From N.Leymann@telekom.de Fri Jan 6 02:10:50 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4560521F88B8 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 02:10:50 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.948 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.948 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JttnHOqK1WPR for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 02:10:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from tcmail73.telekom.de (tcmail73.telekom.de [217.243.239.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40F8D21F88B6 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 02:10:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from he101250.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.125.92.153]) by tcmail71.telekom.de with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 06 Jan 2012 11:09:56 +0100 Received: from HE111543.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([169.254.4.242]) by HE101250.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([fe80::e439:4046:12e2:e37%15]) with mapi; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 11:09:55 +0100 From: To: , Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 11:09:54 +0100 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?Q?AW:_[l2vpn]_WG_Poll_for_adopting_the_draft_=B3A_Framework_?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?for_E-Tree_Service_over_MPLS_Network=B2_as_a_WG_document?= Thread-Topic: =?iso-8859-1?Q?[l2vpn]_WG_Poll_for_adopting_the_draft_=B3A_Framework_for_?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?E-Tree_Service_over_MPLS_Network=B2_as_a_WG_document?= Thread-Index: Acy7/US3MCOFeoXnR9q2KWn+2fX2gwQXgfGw Message-ID: <9762ACF04FA26B4388476841256BDE020115AA203B93@HE111543.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: de-DE Content-Language: de-DE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: de-DE Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9762ACF04FA26B4388476841256BDE020115AA203B93HE111543eme_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: giheron@cisco.com X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 10:10:50 -0000 --_000_9762ACF04FA26B4388476841256BDE020115AA203B93HE111543eme_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Support. regards Nic ________________________________ Von: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von = Bitar, Nabil N Gesendet: Freitag, 16. Dezember 2011 15:16 An: l2vpn@ietf.org Cc: Giles Heron Betreff: [l2vpn] WG Poll for adopting the draft =B3A Framework for E-Tree S= ervice over MPLS Network=B2 as a WG document Hi, This is the start of a three-week working group poll for adopting the draft= "A Framework for E-Tree Service over MPLS Network" as an L2VPN WG document= . The draft can be found at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-key-l2vpn-etree-= frwk-06 . Please, review the draft and send any comments to the L2VPN working group e= mail list. This WG poll will close on Friday January 6, 2012. Regards, Nabil --_000_9762ACF04FA26B4388476841256BDE020115AA203B93HE111543eme_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Support.
 
 =20 regards
 
   &nbs= p;=20 Nic

Von: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org=20 [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von Bitar, Nabil=20 N
Gesendet: Freitag, 16. Dezember 2011 15:16
An:=20 l2vpn@ietf.org
Cc: Giles Heron
Betreff: [l2vpn] WG Poll= for=20 adopting the draft =B3A Framework for E-Tree Service over MPLS Network=B2 a= s a WG=20 document

Hi,

This is the start of a three-week working group po= ll for=20 adopting the draft =93A Framework for E-Tree Service over MPLS=20 Network=94 as an= L2VPN WG=20 document. 

The draft can be found at http://to= ols.ietf.org/html/draft-key-l2vpn-etree-frwk-06 .
 
Please, review the draft and send any comments to = the=20 L2VPN working group email list. 

This WG poll will close on Friday January 6,=20 2012.
 
Regards,
Nabil 
--_000_9762ACF04FA26B4388476841256BDE020115AA203B93HE111543eme_-- From trafique@above.net Fri Jan 6 13:36:19 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 698101F0C3F for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 13:36:19 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.298 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.298 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eWT+85odu8Rd for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 13:36:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from DFWCAS.Above.Net (DFWCAS.above.net [64.125.228.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A1341F0C36 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 13:36:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from DFWXMB02.na.above.net ([fe80::a454:c5fa:17df:4e68]) by DFWXHC01.na.above.net ([::1]) with mapi id 14.01.0289.001; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 15:34:50 -0600 From: "Rafique, Tariq" To: "Bitar, Nabil N" , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: =?iso-8859-1?Q?RE:_[l2vpn]_WG_Poll_for_adopting_the_draft_=B3A_Framework_?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?for_E-Tree_Service_over_MPLS_Network=B2_as_a_WG_document?= Thread-Topic: =?iso-8859-1?Q?[l2vpn]_WG_Poll_for_adopting_the_draft_=B3A_Framework_for_?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?E-Tree_Service_over_MPLS_Network=B2_as_a_WG_document?= Thread-Index: Acy7/US3MCOFeoXnR9q2KWn+2fX2gwQvWbLw Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 21:34:49 +0000 Message-ID: <012FD0169CC9E049A20B6E6AF1E1FE580C899BC3@DFWXMB02.na.above.net> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [71.163.244.85] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_012FD0169CC9E049A20B6E6AF1E1FE580C899BC3DFWXMB02naabove_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Giles Heron X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 21:36:19 -0000 --_000_012FD0169CC9E049A20B6E6AF1E1FE580C899BC3DFWXMB02naabove_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Support. Thanks, Tariq From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of B= itar, Nabil N Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 9:16 AM To: l2vpn@ietf.org Cc: Giles Heron Subject: [l2vpn] WG Poll for adopting the draft =B3A Framework for E-Tree S= ervice over MPLS Network=B2 as a WG document Hi, This is the start of a three-week working group poll for adopting the draft= "A Framework for E-Tree Service over MPLS Network" as an L2VPN WG document= . The draft can be found at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-key-l2vpn-etree-= frwk-06 . Please, review the draft and send any comments to the L2VPN working group e= mail list. This WG poll will close on Friday January 6, 2012. Regards, Nabil --_000_012FD0169CC9E049A20B6E6AF1E1FE580C899BC3DFWXMB02naabove_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Support.

 <= /p>

Thanks,=


Tariq

 <= /p>

From: l2vpn-bo= unces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bitar, Nabil N
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 9:16 AM
To: l2vpn@ietf.org
Cc: Giles Heron
Subject: [l2vpn] WG Poll for adopting the draft =B3A Framework for E= -Tree Service over MPLS Network=B2 as a WG document

 

Hi,

 

This is the start of a three-week working group poll for adopting = the draft “A Framework for E-Tree Service over MPLS Network” as= an L2VPN WG document. 

 

The draft can be found at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-key-l2vp= n-etree-frwk-06 .
 
Please, review the draft and send any comm= ents to the L2VPN working group email list. 

This WG poll will close on Friday January = 6, 2012.
 
Regards,
Nabil 

--_000_012FD0169CC9E049A20B6E6AF1E1FE580C899BC3DFWXMB02naabove_-- From william.zayas@fibercrossing.net Fri Jan 6 13:38:29 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7FF1F0C65 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 13:38:29 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.388 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=2.067] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id div1kCkAO6Jz for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 13:38:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from omr9.networksolutionsemail.com (omr9.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.59]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A18F51F0C36 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 13:38:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from cm-omr9 (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50]) by omr9.networksolutionsemail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q06LcRbY002095 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 16:38:27 -0500 X-Authenticated-IP: 205.178.146.50 Received: from [205.178.146.50] ([205.178.146.50:58044] helo=webmail59) by cm-omr9 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.41 r(31179/31189)) with ESMTP id F4/3F-12338-3D9670F4; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 16:38:27 -0500 Received: from 77.67.108.13 (william.zayas@fibercrossing.net [77.67.108.13]) by webmail59 (Netsol 11.2.30) with WEBMAIL id 24286; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 21:38:27 +0000 From: william.zayas@fibercrossing.net To: "Rafique, Tariq" , "Bitar, Nabil N" , l2vpn@ietf.org Importance: Normal Sensitivity: Normal Message-ID: X-Mailer: Network Solutions Webmail, Build 11.2.30 X-Originating-IP: [77.67.108.13] X-Forwarded-For: [(null)] Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 21:38:27 +0000 Subject: Re: [l2vpn] WG Poll for adopting the draft =?iso-8859-1?Q?=B3A?= Framework for E-Tree Service over MPLS =?iso-8859-1?Q?Network=B2?= as a WG document MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--=_vm_0011_W8586715158_24286_1325885907" Cc: Giles Heron X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 21:38:29 -0000 ----=_vm_0011_W8586715158_24286_1325885907 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Support, Cheers, wz 3D"IPv6 -----Original Message----- From: Rafique, Tariq [mailto:trafique@above.net] Sent: Friday, January 6, 2012 04:34 PM To: 'Bitar, Nabil N', l2vpn@ietf.org Cc: 'Giles Heron' Subject: RE: [l2vpn] WG Poll for adopting the draft =B3A Framework for E-= Tree Service over MPLS Network=B2 as a WG document Support. Thanks, Tariq From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of= Bitar, Nabil N Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 9:16 AM To: l2vpn@ietf.org Cc: Giles Heron Subject: [l2vpn] WG Poll for adopting the draft =B3A Framework for E-Tree= Service over MPLS Network=B2 as a WG document Hi, This is the start of a three-week working group poll for adopting the dra= ft ?A Framework for E-Tree Service over MPLS Network? as an L2VPN WG docu= ment. The draft can be found at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-key-l2vpn-etre= e-frwk-06 . Please, review the draft and send any comments to the L2VPN working group= email list. This WG poll will close on Friday January 6, 2012. Regards, Nabil ----=_vm_0011_W8586715158_24286_1325885907 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
Support,
 
 
 
Cheers,
 
 
wz
 
 
 
 
 
<a href=3D"http://ipv6.he.net/c= ertification/scoresheet.php?pass_name=3DWilliamZayas " target=3D"_blank"&= gt;<img src=3D"http://ipv6.he.net/certification/create_badge.php?pass_= name=3DWilliamZayas &badge=3D1" width=3D128 height=3D128 border=3D0 a= lt=3D"IPv6 Certification Badge for WilliamZayas "></img></a&g= t;
 
