From nobody Tue May 26 08:49:55 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: iptel@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: iptel@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE4DF1AC3DC for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 08:49:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.912 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Za_ZED2L78v5 for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 08:49:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28BFD1A8A7F for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 08:49:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 6666D180207; Tue, 26 May 2015 08:47:37 -0700 (PDT) To: hgs@cs.columbia.edu, ben@nostrum.com, alissa@cooperw.in, jdrosen@cisco.com X-PHP-Originating-Script: 6000:errata_mail_lib.php From: RFC Errata System Message-Id: <20150526154737.6666D180207@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 08:47:37 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Cc: iptel@ietf.org, ietf.shinji@gmail.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [Iptel] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3966 (4376) X-BeenThere: iptel@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IP Telephony List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 15:49:46 -0000 The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3966, "The tel URI for Telephone Numbers". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3966&eid=4376 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: OKUMURA Shinji Section: 3 Original Text ------------- phonedigit = DIGIT / [ visual-separator ] phonedigit-hex = HEXDIG / "*" / "#" / [ visual-separator ] Corrected Text -------------- phonedigit = DIGIT / visual-separator; phonedigit-hex = HEXDIG / "*" / "#" / visual-separator; Notes ----- An optional and alternative rule is typically meaningless. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC3966 (draft-ietf-iptel-rfc2806bis-09) -------------------------------------- Title : The tel URI for Telephone Numbers Publication Date : December 2004 Author(s) : H. Schulzrinne Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : IP Telephony Area : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From nobody Tue May 26 09:09:34 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: iptel@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: iptel@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B1A91A9116 for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 09:09:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.225 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.225 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_MODEMCABLE=0.768, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PrEBap2ukcVt for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 09:09:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pacdcmhout01.cable.comcast.com (PACDCMHOUT01.cable.comcast.com [68.87.31.167]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 868D71B2BDA for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 09:09:27 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 44571fa7-f79216d000002c77-c6-55649ab5a954 Received: from PACDCEXHUB03.cable.comcast.com (dlpemail-wc-5p.sys.comcast.net [24.40.13.176]) (using TLS with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by pacdcmhout01.cable.comcast.com (SMTP Gateway) with SMTP id 53.38.11383.5BA94655; Tue, 26 May 2015 12:09:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from PACDCEXMB04.cable.comcast.com ([169.254.6.224]) by PACDCEXHUB03.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::7da6:458a:eadf:dadb%16]) with mapi id 14.03.0181.006; Tue, 26 May 2015 12:09:22 -0400 From: "Livingood, Jason" To: RFC Errata System , "hgs@cs.columbia.edu" , "ben@nostrum.com" , "alissa@cooperw.in" , "jdrosen@cisco.com" Thread-Topic: [Iptel] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3966 (4376) Thread-Index: AQHQl8ufYRTl7V8ZJEeeWgUX1+TLdZ2ObRSA Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 16:11:04 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20150526154737.6666D180207@rfc-editor.org> In-Reply-To: <20150526154737.6666D180207@rfc-editor.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.8.150116 x-originating-ip: [24.40.1.144] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <14113005F27FE54BBF856BC56D03AC62@cable.comcast.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Forward X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrHIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiocG7QXfbrJRQgyV7mCymn/nLaDG/8zS7 xZW+lUwWS/rXsFn0/zOwWH7wCrNF0/6vbA7sHlN+b2T1+PLkJZPH11sHmTx2zrrL7rFkyU8m j1k7n7B4NLQdYw1gj+KySUnNySxLLdK3S+DKmPPFoGAFX0XPthamBsbF3F2MHBwSAiYSU3fb dzFyApliEhfurWfrYuTiEBLYxiSxa/JUKOcQo8TaxUtYQarYBGwkpm87ygxiiwjcZpQ4+ZIR ZBCzQITE9nm6IGFhAXuJqcs3sEKUOEjcWv6BBcI2kjh89h8biM0ioCpxd2EvO4jNC1R/4fBx MFtIwFziwatPYDangIXE49ctYHMYgY77fmoNE4jNLCAucevJfCaIowUkluw5zwxhi0q8fPwP rF5UQE/i0KyPLBBxeYnmawegenUkFuz+xAZxsoPE1k2qEGFtiWULXzNDnCMocXLmE6hWcYnD R3awTmCUnIVk8ywkk2YhTJqFZNIsJJMWMLKuYpQrSExOSc7NyC8tMTDUS05MyknVS87PTU4s LgHRmxiBqcAlXH75DsZ7L5wOMQpwMCrx8MoAU4QQa2JZcWUuMA44mJVEeCu6gUK8KYmVValF +fFFpTmpxYcYpTlYlMR517UCpQTSE0tSs1NTC1KLYLJMHJxSDYzT1m1M2O5vtc/KrqY2OtN4 t8r6Fck8pe2mvwwu3zsjKCKo+Ue1YO2dk+9KtlaEh34/++ZlyGr5VSbLfbqqhYN+Lnx1VIqn /dK55/MPzfyhqPz7vH14gva8S2eYt+9l7ddk8PlVq+Gz1l53pobAdua90peNWI6u8XjDf6fr 1ceNGlPPxjeJ9vUrsRRnJBpqMRcVJwIAfxp5CQEDAAA= Archived-At: Cc: "iptel@ietf.org" , "ietf.shinji@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [Iptel] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3966 (4376) X-BeenThere: iptel@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IP Telephony List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 16:09:33 -0000 This errata should be rejected. - Jason On 5/26/15, 11:47 AM, "RFC Errata System" wrote: >The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3966, >"The tel URI for Telephone Numbers". > >-------------------------------------- >You may review the report below and at: >http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3D3966&eid=3D4376 > >-------------------------------------- >Type: Editorial >Reported by: OKUMURA Shinji > >Section: 3 > >Original Text >------------- >phonedigit =3D DIGIT / [ visual-separator ] >phonedigit-hex =3D HEXDIG / "*" / "#" / [ visual-separator ] > > >Corrected Text >-------------- >phonedigit =3D DIGIT / visual-separator; >phonedigit-hex =3D HEXDIG / "*" / "#" / visual-separator; > > >Notes >----- >An optional and alternative rule is typically meaningless. > >Instructions: >------------- >This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please >use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or >rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) >can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > >-------------------------------------- >RFC3966 (draft-ietf-iptel-rfc2806bis-09) >-------------------------------------- >Title : The tel URI for Telephone Numbers >Publication Date : December 2004 >Author(s) : H. Schulzrinne >Category : PROPOSED STANDARD >Source : IP Telephony >Area : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure >Stream : IETF >Verifying Party : IESG > >_______________________________________________ >Iptel mailing list >Iptel@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iptel > From nobody Sat May 30 16:28:01 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: iptel@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: iptel@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE7711ACDFD for ; Wed, 27 May 2015 04:30:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.899 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FSL_HELO_FAKE=3.899, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lr-kfDD6_9NQ for ; Wed, 27 May 2015 04:30:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pd0-x235.google.com (mail-pd0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EFA41ACDFB for ; Wed, 27 May 2015 04:30:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pdfh10 with SMTP id h10so10873593pdf.3 for ; Wed, 27 May 2015 04:30:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references:message-id; bh=QKdW0tEKpJeInxrzmEH5wJ9/dD1GAJ4jhMBw39ucK2Y=; b=lFscjODOAE8hSdvcuM0JJAxuxb6lJ7yHWw05Fo+A7/6cm5ORNTaaV0opo1EXnS+vTD u8ucMLLHzvykqCD9EZQyb8SHvlZnYi21mCGV4FD/ktVM9ObCK+wfekkhlc7iUh3HnPBR cu65rIZS31kl08DxJ5719Wn44u2xxka3CbsmODawTiVD+8ZHGPLXEyc1wV3vPIlhaQJk kYzzFXT7WGvpChfIYXVzj7Aaqcn7rt9U1hEyyRFqNyo8yV3hyZyeF+5XjPj5gZWOrW5d sOKsne50rW5CvhUBEUKN+od4zCj+q+sn8jZv0qICCBDIRNjw1i67pY643aqLJelX4IXV aGSQ== X-Received: by 10.68.235.38 with SMTP id uj6mr58054436pbc.57.1432726249136; Wed, 27 May 2015 04:30:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmail.com (softbank219041195068.bbtec.net. [219.41.195.68]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qi6sm15916292pbb.94.2015.05.27.04.30.45 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 27 May 2015 04:30:47 -0700 (PDT) From: OKUMURA Shinji To: "Livingood, Jason" , RFC Errata System , "hgs@cs.columbia.edu" , "ben@nostrum.com" , "alissa@cooperw.in" , "jdrosen@cisco.com" Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 20:30:37 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: HidemaruMail 6.45 (WinNT,601) In-Reply-To: References: <20150526154737.6666D180207@rfc-editor.org> Message-Id: Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 30 May 2015 16:28:00 -0700 Cc: "iptel@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Iptel] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC3966 (4376) X-BeenThere: iptel@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: IP Telephony List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 11:30:51 -0000 Hi, phonedigit is used in an extension rule. extension = ";ext=" 1*phonedigit if the original definition is correct, I think a following description is valid. tel:1234;ext=;phone-context=example.com May an extension number be an empty string? At the very start what is the reason why visual-separator became an optional rule? according to the document history, RFC2806 phonedigit = DIGIT / visual-separator draft-ietf-iptel-rfc2806bis-01 phonedigit = DIGIT [ visual-separator ] phonedigit-hex = HEXDIG [ visual-separator ] draft-ietf-iptel-rfc2806bis-02 phonedigit = DIGIT / [ visual-separator ] phonedigit-hex = HEXDIG / "*" / "#" / [ visual-separator ] Anydody know the intent of this fix? Regards, Shinji >This errata should be rejected. > >- Jason > > > >On 5/26/15, 11:47 AM, "RFC Errata System" >wrote: > >>The following errata report has been submitted for RFC3966, >>"The tel URI for Telephone Numbers". >> >>-------------------------------------- >>You may review the report below and at: >>http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3966&eid=4376 >> >>-------------------------------------- >>Type: Editorial >>Reported by: OKUMURA Shinji >> >>Section: 3 >> >>Original Text >>------------- >>phonedigit = DIGIT / [ visual-separator ] >>phonedigit-hex = HEXDIG / "*" / "#" / [ visual-separator ] >> >> >>Corrected Text >>-------------- >>phonedigit = DIGIT / visual-separator; >>phonedigit-hex = HEXDIG / "*" / "#" / visual-separator; >> >> >>Notes >>----- >>An optional and alternative rule is typically meaningless. >> >>Instructions: >>------------- >>This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please >>use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or >>rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) >>can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. >> >>-------------------------------------- >>RFC3966 (draft-ietf-iptel-rfc2806bis-09) >>-------------------------------------- >>Title : The tel URI for Telephone Numbers >>Publication Date : December 2004 >>Author(s) : H. Schulzrinne >>Category : PROPOSED STANDARD >>Source : IP Telephony >>Area : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure >>Stream : IETF >>Verifying Party : IESG >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Iptel mailing list >>Iptel@ietf.org >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iptel >>