From nobody Wed May 13 12:26:47 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C091B30E8 for ; Wed, 13 May 2015 12:26:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4Sej_-KtXhPJ for ; Wed, 13 May 2015 12:26:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BCE21B30E3 for ; Wed, 13 May 2015 12:26:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=990; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1431545205; x=1432754805; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=UwWtz3+RWT6QXz0LQNtIhlKV6PgutLDU9IdFK95+Lag=; b=kzJPIZtePnv2q7LjKZkaoU6WlL12uLlDmpvTCIhE2bE+T/da0uJ68NaM 6NHAj/wUZt0Agn4dXVdUu8y/muo+in6Fi+fm+eRrGQvpxxWKHUC+ESEEP ifAf1Q+FKoH+c7IZxbNrDol2wmDzFAwlOmx2xCP250DZWiNmU9txqoC5w w=; X-Files: signature.asc : 203 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AOBQD4pFNV/4QNJK1cgw+BOIMYwQmKC0wBAQEBAQGBC4QnI2gBSgI0JwQhiB6nD49XkkYBAQEBAQUBAQEBAQEcky4vgRYFklaCCoE/hyeBJYNjkW4jYYMWgjSBAQEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,422,1427760000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="419538562" Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 May 2015 19:26:42 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com [173.36.12.80]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t4DJQggf015146 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 13 May 2015 19:26:42 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.248]) by xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com ([173.36.12.80]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 13 May 2015 14:26:42 -0500 From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" To: "lime@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: LIME Applicability informational document Thread-Index: AQHQjbK9eOi7n+7iuE29lBlU97bizw== Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 19:26:42 +0000 Message-ID: <3663AD45-7EAE-4000-AD84-D91BFD917D85@cisco.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.150.53.232] Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_BDF70A38-AFF2-4092-A648-88E220F36049"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: [Lime] LIME Applicability informational document X-BeenThere: lime@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Layer Independent OAM Management in Multi-Layer Environment \(LIME\) discussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 19:26:46 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_BDF70A38-AFF2-4092-A648-88E220F36049 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Hi, LIME, We are looking for volunteers to help drive the LIME Applicability = informational document. This is a charter item, which was discussed in = Dallas. If you would be willing and available to help shape this document, = please reach out to Ron and myself. Thanks, =E2=80=94 Carlos. --Apple-Mail=_BDF70A38-AFF2-4092-A648-88E220F36049 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iEYEARECAAYFAlVTpXoACgkQtfDPGTp3USwAJQCgumCp0OfobEU+Ee61XssgJs0H MMUAoMohbWWCSpJXkVx0awmTD/S8EFwr =1+/q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_BDF70A38-AFF2-4092-A648-88E220F36049-- From nobody Sat May 23 14:19:30 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 992C71A87D4 for ; Sat, 23 May 2015 14:19:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CTc5WIWNp7nk for ; Sat, 23 May 2015 14:19:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asmtp5.iomartmail.com (asmtp5.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F2AA1A87CE for ; Sat, 23 May 2015 14:19:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asmtp5.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp5.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t4NLJJQ9020826; Sat, 23 May 2015 22:19:19 +0100 Received: from 950129200 (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp5.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t4NLJEF8020795 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 23 May 2015 22:19:14 +0100 From: "Adrian Farrel" To: "'Yuji Tochio'" References: <20150427073131.7037.78860.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <553DE7EE.3010402@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <553DE7EE.3010402@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 22:19:13 +0100 Message-ID: <005f01d0959e$1ee06c20$5ca14460$@olddog.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0060_01D095A6.81DA9500" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQHHI18OjtIcwWcKVAxTO5vX8J+pDALzBsp6nYVccyA= Content-Language: en-gb X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1576-8.0.0.1202-21566.002 X-TM-AS-Result: No--29.890-10.0-31-10 X-imss-scan-details: No--29.890-10.0-31-10 X-TMASE-MatchedRID: +XkuFvcrUd1bJCKOm3VRCaj5v7I4/SgYN1NeJEsbqQ4e6GUWWVEuDQI5 OtZF5Lu6bVYo1Z2dZpuVUcz8XpiS9Od2PjzGmg/oZ5yuplze9ptvj1hstVq77a20zRaVPJQPwpd Z5MbdDwgORv2+mkhkfFz+axQLnAVBg2eA1cMADHwFt5BIjeJMn9JexDI72Zjs/KZy/UDToe8YBd Z8Omt2ldRsGhxK+o13GFMYlDUzwr0QC81tuAfPvif6nnnZywjVFnrzJSdcWB+Qm6BojE/Wzy5Sh DQVR9yT4WB3USFbPt9CvapcIkxJX2Rt0giz+0LSM/dZg2GSzOVqucXYaAgF/eeYyr94GMT3RWAs m8cJ+0EGJTyb+XENS7xygpRxo469dnrMZEmwlHSNC3ENm/V8D0tU4/pKr/obDsbtrO33TVeLFgn z+hpr+XW0oJLOugKBj1RGQOB2Vvn9GaYSzB/sh6Jd7mc2dRi3oEozraubH2nx6gF+AN4QjuBe5Q RmIfivPwbcb/CNUOlwvDydhBUuyCAXLFyLhL5W5GdZsk1yqBeP7GAQSe5/nfbBROhn2OIGPC7j/ mzpDFqfL6D8TtOZrGuj3ZVU+M9wlIvcAfYJnEoVvvd4qkb1+1Q+CF9xoc5LnE2RogVHfH2sEFKe f8ZUxqf50/sZyNUdupDIC9422Dq2raKhDLB9XeeU0qFv58B+aOLTgTM6Njg8NwUqJRyhvvTrMLJ 5+bJIFIXwv4qc0ZOlhD9Iy+IVwyIEB/X0tggGlThwL2cA6F1R18QpzXStTjhEMZsHJG9bERIFEm VIRRZTovWuZWqWkd/wYmMFcJSI3keXXBe59XmbKItl61J/yZUdXE/WGn0FfeZdJ1XsorjAiGa2I 4v7lyAHAopEd76v23NSczq5kDbfHZ4ZRcs4KvNz4UDpaRP+7XqofGjljlC8qGw5cH0HhQ== Archived-At: Cc: lime@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lime] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis-03.txt X-BeenThere: lime@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk List-Id: "Layer Independent OAM Management in Multi-Layer Environment \(LIME\) discussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 21:19:27 -0000 This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0060_01D095A6.81DA9500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Yuji, Thanks for keeping this up-to-date. Would it be possible to re-post it as draft-txh-lime-gap-analysis so that the document shows up as a LIME document? Cheers, Adrian From: Lime [mailto:lime-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Yuji Tochio Sent: 27 April 2015 08:41 To: lime@ietf.org Subject: [Lime] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis-03.txt Hi all, FYI: It is just to update some references (published year) and add [draft-lam-lime-summary-l0-l2] for section 3.8. Regards, Yuji -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: New Version Notification for draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis-03.txt Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 00:31:31 -0700 From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: Liang Xia (Frank) , Liang Xia , Yuji Tochio , Huub van Helvoort , Huub van Helvoort , Yuji Tochio A new version of I-D, draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis-03.txt has been successfully submitted by Yuji Tochio and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis Revision: 03 Title: Gap Analysis for Layer and Technology Independent OAM Management in the Multi-Layer Environment Document date: 2015-04-27 Group: Individual Submission Pages: 12 URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis-03.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis/ Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis-03 Diff: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis-03 Abstract: This draft analyses the existing management plane OAM related works in different SDOs, against the key objectives of Layer Independent OAM Management (LIME), to find the gap between them. The results can be used as the guidance for further work. This gap analysis is not targeted at L0-L2 transport OAM in ITU-T, either technology specific or generic across those technologies. Rather, it is intended to leverage knowledge from that domain for the benefit of developing generic layer independent OAM management for L3-L7 (and L2.5 MPLS OAM). Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. The IETF Secretariat ------=_NextPart_000_0060_01D095A6.81DA9500 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Yuji,