-----Ori= ginal Message-----
From: Rafique, Tariq [mailto:trafique@above.= net]
Sent: Friday, January 6, 2012 04:34 PM
To: 'Bita= r, Nabil N', l2vpn@ietf.org
Cc: 'Giles Heron'
Subject: RE: [l2vpn] WG Poll for adopting the draft =B3A Framework for E-Tree Se= rvice over MPLS Network=B2 as a WG document
----=_vm_0011_W8586715158_24286_1325885907-- From Manuel.Paul@telekom.de Fri Jan 6 14:36:33 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A4E521F8613 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 14:36:33 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.796 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.796 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SARE_SUB_ENC_UTF8=0.152] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Uv9uSYePAA8C for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 14:36:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from tcmail13.telekom.de (tcmail13.telekom.de [80.149.113.165]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F084221F8611 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 14:36:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from he101250.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.125.92.153]) by tcmail11.telekom.de with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 06 Jan 2012 23:36:28 +0100 Received: from HE101452.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([169.254.2.233]) by HE101250.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([fe80::e439:4046:12e2:e37%15]) with mapi; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 23:36:28 +0100 From: To: , Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 23:36:10 +0100 Subject: =?utf-8?B?UkU6IFtsMnZwbl0gV0cgUG9sbCBmb3IgYWRvcHRpbmcgdGhlIGRyYWZ0IMKz?= =?utf-8?B?QSBGcmFtZXdvcmsgZm9yIEUtVHJlZSBTZXJ2aWNlIG92ZXIgTVBMUyBOZXQ=?= =?utf-8?B?d29ya8KyIGFzIGEgV0cgZG9jdW1lbnQ=?= Thread-Topic: =?utf-8?B?W2wydnBuXSBXRyBQb2xsIGZvciBhZG9wdGluZyB0aGUgZHJhZnQgwrNBIEZy?= =?utf-8?B?YW1ld29yayBmb3IgRS1UcmVlIFNlcnZpY2Ugb3ZlciBNUExTIE5ldHdvcms=?= =?utf-8?B?wrIgYXMgYSBXRyBkb2N1bWVudA==?= Thread-Index: Acy7/US3MCOFeoXnR9q2KWn+2fX2gwQxeeLA Message-ID: <9435EDACD941174099E143BCA2BCD615F8E1BFDDA9@HE101452.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: de-DE Content-Language: de-DE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: de-DE Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9435EDACD941174099E143BCA2BCD615F8E1BFDDA9HE101452emea1_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: giheron@cisco.com X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 22:36:33 -0000 --_000_9435EDACD941174099E143BCA2BCD615F8E1BFDDA9HE101452emea1_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 U3VwcG9ydCENCg0KUmVnYXJkcywNCk1hbnVlbA0KDQpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fXw0KRnJvbTogbDJ2cG4tYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZyBbbWFpbHRvOmwydnBuLWJvdW5j ZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmddIE9uIEJlaGFsZiBPZiBCaXRhciwgTmFiaWwgTg0KU2VudDogRnJpZGF5LCBE ZWNlbWJlciAxNiwgMjAxMSAzOjE2IFBNDQpUbzogbDJ2cG5AaWV0Zi5vcmcNCkNjOiBHaWxlcyBI ZXJvbg0KU3ViamVjdDogW2wydnBuXSBXRyBQb2xsIGZvciBhZG9wdGluZyB0aGUgZHJhZnQgwrNB IEZyYW1ld29yayBmb3IgRS1UcmVlIFNlcnZpY2Ugb3ZlciBNUExTIE5ldHdvcmvCsiBhcyBhIFdH IGRvY3VtZW50DQoNCkhpLA0KDQpUaGlzIGlzIHRoZSBzdGFydCBvZiBhIHRocmVlLXdlZWsgd29y a2luZyBncm91cCBwb2xsIGZvciBhZG9wdGluZyB0aGUgZHJhZnQg4oCcQSBGcmFtZXdvcmsgZm9y IEUtVHJlZSBTZXJ2aWNlIG92ZXIgTVBMUyBOZXR3b3Jr4oCdIGFzIGFuIEwyVlBOIFdHIGRvY3Vt ZW50Lg0KDQpUaGUgZHJhZnQgY2FuIGJlIGZvdW5kIGF0IGh0dHA6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9o dG1sL2RyYWZ0LWtleS1sMnZwbi1ldHJlZS1mcndrLTA2IC4NCg0KUGxlYXNlLCByZXZpZXcgdGhl IGRyYWZ0IGFuZCBzZW5kIGFueSBjb21tZW50cyB0byB0aGUgTDJWUE4gd29ya2luZyBncm91cCBl bWFpbCBsaXN0Lg0KDQpUaGlzIFdHIHBvbGwgd2lsbCBjbG9zZSBvbiBGcmlkYXkgSmFudWFyeSA2 LCAyMDEyLg0KDQpSZWdhcmRzLA0KTmFiaWwNCg== --_000_9435EDACD941174099E143BCA2BCD615F8E1BFDDA9HE101452emea1_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PE1FVEEgSFRUUC1FUVVJVj0iQ29udGVudC1UeXBlIiBDT05URU5UPSJ0ZXh0L2h0bWw7IGNoYXJz ZXQ9dXRmLTgiPg0KPGh0bWwgeG1sbnM6dj0idXJuOnNjaGVtYXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTp2bWwi IHhtbG5zOm89InVybjpzY2hlbWFzLW1pY3Jvc29mdC1jb206b2ZmaWNlOm9mZmljZSIgeG1sbnM6 dz0idXJuOnNjaGVtYXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTpvZmZpY2U6d29yZCIgeG1sbnM9Imh0dHA6Ly93 d3cudzMub3JnL1RSL1JFQy1odG1sNDAiPg0KDQo8aGVhZD4NCg0KPG1ldGEgbmFtZT1HZW5lcmF0 b3IgY29udGVudD0iTWljcm9zb2Z0IFdvcmQgMTEgKGZpbHRlcmVkIG1lZGl1bSkiPg0KPCEtLVtp ZiAhbXNvXT4NCjxzdHlsZT4NCnZcOioge2JlaGF2aW9yOnVybCgjZGVmYXVsdCNWTUwpO30NCm9c Oioge2JlaGF2aW9yOnVybCgjZGVmYXVsdCNWTUwpO30NCndcOioge2JlaGF2aW9yOnVybCgjZGVm YXVsdCNWTUwpO30NCi5zaGFwZSB7YmVoYXZpb3I6dXJsKCNkZWZhdWx0I1ZNTCk7fQ0KPC9zdHls ZT4NCjwhW2VuZGlmXS0tPg0KPHN0eWxlPg0KPCEtLQ0KIC8qIEZvbnQgRGVmaW5pdGlvbnMgKi8N CiBAZm9udC1mYWNlDQoJe2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJNUyBNaW5jaG8iOw0KCXBhbm9zZS0xOjIgMiA2 IDkgNCAyIDUgOCAzIDQ7fQ0KQGZvbnQtZmFjZQ0KCXtmb250LWZhbWlseTpUYWhvbWE7DQoJcGFu b3NlLTE6MiAxMSA2IDQgMyA1IDQgNCAyIDQ7fQ0KQGZvbnQtZmFjZQ0KCXtmb250LWZhbWlseTpD YWxpYnJpOw0KCXBhbm9zZS0xOjIgMTUgNSAyIDIgMiA0IDMgMiA0O30NCkBmb250LWZhY2UNCgl7 Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IlxATVMgTWluY2hvIjsNCglwYW5vc2UtMTowIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAwIDAgMCAw O30NCiAvKiBTdHlsZSBEZWZpbml0aW9ucyAqLw0KIHAuTXNvTm9ybWFsLCBsaS5Nc29Ob3JtYWws IGRpdi5Nc29Ob3JtYWwNCgl7bWFyZ2luOjBjbTsNCgltYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tOi4wMDAxcHQ7DQoJ Zm9udC1zaXplOjEyLjBwdDsNCglmb250LWZhbWlseToiVGltZXMgTmV3IFJvbWFuIjt9DQphOmxp bmssIHNwYW4uTXNvSHlwZXJsaW5rDQoJe2NvbG9yOmJsdWU7DQoJdGV4dC1kZWNvcmF0aW9uOnVu ZGVybGluZTt9DQphOnZpc2l0ZWQsIHNwYW4uTXNvSHlwZXJsaW5rRm9sbG93ZWQNCgl7Y29sb3I6 Ymx1ZTsNCgl0ZXh0LWRlY29yYXRpb246dW5kZXJsaW5lO30NCnANCgl7bXNvLW1hcmdpbi10b3At YWx0OmF1dG87DQoJbWFyZ2luLXJpZ2h0OjBjbTsNCgltc28tbWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbS1hbHQ6YXV0 bzsNCgltYXJnaW4tbGVmdDowY207DQoJZm9udC1zaXplOjEyLjBwdDsNCglmb250LWZhbWlseToi VGltZXMgTmV3IFJvbWFuIjt9DQpzcGFuLkUtTWFpbEZvcm1hdHZvcmxhZ2UxOA0KCXttc28tc3R5 bGUtdHlwZTpwZXJzb25hbC1yZXBseTsNCglmb250LWZhbWlseTpBcmlhbDsNCgljb2xvcjp3aW5k b3d0ZXh0Ow0KCWZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0Om5vcm1hbDsNCglmb250LXN0eWxlOm5vcm1hbDsNCgl0ZXh0 LWRlY29yYXRpb246bm9uZSBub25lO30NCkBwYWdlIFNlY3Rpb24xDQoJe3NpemU6NTk1LjNwdCA4 NDEuOXB0Ow0KCW1hcmdpbjo3MC44NXB0IDcwLjg1cHQgMi4wY20gNzAuODVwdDt9DQpkaXYuU2Vj dGlvbjENCgl7cGFnZTpTZWN0aW9uMTt9DQotLT4NCjwvc3R5bGU+DQoNCjwvaGVhZD4NCg0KPGJv ZHkgbGFuZz1ERSBsaW5rPWJsdWUgdmxpbms9Ymx1ZSBzdHlsZT0nd29yZC13cmFwOiBicmVhay13 b3JkOy13ZWJraXQtbmJzcC1tb2RlOiBzcGFjZTsNCi13ZWJraXQtbGluZS1icmVhazogYWZ0ZXIt d2hpdGUtc3BhY2UnPg0KDQo8ZGl2IGNsYXNzPVNlY3Rpb24xPg0KDQo8cCBjbGFzcz1Nc29Ob3Jt YWw+PGZvbnQgc2l6ZT0yIGZhY2U9QXJpYWw+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9J2ZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMC4wcHQ7 DQpmb250LWZhbWlseTpBcmlhbCc+U3VwcG9ydCE8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L2ZvbnQ+PC9w Pg0KDQo8cCBjbGFzcz1Nc29Ob3JtYWw+PGZvbnQgc2l6ZT0yIGZhY2U9QXJpYWw+PHNwYW4gc3R5 bGU9J2ZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMC4wcHQ7DQpmb250LWZhbWlseTpBcmlhbCc+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286 cD48L3NwYW4+PC9mb250PjwvcD4NCg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9TXNvTm9ybWFsPjxmb250IHNpemU9MiBm YWNlPUFyaWFsPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSdmb250LXNpemU6MTAuMHB0Ow0KZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6QXJp YWwnPlJlZ2FyZHMsPGJyPg0KTWFudWVsPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9mb250PjwvcD4NCg0K PHAgY2xhc3M9TXNvTm9ybWFsPjxmb250IHNpemU9MiBmYWNlPUFyaWFsPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSdm b250LXNpemU6MTAuMHB0Ow0KZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6QXJpYWwnPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9z cGFuPjwvZm9udD48L3A+DQoNCjxkaXYgc3R5bGU9J2JvcmRlcjpub25lO2JvcmRlci1sZWZ0OnNv bGlkIGJsdWUgMS41cHQ7cGFkZGluZzowY20gMGNtIDBjbSA0LjBwdCc+DQoNCjxkaXY+DQoNCjxk aXYgY2xhc3M9TXNvTm9ybWFsIGFsaWduPWNlbnRlciBzdHlsZT0ndGV4dC1hbGlnbjpjZW50ZXIn Pjxmb250IHNpemU9Mw0KZmFjZT0iVGltZXMgTmV3IFJvbWFuIj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0nZm9udC1z aXplOjEyLjBwdCc+DQoNCjxociBzaXplPTIgd2lkdGg9IjEwMCUiIGFsaWduPWNlbnRlciB0YWJp bmRleD0tMT4NCg0KPC9zcGFuPjwvZm9udD48L2Rpdj4NCg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9TXNvTm9ybWFsPjxi Pjxmb250IHNpemU9MiBmYWNlPVRhaG9tYT48c3BhbiBsYW5nPUVOLUdCDQpzdHlsZT0nZm9udC1z aXplOjEwLjBwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTpUYWhvbWE7Zm9udC13ZWlnaHQ6Ym9sZCc+RnJvbTo8L3Nw YW4+PC9mb250PjwvYj48Zm9udA0Kc2l6ZT0yIGZhY2U9VGFob21hPjxzcGFuIGxhbmc9RU4tR0Ig c3R5bGU9J2ZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMC4wcHQ7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6VGFob21hJz4NCmwydnBuLWJvdW5j ZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmcgW21haWx0bzpsMnZwbi1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnXSA8Yj48c3Bhbg0Kc3R5 bGU9J2ZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0OmJvbGQnPk9uIEJlaGFsZiBPZiA8L3NwYW4+PC9iPkJpdGFyLCBOYWJp bCBOPGJyPg0KPGI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9J2ZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0OmJvbGQnPlNlbnQ6PC9zcGFuPjwv Yj4gRnJpZGF5LCBEZWNlbWJlciAxNiwgMjAxMQ0KMzoxNiA8L3NwYW4+PC9mb250Pjxmb250IHNp emU9MiBmYWNlPVRhaG9tYT48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0nZm9udC1zaXplOjEwLjBwdDsNCmZvbnQtZmFt aWx5OlRhaG9tYSc+UE08YnI+DQo8Yj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0nZm9udC13ZWlnaHQ6Ym9sZCc+VG86 PC9zcGFuPjwvYj4gbDJ2cG5AaWV0Zi5vcmc8YnI+DQo8Yj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0nZm9udC13ZWln aHQ6Ym9sZCc+Q2M6PC9zcGFuPjwvYj4gR2lsZXMgSGVyb248YnI+DQo8Yj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0n Zm9udC13ZWlnaHQ6Ym9sZCc+U3ViamVjdDo8L3NwYW4+PC9iPiBbbDJ2cG5dIFdHIFBvbGwgZm9y DQphZG9wdGluZyB0aGUgZHJhZnQgwrNBIEZyYW1ld29yayBmb3IgRS1UcmVlIFNlcnZpY2Ugb3Zl ciBNUExTIE5ldHdvcmvCsiBhcyBhIFdHDQpkb2N1bWVudDwvc3Bhbj48L2ZvbnQ+PG86cD48L286 cD48L3A+DQoNCjwvZGl2Pg0KDQo8cCBjbGFzcz1Nc29Ob3JtYWw+PGZvbnQgc2l6ZT0zIGZhY2U9 IlRpbWVzIE5ldyBSb21hbiI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9J2ZvbnQtc2l6ZToNCjEyLjBwdCc+PG86cD4m bmJzcDs8L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9mb250PjwvcD4NCg0KPGRpdj4NCg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9TXNvTm9y bWFsPjxzcGFuIGNsYXNzPWFwcGxlLXN0eWxlLXNwYW4+PGZvbnQgc2l6ZT0zIGNvbG9yPWJsYWNr DQpmYWNlPSJUaW1lcyBOZXcgUm9tYW4iPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSdmb250LXNpemU6MTIuMHB0O2Nv bG9yOmJsYWNrJz5IaSw8L3NwYW4+PC9mb250Pjwvc3Bhbj48Zm9udA0Kc2l6ZT0yIGNvbG9yPWJs YWNrIGZhY2U9Q2FsaWJyaT48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0nZm9udC1zaXplOjEwLjVwdDtmb250LWZhbWls eTpDYWxpYnJpOw0KY29sb3I6YmxhY2snPjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvZm9udD48L3A+DQoN CjwvZGl2Pg0KDQo8ZGl2Pg0KDQo8cCBjbGFzcz1Nc29Ob3JtYWw+PGZvbnQgc2l6ZT0yIGNvbG9y PWJsYWNrIGZhY2U9Q2FsaWJyaT48c3Bhbg0Kc3R5bGU9J2ZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMC41cHQ7Zm9udC1m YW1pbHk6Q2FsaWJyaTtjb2xvcjpibGFjayc+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9mb250 PjwvcD4NCg0KPC9kaXY+DQoNCjxkaXY+DQoNCjxwIGNsYXNzPU1zb05vcm1hbD48c3BhbiBjbGFz cz1hcHBsZS1zdHlsZS1zcGFuPjxmb250IHNpemU9MyBjb2xvcj1ibGFjaw0KZmFjZT0iVGltZXMg TmV3IFJvbWFuIj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0nZm9udC1zaXplOjEyLjBwdDtjb2xvcjpibGFjayc+VGhp cyBpcyB0aGUNCnN0YXJ0IG9mIGEgdGhyZWUtd2VlayB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwIHBvbGwgZm9yIGFk b3B0aW5nIHRoZSBkcmFmdCDigJxBIEZyYW1ld29yaw0KZm9yIEUtVHJlZSBTZXJ2aWNlIG92ZXIg TVBMUyBOZXR3b3Jr4oCdIGFzIGFuIEwyVlBOIFdHIGRvY3VtZW50LiZuYnNwOzwvc3Bhbj48L2Zv bnQ+PC9zcGFuPjxmb250DQpzaXplPTIgY29sb3I9YmxhY2sgZmFjZT1DYWxpYnJpPjxzcGFuIHN0 eWxlPSdmb250LXNpemU6MTAuNXB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OkNhbGlicmk7DQpjb2xvcjpibGFjayc+ PG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9mb250PjwvcD4NCg0KPC9kaXY+DQoNCjxkaXY+DQoNCjxwIGNs YXNzPU1zb05vcm1hbD48Zm9udCBzaXplPTIgY29sb3I9YmxhY2sgZmFjZT1DYWxpYnJpPjxzcGFu DQpzdHlsZT0nZm9udC1zaXplOjEwLjVwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTpDYWxpYnJpO2NvbG9yOmJsYWNr Jz48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L2ZvbnQ+PC9wPg0KDQo8L2Rpdj4NCg0KPGRpdj4N Cg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9TXNvTm9ybWFsPjxzcGFuIGNsYXNzPWFwcGxlLXN0eWxlLXNwYW4+PGZvbnQg c2l6ZT0zIGNvbG9yPWJsYWNrDQpmYWNlPSJUaW1lcyBOZXcgUm9tYW4iPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSdm b250LXNpemU6MTIuMHB0O2NvbG9yOmJsYWNrJz5UaGUgZHJhZnQgY2FuDQpiZSBmb3VuZCBhdCZu YnNwOzxhDQpocmVmPSJodHRwOi8vdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmcvaHRtbC9kcmFmdC1rZXktbDJ2cG4t ZXRyZWUtZnJ3ay0wNiI+aHR0cDovL3Rvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnL2h0bWwvZHJhZnQta2V5LWwydnBu LWV0cmVlLWZyd2stMDY8L2E+Jm5ic3A7Ljwvc3Bhbj48L2ZvbnQ+PC9zcGFuPjxmb250DQpjb2xv cj1ibGFjaz48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0nY29sb3I6YmxhY2snPjxicj4NCjxzcGFuIGNsYXNzPWFwcGxl LXN0eWxlLXNwYW4+Jm5ic3A7PC9zcGFuPjxicj4NCjxzcGFuIGNsYXNzPWFwcGxlLXN0eWxlLXNw YW4+UGxlYXNlLCByZXZpZXcgdGhlIGRyYWZ0IGFuZCBzZW5kIGFueSBjb21tZW50cyB0bw0KdGhl IEwyVlBOIHdvcmtpbmcgZ3JvdXAgZW1haWwgbGlzdC4mbmJzcDs8L3NwYW4+PGJyPg0KPGJyPg0K PHNwYW4gY2xhc3M9YXBwbGUtc3R5bGUtc3Bhbj5UaGlzIFdHIHBvbGwgd2lsbCBjbG9zZSBvbiBG cmlkYXkgSmFudWFyeSA2LCAyMDEyLjwvc3Bhbj48YnI+DQo8c3BhbiBjbGFzcz1hcHBsZS1zdHls ZS1zcGFuPiZuYnNwOzwvc3Bhbj48YnI+DQo8c3BhbiBjbGFzcz1hcHBsZS1zdHlsZS1zcGFuPlJl Z2FyZHMsPC9zcGFuPjxicj4NCjxzcGFuIGNsYXNzPWFwcGxlLXN0eWxlLXNwYW4+TmFiaWwmbmJz cDs8L3NwYW4+PC9zcGFuPjwvZm9udD48Zm9udCBzaXplPTINCmNvbG9yPWJsYWNrIGZhY2U9Q2Fs aWJyaT48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0nZm9udC1zaXplOjEwLjVwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTpDYWxpYnJpOw0K Y29sb3I6YmxhY2snPjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9zcGFuPjwvZm9udD48L3A+DQoNCjwvZGl2Pg0KDQo8 L2Rpdj4NCg0KPC9kaXY+DQoNCjwvYm9keT4NCg0KPC9odG1sPg0K --_000_9435EDACD941174099E143BCA2BCD615F8E1BFDDA9HE101452emea1_-- From internet-drafts@ietf.org Fri Jan 6 19:23:09 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C7D21F85A6; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 19:23:09 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.554 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.554 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.045, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cnNa2tJU7PSR; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 19:23:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B6CF21F85A1; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 19:23:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpws-iw-oam-03.txt X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 3.64p1 Message-ID: <20120107032309.22617.19812.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 19:23:09 -0800 Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 03:23:09 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Work= ing Group of the IETF. Title : OAM Procedures for VPWS Interworking Author(s) : Mustapha Aissaoui Peter B. Busschbach Dave Allan Monique Morrow Thomas Nadeau Filename : draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpws-iw-oam-03.txt Pages : 12 Date : 2012-01-06 This draft proposes OAM procedures for the Ethernet interworking, IP interworking and FR-ATM interworking Virtual Private Wire Service (VPWS). A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpws-iw-oam-03.txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpws-iw-oam-03.txt From giles.heron@gmail.com Mon Jan 9 02:34:44 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1171B21F8509 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 02:34:44 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RNrCnDCXtfsw for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 02:34:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com (mail-we0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E899521F8429 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 02:34:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by werb14 with SMTP id b14so3039787wer.31 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 02:34:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6BvIRe48N9dTc2LXp3VBZDt6A1YndNnBmwv4bOrK6WM=; b=dErJsyhWo2Z0kFWIIucPGMlC2W2SwN+KwfNqNtJdRRXd8Xnzj/4AR3sVmeKJxy8Bsn 55bDAWcL1DHRQg2RTzaMh6oVnMJX157o81xfL5yY3XLj0W9FPsuf1USoQEOuoqPjUQXW CkKju6AcCKT0LyBQsCj4n0kX07TLpTBZUdl8I= Received: by 10.216.139.15 with SMTP id b15mr7225790wej.15.1326105281066; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 02:34:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.55.89.127] (64-103-25-233.cisco.com. [64.103.25.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v28sm37183025wbo.18.2012.01.09.02.34.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 09 Jan 2012 02:34:40 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.32.0.111121 Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 10:34:38 +0000 Subject: Last call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-iw-oam From: Giles Heron To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Last call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-iw-oam Thread-Index: AczOukmLdcHJvnh/4EiooRa7XxsDEg== Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 10:34:44 -0000 This email starts a two-week working group last call for the draft "OAM Procedures for VPWS Interworking". The draft can be found at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpws-iw-oam-03 Please review the draft and send any comments to the L2VPN WG email list. This WG last call will close on Monday January 23rd 2012. Giles From giles.heron@gmail.com Mon Jan 9 10:39:50 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACBE921F86A0 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 10:39:50 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gdRpEEGkRddA for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 10:39:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1EA921F869D for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 10:39:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by wibhj6 with SMTP id hj6so3628361wib.31 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 10:39:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=bmT48PZTXHdZCM20qA1SN9sIX905LEGZ1i2fDEdaFUI=; b=d0XI+ZN+CB4bj9l3UHsQc2fZmcjr5oHIdz36zLaY8U2sjskBqaTPdhhqpU3Y2/8eo3 7qu8DgQ2GI+Grke/dBS+l3I0BEepkgwGJWmIsWUkCxbXJ0scnMyM9qfui5C/fqwFIAtL Ra/aBShWstS+PwmdRGcmknua95V7+bUxKoRNs= Received: by 10.180.19.42 with SMTP id b10mr6759957wie.13.1326134387733; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 10:39:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.55.89.186] (64-103-25-233.cisco.com. [64.103.25.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h13sm16076268wbn.17.2012.01.09.10.39.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 09 Jan 2012 10:39:46 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.32.0.111121 Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:39:44 +0000 Subject: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn From: Giles Heron To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-Index: AcyQBRR+BnU8yNibqEe6U5jsOUZ2Xw++PmW4 In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:39:50 -0000 This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-04 should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. Now that we've accepted the requirements and framework drafts (I think Nabil's about to send email to the list re the framework!), it's time to start considering whether the solutions drafts we have (this draft and the pbb-epvn draft) are the right basis for our solutions docs. Please review the draft and respond by Monday January 23rd with comments as to its suitability for WG adoption. Giles From wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com Mon Jan 9 11:12:45 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B961911E8086 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 11:12:45 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.249 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2ZquFlsnmN7J for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 11:12:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from smail6.alcatel.fr (smail6.alcatel.fr [64.208.49.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A2E011E8072 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 11:12:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from FRMRSSXCHHUB04.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (FRMRSSXCHHUB04.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com [135.120.45.64]) by smail6.alcatel.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/ICT) with ESMTP id q09JAvYY006981 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 9 Jan 2012 20:12:43 +0100 Received: from FRMRSSXCHMBSB1.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.40]) by FRMRSSXCHHUB04.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.64]) with mapi; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 20:11:06 +0100 From: "Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" To: Giles Heron , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 20:11:04 +0100 Subject: RE: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-Topic: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-Index: AcyQBRR+BnU8yNibqEe6U5jsOUZ2Xw++PmW4AAEXNQA= Message-ID: <14C7F4F06DB5814AB0DE29716C4F6D671CD311C3@FRMRSSXCHMBSB1.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: nl-NL, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: nl-NL, en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.69 on 155.132.188.84 X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 19:12:45 -0000 Support as a co-author -----Original Message----- From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of G= iles Heron Sent: maandag 9 januari 2012 19:40 To: l2vpn@ietf.org Subject: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: =20 http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-04 should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. Now that we've accepted the requirements and framework drafts (I think Nabil's about to send email to the list re the framework!), it's time to start considering whether the solutions drafts we have (this draft and the pbb-epvn draft) are the right basis for our solutions docs. Please review the draft and respond by Monday January 23rd with comments as to its suitability for WG adoption. Giles From vishwas.ietf@gmail.com Mon Jan 9 11:57:17 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2558D21F8748 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 11:57:17 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u+iqPQq1Dcxu for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 11:57:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-tul01m020-f172.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CB2721F8709 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 11:57:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by obcuz6 with SMTP id uz6so5083585obc.31 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 11:57:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=1UJ4jp20JT+NUKu7c8MTaX/BPIa6p/gtATDvKWaPeQo=; b=upmRyH227oeSoKnBOrta3OR7NtnJ+Ee4KpbX8zRY6efyx+q1MeS09aUOTMZGsr82Jo IBtlOwOrgWcCUbMAOVWC1BQHrLRPt4CncM72gUdGgvkRjZy736gSOp0sj67HNbGz67C7 WAhuu2m8ts4I6yo+9Lf6gP390ECZHZufuWPt0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.116.38 with SMTP id jt6mr6170949obb.52.1326139036310; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 11:57:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.28.196 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 11:57:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 11:57:16 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn From: Vishwas Manral To: Giles Heron Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 19:57:17 -0000 Support the work. -Vishwas On 1/9/12, Giles Heron wrote: > This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-04 > > should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. > > Now that we've accepted the requirements and framework drafts (I think > Nabil's about to send email to the list re the framework!), it's time to > start considering whether the solutions drafts we have (this draft and the > pbb-epvn draft) are the right basis for our solutions docs. > > Please review the draft and respond by Monday January 23rd with comments as > to its suitability for WG adoption. > > Giles > > > From jdrake@juniper.net Mon Jan 9 12:03:27 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7BAB1F0C3E for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:03:27 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.838 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.838 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.761, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UhYpkkxyX7un for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:03:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from exprod7og113.obsmtp.com (exprod7og113.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F6DE1F0C36 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:03:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob113.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTwtIDDcB5hvneZbIzZQwteeL+fbGiyx4@postini.com; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 12:03:27 PST Received: from EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::c821:7c81:f21f:8bc7]) by P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net ([::1]) with mapi; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:02:12 -0800 From: John E Drake To: Giles Heron , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:02:10 -0800 Subject: RE: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-Topic: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-Index: AcyQBRR+BnU8yNibqEe6U5jsOUZ2Xw++PmW4AALfs7A= Message-ID: <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB333163A54C3AA77E@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 20:03:28 -0000 Support > -----Original Message----- > From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of Giles Heron > Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 10:40 AM > To: l2vpn@ietf.org > Subject: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn >=20 > This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: >=20 > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-04 >=20 > should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. >=20 > Now that we've accepted the requirements and framework drafts (I think > Nabil's about to send email to the list re the framework!), it's time > to > start considering whether the solutions drafts we have (this draft and > the > pbb-epvn draft) are the right basis for our solutions docs. >=20 > Please review the draft and respond by Monday January 23rd with > comments as > to its suitability for WG adoption. >=20 > Giles >=20 From nmohammad@juniper.net Mon Jan 9 12:06:06 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7608621F849C for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:06:06 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SKjV9fZDs34i for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:06:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from exprod7og124.obsmtp.com (exprod7og124.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.26]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0711321F849B for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:06:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob124.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTwtIrKVfFZ7h7m5XKCpnYCtYquklP1Pp@postini.com; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 12:06:05 PST Received: from p-emfe02-wf.jnpr.net (172.28.145.25) by P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:04:42 -0800 Received: from EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net ([fe80::1914:3299:33d9:e43b]) by p-emfe02-wf.jnpr.net ([fe80::c126:c633:d2dc:8090%11]) with mapi; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 15:04:41 -0500 From: Nadeem Mohammad To: Giles Heron , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 15:04:41 -0500 Subject: RE: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-Topic: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-Index: AcyQBRR+BnU8yNibqEe6U5jsOUZ2Xw++PmW4AALfs7AAABI+kA== Message-ID: References: <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB333163A54C3AA77E@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net> In-Reply-To: <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB333163A54C3AA77E@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 20:06:06 -0000 Support Nadeem. -----Original Message----- From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of J= ohn E Drake Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 3:02 PM To: Giles Heron; l2vpn@ietf.org Subject: RE: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Support > -----Original Message----- > From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of Giles Heron > Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 10:40 AM > To: l2vpn@ietf.org > Subject: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn >=20 > This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: >=20 > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-04 >=20 > should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. >=20 > Now that we've accepted the requirements and framework drafts (I think > Nabil's about to send email to the list re the framework!), it's time > to > start considering whether the solutions drafts we have (this draft and > the > pbb-epvn draft) are the right basis for our solutions docs. >=20 > Please review the draft and respond by Monday January 23rd with > comments as > to its suitability for WG adoption. >=20 > Giles >=20 From manishgupta@juniper.net Mon Jan 9 12:29:44 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E8221F8532 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:29:44 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08ZlpB1ssBrX for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:29:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from exprod7og114.obsmtp.com (exprod7og114.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.215]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9CD321F8531 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:29:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob114.