Return-Path: X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 2.0 Return-Path: Received: from bache.ece.cmu.edu (BACHE.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.23]) by ece.cmu.edu (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id h4LKSh311334 for ; Wed, 21 May 2003 16:28:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: by bache.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix, from userid 953) id 4D36DB4; Wed, 21 May 2003 16:28:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sos.ece.cmu.edu (SOS.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.27]) by bache.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE80776; Wed, 21 May 2003 16:28:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: by sos.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) id C327C89D5; Wed, 21 May 2003 16:27:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from hazard.ece.cmu.edu (HAZARD.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.24]) by sos.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3A438950 for ; Wed, 21 May 2003 16:27:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: by hazard.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) id 820F479; Wed, 21 May 2003 16:27:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: by hazard.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix, from userid 953) id 5FC037B; Wed, 21 May 2003 16:27:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sos.ece.cmu.edu (SOS.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.27]) by hazard.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 830BD79 for ; Wed, 21 May 2003 16:27:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: by sos.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix, from userid 363) id 5464C89D6; Wed, 21 May 2003 16:27:52 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: ips@sos.ece.cmu.edu Received: from osgood.ece.cmu.edu (OSGOOD.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.25]) by sos.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BA988950 for ; Wed, 21 May 2003 16:27:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: by osgood.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) id 0F16C97; Wed, 21 May 2003 16:27:50 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: ips@ece.cmu.edu Received: by osgood.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix, from userid 953) id D89849B; Wed, 21 May 2003 16:27:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from osmtp2.electric.net (osmtp2.electric.net [216.129.90.29]) by osgood.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF6699 for ; Wed, 21 May 2003 16:27:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from root by osmtp2.electric.net with emc1-ok (Exim 4.10) id 19IaBd-000K3w-0W; Wed, 21 May 2003 13:27:45 -0700 Received: by emcmailer; Wed, May 21 2003 13:27:45 -0700 Received: from 236.sub-166-154-130.myvzw.com ([166.154.130.236] helo=EGRodriguez) by osmtp2.electric.net with asmtp (Exim 4.10) id 19IaBc-000JxL-0W; Wed, 21 May 2003 13:27:44 -0700 From: "Elizabeth G. Rodriguez" To: "'Andy Homan'" , Subject: RE: FCIP Special Frame Length Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 13:25:59 -0700 Keywords: IETF-IPS Message-ID: <00ea01c31fd7$398da640$5d839aa6@EGRodriguez> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <3C7122FAF06DD5118ED600500473364803B22AAF@esply01.cnt.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Sender: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu Precedence: bulk X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,IN_REP_TO,ORIGINAL_MESSAGE version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) Hi Andy, Thank you for pointing this out. All: The issue here is that in word 3 of the special frame, the frame length of the special frame is specified as 0b0000010010, and it's complement as 0b1111101101. These values should be 0b0000010011 and 0b1111101100 respectively. I will be taking action to have this corrected prior to publication as = an RFC. Thanks, Elizabeth Rodriguez IPS co-chair -----Original Message----- From: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu [mailto:owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu] On Behalf Of = Andy Homan Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 3:09 PM To: 'ips@ece.cmu.edu' Subject: FCIP Special Frame Length I was reviewing the most recent FCIP draft (draft-ietf-ips-fcovertcpip-12.txt) and noticed that in section 8.1 the length of the FSF is defined as the constant value of 18 words, even = though the frame is actually 19 words long. The FSF size described in 14.2.2 = of FC-BB-2 is in accordance with the latter length. If this was not done erroneously, might someone be able to explain the rationale behind this discrepancy in lengths? Thanks, Andy Homan Computer Network Technology Phone: 763.268.6372 andy_homan@cnt.com http://www.cnt.com