 

Thanks for keeping this = up-to-date.

Would it be possible to re-post it as = draft-txh-lime-gap-analysis so that the document shows up as a LIME = document?

 

Cheers,

Adrian

 

From: Lime [mailto:lime-bounces@ietf.org] On = Behalf Of Yuji Tochio
Sent: 27 April 2015 = 08:41
To: lime@ietf.org
Subject: [Lime] Fwd: New = Version Notification for = draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis-03.txt

 

Hi = all,

FYI:
It is just to update some references (published = year) and add [draft-lam-lime-summary-l0-l2] for section = 3.8.

Regards, Yuji



-------- Forwarded Message -------- =

Subject: =

New Version Notification for = draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis-03.txt

Date:

Mon, 27 Apr 2015 = 00:31:31 -0700

From: =

internet-drafts@ietf.org

To:

Liang Xia (Frank) = <frank.xialiang@huawei.com&g= t;, Liang Xia <frank.xialiang@huawei.com&g= t;, Yuji Tochio <tochio@jp.fujitsu.com>, = Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com>, = Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com>, = Yuji Tochio <tochio@jp.fujitsu.com>

 

A new version =
of I-D, =
draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis-03.txt
has been =
successfully submitted by Yuji Tochio and posted to =
the
IETF =
repository.
 
Name:        =
; =
draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis
Revision:<=
span style=3D'mso-tab-count:1'>     =
03
Title:        =
Gap Analysis for Layer and Technology Independent OAM Management =
in the Multi-Layer Environment
Document date: =
2015-04-27
Group:        =
Individual Submission
Pages:        =
12
URL:       &nbs=
p;    http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-txh-opsawg-lime-g=
ap-analysis-03.txt
Status:       &nbs=
p; https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis/=

Htmlized:       =
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis-03
Diff:       &nbs=
p;   http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-ana=
lysis-03
 
Abstract:
   =
This draft analyses the existing management plane OAM related =
works
   =
in different SDOs, against the key objectives of Layer =
Independent
   OAM Management (LIME), to =
find the gap between them.  =
The results can
   be used as the guidance =
for further work.  This gap =
analysis is not
   targeted at L0-L2 =
transport OAM in ITU-T, either technology =
specific
   or generic across those =
technologies.  Rather, it =
is intended to
   leverage knowledge from =
that domain for the benefit of developing
   generic layer independent =
OAM management for L3-L7 (and L2.5 MPLS
   =
OAM).
 
       &nbs=
p;            =
;            =
            &=
nbsp;           &n=
bsp;           &nb=
sp;           &nbs=
p; =

 
 
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the =
time of submission
until the htmlized version and =
diff are available at =
tools.ietf.org.
 
The =
IETF Secretariat
 

 

 

