Subject: Re: [IPsec] IPsec Digest, Vol 137, Issue 6

From: Les Leposo <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 10:54:40 +0300

> On Sep 16, 2015, at 6:20 AM, [email-masked] wrote:
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 05:01:14 +0300
> From: Tero Kivinen <[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>>
> To: Tommy Pauly <[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>>
> Cc: IPsecME WG <[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>>
> Subject: [IPsec]  WG Interest in TCP Encapsulation
> Message-ID: <[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> Tommy Pauly writes:
>> I wanted to get a sense of WG interest in working on a standard for running
>> IKEv2/IPSec over a TCP (or TLS/TCP) connection to traverse networks that
>> currently block UDP traffic.
> 
> Before we made the UDP framentation document, our original plan was to
> run IKEv2 over TCP, just because that would solve this problem.
> 
> During this process we then found out that WG wanted to standardize
> UDP fragmentation instead of IKEv2 over TCP.
> 
> Is there really happend something that changes that?
> 
> The old informal poll can be found from 
> 
> http://marc.info/?t=136326093500003&r=1&w=1 <http://marc.info/?t=136326093500003&r=1&w=1>
> 

2013 was a long time ago (in terms of technology, security and usage trends), besides the group now seems to have broader (perhaps more diverse) participation.
imho, It’s time for a new poll and most probably a new/updated draft.

my $.02