From wwwrun@rfc-editor.org Wed Jul 20 15:59:48 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: isms@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: isms@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A36021F8AED; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:59:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.155 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.155 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.155, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_93=0.6, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5UmT1veKhYkd; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:59:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E57B621F8B09; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:59:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id E0DEC98C518; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:59:43 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Message-Id: <20110720225943.E0DEC98C518@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:59:43 -0700 (PDT) Cc: isms@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [Isms] RFC 6353 on Transport Layer Security (TLS) Transport Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) X-BeenThere: isms@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the ISMS working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 22:59:48 -0000 A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 6353 Title: Transport Layer Security (TLS) Transport Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Author: W. Hardaker Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: July 2011 Mailbox: ietf@hardakers.net Pages: 65 Characters: 148571 Obsoletes: RFC5953 I-D Tag: RFC 5953 URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6353.txt This document describes a Transport Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP), that uses either the Transport Layer Security protocol or the Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) protocol. The TLS and DTLS protocols provide authentication and privacy services for SNMP applications. This document describes how the TLS Transport Model (TLSTM) implements the needed features of an SNMP Transport Subsystem to make this protection possible in an interoperable way. This Transport Model is designed to meet the security and operational needs of network administrators. It supports the sending of SNMP messages over TLS/TCP and DTLS/UDP. The TLS mode can make use of TCP's improved support for larger packet sizes and the DTLS mode provides potentially superior operation in environments where a connectionless (e.g., UDP) transport is preferred. Both TLS and DTLS integrate well into existing public keying infrastructures. This document also defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols. In particular, it defines objects for managing the TLS Transport Model for SNMP. [STANDARDS-TRACK] This document is a product of the Integrated Security Model for SNMP Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Draft Standard Protocol. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community,and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Internet Official Protocol Standards (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html. For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html. Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC From wjhns1@hardakers.net Wed Jul 20 21:09:13 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: isms@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: isms@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0BE21F85CE for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 21:09:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DrCSFobaZuuv for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 21:09:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.236.43]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C516521F85C7 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 21:09:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (wjh.hardakers.net [10.0.0.2]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 044C25A9 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 21:08:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Wes Hardaker To: isms@ietf.org References: <20110720225943.E0DEC98C518@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 21:08:39 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20110720225943.E0DEC98C518@rfc-editor.org> (rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org's message of "Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:59:43 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Isms] IsmsRFC 6353 on Transport Layer Security (TLS) Transport Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) X-BeenThere: isms@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list for the ISMS working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 04:09:13 -0000 >>>>> On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:59:43 -0700 (PDT), rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org said: r> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. r> RFC 6353 Thanks very much to all the companies that worked on implementations and interoperability reports that made this (and the previous RFCs) possible! -- Wes Hardaker SPARTA, Inc. From j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de Wed Jul 20 21:56:36 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: isms@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: isms@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E56E21F853E for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 21:56:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.821 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.821 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.428, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9WwVuRKP9csN for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 21:56:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de (hermes.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 194C521F853B for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 21:56:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (demetrius1.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.46]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FAB020BF3; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 06:56:29 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de ([212.201.44.23]) by localhost (demetrius1.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F50tLqv9zD78; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 06:56:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from elstar.local (elstar.jacobs.jacobs-university.de [10.50.231.133]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 217E620BF2; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 06:56:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: by elstar.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 9E9991A116BD; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 06:56:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 06:56:24 +0200 From: Juergen Schoenwaelder To: Wes Hardaker Message-ID: <20110721045624.GA87634@elstar.local> Mail-Followup-To: Wes Hardaker , isms@ietf.org References: <20110720225943.E0DEC98C518@rfc-editor.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: isms@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Isms] IsmsRFC 6353 on Transport Layer Security (TLS) Transport Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) X-BeenThere: isms@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder List-Id: Mailing list for the ISMS working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 04:56:36 -0000 On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 09:08:39PM -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote: > >>>>> On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:59:43 -0700 (PDT), rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org said: > > r> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. > > r> RFC 6353 > > Thanks very much to all the companies that worked on implementations and > interoperability reports that made this (and the previous RFCs) possible! I like to second that. The work on the interoperability report revealed much of the "old" SNMP spirit of getting things "up and running". Thanks to everyone involved and a task well completed. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103