From wwwrun@rfc-editor.org Tue Feb 1 07:11:07 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lemonade@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: lemonade@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08ADA3A6C09 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 07:11:07 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.299 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.301, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rxtJdX9NiVuT for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 07:11:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:1112:1::2f]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 732A83A6C05 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 07:11:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 95D1CE0739; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 07:14:20 -0800 (PST) To: Alexey.Melnikov@isode.com, chris.newman@sun.com, alexey.melnikov@isode.com, stpeter@stpeter.im, gparsons@nortel.com, eburger@standardstrack.com From: RFC Errata System Message-Id: <20110201151420.95D1CE0739@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 07:14:20 -0800 (PST) Cc: lemonade@ietf.org, evnikita2@gmail.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [lemonade] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5092 (2699) X-BeenThere: lemonade@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Enhancements to Internet email to support diverse service enivronments List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:11:07 -0000 The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5092, "IMAP URL Scheme". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5092&eid=2699 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Mykyta Yevstifeyev Section: 13.2 Original Text ------------- [URI-REG] Hansen, T., Hardie, T., and L. Masinter, "Guidelines and Registration Procedures for New URI Schemes", BCP 115, RFC 4395, February 2006. Corrected Text -------------- [URI-REG] Hansen, T., Hardie, T., and L. Masinter, "Guidelines and Registration Procedures for New URI Schemes", BCP 35, RFC 4395, February 2006. Notes ----- RFC 4395 is not BCP 115, but BCP 35. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5092 (draft-ietf-lemonade-rfc2192bis-09) -------------------------------------- Title : IMAP URL Scheme Publication Date : November 2007 Author(s) : A. Melnikov, Ed., C. Newman Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Enhancements to Internet email to support diverse service environments Area : Applications Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com Tue Feb 1 13:46:24 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lemonade@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: lemonade@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 587573A6ABE for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:46:24 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.864 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.864 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.113, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oi1S7jiD1fFa for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:46:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D7433A6856 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:46:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by iwc10 with SMTP id 10so432850iwc.31 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 13:49:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=d/WM8/g/oBekmBqD6AFmSl4o3aPar7nrLorh/Ml08FA=; b=DIGG3H8PaxUJxOTXUYfdXIjqW5Z39843tsNeyWqd3Qlj1OmTmqJR47ymtZSlxWuSi1 btif7QBMCp5tALntGreDyQjK19LfTeawuGkRPFgizbaVr2hxvSQCjA00f8LAumAlOl+t HLNC3PE3lfgAn7h09QjTUuKVARvKqKviBCFcw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=htzu3F5q7dHllYsEJ5DeJtm6l4qBWT0U/YzirhAdnONMPCF6483PvyYH6164iImYR6 xuP6UeSPkbRNeJuKXzdjPQ9OwUl4TVkGiBQNAi0n2uCQk+rqcV3kg/c32+Bto9rMKQwa tmpo9Ne7+etrS7KiiVt6YGEOQCqXBmQ8NNPrU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.167.9 with SMTP id q9mr9991674icy.266.1296596981154; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 13:49:41 -0800 (PST) Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com Received: by 10.42.228.74 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:49:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20110201151420.95D1CE0739@rfc-editor.org> References: <20110201151420.95D1CE0739@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 16:49:41 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: MZDOZkxic6g75ON0Chqw2qqtORs Message-ID: From: Barry Leiba To: RFC Errata System Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: evnikita2@gmail.com, gparsons@nortel.com, lemonade@ietf.org, Alexey.Melnikov@isode.com, chris.newman@sun.com Subject: Re: [lemonade] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5092 (2699) X-BeenThere: lemonade@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Enhancements to Internet email to support diverse service enivronments List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 21:46:24 -0000 [Top posting.] This erratum doesn't matter; there was an error when RFC 4395 was published, incorrectly making it a new BCP, BCP 115, rather than correctly having it replace BCP 35. That was corrected in January 2009, by making both BCPs point to RFC 4395, officially retiring BCP 115 (so it's not updated later), and entering an erratum against RFC 4395: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3D4395 Anyone looking for either BCP number will find RFC 4395. I suggest closing this erratum as "rejected", but "verified" or "held for document update" work too. >>shrug<< Barry On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:14 AM, RFC Errata System wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5092, > "IMAP URL Scheme". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3D5092&eid=3D2699 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Mykyta Yevstifeyev > > Section: 13.2 > > Original Text > ------------- > [URI-REG] =A0 =A0Hansen, T., Hardie, T., and L. Masinter, "Guidelines and > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Registration Procedures for New URI Schemes", BCP= 115, > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 RFC 4395, February 2006. > > > Corrected Text > -------------- > [URI-REG] =A0 =A0Hansen, T., Hardie, T., and L. Masinter, "Guidelines and > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Registration Procedures for New URI Schemes", BCP= 35, > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 RFC 4395, February 2006. > > > Notes > ----- > RFC 4395 is not BCP 115, but BCP 35. From evnikita2@gmail.com Tue Feb 1 21:59:59 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lemonade@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: lemonade@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 072113A6CAC for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 21:59:59 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.241 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.241 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.603, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qv0DRhomvR27 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 21:59:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A3783A6B60 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 21:59:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by fxm9 with SMTP id 9so8329168fxm.31 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 22:03:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=IqfHOPfiMe04yF/yUscblBHdiVvZGRwtpclSYqLKYSU=; b=akepAJRLM4dLZSqSXIJ6i2bKuorXA4OjhJOHXaKf/JqSRhiftfWnCJnHpNV7zu6OTu Mps/qewMOToYngn2eTJKOhj4xkj/1l/3IZzQN7gsppgendcXUwmyYPxEbr5FTNgpoKaT UqUkifphj+BsX2NOS04h8mj0o4p1J3Km9uv1M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type; b=phZGwOGdQF/557+vhUzR0r1NwW7/6VaOUQ0bKwv+sXVK76bzkkymvKswcMxNsMU6cG P2YKVJv8g23YVHHGkf9Eo8qEvMYHemX0tcsymZ9nj+0m3KflczviMfGA8YWopBlNcA+K aRUoa4STG825+wm0eaIFg3RMEB2ja5X3lzme4= Received: by 10.223.89.139 with SMTP id e11mr392438fam.69.1296626595708; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 22:03:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([195.191.104.134]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e17sm8175469fak.10.2011.02.01.22.03.12 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 01 Feb 2011 22:03:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D48F3B8.4010305@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 08:03:36 +0200 From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ru; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Barry Leiba References: <20110201151420.95D1CE0739@rfc-editor.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090104020409000700010304" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 09:29:25 -0800 Cc: gparsons@nortel.com, lemonade@ietf.org, Alexey.Melnikov@isode.com, chris.newman@sun.com, RFC Errata System Subject: Re: [lemonade] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5092 (2699) X-BeenThere: lemonade@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: Enhancements to Internet email to support diverse service enivronments List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 05:59:59 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090104020409000700010304 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 01.02.2011 23:49, Barry Leiba wrote: > [Top posting.] > > This erratum doesn't matter; there was an error when RFC 4395 was > published, incorrectly making it a new BCP, BCP 115, rather than > correctly having it replace BCP 35. That was corrected in January > 2009, by making both BCPs point to RFC 4395, officially retiring BCP > 115 (so it's not updated later), and entering an erratum against RFC > 4395: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4395 There is a *verified* errata to RFC 4395 changing its BCP number to 35. Therefore I think it is appropriate here. > Anyone looking for either BCP number will find RFC 4395. BCP 35 will be more formally correct - see above. > I suggest closing this erratum as "rejected", but "verified" or "held > for document update" work too.>>shrug<< I do not object the state 'held for document update'. Mykyta Yevstifeyev > Barry > > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:14 AM, RFC Errata System > wrote: >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5092, >> "IMAP URL Scheme". >> >> -------------------------------------- >> You may review the report below and at: >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5092&eid=2699 >> >> -------------------------------------- >> Type: Editorial >> Reported by: Mykyta Yevstifeyev >> >> Section: 13.2 >> >> Original Text >> ------------- >> [URI-REG] Hansen, T., Hardie, T., and L. Masinter, "Guidelines and >> Registration Procedures for New URI Schemes", BCP 115, >> RFC 4395, February 2006. >> >> >> Corrected Text >> -------------- >> [URI-REG] Hansen, T., Hardie, T., and L. Masinter, "Guidelines and >> Registration Procedures for New URI Schemes", BCP 35, >> RFC 4395, February 2006. >> >> >> Notes >> ----- >> RFC 4395 is not BCP 115, but BCP 35. --------------090104020409000700010304 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 01.02.2011 23:49, Barry Leiba wrote: 
[Top posting.]

