Subject: RE: [Isms] #5: Should discuss management/monitoring needs in non-brokennetworks?

From: "Kaushik Narayan \(kaushik\)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 09:02:28 -0700

I think #4 & #5 could make a section that talks about impact and
recommendations of using session based security to SNMP, I think this
should be in broader spec (may be applicatability document).

-----Original Message-----
From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]]
On Behalf Of David B Harrington
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 2:49 PM
To: [email-masked]
Subject: [Isms] #5: Should discuss management/monitoring needs in
non-brokennetworks?

#5: Should the SSHSM document include a discussion of ways SNMP could be
extended to better support management/monitoring needs when a network is
running just fine, or can this be covered in the TMSM document, or in an
applicability document?

David Harrington
[email-masked]

_______________________________________________
Isms mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms

_______________________________________________
Isms mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms