From giheron@cisco.com Wed Aug 1 09:52:55 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45FA811E81FB for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 09:52:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b7DCDcv1+Ivw for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 09:52:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83AEE11E8151 for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 09:52:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=giheron@cisco.com; l=1083; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1343839974; x=1345049574; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=Q/NoKoKQljdEVopJ3BTYELNx7pcf4hKFHNPzVIWr3u0=; b=FPLBX5H5LYGL/jiC/3bDLtloxrFeBFzsWqQp3Y4ud/Sk9c+rCQETByEP 6rHVdfa3U/BRwPS4L97+RcOvC9TJ0LCr5k4MvQ5pvgEzG2hK9WgTCxUn+ P2Qau1bmT5quvoGi3TLO9JHR10iBdhsIMt+kE83AtUxwsioaVUxYHSudQ A=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EAGBeGVCtJXG8/2dsb2JhbABFuRCBB4IgAQIEEgEKHVEBCDYxERsBBgMCBBMUDodcAwwLmz+BKJZwDYlKBIpiZ4cJA5N0gVOLCoMdgWaCXw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,695,1336348800"; d="scan'208";a="107294594" Received: from rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com ([173.37.113.188]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 01 Aug 2012 16:52:54 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x12.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x12.cisco.com [173.36.12.86]) by rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q71Gqsel028153 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 16:52:54 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.162]) by xhc-aln-x12.cisco.com ([173.36.12.86]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 11:52:53 -0500 From: "Giles Heron (giheron)" To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: FW: Need volunteers for the NomCom Thread-Topic: Need volunteers for the NomCom Thread-Index: AQHNbnHM6YIYgxaVBUWAGSoxRUvEk5dFk96A Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 16:52:53 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20120730032233.17770.35790.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616 x-originating-ip: [10.55.81.249] x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19076.004 x-tm-as-result: No--27.500700-8.000000-31 x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <8065C0C6F44D854592BF88F79B0EB094@cisco.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:52:55 -0000 Please consider volunteering for NomCom... See you all (or those of you who are here in Vancouver) at 1pm today. Giles On 30/07/2012 04:22, "NomCom Chair" wrote: >We are currently looking for volunteers to serve on the 2012-2013 NomCom. >As you know, the success of the NomCom process depends crucially on >having a large pool of volunteers from throughout the IETF community. >In particular, it is valuable for the pool of volunteers to have strong >representation from all of the technical areas within the IETF. > >I understand that not all IETF participants read the IETF announce list >frequently. Therefore, if you would be willing to inform active >participants=20 >in your working groups about this year's call for NomCom volunteers, I >would greatly appreciate it. > >The NomCom 2012-2013 Call for Volunteers is open until this Sunday, >August 5. Details can be found at: >https://datatracker.ietf.org/ann/nomcom/49851/ > >Thank you for your help, >- Matt Lepinski > mlepinski.ietf@gmail.com > nomcom-chair@ietf.org From nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com Mon Aug 13 05:46:57 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2782921F8703 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 05:46:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.018 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.018 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.580, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UKxoaRqQVtIx for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 05:46:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fldsmtpe02.verizon.com (fldsmtpe02.verizon.com [140.108.26.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F70121F86F9 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 05:46:56 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: false Received: from unknown (HELO fldsmtpi02.verizon.com) ([166.68.71.144]) by fldsmtpe02.verizon.com with ESMTP; 13 Aug 2012 12:46:55 +0000 From: "Bitar, Nabil N" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,759,1336348800"; d="scan'208,217";a="315267521" Received: from fldp1lumxc7hb05.verizon.com (HELO FLDP1LUMXC7HB05.us.one.verizon.com) ([166.68.75.87]) by fldsmtpi02.verizon.com with ESMTP; 13 Aug 2012 12:46:54 +0000 Received: from fldp1lumxc7v63.us.one.verizon.com ([169.254.3.71]) by FLDP1LUMXC7HB05.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.75.87]) with mapi; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 08:46:54 -0400 To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 08:46:54 -0400 Subject: [l2vpn] WG Last Call for updates in draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-11.txt Thread-Topic: [l2vpn] WG Last Call for updates in draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-11.txt Thread-Index: Ac15UbdyS6IUQ32YRI6gcQm/m+/DPA== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.10.0.110310 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CC4DD0224CCABnabilnbitarverizoncom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Rahul Aggarwal , Giles Heron , "y.kamite@ntt.com" , 'Yakov Rekhter' X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 12:46:57 -0000 --_000_CC4DD0224CCABnabilnbitarverizoncom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Following the working group last call on draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-08.txt= , there were some updates made to the draft to add more clarity in few are= as in addition to few edits addressing comments.The draft was updated befor= e the Vancouver IETF, and we wanted to issue this call immediately after th= e Vancouver IETF meeting. This WG LC is focusing on changes only in - 09 version from 08. Draft version 09 can be found at http://tools.ietf.or= g/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-09 and the changes from version 08 can b= e found by clicking on diff1. - 11 version from 10. Draft version 11 can be found at http://= tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-11 and the changes from ver= sion 10 can be found by clicking on diff1. Please note that version 10 was simply a refresh of version 9. This last call will end on Monday August 20, 2012. Please, send your commen= ts to the L2VPN WG email list. Thanks, Nabil & Giles --_000_CC4DD0224CCABnabilnbitarverizoncom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
Following the working group last call on draft= -ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-08.txt , there were some updates made to the dr= aft to add more clarity in few areas in addition to few edits addressing co= mments.The draft was updated before the Vancouver IETF, and we wanted to is= sue this call immediately after the Vancouver IETF meeting.
&nb= sp;            This WG LC is focusing on chan= ges only in
- 09 version from 08. Draft version 09 can be found at <= a href=3D"http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-09">http:/= /tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-09 and the changes from version 08 can be found by= clicking on diff1.
   = ;          - 11 version from 10. Draft version 11 = can be found at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-11&nb= sp;and the changes from version 10 can be found by clicking on diff1.
=

Please note that version 10 was simply a refresh of version 9.

This last call will end on Monday August 20, 2012. Please, send your commen= ts to the L2VPN WG email list.

Thanks,
Nabil & Giles

 --_000_CC4DD0224CCABnabilnbitarverizoncom_-- From giles.heron@gmail.com Tue Aug 21 04:31:28 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47DCF21F86C5 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 04:31:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q7O4z7Uhyqx9 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 04:31:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ee0-f44.google.com (mail-ee0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7606421F8628 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 04:31:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by eekb45 with SMTP id b45so1958382eek.31 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 04:31:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :cc:to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=PS3h2mysY5a1/kVNmigwpytpT9vqe6kGbDK0S3djdYU=; b=raPou/QPTdYQZFZIV+fLyrkqdDPyNGLPxqM1f5vxnTMFraKYM5yqrAnZ52Lt6g2Cp9 BrR4YPHqDU88G30xDHGBRRx4n2P3KMLyQ2F/fQNpqPr32dVA9eot/R7iPg7D0HMzaHHN o6duvuK9Kr0cX+RLQoINQVHEC0UrmyagH3HGzRkfzXcwQfuK/lAI0+TG2zy4a/u6ctw8 jUFyvvaXdTWo8MsGULGlP4CxRetcOq6CfHwQtiPITFkWxnztB+FG08cLYcqVbByHOZGW 03npO+QjklSVLz339HwbQ68xPAz3FICoZO5JslSxezKgs1Njr/NRrcqpUuLIy/tUhRhL ElUQ== Received: by 10.14.5.67 with SMTP id 43mr12903694eek.15.1345548686511; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 04:31:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dhcp-144-254-149-70.cisco.com (dhcp-144-254-149-70.cisco.com. [144.254.149.70]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v3sm3575881eep.10.2012.08.21.04.31.24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 21 Aug 2012 04:31:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Giles Heron Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: L2VPN minutes Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 12:31:32 +0100 Message-Id: <0C2A2E64-89D2-4D1A-B09D-7CDCFCA1942B@gmail.com> To: l2vpn@ietf.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) Cc: Andrew McLachlan X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 11:31:28 -0000 Hi all I've posted the draft L2VPN minutes from Vancouver: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/84/minutes/minutes-84-l2vpn thanks to Drew for taking these. please do send any corrections to me and I'll amend and re-post. Giles From giles.heron@gmail.com Thu Aug 23 09:04:00 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB98D21F84B2 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:04:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.425 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.425 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.175, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vKJMsNwKsJ0N for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:04:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com (mail-ey0-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F67221F8602 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:03:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by eaai11 with SMTP id i11so276995eaa.31 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:03:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :cc:to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=1vaVRzjgpCFBgBItVhJ1nuVpbAFQGxKlaMv+Mk1g86M=; b=zsZAoeK6dG4zGzn2S1vdhBsxUF1JUWQaUu8joXPkzNAfYRoV0lEKAlkyXMaUiR6gjE XUlVRObeFOAKUr4+jvJsGCeBbA8roVeDlFSzEHQrJ7FVSTBSUve6qYU6zDGvo6MsNkAl O5KrYG6zeI2zz5GN9J+5ySjMZsF+LZUhsZS8SUA7DDfWuLXuhZIGWATYWC4mkCoW5LXx YiOYT1tw8MBusOjxyNPoVfzi4QWVY00+b3ZPgRB0eoGZVQrrJ0vp6LT2e+fWgy7TpPTM pCuCBp4juONcGV7Z9TArWo9DuyIr7Q+GAElyCENy/Kxe834oYyHruLGNWvzwO7TgvXsK YYuQ== Received: by 10.14.224.4 with SMTP id w4mr2722277eep.21.1345737839135; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:03:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ams3-vpn-dhcp4591.cisco.com (64-103-25-233.cisco.com. [64.103.25.