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTwtONzRvpRv3bCmZQLOTf7NuBPwm46U8@postini.com; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 12:29:43 PST Received: from EMBX02-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::18fe:d666:b43e:f97e]) by P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net ([::1]) with mapi; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:29:23 -0800 From: Manish Gupta To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:29:22 -0800 Subject: RE: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-Topic: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-Index: AczPCU8rEJMGHnOfRlqraBqYoPFgIAAA5RGQ Message-ID: <05542EC42316164383B5180707A489EE1FC61032BD@EMBX02-HQ.jnpr.net> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 20:29:44 -0000 Definitely support it. -Manish On 1/9/12, Giles Heron wrote: > This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-04 > > should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. > > Now that we've accepted the requirements and framework drafts (I think=20 > Nabil's about to send email to the list re the framework!), it's time=20 > to start considering whether the solutions drafts we have (this draft=20 > and the pbb-epvn draft) are the right basis for our solutions docs. > > Please review the draft and respond by Monday January 23rd with=20 > comments as to its suitability for WG adoption. > > Giles > > > From akatlas@gmail.com Mon Jan 9 12:37:59 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95CF211E807A for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:37:59 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X7XY2vfuAo0T for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:37:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com (mail-gy0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A037011E8079 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:37:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by ghbg18 with SMTP id g18so2015503ghb.31 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 12:37:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=xDYuOD8lrgRtnIdlHbfIh4/DJOTjZG1lEIfXQVaoUw8=; b=XdRPGoCyPKKkYoAiQjU3BEF4pbGXnpchm1RSBhm/4yeZF+hH2GVMUG5xM5cVINrumh tQIqp++YI+lCBRicdi0PlrgB9+qfnRw/9FR4DfJ/Z5khV+Xh9OxHOQa8cj7wq3TDxU6s rriS9F0tt1Ta+a1zNVGCOGdql3ONXbrRomPj8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.155.104 with SMTP id i68mr22493553yhk.37.1326141478113; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 12:37:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.146.195.18 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:37:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB333163A54C3AA77E@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net> References: <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB333163A54C3AA77E@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net> Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 15:37:58 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn From: Alia Atlas To: Giles Heron , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 20:37:59 -0000 Support > -----Original Message----- > From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of Giles Heron > Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 10:40 AM > To: l2vpn@ietf.org > Subject: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn > > This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-04 > > should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. > > Now that we've accepted the requirements and framework drafts (I think > Nabil's about to send email to the list re the framework!), it's time > to > start considering whether the solutions drafts we have (this draft and > the > pbb-epvn draft) are the right basis for our solutions docs. > > Please review the draft and respond by Monday January 23rd with > comments as > to its suitability for WG adoption. > > Giles From nick.delregno@verizon.com Mon Jan 9 12:51:00 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D10E21F8577 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:51:00 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XcTjA7HPgzlb for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:50:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from fldsmtpe01.verizon.com (fldsmtpe01.verizon.com [140.108.26.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0870121F853F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:50:58 -0800 (PST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: false Received: from unknown (HELO fldsmtpi01.verizon.com) ([166.68.71.143]) by fldsmtpe01.verizon.com with ESMTP; 09 Jan 2012 20:50:57 +0000 From: "DelRegno, Christopher N (Nick)" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,482,1320624000"; d="scan'208";a="203522783" Received: from fhdp1lumxc7hb01.verizon.com (HELO FHDP1LUMXC7HB01.us.one.verizon.com) ([166.68.59.188]) by fldsmtpi01.verizon.com with ESMTP; 09 Jan 2012 20:50:52 +0000 Received: from FHDP1LUMXC7V42.us.one.verizon.com ([169.254.2.126]) by FHDP1LUMXC7HB01.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.59.188]) with mapi; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 15:50:51 -0500 To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 15:51:06 -0500 Subject: RE: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-Topic: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-Index: AcyQBRR+BnU8yNibqEe6U5jsOUZ2Xw++PmW4AASUrRA= Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 20:51:00 -0000 Support. Nick -----Original Message----- From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of G= iles Heron Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 12:40 PM To: l2vpn@ietf.org Subject: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: =20 http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-04 should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. Now that we've accepted the requirements and framework drafts (I think Nabi= l's about to send email to the list re the framework!), it's time to start = considering whether the solutions drafts we have (this draft and the pbb-ep= vn draft) are the right basis for our solutions docs. Please review the draft and respond by Monday January 23rd with comments as= to its suitability for WG adoption. Giles From sajassi@cisco.com Mon Jan 9 13:01:38 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2B4C11E807A for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 13:01:37 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bzcZZTkboANy for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 13:01:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from mtv-iport-4.cisco.com (mtv-iport-4.cisco.com [173.36.130.15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7343B11E8075 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 13:01:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=sajassi@cisco.com; l=916; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1326142895; x=1327352495; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date: message-id:in-reply-to:references:from:to; bh=0gFjnz9NYqmEUuTIrngI+u/mYVv/znL1EnIZe+KwkzY=; b=CeU7Hiu4vrqlEyMM94tzGEPkCdMOLHkTtLFyk+jMrm4D8D6Sn0mcQy92 ioGsJdoz7x3CnIkHgKKpwjTq/9NIO8Aaxx+fiJZvfdaKv7+xd7doTv9fC 40PF6T8zOnq7rMNwuwH25AafBJAi2FeOgGrSwS2xjwA6+EAaI03v9aCJ5 Q=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAHpUC0+rRDoH/2dsb2JhbABErFOBBYFyAQEBBBIBHQpLBAIBCBEEAQELBhcBBgFFCQgBAQQBEggTB4dgmBYBnlCLLmMEiDmfKQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,482,1320624000"; d="scan'208";a="24430598" Received: from mtv-core-2.cisco.com ([171.68.58.7]) by mtv-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Jan 2012 21:01:32 +0000 Received: from xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-221.cisco.com [128.107.191.63]) by mtv-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q09L1WTH025298; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 21:01:32 GMT Received: from xmb-sjc-22d.amer.cisco.com ([128.107.191.68]) by xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 9 Jan 2012 13:01:32 -0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 13:00:37 -0800 Message-ID: <7F115A41909B2641A9550322C4DF9D5608A69C2B@xmb-sjc-22d.amer.cisco.com> In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-Index: AcyQBRR+BnU8yNibqEe6U5jsOUZ2Xw++PmW4AATdKmA= References: From: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" To: "Giles Heron" , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jan 2012 21:01:32.0621 (UTC) FILETIME=[DD9ADFD0:01CCCF11] X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 21:01:38 -0000 Support as co-editor. -Ali > -----Original Message----- > From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of Giles Heron > Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 10:40 AM > To: l2vpn@ietf.org > Subject: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn >=20 > This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: >=20 > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-04 >=20 > should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. >=20 > Now that we've accepted the requirements and framework drafts (I think > Nabil's about to send email to the list re the framework!), it's time > to > start considering whether the solutions drafts we have (this draft and > the > pbb-epvn draft) are the right basis for our solutions docs. >=20 > Please review the draft and respond by Monday January 23rd with > comments as > to its suitability for WG adoption. >=20 > Giles >=20 From florin.balus@alcatel-lucent.com Mon Jan 9 14:30:06 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B55DD11E80CA for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 14:30:06 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hKeDV2imvxY1 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 14:30:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from ihemail1.lucent.com (ihemail1.lucent.com [135.245.0.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 195CA11E80C8 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 14:30:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.12]) by ihemail1.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id q09MU4EC004362 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 9 Jan 2012 16:30:04 -0600 (CST) Received: from USNAVSXCHHUB01.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsxchhub01.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.110]) by usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id q09MU47N006150 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 9 Jan 2012 16:30:04 -0600 Received: from USNAVSXCHMBSC3.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.3.39.139]) by USNAVSXCHHUB01.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.3.39.110]) with mapi; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 16:30:04 -0600 From: "Balus, Florin Stelian (Florin)" To: Giles Heron , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 16:30:02 -0600 Subject: RE: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-Topic: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-Index: AcyQBRR+BnU8yNibqEe6U5jsOUZ2Xw++PmW4AAgGA8A= Message-ID: <2073A6C5467C99478898544C6EBA3F4602BE7149F4@USNAVSXCHMBSC3.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.33 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 135.3.39.12 X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 22:30:06 -0000 Support as a co-author. > -----Original Message----- > From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Giles Heron > Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 10:40 AM > To: l2vpn@ietf.org > Subject: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn >=20 > This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: >=20 > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-04 >=20 > should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. >=20 > Now that we've accepted the requirements and framework drafts (I think > Nabil's about to send email to the list re the framework!), it's time to > start considering whether the solutions drafts we have (this draft and th= e > pbb-epvn draft) are the right basis for our solutions docs. >=20 > Please review the draft and respond by Monday January 23rd with comments = as > to its suitability for WG adoption. >=20 > Giles >=20 From keyupate@cisco.com Mon Jan 9 14:32:38 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85A5511E80D0 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 14:32:38 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.566 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.566 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.034, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gqb8gXhDxTtC for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 14:32:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from mtv-iport-2.cisco.com (mtv-iport-2.cisco.com [173.36.130.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CADCF11E80C8 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 14:32:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=keyupate@cisco.com; l=714; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1326148357; x=1327357957; h=date:subject:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=H2unYqozhxOpDtkSM+PNH5CPeR3KkWbz/MxtGHqRxHk=; b=YL46j6HNoJ+KXoqDFmk0eLkXuyHOUYOtpF1aElpVu7FiWwrgAjKlcSv7 fgdSyE3u1CXK6aqly1Q/i672DtF3AqXDJykrxX4etMvjlh0MAL9OzHTRS 0z+rW6EupuPFYKCxCLR1sELdsZv/KdhfHqHKGv9AAqChxBIt1ne5qh4A7 c=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EAI5qC0+rRDoJ/2dsb2JhbABDrFOBBYFyAQEBAwESAScCAUENAQhnNgEBBAESGweHWAiYCgGeWIwRBIg5jE+KdIdm X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,482,1320624000"; d="scan'208";a="24541965" Received: from mtv-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.58.9]) by mtv-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Jan 2012 22:32:37 +0000 Received: from xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-231.cisco.com [128.107.191.100]) by mtv-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q09MWbtr032047; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 22:32:37 GMT Received: from xmb-sjc-239.amer.cisco.com ([128.107.191.105]) by xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 9 Jan 2012 14:32:37 -0800 Received: from 10.21.146.153 ([10.21.146.153]) by xmb-sjc-239.amer.cisco.com ([128.107.191.105]) via Exchange Front-End Server email.cisco.com ([128.107.191.32]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 22:32:36 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.31.0.110725 Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 14:33:04 -0800 Subject: Re: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn From: Keyur Patel To: Giles Heron , Message-ID: Thread-Topic: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-Index: AcyQBRR+BnU8yNibqEe6U5jsOUZ2Xw++PmW4AAgmKfY= In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jan 2012 22:32:37.0391 (UTC) FILETIME=[96DC99F0:01CCCF1E] X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 22:32:38 -0000 Support. Regards, Keyur On 1/9/12 10:39 AM, "Giles Heron" wrote: > This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-04 > > should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. > > Now that we've accepted the requirements and framework drafts (I think > Nabil's about to send email to the list re the framework!), it's time to > start considering whether the solutions drafts we have (this draft and the > pbb-epvn draft) are the right basis for our solutions docs. > > Please review the draft and respond by Monday January 23rd with comments as > to its suitability for WG adoption. > > Giles > > From nitinb@juniper.net Mon Jan 9 14:46:41 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4199321F85DF for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 14:46:41 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yLkuIvk5GlL3 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 14:46:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from exprod7og117.obsmtp.com (exprod7og117.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6262821F85AC for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 14:46:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob117.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTwtuSIx9sCu1YYMJFftmJd2r1bn5TOeQ@postini.com; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 14:46:40 PST Received: from EMBX02-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::18fe:d666:b43e:f97e]) by P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::fc92:eb1:759:2c72%11]) with mapi; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 14:44:23 -0800 From: Nitin Bahadur To: Giles Heron , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 14:44:18 -0800 Subject: Re: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-Topic: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-Index: AcyQBRR+BnU8yNibqEe6U5jsOUZ2Xw++PmW4AAiKmGE= Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 22:46:41 -0000 Support. On 1/9/12 10:39 AM, "Giles Heron" wrote: This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-04 should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. Now that we've accepted the requirements and framework drafts (I think Nabil's about to send email to the list re the framework!), it's time to start considering whether the solutions drafts we have (this draft and the pbb-epvn draft) are the right basis for our solutions docs. Please review the draft and respond by Monday January 23rd with comments as to its suitability for WG adoption. Giles From jeff.tantsura@ericsson.com Mon Jan 9 14:48:54 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E9821F85DD for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 14:48:54 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.39 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.39 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.209, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6RmT-G6D3Vqk for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 14:48:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from imr4.ericy.com (imr4.ericy.com [198.24.6.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 156E421F85AC for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 14:48:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from eusaamw0706.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.31]) by imr4.ericy.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id q09Mmpwa000763; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 16:48:52 -0600 Received: from EUSAACMS0701.eamcs.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.20]) by eusaamw0706.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.31]) with mapi; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:48:46 -0500 From: Jeff Tantsura To: Giles Heron Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:48:41 -0500 Subject: Re: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-Topic: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-Index: AczPINg9rL5zIK0dTrmnAkZrw0+Kmw== Message-ID: <05EE7843-E5DD-4075-97FC-854B70443FA9@ericsson.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 22:48:54 -0000 Yes/support Regards, Jeff On Jan 9, 2012, at 13:39, "Giles Heron" wrote: > This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: >=20 > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-04 >=20 > should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. >=20 > Now that we've accepted the requirements and framework drafts (I think > Nabil's about to send email to the list re the framework!), it's time to > start considering whether the solutions drafts we have (this draft and th= e > pbb-epvn draft) are the right basis for our solutions docs. >=20 > Please review the draft and respond by Monday January 23rd with comments = as > to its suitability for WG adoption. >=20 > Giles >=20 >=20 From psampath@juniper.net Mon Jan 9 14:57:30 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FF9221F86FE for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 14:57:30 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GnvTKSu6KkVo for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 14:57:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from exprod7og118.obsmtp.com (exprod7og118.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.8]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 944CB21F86FD for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 14:57:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from P-EMHUB02-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob118.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTwtw2JHHd/vFi/opI91IMtf/LMzVeVtk@postini.com; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 14:57:29 PST Received: from EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::c821:7c81:f21f:8bc7]) by P-EMHUB02-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::88f9:77fd:dfc:4d51%11]) with mapi; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 14:55:13 -0800 From: Prabakaran Thirumali Sampath To: Giles Heron , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 14:55:12 -0800 Subject: RE: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-Topic: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-Index: AcyQBRR+BnU8yNibqEe6U5jsOUZ2Xw++PmW4AAjlexA= Message-ID: <497B6D90E0023142AF34948DEFFAB38D453D4C41EF@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 22:57:30 -0000 Support Regards, Prabakaran T Sampath -----Original Message----- From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of G= iles Heron Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 10:40 AM To: l2vpn@ietf.org Subject: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: =20 http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-04 should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. Now that we've accepted the requirements and framework drafts (I think Nabi= l's about to send email to the list re the framework!), it's time to start = considering whether the solutions drafts we have (this draft and the pbb-ep= vn draft) are the right basis for our solutions docs. Please review the draft and respond by Monday January 23rd with comments as= to its suitability for WG adoption. Giles From paul@unbehagen.net Mon Jan 9 15:56:00 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 304B11F0C3D for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 15:56:00 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dEBXlHRSvZqn for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 15:55:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-tul01m020-f172.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A75081F0C36 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 15:55:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by obcuz6 with SMTP id uz6so5360456obc.31 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:55:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.74.66 with SMTP id r2mr16902372obv.67.1326153359329; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:55:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.1.11] (c-67-161-144-217.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [67.161.144.217]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i3sm5525887obd.2.2012.01.09.15.55.57 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 09 Jan 2012 15:55:58 -0800 (PST) References: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9A405) From: Paul Unbehagen Subject: Re: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 16:55:55 -0700 To: Giles Heron Cc: "" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 23:56:00 -0000 Support On Jan 9, 2012, at 11:39 AM, Giles Heron wrote: > This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-04 > > should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. > > Now that we've accepted the requirements and framework drafts (I think > Nabil's about to send email to the list re the framework!), it's time to > start considering whether the solutions drafts we have (this draft and the > pbb-epvn draft) are the right basis for our solutions docs. > > Please review the draft and respond by Monday January 23rd with comments as > to its suitability for WG adoption. > > Giles > > From aldrin.isaac@gmail.com Mon Jan 9 17:29:49 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2494321F8690 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:29:49 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.27 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.27 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.329, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11E8jsqQMO32 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:29:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qy0-f172.google.com (mail-qy0-f172.google.com [209.85.216.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94DF621F86EC for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:29:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by qcsf15 with SMTP id f15so2771662qcs.31 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:29:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=Xikt6XSgHOvkDLeCJUMPkGc3x+KAe0GX2AIWv7SbJQk=; b=diEfh3rEHdk2SjhXEFuyfL7cObXOZ/I55jgPUPeWlGElmC90upOLyeD78mAtV20Uwt 3QbNYqRtJkIdUgP/dxW1mfKLL4rURc1w7KLo5MEy8+e6pP2W92GffG1H8JjSgNX6v8+w 5pZejVXCTFLYehhnUrPZpHmYqswMuNaqd0N5M= Received: by 10.224.116.211 with SMTP id n19mr21958731qaq.67.1326158988150; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:29:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from mymac.home (ool-44c1c730.dyn.optonline.net. [68.193.199.48]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d5sm37422264qaj.18.2012.01.09.17.29.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:29:47 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Aldrin Isaac In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 20:29:47 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20425E06-B00E-4E60-8CE3-EAC8A4118B0F@gmail.com> References: To: Giles Heron X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 01:29:49 -0000 Support. On Jan 9, 2012, at 1:39 PM, Giles Heron wrote: > This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-04 > > should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. > > Now that we've accepted the requirements and framework drafts (I think > Nabil's about to send email to the list re the framework!), it's time to > start considering whether the solutions drafts we have (this draft and the > pbb-epvn draft) are the right basis for our solutions docs. > > Please review the draft and respond by Monday January 23rd with comments as > to its suitability for WG adoption. > > Giles > > From shtsuchi@cisco.com Mon Jan 9 18:05:42 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CDD021F858D for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 18:05:42 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GaxKmcZTJnQp for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 18:05:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA65721F8587 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 18:05:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=shtsuchi@cisco.com; l=664; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1326161141; x=1327370741; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iXLBffDeDS/K0jvEhS9netKUAA1AthmCiQ+7QTdxRWw=; b=l590awfrrNLer6bSRVuCqIlmPKlPvN+NxUE8npdBHyGXBLA69Y6DykgL rtE3M1nqBVFSBp92qrhtuDymC0EHf4+fk9kFZmu28iHJ82asLHJV0gQZF ry78SsH52UvAvYhWA48Bvaw286ClWYOgW5lQiw7TegzEiNfzp3nCvDEve o=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,484,1320624000"; d="scan'208";a="125915638" Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com ([144.254.72.81]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Jan 2012 02:05:40 +0000 Received: from [64.104.9.208] (dhcp-shinjuku-64-104-9-208.cisco.com [64.104.9.208]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q0A25cWj027219; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 02:05:39 GMT Message-ID: <4F0B9CEE.2020508@cisco.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:05:34 +0900 From: Shishio Tsuchiya User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: giles.heron@gmail.com Subject: Re: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 02:05:42 -0000 Support (2012/01/10 3:39), Giles Heron wrote: > This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-04 > > should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. > > Now that we've accepted the requirements and framework drafts (I think > Nabil's about to send email to the list re the framework!), it's time to > start considering whether the solutions drafts we have (this draft and the > pbb-epvn draft) are the right basis for our solutions docs. > > Please review the draft and respond by Monday January 23rd with comments as > to its suitability for WG adoption. > > Giles > > From bedard.phil@gmail.com Mon Jan 9 22:35:11 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D506921F8664 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 22:35:11 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 85sakpw9Hn5d for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 22:35:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com (mail-gy0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCD9221F8675 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 22:35:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by ghbg18 with SMTP id g18so2257414ghb.31 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 22:35:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date:to; bh=ZlTw1ej9U/WR3K99y1lsPfRxp/4cYXrjJx8Kwm2pFZU=; b=GmYakWQbGErJ5PDnoNLyXKPYLlPUMCArAG5AYpfm4WnNWcrzemW9VjdLZcbWnbDYvd nRPXlhW0ta1CQc8q6E20n5l9jiq+Ul6CWtGEPoHYyOUO67zPDWykCHf2AY+oFCy7649o a7n40OELnqdsWdNkJF+5IOLdGS8H1jNjs3WPY= Received: by 10.236.155.40 with SMTP id i28mr24799735yhk.130.1326177310459; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 22:35:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.103] (66-168-187-238.dhcp.gwnt.ga.charter.com. [66.168.187.238]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s12sm189763421and.15.2012.01.09.22.35.