
From jefsey@jefsey.com  Sun Jul  8 13:04:09 2012
Return-Path: <jefsey@jefsey.com>
X-Original-To: iucg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iucg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E896721F8668 for <iucg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun,  8 Jul 2012 13:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.999
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hPFD3hmQmacS for <iucg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun,  8 Jul 2012 13:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from m169.montage2.altserver.com (m169.montage2.altserver.com [72.34.52.169]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 608F221F869D for <iucg@ietf.org>; Sun,  8 Jul 2012 13:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from i03v-62-35-238-138.d4.club-internet.fr ([62.35.238.138]:65054 helo=MORFIN-PC.jefsey.com) by montage2.altserver.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from <jefsey@jefsey.com>) id 1SnxiZ-0003lG-L4 for iucg@ietf.org; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 13:04:32 -0700
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2012 22:01:27 +0200
To: "iucg@ietf.org" <iucg@ietf.org>
From: JFC Morfin <jefsey@jefsey.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - montage2.altserver.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jefsey.com
X-Source: 
X-Source-Args: 
X-Source-Dir: 
Message-Id: <20120708200409.608F221F869D@ietfa.amsl.com>
Subject: [iucg] Internet+ and IUTF drafts
X-BeenThere: iucg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: internet users contributing group <iucg@ietf.org>
List-Id: internet users contributing group <iucg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iucg>, <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/iucg>
List-Post: <mailto:iucg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iucg>, <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2012 20:04:10 -0000

I will try to update these drafts this month:
- http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-iucg-internet-plus-10.txt
- http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-iucg-iutf-tasks-01.txt

Then, I would plan to start working on a prototype interbox 
developped in Erlang and using CouchDB as an integrated NoSQL 
database slot. Next slots could be a DNS protocol, ML-DNS basic 
functionnalities (IDNApp) and a NIC management support.

1. comments on the Drafts are welcome.
2. interest in working on the interbox architecture/development or 
comments are welcome.

Until mid-July I will keep this internal to IUCG.
jfc


From psuger@gmail.com  Sun Jul  8 14:08:13 2012
Return-Path: <psuger@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: iucg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iucg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FA9021F859B for <iucg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun,  8 Jul 2012 14:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.932
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.932 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SARE_HTML_USL_OBFU=1.666]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l6LXWh5oVM9C for <iucg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun,  8 Jul 2012 14:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B80C21F8568 for <iucg@ietf.org>; Sun,  8 Jul 2012 14:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obbwc20 with SMTP id wc20so20950034obb.31 for <iucg@ietf.org>; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 14:08:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=WMvDyO7Pogu6ak9NhKjjz31TE2zhIUxYfG7bl0MPAMc=; b=F4vrhWD4X9m5bTKo5pB5wFLGKXBOKraQME59taDf2TYq6wXf+9WJYko34hHer8+ZNt dT2Fe4pcvdC5dDeP0o47akat+FKHE315s1515x0P71qFYcomr3m0Ekv3iW4uOaThTeOz bz7KKuJkVNlWW+FYxWKoLpfM/ad9UqnjR704v8AhsHpaBaYoZXGcl4N5EXlcMpKDMvBg 1F3UnpVz3lnHiO+8k0Dfln/uauVBQEbRrzPnTrSF35UIlm8HwYBv0wzz+IJlFfQrdbtY LIfDzTLiCQ6i+HnV2GVRZUn9/IbjZ6y+PE7nOLIm0N/DBTZ+qtM+i2scZ3Qx2s4aJMQn KJ/Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.26.65 with SMTP id j1mr39996964oeg.9.1341781715340; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 14:08:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.161.36 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Jul 2012 14:08:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120708200409.608F221F869D@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20120708200409.608F221F869D@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 23:08:35 +0200
Message-ID: <CAA=tpDBwj-z9BOfU1GC1UuHUZUuxPy6dZS8mXwuAqkR5pXtdSw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Patrick Suger <psuger@gmail.com>
To: internet users contributing group <iucg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8fb1eef4824e9704c457e687
Subject: Re: [iucg] Internet+ and IUTF drafts
X-BeenThere: iucg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: internet users contributing group <iucg@ietf.org>
List-Id: internet users contributing group <iucg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iucg>, <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/iucg>
List-Post: <mailto:iucg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iucg>, <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2012 21:08:13 -0000

--e89a8fb1eef4824e9704c457e687
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I understand that when you speak of an interbox you use the word as a
generic term and do not relate the concept to any specific programmation
language.
PSuger


2012/7/8 JFC Morfin <jefsey@jefsey.com>

> I will try to update these drafts this month:
> - http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-**iucg-internet-plus-10.txt<http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-iucg-internet-plus-10.txt>
> - http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-**iucg-iutf-tasks-01.txt<http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-iucg-iutf-tasks-01.txt>
>
> Then, I would plan to start working on a prototype interbox developped in
> Erlang and using CouchDB as an integrated NoSQL database slot. Next slots
> could be a DNS protocol, ML-DNS basic functionnalities (IDNApp) and a NIC
> management support.
>
> 1. comments on the Drafts are welcome.
> 2. interest in working on the interbox architecture/development or
> comments are welcome.
>
> Until mid-July I will keep this internal to IUCG.
> jfc
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> iucg mailing list
> iucg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/iucg<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iucg>
>

--e89a8fb1eef4824e9704c457e687
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I understand that when you speak of an interbox you use the word as a gener=
ic term and do not relate the concept to any specific programmation languag=
e.<br>PSuger<br><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2012/7/8 JFC Morfin <spa=
n dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:jefsey@jefsey.com" target=3D"_blank">je=
fsey@jefsey.com</a>&gt;</span><br>

<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I will try to update these drafts this month=
:<br>
- <a href=3D"http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-iucg-internet-plus-10.txt" target=
=3D"_blank">http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-<u></u>iucg-internet-plus-10.txt</=
a><br>
- <a href=3D"http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-iucg-iutf-tasks-01.txt" target=3D=
"_blank">http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-<u></u>iucg-iutf-tasks-01.txt</a><br>
<br>
Then, I would plan to start working on a prototype interbox developped in E=
rlang and using CouchDB as an integrated NoSQL database slot. Next slots co=
uld be a DNS protocol, ML-DNS basic functionnalities (IDNApp) and a NIC man=
agement support.<br>


<br>
1. comments on the Drafts are welcome.<br>
2. interest in working on the interbox architecture/development or comments=
 are welcome.<br>
<br>
Until mid-July I will keep this internal to IUCG.<br>
jfc<br>
<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
iucg mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:iucg@ietf.org" target=3D"_blank">iucg@ietf.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iucg" target=3D"_blank">ht=
tps://www.ietf.org/mailman/<u></u>listinfo/iucg</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>

--e89a8fb1eef4824e9704c457e687--

From jefsey@jefsey.com  Sun Jul  8 15:04:51 2012
Return-Path: <jefsey@jefsey.com>
X-Original-To: iucg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iucg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C96B21F8737 for <iucg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun,  8 Jul 2012 15:04:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.999
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.999, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_110=0.6, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5A0f8XQzJg6p for <iucg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun,  8 Jul 2012 15:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from m169.montage2.altserver.com (m169.montage2.altserver.com [72.34.52.169]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CEEB21F873E for <iucg@ietf.org>; Sun,  8 Jul 2012 15:04:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from i03v-62-35-238-138.d4.club-internet.fr ([62.35.238.138]:59455 helo=MORFIN-PC.jefsey.com) by montage2.altserver.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from <jefsey@jefsey.com>) id 1SnzbE-0001ro-RA; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 15:05:06 -0700
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 00:05:00 +0200
To: internet users contributing group <iucg@ietf.org>, internet users contributing group <iucg@ietf.org>
From: JFC Morfin <jefsey@jefsey.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA=tpDBwj-z9BOfU1GC1UuHUZUuxPy6dZS8mXwuAqkR5pXtdSw@mail.g mail.com>
References: <20120708200409.608F221F869D@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAA=tpDBwj-z9BOfU1GC1UuHUZUuxPy6dZS8mXwuAqkR5pXtdSw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====================_176777946==.ALT"
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - montage2.altserver.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jefsey.com
X-Source: 
X-Source-Args: 
X-Source-Dir: 
Message-Id: <20120708220450.7CEEB21F873E@ietfa.amsl.com>
Subject: Re: [iucg] Internet+ and IUTF drafts
X-BeenThere: iucg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: internet users contributing group <iucg@ietf.org>
List-Id: internet users contributing group <iucg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iucg>, <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/iucg>
List-Post: <mailto:iucg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iucg>, <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2012 22:04:51 -0000

--=====================_176777946==.ALT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

At 23:08 08/07/2012, Patrick Suger wrote:
>I understand that when you speak of an interbox you use the word as 
>a generic term and do not relate the concept to any specific 
>programmation language.
>PSuger

Correct.

Actually, the ICANN mess with vTLDs and  the strategy of Vint Cerf as 
I perceive it with  Public DNS and Google+ (which actually follow and 
test the Internet+ vision with all the power of Google) lead me to 
think that the best way to implement the Internet+ is to consider it 
as an actual independent addition to the Internet. With its 
documentation by the IUTF, on top of the IETF, the fringe to fringe 
stratum being managed as "inter-boxes" services and the ML-DNS being 
implemented as an SDNS (semantic digital naming system) supporting 
the SAS (semantic addressing system). This way, whatever the 
Value-Added stratum (VAS) keeps separated from the Extended Services 
(ESS) one, and does not care about the technology being used there.

This gives more time, prevents a take-over of a "DNS+" by invaders, 
disconnects the IETF from the IUTF as the ITU is disconnected from 
the ITU, and simplifies the I+ Governance.

So, my personal focus is prototyping ALFA (Architecture Libre/Free 
Architecture) from Internet+ to Intersem as an "alfasem" (system) of 
"alfabox"es, and develop  specialised "alfaslots" as proofs of 
concepts. The next common interest I_Ds are:

- the Intertest charter, so there is no confusion when using the 
Internet as a VAS test-bed or moving on top of any kind of future internet
- a cross-technology/system SDNS syntax for the whole digital ecosystem
- UNINUM, a universal numbering plan integrating IPv6 as well.
- some conceptual framework for the intergrams as a generalization of 
the directly adressable datagrams family.

This is why I would like to give-up the Internet+ architectural 
framework concepts as an I_D until we can prove it as operationnal at 
both fringes within the IUTF arena. Just to focus on INTLNET to make 
it the secretariat of the IUSG/IUTF until the I+Governance may organize.

jfc


>2012/7/8 JFC Morfin <<mailto:jefsey@jefsey.com>jefsey@jefsey.com>
>I will try to update these drafts this month:
>- 
><http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-iucg-internet-plus-10.txt>http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-iucg-internet-plus-10.txt
>- http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-iucg-iutf-tasks-01.txt
>
>Then, I would plan to start working on a prototype interbox 
>developped in Erlang and using CouchDB as an integrated NoSQL 
>database slot. Next slots could be a DNS protocol, ML-DNS basic 
>functionnalities (IDNApp) and a NIC management support.
>
>1. comments on the Drafts are welcome.
>2. interest in working on the interbox architecture/development or 
>comments are welcome.
>
>Until mid-July I will keep this internal to IUCG.
>jfc
>
>_______________________________________________
>iucg mailing list
><mailto:iucg@ietf.org>iucg@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iucg
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>iucg mailing list
>iucg@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iucg

--=====================_176777946==.ALT
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"

<html>
<body>
At 23:08 08/07/2012, Patrick Suger wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">I understand that when you speak
of an interbox you use the word as a generic term and do not relate the
concept to any specific programmation language.<br>
PSuger</blockquote><br>
Correct. <br><br>
Actually, the ICANN mess with vTLDs and&nbsp; the strategy of Vint Cerf
as I perceive it with&nbsp; Public DNS and Google+ (which actually follow
and test the Internet+ vision with all the power of Google) lead me to
think that the best way to implement the Internet+ is to consider it as
an actual independent addition to the Internet. With its documentation by
the IUTF, on top of the IETF, the fringe to fringe stratum being managed
as &quot;inter-boxes&quot; services and the ML-DNS being implemented as
an SDNS (semantic digital naming system) supporting the SAS (semantic
addressing system). This way, whatever the Value-Added stratum (VAS)
keeps separated from the Extended Services (ESS) one, and does not care
about the technology being used there.<br><br>
This gives more time, prevents a take-over of a &quot;DNS+&quot; by
invaders, disconnects the IETF from the IUTF as the ITU is disconnected
from the ITU, and simplifies the I+ Governance.<br><br>
So, my personal focus is prototyping ALFA (Architecture Libre/Free
Architecture) from Internet+ to Intersem as an &quot;alfasem&quot;
(system) of &quot;alfabox&quot;es, and develop&nbsp; specialised
&quot;alfaslots&quot; as proofs of concepts. The next common interest
I_Ds are:<br><br>
- the Intertest charter, so there is no confusion when using the Internet
as a VAS test-bed or moving on top of any kind of future internet<br>
- a cross-technology/system SDNS syntax for the whole digital
ecosystem<br>
- UNINUM, a universal numbering plan integrating IPv6 as well.<br>
- some conceptual framework for the intergrams as a generalization of the
directly adressable datagrams family.<br><br>
This is why I would like to give-up the Internet+ architectural framework
concepts as an I_D until we can prove it as operationnal at both fringes
within the IUTF arena. Just to focus on INTLNET to make it the
secretariat of the IUSG/IUTF until the I+Governance may
organize.<br><br>
jfc<br><br>
<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">2012/7/8 JFC Morfin
&lt;<a href="mailto:jefsey@jefsey.com">jefsey@jefsey.com</a>&gt;<br>

<dl>
<dd>I will try to update these drafts this month:<br>

<dd>-
<a href="http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-iucg-internet-plus-10.txt">
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-iucg-internet-plus-10.txt</a><br>

<dd>-
<a href="http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-iucg-iutf-tasks-01.txt" eudora="autourl">
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-iucg-iutf-tasks-01.txt</a><br><br>

<dd>Then, I would plan to start working on a prototype interbox
developped in Erlang and using CouchDB as an integrated NoSQL database
slot. Next slots could be a DNS protocol, ML-DNS basic functionnalities
(IDNApp) and a NIC management support.<br><br>

<dd>1. comments on the Drafts are welcome.<br>

<dd>2. interest in working on the interbox architecture/development or
comments are welcome.<br><br>

<dd>Until mid-July I will keep this internal to IUCG.<br>

<dd>jfc<br><br>

<dd>_______________________________________________<br>

<dd>iucg mailing list<br>

<dd><a href="mailto:iucg@ietf.org">iucg@ietf.org</a><br>

<dd><a href="https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iucg" eudora="autourl">
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iucg</a><br><br>

</dl><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
iucg mailing list<br>
iucg@ietf.org<br>
<a href="https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iucg" eudora="autourl">
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iucg</a></blockquote></body>
</html>