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 45sm22591491eed.17.2012.08.23.09.03.57 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:03:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Giles Heron Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:03:44 +0100 Message-Id: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com> To: l2vpn@ietf.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:04:00 -0000 This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-06 should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. We discussed adoption of this draft in Vancouver, and the consensus of = the room seemed to be to adopt it, but of course the list is where we = make decisions :) Note that we also discussed adoption of the other VPLS E-Tree drafts in = Vancouver and there was very little support. If multiple people email = me asking to adopt one or other of those drafts I'll poll that one also. Please review the draft and respond to the list by Thursday September = 6th with comments as to its suitability for WG adoption. Giles= From wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com Thu Aug 23 09:11:20 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04F2621F8611 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:11:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -9.548 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.548 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.701, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I+za4OGjm27J for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:11:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smail3.alcatel.fr (smail3.alcatel.fr [64.208.49.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6187421F85FC for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:11:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com [135.120.45.62]) by smail3.alcatel.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/ICT) with ESMTP id q7NG9uCM023965 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:11:09 +0200 Received: from FRMRSSXCHMBSB1.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.41]) by FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.62]) with mapi; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:10:46 +0200 From: "Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" To: Giles Heron , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:10:44 +0200 Subject: RE: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support Thread-Topic: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support Thread-Index: Ac2BSPTL+EsNSIVBSXKwyLzKpYvayQAAOD8g Message-ID: <14C7F4F06DB5814AB0DE29716C4F6D6702E186FB21@FRMRSSXCHMBSB1.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com> References: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com> Accept-Language: nl-NL, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: nl-NL, en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.69 on 155.132.188.83 X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:11:20 -0000 Support as co-author -----Original Message----- From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of G= iles Heron Sent: donderdag 23 augustus 2012 18:04 To: l2vpn@ietf.org Subject: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-06 should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. We discussed adoption of this draft in Vancouver, and the consensus of the = room seemed to be to adopt it, but of course the list is where we make deci= sions :) Note that we also discussed adoption of the other VPLS E-Tree drafts in Van= couver and there was very little support. If multiple people email me as= king to adopt one or other of those drafts I'll poll that one also. Please review the draft and respond to the list by Thursday September 6th w= ith comments as to its suitability for WG adoption. Giles From lucy.yong@huawei.com Thu Aug 23 09:23:24 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B723721F8522 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:23:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.426 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.426 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.173, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NC4FCYWD6eJd for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:23:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2435A21F848F for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:23:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfwdlp01-ep.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath) with ESMTP id AJW45272; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 08:23:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from DFWEML405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.102) by dfweml201-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.107) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:17:27 -0700 Received: from DFWEML505-MBX.china.huawei.com ([10.124.31.100]) by dfweml405-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.102]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:17:30 -0700 From: Lucy yong To: Giles Heron , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: RE: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support Thread-Topic: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support Thread-Index: AQHNgUkSznDLNgFPhk2n4T2sV2NY1JdnkvZg Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:17:30 +0000 Message-ID: <2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D44802361@dfweml505-mbx> References: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.47.155.0] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:23:24 -0000 Support! Lucy -----Original Message----- From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of G= iles Heron Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 11:04 AM To: l2vpn@ietf.org Subject: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-06 should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. We discussed adoption of this draft in Vancouver, and the consensus of the = room seemed to be to adopt it, but of course the list is where we make deci= sions :) Note that we also discussed adoption of the other VPLS E-Tree drafts in Van= couver and there was very little support. If multiple people email me as= king to adopt one or other of those drafts I'll poll that one also. Please review the draft and respond to the list by Thursday September 6th w= ith comments as to its suitability for WG adoption. Giles From william.zayas@fibercrossing.net Thu Aug 23 10:10:38 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FB0821F85B8 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:10:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.739 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.739 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VEVUjoFtM1Ym for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:10:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from omr13.networksolutionsemail.com (omr13.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.63]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7203521F857A for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:10:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cm-omr10 (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50]) by omr13.networksolutionsemail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q7NHAaJN024802 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:10:36 -0400 Authentication-Results: cm-omr10 smtp.user=william.zayas@fibercrossing.net; auth=pass (LOGIN) X-Authenticated-UID: william.zayas@fibercrossing.net Received: from [76.110.101.202] ([76.110.101.202:3302] helo=your3b7c6e1c8e) by cm-omr10 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.41 r(31179/31189)) with ESMTPA id F7/C6-26049-C0466305; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:10:36 -0400 Message-ID: <9A5F76118A2A46D9B181A0C2FAD5B689@your3b7c6e1c8e> From: "William Zayas" To: "Giles Heron" , References: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com> Subject: Re: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:10:35 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: William Zayas List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:10:38 -0000 Support..:) William ----- Original Message ----- From: "Giles Heron" To: Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 12:03 PM Subject: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-06 should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. We discussed adoption of this draft in Vancouver, and the consensus of the room seemed to be to adopt it, but of course the list is where we make decisions :) Note that we also discussed adoption of the other VPLS E-Tree drafts in Vancouver and there was very little support. If multiple people email me asking to adopt one or other of those drafts I'll poll that one also. Please review the draft and respond to the list by Thursday September 6th with comments as to its suitability for WG adoption. Giles From paul@unbehagen.net Thu Aug 23 11:01:06 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53BAE21F861F for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 11:01:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.995 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.995 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.208, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5e--pRr2EHPk for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 11:01:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ECC621F860E for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 11:01:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by iabz21 with SMTP id z21so1910342iab.31 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 11:01:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date:to :x-gm-message-state; bh=RrWrD+ZH6Z0SbpqXhoYIApLzDL6WgS9za1rKXYggCTI=; b=c5rbdln9Jgu7gQpG7nkoQc+b6C7zTfddIgU+VhAWlzm5h5ogSUpdwzJmHC/Ry+ZVda CHLqvCox1GP39Qi0J9IdeQY83aKtoMmKz61Sd2ym+6znnCFzvW2xOabDQsJb1TQmRV76 iCV59pICDUkfYRu4hKAYXCmUo49FE091RMSZWFiBLY7CNE5BWNCC8g3HqX2+ZZ2YSYcY 081AkRyFcz6veS5s6P2bGgDVGwZFqk5O0XeQfL0oo/mB+UzbpOwWCHhwbD8BsMtTkIvQ BmVkGT/rRf8WNj2V/mG/GddvXraeo992/28f9jlRYyQB+LZzvS/wfJMYhSQX4W4QVFbo PGbg== Received: by 10.50.190.170 with SMTP id gr10mr6962203igc.29.1345744864424; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 11:01:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.7] (c-67-161-144-217.hsd1.co.comcast.net. [67.161.144.217]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ua2sm233484igb.7.2012.08.23.11.01.