From michawe@ifi.uio.no Sun Apr 17 11:48:40 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ledbat@ietfc.amsl.com Delivered-To: ledbat@ietfc.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 315D8E06EC for ; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 11:48:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -104.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jqhaYP2Leqdy for ; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 11:48:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-out1.uio.no (mail-out1.uio.no [IPv6:2001:700:100:10::57]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 866AEE0689 for ; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 11:48:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-mx1.uio.no ([129.240.10.29]) by mail-out1.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.75) (envelope-from ) id 1QBX1S-0003G8-4H for ledbat@ietf.org; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 20:48:38 +0200 Received: from cm-84.208.175.27.getinternet.no ([84.208.175.27] helo=[192.168.0.199]) by mail-mx1.uio.no with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) user michawe (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QBX1M-0004wa-Hh for ledbat@ietf.org; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 20:48:33 +0200 Message-Id: From: Michael Welzl To: ledbat@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 20:48:11 +0200 References: <20110417184731.8FC7CE06A0@ietfc.amsl.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-UiO-Ratelimit-Test: rcpts/h 1 msgs/h 1 sum rcpts/h 1 sum msgs/h 1 total rcpts 8619 max rcpts/h 36 ratelimit 0 X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.0, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5, uiobl=NO, uiouri=NO) X-UiO-Scanned: E3ED3FEAFD4F614DBC7B017AF15AC863E6BF5695 X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 84.208.175.27 spam_score: -49 maxlevel 80 minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 1 total 979 max/h 18 blacklist 0 greylist 0 ratelimit 0 Subject: [ledbat] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ledbat-survey-06 X-BeenThere: ledbat@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list of the LEDBAT WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 18:48:40 -0000 Hi, We have submitted this update to address the comments from IETF Last Call. Cheers, Michael Begin forwarded message: > From: IETF I-D Submission Tool > Date: April 17, 2011 8:47:31 PM GMT+02:00 > To: michawe@ifi.uio.no > Cc: david.ros@telecom-bretagne.eu > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ledbat-survey-06 > > > A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-ledbat-survey-06.txt has been > successfully submitted by Michael Welzl and posted to the IETF > repository. > > Filename: draft-ietf-ledbat-survey > Revision: 06 > Title: A Survey of Lower-than-Best-Effort Transport Protocols > Creation_date: 2011-04-17 > WG ID: ledbat > Number_of_pages: 19 > > Abstract: > This document provides a survey of transport protocols which are > designed to have a smaller bandwidth and/or delay impact on standard > TCP than standard TCP itself when they share a bottleneck with it. > Such protocols could be used for delay-insensitive "background" > traffic, as they provide what is sometimes called a "less than" (or > "lower than") best-effort service. > > > > The IETF Secretariat. > > From michawe@ifi.uio.no Sun Apr 24 09:25:51 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ledbat@ietfc.amsl.com Delivered-To: ledbat@ietfc.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE74DE068A for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 09:25:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -100.02 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.02 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NPLJUqc0IMKU for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 09:25:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-out1.uio.no (mail-out1.uio.no [IPv6:2001:700:100:10::57]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEA7EE062B for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 09:25:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-mx1.uio.no ([129.240.10.29]) by mail-out1.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.75) (envelope-from ) id 1QE285-0005JL-Gx for ledbat@ietf.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 18:25:49 +0200 Received: from [194.48.133.8] (helo=[192.168.1.3]) by mail-mx1.uio.no with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) user michawe (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QE284-0007Br-69 for ledbat@ietf.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2011 18:25:49 +0200 Message-Id: From: Michael Welzl To: ledbat@ietf.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 18:25:46 +0200 References: <20110417184731.8FC7CE06A0@ietfc.amsl.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-UiO-Ratelimit-Test: rcpts/h 4 msgs/h 4 sum rcpts/h 4 sum msgs/h 4 total rcpts 8696 max rcpts/h 36 ratelimit 0 X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.0, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5, uiobl=NO, uiouri=NO) X-UiO-Scanned: D4F25CC7266B4B3C6529F8AAF49D0F4C363CDBC4 X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 194.48.133.8 spam_score: -49 maxlevel 80 minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 4 total 190 max/h 9 blacklist 0 greylist 0 ratelimit 0 Subject: Re: [ledbat] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ledbat-survey-06 X-BeenThere: ledbat@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Mailing list of the LEDBAT WG List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 16:25:51 -0000 Hi, We have just submitted another update, version 7: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ledbat-survey-07 to fix a broken sentence at the end of the Introduction that Wes spotted. I removed this sentence and the one preceding it, they were left in by mistake as I made my previous update. Cheers, Michael On Apr 17, 2011, at 8:48 PM, Michael Welzl wrote: > Hi, > > We have submitted this update to address the comments from IETF Last > Call. > > Cheers, > Michael > > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: IETF I-D Submission Tool >> Date: April 17, 2011 8:47:31 PM GMT+02:00 >> To: michawe@ifi.uio.no >> Cc: david.ros@telecom-bretagne.eu >> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ledbat-survey-06 >> >> >> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-ledbat-survey-06.txt has been >> successfully submitted by Michael Welzl and posted to the IETF >> repository. >> >> Filename: draft-ietf-ledbat-survey >> Revision: 06 >> Title: A Survey of Lower-than-Best-Effort Transport Protocols >> Creation_date: 2011-04-17 >> WG ID: ledbat >> Number_of_pages: 19 >> >> Abstract: >> This document provides a survey of transport protocols which are >> designed to have a smaller bandwidth and/or delay impact on standard >> TCP than standard TCP itself when they share a bottleneck with it. >> Such protocols could be used for delay-insensitive "background" >> traffic, as they provide what is sometimes called a "less than" (or >> "lower than") best-effort service. >> >> >> >> The IETF Secretariat. >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > ledbat mailing list > ledbat@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ledbat