Return-Path: X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 2.0 Return-Path: Received: from hazard.ece.cmu.edu (HAZARD.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.24]) by ece.cmu.edu (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id h5GJ5r311866 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:05:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: by hazard.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix, from userid 953) id E634EB0; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:05:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sos.ece.cmu.edu (SOS.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.27]) by hazard.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3C3C90; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:05:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: by sos.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) id 098228950; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:05:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from bache.ece.cmu.edu (BACHE.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.23]) by sos.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D73B3894F for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:05:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: by bache.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) id B732B73; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:05:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: by bache.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix, from userid 953) id 8CD0E7A; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:05:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sos.ece.cmu.edu (SOS.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.27]) by bache.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CF0D73 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:05:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: by sos.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix, from userid 363) id 22CFD89D7; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:05:01 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: ips@sos.ece.cmu.edu Received: from osgood.ece.cmu.edu (OSGOOD.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.25]) by sos.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CEC1894F for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:04:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: by osgood.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) id A71787E; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:04:58 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: ips@ece.cmu.edu Received: by osgood.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix, from userid 953) id 80E1A82; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:04:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail2.microsoft.com (mail2.microsoft.com [131.107.3.124]) by osgood.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABBC37E for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:04:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail5.microsoft.com ([157.54.6.156]) by mail2.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6624); Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:04:56 -0700 Received: from inet-vrs-06.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.6.181]) by mail5.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6624); Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:04:54 -0700 Received: from 157.54.5.25 by inet-vrs-06.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:04:54 -0700 Received: from red-imc-02.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.9.107]) by inet-hub-03.redmond.corp.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:04:54 -0700 Received: from win-imc-01.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([157.54.0.39]) by red-imc-02.redmond.corp.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:04:51 -0700 Received: from WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([157.54.12.82]) by win-imc-01.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3788.0); Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:04:53 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6940.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: iSCSI: CHAP_C Encoding Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:04:51 -0700 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: iSCSI: CHAP_C Encoding Thread-Index: AcM0Oa8yVneBMjE9T7GjKhmUz/U1vgAAEZow From: "Lakshmi Ramasubramanian" To: "Paul Koning" Cc: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Jun 2003 19:04:53.0252 (UTC) FILETIME=[2B1C2C40:01C3343A] Sender: owner-ips@ece.cmu.edu Precedence: bulk X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_10 version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) In that case Section 11.1.4 should state that CHAP_C is a large binary value (which'll then eliminate the use of Decimal encoding for CHAP_C). Correct? -lakshmi -----Original Message----- From: Paul Koning [mailto:pkoning@equallogic.com]=20 Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 12:01 PM To: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian Cc: ips@ece.cmu.edu Subject: Re: iSCSI: CHAP_C Encoding >>>>> "Lakshmi" =3D=3D Lakshmi Ramasubramanian writes: Lakshmi> Section 11.1.4 states that CHAP_C is a binary value, and Lakshmi> hence could be a regular binary value ( <=3D 64 bits) or a Lakshmi> large binary value ( > 64 bits) (Section 5.1 Text Lakshmi> Format). So CHAP_C can be encoded in decimal format Lakshmi> also. Right? (Decimal format is allowed only for regular Lakshmi> binary values). No, because the length matters, and decimal numbers don't have a length you can derive from the encoding. paul