This erratum doesn't matter; there was an error when RFC 4395 was
published, incorrectly making it a new BCP, BCP 115, rather than
correctly having it replace BCP 35.  That was corrected in January
2009, by making both BCPs point to RFC 4395, officially retiring BCP
115 (so it's not updated later), and entering an erratum against RFC
4395: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4395
There is a verified errata to RFC 4395 changing its BCP number to 35.  Therefore I think it is appropriate here.
Anyone looking for either BCP number will find RFC 4395.
BCP 35 will be more formally correct - see above.
I suggest closing this erratum as "rejected", but "verified" or "held
for document update" work too.  >>shrug<<
I do not object the state 'held for document update'.

Mykyta Yevstifeyev
Barry

On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:14 AM, RFC Errata System
<rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5092,
"IMAP URL Scheme".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5092&eid=2699

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>

Section: 13.2

Original Text
-------------
[URI-REG]    Hansen, T., Hardie, T., and L. Masinter, "Guidelines and
            Registration Procedures for New URI Schemes", BCP 115,
            RFC 4395, February 2006.


Corrected Text
--------------
[URI-REG]    Hansen, T., Hardie, T., and L. Masinter, "Guidelines and
            Registration Procedures for New URI Schemes", BCP 35,
            RFC 4395, February 2006.


Notes
-----
RFC 4395 is not BCP 115, but BCP 35.


    

    

  


--------------090104020409000700010304--