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 09 Jan 2012 22:35:09 -0800 (PST) References: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9A405) From: Phil Subject: Re: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 01:35:07 -0500 To: Giles Heron Cc: "" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:35:12 -0000 Support. On Jan 9, 2012, at 1:39 PM, Giles Heron wrote: > This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-04 > > should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. > > Now that we've accepted the requirements and framework drafts (I think > Nabil's about to send email to the list re the framework!), it's time to > start considering whether the solutions drafts we have (this draft and the > pbb-epvn draft) are the right basis for our solutions docs. > > Please review the draft and respond by Monday January 23rd with comments as > to its suitability for WG adoption. > > Giles > > From prvs=34974d622=Frederic.Jounay@orange.ch Mon Jan 9 23:52:38 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7FD521F861A for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 23:52:38 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.299 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jvw7yxaHyL7M for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 23:52:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp1.eds.ch (smtp1.eds.ch [195.160.148.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E77CA21F8631 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 23:52:37 -0800 (PST) X-ExtLoop1: 1 Received: from CHCROCHC051.orange.ch ([fe80:0000:0000:0000:704b:3a68:12.14.247.83]) by chbbochs054.orange.ch ([172.25.9.54]) with mapi; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:52:35 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jounay_Fr=E9d=E9ric?= To: Giles Heron , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:52:34 +0100 Subject: RE: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-Topic: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-Index: AcyQBRR+BnU8yNibqEe6U5jsOUZ2Xw++PmW4AAEXNQAAGpWH8A== Message-ID: <78046FD1C8FE0345AFBC11640A8DF6E20177D0DADA34@CHCROCHC051.orange.ch> References: <14C7F4F06DB5814AB0DE29716C4F6D671CD311C3@FRMRSSXCHMBSB1.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: <14C7F4F06DB5814AB0DE29716C4F6D671CD311C3@FRMRSSXCHMBSB1.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:52:38 -0000 Support. Fred -----Original Message----- From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of G= iles Heron Sent: maandag 9 januari 2012 19:40 To: l2vpn@ietf.org Subject: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: =20 http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-04 should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. Now that we've accepted the requirements and framework drafts (I think Nabi= l's about to send email to the list re the framework!), it's time to start = considering whether the solutions drafts we have (this draft and the pbb-ep= vn draft) are the right basis for our solutions docs. Please review the draft and respond by Monday January 23rd with comments as= to its suitability for WG adoption. Giles From thomas.morin@orange.com Tue Jan 10 00:14:02 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E819821F85EC for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:14:02 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.249 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uSub6DtCMPIc for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:14:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com [195.101.245.16]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FB7B21F85E9 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:14:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 586531074010 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:14:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.47]) by p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53883107400F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:14:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from ftrdmel1.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.40]) by ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:14:00 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Received: from 10.193.21.180 ([10.193.21.180]) by ftrdmel1.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.40]) via Exchange Front-End Server owa.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.53]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:13:59 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Organization: France Telecom Orange User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Re: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:14:29 +0100 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-Index: AczPb85EG1OnYN+yRP+CqeI9dlNUtg== References: From: To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Jan 2012 08:14:00.0205 (UTC) FILETIME=[CEA39BD0:01CCCF6F] X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:14:03 -0000 U3VwcG9ydC4NCg0KLVRob21hcw0KDQpHaWxlcyBIZXJvbiBhIMOpY3JpdCA6DQo+IFRoaXMgaXMg YSByZXF1ZXN0IHRvIGdhdWdlIGNvbnNlbnN1cyBhcyB0byB3aGV0aGVyOg0KPg0KPiBodHRwOi8v dG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmcvaHRtbC9kcmFmdC1yYWdnYXJ3YS1zYWphc3NpLWwydnBuLWV2cG4tMDQN Cj4NCj4gc2hvdWxkIGJlIGFjY2VwdGVkIGFzIGFuIEwyVlBOIFdHIGRyYWZ0Lg0KPg0KPiBOb3cg dGhhdCB3ZSd2ZSBhY2NlcHRlZCB0aGUgcmVxdWlyZW1lbnRzIGFuZCBmcmFtZXdvcmsgZHJhZnRz IChJIHRoaW5rDQo+IE5hYmlsJ3MgYWJvdXQgdG8gc2VuZCBlbWFpbCB0byB0aGUgbGlzdCByZSB0 aGUgZnJhbWV3b3JrISksIGl0J3MgdGltZSB0bw0KPiBzdGFydCBjb25zaWRlcmluZyB3aGV0aGVy IHRoZSBzb2x1dGlvbnMgZHJhZnRzIHdlIGhhdmUgKHRoaXMgZHJhZnQgYW5kIHRoZQ0KPiBwYmIt ZXB2biBkcmFmdCkgYXJlIHRoZSByaWdodCBiYXNpcyBmb3Igb3VyIHNvbHV0aW9ucyBkb2NzLg0K Pg0KPiBQbGVhc2UgcmV2aWV3IHRoZSBkcmFmdCBhbmQgcmVzcG9uZCBieSBNb25kYXkgSmFudWFy eSAyM3JkIHdpdGggY29tbWVudHMgYXMNCj4gdG8gaXRzIHN1aXRhYmlsaXR5IGZvciBXRyBhZG9w dGlvbi4NCj4NCj4gR2lsZXMNCj4NCj4NCg== From nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com Tue Jan 10 04:07:40 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B892721F8606 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 04:07:40 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.226 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.226 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.373, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mWHSnHq+VWzh for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 04:07:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from fldsmtpe02.verizon.com (fldsmtpe02.verizon.com [140.108.26.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F57B21F85FC for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 04:07:39 -0800 (PST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: false Received: from unknown (HELO fldsmtpi02.verizon.com) ([166.68.71.144]) by fldsmtpe02.verizon.com with ESMTP; 10 Jan 2012 12:07:38 +0000 From: "Bitar, Nabil N" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,486,1320624000"; d="scan'208";a="203638725" Received: from fldp1lumxc7hb04.verizon.com (HELO FLDP1LUMXC7HB04.us.one.verizon.com) ([166.68.75.83]) by fldsmtpi02.verizon.com with ESMTP; 10 Jan 2012 12:07:38 +0000 Received: from fldp1lumxc7v63.us.one.verizon.com ([169.254.3.10]) by FLDP1LUMXC7HB04.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.75.83]) with mapi; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:07:37 -0500 To: "Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" , Giles Heron , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:07:37 -0500 Subject: Re: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-Topic: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-Index: AczPkHGqOQqIMA1mQiu7/xXngjvQQw== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <14C7F4F06DB5814AB0DE29716C4F6D671CD311C3@FRMRSSXCHMBSB1.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.14.0.111121 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:07:40 -0000 +1 as co-author On 1/9/12 2:11 PM, "Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" wrote: >Support as a co-author > >-----Original Message----- >From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of >Giles Heron >Sent: maandag 9 januari 2012 19:40 >To: l2vpn@ietf.org >Subject: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn > >This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: >=20 >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-04 > >should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. > >Now that we've accepted the requirements and framework drafts (I think >Nabil's about to send email to the list re the framework!), it's time to >start considering whether the solutions drafts we have (this draft and the >pbb-epvn draft) are the right basis for our solutions docs. > >Please review the draft and respond by Monday January 23rd with comments >as >to its suitability for WG adoption. > >Giles > > From nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com Tue Jan 10 04:19:09 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFEBA21F8691 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 04:19:09 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.474 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.474 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.628, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GblAWoQ8U7xa for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 04:19:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from fldsmtpe03.verizon.com (fldsmtpe03.verizon.com [140.108.26.142]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B4B421F8674 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 04:19:08 -0800 (PST) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: false Received: from unknown (HELO fldsmtpi03.verizon.com) ([166.68.71.145]) by fldsmtpe03.verizon.com with ESMTP; 10 Jan 2012 12:19:06 +0000 From: "Bitar, Nabil N" To: "Bitar, Nabil N" , "l2vpn@ietf.org" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,486,1320624000"; d="scan'208,217";a="203708152" Received: from fldp1lumxc7hb01.verizon.com (HELO FLDP1LUMXC7HB01.us.one.verizon.com) ([166.68.45.78]) by fldsmtpi03.verizon.com with ESMTP; 10 Jan 2012 12:19:06 +0000 Received: from fldp1lumxc7v63.us.one.verizon.com ([169.254.3.10]) by FLDP1LUMXC7HB01.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.45.78]) with mapi; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:19:06 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:19:06 -0500 Subject: [l1vpn] Support for adopting the draft "A Framework for E-Tree Service over MPLS Network" as an l2vpn WG document Thread-Topic: [l1vpn] Support for adopting the draft "A Framework for E-Tree Service over MPLS Network" as an l2vpn WG document Thread-Index: AczPkgwfJDlTW5GzTV6cgfqA+psRqw== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.14.0.111121 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CB3183F8370DBnabilnbitarverizoncom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Giles Heron X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:19:09 -0000 --_000_CB3183F8370DBnabilnbitarverizoncom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="euc-kr" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SGksDQpUaGUgcG9sbCBjbG9zZWQgb24gMS82LzIwMTIgYW5kIHJlc3BvbnNlcyBzaG93ZWQgZ29v ZCBzdXBwb3J0IHRvIGFkb3B0aW5nIHRoZSBkcmFmdCAgIkEgRnJhbWV3b3JrIGZvciBFLVRyZWUg U2VydmljZSBvdmVyIE1QTFMgTmV0d29yayIgYXMgYSBXRyBkb2N1bWVudC4NCkF1dGhvcnMgb2Yg dGhlIGRyYWZ0LCBwbGVhc2UgaXNzdWUgdGhlIGRyYWZ0IGFzIGFuIElFVEYgbDJ2cG4gd29ya2lu ZyBncm91cCBkcmFmdCAwMCBieSB0aGUgY3V0b2ZmIGRhdGUgZm9yIGluaXRpYWwgZHJhZnQgKDAw KSBzdWJtaXNzaW9uIGZvciB0aGUgSUVURiA4MyBtZWV0aW5nIGluIFBhcmlzLiBQbGVhc2UsIGNv bnNpZGVyIHRoZSBjb21tZW50IGZyb20gRGF2ZSBBbGxlbiByZWdhcmRpbmcgdGhlIGluZm9ybWF0 aXZlIHJlZmVyZW5jZS4NCg0KVGhhbmtzLA0KTmFiaWwNCg0KDQoNCkZyb206IE5hYmlsIEJpdGFy IDxuYWJpbC5uLmJpdGFyQHZlcml6b24uY29tPG1haWx0bzpuYWJpbC5uLmJpdGFyQHZlcml6b24u Y29tPj4NCkRhdGU6IEZyaSwgMTYgRGVjIDIwMTEgMDk6MTY6MDggLTA1MDANClRvOiAibDJ2cG5A aWV0Zi5vcmc8bWFpbHRvOmwydnBuQGlldGYub3JnPiIgPGwydnBuQGlldGYub3JnPG1haWx0bzps MnZwbkBpZXRmLm9yZz4+DQpDYzogR2lsZXMgSGVyb24gPGdpaGVyb25AY2lzY28uY29tPG1haWx0 bzpnaWhlcm9uQGNpc2NvLmNvbT4+DQpTdWJqZWN0OiBbbDJ2cG5dIFdHIFBvbGwgZm9yIGFkb3B0 aW5nIHRoZSBkcmFmdCCp+EEgRnJhbWV3b3JrIGZvciBFLVRyZWUgU2VydmljZSBvdmVyIE1QTFMg TmV0d29ya6n3IGFzIGEgV0cgZG9jdW1lbnQNCg0KSGksDQoNClRoaXMgaXMgdGhlIHN0YXJ0IG9m IGEgdGhyZWUtd2VlayB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwIHBvbGwgZm9yIGFkb3B0aW5nIHRoZSBkcmFmdCCh sEEgRnJhbWV3b3JrIGZvciBFLVRyZWUgU2VydmljZSBvdmVyIE1QTFMgTmV0d29ya6GxIGFzIGFu IEwyVlBOIFdHIGRvY3VtZW50Lg0KDQpUaGUgZHJhZnQgY2FuIGJlIGZvdW5kIGF0IGh0dHA6Ly90 b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0LWtleS1sMnZwbi1ldHJlZS1mcndrLTA2IC4NCg0KUGxl YXNlLCByZXZpZXcgdGhlIGRyYWZ0IGFuZCBzZW5kIGFueSBjb21tZW50cyB0byB0aGUgTDJWUE4g d29ya2luZyBncm91cCBlbWFpbCBsaXN0Lg0KDQpUaGlzIFdHIHBvbGwgd2lsbCBjbG9zZSBvbiBG cmlkYXkgSmFudWFyeSA2LCAyMDEyLg0KDQpSZWdhcmRzLA0KTmFiaWwNCg== --_000_CB3183F8370DBnabilnbitarverizoncom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="euc-kr" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWw+PGhlYWQ+PC9oZWFkPjxib2R5IHN0eWxlPSJ3b3JkLXdyYXA6IGJyZWFrLXdvcmQ7IC13 ZWJraXQtbmJzcC1tb2RlOiBzcGFjZTsgLXdlYmtpdC1saW5lLWJyZWFrOiBhZnRlci13aGl0ZS1z cGFjZTsgY29sb3I6IHJnYigwLCAwLCAwKTsgZm9udC1zaXplOiAxNHB4OyBmb250LWZhbWlseTog Q2FsaWJyaSwgc2Fucy1zZXJpZjsgIj48ZGl2PkhpLDwvZGl2PjxkaXY+VGhlIHBvbGwgY2xvc2Vk IG9uIDEvNi8yMDEyIGFuZCByZXNwb25zZXMgc2hvd2VkIGdvb2Qgc3VwcG9ydCB0byBhZG9wdGlu ZyB0aGUgZHJhZnQmbmJzcDsmbmJzcDsiQSBGcmFtZXdvcmsgZm9yIEUtVHJlZSBTZXJ2aWNlIG92 ZXIgTVBMUyBOZXR3b3JrIiBhcyBhIFdHIGRvY3VtZW50LiZuYnNwOzwvZGl2PjxkaXY+QXV0aG9y cyBvZiB0aGUgZHJhZnQsIHBsZWFzZSBpc3N1ZSB0aGUgZHJhZnQgYXMgYW4gSUVURiBsMnZwbiB3 b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwIGRyYWZ0IDAwIGJ5IHRoZSBjdXRvZmYgZGF0ZSBmb3IgaW5pdGlhbCBkcmFm dCAoMDApIHN1Ym1pc3Npb24gZm9yIHRoZSBJRVRGIDgzIG1lZXRpbmcgaW4gUGFyaXMuIFBsZWFz ZSwgY29uc2lkZXIgdGhlIGNvbW1lbnQgZnJvbSBEYXZlIEFsbGVuIHJlZ2FyZGluZyB0aGUgaW5m b3JtYXRpdmUgcmVmZXJlbmNlLjwvZGl2PjxkaXY+PGJyPjwvZGl2PjxkaXY+VGhhbmtzLDwvZGl2 PjxkaXY+TmFiaWw8L2Rpdj48ZGl2Pjxicj48L2Rpdj48ZGl2Pjxicj48L2Rpdj48ZGl2Pjxicj48 L2Rpdj48c3BhbiBpZD0iT0xLX1NSQ19CT0RZX1NFQ1RJT04iPjxkaXYgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtZmFt aWx5OkNhbGlicmk7IGZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMXB0OyB0ZXh0LWFsaWduOmxlZnQ7IGNvbG9yOmJsYWNr OyBCT1JERVItQk9UVE9NOiBtZWRpdW0gbm9uZTsgQk9SREVSLUxFRlQ6IG1lZGl1bSBub25lOyBQ QURESU5HLUJPVFRPTTogMGluOyBQQURESU5HLUxFRlQ6IDBpbjsgUEFERElORy1SSUdIVDogMGlu OyBCT1JERVItVE9QOiAjYjVjNGRmIDFwdCBzb2xpZDsgQk9SREVSLVJJR0hUOiBtZWRpdW0gbm9u ZTsgUEFERElORy1UT1A6IDNwdCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0OmJvbGQiPkZyb206 IDwvc3Bhbj4gTmFiaWwgQml0YXIgJmx0OzxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzpuYWJpbC5uLmJpdGFyQHZl cml6b24uY29tIj5uYWJpbC5uLmJpdGFyQHZlcml6b24uY29tPC9hPiZndDs8YnI+PHNwYW4gc3R5 bGU9ImZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0OmJvbGQiPkRhdGU6IDwvc3Bhbj4gRnJpLCAxNiBEZWMgMjAxMSAwOTox NjowOCAtMDUwMDxicj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC13ZWlnaHQ6Ym9sZCI+VG86IDwvc3Bhbj4g IjxhIGhyZWY9Im1haWx0bzpsMnZwbkBpZXRmLm9yZyI+bDJ2cG5AaWV0Zi5vcmc8L2E+IiAmbHQ7 PGEgaHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOmwydnBuQGlldGYub3JnIj5sMnZwbkBpZXRmLm9yZzwvYT4mZ3Q7PGJy PjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXdlaWdodDpib2xkIj5DYzogPC9zcGFuPiBHaWxlcyBIZXJvbiAm bHQ7PGEgaHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOmdpaGVyb25AY2lzY28uY29tIj5naWhlcm9uQGNpc2NvLmNvbTwv YT4mZ3Q7PGJyPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXdlaWdodDpib2xkIj5TdWJqZWN0OiA8L3NwYW4+ IFtsMnZwbl0gV0cgUG9sbCBmb3IgYWRvcHRpbmcgdGhlIGRyYWZ0IKn4QSBGcmFtZXdvcmsgZm9y IEUtVHJlZSBTZXJ2aWNlIG92ZXIgTVBMUyBOZXR3b3JrqfcgYXMgYSBXRyBkb2N1bWVudDxicj48 L2Rpdj48ZGl2Pjxicj48L2Rpdj48ZGl2PjxtZXRhIGh0dHAtZXF1aXY9IkNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZSIg Y29udGVudD0idGV4dC9odG1sOyBjaGFyc2V0PVdpbmRvd3MtMTI1MiI+PGRpdiBzdHlsZT0id29y ZC13cmFwOiBicmVhay13b3JkOyAtd2Via2l0LW5ic3AtbW9kZTogc3BhY2U7IC13ZWJraXQtbGlu ZS1icmVhazogYWZ0ZXItd2hpdGUtc3BhY2U7IGNvbG9yOiByZ2IoMCwgMCwgMCk7IGZvbnQtc2l6 ZTogMTRweDsgZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IENhbGlicmksIHNhbnMtc2VyaWY7ICI+PGRpdiBzdHlsZT0i Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IENhbGlicmksIHNhbnMtc2VyaWY7IGZvbnQtc2l6ZTogMTRweDsgIj48c3Bh biBjbGFzcz0iQXBwbGUtc3R5bGUtc3BhbiIgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZTogMTZweDsgZm9udC1m YW1pbHk6ICdUaW1lcyBOZXcgUm9tYW4nOyAiPkhpLDwvc3Bhbj48L2Rpdj48ZGl2IHN0eWxlPSJm b250LWZhbWlseTogQ2FsaWJyaSwgc2Fucy1zZXJpZjsgZm9udC1zaXplOiAxNHB4OyAiPjxzcGFu IGNsYXNzPSJBcHBsZS1zdHlsZS1zcGFuIiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOiAxNnB4OyBmb250LWZh bWlseTogJ1RpbWVzIE5ldyBSb21hbic7ICI+PGJyPjwvc3Bhbj48L2Rpdj48ZGl2IHN0eWxlPSJm b250LWZhbWlseTogQ2FsaWJyaSwgc2Fucy1zZXJpZjsgIj48c3BhbiBjbGFzcz0iQXBwbGUtc3R5 bGUtc3BhbiIgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZTogMTZweDsiPjxzcGFuIGNsYXNzPSJBcHBsZS1zdHls ZS1zcGFuIiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6ICdUaW1lcyBOZXcgUm9tYW4nOyAiPlRoaXMgaXMg dGhlIHN0YXJ0IG9mIGEgdGhyZWUtd2VlayB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwIHBvbGwgZm9yIGFkb3B0aW5n IHRoZSBkcmFmdCAmIzgyMjA7PC9zcGFuPjxzcGFuIGNsYXNzPSJBcHBsZS1zdHlsZS1zcGFuIiBz dHlsZT0id2hpdGUtc3BhY2U6IHByZTsgZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6ICdUaW1lcyBOZXcgUm9tYW4nOyAi PkEgRnJhbWV3b3JrIGZvciBFLVRyZWUgU2VydmljZSBvdmVyIE1QTFMgTmV0d29yazwvc3Bhbj48 L3NwYW4+PHNwYW4gY2xhc3M9IkFwcGxlLXN0eWxlLXNwYW4iIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6IDE2 cHg7ICI+PHNwYW4gY2xhc3M9IkFwcGxlLXN0eWxlLXNwYW4iIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LWZhbWlseTog J1RpbWVzIE5ldyBSb21hbic7ICI+JiM4MjIxOyBhcyBhbiBMMlZQTiBXRyBkb2N1bWVudC48L3Nw YW4+PHNwYW4gY2xhc3M9IkFwcGxlLXN0eWxlLXNwYW4iIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LWZhbWlseTogJ1Rp bWVzIE5ldyBSb21hbic7ICI+Jm5ic3A7PC9zcGFuPjwvc3Bhbj48L2Rpdj48ZGl2PjxzcGFuIGNs YXNzPSJBcHBsZS1zdHlsZS1zcGFuIiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOiAxNnB4OyBmb250LWZhbWls eTogJ1RpbWVzIE5ldyBSb21hbic7ICI+PGJyPjwvc3Bhbj48L2Rpdj48ZGl2PjxzcGFuIGNsYXNz PSJBcHBsZS1zdHlsZS1zcGFuIiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOiAxNnB4OyBmb250LWZhbWlseTog J1RpbWVzIE5ldyBSb21hbic7ICI+VGhlIGRyYWZ0IGNhbiBiZSBmb3VuZCBhdDwvc3Bhbj48c3Bh biBjbGFzcz0iQXBwbGUtc3R5bGUtc3BhbiIgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZTogMTZweDsgZm9udC1m YW1pbHk6ICdUaW1lcyBOZXcgUm9tYW4nOyAiPiZuYnNwOzwvc3Bhbj48c3BhbiBjbGFzcz0iQXBw bGUtc3R5bGUtc3BhbiIgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZTogMTZweDsgZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6ICdUaW1l cyBOZXcgUm9tYW4nOyAiPjxhIGhyZWY9Imh0dHA6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0 LWtleS1sMnZwbi1ldHJlZS1mcndrLTA2Ij5odHRwOi8vdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmcvaHRtbC9kcmFm dC1rZXktbDJ2cG4tZXRyZWUtZnJ3ay0wNjwvYT4mbmJzcDs8L3NwYW4+PHNwYW4gY2xhc3M9IkFw cGxlLXN0eWxlLXNwYW4iIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6IDE2cHg7IGZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiAnVGlt ZXMgTmV3IFJvbWFuJzsgIj4uPC9zcGFuPjxzcGFuIGNsYXNzPSJBcHBsZS1zdHlsZS1zcGFuIiBz dHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOiAxNnB4OyBmb250LWZhbWlseTogJ1RpbWVzIE5ldyBSb21hbic7ICI+ PGJyPjwvc3Bhbj48c3BhbiBjbGFzcz0iQXBwbGUtc3R5bGUtc3BhbiIgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6 ZTogMTZweDsgZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6ICdUaW1lcyBOZXcgUm9tYW4nOyAiPiZuYnNwOzwvc3Bhbj48 c3BhbiBjbGFzcz0iQXBwbGUtc3R5bGUtc3BhbiIgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZTogMTZweDsgZm9u dC1mYW1pbHk6ICdUaW1lcyBOZXcgUm9tYW4nOyAiPjxicj48L3NwYW4+PHNwYW4gY2xhc3M9IkFw cGxlLXN0eWxlLXNwYW4iIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6IDE2cHg7IGZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiAnVGlt ZXMgTmV3IFJvbWFuJzsgIj5QbGVhc2UsIHJldmlldyB0aGUgZHJhZnQgYW5kIHNlbmQgYW55IGNv bW1lbnRzIHRvIHRoZSBMMlZQTiB3b3JraW5nIGdyb3VwIGVtYWlsIGxpc3QuPC9zcGFuPjxzcGFu IGNsYXNzPSJBcHBsZS1zdHlsZS1zcGFuIiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOiAxNnB4OyBmb250LWZh bWlseTogJ1RpbWVzIE5ldyBSb21hbic7ICI+Jm5ic3A7PC9zcGFuPjxzcGFuIGNsYXNzPSJBcHBs ZS1zdHlsZS1zcGFuIiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOiAxNnB4OyBmb250LWZhbWlseTogJ1RpbWVz IE5ldyBSb21hbic7ICI+PGJyPjwvc3Bhbj48c3BhbiBjbGFzcz0iQXBwbGUtc3R5bGUtc3BhbiIg c3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZTogMTZweDsgZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6ICdUaW1lcyBOZXcgUm9tYW4nOyAi Pjxicj48L3NwYW4+PHNwYW4gY2xhc3M9IkFwcGxlLXN0eWxlLXNwYW4iIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNp emU6IDE2cHg7IGZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiAnVGltZXMgTmV3IFJvbWFuJzsgIj5UaGlzIFdHIHBvbGwg d2lsbCBjbG9zZSBvbiBGcmlkYXkgSmFudWFyeSA2LCAyMDEyLjwvc3Bhbj48c3BhbiBjbGFzcz0i QXBwbGUtc3R5bGUtc3BhbiIgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZTogMTZweDsgZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6ICdU aW1lcyBOZXcgUm9tYW4nOyAiPjxicj48L3NwYW4+PHNwYW4gY2xhc3M9IkFwcGxlLXN0eWxlLXNw YW4iIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6IDE2cHg7IGZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiAnVGltZXMgTmV3IFJvbWFu JzsgIj4mbmJzcDs8L3NwYW4+PHNwYW4gY2xhc3M9IkFwcGxlLXN0eWxlLXNwYW4iIHN0eWxlPSJm b250LXNpemU6IDE2cHg7IGZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiAnVGltZXMgTmV3IFJvbWFuJzsgIj48YnI+PC9z cGFuPjxzcGFuIGNsYXNzPSJBcHBsZS1zdHlsZS1zcGFuIiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOiAxNnB4 OyBmb250LWZhbWlseTogJ1RpbWVzIE5ldyBSb21hbic7ICI+UmVnYXJkcyw8L3NwYW4+PHNwYW4g Y2xhc3M9IkFwcGxlLXN0eWxlLXNwYW4iIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6IDE2cHg7IGZvbnQtZmFt aWx5OiAnVGltZXMgTmV3IFJvbWFuJzsgIj48YnI+PC9zcGFuPjxzcGFuIGNsYXNzPSJBcHBsZS1z dHlsZS1zcGFuIiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOiAxNnB4OyBmb250LWZhbWlseTogJ1RpbWVzIE5l dyBSb21hbic7ICI+TmFiaWw8L3NwYW4+PHNwYW4gY2xhc3M9IkFwcGxlLXN0eWxlLXNwYW4iIHN0 eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6IDE2cHg7IGZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiAnVGltZXMgTmV3IFJvbWFuJzsgIj4m bmJzcDs8L3NwYW4+PC9kaXY+PC9kaXY+PC9kaXY+PC9zcGFuPjwvYm9keT48L2h0bWw+DQo= --_000_CB3183F8370DBnabilnbitarverizoncom_-- From N.Leymann@telekom.de Tue Jan 10 06:55:56 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A86021F8734 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:55:56 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.249 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PPWu1MaNoyvn for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:55:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from tcmail33.telekom.de (tcmail33.telekom.de [194.25.30.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F6221F8737 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:55:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from he101250.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.125.92.153]) by tcmail31.telekom.de with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 10 Jan 2012 15:55:53 +0100 Received: from HE111543.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([169.254.4.242]) by HE101250.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([fe80::e439:4046:12e2:e37%15]) with mapi; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:55:53 +0100 From: To: , Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:55:52 +0100 Subject: AW: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-Topic: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-Index: AcyQBRR+BnU8yNibqEe6U5jsOUZ2Xw++PmW4ACp01EA= Message-ID: <9762ACF04FA26B4388476841256BDE020115AA3200BC@HE111543.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: de-DE Content-Language: de-DE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: de-DE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:55:56 -0000 Support. Regards Nic -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- Von: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von = Giles Heron Gesendet: Montag, 9. Januar 2012 19:40 An: l2vpn@ietf.org Betreff: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-04 should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. Now that we've accepted the requirements and framework drafts (I think Nabil's about to send email to the list re the framework!), it's time to start considering whether the solutions drafts we have (this draft and the pbb-epvn draft) are the right basis for our solutions docs. Please review the draft and respond by Monday January 23rd with comments as to its suitability for WG adoption. Giles From giles.heron@gmail.com Tue Jan 10 06:57:45 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F30921F8747 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:57:45 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vI5UXd9bBXXy for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:57:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com (mail-we0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE18F21F873E for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:57:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by werb14 with SMTP id b14so4343690wer.31 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:57:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5oh13Xkc7xZBmvGcFnLxW4yImiq1QhdE7+IRP1GNzTs=; b=CIJxyldlkDxepUMU+TA6Pono303MiR+YqCszu1tnaNRhnlVlE5Z+1/vkSJBlo8kGv/ 5EIvPMcgySBkGnnfGfK8o1U0ezGudCLTm6lQsNqxfWPkdoh7eemRJme3oFLcjc8OKzoR 4UlBn4V4LmsZNNqMplJoVT1UPj/FYW7xCtF4A= Received: by 10.216.132.19 with SMTP id n19mr954992wei.31.1326207463888; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:57:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.147.56.83] (64-103-25-233.cisco.com. [64.103.25.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q7sm1662388wix.5.2012.01.10.06.57.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:57:36 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.32.0.111121 Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:57:36 +0000 Subject: VPMS Framework & Requirements From: Giles Heron To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: VPMS Framework & Requirements Thread-Index: AczPqDBgYyqc6Jaur0mKq8DOc4E1EQ== Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:57:45 -0000 Hi everyone, At IETF82 in Taipei we polled the room to ask if there was any interest by non-authors in the VPMS Framework & Requirements draft: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpms-frmwk-requirements-04 There were no hands raised in the room, and hence we decided to poll the working group list to see if there's any interest. So would people please respond within the next two weeks (i.e. by Tuesday January 24th) if they have interest in seeing this draft progressed to RFC. Responses by non-authors, and by carriers, would be especially welcome. If there is sufficient interest in seeing this draft progress we will attempt to arrange for expert review of the draft before progressing it to RFC. Nabil & Giles From raymond.key@hotmail.com Tue Jan 10 07:02:17 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D77D521F8770 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:02:17 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.998 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_65=0.6, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Omk1A8bN+-1K for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:02:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from snt0-omc2-s46.snt0.hotmail.com (snt0-omc2-s46.snt0.hotmail.com [65.54.61.97]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 387C921F8771 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:02:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from SNT123-W5 ([65.55.90.73]) by snt0-omc2-s46.snt0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:02:16 -0800 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_028f40ce-97ba-49ef-a8f7-9f66c8efa5bc_" X-Originating-IP: [113.92.40.190] From: Raymond Key Sender: To: , Subject: RE: [l2vpn] Support for adopting the draft "A Framework for E-Tree Service over MPLS Network" as an l2vpn WG document Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 02:02:16 +1100 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: References: , MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Jan 2012 15:02:16.0632 (UTC) FILETIME=[D7A5BB80:01CCCFA8] Cc: giheron@cisco.com X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:02:18 -0000 --_028f40ce-97ba-49ef-a8f7-9f66c8efa5bc_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks a lot for your support=2C will submit working group draft accordingl= y.Raymond KeyFrom: nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com To: nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com=3B l2vpn@ietf.org Date: Tue=2C 10 Jan 2012 07:19:06 -0500 Subject: [l2vpn] Support for adopting the draft "A Framework for E-Tree Ser= vice over MPLS Network" as an l2vpn WG document CC: giheron@cisco.com Hi=2CThe poll closed on 1/6/2012 and responses showed good support to adopt= ing the draft "A Framework for E-Tree Service over MPLS Network" as a WG d= ocument. Authors of the draft=2C please issue the draft as an IETF l2vpn wo= rking group draft 00 by the cutoff date for initial draft (00) submission f= or the IETF 83 meeting in Paris. Please=2C consider the comment from Dave A= llen regarding the informative reference. Thanks=2CNabil From: Nabil Bitar Date: Fri=2C 16 Dec 2011 09:16:08 -0500 To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" Cc: Giles Heron Subject: [l2vpn] WG Poll for adopting the draft =B3A Framework for E-Tree = Service over MPLS Network=B2 as a WG document Hi=2C This is the start of a three-week working group poll for adopting the draft= =93A Framework for E-Tree Service over MPLS Network=94 as an L2VPN WG docu= ment.=20 The draft can be found at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-key-l2vpn-etree-= frwk-06 . =20 Please=2C review the draft and send any comments to the L2VPN working group= email list.=20 This WG poll will close on Friday January 6=2C 2012. =20 Regards=2C Nabil = --_028f40ce-97ba-49ef-a8f7-9f66c8efa5bc_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks a lot =3Bfor =3Byour support=2C will submit working grou= p draft accordingly.
Raymond Key
From: nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com
To: nabil= .n.bitar@verizon.com=3B l2vpn@ietf.org
Date: Tue=2C 10 Jan 2012 07:19:06= -0500
Subject: [l2vpn] Support for adopting the draft "A Framework for = E-Tree Service over MPLS Network" as an l2vpn WG document
CC: giheron@ci= sco.com

Hi=2C
The poll closed on 1/6/2012 and responses showed good support to adopting= the draft =3B =3B"A Framework for E-Tree Service over MPLS Network= " as a WG document. =3B
Authors of the draft=2C please issue = the draft as an IETF l2vpn working group draft 00 by the cutoff date for in= itial draft (00) submission for the IETF 83 meeting in Paris. Please=2C con= sider the comment from Dave Allen regarding the informative reference.

Thanks=2C
Nabil


From: Nabil Bitar &= lt=3Bnabil.n.bitar@verizon.com= >=3B
Date: Fri=2C 16 = Dec 2011 09:16:08 -0500
To: = "l2vpn@ietf.org" <=3Bl2vpn@ietf.org>=3B
Cc: Giles Heron <=3Bgiheron@cisco.com>=3B
Subj= ect: [l2vpn] WG Poll for adopting the draft =B3A Framework for E-Tr= ee Service over MPLS Network=B2 as a WG document

Hi= =2C

This is the start of a three-week working group = poll for adopting the draft =93A Framework = for E-Tree Service over MPLS Network=94 as an L2VPN WG document. =3B

The draft can be found at =3Bhttp:= //tools.ietf.org/html/draft-key-l2vpn-etree-frwk-06 =3B.
 =3B
Please=2C review the draft and send any comments to the L2VPN= working group email list. =3B

This WG poll will close on Friday January 6=2C 2012.=
 =3B=
Regards=2C
Nabil =3B
= = --_028f40ce-97ba-49ef-a8f7-9f66c8efa5bc_-- From raymond.key@hotmail.com Tue Jan 10 07:04:16 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1461621F8764 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:04:16 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.998 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_65=0.6, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OR5ykQ8MfTSU for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:04:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from snt0-omc2-s49.snt0.hotmail.com (snt0-omc2-s49.snt0.hotmail.com [65.54.61.100]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 661F121F8763 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:03:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from SNT123-W58 ([65.55.90.71]) by snt0-omc2-s49.snt0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:03:53 -0800 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_ce99da23-1674-4806-8a38-a711ce9657f0_" X-Originating-IP: [113.92.40.190] From: Raymond Key Sender: To: , Subject: RE: [l1vpn] Support for adopting the draft "A Framework for E-Tree Service over MPLS Network" as an l2vpn WG document Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 02:03:53 +1100 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: References: , MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Jan 2012 15:03:53.0808 (UTC) FILETIME=[11919D00:01CCCFA9] Cc: giheron@cisco.com X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:04:16 -0000 --_ce99da23-1674-4806-8a38-a711ce9657f0_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks a lot for your support=2C will submit working group draft accordingl= y.Raymond Key From: nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com To: nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com=3B l2vpn@ietf.org Date: Tue=2C 10 Jan 2012 07:19:06 -0500 Subject: [l1vpn] Support for adopting the draft "A Framework for E-Tree Ser= vice over MPLS Network" as an l2vpn WG document CC: giheron@cisco.com Hi=2CThe poll closed on 1/6/2012 and responses showed good support to adopt= ing the draft "A Framework for E-Tree Service over MPLS Network" as a WG d= ocument. Authors of the draft=2C please issue the draft as an IETF l2vpn wo= rking group draft 00 by the cutoff date for initial draft (00) submission f= or the IETF 83 meeting in Paris. Please=2C consider the comment from Dave A= llen regarding the informative reference. Thanks=2CNabil From: Nabil Bitar Date: Fri=2C 16 Dec 2011 09:16:08 -0500 To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" Cc: Giles Heron Subject: [l2vpn] WG Poll for adopting the draft =B3A Framework for E-Tree = Service over MPLS Network=B2 as a WG document Hi=2C This is the start of a three-week working group poll for adopting the draft= =93A Framework for E-Tree Service over MPLS Network=94 as an L2VPN WG docu= ment.=20 The draft can be found at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-key-l2vpn-etree-= frwk-06 . =20 Please=2C review the draft and send any comments to the L2VPN working group= email list.=20 This WG poll will close on Friday January 6=2C 2012. =20 Regards=2C Nabil = --_ce99da23-1674-4806-8a38-a711ce9657f0_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks a lot for your support=2C will submit working group draft accordingl= y.
Raymond Key

From: nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com
To: nabil.n.bitar@veri= zon.com=3B l2vpn@ietf.org
Date: Tue=2C 10 Jan 2012 07:19:06 -0500
Sub= ject: [l1vpn] Support for adopting the draft "A Framework for E-Tree Servic= e over MPLS Network" as an l2vpn WG document
CC: giheron@cisco.com
Hi=2C
The poll closed on 1/6/2012 and responses showed good support to adopting= the draft =3B =3B"A Framework for E-Tree Service over MPLS Network= " as a WG document. =3B
Authors of the draft=2C please issue = the draft as an IETF l2vpn working group draft 00 by the cutoff date for in= itial draft (00) submission for the IETF 83 meeting in Paris. Please=2C con= sider the comment from Dave Allen regarding the informative reference.

