Subject: RE: [Isms] tmsm issue #5: session table (p39)

From: "Sumanth Channabasappa" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 15:52:33 -0600

<snip>

Callback has been debated, and the WG has waffled between "this really
is needed for notifications when no session yet exists" to "we don't
care about this because there is no customer demand for this feature."

[s] I presume you mean call-home. IMHO it is important to support it
(based on feedback from Service Providers)

<snip>

- S

_______________________________________________
Isms mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isms