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 23 Aug 2012 11:01:03 -0700 (PDT) References: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <2358EED0-CB19-4DB2-837D-790551C9A606@unbehagen.net> X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9B206) From: Paul Unbehagen Subject: Re: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 12:01:00 -0600 To: Giles Heron X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk6sB0ZCXdi40PuIXA/vc5HHZW/+5fyMMb3188aaxM2LZNdjTtLNM2HKb1j0mauWoHVdMLC Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:01:06 -0000 Support -- Paul Unbehagen On Aug 23, 2012, at 10:03 AM, Giles Heron wrote: > This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: >=20 > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-06 >=20 > should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. >=20 > We discussed adoption of this draft in Vancouver, and the consensus of the= room seemed to be to adopt it, but of course the list is where we make deci= sions :) >=20 > Note that we also discussed adoption of the other VPLS E-Tree drafts in Va= ncouver and there was very little support. If multiple people email me as= king to adopt one or other of those drafts I'll poll that one also. >=20 > Please review the draft and respond to the list by Thursday September 6th w= ith comments as to its suitability for WG adoption. >=20 > Giles From pranjal.dutta@alcatel-lucent.com Thu Aug 23 17:16:09 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F0D21F861F for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:16:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -7.493 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.493 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.894, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qLJOrQ18X7hx for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:16:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ihemail4.lucent.com (ihemail4.lucent.com [135.245.0.39]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2C221F8564 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:16:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from inbansmailrelay2.in.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-250-11-33.lucent.com [135.250.11.33]) by ihemail4.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id q7O0G3Y4003709 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 23 Aug 2012 19:16:06 -0500 (CDT) Received: from INBANSXCHHUB03.in.alcatel-lucent.com (inbansxchhub03.in.alcatel-lucent.com [135.250.12.80]) by inbansmailrelay2.in.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id q7O0G2bj023823 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 24 Aug 2012 05:46:03 +0530 Received: from INBANSXCHMBSA3.in.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.250.12.50]) by INBANSXCHHUB03.in.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.250.12.80]) with mapi; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 05:46:02 +0530 From: "Dutta, Pranjal K (Pranjal)" To: Giles Heron , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 05:46:01 +0530 Subject: RE: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support Thread-Topic: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support Thread-Index: Ac2BSOySqFnTH9rqRUuMvg0pvRsQCAARLB0Q Message-ID: References: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.39 X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:16:09 -0000 Support. Thanks, Pranjal -----Original Message----- From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of G= iles Heron Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 9:04 AM To: l2vpn@ietf.org Subject: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-06 should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. We discussed adoption of this draft in Vancouver, and the consensus of the = room seemed to be to adopt it, but of course the list is where we make deci= sions :) Note that we also discussed adoption of the other VPLS E-Tree drafts in Van= couver and there was very little support. If multiple people email me as= king to adopt one or other of those drafts I'll poll that one also. Please review the draft and respond to the list by Thursday September 6th w= ith comments as to its suitability for WG adoption. Giles From jiangyuanlong@huawei.com Thu Aug 23 23:23:16 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4451811E80CC for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 23:23:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.449 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id atlFzcSOeRCW for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 23:23:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A2B511E80A5 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 23:23:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfweml201-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath) with ESMTP id AJT01794; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 22:23:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from DFWEML407-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.132) by dfweml201-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.107) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 23:15:10 -0700 Received: from SZXEML437-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.72.61.72) by dfweml407-hub.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.132) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 23:15:16 -0700 Received: from SZXEML546-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.239]) by szxeml437-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.72.61.72]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:15:10 +0800 From: Jiangyuanlong To: Giles Heron , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: RE: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support Thread-Topic: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support Thread-Index: AQHNgb/Qd1XAFCXgCU2J+3IFG1iJTA== Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 06:15:09 +0000 Message-ID: <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68B1D444C30@szxeml546-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.66.77.95] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 06:23:16 -0000 Support as a co-author. Regards, Yuanlong ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:03:44 +0100 From: Giles Heron To: l2vpn@ietf.org Subject: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support Message-ID: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dus-ascii This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-06 should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. We discussed adoption of this draft in Vancouver, and the consensus of the = room seemed to be to adopt it, but of course the list is where we make deci= sions :) Note that we also discussed adoption of the other VPLS E-Tree drafts in Van= couver and there was very little support. If multiple people email me as= king to adopt one or other of those drafts I'll poll that one also. Please review the draft and respond to the list by Thursday September 6th w= ith comments as to its suitability for WG adoption. Giles From Manuel.Paul@telekom.de Fri Aug 24 00:03:57 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D9B921F8668 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:03:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.249 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ETTTKmH2wBzU for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:03:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tcmail83.telekom.de (tcmail83.telekom.de [62.225.183.131]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F8A421F8667 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:03:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from he101251.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.125.92.154]) by tcmail81.telekom.de with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 24 Aug 2012 09:03:49 +0200 Received: from HE101452.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.125.92.148]) by HE101251.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([fe80::e428:2144:dcc5:bcce%15]) with mapi; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:03:47 +0200 From: To: , Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:03:47 +0200 Subject: RE: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support Thread-Topic: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support Thread-Index: Ac2BSO/+3JxfeMBTQ8SIrG7j0Y90UQAB91+g Message-ID: <9435EDACD941174099E143BCA2BCD615FAC4C615E8@HE101452.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> References: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com> Accept-Language: de-DE Content-Language: de-DE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: de-DE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 07:03:57 -0000 U3VwcG9ydCENCihhcyBhIGNvLWF1dGhvcikNCg0KVGhhbmtzDQpNYW51ZWwNCg0KPiAtLS0tLU9y aWdpbmFsIE1lc3NhZ2UtLS0tLQ0KPiBGcm9tOiBsMnZwbi1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnIFttYWls dG86bDJ2cG4tYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZ10gT24gQmVoYWxmIE9mDQo+IEdpbGVzIEhlcm9uDQo+ IFNlbnQ6IFRodXJzZGF5LCBBdWd1c3QgMjMsIDIwMTIgNjowNCBQTQ0KPiBUbzogbDJ2cG5AaWV0 Zi5vcmcNCj4gU3ViamVjdDogV0cgYWRvcHRpb24gY2FsbCBmb3IgVlBMUyBQRSBNb2RlbCBmb3Ig RS1UcmVlIFN1cHBvcnQNCj4NCj4gVGhpcyBpcyBhIHJlcXVlc3QgdG8gZ2F1Z2UgY29uc2Vuc3Vz IGFzIHRvIHdoZXRoZXI6DQo+DQo+IGh0dHA6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0LWpp YW5nLWwydnBuLXZwbHMtcGUtZXRyZWUtMDYNCj4NCj4gc2hvdWxkIGJlIGFjY2VwdGVkIGFzIGFu IEwyVlBOIFdHIGRyYWZ0Lg0KPg0KPiBXZSBkaXNjdXNzZWQgYWRvcHRpb24gb2YgdGhpcyBkcmFm dCBpbiBWYW5jb3V2ZXIsIGFuZCB0aGUgY29uc2Vuc3VzIG9mIHRoZQ0KPiByb29tIHNlZW1lZCB0 byBiZSB0byBhZG9wdCBpdCwgYnV0IG9mIGNvdXJzZSB0aGUgbGlzdCBpcyB3aGVyZSB3ZSBtYWtl DQo+IGRlY2lzaW9ucyA6KQ0KPg0KPiBOb3RlIHRoYXQgd2UgYWxzbyBkaXNjdXNzZWQgYWRvcHRp b24gb2YgdGhlIG90aGVyIFZQTFMgRS1UcmVlIGRyYWZ0cyBpbg0KPiBWYW5jb3V2ZXIgYW5kIHRo ZXJlIHdhcyB2ZXJ5IGxpdHRsZSBzdXBwb3J0LiAgICBJZiBtdWx0aXBsZSBwZW9wbGUgZW1haWwN Cj4gbWUgYXNraW5nIHRvIGFkb3B0IG9uZSBvciBvdGhlciBvZiB0aG9zZSBkcmFmdHMgSSdsbCBw b2xsIHRoYXQgb25lIGFsc28uDQo+DQo+IFBsZWFzZSByZXZpZXcgdGhlIGRyYWZ0IGFuZCByZXNw b25kIHRvIHRoZSBsaXN0IGJ5IFRodXJzZGF5IFNlcHRlbWJlciA2dGgNCj4gd2l0aCBjb21tZW50 cyBhcyB0byBpdHMgc3VpdGFiaWxpdHkgZm9yIFdHIGFkb3B0aW9uLg0KPg0KPiBHaWxlcw0K From mach.chen@huawei.com Fri Aug 24 00:37:14 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7B2C21F86B7 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:37:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.955 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.955 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.833, BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_SUB_ENC_GB2312=1.345] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fVhj8DFsLoS3 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:37:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9961F21F86B1 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:37:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfwdlp03-ep.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath) with ESMTP id AJV00270; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 23:37:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from DFWEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.203) by dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:32:14 -0700 Received: from SZXEML437-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.72.61.72) by dfweml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:32:12 -0700 Received: from SZXEML511-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.129]) by szxeml437-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.72.61.72]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 15:32:06 +0800 From: Mach Chen To: Giles Heron , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: =?gb2312?B?tPC4tDogV0cgYWRvcHRpb24gY2FsbCBmb3IgVlBMUyBQRSBNb2RlbCBmb3Ig?= =?gb2312?Q?E-Tree_Support?= Thread-Topic: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support Thread-Index: AQHNgUj5odqd/j5Pg064Ry+GjT/RVJdoknqQ Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 07:32:05 +0000 Message-ID: References: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.96.190] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 07:37:14 -0000 U3VwcG9ydC4NCg0KQmVzdCByZWdhcmRzLA0KTWFjaA0KDQo+IC0tLS0t08q8/tStvP4tLS0tLQ0K PiC3orz+yMs6IGwydnBuLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmcgW21haWx0bzpsMnZwbi1ib3VuY2VzQGll dGYub3JnXSC0+rHtIEdpbGVzDQo+IEhlcm9uDQo+ILeiy83KsbzkOiAyMDEyxOo41MIyNMjVIDA6 MDQNCj4gytW8/sjLOiBsMnZwbkBpZXRmLm9yZw0KPiDW98ziOiBXRyBhZG9wdGlvbiBjYWxsIGZv ciBWUExTIFBFIE1vZGVsIGZvciBFLVRyZWUgU3VwcG9ydA0KPiANCj4gVGhpcyBpcyBhIHJlcXVl c3QgdG8gZ2F1Z2UgY29uc2Vuc3VzIGFzIHRvIHdoZXRoZXI6DQo+IA0KPiBodHRwOi8vdG9vbHMu aWV0Zi5vcmcvaHRtbC9kcmFmdC1qaWFuZy1sMnZwbi12cGxzLXBlLWV0cmVlLTA2DQo+IA0KPiBz aG91bGQgYmUgYWNjZXB0ZWQgYXMgYW4gTDJWUE4gV0cgZHJhZnQuDQo+IA0KPiBXZSBkaXNjdXNz ZWQgYWRvcHRpb24gb2YgdGhpcyBkcmFmdCBpbiBWYW5jb3V2ZXIsIGFuZCB0aGUgY29uc2Vuc3Vz IG9mIHRoZQ0KPiByb29tIHNlZW1lZCB0byBiZSB0byBhZG9wdCBpdCwgYnV0IG9mIGNvdXJzZSB0 aGUgbGlzdCBpcyB3aGVyZSB3ZSBtYWtlDQo+IGRlY2lzaW9ucyA6KQ0KPiANCj4gTm90ZSB0aGF0 IHdlIGFsc28gZGlzY3Vzc2VkIGFkb3B0aW9uIG9mIHRoZSBvdGhlciBWUExTIEUtVHJlZSBkcmFm dHMgaW4NCj4gVmFuY291dmVyIGFuZCB0aGVyZSB3YXMgdmVyeSBsaXR0bGUgc3VwcG9ydC4gICAg SWYgbXVsdGlwbGUgcGVvcGxlIGVtYWlsIG1lDQo+IGFza2luZyB0byBhZG9wdCBvbmUgb3Igb3Ro ZXIgb2YgdGhvc2UgZHJhZnRzIEknbGwgcG9sbCB0aGF0IG9uZSBhbHNvLg0KPiANCj4gUGxlYXNl IHJldmlldyB0aGUgZHJhZnQgYW5kIHJlc3BvbmQgdG8gdGhlIGxpc3QgYnkgVGh1cnNkYXkgU2Vw dGVtYmVyIDZ0aCB3aXRoDQo+IGNvbW1lbnRzIGFzIHRvIGl0cyBzdWl0YWJpbGl0eSBmb3IgV0cg YWRvcHRpb24uDQo+IA0KPiBHaWxlcw0K From Frederic.Jounay@orange.ch Fri Aug 24 04:41:10 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 237F721F86C3 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 04:41:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.299 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xz0W7KAyPM4z for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 04:41:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp10.eds.ch (smtp10.eds.ch [195.160.148.39]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 255C721F8613 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 04:41:08 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: c3a09427-b7f556d000001bcb-c6-50376853c46e Received: from chcrochs054.orange.ch (Unknown_Domain [204.104.149.84]) (using TLS with cipher RC4-MD5 (RC4-MD5/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by smtp10.eds.ch () with SMTP id DF.68.07115.35867305; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 13:41:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from CHCROCHC051.orange.ch ([fe80:0000:0000:0000:704b:3a68:12.14.247.83]) by chcrochs054.orange.ch ([172.19.166.54]) with mapi; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 13:41:07 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jounay_Fr=E9d=E9ric?= To: Giles Heron , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 13:41:06 +0200 Subject: RE: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support Thread-Topic: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support Thread-Index: Ac2BUjy/QdVeNWUuTwaI2Gcj9chquwAmwqDA Message-ID: <78046FD1C8FE0345AFBC11640A8DF6E2017F387F4901@CHCROCHC051.orange.ch> References: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com> <9A5F76118A2A46D9B181A0C2FAD5B689@your3b7c6e1c8e> In-Reply-To: <9A5F76118A2A46D9B181A0C2FAD5B689@your3b7c6e1c8e> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrELMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVyJmNqiG5whnmAwaKllhZPj85gtHj87RC7 A5PHzll32T2WLPnJFMAUxWWTkpqTWZZapG+XwJUxd+ZPxoJj7BUnZ61jbGBsYuti5OSQEDCR aNkwjwXCFpO4cG89UJyDQ0ighUnicWIXIxeQuZZR4taZ6ewgNWwCbhJLrkxlArFFBLwkbv6/ xwhiswioSny79hjMFhZwkmhZ8JkdosZZ4lLzBBaQmSICRhKtk9xAwrwCARKz964HWyskUCCx 4swkMJtTwE7ixe8tYKcxAp3z/dQasFXMAuISt57MZ4I4U0BiyZ7zzBC2qMTLx/9YIepFJe60 r2eEqNeTuDF1ChuErS2xbOFrZoi9ghInZz5hmcAoOgvJ2FlIWmYhaZmFpGUBI8sqRt7i3JIC QwO91JRiveSMTYzAmDi8YIr6DsbpF8wPMQpwMCrx8B7oNgsQYk0sK67MPcQowcGsJMIr4Gce IMSbklhZlVqUH19UmpNafIhRmoNFSZz3ZDBfgJBAemJJanZqakFqEUyWiYNTqoGRL1KH814f f9KeCLd+n419e3ZISq5NfPvj9bUJSnVZZSn5UX3loqpTNS5O2DRt+uQTCnUW5ixvk1LtVvn/ VYu/9u4bf3dr0+HOIpG1GctuWvQemHDptYbc7lf36oP4l3B/+6LqHmBWapN2p7J/z2KFxaIH ey6d32CxL7pfa/OSTbcX9fJwc/5VYinOSDTUYi4qTgQAu0zsjoUCAAA= X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 11:41:10 -0000 Hi, Support (as co-author) Fred ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Giles Heron" To: Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 12:03 PM Subject: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-06 should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. We discussed adoption of this draft in Vancouver, and the consensus of the= =20 room seemed to be to adopt it, but of course the list is where we make=20 decisions :) Note that we also discussed adoption of the other VPLS E-Tree drafts in=20 Vancouver and there was very little support. If multiple people email me= =20 asking to adopt one or other of those drafts I'll poll that one also. Please review the draft and respond to the list by Thursday September 6th=20 with comments as to its suitability for WG adoption. Giles=20 From roberto.fragassi@alcatel-lucent.com Fri Aug 24 04:45:04 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCF7121F8709 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 04:45:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.249 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jN9hMNd5eChk for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 04:45:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smail2.alcatel.fr (smail2.alcatel.fr [64.208.49.57]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B7D21F8683 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 04:45:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from FRMRSSXCHHUB01.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (FRMRSSXCHHUB01.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com [135.120.45.61]) by smail2.alcatel.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/ICT) with ESMTP id q7OBg2tn014242 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 24 Aug 2012 13:44:59 +0200 Received: from US70TWXCHHUB03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (135.5.2.35) by FRMRSSXCHHUB01.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (135.120.45.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 13:44:50 +0200 Received: from US70TWXCHMBA07.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.1.112]) by US70TWXCHHUB03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.5.2.35]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 07:44:47 -0400 From: "Fragassi, Roberto (Roberto)" To: Giles Heron , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: RE: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support Thread-Topic: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support Thread-Index: AQHNgUka1LCLK3DqD0m710kOuOF+jZdo2QRw Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 11:44:44 +0000 Message-ID: References: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.5.27.17] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.69 on 155.132.188.80 X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 11:45:05 -0000 Support -----Original Message----- From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of G= iles Heron Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 12:04 PM To: l2vpn@ietf.org Subject: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-06 should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. We discussed adoption of this draft in Vancouver, and the consensus of the = room seemed to be to adopt it, but of course the list is where we make deci= sions :) Note that we also discussed adoption of the other VPLS E-Tree drafts in Van= couver and there was very little support. If multiple people email me as= king to adopt one or other of those drafts I'll poll that one also. Please review the draft and respond to the list by Thursday September 6th w= ith comments as to its suitability for WG adoption. Giles From nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com Fri Aug 24 06:58:57 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35DF321F8686 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 06:58:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.079 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.079 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.519, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zgWoZe0CqpQj for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 06:58:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fldsmtpe02.verizon.com (fldsmtpe02.verizon.com [140.108.26.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C18B21F868A for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 06:58:55 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: false Received: from unknown (HELO fldsmtpi02.verizon.com) ([166.68.71.144]) by fldsmtpe02.verizon.com with ESMTP; 24 Aug 2012 13:58:54 +0000 From: "Bitar, Nabil N" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,304,1344211200"; d="scan'208,217";a="321595942" Received: from fldp1lumxc7hb04.verizon.com (HELO FLDP1LUMXC7HB04.us.one.verizon.com) ([166.68.75.83]) by fldsmtpi02.verizon.com with ESMTP; 24 Aug 2012 13:58:54 +0000 Received: from fldp1lumxc7v63.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.45.45]) by FLDP1LUMXC7HB04.us.one.verizon.com ([166.68.75.83]) with mapi; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:58:54 -0400 To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:58:56 -0400 Subject: Re: [l2vpn] WG Last Call for updates in draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-11.txt Thread-Topic: [l2vpn] WG Last Call for updates in draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-11.txt Thread-Index: Ac2CAJhRhmr4K0xRS8Og+kJz1hSdCQ== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.10.0.110310 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CC5D00354E960nabilnbitarverizoncom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Rahul Aggarwal , 'Yakov Rekhter' , Giles Heron , "y.kamite@ntt.com" X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 13:58:57 -0000 --_000_CC5D00354E960nabilnbitarverizoncom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, This call passed as there were no comments received pertaining to the chang= es mentioned. We will proceed with the draft. Thanks, Nabil From: Nabil Bitar > Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 08:46:54 -0400 To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" > Cc: Rahul Aggarwal >, Gil= es Heron >, "y.kamite@ntt.com" >, 'Yako= v Rekhter' > Subject: [l2vpn] WG Last Call for updates in draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-11= .txt Hi, Following the working group last call on draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-08.txt= , there were some updates made to the draft to add more clarity in few are= as in addition to few edits addressing comments.The draft was updated befor= e the Vancouver IETF, and we wanted to issue this call immediately after th= e Vancouver IETF meeting. This WG LC is focusing on changes only in - 09 version from 08. Draft version 09 can be found at http://tools.ietf.or= g/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-09 and the changes from version 08 can b= e found by clicking on diff1. - 11 version from 10. Draft version 11 can be found at http://= tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-11 and the changes from ver= sion 10 can be found by clicking on diff1. Please note that version 10 was simply a refresh of version 9. This last call will end on Monday August 20, 2012. Please, send your commen= ts to the L2VPN WG email list. Thanks, Nabil & Giles --_000_CC5D00354E960nabilnbitarverizoncom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
This call = passed as there were no comments received pertaining to the changes mention= ed. We will proceed with the draft.

