From ips-bounces@ietf.org Thu Jun 5 14:24:31 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ips-archive@optimus.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-ips-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F30228C132; Thu, 5 Jun 2008 14:24:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: ips@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: ips@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74B1428C0E4 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2008 14:24:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.002 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qgBdhj8KSxeO for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2008 14:24:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fmailhost03.isp.att.net (fmailhost03.isp.att.net [204.127.217.103]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92FDD3A6D8F for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2008 14:23:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivvtdkv0981 (adsl-218-205-129.jax.bellsouth.net[68.218.205.129]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc03) with SMTP id <20080605212349H0300s4taee>; Thu, 5 Jun 2008 21:23:50 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [68.218.205.129] Message-ID: <001901c8c752$73a57c90$0602a8c0@ivivity.com> From: "Eddy Quicksall" To: References: <27885.65355.qm@web51704.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 17:23:50 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Subject: [Ips] OSD over iSCSI X-BeenThere: ips@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: IP Storage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1438525841==" Sender: ips-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ips-bounces@ietf.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============1438525841== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0016_01C8C730.EB71F1D0" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01C8C730.EB71F1D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I would like to test my target's support of long CDB's. So I'm looking = for an iSCSI initiator that will carry long CDB's and hopefully an OSD = version 2 file system (since OSD issues 200 byte CDB's). Does anyone = know of anything or work in progress? Eddy ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01C8C730.EB71F1D0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I would like to test my target's support of long=20 CDB's. So I'm looking for an iSCSI initiator that will carry long=20 CDB's and hopefully an OSD version 2 file system (since OSD issues = 200 byte=20 CDB's). Does anyone know of anything or work in progress?
 
Eddy
------=_NextPart_000_0016_01C8C730.EB71F1D0-- --===============1438525841== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Ips mailing list Ips@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips --===============1438525841==-- From ips-bounces@ietf.org Thu Jun 5 14:38:17 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ips-archive@optimus.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-ips-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4854B3A69CD; Thu, 5 Jun 2008 14:38:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: ips@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: ips@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A2A83A6AF7 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2008 14:38:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.227 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.227 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.225, BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4rYjAG9oKtxZ for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2008 14:38:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fmailhost06.isp.att.net (fmailhost06.isp.att.net [204.127.217.106]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40CFD3A6ABB for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2008 14:38:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivvtdkv0981 (adsl-218-205-129.jax.bellsouth.net[68.218.205.129]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc06) with SMTP id <20080605213822H060011v9se>; Thu, 5 Jun 2008 21:38:22 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [68.218.205.129] Message-ID: <002d01c8c754$7b43cb80$0602a8c0@ivivity.com> From: "Eddy Quicksall" To: "HUJason" , References: <4804B03C.6060507@voltaire.com> Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 17:38:22 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Subject: Re: [Ips] Write residual scenario X-BeenThere: ips@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: IP Storage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0031906969==" Sender: ips-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ips-bounces@ietf.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============0031906969== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002A_01C8C732.F388CC20" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_002A_01C8C732.F388CC20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable For a disk underrun, you could issue a write(10) of one block but an = Expected Data Transfer Length of 1. I don't know if that is an error for = SCSI but it was not for earlier disk drives. In fact in the late '60s we = did do that to initialize the sectors on a disk with the sector address = ... the rest of the sector would just get 0's. For an overrun, try = writing 0 blocks but specify a positive Expected Data Transfer Length. It may be more logical for some other types of devices. Eddy ----- Original Message -----=20 From: HUJason=20 To: ips@ietf.org=20 Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 10:27 PM Subject: [Ips] Write residual scenario Dears, =20 In RFC5048 There is a line describing the residual cases: =20 > Note that the Overflow and Underflow scenarios are independent of > Data-In and Data-Out. Either scenario is logically possible in > either direction of data transfer. =20 Can anyone please picture a case for the Data-Out residual? I know it = is logically possible, but when it happen it should be a "not good" = write response, right? =20 Thank you and Best Regards, Jason HU -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- =D3=C3 Windows Live Spaces = =D5=B9=CA=BE=B8=F6=D0=D4=D7=D4=CE=D2=A3=AC=D3=EB=BA=C3=D3=D1=B7=D6=CF=ED=C9= =FA=BB=EE=A3=A1 =C1=CB=BD=E2=B8=FC=B6=E0=D0=C5=CF=A2=A3=A1=20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- _______________________________________________ Ips mailing list Ips@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips ------=_NextPart_000_002A_01C8C732.F388CC20 Content-Type: text/html; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
For a disk underrun, you could issue a = write(10) of=20 one block but an Expected Data Transfer Length of 1. I don't know if = that is an=20 error for SCSI but it was not for earlier disk drives. In fact in = the late=20 '60s we did do that to initialize the sectors on a disk with the = sector=20 address ... the rest of the sector would just get 0's. For an overrun, = try=20 writing 0 blocks but specify a positive Expected Data Transfer=20 Length.
 
It may be more logical for some other = types of=20 devices.
 
Eddy
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 HUJason
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 = 10:27 PM
Subject: [Ips] Write residual=20 scenario

Dears,
 
In RFC5048 There is a line = describing the=20 residual cases:
 
> Note that the Overflow and Underflow = scenarios are independent of
> Data-In and Data-Out.  = Either=20 scenario is logically possible in
> either direction of data=20 transfer.
 
Can anyone please picture a case for = the=20 Data-Out residual? I know it is logically possible, but when it happen = it=20 should be a "not good" write response, right?
 
Thank you = and Best=20 Regards,

Jason HU

=D3=C3 Windows Live Spaces = =D5=B9=CA=BE=B8=F6=D0=D4=D7=D4=CE=D2=A3=AC=D3=EB=BA=C3=D3=D1=B7=D6=CF=ED=C9= =FA=BB=EE=A3=A1 =C1=CB=BD=E2=B8=FC=B6=E0=D0=C5=CF=A2=A3=A1=20

_______________________________________________
Ips mailing=20 = list
Ips@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips
------=_NextPart_000_002A_01C8C732.F388CC20-- --===============0031906969== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Ips mailing list Ips@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips --===============0031906969==-- From ips-bounces@ietf.org Fri Jun 6 12:47:03 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ips-archive@optimus.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-ips-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 649B03A6D9A; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 12:47:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: ips@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: ips@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 401AC3A6B39 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 12:47:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.265 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.265 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d5N7QhS0CC7j for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 12:47:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from outbound-mail-122.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-122.bluehost.com [67.222.38.22]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 30CD73A6D83 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 12:47:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 12224 invoked by uid 0); 6 Jun 2008 19:47:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box49.bluehost.com) (69.89.20.49) by outboundproxy4.bluehost.com with SMTP; 6 Jun 2008 19:47:10 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=weibeltech.com; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:Content-Transfer-Encoding:User-Agent:X-Identified-User:DomainKey-Status; b=klP+uB2krFMKRct4J1NbmceOXIeZwuH+Y87POQMuOzpZJJPkiCNe0VtxBxL1g9ahcApIO9n1pJGl4KGvsIsoMlMWgflnHCqLi6TF+0IsU39PZ8R/wtGhzTtQTdx9zuNK; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by box49.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1K4hu2-00043h-CJ for ips@ietf.org; Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:47:10 -0600 Received: from 72.19.152.198 ([72.19.152.198]) by weibeltech.com (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:47:10 -0600 Message-ID: <20080606134710.snbyj2j808cow0g8@weibeltech.com> Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:47:10 -0600 From: David Weibel To: ips@ietf.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.6) X-Identified-User: {1033:box49.bluehost.com:cpanelhorde:box49.bluehost.com} {sentby:program running on server} DomainKey-Status: no signature Subject: Re: [Ips] OSD over iSCSI (Eddy Quicksall) X-BeenThere: ips@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: IP Storage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: ips-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ips-bounces@ietf.org > I would like to test my target's support of long CDB's. So I'm > looking for an iSCSI initiator that will carry long CDB's and > hopefully an OSD version 2 file system (since OSD issues 200 > byte CDB's). Does anyone know of anything or work in progress? The Solaris iSCSI initiator will support long CDBs. Sun was using it to test an OSD driver about 3 years ago. I can dig up more specifics if your interested. _______________________________________________ Ips mailing list Ips@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips From ips-bounces@ietf.org Fri Jun 6 12:49:39 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ips-archive@optimus.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-ips-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C18228C1A3; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 12:49:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: ips@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: ips@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77CBA3A6CD1 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 12:49:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.686 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.686 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.913, BAYES_00=-2.599, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zK20XTGBq0BU for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 12:49:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fmailhost02.isp.att.net (fmailhost02.isp.att.net [207.115.11.52]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 868DC3A6DA7 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 12:49:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivvtdkv0981 (adsl-218-205-129.jax.bellsouth.net[68.218.205.129]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc02) with SMTP id <20080606194947H020041jbje>; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 19:49:47 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [68.218.205.129] Message-ID: <001801c8c80e$79a31f50$0602a8c0@ivivity.com> From: "Eddy Quicksall" To: "David Weibel" , References: <20080606134710.snbyj2j808cow0g8@weibeltech.com> Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 15:49:45 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Subject: Re: [Ips] OSD over iSCSI (Eddy Quicksall) X-BeenThere: ips@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: IP Storage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: ips-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ips-bounces@ietf.org Yea, if it is open source and there is a download then I would like to try it. Eddy ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Weibel" To: Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 3:47 PM Subject: Re: [Ips] OSD over iSCSI (Eddy Quicksall) >> I would like to test my target's support of long CDB's. So I'm >> looking for an iSCSI initiator that will carry long CDB's and >> hopefully an OSD version 2 file system (since OSD issues 200 >> byte CDB's). Does anyone know of anything or work in progress? > > The Solaris iSCSI initiator will support long CDBs. Sun was using > it to test an OSD driver about 3 years ago. I can dig up more > specifics if your interested. > > _______________________________________________ > Ips mailing list > Ips@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips > _______________________________________________ Ips mailing list Ips@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips From seungku@fujitsu.com Sun Jun 8 09:12:14 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ietfarch-ips-archive@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: ietfarch-ips-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E90E928C11A for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2008 09:12:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.761 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.761 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_99=3.5, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100=0.5, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100=1.5, RAZOR2_CHECK=0.5, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, RCVD_IN_XBL=3.033, RDNS_NONE=0.1, URIBL_AB_SURBL=10, URIBL_BLACK=20, URIBL_JP_SURBL=10, URIBL_OB_SURBL=10, URIBL_RHS_DOB=1.083, URIBL_SBL=20, URIBL_SC_SURBL=10, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l0GdkKTex22q for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2008 09:12:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 219-58.static.alkar.net (unknown [213.227.219.58]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C960D28C10A for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2008 09:12:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 14:25:41 +0000 Message-ID: <47640.keith@lin> From: "giancarlo wyatt" To: Subject: 90% lowered prices MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_HUW0eOQFYCleHB" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_HUW0eOQFYCleHB Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable My dear ips-archive, be a smart guy, buy your pills from the most = well-known shop. --=_HUW0eOQFYCleHB Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

My dear ips-archive, be a smart guy, buy your pills from the most well-known shop.

--=_HUW0eOQFYCleHB-- From ips-bounces@ietf.org Thu Jun 26 14:16:33 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ips-archive@optimus.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-ips-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41053A691D; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:16:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: ips@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: ips@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DEEE3A691D for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:16:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.184 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.184 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.185, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OQH3EtO3TkdK for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:16:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fmailhost04.isp.att.net (fmailhost04.isp.att.net [204.127.217.104]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E7103A67EF for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:16:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivvtdkv0981 (adsl-214-72-41.jax.bellsouth.net[68.214.72.41]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc04) with SMTP id <20080626211635H04009f5use>; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:16:36 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [68.214.72.41] Message-ID: <002a01c8d7d1$ea76cc90$0602a8c0@ivivity.com> From: "Eddy Quicksall" To: Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:16:35 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Subject: [Ips] Maximum Burst Size in Disconnect-Reconnect mode page X-BeenThere: ips@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: IP Storage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1020026071==" Sender: ips-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ips-bounces@ietf.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --===============1020026071== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0027_01C8D7B0.63011390" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C8D7B0.63011390 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In the Disconnect-Reconnect mode page there is a field called MAXIMUM = BURST SIZE. The rfc does not reference this field but I am wondering if = the field should be filled with a value computed from the negotiated = with MaxBurstLength. Eddy ------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C8D7B0.63011390 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In the Disconnect-Reconnect mode page there is a = field called=20 MAXIMUM BURST SIZE. The rfc does not reference this field but I am = wondering if=20 the field should be filled with a value computed from = the negotiated=20 with MaxBurstLength.
 