------=_NextPart_000_0060_01D095A6.81DA9500-- From nobody Sun May 24 16:25:38 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D91231A01A8 for ; Sun, 24 May 2015 16:25:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CrCPdpgzOtSL for ; Sun, 24 May 2015 16:25:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mgwym04.jp.fujitsu.com (mgwym04.jp.fujitsu.com [211.128.242.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53B181A026C for ; Sun, 24 May 2015 16:25:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yt-mxq.gw.nic.fujitsu.com (unknown [192.168.229.66]) by mgwym04.jp.fujitsu.com with smtp id 41b7_2894_efb36a49_8ed0_4042_9af3_a5eef07eafed; Mon, 25 May 2015 08:25:24 +0900 Received: from dm.kawasaki.flab.fujitsu.co.jp (dm.kawasaki.flab.fujitsu.co.jp [10.25.192.105]) by yt-mxq.gw.nic.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB7B9AC036E; Mon, 25 May 2015 08:25:22 +0900 (JST) X-SecurityPolicyCheck: OK by SHieldMailChecker v2.3.2 X-SHieldMailCheckerPolicyVersion: FJ-ISEC-20140924-1 X-SHieldMailCheckerMailID: 6ba6d3093956449a8d08495ef62c380b Message-ID: <55625E13.104@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 08:26:11 +0900 From: Yuji Tochio User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: adrian@olddog.co.uk References: <20150427073131.7037.78860.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <553DE7EE.3010402@jp.fujitsu.com> <005f01d0959e$1ee06c20$5ca14460$@olddog.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <005f01d0959e$1ee06c20$5ca14460$@olddog.co.uk> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050607030109020705050506" X-TM-AS-MML: disable Archived-At: Cc: lime@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lime] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis-03.txt X-BeenThere: lime@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Layer Independent OAM Management in Multi-Layer Environment \(LIME\) discussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 23:25:37 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050607030109020705050506 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Adrian OK I will re-post as draft-txh-lime-gap-analysis-00 soon. Regards, Yuji On 2015/05/24 6:19, Adrian Farrel wrote: > > Yuji, > > Thanks for keeping this up-to-date. > > Would it be possible to re-post it as draft-txh-lime-gap-analysis so that the document shows up as a LIME document? > > Cheers, > > Adrian > > *From:*Lime [mailto:lime-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Yuji Tochio > *Sent:* 27 April 2015 08:41 > *To:* lime@ietf.org > *Subject:* [Lime] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis-03.txt > > Hi all, > > FYI: > It is just to update some references (published year) and add [draft-lam-lime-summary-l0-l2] for section 3.8. > > Regards, Yuji > > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > > *Subject: * > > > > New Version Notification for draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis-03.txt > > *Date: * > > > > Mon, 27 Apr 2015 00:31:31 -0700 > > *From: * > > > > internet-drafts@ietf.org > > *To: * > > > > Liang Xia (Frank) , Liang Xia , > Yuji Tochio , Huub van Helvoort , Huub van Helvoort > , Yuji Tochio > > A new version of I-D, draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis-03.txt > has been successfully submitted by Yuji Tochio and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Name: draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis > Revision: 03 > Title: Gap Analysis for Layer and Technology Independent OAM Management in the Multi-Layer Environment > Document date: 2015-04-27 > Group: Individual Submission > Pages: 12 > URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis-03.txt > Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis/ > Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis-03 > Diff: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis-03 > > Abstract: > This draft analyses the existing management plane OAM related works > in different SDOs, against the key objectives of Layer Independent > OAM Management (LIME), to find the gap between them. The results can > be used as the guidance for further work. This gap analysis is not > targeted at L0-L2 transport OAM in ITU-T, either technology specific > or generic across those technologies. Rather, it is intended to > leverage knowledge from that domain for the benefit of developing > generic layer independent OAM management for L3-L7 (and L2.5 MPLS > OAM). > > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > The IETF Secretariat > > --------------050607030109020705050506 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hi Adrian

OK I will re-post as draft-txh-lime-gap-analysis-00 soon.

Regards, Yuji

On 2015/05/24 6:19, Adrian Farrel wrote:

Yuji,

 

Thanks for keeping this up-to-date.

Would it be possible to re-post it as draft-txh-lime-gap-analysis so that the document shows up as a LIME document?

 

Cheers,

Adrian

 

From: Lime [mailto:lime-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Yuji Tochio
Sent: 27 April 2015 08:41
To: lime@ietf.org
Subject: [Lime] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis-03.txt

 

Hi all,

FYI:
It is just to update some references (published year) and add [draft-lam-lime-summary-l0-l2] for section 3.8.

Regards, Yuji



-------- Forwarded Message --------

Subject:

New Version Notification for draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis-03.txt

Date:

Mon, 27 Apr 2015 00:31:31 -0700

From:

internet-drafts@ietf.org

To:

Liang Xia (Frank) <frank.xialiang@huawei.com>, Liang Xia <frank.xialiang@huawei.com>, Yuji Tochio <tochio@jp.fujitsu.com>, Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com>, Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com>, Yuji Tochio <tochio@jp.fujitsu.com>

 

A new version of I-D, draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis-03.txt
has been successfully submitted by Yuji Tochio and posted to the
IETF repository.
 
Name:         draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis
Revision:     03
Title:        Gap Analysis for Layer and Technology Independent OAM Management in the Multi-Layer Environment
Document date: 2015-04-27
Group:        Individual Submission
Pages:        12
URL:            http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis-03.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis/
Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis-03
Diff:           http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis-03
 
Abstract:
   This draft analyses the existing management plane OAM related works
   in different SDOs, against the key objectives of Layer Independent
   OAM Management (LIME), to find the gap between them.  The results can
   be used as the guidance for further work.  This gap analysis is not
   targeted at L0-L2 transport OAM in ITU-T, either technology specific
   or generic across those technologies.  Rather, it is intended to
   leverage knowledge from that domain for the benefit of developing
   generic layer independent OAM management for L3-L7 (and L2.5 MPLS
   OAM).
 