Thanks,
<= div>Nabil

From: = Nabil Bitar <nabil.= n.bitar@verizon.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 08:46:54 -0400
To: = "l2vpn@ietf.org" <l2vpn@ietf.org>
Cc: Rahul Aggarwal <raggarwa_1@yahoo.com>, Giles Heron <giheron@cisco.com>, "y.kamite@ntt.com" <y.kamite@= ntt.com>, 'Yakov Rekhter' <y= akov@juniper.net>
Subject: [l2vpn] WG Last Call for updates in draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-11.txt

Hi,
Following the working group last call = on draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-08.txt , there were some updates made t= o the draft to add more clarity in few areas in addition to few edits addre= ssing comments.The draft was updated before the Vancouver IETF, and we want= ed to issue this call immediately after the Vancouver IETF meeting.<= /font>
- 09 version from 08. Draft version 09 can be found at&= nbsp;= http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-09 <= span class=3D"Apple-style-span" style=3D"font-size: 15px; font-family: Cali= bri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial; ">and the changes from version 08 can be fo= und by clicking on diff1.


This last call will end on Monday August 20, 2012. Please, send your commen= ts to the L2VPN WG email list.

Thanks,
Nabil & Giles

--_000_CC5D00354E960nabilnbitarverizoncom_-- From bedard.phil@gmail.com Fri Aug 24 07:44:21 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A894721F8471 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 07:44:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rRX69WJgBsry for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 07:44:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29ED821F846A for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 07:44:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pbbrr4 with SMTP id rr4so3519343pbb.31 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 07:44:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id:thread-topic:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DgFkHinnddMkZV0dzK/xAtNUKbdlcAmglIs1XFz1GbI=; b=xarm2bTD4EcxRz42ZtsL2dsQ3brgd9XUj+ZRMdaHh0FEKSY4ineZvautiI3o7ygZ8U K8sR+hwzJ69xxr0gaBfO6lQENgcdjTPLfrPWrnNqFv0Yg4jIMJP1/7Vw6gRFEIh8H4aw VZCXt8DnwgoVuPrEsgU44mNCaI+r+hQvh36yxJgfqHqXxy2rU2V5E5vay6Q21EFA/Sww C/gye7BNTguiJVij6Hb3DBgnf/EQH+XaERX6Nt8+k/6nxXBigGqUy5PLZBn/kLVJBozD 8SiE+cDwRz7G45njjMSV7P92B7piY5b73mS5ebUpg+9+D4ajr+9bOiSg35IIMGiYv0+B OAvA== Received: by 10.66.81.202 with SMTP id c10mr10975561pay.31.1345819460873; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 07:44:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.5.218] (ip-64-134-191-169.public.wayport.net. [64.134.191.169]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ty1sm8419877pbc.76.2012.08.24.07.44.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 24 Aug 2012 07:44:19 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616 Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 10:44:14 -0400 Subject: Re: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support From: Phil Bedard To: Giles Heron , Message-ID: Thread-Topic: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support In-Reply-To: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:44:21 -0000 Support. On 8/23/12 12:03 PM, "Giles Heron" wrote: >This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: > >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-06 > >should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. > >We discussed adoption of this draft in Vancouver, and the consensus of >the room seemed to be to adopt it, but of course the list is where we >make decisions :) > >Note that we also discussed adoption of the other VPLS E-Tree drafts in >Vancouver and there was very little support. If multiple people email >me asking to adopt one or other of those drafts I'll poll that one also. > >Please review the draft and respond to the list by Thursday September 6th >with comments as to its suitability for WG adoption. > >Giles From linda.dunbar@huawei.com Fri Aug 24 08:23:56 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 920BA21F86AD for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:23:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.482 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.482 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.117, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bqh7gmAit99N for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:23:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E989E21F8683 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:23:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfwdlp01-ep.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath) with ESMTP id AKO01158; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 07:23:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from DFWEML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.131) by dfweml201-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.107) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:19:23 -0700 Received: from DFWEML505-MBX.china.huawei.com ([10.124.31.100]) by dfweml406-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.131]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:19:29 -0700 From: Linda Dunbar To: Giles Heron , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: RE: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support Thread-Topic: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support Thread-Index: AQHNgUkUTRxn7Q19wEiZx6DXD86EJ5dojg+AgACG/AA= Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 15:19:28 +0000 Message-ID: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F6450528CF@dfweml505-mbx> References: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.192.11.136] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 15:23:56 -0000 Support.=20 Linda Dunbar >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of Giles Heron > Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 9:04 AM > To: l2vpn@ietf.org > Subject: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support >=20 > This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: >=20 > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-06 >=20 > should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. >=20 > We discussed adoption of this draft in Vancouver, and the consensus of > the room seemed to be to adopt it, but of course the list is where we > make decisions :) >=20 > Note that we also discussed adoption of the other VPLS E-Tree drafts in > Vancouver and there was very little support. If multiple people > email me asking to adopt one or other of those drafts I'll poll that > one also. >=20 > Please review the draft and respond to the list by Thursday September > 6th with comments as to its suitability for WG adoption. >=20 > Giles From xizhang@juniper.net Fri Aug 24 09:41:26 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1360021F86C2 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:41:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YiBPP4mJD+hT for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:41:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exprod7og104.obsmtp.com (exprod7og104.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51E5121F86B9 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:41:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob104.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUDeusnTgXXP4vnsVOcSwhVtC2GP3b2D4@postini.com; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:41:25 PDT Received: from EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::c821:7c81:f21f:8bc7]) by P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::fc92:eb1:759:2c72%11]) with mapi; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:41:21 -0700 From: "Xiangyang (Victor) Zhang" To: Giles Heron , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:41:20 -0700 Subject: RE: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support Thread-Topic: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support Thread-Index: Ac2BSOrOrKhC1qwCTzW+FpYGh6zNJQAzkRsQ Message-ID: <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB333163A63248A041@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net> References: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:41:26 -0000 Support. Regards, Victor -----Original Message----- From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of G= iles Heron Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 9:04 AM To: l2vpn@ietf.org Subject: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-06 should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. We discussed adoption of this draft in Vancouver, and the consensus of the = room seemed to be to adopt it, but of course the list is where we make deci= sions :) Note that we also discussed adoption of the other VPLS E-Tree drafts in Van= couver and there was very little support. If multiple people email me as= king to adopt one or other of those drafts I'll poll that one also. Please review the draft and respond to the list by Thursday September 6th w= ith comments as to its suitability for WG adoption. Giles From jie.dong@huawei.com Fri Aug 24 21:51:50 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9019621F8568 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 21:51:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.447 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.447 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.152, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MZFdOaGWddZH for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 21:51:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 678A121F856F for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 21:51:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath) with ESMTP id ALJ00415; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 20:51:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from DFWEML408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.134) by dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 21:46:26 -0700 Received: from SZXEML427-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.72.61.35) by dfweml408-hub.