.ninthwonder.com (Postfix, from userid 1021)
	id 20C4930706; Sun,  2 Feb 2003 16:39:21 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 13:38:10 -0800 (PST)
From: Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@wasabisystems.com>
X-X-Sender:  <wrstuden@candlekeep.home-net.internetconnect.net>
To: Eddy Quicksall <eddy_quicksall@ivivity.com>
Cc: "Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)" <Elliott@hp.com>, <ips@ece.cmu.edu>
Subject: RE: iSCSI: different question about terminated tasks
In-Reply-To: <AEC4671C8179D61194DE0002B328BDD20C64@ATLOPS>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0302021305030.408-100000@candlekeep.home-net.internetconnect.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Eddy Quicksall wrote:

> Thanks, it was the abort that I really didn't understand.
>
> It appears as though there is not "one ACA for each terminated task" ... do
> you agree with that?

Why not? The task had NACA set, and it died...

I'm not saying I wouldn't like you to be correct, I just haven't reached
that conclusion yet.

Take care,

Bill