Subject: [IPsec] ikev2bis issue #182: Marking CP() as optional in early sections

From: Paul Hoffman <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:59:24 -0700

Sean Turner asks: Sec 1.2/2.19: Shouldn't "[CP()]" be in message 3 and 4 in Section 1.2?