Subject: RE: [Isms] Re: securityName/groupName

From: "Nelson, David" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:12:36 -0400

> Isn't CoA primarily addressing the network access use case wherein
> a session is established and re-authorization needs to happen because
> of some policy change. I am not sure the ISMS use case has a similar
> premise, wouldn't it be real stretch to extend CoA to ISMS.

I very much agree.

However there have been proposals floated in RADEXT to allow
Authorize-Only behavior in a wider context, beyond that of CoA.  That
may have been what Dave Harrington heard.  That extended Authorize-Only
usage is currently under debate in RADEXT and is considered
controversial.  

_______________________________________________
Isms mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms