Subject: [Lime] draft-kumar-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-01

From: Ronald Bonica <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 02:56:01 +0000

Folks,

Thanks for submitting draft-kumar-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-01. While it is a good start, I think that there are a few major issues. These are:

- The description of the model provided in Section 3 doesn't map to the actual model provided in 3.6
- The oper object provides statistics on a set of long-lived OAM sessions. This should be made clear in the document.
- the oper object contains cc-ipv4-sessions-statistics and cc-ipv6-sessions-statistics. These have identical attributes. They might want to be collapsed into one
- the same comment applies under test-point-locations for IPv4-location and IPv6-location 
- Is FEC really an attribute of TP-location?
- Under IPv4-location and IPv6-location, does it really make sense to enumerate all of the tools? We probably won't get the list right. Maybe we should leave this table empty and allow it to be augmented by the folks who want to build onto this Yang model?

/as individual contributor
Ron Bonica