Subject: Re: [IPsec] IKE_AUX comments

From: Paul Wouters <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2018 14:46:19 -0400 (EDT)

On Thu, 26 Jul 2018, Daniel Van Geest wrote:

> I do have one issue I’ve been pondering, though; we do an IKE_AUX exchange, and then follow it up with an IKE_AUTH

I agree, the name is not the best for verbal language.

> I have the same issue when discussing the draft.  Off the top of my head, IKE_PRE_AUTH could work.

I think IKE_PRE_AUTH is indeed better.

Other name could be: IKE_SUPP[LEMENT] or IKE_INIT_SUPP[LEMENT]

Paul