--=====================_176777946==.ALT--


From mfberny@gmail.com  Sun Jul  8 16:05:55 2012
Return-Path: <mfberny@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: iucg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iucg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F59821F8735 for <iucg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun,  8 Jul 2012 16:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p-HKptfJ0Nb4 for <iucg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun,  8 Jul 2012 16:05:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gh0-f172.google.com (mail-gh0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8591F21F86F9 for <iucg@ietf.org>; Sun,  8 Jul 2012 16:05:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ghbg16 with SMTP id g16so10546450ghb.31 for <iucg@ietf.org>; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 16:06:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=tpi/leYwbX2j/fG0vo27uf2jDfN17onNsPf7RyUrGJk=; b=EaKrn74ar5UyDmX0L1YSZQo6WMLjdwfdDPIewlnPVgwpECtLath3iLz9IhVau0C1qS s3qZq7peWYJvzZqzKPHrTzPyfPLVDokJTcybppzGO9evdR/cac+qAnEHDbz1QOp6sEc5 kZFkxBVxgp1E+vGVZjadv6IjXyx/GLlwEKQvpJvKQpcFtwS8IHWndFHN3nIheA/LmgxD q+MjnpTO1tSUOMQYP3X0Th0z9yZEsbszj6FTluasCd7TFrFPpjjFki6QDPkPmof4JHGr dRIA+fLZbN//1+lvDFPK5R82Sv8JKQQw5AKfOKwvoXi3NOnDBCkBC2g8Ip6UV6W9LzlU IcIw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.185.198 with SMTP id u46mr45099301yhm.33.1341788777298; Sun, 08 Jul 2012 16:06:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.236.29.234 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Jul 2012 16:06:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120708220450.7CEEB21F873E@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20120708200409.608F221F869D@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAA=tpDBwj-z9BOfU1GC1UuHUZUuxPy6dZS8mXwuAqkR5pXtdSw@mail.gmail.com> <20120708220450.7CEEB21F873E@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 01:06:17 +0200
Message-ID: <CAL-6tfVuzwm=osYn9WrHP0mh+h-7NBLaJTWHCNSDBo6pNU1A_Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Marie-France Berny <mfberny@gmail.com>
To: internet users contributing group <iucg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3056409f6f3a0404c4598bf2
Subject: Re: [iucg] Internet+ and IUTF drafts
X-BeenThere: iucg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: internet users contributing group <iucg@ietf.org>
List-Id: internet users contributing group <iucg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iucg>, <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/iucg>
List-Post: <mailto:iucg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iucg>, <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2012 23:05:55 -0000

--20cf3056409f6f3a0404c4598bf2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

2012/7/9 JFC Morfin <jefsey@jefsey.com>

>  - UNINUM, a universal numbering plan integrating IPv6 as well.
>

I had a look to http://uninum.org: you did not change anything. Is Uninum a
matter you plan to discuss anytime soon?
Marie-France Berny

--20cf3056409f6f3a0404c4598bf2
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2012/7/9 JFC Morfin <span dir=3D"ltr">&l=
t;<a href=3D"mailto:jefsey@jefsey.com" target=3D"_blank">jefsey@jefsey.com<=
/a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .=
8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

<div>
- UNINUM, a universal numbering plan integrating IPv6 as well.<br></div></b=
lockquote></div><br>I had a look to <a href=3D"http://uninum.org">http://un=
inum.org</a>: you did not change anything. Is Uninum a matter you plan to d=
iscuss anytime soon? <br>
Marie-France Berny<br>

--20cf3056409f6f3a0404c4598bf2--

From jefsey@jefsey.com  Mon Jul  9 01:04:25 2012
Return-Path: <jefsey@jefsey.com>
X-Original-To: iucg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iucg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1725A21F8675 for <iucg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon,  9 Jul 2012 01:04:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.498
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.500, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_75=0.6, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9V0aL--B64Hy for <iucg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon,  9 Jul 2012 01:04:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from m169.montage2.altserver.com (m169.montage2.altserver.com [72.34.52.169]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C36DA21F865D for <iucg@ietf.org>; Mon,  9 Jul 2012 01:04:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from i03v-62-35-238-138.d4.club-internet.fr ([62.35.238.138]:61212 helo=MORFIN-PC.jefsey.com) by montage2.altserver.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from <jefsey@jefsey.com>) id 1So8xa-0004Np-QN; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 01:04:47 -0700
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 10:04:45 +0200
To: internet users contributing group <iucg@ietf.org>, internet users contributing group <iucg@ietf.org>
From: JFC Morfin <jefsey@jefsey.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL-6tfVuzwm=osYn9WrHP0mh+h-7NBLaJTWHCNSDBo6pNU1A_Q@mail.g mail.com>
References: <20120708200409.608F221F869D@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAA=tpDBwj-z9BOfU1GC1UuHUZUuxPy6dZS8mXwuAqkR5pXtdSw@mail.gmail.com> <20120708220450.7CEEB21F873E@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAL-6tfVuzwm=osYn9WrHP0mh+h-7NBLaJTWHCNSDBo6pNU1A_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====================_35360341==.ALT"
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - montage2.altserver.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jefsey.com
X-Source: 
X-Source-Args: 
X-Source-Dir: 
Message-Id: <20120709080423.C36DA21F865D@ietfa.amsl.com>
Subject: Re: [iucg] Internet+ and IUTF drafts
X-BeenThere: iucg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: internet users contributing group <iucg@ietf.org>
List-Id: internet users contributing group <iucg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iucg>, <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/iucg>
List-Post: <mailto:iucg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iucg>, <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 08:04:25 -0000

--=====================_35360341==.ALT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

At 01:06 09/07/2012, Marie-France Berny wrote:
>2012/7/9 JFC Morfin <<mailto:jefsey@jefsey.com>jefsey@jefsey.com>
>- UNINUM, a universal numbering plan integrating IPv6 as well.
>
>
>I had a look to <http://uninum.org>http://uninum.org: you did not 
>change anything. Is Uninum a matter you plan to discuss anytime soon?
>Marie-France Berny

This is something I plan to discuss as part of the Internet+ Draft. 
However it could also be attached to the SDNS I_D about semantic 
digital names syntax I started working on mostly in French 
(http://iucg.org/wiki/SDNS_-_Semantic_Digital_Naming_Syntax) before 
it should be extended in a dedicated document and MDRS database.