Eddy
------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C8D7B0.63011390-- --===============1020026071== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Ips mailing list Ips@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips --===============1020026071==-- From ips-bounces@ietf.org Sat Jun 28 21:49:29 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ips-archive@optimus.ietf.org Delivered-To: ietfarch-ips-archive@core3.amsl.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F51F3A6A0B; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 21:49:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-To: ips@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: ips@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3BE23A68A3; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 21:49:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PjgAXOHi0iyS; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 21:49:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mtagate5.de.ibm.com (mtagate5.de.ibm.com [195.212.29.154]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C42093A6A0B; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 21:49:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate5.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m5T4mLsa647780; Sun, 29 Jun 2008 04:48:21 GMT Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.0) with ESMTP id m5T4mLIL3461300; Sun, 29 Jun 2008 06:48:21 +0200 Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m5T4mKC2003229; Sun, 29 Jun 2008 06:48:21 +0200 Received: from d12mc102.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12mc102.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.114]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m5T4mKU5003226; Sun, 29 Jun 2008 06:48:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: <002a01c8d7d1$ea76cc90$0602a8c0@ivivity.com> References: <002a01c8d7d1$ea76cc90$0602a8c0@ivivity.com> To: "Eddy Quicksall" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-KeepSent: B1352BC6:A824EF39-C2257477:0019B399; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Build VMac_Beta85_20080115_MM2 January 15, 2008 From: Julian Satran Message-ID: Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 07:48:20 +0300 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D12MC102/12/M/IBM(Release 8.0.1|February 07, 2008) at 29/06/2008 07:48:20, Serialize complete at 29/06/2008 07:48:20 Cc: ips@ietf.org, ips-bounces@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Ips] Maximum Burst Size in Disconnect-Reconnect mode page X-BeenThere: ips@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: IP Storage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1203536230==" Sender: ips-bounces@ietf.org Errors-To: ips-bounces@ietf.org This is a multipart message in MIME format. --===============1203536230== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 001A64FFC2257477_=" This is a multipart message in MIME format. --=_alternative 001A64FFC2257477_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Eddy, The disconnect-reconnect mode page you are referring to is from the FCP standard (AFAIK). There are NO mode pages for iSCSI. Regards, Julo From: "Eddy Quicksall" To: Date: 06/27/08 12:18 AM Subject: [Ips] Maximum Burst Size in Disconnect-Reconnect mode page In the Disconnect-Reconnect mode page there is a field called MAXIMUM BURST SIZE. The rfc does not reference this field but I am wondering if the field should be filled with a value computed from the negotiated with MaxBurstLength. Eddy_______________________________________________ Ips mailing list Ips@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips --=_alternative 001A64FFC2257477_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Eddy,

The disconnect-reconnect mode page you are referring to is from the FCP standard (AFAIK). There are NO mode pages for iSCSI.

Regards,
Julo


From: "Eddy Quicksall" <Quicksall_iSCSI@Bellsouth.net>
To: <ips@ietf.org>
Date: 06/27/08 12:18 AM
Subject: [Ips] Maximum Burst Size in Disconnect-Reconnect mode page




In the Disconnect-Reconnect mode page there is a field called MAXIMUM BURST SIZE. The rfc does not reference this field but I am wondering if the field should be filled with a value computed from the negotiated with MaxBurstLength.
 
Eddy_______________________________________________
Ips mailing list
Ips@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips
--=_alternative 001A64FFC2257477_=-- --===============1203536230== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Ips mailing list Ips@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ips --===============1203536230==--