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.134) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 21:46:23 -0700 Received: from SZXEML504-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.206]) by szxeml427-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.72.61.35]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 12:46:19 +0800 From: Jie Dong To: Giles Heron , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: RE: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support Thread-Topic: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support Thread-Index: AQHNgUkQRt3ujFZihku8g8orYTibepdp9ntw Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 04:46:18 +0000 Message-ID: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92732562618@szxeml504-mbs.china.huawei.com> References: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.96.187] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 04:51:50 -0000 Support. -Jie > -----Original Message----- > From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Giles Heron > Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 12:04 AM > To: l2vpn@ietf.org > Subject: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support >=20 > This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: >=20 > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-06 >=20 > should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. >=20 > We discussed adoption of this draft in Vancouver, and the consensus of th= e > room seemed to be to adopt it, but of course the list is where we make > decisions :) >=20 > Note that we also discussed adoption of the other VPLS E-Tree drafts in > Vancouver and there was very little support. If multiple people email = me > asking to adopt one or other of those drafts I'll poll that one also. >=20 > Please review the draft and respond to the list by Thursday September 6th= with > comments as to its suitability for WG adoption. >=20 > Giles From raymond.key@hotmail.com Wed Aug 29 01:40:03 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E6DE21F8599 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 01:40:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.598 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bCLsQhIceKNi for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 01:40:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snt0-omc3-s32.snt0.hotmail.com (snt0-omc3-s32.snt0.hotmail.com [65.55.90.171]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A001A21F84DA for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 01:40:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SNT123-W8 ([65.55.90.136]) by snt0-omc3-s32.snt0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 29 Aug 2012 01:40:00 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_cab913cc-137a-46c5-a7fb-691ac6b5f2ae_" X-Originating-IP: [14.127.226.89] From: Raymond Key Sender: To: , Subject: RE: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:10:00 +1030 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com> References: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Aug 2012 08:40:00.0955 (UTC) FILETIME=[E0C128B0:01CD85C1] X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 08:40:03 -0000 --_cab913cc-137a-46c5-a7fb-691ac6b5f2ae_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Support > From: giles.heron@gmail.com > Subject: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support > Date: Thu=2C 23 Aug 2012 17:03:44 +0100 > To: l2vpn@ietf.org >=20 > This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: >=20 > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-06 >=20 > should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. >=20 > We discussed adoption of this draft in Vancouver=2C and the consensus of = the room seemed to be to adopt it=2C but of course the list is where we mak= e decisions :) >=20 > Note that we also discussed adoption of the other VPLS E-Tree drafts in V= ancouver and there was very little support. If multiple people email me = asking to adopt one or other of those drafts I'll poll that one also. >=20 > Please review the draft and respond to the list by Thursday September 6th= with comments as to its suitability for WG adoption. >=20 > Giles = --_cab913cc-137a-46c5-a7fb-691ac6b5f2ae_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Support
 =3B
>=3B Fr= om: giles.heron@gmail.com
>=3B Subject: WG adoption call for VPLS PE M= odel for E-Tree Support
>=3B Date: Thu=2C 23 Aug 2012 17:03:44 +0100>=3B To: l2vpn@ietf.org
>=3B
>=3B This is a request to gauge= consensus as to whether:
>=3B
>=3B http://tools.ietf.org/html/d= raft-jiang-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-06
>=3B
>=3B should be accepted a= s an L2VPN WG draft.
>=3B
>=3B We discussed adoption of this dra= ft in Vancouver=2C and the consensus of the room seemed to be to adopt it= =2C but of course the list is where we make decisions :)
>=3B
>= =3B Note that we also discussed adoption of the other VPLS E-Tree drafts in= Vancouver and there was very little support. If multiple people email m= e asking to adopt one or other of those drafts I'll poll that one also.
= >=3B
>=3B Please review the draft and respond to the list by Thursd= ay September 6th with comments as to its suitability for WG adoption.
&g= t=3B
>=3B Giles
= --_cab913cc-137a-46c5-a7fb-691ac6b5f2ae_-- From agmalis@gmail.com Wed Aug 29 02:17:52 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEC3D21F849D for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 02:17:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.345 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.345 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.254, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ONh2Bf60MWK8 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 02:17:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D1D21F8498 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 02:17:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by iabz21 with SMTP id z21so791762iab.31 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 02:17:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=RuHsVBRAXP8JvTjEJgKhM00RV+luYQpqJJebODw5Ato=; b=J7G/gpe3L9EedGRoHIWn6TCH7YGHULefm4AtIjP4VibBa673FNN9X+pYJfMQP/FR7+ Wi4Hy3S9gzL9vOUw/oFxAWXKqD4q7Z5n3ABqoz8yIsYf2YsKvtCD3wvcg8AnCLMpChv7 c2eEBUpQYuCxlYUSGboEu3vI72A204LiN+qgZpbMNY66d6Qu/bd2YgQZIVmNByORTfUV 4pAH0K1lmfCHnNkHx4dCTEUM5Ilw5cf1aNItpE+3CEuL6dKdj1BbBHkSP/27z4EaueOu /9PxCIgHGOlHXVelGdaxqO9rs/9ipe5D0s+bP9TLWdDhzx68mlaFE0ewzvLwRyGTgtf/ 21ug== Received: by 10.50.36.169 with SMTP id r9mr898903igj.19.1346231871559; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 02:17:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.124.70 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 02:17:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com> References: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com> From: "Andrew G. Malis" Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 12:17:31 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support To: Giles Heron Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:17:53 -0000 Support. Cheers, Andy On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Giles Heron wrote: > This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-06 > > should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. > > We discussed adoption of this draft in Vancouver, and the consensus of the room seemed to be to adopt it, but of course the list is where we make decisions :) > > Note that we also discussed adoption of the other VPLS E-Tree drafts in Vancouver and there was very little support. If multiple people email me asking to adopt one or other of those drafts I'll poll that one also. > > Please review the draft and respond to the list by Thursday September 6th with comments as to its suitability for WG adoption. > > Giles From internet-drafts@ietf.org Wed Aug 29 14:37:13 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6421711E80FD; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:37:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.477 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.477 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.122, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id df-RXkV54q9u; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:37:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8CD511E80F1; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:37:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-vpls-pe-model-05.txt X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.34 Message-ID: <20120829213712.7610.10112.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:37:12 -0700 Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 21:37:13 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Working = Group of the IETF. Title : Extensions to VPLS PE model for Provider Backbone Bridgi= ng Author(s) : Florin Balus Matthew Bocci Ali Sajassi Nabil Bitar Raymond Zhang Filename : draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-vpls-pe-model-05.txt Pages : 14 Date : 2012-08-29 Abstract: IEEE 802.1ah standard [IEEE802.1ah], also known as Provider Backbone Bridges (PBB) defines an architecture and bridge protocols for interconnection of multiple Provider Bridge Networks (PBNs). PBB was defined in IEEE as a connectionless technology based on multipoint VLAN tunnels. MSTP is used as the core control plane for loop avoidance and load balancing. As a result, the coverage of the solution is limited by STP scale in the core of large service provider networks. PBB on the other hand can be used to attain better scalability in terms of number of customer MAC addresses and number of service instances that can be supported. Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) [RFC4664] provides a framework for extending Ethernet LAN services, using MPLS tunneling capabilities, through a routed MPLS backbone without running (M)STP across the backbone. As a result, VPLS has been deployed on a large scale in service provider networks. This draft discusses extensions to the VPLS PE model required to incorporate desirable PBB components while maintaining the Service Provider fit of the initial model. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-vpls-pe-model There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-vpls-pe-model-05 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-l2vpn-pbb-vpls-pe-model-05 Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From lizhenbin@huawei.com Thu Aug 30 01:29:18 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8CA621F867D for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:29:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.788 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.788 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_SUB_ENC_GB2312=1.345] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Irco1QItceb0 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:29:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED9EC21F867C for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:29:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AJE21217; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:29:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LHREML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 09:28:41 +0100 Received: from SZXEML412-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.91) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 09:29:14 +0100 Received: from SZXEML525-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.168]) by szxeml412-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.91]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:29:08 +0800 From: Lizhenbin To: Giles Heron , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: =?gb2312?B?tPC4tDogV0cgYWRvcHRpb24gY2FsbCBmb3IgVlBMUyBQRSBNb2RlbCBmb3Ig?= =?gb2312?Q?E-Tree_Support?= Thread-Topic: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support Thread-Index: AQHNgUkQ0LoM6rks502t1C/adI1z6pdyEDSA Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:29:07 +0000 Message-ID: <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D077992FD@szxeml525-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.76.75] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:29:18 -0000 U3VwcG9ydA0KDQoNCi0tLS0t08q8/tStvP4tLS0tLQ0Kt6K8/sjLOiBsMnZwbi1ib3VuY2VzQGll dGYub3JnIFttYWlsdG86bDJ2cG4tYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZ10gtPqx7SBHaWxlcyBIZXJvbg0K t6LLzcqxvOQ6IDIwMTLE6jjUwjI0yNUgMDowNA0KytW8/sjLOiBsMnZwbkBpZXRmLm9yZw0K1vfM 4jogV0cgYWRvcHRpb24gY2FsbCBmb3IgVlBMUyBQRSBNb2RlbCBmb3IgRS1UcmVlIFN1cHBvcnQN Cg0KVGhpcyBpcyBhIHJlcXVlc3QgdG8gZ2F1Z2UgY29uc2Vuc3VzIGFzIHRvIHdoZXRoZXI6DQoN Cmh0dHA6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0LWppYW5nLWwydnBuLXZwbHMtcGUtZXRy ZWUtMDYNCg0Kc2hvdWxkIGJlIGFjY2VwdGVkIGFzIGFuIEwyVlBOIFdHIGRyYWZ0Lg0KDQpXZSBk aXNjdXNzZWQgYWRvcHRpb24gb2YgdGhpcyBkcmFmdCBpbiBWYW5jb3V2ZXIsIGFuZCB0aGUgY29u c2Vuc3VzIG9mIHRoZSByb29tIHNlZW1lZCB0byBiZSB0byBhZG9wdCBpdCwgYnV0IG9mIGNvdXJz ZSB0aGUgbGlzdCBpcyB3aGVyZSB3ZSBtYWtlIGRlY2lzaW9ucyA6KQ0KDQpOb3RlIHRoYXQgd2Ug YWxzbyBkaXNjdXNzZWQgYWRvcHRpb24gb2YgdGhlIG90aGVyIFZQTFMgRS1UcmVlIGRyYWZ0cyBp biBWYW5jb3V2ZXIgYW5kIHRoZXJlIHdhcyB2ZXJ5IGxpdHRsZSBzdXBwb3J0LiAgICBJZiBtdWx0 aXBsZSBwZW9wbGUgZW1haWwgbWUgYXNraW5nIHRvIGFkb3B0IG9uZSBvciBvdGhlciBvZiB0aG9z ZSBkcmFmdHMgSSdsbCBwb2xsIHRoYXQgb25lIGFsc28uDQoNClBsZWFzZSByZXZpZXcgdGhlIGRy YWZ0IGFuZCByZXNwb25kIHRvIHRoZSBsaXN0IGJ5IFRodXJzZGF5IFNlcHRlbWJlciA2dGggd2l0 aCBjb21tZW50cyBhcyB0byBpdHMgc3VpdGFiaWxpdHkgZm9yIFdHIGFkb3B0aW9uLg0KDQpHaWxl cw0K From haoweiguo@huawei.com Thu Aug 30 01:57:01 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0261721F8567 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:57:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.788 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.788 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_SUB_ENC_GB2312=1.345] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4j4x8aYaefh3 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:57:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABE1921F8566 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:56:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AKE06433; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:56:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LHREML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 09:56:26 +0100 Received: from SZXEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.59) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 09:56:57 +0100 Received: from SZXEML511-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.129]) by szxeml404-hub.china.huawei.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:55:23 +0800 From: Haoweiguo To: Lizhenbin , Giles Heron , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: =?gb2312?B?tPC4tDogV0cgYWRvcHRpb24gY2FsbCBmb3IgVlBMUyBQRSBNb2RlbCBmb3Ig?= =?gb2312?Q?E-Tree_Support?= Thread-Topic: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support Thread-Index: AQHNgUkRowlL7sR6z0asFP3FQyh6P5dxilyAgACNXFQ= Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:55:22 +0000 Message-ID: References: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com>, <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D077992FD@szxeml525-mbx.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D077992FD@szxeml525-mbx.china.huawei.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.135.22.156] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:57:01 -0000 c3VwcG9ydA0KUmVnYXJkcw0KV2VpZ3VvDQoNCl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX18NCreivP7IyzogbDJ2cG4tYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZyBbbDJ2cG4tYm91bmNl c0BpZXRmLm9yZ10gtPqx7SBMaXpoZW5iaW4gW2xpemhlbmJpbkBodWF3ZWkuY29tXQ0Kt6LLzcqx vOQ6IDIwMTLE6jjUwjMwyNUgMTY6MjkNCrW9OiBHaWxlcyBIZXJvbjsgbDJ2cG5AaWV0Zi5vcmcN Ctb3zOI6ILTwuLQ6IFdHIGFkb3B0aW9uIGNhbGwgZm9yIFZQTFMgUEUgTW9kZWwgZm9yIEUtVHJl ZSBTdXBwb3J0DQoNClN1cHBvcnQNCg0KDQotLS0tLdPKvP7Urbz+LS0tLS0NCreivP7IyzogbDJ2 cG4tYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZyBbbWFpbHRvOmwydnBuLWJvdW5jZXNAaWV0Zi5vcmddILT6se0g R2lsZXMgSGVyb24NCreiy83KsbzkOiAyMDEyxOo41MIyNMjVIDA6MDQNCsrVvP7IyzogbDJ2cG5A aWV0Zi5vcmcNCtb3zOI6IFdHIGFkb3B0aW9uIGNhbGwgZm9yIFZQTFMgUEUgTW9kZWwgZm9yIEUt VHJlZSBTdXBwb3J0DQoNClRoaXMgaXMgYSByZXF1ZXN0IHRvIGdhdWdlIGNvbnNlbnN1cyBhcyB0 byB3aGV0aGVyOg0KDQpodHRwOi8vdG9vbHMuaWV0Zi5vcmcvaHRtbC9kcmFmdC1qaWFuZy1sMnZw bi12cGxzLXBlLWV0cmVlLTA2DQoNCnNob3VsZCBiZSBhY2NlcHRlZCBhcyBhbiBMMlZQTiBXRyBk cmFmdC4NCg0KV2UgZGlzY3Vzc2VkIGFkb3B0aW9uIG9mIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQgaW4gVmFuY291dmVy LCBhbmQgdGhlIGNvbnNlbnN1cyBvZiB0aGUgcm9vbSBzZWVtZWQgdG8gYmUgdG8gYWRvcHQgaXQs IGJ1dCBvZiBjb3Vyc2UgdGhlIGxpc3QgaXMgd2hlcmUgd2UgbWFrZSBkZWNpc2lvbnMgOikNCg0K Tm90ZSB0aGF0IHdlIGFsc28gZGlzY3Vzc2VkIGFkb3B0aW9uIG9mIHRoZSBvdGhlciBWUExTIEUt VHJlZSBkcmFmdHMgaW4gVmFuY291dmVyIGFuZCB0aGVyZSB3YXMgdmVyeSBsaXR0bGUgc3VwcG9y dC4gICAgSWYgbXVsdGlwbGUgcGVvcGxlIGVtYWlsIG1lIGFza2luZyB0byBhZG9wdCBvbmUgb3Ig b3RoZXIgb2YgdGhvc2UgZHJhZnRzIEknbGwgcG9sbCB0aGF0IG9uZSBhbHNvLg0KDQpQbGVhc2Ug cmV2aWV3IHRoZSBkcmFmdCBhbmQgcmVzcG9uZCB0byB0aGUgbGlzdCBieSBUaHVyc2RheSBTZXB0 ZW1iZXIgNnRoIHdpdGggY29tbWVudHMgYXMgdG8gaXRzIHN1aXRhYmlsaXR5IGZvciBXRyBhZG9w dGlvbi4NCg0KR2lsZXM= From xuxiaohu@huawei.com Thu Aug 30 03:04:18 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 300F521F8555 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 03:04:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.824 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.824 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.964, BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_SUB_ENC_GB2312=1.345] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WMOF3IoBHTpN for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 03:04:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE89721F854F for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 03:04:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AJE30660; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 10:04:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LHREML402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:03:35 +0100 Received: from SZXEML407-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.94) by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:04:05 +0100 Received: from SZXEML525-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.168]) by szxeml407-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.94]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:03:56 +0800 From: Xuxiaohu To: Lizhenbin , Giles Heron , "l2vpn@ietf.org" Subject: =?gb2312?B?tPC4tDogV0cgYWRvcHRpb24gY2FsbCBmb3IgVlBMUyBQRSBNb2RlbCBmb3Ig?= =?gb2312?Q?E-Tree_Support?= Thread-Topic: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support Thread-Index: AQHNgUkNGwZN9W/zQkmcLxtksXP515dxilyAgACggkA= Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 10:03:55 +0000 Message-ID: <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE075553C7@szxeml525-mbx.china.huawei.com> References: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com> <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D077992FD@szxeml525-mbx.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D077992FD@szxeml525-mbx.china.huawei.