Thanks=2C
Nabil


From: Nabil Bitar &= lt=3Bnabil.n.bitar@verizon.com= >=3B
Date: Fri=2C 16 = Dec 2011 09:16:08 -0500
To: = "l2vpn@ietf.org" <=3Bl2vpn@ietf.org>=3B
Cc: Giles Heron <=3Bgiheron@cisco.com>=3B
Subj= ect: [l2vpn] WG Poll for adopting the draft =B3A Framework for E-Tr= ee Service over MPLS Network=B2 as a WG document

Hi= =2C

This is the start of a three-week working group = poll for adopting the draft =93A Framework = for E-Tree Service over MPLS Network=94 as an L2VPN WG document. =3B

The draft can be found at =3Bhttp:= //tools.ietf.org/html/draft-key-l2vpn-etree-frwk-06 =3B.
 =3B
Please=2C review the draft and send any comments to the L2VPN= working group email list. =3B

This WG poll will close on Friday January 6=2C 2012.=
 =3B=
Regards=2C
Nabil =3B
= = --_ce99da23-1674-4806-8a38-a711ce9657f0_-- From ju1738@att.com Tue Jan 10 07:23:35 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C2E121F85E4 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:23:34 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iT87F9Rg80oI for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:23:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail119.messagelabs.com (mail119.messagelabs.com [216.82.241.195]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CE9321F85A0 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:23:27 -0800 (PST) X-Env-Sender: ju1738@att.com X-Msg-Ref: server-10.tower-119.messagelabs.com!1326209004!9820197!1 X-Originating-IP: [144.160.20.145] X-StarScan-Version: 6.4.3; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 13870 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2012 15:23:25 -0000 Received: from sbcsmtp6.sbc.com (HELO mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com) (144.160.20.145) by server-10.tower-119.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 10 Jan 2012 15:23:25 -0000 Received: from enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0AFNqk2020927; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:23:54 -0500 Received: from sflint02.pst.cso.att.com (sflint02.pst.cso.att.com [144.154.234.229]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q0AFNpd7020907 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:23:51 -0500 Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUB9B.ITServices.sbc.com (misout7msghub9b.itservices.sbc.com [144.151.223.72]) by sflint02.pst.cso.att.com (RSA Interceptor); Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:23:10 -0500 Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSR9I.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.1.231]) by MISOUT7MSGHUB9B.ITServices.sbc.com ([144.151.223.72]) with mapi id 14.01.0339.001; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:23:10 -0500 From: "UTTARO, JAMES" To: "'Ali Sajassi (sajassi)'" , Giles Heron , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: RE: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-Topic: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-Index: AQHMzv4ZGi2Am6V9YUiBtl8YdS1T+ZYE2U6AgADgMGA= Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:23:09 +0000 Message-ID: References: <7F115A41909B2641A9550322C4DF9D5608A69C2B@xmb-sjc-22d.amer.cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <7F115A41909B2641A9550322C4DF9D5608A69C2B@xmb-sjc-22d.amer.cisco.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.70.62.173] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-RSA-Inspected: yes X-RSA-Classifications: public X-RSA-Action: allow X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:23:35 -0000 Support.. Jim Uttaro -----Original Message----- From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of A= li Sajassi (sajassi) Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 4:01 PM To: Giles Heron; l2vpn@ietf.org Subject: RE: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Support as co-editor. -Ali > -----Original Message----- > From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of Giles Heron > Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 10:40 AM > To: l2vpn@ietf.org > Subject: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn >=20 > This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: >=20 > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-04 >=20 > should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. >=20 > Now that we've accepted the requirements and framework drafts (I think > Nabil's about to send email to the list re the framework!), it's time > to > start considering whether the solutions drafts we have (this draft and > the > pbb-epvn draft) are the right basis for our solutions docs. >=20 > Please review the draft and respond by Monday January 23rd with > comments as > to its suitability for WG adoption. >=20 > Giles >=20 From roberto.fragassi@alcatel-lucent.com Tue Jan 10 07:32:15 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB29F21F8598 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:32:15 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rr4R9dlQ8Obb for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:32:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from ihemail2.lucent.com (ihemail2.lucent.com [135.245.0.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4508821F858B for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:32:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from usnavsmail1.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsmail1.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.9]) by ihemail2.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id q0AFWEPe021960 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:32:14 -0600 (CST) Received: from USNAVSXCHHUB03.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsxchhub03.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.112]) by usnavsmail1.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id q0AFW2x6013988 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:32:14 -0600 Received: from USNAVSXCHMBSC2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.3.39.147]) by USNAVSXCHHUB03.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.3.39.112]) with mapi; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:32:10 -0600 From: "Fragassi, Roberto (Roberto)" To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:32:09 -0600 Subject: RE: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-Topic: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-Index: AcyQBRR+BnU8yNibqEe6U5jsOUZ2Xw++PmW4ACu79fA= Message-ID: <73F3CA62A57C6148B6ECEB8DB8E40A290AD6B7C29D@USNAVSXCHMBSC2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.35 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 135.3.39.9 X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:32:15 -0000 Support -----Original Message----- From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of G= iles Heron Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 1:40 PM To: l2vpn@ietf.org Subject: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: =20 http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-04 should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. Now that we've accepted the requirements and framework drafts (I think Nabil's about to send email to the list re the framework!), it's time to start considering whether the solutions drafts we have (this draft and the pbb-epvn draft) are the right basis for our solutions docs. Please review the draft and respond by Monday January 23rd with comments as to its suitability for WG adoption. Giles From linda.dunbar@huawei.com Tue Jan 10 07:45:34 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4953E21F8723 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:45:34 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.581 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.581 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.018, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0xu1hDFpruox for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:45:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DE7F21F871C for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:45:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfweml201-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.2.3-GA FastPath) with ESMTP id ACF99572; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:45:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from DFWEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.151) by dfweml201-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.107) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:42:27 -0800 Received: from DFWEML505-MBX.china.huawei.com ([10.124.31.100]) by dfweml403-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.151]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 07:42:20 -0800 From: Linda Dunbar To: "giles.heron@gmail.com" , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: RE: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-Topic: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-Index: AcyQBRR+BnU8yNibqEe6U5jsOUZ2Xw++PmW4ACp01EAAAaAlsA== Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:42:19 +0000 Message-ID: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F62A4E70EF@dfweml505-mbx> References: <9762ACF04FA26B4388476841256BDE020115AA3200BC@HE111543.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> In-Reply-To: <9762ACF04FA26B4388476841256BDE020115AA3200BC@HE111543.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.47.134.174] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:45:34 -0000 Support.=20 Linda Dunbar >=20 > -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- > Von: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] Im Auftrag > von Giles Heron > Gesendet: Montag, 9. Januar 2012 19:40 > An: l2vpn@ietf.org > Betreff: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn >=20 > This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: >=20 > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-04 >=20 > should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. >=20 > Now that we've accepted the requirements and framework drafts (I think > Nabil's about to send email to the list re the framework!), it's time > to > start considering whether the solutions drafts we have (this draft and > the > pbb-epvn draft) are the right basis for our solutions docs. >=20 > Please review the draft and respond by Monday January 23rd with > comments as > to its suitability for WG adoption. >=20 > Giles >=20 From lizhong.jin@zte.com.cn Tue Jan 10 16:44:36 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF6AD21F85EF for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:44:36 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.054 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.054 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.784, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_LOOSE=0.76, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HFfPu92nnWhF for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:44:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx5.zte.com.cn (mx6.zte.com.cn [95.130.199.165]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2BAE21F8606 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:44:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.30.17.100] by mx5.zte.com.cn with surfront esmtp id 56690577109098; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 08:22:49 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.30.3.21] by [192.168.168.16] with StormMail ESMTP id 56968.683968793; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 08:44:16 +0800 (CST) Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse02.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id q0B0iGhg077758; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 08:44:16 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from lizhong.jin@zte.com.cn) In-Reply-To: To: giles.heron@gmail.com Subject: Re: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.4 March 27, 2005 Message-ID: From: Lizhong Jin Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 08:44:04 +0800 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 2012-01-11 08:44:17, Serialize complete at 2012-01-11 08:44:17 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 00040CCD48257982_=" X-MAIL: mse02.zte.com.cn q0B0iGhg077758 Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:44:36 -0000 This is a multipart message in MIME format. --=_alternative 00040CCD48257982_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Yes, support. Lizhong > ------------------------------ > > Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:39:44 +0000 > From: Giles Heron > To: > Subject: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" > > This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-04 > > should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. > > Now that we've accepted the requirements and framework drafts (I think > Nabil's about to send email to the list re the framework!), it's time to > start considering whether the solutions drafts we have (this draft and the > pbb-epvn draft) are the right basis for our solutions docs. > > Please review the draft and respond by Monday January 23rd with comments as > to its suitability for WG adoption. > > Giles > > > > > ------------------------------ > -------------------------------------------------------- ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail is solely property of the sender's organization. This mail communication is confidential. Recipients named above are obligated to maintain secrecy and are not permitted to disclose the contents of this communication to others. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender. This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE Anti-Spam system. --=_alternative 00040CCD48257982_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Yes, support.

