Subject: [IPsec] progressing 4303

From: Stephen Kent <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 09:47:40 -0500

Same drill for 4303:

*The following questions document whether the syntax and semantics of the protocol were implemented:

- Which of the following ESP packet formats does your implementation support:
	- separate encryption and integrity algorithms:
	- combined mode algorithms:
- Which processing semantics does your implementation support:
	- Transport Mode:
	- Tunnel Mode:
	- Auditing:

The following questions document whether interoperability has been achieved as well as other intangibles the IESG will be interested:

- What evidence do you have that your implementation can interoperate with other implementations?

- In your opinion, are there unused features in the RFC that greatly increase implementation complexity?

- Errata was filed against RFC 4303 and has been included in**https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kent-ipsecme-esp-rfc4303bis/**; are any of the incorporated errata problematic for your implementation?

Additional information (optional):*