                                                                                  
 
 
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
 
The IETF Secretariat
 

 

 


--------------050607030109020705050506-- From nobody Tue May 26 02:58:44 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: lime@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEB701B2A5A for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 02:58:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id owWEMBJX6dfv for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 02:58:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mgwkm03.jp.fujitsu.com (mgwkm03.jp.fujitsu.com [202.219.69.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C86771B2A58 for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 02:58:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kw-mxq.gw.nic.fujitsu.com (unknown [192.168.231.130]) by mgwkm03.jp.fujitsu.com with smtp id 14a0_e1e7_01d26c9f_0ed2_4bc9_8783_0e742c57623f; Tue, 26 May 2015 18:58:36 +0900 Received: from dm.kawasaki.flab.fujitsu.co.jp (dm.kawasaki.flab.fujitsu.co.jp [10.25.192.105]) by kw-mxq.gw.nic.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 856B0AC04AE for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 18:58:36 +0900 (JST) X-SecurityPolicyCheck: OK by SHieldMailChecker v2.3.2 X-SHieldMailCheckerPolicyVersion: FJ-ISEC-20140924-1 X-SHieldMailCheckerMailID: c27dd395cf734a84ba3715758bd87b0d Message-ID: <556443F3.9020708@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 18:59:15 +0900 From: Yuji Tochio User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "lime@ietf.org" References: <20150526094754.8959.12542.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20150526094754.8959.12542.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20150526094754.8959.12542.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060105070102030101060506" X-TM-AS-MML: disable Archived-At: Subject: [Lime] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-txh-lime-gap-analysis-00.txt X-BeenThere: lime@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Layer Independent OAM Management in Multi-Layer Environment \(LIME\) discussion list." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 09:58:42 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060105070102030101060506 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi all, FYI: Just re-post per Adrian's suggestion. (It is same draft as draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis-03.) Thanks, Yuji -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: I-D Action: draft-txh-lime-gap-analysis-00.txt Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 02:47:54 -0700 From: internet-drafts@ietf.org Reply-To: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. Title : Gap Analysis for Layer and Technology Independent OAM Management in the Multi-Layer Environment Authors : Yuji Tochio Huub van Helvoort Liang (Frank) Xia Filename : draft-txh-lime-gap-analysis-00.txt Pages : 12 Date : 2015-05-26 Abstract: This draft analyses the existing management plane OAM related works in different SDOs, against the key objectives of Layer Independent OAM Management (LIME), to find the gap between them. The results can be used as the guidance for further work. This gap analysis is not targeted at L0-L2 transport OAM in ITU-T, either technology specific or generic across those technologies. Rather, it is intended to leverage knowledge from that domain for the benefit of developing generic layer independent OAM management for L3-L7 (and L2.5 MPLS OAM). The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-txh-lime-gap-analysis/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-txh-lime-gap-analysis-00 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ I-D-Announce mailing list I-D-Announce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt --------------060105070102030101060506 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-2022-jp Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi all,

FYI: Just re-post per Adrian's suggestion.
(It is same draft as draft-txh-opsawg-lime-gap-analysis-03.)

Thanks, Yuji

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: I-D Action: draft-txh-lime-gap-analysis-00.txt
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 02:47:54 -0700
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
Reply-To: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org 


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.


        Title           : Gap Analysis for Layer and Technology Independent OAM Management in the Multi-Layer Environment
        Authors         : Yuji Tochio
                          Huub van Helvoort
                          Liang (Frank) Xia
	Filename        : draft-txh-lime-gap-analysis-00.txt
	Pages           : 12
	Date            : 2015-05-26

Abstract:
   This draft analyses the existing management plane OAM related works
   in different SDOs, against the key objectives of Layer Independent
   OAM Management (LIME), to find the gap between them.  The results can
   be used as the guidance for further work.  This gap analysis is not
   targeted at L0-L2 transport OAM in ITU-T, either technology specific
   or generic across those technologies.  Rather, it is intended to
   leverage knowledge from that domain for the benefit of developing
   generic layer independent OAM management for L3-L7 (and L2.5 MPLS
   OAM).


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-txh-lime-gap-analysis/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-txh-lime-gap-analysis-00


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

_______________________________________________
I-D-Announce mailing list
I-D-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt


--------------060105070102030101060506--