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.99.24] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 10:04:18 -0000 KzENCg0KPiAtLS0tLdPKvP7Urbz+LS0tLS0NCj4gt6K8/sjLOiBsMnZwbi1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYu b3JnIFttYWlsdG86bDJ2cG4tYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZ10gtPqx7Q0KPiBMaXpoZW5iaW4NCj4g t6LLzcqxvOQ6IDIwMTLE6jjUwjMwyNUgMTY6MjkNCj4gytW8/sjLOiBHaWxlcyBIZXJvbjsgbDJ2 cG5AaWV0Zi5vcmcNCj4g1vfM4jogtPC4tDogV0cgYWRvcHRpb24gY2FsbCBmb3IgVlBMUyBQRSBN b2RlbCBmb3IgRS1UcmVlIFN1cHBvcnQNCj4gDQo+IFN1cHBvcnQNCj4gDQo+IA0KPiAtLS0tLdPK vP7Urbz+LS0tLS0NCj4gt6K8/sjLOiBsMnZwbi1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYub3JnIFttYWlsdG86bDJ2 cG4tYm91bmNlc0BpZXRmLm9yZ10gtPqx7SBHaWxlcw0KPiBIZXJvbg0KPiC3osvNyrG85DogMjAx MsTqONTCMjTI1SAwOjA0DQo+IMrVvP7IyzogbDJ2cG5AaWV0Zi5vcmcNCj4g1vfM4jogV0cgYWRv cHRpb24gY2FsbCBmb3IgVlBMUyBQRSBNb2RlbCBmb3IgRS1UcmVlIFN1cHBvcnQNCj4gDQo+IFRo aXMgaXMgYSByZXF1ZXN0IHRvIGdhdWdlIGNvbnNlbnN1cyBhcyB0byB3aGV0aGVyOg0KPiANCj4g aHR0cDovL3Rvb2xzLmlldGYub3JnL2h0bWwvZHJhZnQtamlhbmctbDJ2cG4tdnBscy1wZS1ldHJl ZS0wNg0KPiANCj4gc2hvdWxkIGJlIGFjY2VwdGVkIGFzIGFuIEwyVlBOIFdHIGRyYWZ0Lg0KPiAN Cj4gV2UgZGlzY3Vzc2VkIGFkb3B0aW9uIG9mIHRoaXMgZHJhZnQgaW4gVmFuY291dmVyLCBhbmQg dGhlIGNvbnNlbnN1cyBvZiB0aGUNCj4gcm9vbSBzZWVtZWQgdG8gYmUgdG8gYWRvcHQgaXQsIGJ1 dCBvZiBjb3Vyc2UgdGhlIGxpc3QgaXMgd2hlcmUgd2UgbWFrZQ0KPiBkZWNpc2lvbnMgOikNCj4g DQo+IE5vdGUgdGhhdCB3ZSBhbHNvIGRpc2N1c3NlZCBhZG9wdGlvbiBvZiB0aGUgb3RoZXIgVlBM UyBFLVRyZWUgZHJhZnRzIGluDQo+IFZhbmNvdXZlciBhbmQgdGhlcmUgd2FzIHZlcnkgbGl0dGxl IHN1cHBvcnQuICAgIElmIG11bHRpcGxlIHBlb3BsZSBlbWFpbCBtZQ0KPiBhc2tpbmcgdG8gYWRv cHQgb25lIG9yIG90aGVyIG9mIHRob3NlIGRyYWZ0cyBJJ2xsIHBvbGwgdGhhdCBvbmUgYWxzby4N Cj4gDQo+IFBsZWFzZSByZXZpZXcgdGhlIGRyYWZ0IGFuZCByZXNwb25kIHRvIHRoZSBsaXN0IGJ5 IFRodXJzZGF5IFNlcHRlbWJlciA2dGggd2l0aA0KPiBjb21tZW50cyBhcyB0byBpdHMgc3VpdGFi aWxpdHkgZm9yIFdHIGFkb3B0aW9uLg0KPiANCj4gR2lsZXMNCg== From adrian@olddog.co.uk Thu Aug 30 03:40:54 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C682121F8610 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 03:40:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.536 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.536 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.063, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ve-SrYgFCKec for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 03:40:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (asmtp2.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.249]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E96A021F8466 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 03:40:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q7UAeoNJ003555; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:40:50 +0100 Received: from 950129200 (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q7UAenUh003525 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:40:50 +0100 From: "Adrian Farrel" To: "'Giles Heron'" , References: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com> Subject: RE: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:40:49 +0100 Message-ID: <209301cd869b$ec744c70$c55ce550$@olddog.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQMt33tErrHPnZju5YJTu3npZlcxsJSxdjkQ Content-Language: en-gb X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 10:40:54 -0000 Speaking entirely as an individual, I am not overjoyed by the license terms promised in the disclosure at http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1756/ I don't think this predicates against adopting this document into the WG, but it would be good if we can think about the IPR and consider whether the WG solution can avoid the IPR claim and so avoid the license that has been threatened. In contrast, the disclosure at http://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1708/ contains license terms seem acceptable to me. Cheers, Adrian > -----Original Message----- > From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Giles Heron > Sent: 23 August 2012 17:04 > To: l2vpn@ietf.org > Subject: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support > > This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-06 > > should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. > > We discussed adoption of this draft in Vancouver, and the consensus of the room > seemed to be to adopt it, but of course the list is where we make decisions :) > > Note that we also discussed adoption of the other VPLS E-Tree drafts in > Vancouver and there was very little support. If multiple people email me asking > to adopt one or other of those drafts I'll poll that one also. > > Please review the draft and respond to the list by Thursday September 6th with > comments as to its suitability for WG adoption. > > Giles= From yuqun.cao@gmail.com Thu Aug 30 04:20:48 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B49B521F8615 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:20:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I8c-an2LDBRn for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:20:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F351721F8607 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:20:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pbbrr4 with SMTP id rr4so2865926pbb.31 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:20:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index :content-language; bh=uRJ39GcRMmkRNYKKzBQX/er/bHxcojOR97Jf5Q0Xgj0=; b=Shvmipp1S/PZ5rbk0xHDdRwxc5N2kSYMNCEe+OZr4qp5OF0kydsszy6qAwxZzWwi8K MWGc1I87CaeKnD4SeW9kile+wyzff5RaYwfAxshRMDMXaY2UfdtnFKwxzUBkPGgJZd6r X7rvmaiydJbkymT42qJHQmX3avdiwJWcjkTJs56p/gkH99lAnHyME+IxkXwbgtwdLsLk 4RUGr2Rn26s+MyHS9w39hRwpGQ4jwYl7DKLY4MZk67jGsopQX4UJRqSeHQU/+SGc4OsG +TBOnf8Iu7OWZuWlGKS4DOiP9ssg/bFMvhKDMOSdihcPnDra57bX9pHLsWrzDGY9X74h NPNQ== Received: by 10.68.132.3 with SMTP id oq3mr11452118pbb.58.1346325647538; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:20:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Server ([112.111.63.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hc10sm1418817pbc.21.2012.08.30.04.20.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:20:45 -0700 (PDT) From: "Sam Cao" To: References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: L2vpn Digest, Vol 99, Issue 8 Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 19:27:46 +0800 Message-ID: <000f01cd86a2$7e65b0f0$7b3112d0$@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQIPYqQrz7Kn1pX8xNIeouQbO8T4Xpbuf0dw Content-Language: zh-cn X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:20:48 -0000 Support. Also ask for WG adoption for draft-ram-l2vpn-etree-multiple-pw-01. Thanks, Sam -----Original Message----- From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of l2vpn-request@ietf.org Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 3:00 AM To: l2vpn@ietf.org Subject: L2vpn Digest, Vol 99, Issue 8 If you have received this digest without all the individual message attachments you will need to update your digest options in your list subscription. To do so, go to https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn Click the 'Unsubscribe or edit options' button, log in, and set "Get MIME or Plain Text Digests?" to MIME. You can set this option globally for all the list digests you receive at this point. Send L2vpn mailing list submissions to l2vpn@ietf.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to l2vpn-request@ietf.org You can reach the person managing the list at l2vpn-owner@ietf.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of L2vpn digest..." Today's Topics: 1. RE: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support (Raymond Key) 2. Re: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support (Andrew G. Malis) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:10:00 +1030 From: Raymond Key To: , Subject: RE: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Support > From: giles.heron@gmail.com > Subject: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support > Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:03:44 +0100 > To: l2vpn@ietf.org > > This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-06 > > should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. > > We discussed adoption of this draft in Vancouver, and the consensus of > the room seemed to be to adopt it, but of course the list is where we > make decisions :) > > Note that we also discussed adoption of the other VPLS E-Tree drafts in Vancouver and there was very little support. If multiple people email me asking to adopt one or other of those drafts I'll poll that one also. > > Please review the draft and respond to the list by Thursday September 6th with comments as to its suitability for WG adoption. > > Giles -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 12:17:31 +0300 From: "Andrew G. Malis" To: Giles Heron Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org Subject: Re: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Support. Cheers, Andy On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Giles Heron wrote: > This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-06 > > should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. > > We discussed adoption of this draft in Vancouver, and the consensus of > the room seemed to be to adopt it, but of course the list is where we > make decisions :) > > Note that we also discussed adoption of the other VPLS E-Tree drafts in Vancouver and there was very little support. If multiple people email me asking to adopt one or other of those drafts I'll poll that one also. > > Please review the draft and respond to the list by Thursday September 6th with comments as to its suitability for WG adoption. > > Giles ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ L2vpn mailing list L2vpn@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn End of L2vpn Digest, Vol 99, Issue 8 ************************************