From j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de Mon Apr 4 12:15:55 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: isms@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: isms@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D413A6407 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 12:15:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.184 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.184 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.065, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g0R0HFyLs9jw for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 12:15:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de (hermes.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.23]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA34D3A63D2 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 12:15:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (demetrius3.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.48]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 211FBC0023; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 21:17:30 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de ([212.201.44.23]) by localhost (demetrius3.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hveyM5gwGUD3; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 21:17:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from elstar.local (elstar.jacobs.jacobs-university.de [10.50.231.133]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E12A2C0007; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 21:17:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: by elstar.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id D238817566A0; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 21:17:20 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 21:17:20 +0200 From: Juergen Schoenwaelder To: Sean Turner Message-ID: <20110404191719.GB48542@elstar.local> Mail-Followup-To: Sean Turner , isms@ietf.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: isms@ietf.org Subject: [Isms] Request to advance RFC 5343, RFC 5590, RFC 5591, RFC 5953 to Draft Standard X-BeenThere: isms@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder List-Id: Mailing list for the ISMS working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 19:15:55 -0000 Hi, I have posted a revised version of the implementation report for RFC 5343, RFC 5590, RFC 5591, and RFC 5953. http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-schoenw-isms-interoperability-report-01.txt We now have three implementations that successfully exchanged packets with each other. We also know that a fourth implementation is being worked on. Sean, I like to ask you to start the process to advance RFC 5343, RFC 5590, RFC 5591, and RFC 5953 to Draft Standard status. The RFCs seem to be in a good enough state to advance them without republishing them. Thanks to everybody who helped with the implementations and the interoperability testing. It is good to see that SNMP community still manages to get something like this done in a timely fashion, like in the "good old days of SNMP". /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 From turners@ieca.com Tue Apr 5 12:37:11 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: isms@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: isms@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D6593A698C for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 12:37:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.541 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.541 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.057, BAYES_00=-2.599, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dp4VNJD0W91q for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 12:37:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nm3-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm3-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.212.154]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1CC343A698A for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 12:37:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [98.139.212.151] by nm3.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Apr 2011 19:38:50 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.233] by tm8.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Apr 2011 19:38:50 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1042.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Apr 2011 19:38:50 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 776553.60651.bm@omp1042.mail.bf1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 70458 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2011 19:38:50 -0000 Received: from thunderfish.local (turners@96.231.128.71 with plain) by smtp113.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 05 Apr 2011 12:38:50 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: ZrP3VLSswBDL75pF8ymZHDSu9B.vcMfDPgLJ X-YMail-OSG: 5u0EODgVM1mv6dYDbqu.BDaam89i1uEOch9d65qsKRPrvK9 G1zmUFvgbrHNZ1cm5C1QmDGfoMK1yzF7AVYJsYYzKN0iGuq0YnhkZpFUvHme LVblG8.vdzvQYPO8YVTv92AzVqpzAH46oQYwtp0nx1EFsWT9hg3fYWH0Ilfb IATx8OpZ7mhoLzjtFyOc5r7XCzwBStcxE8gVEnkQx2FlT.co7KLTU2lRVxAJ rQEUMvgqYnpbXstPpmwi.QQOLpwvTSOT0ehAvd0WJIveZUD91SAvijB10i4Q LbDiS3JxO_wYWjVQ.yO46VUP.DURwLuFrqCZYNB6TM5PoglwqUkzkTmAyGGj 1rTAei53bad7lMFUtIaAthEC_XQgcSuVA3Wbx4B.8 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <4D9B6FC9.5050307@ieca.com> Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 15:38:49 -0400 From: Sean Turner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isms@ietf.org References: <20110404191719.GB48542@elstar.local> In-Reply-To: <20110404191719.GB48542@elstar.