Lizhong


> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:39:44 +0000
> From: Giles Heron <giles.heron@gmail.com>
> To: <l2vpn@ietf.org>
> Subject: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn
> Message-ID: <CB30E4F0.142E5%giles.heron@gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;   charset="US-ASCII"
>
> This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether:
>  
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-04
>
> should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft.
>
> Now that we've accepted the requirements and framework drafts (I think
> Nabil's about to send email to the list re the framework!), it's time to
> start considering whether the solutions drafts we have (this draft and the
> pbb-epvn draft) are the right basis for our solutions docs.
>
> Please review the draft and respond by Monday January 23rd with comments as
> to its suitability for WG adoption.
>
> Giles
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> 
--------------------------------------------------------
ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail is solely property of the sender's organization. This mail communication is confidential. Recipients named above are obligated to maintain secrecy and are not permitted to disclose the contents of this communication to others.
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender.
This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE Anti-Spam system.
--=_alternative 00040CCD48257982_=-- From ogaki@kddilabs.jp Wed Jan 11 00:53:35 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE9321F8799 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:53:35 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id biYI5CwWSU5b for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:53:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from mandala.kddilabs.jp (mandala.kddilabs.jp [IPv6:2001:200:601:12::16]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EAA421F8783 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:53:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (mandala.kddilabs.jp [127.0.0.1]) by mandala.kddilabs.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79AC2174815E for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:52:50 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at kddilabs.jp Received: from mandala.kddilabs.jp ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mandala.kddilabs.jp [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ASLtw7lFH51N for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:52:49 +0900 (JST) Received: from platinum.inc.kddilabs.jp (platinum.inc.kddilabs.jp [IPv6:2001:200:601:1300:172:19:83:254]) by mandala.kddilabs.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A797174815D for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:52:49 +0900 (JST) Received: from dhcp249.east-2f.cn.kddilabs.jp (platinum [IPv6:::1]) by platinum.inc.kddilabs.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8F5F578063 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:52:46 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <4F0D4DE1.6090603@kddilabs.jp> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:52:49 +0900 From: "Ogaki, Kenichi" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: l2vpn@ietf.org Subject: Re: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 08:53:35 -0000 Yes, support. Kenichi On 1/10/12 3:39 AM, Giles Heron wrote: > This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-04 > > should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. > > Now that we've accepted the requirements and framework drafts (I think > Nabil's about to send email to the list re the framework!), it's time to > start considering whether the solutions drafts we have (this draft and the > pbb-epvn draft) are the right basis for our solutions docs. > > Please review the draft and respond by Monday January 23rd with comments as > to its suitability for WG adoption. > > Giles > > > From ilya@nobulus.com Wed Jan 11 03:43:04 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF8D21F881C for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 03:43:04 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RAez2lxqs2nb for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 03:43:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobulus.com (nobulus.com [IPv6:2001:6f8:892:6ff::11:152]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 104D721F8817 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 03:43:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobulus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nobulus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE122172D8; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:43:00 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at nobulus.com Received: from nobulus.com ([127.0.0.1]) by nobulus.com (nobulus.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id hckXmGsYWu0X; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:42:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from hnivarlas1 (unknown [IPv6:2001:6f8:892:6f8:1000:f01e:b999:bcaf]) by nobulus.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 70CB3172D0; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:42:52 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4AB9802809334AA1B16D8F375972F299@hnivarlas1> From: "iLya" To: "Giles Heron" , References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:42:48 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 11:43:04 -0000 I tentatively support this draft. However I'd like to ask whether it would be not more proper to decouple control-plane flooding (BGP-related stuff) and learning/forwarding? The reason is that it's possible to devise a method other than described in the draft to distribute MAC addresses (e.g. using IGP) while utilising the same learning/forwarding mechanism described in this draft. Likewise, a forwarding mechanism supporting active-active multihoming for Broadcast, Unknown unicast, Multicast traffic can be envisioned that could use same flooding method (BGP) as described in this draft. To avoid future works to be build upon draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn a split would be helpful. Thoughts? Cheers, iLya -------------------------------------------------- From: "Giles Heron" Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 7:39 PM To: Subject: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn > This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-04 > > should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. > > Now that we've accepted the requirements and framework drafts (I think > Nabil's about to send email to the list re the framework!), it's time to > start considering whether the solutions drafts we have (this draft and the > pbb-epvn draft) are the right basis for our solutions docs. > > Please review the draft and respond by Monday January 23rd with comments > as > to its suitability for WG adoption. > > Giles > > > From robert@raszuk.net Wed Jan 11 21:41:27 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66B0321F86E1 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 21:41:27 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9XFTpHqEqzGm for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 21:41:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1310.opentransfer.com (mail1310.opentransfer.com [76.162.254.103]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5943821F86E0 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 21:41:26 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 18839 invoked by uid 399); 12 Jan 2012 05:41:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.1.174.182?) (64.139.13.142) by mail1310.opentransfer.com with ESMTP; 12 Jan 2012 05:41:22 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 64.139.13.142 Message-ID: <4F0E7285.60400@raszuk.net> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 06:41:25 +0100 From: Robert Raszuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Giles Heron , l2vpn@ietf.org Subject: Re: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: robert@raszuk.net List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 05:41:27 -0000 Hi Giles & L2VPN WG, I do not support acceptance of this document. (Yes I realize I am a bit original in this thread with 26.5 supports already ;-) I find draft-sajassi-l2vpn-pbb-evpn as much more scalable solution yet fully covering services which draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn claims to offer. I also do not think this WG should proceed with both. Regarding Ilya's comment I 100% agree that control plane and data plane should be described in separate documents - that is referring to both pbb-evpn and evpn drafts. The fundamental reason for this is that while documents describe very well how to construct data plane they only bring "learning" based control plane as example. I think this is clear to everyone that there are other more efficient control planes today which do not follow "distribute information everywhere" flooding model. Especially in EVPN distributing customer MACs everywhere where there may never be a conversation seems in the number of applications as not even suboptimal .. but just broken. Editorial nit to draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-04.txt .. line 363 contains ref to [BGP-VPLS-MH] which is not found in references. The closest one is: [VPLS-MULTIHOMING]. Another nit is that it is hard to tell which references are normative and which are only informational. Rgs, R. > This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-04 > > should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. > > Now that we've accepted the requirements and framework drafts (I think > Nabil's about to send email to the list re the framework!), it's time to > start considering whether the solutions drafts we have (this draft and the > pbb-epvn draft) are the right basis for our solutions docs. > > Please review the draft and respond by Monday January 23rd with comments as > to its suitability for WG adoption. > > Giles > > > > From jiangyuanlong@huawei.com Wed Jan 11 21:57:30 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F1221F8755 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 21:57:30 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iCoYAWNj371B for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 21:57:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com (szxga04-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.67]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB2A21F8753 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 21:57:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from huawei.com (szxga04-in [172.24.2.12]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LXO00INO8GYOK@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for l2vpn@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:55:46 +0800 (CST) Received: from szxrg01-dlp.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LXO0041T8GX9O@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for l2vpn@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:55:46 +0800 (CST) Received: from szxeml203-edg.china.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.1.9-GA) with ESMTP id AGJ89139; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:55:46 +0800 Received: from SZXEML416-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.155) by szxeml203-edg.china.huawei.com (172.24.2.55) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:55:37 +0800 Received: from SZXEML508-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.81]) by szxeml416-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.155]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:55:34 +0800 Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 05:55:33 +0000 From: Jiangyuanlong Subject: RE: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn In-reply-to: X-Originating-IP: [10.70.40.82] To: Giles Heron Message-id: <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68B1750C6C9@SZXEML508-MBX.china.huawei.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: zh-CN Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Thread-topic: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-index: AQHM0O7MjtjOAUCDPE2Aqiqzz+5ang== X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected References: Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 05:57:30 -0000 Yes/Support. Regards Yuanlong ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:39:44 +0000 From: Giles Heron To: Subject: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-04 should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. Now that we've accepted the requirements and framework drafts (I think Nabil's about to send email to the list re the framework!), it's time to start considering whether the solutions drafts we have (this draft and the pbb-epvn draft) are the right basis for our solutions docs. Please review the draft and respond by Monday January 23rd with comments as to its suitability for WG adoption. Giles From jie.dong@huawei.com Wed Jan 11 23:10:31 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 949F621F84EA for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:10:31 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.449 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.151, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S8mimMPlKlgz for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:10:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (szxga03-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.66]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B76421F843C for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:10:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from huawei.com (szxga03-in [172.24.2.9]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LXO00HOVBW939@szxga03-in.huawei.com> for l2vpn@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:09:45 +0800 (CST) Received: from szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LXO00LAYBVJBV@szxga03-in.huawei.com> for l2vpn@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:09:45 +0800 (CST) Received: from szxeml205-edg.china.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.1.9-GA) with ESMTP id AGG64372; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:09:45 +0800 Received: from SZXEML408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.95) by szxeml205-edg.china.huawei.com (172.24.2.57) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:09:35 +0800 Received: from SZXEML509-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.21]) by szxeml408-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.95]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:09:36 +0800 Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 07:09:34 +0000 From: Jie Dong Subject: RE: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn In-reply-to: <4F0E7285.60400@raszuk.net> X-Originating-IP: [10.108.4.57] To: "robert@raszuk.net" , Giles Heron , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Message-id: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92722A4938C@szxeml509-mbx.china.huawei.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: zh-CN Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Thread-topic: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-index: AcyQBRR+BnU8yNibqEe6U5jsOUZ2Xw++PmW4AGrtlYAAEzkEoA== X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected References: <4F0E7285.60400@raszuk.net> X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 07:10:31 -0000 Hi Robert, > I think this is clear to everyone that there > are other more efficient control planes today which do not follow > "distribute information everywhere" flooding model. Especially in EVPN > distributing customer MACs everywhere where there may never be a > conversation seems in the number of applications as not even suboptimal > .. but just broken. Agree that flooding customer MACs everywhere is not good. Here we may consider using RTC mechanism [RFC4684]. Then one of my concern is about the Auto-Derivation of the Route Target from Ethernet Tag ID. This way the automatically generated RTs may be overlapped with RT spaces of other VPN services (e.g. L3VPN), and we know overlapped RT space would impact the effect of RTC. Regards, Jie > > > This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: > > > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-04 > > > > should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. > > > > Now that we've accepted the requirements and framework drafts (I think > > Nabil's about to send email to the list re the framework!), it's time to > > start considering whether the solutions drafts we have (this draft and the > > pbb-epvn draft) are the right basis for our solutions docs. > > > > Please review the draft and respond by Monday January 23rd with comments > as > > to its suitability for WG adoption. > > > > Giles > > > > > > > > From robert@raszuk.net Wed Jan 11 23:17:12 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9932821F85EF for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:17:12 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5BwzWzktjIkA for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:17:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1310.opentransfer.com (mail1310.opentransfer.com [76.162.254.103]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7099421F8456 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:17:11 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 13517 invoked by uid 399); 12 Jan 2012 07:17:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.1.174.182?) (64.139.11.254) by mail1310.opentransfer.com with ESMTP; 12 Jan 2012 07:17:10 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 64.139.11.254 Message-ID: <4F0E88F8.6030909@raszuk.net> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:17:12 +0100 From: Robert Raszuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jie Dong Subject: Re: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn References: <4F0E7285.60400@raszuk.net> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92722A4938C@szxeml509-mbx.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92722A4938C@szxeml509-mbx.china.huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: robert@raszuk.net List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 07:17:12 -0000 Hello Jie, > Agree that flooding customer MACs everywhere is not good. Here we may > consider using RTC mechanism [RFC4684]. Well I am well going beyond that. I actually assumed RFC4684 is in effect already .. one of the reasons I asked for normative references :). In particular I am talking about data center inter-connectivity where large number of the VMs _belonging_ to the same customer E-VPN may never need to exchange data between each other yet their respective MSEs may be loaded with huge number of MAC addresses for no reason. As a matter of fact PBB-EVPN doc says is very clearly: In typical operation, an [E-VPN] MES sends a BGP MAC Advertisement Route per customer/client MAC (C-MAC) address. In certain applications, this poses scalability challenges, as is the case in virtualized data center environments where the number of virtual machines (VMs), and hence the number of C-MAC addresses, can be in the millions. In such scenarios, it is required to reduce the number of BGP MAC Advertisement routes by relying on a MAC 'summarization' scheme, as is provided by PBB. Note that the MAC sub-netting capability already built into E-VPN is not sufficient in those environments, as will be discussed next. Best, R. From jie.dong@huawei.com Wed Jan 11 23:49:06 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8367521F864A for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:49:06 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.524 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.524 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eVt4fwcptt0I for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:49:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com (szxga04-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.67]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E5821F85F3 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:49:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from huawei.com (szxga04-in [172.24.2.12]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LXO002AVDPKHA@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for l2vpn@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:48:57 +0800 (CST) Received: from szxrg01-dlp.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LXO00LRDDP6HV@szxga04-in.huawei.com> for l2vpn@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:48:56 +0800 (CST) Received: from szxeml201-edg.china.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.1.9-GA) with ESMTP id AGJ99626; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:48:55 +0800 Received: from SZXEML410-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.137) by szxeml201-edg.china.huawei.com (172.24.2.39) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:48:49 +0800 Received: from SZXEML509-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.21]) by szxeml410-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.137]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:48:48 +0800 Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 07:48:47 +0000 From: Jie Dong Subject: RE: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn In-reply-to: <4F0E88F8.6030909@raszuk.net> X-Originating-IP: [10.108.4.57] To: "robert@raszuk.net" Message-id: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92722A493C2@szxeml509-mbx.china.huawei.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: zh-CN Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Thread-topic: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-index: AcyQBRR+BnU8yNibqEe6U5jsOUZ2Xw++PmW4AGrtlYAAEzkEoP//gPoA//92ObA= X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected References: <4F0E7285.60400@raszuk.net> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92722A4938C@szxeml509-mbx.china.huawei.com> <4F0E88F8.6030909@raszuk.net> Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 07:49:06 -0000 Hi Robert, > > Agree that flooding customer MACs everywhere is not good. Here we may > > consider using RTC mechanism [RFC4684]. > > Well I am well going beyond that. I actually assumed RFC4684 is in > effect already .. one of the reasons I asked for normative references :). OK > In particular I am talking about data center inter-connectivity > where large number of the VMs _belonging_ to the same customer E-VPN may > never need to exchange data between each other yet their respective MSEs > may be loaded with huge number of MAC addresses for no reason. > > As a matter of fact PBB-EVPN doc says is very clearly: > > In typical operation, an [E-VPN] MES sends a BGP MAC Advertisement > Route per customer/client MAC (C-MAC) address. In certain > applications, this poses scalability challenges, as is the case in > virtualized data center environments where the number of virtual > machines (VMs), and hence the number of C-MAC addresses, can be in > the millions. In such scenarios, it is required to reduce the number > of BGP MAC Advertisement routes by relying on a MAC 'summarization' > scheme, as is provided by PBB. Note that the MAC sub-netting > capability already built into E-VPN is not sufficient in those > environments, as will be discussed next. For MES to learn only C-MACs of active traffic, PBB-EVPN draft proposes to learn C-MAC through data-plane: The MES nodes perform the following functions: - Learn customer/client MAC addresses (C-MACs) over the attachment circuits in the data-plane, per normal bridge operation. - Learn remote C-MAC to B-MAC bindings in the data-plane from traffic ingress from the core per [802.1ah] bridging operation. Data-plane learning means unknown unicast broadcasting cannot be eliminated. And as you say that "there are other more efficient control planes today which do not follow "distribute information everywhere" flooding model", can one of them replace the C-MAC data-plane learning in PBB-EVPN draft? Best regards, Jie From y.kamite@ntt.com Thu Jan 12 05:22:34 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CA3521F8582 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 05:22:34 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c28NCYocy79J for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 05:22:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from mgw4.noc.ntt.com (mgw4.noc.ntt.com [210.160.15.15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46A8621F854B for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 05:22:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from mop1.noc.ntt.com by mgw4.noc.ntt.com (NTT-Com MailSV) with ESMTP id q0CDMTFd025212; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:22:29 +0900 (JST) Received: from mip02.noc.ntt.com (mvi2.noc.ntt.com) by mop1.noc.ntt.com (NTT-Com MailSV) with ESMTP id <0LXO0039PT5DCW@ntt.com>; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:22:29 +0900 (JST) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:22:26 +0900 From: "Yuji KAMITE" Subject: RE: VPMS Framework & Requirements In-reply-to: To: "'Giles Heron'" , l2vpn@ietf.org Message-id: <00e701ccd12d$3a096710$ae1c3530$%kamite@ntt.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: ja Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Thread-index: AczPqDBgYyqc6Jaur0mKq8DOc4E1EQBg/Faw References: X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:22:34 -0000 Yes, I'm happy to work on this. Yuji > -----Original Message----- > From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Giles Heron > Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 11:58 PM > To: l2vpn@ietf.org > Subject: VPMS Framework & Requirements > > Hi everyone, > > At IETF82 in Taipei we polled the room to ask if there was any interest by > non-authors in the VPMS Framework & Requirements draft: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpms-frmwk-requirements-04 > > There were no hands raised in the room, and hence we decided to poll the > working group list to see if there's any interest. > > So would people please respond within the next two weeks (i.e. by Tuesday > January 24th) if they have interest in seeing this draft progressed to RFC. > Responses by non-authors, and by carriers, would be especially welcome. > > If there is sufficient interest in seeing this draft progress we will > attempt to arrange for expert review of the draft before progressing it to > RFC. > > Nabil & Giles From josh.rogers@twcable.com Thu Jan 12 06:40:55 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1856421F85F4 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 06:40:55 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.463 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.463 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_MODEMCABLE=0.768, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PmiDW38isBf6 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 06:40:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from cdpipgw02.twcable.com (cdpipgw02.twcable.com [165.237.59.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F9821F85F3 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 06:40:54 -0800 (PST) X-SENDER-IP: 10.136.163.15 X-SENDER-REPUTATION: None X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,498,1320642000"; d="scan'208";a="307262634" Received: from unknown (HELO PRVPEXHUB06.corp.twcable.com) ([10.136.163.15]) by cdpipgw02.twcable.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 12 Jan 2012 09:39:10 -0500 Received: from PRVPEXVS08.corp.twcable.com ([10.136.163.37]) by PRVPEXHUB06.corp.twcable.com ([10.136.163.15]) with mapi; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:40:51 -0500 From: "Rogers, Josh" To: Giles Heron Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:40:49 -0500 Subject: Re: VPMS Framework & Requirements Thread-Topic: VPMS Framework & Requirements Thread-Index: AczROC27T/gqhI9kTXWvHrOjraAa3w== Message-ID: <4F0EF0F1.1070307@twcable.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111124 Thunderbird/8.0 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:40:55 -0000 We have adopted L2VPN, and in practice find only a handful of shortfalls. = At the top of the list of shortfalls is 'ability to prevent customer traffi= c that has egressed the L2VPN from re-entering', in other words 'loop preve= ntion on ACs', and also 'efficient support of multicast customer traffic'. Customers are 'turned off' when we tell them that our service will treat th= eir multicast just like it was broadcast. in short, I have interest. On 01/10/2012 08:57 AM, Giles Heron wrote: Hi everyone, At IETF82 in Taipei we polled the room to ask if there was any interest by non-authors in the VPMS Framework & Requirements draft: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpms-frmwk-requirements-04 There were no hands raised in the room, and hence we decided to poll the working group list to see if there's any interest. So would people please respond within the next two weeks (i.e. by Tuesday January 24th) if they have interest in seeing this draft progressed to RFC. Responses by non-authors, and by carriers, would be especially welcome. If there is sufficient interest in seeing this draft progress we will attempt to arrange for expert review of the draft before progressing it to RFC. Nabil & Giles ________________________________ This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable propri= etary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyrig= ht belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the u= se of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the= intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissem= ination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents= of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawf= ul. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender imm= ediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail an= d any printout. From robert@raszuk.net Thu Jan 12 09:31:09 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43C5421F858E for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:31:09 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KoAh8RMRaO2a for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:31:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1310.opentransfer.com (mail1310.opentransfer.com [76.162.254.103]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8801321F8573 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:31:08 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 30376 invoked by uid 399); 12 Jan 2012 17:31:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?216.69.69.180?) (216.69.69.180) by mail1310.opentransfer.com with ESMTP; 12 Jan 2012 17:31:07 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 216.69.69.180 Message-ID: <4F0F18DE.3090202@raszuk.net> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:31:10 +0100 From: Robert Raszuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jie Dong Subject: Re: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn References: <4F0E7285.60400@raszuk.net> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92722A4938C@szxeml509-mbx.china.huawei.com> <4F0E88F8.6030909@raszuk.net> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92722A493C2@szxeml509-mbx.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92722A493C2@szxeml509-mbx.china.huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: robert@raszuk.net List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:31:09 -0000 Hi Jie, > Data-plane learning means unknown unicast broadcasting cannot be > eliminated. And as you say that "there are other more efficient > control planes today which do not follow "distribute information > everywhere" flooding model", can one of them replace the C-MAC > data-plane learning in PBB-EVPN draft? Yes it can. However I do not see this as showstopper from proceeding forward with current pbb-evpn document including data plane based MAC learning. Thx, R. From Internet-Drafts@ietf.org Thu Jan 12 17:15:03 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2AAD21F84FE; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:15:02 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.565 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.565 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.034, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0GVjTWJF3jbX; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:15:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C2221F851C; Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:15:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; Boundary="NextPart" From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-l2vpn-arp-mediation-19.txt X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 3.64p1 Message-ID: <20120113011502.11342.75509.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:15:02 -0800 Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 01:15:03 -0000 --NextPart A new Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Working Group of the IETF. Title : ARP Mediation for IP Interworking of Layer 2 VPN Author(s) : H. Shah, et al Filename : draft-ietf-l2vpn-arp-mediation-19.txt Pages : 33 Date : 2012-01-12 The Virtual Private Wire Service (VPWS) [RFC4664] provides point-to-point connections between pairs of Customer Edge (CE) devices. It does so by binding two Attachment Circuits (each connecting a CE device with a Provider Edge, PE, device) to a pseudowire (connecting the two PEs). In general, the Attachment Circuits must be of the same technology (e.g., both Ethernet, both ATM), and the pseudowire must carry the frames of that technology. However, if it is known that the frames' payload consists solely of IP datagrams, it is possible to provide a point-to-point connection in which the pseudowire connects Attachment Circuits of different technologies. This requires the PEs to perform a function known as "ARP Mediation". ARP Mediation refers to the process of resolving Layer 2 addresses when different resolution protocols are used on either Attachment Circuit. The methods described in this document are applicable even when the CEs run a routing protocol between them, as long as the routing protocol runs over IP. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-l2vpn-arp-mediation-19.txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the Internet-Draft. --NextPart Content-Type: Message/External-body; name="draft-ietf-l2vpn-arp-mediation-19.txt"; site="ftp.ietf.org"; access-type="anon-ftp"; directory="internet-drafts" Content-Type: text/plain Content-ID: <2012-01-12170200.I-D@ietf.org> --NextPart-- From Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com Sun Jan 15 03:34:21 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F7E021F84AF for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 03:34:21 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.317 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.317 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.604, BAYES_05=-1.11, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gEO+IS2rTKA2 for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 03:34:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail182.messagelabs.com (mail182.messagelabs.com [85.158.139.83]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CE48721F8474 for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 03:34:15 -0800 (PST) X-Env-Sender: Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com X-Msg-Ref: server-16.tower-182.messagelabs.com!1326627252!3640385!1 X-Originating-IP: [147.234.242.235] X-StarScan-Version: 6.4.3; banners=-,-,- Received: (qmail 10986 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2012 11:34:13 -0000 Received: from ilptbmg02-out.ecitele.com (HELO ilptbmg02.ecitele.com) (147.234.242.235) by server-16.tower-182.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 15 Jan 2012 11:34:13 -0000 X-AuditID: 93eaf2e8-b7fc36d000002072-dc-4f12baa36f76 Received: from ilptexch01.ecitele.com ( [172.31.244.40]) by ilptbmg02.ecitele.com (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 14.4C.08306.3AAB21F4; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 13:38:11 +0200 (IST) Received: from ILPTMAIL02.ecitele.com ([147.234.244.213]) by ilptexch01.ecitele.com ([172.31.244.40]) with mapi; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 13:34:11 +0200 From: Alexander Vainshtein To: "draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-vpls-pe-model@tools.ietf.org" Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 13:34:10 +0200 Subject: Mail regarding draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-vpls-pe-model Thread-Topic: Mail regarding draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-vpls-pe-model Thread-Index: AczTeZmR3QnnjFC1RNajW3NvOKLtzA== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A3C5DF08D38B6049839A6F553B331C760115EDDBD5D2ILPTMAIL02e_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrFJsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUy+dWnL7qLdwn5G0yYYmPx4eVcJovH3w6x OzB5LFnyk8njy+XPbAFMUQ2MNol5efkliSWpCimpxcm2SgFFmWWJyZVKCpkptkqGSgoFOYnJ qbmpeSW2SokFBal5KUp2XAoYwAaoLDNPITUvOT8lMy/dVskz2F/XwsLUUtdQyU5N2dDYmisk I7NYIVU3NzEzRyE3tbg4MT1VASiSsIU54/6DQ6wF3coVM5c/Y2tgPCXXxcjJISFgIvHjzQkW CFtM4sK99WxdjFwcQgI7GSWaG9awQzhTGCV+bX7DCFLFJmArsWn1XTYQW0QgV6Jr11Ewm1lA VaJl0z6wGhYge9+FH2C2sICVxJTN15gh6u0l/j74wAhh60l03u9gB7F5BQIlHn+9CFbDCHTF 91NrmCBmikvcejKfCeI6AYkle84zQ9iiEi8f/2OFqBeVuNO+nhGiPl9ixeW7TBAzBSVOznwC 9ZmkxMEVN1gmMIrMQjJ2FpKWWUhaIOI6Egt2f2KDsLUlli18zQxjnznwmAlZfAEj+ypGycyc gpKk3HQDI9380hK91OTMktScVL3k/NxNjJCE8mIH4+0zmocYBTgYlXh4s9SF/IVYE8uKK3MP MUpyMCmJ8r7aBhTiS8pPqcxILM6ILyrNSS0+xCjBwawkwjt5MVCONyWxsiq1KB8m5QoM6YnM UtzJ+cAkmVcSb2xggJujJM7bnfzGV0ggHZgMs1NTC1KLYObIcHAoSfDK7ARaIViUmp5akZaZ U4KQZuLgBDmDB+iMLztAziguSMwtzkyHyJ9iVJQS570DkhAASWSU5sH1grJI/f///18xigM9 LczLCbKCB5iB4LpfAQ1mAhqc0wo2GJhF4FJSDYxJU/ZaGYrx7GfdW/HupfT57fPeXznvlzDJ adYkH4Pzpx9XuAr+cNctdOs3chP8ufCI/QMnP9eXO658k52gs+M996lpm2/aKfxwVjRr/Zkk rbDbTppx9Q61WRW52bvPM7B2xPXbzGjSTk2/e65ixu2jtjsX2Qu1sG0+VuqUJTXd562bt/+j 7rtKLMUZiYZazEXFiQCX0oWF/QMAAA== Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 11:34:21 -0000 --_000_A3C5DF08D38B6049839A6F553B331C760115EDDBD5D2ILPTMAIL02e_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, I have a question regarding draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-vpls-pe-model. In Section 4 "Packet Walkthrough" the draft, to the best of my understanding= , states that a packet received from one of the B- PWs is mapped to an appro= priate virtual interface of the B-component without any MAC lookup because B= -MAC.C-MAC-based forwarding per se is done by the B-component. It further states that forwarding from one virtual interface of the B-compon= ent to another such interface usually does not happen because there is only= one split horizon group in the VPLS instance. My reading of this text suggests that B-component of the 802.1ah bridge (and= hence presumably the 802.1ah bridge itself) is aware of split horizon group= s. On the other hand, the draft mentions usage of MSTP as the loop-breaking mec= hanism in 802.1ah. Did I miss something? If not, which component of the PE reference model is a= ware of split horizon groups? Regards, Sasha This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains informat= ion which is CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary to ECI Telecom. If yo= u have received this transmission in error, please inform us by e-mail, phon= e or fax, and then delete the original and all copies thereof. --_000_A3C5DF08D38B6049839A6F553B331C760115EDDBD5D2ILPTMAIL02e_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

Hi all,=

I have a question regarding draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-vp= ls-pe-model.

 

In Section 4 “Packet Walkthrough” the draft, to th= e best of my understanding, states that a packet received from one of the B-= PWs is mapped to an appropriate virtual interface of the B-component withou= t any MAC lookup because B-MAC.C-MAC-based forwarding per se is done by the= B-component.

It further states that forw= arding from one virtual interface of the B-component to another such interfa= ce usually does not happen because there is only one split horizon group in= the VPLS instance.

 

=

My reading of this text suggests that B-component of th= e 802.1ah bridge (and hence presumably the 802.1ah bridge itself) is aware o= f split horizon groups.

On the other hand= , the draft mentions usage of MSTP as the loop-breaking mechanism in 802.1ah= .

 

Did I miss something? If not, which component of the PE reference model i= s aware of split horizon groups?

&nb= sp;

Regards,

     Sasha

&nb= sp;

This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains informat= ion which is CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary to ECI Telecom. If yo= u have received this transmission in error, please inform us by e-mail, phon= e or fax, and then delete the original and all copies thereof.

