Subject: RE: [lemonade] CATENATE and drafts

From: [email-masked]
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 21:39:58 -0500

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Mark Crispin [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 3:47 PM
...
> I believe that, for the most part, Lemonade has punted on 
> this issue on 
> the grounds that it is not directly germaine to Lemonade's chartered 
> tasks.  The task which needed to be solved was 
> "forward-without-download".

Implementers are then left to deal with it. Constrained clients wishing to support forward without download will be put in a difficult situation. They will have to cobble something together that will certainly not be ideal, or they can choose not to support drafts. 

> not purpose to get Lemonade to take on additional problems.  
> Lemonade's 
> charter is already quite full!

Is the burden technical workload or the pain of consensus?

Mike

_______________________________________________
lemonade mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lemonade