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Isms] Request to advance RFC 5343, RFC 5590, RFC 5591, RFC 5953 to Draft Standard X-BeenThere: isms@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the ISMS working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 19:37:11 -0000 Just a heads up: I was poking around in the tracker and noted that 5343 came from OPSAWG. I contacted Dan (responsible AD) and noted that we're looking to progress one of his documents. He wants to check that there are no issues with the WG (he didn't think there would be any). Also, since it's Dan's doc - he'll be the one actually issuing the IETF LC for it - but we'll coordinate closely to make sure they all happen at the same time. spt On 4/4/11 3:17 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > Hi, > > I have posted a revised version of the implementation report for RFC > 5343, RFC 5590, RFC 5591, and RFC 5953. > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-schoenw-isms-interoperability-report-01.txt > > We now have three implementations that successfully exchanged packets > with each other. We also know that a fourth implementation is being > worked on. > > Sean, I like to ask you to start the process to advance RFC 5343, RFC > 5590, RFC 5591, and RFC 5953 to Draft Standard status. The RFCs seem > to be in a good enough state to advance them without republishing them. > > Thanks to everybody who helped with the implementations and the > interoperability testing. It is good to see that SNMP community still > manages to get something like this done in a timely fashion, like in > the "good old days of SNMP". > > /js > From turners@ieca.com Mon Apr 18 07:18:04 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: isms@ietfc.amsl.com Delivered-To: isms@ietfc.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D7E2E0700 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 07:18:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.294 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.294 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.110, BAYES_40=-0.185, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ASAYEtjgusnz for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 07:18:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nm7.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm7.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.212.166]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A12FAE06D6 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 07:18:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [98.139.212.152] by nm7.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Apr 2011 14:18:00 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.234] by tm9.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Apr 2011 14:18:00 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1043.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Apr 2011 14:18:00 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 330242.6786.bm@omp1043.mail.bf1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 19025 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2011 14:18:00 -0000 Received: from thunderfish.local (turners@71.191.15.68 with plain) by smtp105.biz.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Apr 2011 07:18:00 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: ZrP3VLSswBDL75pF8ymZHDSu9B.vcMfDPgLJ X-YMail-OSG: vfCYDQUVM1n78eLfcVjvFkvtDUmCyj_rPSzoj5Exfet1I20 Lg6tmdpx5BORasP108MKTAfLFy98HNiWkTYNAq9VWLDyVURGT_S1qYauexZE tXPkv0ziSwYnI150LcpUyQ1vrmct_McFa.wVVBx3XmjvkFLnCo9Qm8T3aExV 7N8TNEhgnIG.IE4Yj5C4wEaxKEKOEPFlm2zfyQmnb0PUL6JtLgC5wK0Q35V_ k6mFHnAXFi9tLUFZxneCBITN3BzaZx9yj5KLEGbZxdbyXAtMSieeDS2U9EAx sQjx9GWbCALfDl6vsChe2.QJfLkcdmnGpjUemeBPhCs7xRwmyxRC3_yvDvgA ThKqap1qd9JlwJAS4UyY8 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <4DAC4817.8010104@ieca.com> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 10:17:59 -0400 From: Sean Turner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isms@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Isms] Implementation Report Published X-BeenThere: isms@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the ISMS working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:18:04 -0000 The IESG Secretary has posted the implementation report: http://www.ietf.org/iesg/implementation-report.html spt From wjhns1@hardakers.net Mon Apr 18 07:34:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: isms@ietfc.amsl.com Delivered-To: isms@ietfc.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3B73E07F9 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 07:34:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id telWlUTxoXWt for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 07:34:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.236.43]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2271E07F8 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 07:34:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (75-101-64-22.dsl.dynamic.omsoft.com [75.101.64.22]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F34C96F; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 07:34:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Wes Hardaker To: Sean Turner References: <4DAC4817.8010104@ieca.com> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 07:33:59 -0700 In-Reply-To: <4DAC4817.8010104@ieca.com> (Sean Turner's message of "Mon, 18 Apr 2011 10:17:59 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110012 (No Gnus v0.12) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: isms@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Isms] IsmsImplementation Report Published X-BeenThere: isms@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the ISMS working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:34:34 -0000 >>>>> On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 10:17:59 -0400, Sean Turner said: ST> The IESG Secretary has posted the implementation report: I think you mean "interoperability report", which is one better than an implementation ;-) Sounds like it's time to get the IESG thinking about updating the status. Hopefully Juergen will ask for this soon? -- Wes Hardaker Cobham Analytic Solutions From turners@ieca.com Mon Apr 18 07:45:48 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: isms@ietfc.amsl.com Delivered-To: isms@ietfc.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36C16E068E for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 07:45:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.165 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.165 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.433, BAYES_00=-2.599, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EyGFXYP9HXza for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 07:45:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nm5-vm0.