The concept I would eventually propose is the one of an universal 
numbering plan number serving as a common root in decimal, hexa and 
alphadecimal numbering areas. The root would be 3 to 17 figures long. 
An Uninum would then be formed by the NPN + the values of the 
concerned plan, whatever the length of their string. An IPv6 address 
would therefore be 35 hexa long., but could also be compacted as a 
base 36 or 34 (without I and O) alphadecimal number.

However, I would suggest that we keep this concept unprecise in the 
architectural framework in order to be flexible during the 
prototyping/intertesting period and finalize on experience. In 
particular I would like to preserve the possibility to use 
numeric.names to optimise things like CCN (content centric networking).

Comments welcome.
jfc


PS. I am in a Leibniz period while we just discovered the higgs. I 
feel we need to be prepared to fully support monadic networking 
concepts + Complex Time in an _open_ way, not to be passed by the 
future needs, as it was the case with IPv4. So, we are better to be 
able to give a scalar address to every higgs, Planck vanished 
particule, and Platon's idea :-) if possible without wasting too much 
bandwidth!



--=====================_35360341==.ALT
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"

<html>
<body>
At 01:06 09/07/2012, Marie-France Berny wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">2012/7/9 JFC Morfin
&lt;<a href="mailto:jefsey@jefsey.com">jefsey@jefsey.com</a>&gt;
<dl>
<dd>- UNINUM, a universal numbering plan integrating IPv6 as
well.<br><br>
</dl><br>
I had a look to <a href="http://uninum.org">http://uninum.org</a>: you
did not change anything. Is Uninum a matter you plan to discuss anytime
soon? <br>
Marie-France Berny</blockquote><br>
This is something I plan to discuss as part of the Internet+ Draft.
However it could also be attached to the SDNS I_D about semantic digital
names syntax I started working on mostly in French
(<a href="http://iucg.org/wiki/SDNS_-_Semantic_Digital_Naming_Syntax" eudora="autourl">
http://iucg.org/wiki/SDNS_-_Semantic_Digital_Naming_Syntax</a>) before it
should be extended in a dedicated document and MDRS database.<br><br>
The concept I would eventually propose is the one of an universal
numbering plan number serving as a common root in decimal, hexa and
alphadecimal numbering areas. The root would be 3 to 17 figures long. An
Uninum would then be formed by the NPN + the values of the concerned
plan, whatever the length of their string. An IPv6 address would
therefore be 35 hexa long., but could also be compacted as a base 36 or
34 (without I and O) alphadecimal number.<br><br>
However, I would suggest that we keep this concept unprecise in the
architectural framework in order to be flexible during the
prototyping/intertesting period and finalize on experience. In particular
I would like to preserve the possibility to use numeric.names to optimise
things like CCN (content centric networking). <br><br>
Comments welcome.<br>
jfc<br><br>
<br>
PS. I am in a Leibniz period while we just discovered the higgs. I feel
we need to be prepared to fully support monadic networking concepts +
Complex Time in an _open_ way, not to be passed by the future needs, as
it was the case with IPv4. So, we are better to be able to give a scalar
address to every higgs, Planck vanished particule, and Platon's idea :-)
if possible without wasting too much bandwidth!<br><br>
<br>
</body>
</html>

--=====================_35360341==.ALT--


From jmabdp@gmail.com  Mon Jul  9 03:04:43 2012
Return-Path: <jmabdp@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: iucg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iucg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8921221F8637 for <iucg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon,  9 Jul 2012 03:04:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.998
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_75=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EnunKejLHgjY for <iucg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon,  9 Jul 2012 03:04:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bk0-f44.google.com (mail-bk0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C238A21F853B for <iucg@ietf.org>; Mon,  9 Jul 2012 03:04:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bkty7 with SMTP id y7so2544285bkt.31 for <iucg@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 03:05:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=x7Ap2mGMPn+XzC9/aZhQ3Egi1zJ758d7DUXekvcthGE=; b=PzQlT7/9J5sj0KePkmlw+uKuZ6fIjfREV9gV8FJ5f9Epb+MPcuEXOcM5Xqlkd76uwv U7vzSoJqbuqv+rt1V1Cisi5fLOesHmd+j1l3UgvtMdLe91yJMkCndhFUpimqJFoCr1mq QeMy4wel58Cm2wgQ0vIc97znKx8GS1vSswY09xOVT4vbdK/f6fcqYUdinmka466RjE6x 9tOGuJ7X47HPiUUD9wZZKyLcjCDszLFVDWTv20OW/DcZYaKFSlQ18AyIZmRh7EppNlfQ VO8UFxC13mSutQt7O3JngO+DgCAP05wy1huRbX5M8iLSzpRCF6VRgrn9zq0HQVU14bK/ 4eLg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.152.220 with SMTP id h28mr8908054bkw.30.1341828306556; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 03:05:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.205.115.72 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 03:05:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120709080423.C36DA21F865D@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20120708200409.608F221F869D@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAA=tpDBwj-z9BOfU1GC1UuHUZUuxPy6dZS8mXwuAqkR5pXtdSw@mail.gmail.com> <20120708220450.7CEEB21F873E@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAL-6tfVuzwm=osYn9WrHP0mh+h-7NBLaJTWHCNSDBo6pNU1A_Q@mail.gmail.com> <20120709080423.C36DA21F865D@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 12:05:06 +0200
Message-ID: <CAGzJzZ4pLuSRfP75Si2pf_U8UseGPWp3=4uL-b22xBA3whTysw@mail.gmail.com>
From: jean-michel bernier de portzamparc <jmabdp@gmail.com>
To: internet users contributing group <iucg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cd17e8fd81004c462bf43
Subject: Re: [iucg] Internet+ and IUTF drafts
X-BeenThere: iucg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: internet users contributing group <iucg@ietf.org>
List-Id: internet users contributing group <iucg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iucg>, <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/iucg>
List-Post: <mailto:iucg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iucg>, <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 10:04:43 -0000

--0015175cd17e8fd81004c462bf43
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

2012/7/9 JFC Morfin <jefsey@jefsey.com>

>  However, I would suggest that we keep this concept unprecise in the
> architectural framework in order to be flexible during the
> prototyping/intertesting period and finalize on experience. In particular I
> would like to preserve the possibility to use numeric.names to optimise
> things like CCN (content centric networking).
>

If I am correct, you would like to give a final reference or semantic
address to every document or even every object, thought and concept across
the time. Don't you fear to reproduce the Unicode cacophony? Who will tell
you that two objects are the same or not? This will open the door to
intellectual phishing (a part from the practical impossibility due to the
size of the tables ...)!
Portzamparc

--0015175cd17e8fd81004c462bf43
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2012/7/9 JFC Morfin <span dir=3D"ltr">&l=
t;<a href=3D"mailto:jefsey@jefsey.com" target=3D"_blank">jefsey@jefsey.com<=
/a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .=
8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

<div>
However, I would suggest that we keep this concept unprecise in the
architectural framework in order to be flexible during the
prototyping/intertesting period and finalize on experience. In particular
I would like to preserve the possibility to use numeric.names to optimise
things like CCN (content centric networking). <br></div></blockquote><div><=
br>If I am correct, you would like to give a final reference or semantic ad=
dress to every document or even every object, thought and concept across th=
e time. Don&#39;t you fear to reproduce the Unicode cacophony? Who will tel=
l you that two objects are the same or not? This will open the door to inte=
llectual phishing (a part from the practical impossibility due to the size =
of the tables ...)! <br>
Portzamparc<br></div></div>

--0015175cd17e8fd81004c462bf43--

From mfberny@gmail.com  Mon Jul  9 03:19:45 2012
Return-Path: <mfberny@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: iucg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iucg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 964D021F869C for <iucg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon,  9 Jul 2012 03:19:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.298
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.298 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_75=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2W49akDFBQjt for <iucg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon,  9 Jul 2012 03:19:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gh0-f172.google.com (mail-gh0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B7E221F8555 for <iucg@ietf.org>; Mon,  9 Jul 2012 03:19:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ghbg16 with SMTP id g16so10873340ghb.31 for <iucg@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 03:20:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=sVtEqmNmVFOiYF4IPLu5ZdaSfW6mjdVBv6tV8zZVfNE=; b=bSPCynd3veUusJyb8HrF0+ylHQdOPJXj/OSSDJY4G4N9zRdbKeBRYIIiEirt/CwEz9 FBVx4MdnOPbMZUB2kuHGepNkxvH6u8KLxEW+E8P88fq0EqFsSxzdS8QE/4gc/Oidh7YX 4DNC0YlOZ0Tz6cMOR+ykfmRvG10wpZ9fKgNuCSzLGJrvyq5BbxL3rmBoWLUd7rfN8BtE svwUryc70espVoF9Ll4TTUOUt9D9f44R9NB53dnOZH9jE5EvhOC4MiuTBvYZu8Pl7gxm OJfC99SkEu6RkdJX8D/8E6XDa7jeCodNtGSAiXJxfrX9cxPUrhG/g5+oODfO7jIKwzr1 OlIA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.190.6 with SMTP id d6mr45346821yhn.16.1341829205937; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 03:20:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.236.29.234 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 03:20:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAGzJzZ4pLuSRfP75Si2pf_U8UseGPWp3=4uL-b22xBA3whTysw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20120708200409.608F221F869D@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAA=tpDBwj-z9BOfU1GC1UuHUZUuxPy6dZS8mXwuAqkR5pXtdSw@mail.gmail.com> <20120708220450.7CEEB21F873E@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAL-6tfVuzwm=osYn9WrHP0mh+h-7NBLaJTWHCNSDBo6pNU1A_Q@mail.gmail.com> <20120709080423.C36DA21F865D@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAGzJzZ4pLuSRfP75Si2pf_U8UseGPWp3=4uL-b22xBA3whTysw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 12:20:05 +0200
Message-ID: <CAL-6tfWdzuFGY0o2MU3R5S7P+yik0FDby9-FSFP2n=NA724jzA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Marie-France Berny <mfberny@gmail.com>
To: internet users contributing group <iucg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf302075062b4f3404c462f51e
Subject: Re: [iucg] Internet+ and IUTF drafts
X-BeenThere: iucg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: internet users contributing group <iucg@ietf.org>
List-Id: internet users contributing group <iucg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iucg>, <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/iucg>
List-Post: <mailto:iucg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iucg>, <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 10:19:45 -0000

--20cf302075062b4f3404c462f51e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I am not sure the size is so large. People use to survive with 800 to 2000
words. It would be interesting to know how many concepts we actually use
(look at the Chinese characters). Another interesting work is Pierre Levy's
IEML (http://www.ieml.org).
Marie-France Berny

2012/7/9 jean-michel bernier de portzamparc <jmabdp@gmail.com>

>
>
> 2012/7/9 JFC Morfin <jefsey@jefsey.com>
>
>>  However, I would suggest that we keep this concept unprecise in the
>> architectural framework in order to be flexible during the
>> prototyping/intertesting period and finalize on experience. In particular I
>> would like to preserve the possibility to use numeric.names to optimise
>> things like CCN (content centric networking).
>>
>
> If I am correct, you would like to give a final reference or semantic
> address to every document or even every object, thought and concept across
> the time. Don't you fear to reproduce the Unicode cacophony? Who will tell
> you that two objects are the same or not? This will open the door to
> intellectual phishing (a part from the practical impossibility due to the
> size of the tables ...)!
> Portzamparc
>
> _______________________________________________
> iucg mailing list
> iucg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iucg
>
>

--20cf302075062b4f3404c462f51e
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I am not sure the size is so large. People use to survive with 800 to 2000 =
words. It would be interesting to know how many concepts we actually use (l=
ook at the Chinese characters). Another interesting work is Pierre Levy&#39=
;s IEML (<a href=3D"http://www.ieml.org">http://www.ieml.org</a>).<br>
Marie-France Berny<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2012/7/9 jean-michel b=
ernier de portzamparc <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:jmabdp@gmail.=
com" target=3D"_blank">jmabdp@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote class=
=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padd=
ing-left:1ex">
<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div class=3D"im">2012/7/9 JFC Morfin <s=
pan dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:jefsey@jefsey.com" target=3D"_blank">=
jefsey@jefsey.com</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=
=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">


<div>
However, I would suggest that we keep this concept unprecise in the
architectural framework in order to be flexible during the
prototyping/intertesting period and finalize on experience. In particular
I would like to preserve the possibility to use numeric.names to optimise
things like CCN (content centric networking). <br></div></blockquote></div>=
<div><br>If I am correct, you would like to give a final reference or seman=
tic address to every document or even every object, thought and concept acr=
oss the time. Don&#39;t you fear to reproduce the Unicode cacophony? Who wi=
ll tell you that two objects are the same or not? This will open the door t=
o intellectual phishing (a part from the practical impossibility due to the=
 size of the tables ...)! <br>
<span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888">
Portzamparc<br></font></span></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
iucg mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:iucg@ietf.org">iucg@ietf.org</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iucg" target=3D"_blank">ht=
tps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iucg</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>

--20cf302075062b4f3404c462f51e--

From jefsey@jefsey.com  Mon Jul  9 03:48:53 2012
Return-Path: <jefsey@jefsey.com>
X-Original-To: iucg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iucg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0AB821F84FA for <iucg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon,  9 Jul 2012 03:48:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.815
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.815 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.516, BAYES_00=-2.599, MANGLED_RX=2.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WRvuGySDKqhh for <iucg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon,  9 Jul 2012 03:48:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from m169.montage2.altserver.com (m169.montage2.altserver.com [72.34.52.169]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0D7321F85EA for <iucg@ietf.org>; Mon,  9 Jul 2012 03:48:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from i03v-62-35-238-138.d4.club-internet.fr ([62.35.238.138]:49452 helo=MORFIN-PC.jefsey.com) by montage2.altserver.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from <jefsey@jefsey.com>) id 1SoBWl-00036s-LO for iucg@ietf.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 03:49:16 -0700
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 12:48:27 +0200
To: "iucg@ietf.org" <iucg@ietf.org>
From: jefsey <jefsey@jefsey.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - montage2.altserver.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jefsey.com
X-Source: 
X-Source-Args: 
X-Source-Dir: 
Message-Id: <20120709104852.A0D7321F85EA@ietfa.amsl.com>
Subject: [iucg] ECAI 2012
X-BeenThere: iucg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: internet users contributing group <iucg@ietf.org>
List-Id: internet users contributing group <iucg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iucg>, <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/iucg>
List-Post: <mailto:iucg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iucg>, <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 10:48:54 -0000

http://www2.lirmm.fr/ecai2012/

Preinscriptions close tomorrow (lower rate).
I will attend and can host someone during the duration of the meeting.
My focus will be to explore interest and discuss interboxes as 
autonomous agents in a multiagent network context.
jfc


From jefsey@jefsey.com  Mon Jul  9 07:51:28 2012
Return-Path: <jefsey@jefsey.com>
X-Original-To: iucg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: iucg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED5621F861B for <iucg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon,  9 Jul 2012 07:51:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.536
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.536 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.462, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_75=0.6, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id THnehn-4+chD for <iucg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon,  9 Jul 2012 07:51:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from m169.montage2.altserver.com (m169.montage2.altserver.com [72.34.52.169]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0AE821F84B3 for <iucg@ietf.org>; Mon,  9 Jul 2012 07:51:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from i03v-62-35-238-138.d4.club-internet.fr ([62.35.238.138]:51133 helo=MORFIN-PC.jefsey.com) by montage2.altserver.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from <jefsey@jefsey.com>) id 1SoFJY-0001ws-D2 for iucg@ietf.org; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 07:51:52 -0700
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 16:49:27 +0200
To: internet users contributing group <iucg@ietf.org>
From: JFC Morfin <jefsey@jefsey.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGzJzZ4pLuSRfP75Si2pf_U8UseGPWp3=4uL-b22xBA3whTysw@mail.g mail.com>
References: <20120708200409.608F221F869D@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAA=tpDBwj-z9BOfU1GC1UuHUZUuxPy6dZS8mXwuAqkR5pXtdSw@mail.gmail.com> <20120708220450.7CEEB21F873E@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAL-6tfVuzwm=osYn9WrHP0mh+h-7NBLaJTWHCNSDBo6pNU1A_Q@mail.gmail.com> <20120709080423.C36DA21F865D@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAGzJzZ4pLuSRfP75Si2pf_U8UseGPWp3=4uL-b22xBA3whTysw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====================_59784699==.ALT"
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - montage2.altserver.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jefsey.com
X-Source: 
X-Source-Args: 
X-Source-Dir: 
Message-Id: <20120709145127.B0AE821F84B3@ietfa.amsl.com>
Subject: Re: [iucg] Internet+ and IUTF drafts
X-BeenThere: iucg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: internet users contributing group <iucg@ietf.org>
List-Id: internet users contributing group <iucg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/iucg>, <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/iucg>
List-Post: <mailto:iucg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iucg>, <mailto:iucg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 14:51:28 -0000

--=====================_59784699==.ALT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

On 12:05 09/07/2012, jean-michel bernier de portzamparc said:
>2012/7/9 JFC Morfin <<mailto:jefsey@jefsey.com>jefsey@jefsey.com>
>However, I would suggest that we keep this concept unprecise in the 
>architectural framework in order to be flexible during the 
>prototyping/intertesting period and finalize on experience. In 
>particular I would like to preserve the possibility to use 
>numeric.names to optimise things like CCN (content centric networking).
>
>If I am correct, you would like to give a final reference or 
>semantic address to every document or even every object, thought and 
>concept across the time. Don't you fear to reproduce the Unicode 
>cacophony? Who will tell you that two objects are the same or not? 
>This will open the door to intellectual phishing (a part from the 
>practical impossibility due to the size of the tables ...)!

Good point. However:

1) I do not want to "give a final reference", I need a unique 
numbering plan for all the numbers given by others.
2) this numbering plan will include ISO 10646. So, the problem raised 
by Unicode will be there.

The response lies in my principle of finite binary indiscernibles 
which refines Leibniz's one ( :-) ). If two binary finite objects are 
indiscernible they are the same object. For example, Unicode's 
cacophony, as you call it, result from using assigned code you cannot 
compare rather than the digital representation of its signs. If you 
establish a raster 32x32 (or 16x32) table of the character signs you 
can differentiate them or not, and build a universal table of sign 
graphics (Unigraph). The same for concepts you can build a polynym 
taxonomy. For ideas you can reduce them to logical statements. For 
people you have SSN or Author Numbers, for texts you have ISSN, 
etc.  I do not claim it is easy, but I think it is workable.

Numbers are quite compact, more over if they are Hexa or 
alphadecimal, and if you use only their end, when they have a common header.
jfc

--=====================_59784699==.ALT
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"

<html>
<body>
On 12:05 09/07/2012, jean-michel bernier de portzamparc said:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">2012/7/9 JFC Morfin
&lt;<a href="mailto:jefsey@jefsey.com">jefsey@jefsey.com</a>&gt;<br>

<dl>
<dd>However, I would suggest that we keep this concept unprecise in the
architectural framework in order to be flexible during the
prototyping/intertesting period and finalize on experience. In particular
I would like to preserve the possibility to use numeric.names to optimise
things like CCN (content centric networking). <br><br>

</dl>If I am correct, you would like to give a final reference or
semantic address to every document or even every object, thought and
concept across the time. Don't you fear to reproduce the Unicode
cacophony? Who will tell you that two objects are the same or not? This
will open the door to intellectual phishing (a part from the practical
impossibility due to the size of the tables ...)! </blockquote><br>
Good point. However:<br><br>
1) I do not want to &quot;give a final reference&quot;, I need a unique
numbering plan for all the numbers given by others.<br>
2) this numbering plan will include ISO 10646. So, the problem raised by
Unicode will be there.<br><br>
The response lies in my principle of finite binary indiscernibles which
refines Leibniz's one ( :-) ). If two binary finite objects are
indiscernible they are the same object. For example, Unicode's cacophony,
as you call it, result from using assigned code you cannot compare rather
than the digital representation of its signs. If you establish a raster
32x32 (or 16x32) table of the character signs you can differentiate them
or not, and build a universal table of sign graphics (Unigraph). The same
for concepts you can build a polynym taxonomy. For ideas you can reduce
them to logical statements. For people you have SSN or Author Numbers,
for texts you have ISSN, etc.&nbsp; I do not claim it is easy, but I
think it is workable.<br><br>
Numbers are quite compact, more over if they are Hexa or alphadecimal,
and if you use only their end, when they have a common header.<br>
jfc<br>
</body>
</html>

--=====================_59784699==.ALT--