--_000_A3C5DF08D38B6049839A6F553B331C760115EDDBD5D2ILPTMAIL02e_-- From haoweiguo@huawei.com Sun Jan 15 17:45:30 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A3CE21F84D8 for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 17:45:30 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.449 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_SUB_ENC_GB2312=1.345] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5ysYjHF-pfAr for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 17:45:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (szxga03-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.66]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A88221F84A6 for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2012 17:45:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from huawei.com (szxga03-in [172.24.2.9]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LXV00DTHBJJ15@szxga03-in.huawei.com> for l2vpn@ietf.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:45:19 +0800 (CST) Received: from szxrg01-dlp.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LXV00I46BJI3D@szxga03-in.huawei.com> for l2vpn@ietf.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:45:19 +0800 (CST) Received: from szxeml203-edg.china.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.1.9-GA) with ESMTP id AGL22123; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:44:44 +0800 Received: from SZXEML421-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.160) by szxeml203-edg.china.huawei.com (172.24.2.55) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:44:42 +0800 Received: from SZXEML511-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.206]) by szxeml421-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.160]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:44:34 +0800 Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 01:44:33 +0000 From: Haoweiguo Subject: =?gb2312?B?tPC4tDogV0cgYWRvcHRpb24gb2YgZHJhZnQtcmFnZ2Fyd2Etc2FqYXNzaS1s?= =?gb2312?Q?2vpn-evpn?= In-reply-to: X-Originating-IP: [10.138.80.154] To: Giles Heron , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=gb2312 Content-language: zh-CN Content-transfer-encoding: base64 Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Thread-topic: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-index: AcyQBRR+BnU8yNibqEe6U5jsOUZ2Xw++PmW4ATyUMd0= X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected References: X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 01:45:30 -0000 U3VwcG9ydA0KX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0Kt6K8/sjL OiBsMnZwbi1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnIFtsMnZwbi1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnXSC0+rHtIEdp bGVzIEhlcm9uIFtnaWxlcy5oZXJvbkBnbWFpbC5jb21dDQq3osvNyrG85DogMjAxMsTqMdTCMTDI 1SAyOjM5DQq1vTogbDJ2cG5AaWV0Zi5vcmcNCtb3zOI6IFdHIGFkb3B0aW9uIG9mIGRyYWZ0LXJh Z2dhcndhLXNhamFzc2ktbDJ2cG4tZXZwbg0KDQpUaGlzIGlzIGEgcmVxdWVzdCB0byBnYXVnZSBj b25zZW5zdXMgYXMgdG8gd2hldGhlcjoNCg0KaHR0cDovL3Rvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnL2h0bWwvZHJh ZnQtcmFnZ2Fyd2Etc2FqYXNzaS1sMnZwbi1ldnBuLTA0DQoNCnNob3VsZCBiZSBhY2NlcHRlZCBh cyBhbiBMMlZQTiBXRyBkcmFmdC4NCg0KTm93IHRoYXQgd2UndmUgYWNjZXB0ZWQgdGhlIHJlcXVp cmVtZW50cyBhbmQgZnJhbWV3b3JrIGRyYWZ0cyAoSSB0aGluaw0KTmFiaWwncyBhYm91dCB0byBz ZW5kIGVtYWlsIHRvIHRoZSBsaXN0IHJlIHRoZSBmcmFtZXdvcmshKSwgaXQncyB0aW1lIHRvDQpz dGFydCBjb25zaWRlcmluZyB3aGV0aGVyIHRoZSBzb2x1dGlvbnMgZHJhZnRzIHdlIGhhdmUgKHRo aXMgZHJhZnQgYW5kIHRoZQ0KcGJiLWVwdm4gZHJhZnQpIGFyZSB0aGUgcmlnaHQgYmFzaXMgZm9y IG91ciBzb2x1dGlvbnMgZG9jcy4NCg0KUGxlYXNlIHJldmlldyB0aGUgZHJhZnQgYW5kIHJlc3Bv bmQgYnkgTW9uZGF5IEphbnVhcnkgMjNyZCB3aXRoIGNvbW1lbnRzIGFzDQp0byBpdHMgc3VpdGFi aWxpdHkgZm9yIFdHIGFkb3B0aW9uLg0KDQpHaWxlcw0KDQoNCg== From ssalam@cisco.com Mon Jan 16 13:51:33 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9FE621F869D for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:51:32 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B4zQyhQHVlOB for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:51:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from mtv-iport-1.cisco.com (mtv-iport-1.cisco.com [173.36.130.12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D82E21F8694 for ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:51:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=ssalam@cisco.com; l=716; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1326750692; x=1327960292; h=date:subject:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=2uqUqHZ2MlkZC1enIKfsh/Unj+ko6qFy62knIzoP6ic=; b=mViNA41ffwrvYeJj7vN9ewuRZTjx+pM5GWYwDarTNbs2iYi5NptoXteO pGpXfLe9V7yXo+kMfF8RVjU5i9pGqpOYoPZqKUv3QAC3LMlYEJuvDLsve L0EStTsLyPq+ZA/ctXIi45KYEQqLWYHXdSxl4/2XrDCSdwrQYqJ02oBl3 M=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAKGbFE+rRDoH/2dsb2JhbABErDCBDIEFgXIBAQEDARIBJwIBQQ0BCGc2AQEEARIbB4dYCJdtAZ4HiSsBATACAQENBQQRBQEGAQEGAQUMBAEBBgIFAwEBBwEBAgEBAgMBAgEBAQECgwWEHASIO4xWinuHZw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,520,1320624000"; d="scan'208";a="23960790" Received: from mtv-core-2.cisco.com ([171.68.58.7]) by mtv-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 16 Jan 2012 21:51:32 +0000 Received: from xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-221.cisco.com [128.107.191.63]) by mtv-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q0GLpW6I023731; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:51:32 GMT Received: from xmb-sjc-233.amer.cisco.com ([128.107.191.88]) by xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:51:31 -0800 Received: from 10.21.88.32 ([10.21.88.32]) by xmb-sjc-233.amer.cisco.com ([128.107.191.88]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:51:31 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.27.0.100910 Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:51:30 -0800 Subject: Re: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn From: Samer Salam To: Giles Heron , Message-ID: Thread-Topic: WG adoption of draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn Thread-Index: AcyQBRR+BnU8yNibqEe6U5jsOUZ2Xw++PmW4AWa8wIc= In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Jan 2012 21:51:31.0798 (UTC) FILETIME=[02253760:01CCD499] X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:51:33 -0000 Support. Regards, Samer On 12-01-09 10:39 AM, "Giles Heron" wrote: > This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-raggarwa-sajassi-l2vpn-evpn-04 > > should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. > > Now that we've accepted the requirements and framework drafts (I think > Nabil's about to send email to the list re the framework!), it's time to > start considering whether the solutions drafts we have (this draft and the > pbb-epvn draft) are the right basis for our solutions docs. > > Please review the draft and respond by Monday January 23rd with comments as > to its suitability for WG adoption. > > Giles > > From yuqun.cao@gmail.com Sun Jan 22 06:46:25 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E4D21F84A2 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 06:46:25 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fZR0lJ79ByqB for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 06:46:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C610B21F8466 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 06:46:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by iagf6 with SMTP id f6so2274985iag.31 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 06:46:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language; bh=RocWKID5aaj/j4xJPvRQ/bwQBpZoaaatDDcHvuYXz34=; b=togOaWo6P8oVyS+7oAA8j51ZFfJTQZik6hHz5bOg0OwFI5FLJ62es0uR8UqEInS+jL wtp/m/Hqa+cr2J/svzSPHATo6SD9Czq+PBUP6THwpp1gSLQRpQdNrM2w9T180UMA40tL 2a0b3TW2O5rjUoEwGSjz61cfImWL0liUQf8BU= Received: by 10.42.150.6 with SMTP id y6mr4874575icv.14.1327243584501; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 06:46:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from Server ([112.111.62.228]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gd2sm11173553igc.1.2012.01.22.06.46.19 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 22 Jan 2012 06:46:23 -0800 (PST) From: "Sam Cao" To: Subject: I-D: Extension to signaling in VPLS for E-Tree Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 22:47:47 +0800 Message-ID: <001701ccd914$d47284f0$7d578ed0$@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AczZFG4rF3SjTfvEQiSgcNkAEq++EQ== Content-Language: zh-cn X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 14:46:25 -0000 Hi L2VPN Group members, L2VPN group will converge one single solution on E-Tree, and I wish this daft can share some good idea for that. I updated "Extension to signaling in VPLS for E-Tree" (http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-cao-l2vpn-vpls-etree-01.txt) per some feedback. This draft can implement E-Tree easily with minor extension on VPLS application (RFC 4762, RFC 4761, RFC 6074). In one word, this draft will create one or more PWs (Maximum is 3 PWs) between PEs in a VPLS domain, but just breaks communication path between Leaf endpoints, so after PW are created, data plane will not care where the frame originated from. If there is one PW binding two ACs, the forwarding is allowed. This is nearly similar to "VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support", but the latter solution uses Root VLAN ID and Leaf VLAN ID to indicate the frames, but still one single PW between PEs in one VPLS domain. This is big difference, I think. Data plane also participate in forwarding decision in "Extension to LDP-VPLS for E-Tree Using Two PW". Could you please review it and collaborate on the mailing list, or direct to the author? Looking forward to your feedback. Thank you very much for your time, Regards, Yuqun(Sam) Cao From paul.doolan@nsn.com Sun Jan 22 05:02:46 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0E8321F8476 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 05:02:46 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OOnQZDuL--BX for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 05:02:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (demumfd001.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.32]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C26BC21F8472 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 05:02:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.56]) by demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id q0MD2fv5029856 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 14:02:41 +0100 Received: from demuexc022.nsn-intra.net (demuexc022.nsn-intra.net [10.150.128.35]) by demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id q0MD2fJU003976 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 14:02:41 +0100 Received: from CNBEEXC007.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.192.12]) by demuexc022.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 22 Jan 2012 14:02:41 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CCD906.1E4DBCBF" Subject: Re: VPMS Framework & Requirements Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 21:02:35 +0800 Message-ID: <44A5364BC1FA1E42B1F133529EC2C72901AC05B6@CNBEEXC007.nsn-intra.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Re: VPMS Framework & Requirements Thread-Index: AczZBhx97W/oUXsQR7OiQfcnSrHkMQ== From: "Doolan, Paul (NSN - US/Irving)" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jan 2012 13:02:41.0253 (UTC) FILETIME=[1FBEC950:01CCD906] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 05:18:11 -0800 X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:09:17 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CCD906.1E4DBCBF Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Support. (This is different from Etree.... ) pd > -----Original Message----- > From: l2vpn-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Giles Heron > Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 11:58 PM > To: l2vpn at ietf.org > Subject: VPMS Framework & Requirements >=20 > Hi everyone, >=20 > At IETF82 in Taipei we polled the room to ask if there was any interest by > non-authors in the VPMS Framework & Requirements draft: >=20 > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpms-frmwk-requirements-04 >=20 > There were no hands raised in the room, and hence we decided to poll the > working group list to see if there's any interest. >=20 > So would people please respond within the next two weeks (i.e. by Tuesday > January 24th) if they have interest in seeing this draft progressed to RFC. > Responses by non-authors, and by carriers, would be especially welcome. >=20 > If there is sufficient interest in seeing this draft progress we will > attempt to arrange for expert review of the draft before progressing it to > RFC. >=20 > Nabil & Giles ------_=_NextPart_001_01CCD906.1E4DBCBF Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Re: VPMS Framework & Requirements

Support.

(This is different from Etree…. = )

pd

> -----Original Message-----

> From: l2vpn-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Giles = Heron

> Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 11:58 PM

> To: l2vpn at ietf.org

> Subject: VPMS Framework & Requirements

>

> Hi everyone,

>

> At IETF82 in Taipei we polled the room to ask if there was any = interest by

> non-authors in the VPMS Framework & Requirements = draft:

>

> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpms-frmwk-requirements-04

>

> There were no hands raised in the room, and hence we decided = to poll the

> working group list to see if there's any = interest.

>

> So would people please respond within the next two weeks (i.e. = by Tuesday

> January 24th) if they have interest in seeing this draft = progressed to RFC.

> Responses by non-authors, and by carriers, would be especially = welcome.

>

> If there is sufficient interest in seeing this draft progress = we will

> attempt to arrange for expert review of the draft before = progressing it to

> RFC.

>

> Nabil & Giles

------_=_NextPart_001_01CCD906.1E4DBCBF-- From DanielC@orckit.com Tue Jan 24 06:53:20 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 105E921F85B6; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 06:53:20 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UDAEB6Ji3I0n; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 06:53:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from tlvmail1.orckit.com (tlvmail1.orckit.com [109.226.33.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B099321F85B5; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 06:53:15 -0800 (PST) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [PWE3] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pwe3-pw-typed-wc-fec-01.txt Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:53:13 +0200 Message-ID: <44F4E579A764584EA9BDFD07D0CA08130753B985@tlvmail1> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [PWE3] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pwe3-pw-typed-wc-fec-01.txt Thread-Index: AczPQT1sBsYZBv6vSOGAt57bNBAjSAGogWvgASMi+YA= References: <20120110023647.14526.74383.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> From: "Daniel Cohn" To: , , , Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:53:20 -0000 Hi authors, IIUC, the use of the FEC wildcard in your draft is limited to label withdrawal and status notification messages (actually the limitation comes from RFC 5918).=20 It seems to me that it would be useful to extend the use of the wildcard also to MAC address withdrawal messages, with a view to supporting MAC flush operations for a group of PWs. A scenario where this comes useful is LSP failure, where the PE would want to signal MAC flush over all PWs in the LSP in a single message.=20 What do you think?=20 Thanks, Daniel -----Original Message----- From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 4:37 AM To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Cc: pwe3@ietf.org Subject: [PWE3] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pwe3-pw-typed-wc-fec-01.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Pseudowire Emulation Edge to Edge Working Group of the IETF. Title : LDP Typed Wildcard FEC for the PW FEC Elements Author(s) : Kamran Raza Sami Boutros Carlos Pignataro Filename : draft-ietf-pwe3-pw-typed-wc-fec-01.txt Pages : 8 Date : 2012-01-09 The "Typed Wildcard Forwarding Equivalence Class (FEC) Element" defines an extension to the Label Distribution Protocol (LDP) that can be used when it is desired to request or withdraw or release all label bindings for a given FEC Element type. However, a typed wildcard FEC element must be individually defined for each FEC element type. This specification defines the typed wildcard FEC elements for the PWid (0x80), Generalized PWid (0x81), and P2MP PW (0x82) FEC element types. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pwe3-pw-typed-wc-fec-01.t xt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pwe3-pw-typed-wc-fec-01.tx t _______________________________________________ pwe3 mailing list pwe3@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3 From cpignata@cisco.com Fri Jan 27 09:31:25 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E02A221F860B for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:31:25 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -110.261 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.261 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.338, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L3u7E1IE3shE for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:31:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from av-tac-rtp.cisco.com (hen.cisco.com [64.102.19.198]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5496B21F85CE for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 09:31:25 -0800 (PST) X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned Received: from chook.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-rtp.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q0RHVO7i006636 for ; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:31:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.117.115.58] (rtp-cpignata-8919.cisco.com [10.117.115.58]) by chook.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q0RHVKLH017664; Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:31:20 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4F22DF66.5020509@cisco.com> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:31:18 -0500 From: Carlos Pignataro Organization: cisco Systems, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100228 Thunderbird/2.0.0.24 Mnenhy/0.7.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Cohn Subject: Re: [PWE3] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pwe3-pw-typed-wc-fec-01.txt References: <20120110023647.14526.74383.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <44F4E579A764584EA9BDFD07D0CA08130753B985@tlvmail1> In-Reply-To: <44F4E579A764584EA9BDFD07D0CA08130753B985@tlvmail1> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.4 X-Face: *3w8NvnQ|kS~V{&{U}$?G9U9EJQ8p9)O[1[1F'1i>XIc$5FR!hdAIf5}'Xu-3`^Z']h0J* ccB'fl/XJYR[+,Z+jj`4%06nd'y9[ln&ScJT5S+O18e^ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org, pwe3@ietf.org, skraza@cisco.com X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:31:26 -0000 Hi, Daniel, Thank you for the input! Yes, this sounds like a good suggestion and useful addition, as the FEC TLV is a parameter in the context of the MAC Address Withdraw. So a MAC Address Withdraw can be scoped beyond a single VPLS instance to all, or to all given a PW. We are working on some text to post an updated revision -03. Thanks, -- Carlos. On 1/24/2012 9:53 AM, Daniel Cohn wrote: > Hi authors, > > IIUC, the use of the FEC wildcard in your draft is limited to label > withdrawal and status notification messages (actually the limitation > comes from RFC 5918). > > It seems to me that it would be useful to extend the use of the wildcard > also to MAC address withdrawal messages, with a view to supporting MAC > flush operations for a group of PWs. A scenario where this comes useful > is LSP failure, where the PE would want to signal MAC flush over all PWs > in the LSP in a single message. > > What do you think? > > Thanks, > > Daniel > > -----Original Message----- > From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > internet-drafts@ietf.org > Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 4:37 AM > To: i-d-announce@ietf.org > Cc: pwe3@ietf.org > Subject: [PWE3] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pwe3-pw-typed-wc-fec-01.txt > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. This draft is a work item of the Pseudowire Emulation Edge > to Edge Working Group of the IETF. > > Title : LDP Typed Wildcard FEC for the PW FEC Elements > Author(s) : Kamran Raza > Sami Boutros > Carlos Pignataro > Filename : draft-ietf-pwe3-pw-typed-wc-fec-01.txt > Pages : 8 > Date : 2012-01-09 > > The "Typed Wildcard Forwarding Equivalence Class (FEC) Element" > defines an extension to the Label Distribution Protocol (LDP) that > can be used when it is desired to request or withdraw or release all > label bindings for a given FEC Element type. However, a typed > wildcard FEC element must be individually defined for each FEC > element type. This specification defines the typed wildcard FEC > elements for the PWid (0x80), Generalized PWid (0x81), and P2MP PW > (0x82) FEC element types. > > > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pwe3-pw-typed-wc-fec-01.t > xt > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pwe3-pw-typed-wc-fec-01.tx > t > > _______________________________________________ > pwe3 mailing list > pwe3@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3 > > From kreeger@cisco.com Mon Jan 30 11:40:37 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CF9B21F871A; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:40:37 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.002 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_32=0.6, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VXP9az9QSgc1; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:40:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from mtv-iport-1.cisco.com (mtv-iport-1.cisco.com [173.36.130.12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A05E21F8671; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:40:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=kreeger@cisco.com; l=3030; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1327952437; x=1329162037; h=date:subject:from:to:message-id:mime-version; bh=Eq+m/9Uw8hxigPzQcWOdpoWDgzEojDzGCKvO2jWXW2M=; b=Ni/XgITfdh4J/FbfK9nubiLxWtMEFhK3qNOvN2IXh/63CebYaNWlGzji z63QkGcgrsd7O/4rEywuUTXPpiz/j9R+2XAnQb7xgBs3XKpZ5OFB+FaPO WZCuTtLz9QLsOyiKWLCnumzCxr/3THJwbYIN0JmIAs1shSd4eZeZ74lOH A=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhkFAHPxJk+rRDoH/2dsb2JhbABDgk2jdwGHJmuBBYF0AQQBAQEPASoxHQEMAWgxAQQTCRIHh2OYcIEnAZ44iDYvBA8BCAEFCQYDCQEFCINUNS0BAwQICgESgxwEiD+MW5Jy X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,592,1320624000"; d="scan'208,217";a="26150290" Received: from mtv-core-2.cisco.com ([171.68.58.7]) by mtv-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Jan 2012 19:40:36 +0000 Received: from xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-211.cisco.com [171.70.151.144]) by mtv-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q0UJeaN2002189; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:40:36 GMT Received: from xmb-sjc-21e.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.156]) by xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:40:36 -0800 Received: from 10.21.146.181 ([10.21.146.181]) by xmb-sjc-21e.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.156]) via Exchange Front-End Server email.cisco.com ([128.107.191.79]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:40:36 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.20.0.090605 Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:40:36 -0800 Subject: Network Virtualization Overlay Control Plane Requirements posted From: Larry Kreeger To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Network Virtualization Overlay Control Plane Requirements posted Thread-Index: AczfhwmCNjK0MgCDPkWJDbI3krxH/A== Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3410768436_38387553" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Jan 2012 19:40:36.0566 (UTC) FILETIME=[09D86F60:01CCDF87] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:49:51 -0800 X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:40:37 -0000 > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --B_3410768436_38387553 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit To: nvo3 mailing list Bcc: l2vpn, l3vpn, dc, armd, vpn4dc mailing lists Hi everyone, I have recently posted a first draft of the Control Plane requirements for Network Virtualization Overlays. http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-kreeger-nvo3-overlay-cp-00.txt This draft is a follow-up to draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement-01 ( http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement-01 ) which makes the case for overlay networks in data centers (not restricted to L2 over L3) and the need for control plane solutions. If you have not read draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement-01, I highly suggest reading it first because the posted control plane reqs document picks up where it left off. Since the posted draft is a followup to draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement-01 , and there is already an NVO3 mailing list, please join and post any discussion and/or comments to nvo3@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 Thank you, Larry Kreeger --B_3410768436_38387553 Content-type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Network Virtualization Overlay Control Plane Requirements posted</TI= TLE> </HEAD> <BODY> <FONT FACE=3D"Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE=3D'font-size:11pt= '>To: nvo3 mailing list<BR> Bcc: l2vpn, l3vpn, dc, armd, vpn4dc mailing lists<BR> <BR> Hi everyone,<BR> <BR> I have recently posted a first draft of the Control Plane requirements for = Network Virtualization Overlays.  <BR> <BR> <a href=3D"http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-kreeger-nvo3-overlay-cp-00.txt">http:= //www.ietf.org/id/draft-kreeger-nvo3-overlay-cp-00.txt</a><BR> <BR> This draft is a follow-up to draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement-01= ( <a href=3D"http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-sta= tement-01">http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-stat= ement-01</a> ) which makes the case for overlay networks in data centers (no= t restricted to L2 over L3) and the need for control plane solutions.<BR> <BR> If you have not read draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-statement-01, I high= ly suggest reading it first because the posted control plane reqs document p= icks up where it left off.<BR> <BR> Since the posted draft is a followup to draft-narten-nvo3-overlay-problem-s= tatement-01 , and there is already an NVO3 mailing list, please join and pos= t any discussion and/or comments to <a href=3D"nvo3@ietf.org">nvo3@ietf.org</a= ><BR> <a href=3D"https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3">https://www.ietf.org/m= ailman/listinfo/nvo3</a><BR> <BR> Thank you,<BR> Larry Kreeger</SPAN></FONT> </BODY> </HTML> --B_3410768436_38387553--

Support.

 

Thanks,


Tariq

&nb= sp;

From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounc= es@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bitar, Nabil N
Sent: Friday, D= ecember 16, 2011 9:16 AM
To: l2vpn@ietf.org
Cc: Giles= Heron
Subject: [l2vpn] WG Poll for adopting the draft =B3A Fra= mework for E-Tree Service over MPLS Network=B2 as a WG document

 

Hi,

 

This is the start of a three-week working group poll for adopting= the draft ?A Framework for E-Tree Service over MPLS Network? as an L2VPN= WG document. 

 

The draft can be found at http://tools.ietf.org/htm= l/draft-key-l2vpn-etree-frwk-06 .
 
Please, review the draft and send any comments to t= he L2VPN working group email list. 

This WG poll will close on Friday January 6, 2012. 
Regards,
Nabil