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm5-vm0.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.90.251]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A28DCE06D9 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 07:45:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [98.138.90.52] by nm5.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Apr 2011 14:45:42 -0000 Received: from [98.138.89.251] by tm5.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Apr 2011 14:45:42 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1043.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Apr 2011 14:45:42 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 417856.97716.bm@omp1043.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 9701 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2011 14:45:40 -0000 Received: from thunderfish.local (turners@71.191.15.68 with plain) by smtp112.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Apr 2011 07:45:39 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: ZrP3VLSswBDL75pF8ymZHDSu9B.vcMfDPgLJ X-YMail-OSG: IC6D5YwVM1nehL7EFfRAPelGoSBYAg34CQipOQrYDUPmrJM U3WYFk4umzk5MU863W7TJa2mQFreXWKJGpmG5E0B3vG7EhjvsAxGsU3MRkqo uJMwEZVB..oeQWhBKtogPOktCJgNSEcm8FCSgweDZDhYSh2vGV7U5_kVGRg3 ixDKEGP.388tNZ6f3GAX6ffn0s2AQmwHrT8D1YzUhqqfDCGwz2P0dPOXkMAg leNqrw7GbXgdun9X7BslSaBNPO73mdug9M4yNXLIqReSPktIXEo6WUb4GQ_8 6nNrseywG4hEBQw52PSqF04DtYhXcZ_MIam_pCX1ZUr3u.sLIDAwo9oGkGZd IaSLU2S6lV7FWKW9nm9I2v06jY5Xnk8LYUZVjqkW3wLw- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <4DAC4E91.1040606@ieca.com> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 10:45:37 -0400 From: Sean Turner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wes Hardaker References: <4DAC4817.8010104@ieca.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: isms@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Isms] IsmsImplementation Report Published X-BeenThere: isms@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the ISMS working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:45:48 -0000 Working on issuing the IETF LCs ;) spt On 4/18/11 10:33 AM, Wes Hardaker wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 10:17:59 -0400, Sean Turner said: > > ST> The IESG Secretary has posted the implementation report: > > I think you mean "interoperability report", which is one better than an > implementation ;-) > > Sounds like it's time to get the IESG thinking about updating the > status. Hopefully Juergen will ask for this soon? From wjhns1@hardakers.net Mon Apr 18 07:48:24 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: isms@ietfc.amsl.com Delivered-To: isms@ietfc.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B09D8E07FF for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 07:48:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CQWHGpoyRJ10 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 07:48:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.236.43]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6C91E07FE for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 07:48:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (75-101-64-22.dsl.dynamic.omsoft.com [75.101.64.22]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C4A1A75; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 07:47:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Wes Hardaker To: Sean Turner References: <4DAC4817.8010104@ieca.com> <4DAC4E91.1040606@ieca.com> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 07:47:51 -0700 In-Reply-To: <4DAC4E91.1040606@ieca.com> (Sean Turner's message of "Mon, 18 Apr 2011 10:45:37 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110012 (No Gnus v0.12) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: isms@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Isms] IsmsImplementation Report Published X-BeenThere: isms@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the ISMS working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:48:25 -0000 >>>>> On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 10:45:37 -0400, Sean Turner said: ST> Working on issuing the IETF LCs ;) Fantastic! -- Wes Hardaker Cobham Analytic Solutions From wwwrun@ietfc.amsl.com Tue Apr 19 14:14:56 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: isms@ietf.org Delivered-To: isms@ietfc.amsl.com Received: by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 30) id 203DAE084A; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 14:14:56 -0700 (PDT) X-idtracker: yes To: IETF-Announce From: The IESG Message-Id: <20110419211456.203DAE084A@ietfc.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 14:14:56 -0700 (PDT) Cc: isms@ietf.org Subject: [Isms] Last Call: rfc5953 (Transport Layer Security (TLS) Transport Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)) to Draft Standard X-BeenThere: isms@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org List-Id: Mailing list for the ISMS working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 21:14:56 -0000 The IESG has received a request from the isms WG (isms) to consider the following document: - 'Transport Layer Security (TLS) Transport Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) ' RFC 5953 as a Draft Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2011-05-03. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. This specification contains eight normative references to standards track documents of lower maturity: RFCs 1033, 3490, 3584, 4347, 4366, 5246, 5280, and 5952. The file can be obtained via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc5953/ Implementation Report can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/iesg/implementation.html IESG discussion can be tracked via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc5953/ From wwwrun@ietfc.amsl.com Tue Apr 19 14:18:59 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: isms@ietf.org Delivered-To: isms@ietfc.amsl.com Received: by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 30) id 28AC8E081F; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 14:18:59 -0700 (PDT) X-idtracker: yes To: IETF-Announce From: The IESG Message-Id: <20110419211859.28AC8E081F@ietfc.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 14:18:59 -0700 (PDT) Cc: isms@ietf.org Subject: [Isms] Last Call: rfc5590 (Transport Subsystem for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)) to Draft Standard X-BeenThere: isms@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org List-Id: Mailing list for the ISMS working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 21:18:59 -0000 The IESG has received a request from the isms WG (isms) to consider the following document: - 'Transport Subsystem for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) ' RFC 5590 as a Draft Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2011-05-03. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. The file can be obtained via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc5590/ The interoperability report obtained via http://www.ietf.org/iesg/implementation/report-rfc5343-5590-5591-5953.txt IESG discussion can be tracked via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc5590/ From wwwrun@ietfc.amsl.com Tue Apr 19 14:21:59 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: isms@ietf.org Delivered-To: isms@ietfc.amsl.com Received: by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 30) id 9FC79E08AD; Tue, 19 Apr 2011 14:21:59 -0700 (PDT) X-idtracker: yes To: IETF-Announce From: The IESG Message-Id: <20110419212159.9FC79E08AD@ietfc.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 14:21:59 -0700 (PDT) Cc: isms@ietf.org Subject: [Isms] Last Call: rfc5591 (Transport Security Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)) to Draft Standard X-BeenThere: isms@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org List-Id: Mailing list for the ISMS working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 21:21:59 -0000 The IESG has received a request from the isms WG (isms) to consider the following document: - 'Transport Security Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)' RFC 5591 as a Draft Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2011-05-03. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Note that an IETF Last Call to progress RFC 5590 to Draft Standard is also underway (which would have been a downref). The file can be obtained via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc5591/ Implementation Report can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/iesg/implementation.html IESG discussion can be tracked via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc5591/ From turners@ieca.com Wed Apr 20 08:02:38 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: isms@ietfc.amsl.com Delivered-To: isms@ietfc.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC1F9E07B2 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 08:02:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.331 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.331 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.267, BAYES_00=-2.599, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7W6feKl-pcds for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 08:02:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nm29-vm0.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm29-vm0.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.91.43]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 46D7DE0780 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 08:02:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [98.138.90.48] by nm29.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Apr 2011 15:02:31 -0000 Received: from [98.138.89.162] by tm1.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Apr 2011 15:02:31 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1018.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Apr 2011 15:02:31 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 361975.60603.bm@omp1018.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 43364 invoked from network); 20 Apr 2011 15:02:31 -0000 Received: from thunderfish.local (turners@96.231.128.93 with plain) by smtp111.biz.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Apr 2011 08:02:30 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: ZrP3VLSswBDL75pF8ymZHDSu9B.vcMfDPgLJ X-YMail-OSG: zZIGY14VM1nX6XI.puCt3K7IdHxovn_JBlkthqBDXi_dkub V_f.8gCOz6sd.3G2OzY.zSYrAba.9Ybjwd2i_QDf8z4Nkoxfeu7p75CPgfLZ 9onCtIp7cH5.K.TKgpHLv_Au.ELL9PF1Ta9iCkPYsAXm0poMIRe9xVzJQf_D 9Os.ut_9wiX.IQNO8ZpHmNq4CspYo8DruibZn_o7vQsDWd0NyuXHq3nOi0E4 O9HoNpQpZhmj03H6j2a29ZFTHcEsIK3VcxH0066f1ykYP8NHqhTORS2ZqybS HAEbXgSGbnmOZqW_7pXuHzdF1kOmYujJq0z5kFZY926cNYAMXboSRYl.1t0F 7PiY4L5zzcnoKVQnMOns2Y9g- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <4DAEF583.60008@ieca.com> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 11:02:27 -0400 From: Sean Turner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isms@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Isms] Fwd: Last Call: rfc5343 (Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Context EngineID Discovery) to Draft Standard X-BeenThere: isms@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the ISMS working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 15:02:39 -0000 In case you missed it. spt -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Last Call: rfc5343 (Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Context EngineID Discovery) to Draft Standard Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 14:39:36 -0700 (PDT) From: The IESG Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org To: IETF-Announce CC: opsawg@ietf.org The IESG has received a request from the opsawg WG (opsawg) to consider the following document: - 'Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Context EngineID Discovery ' RFC 5343 as a Draft Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2011-05-03. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. The file can be obtained via http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5343.txt Implementation Report can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/iesg/implementation.html IESG discussion can be tracked via https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=5343&rfc_flag=1 _______________________________________________ IETF-Announce mailing list IETF-Announce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce