From stpeter@stpeter.im Wed Dec 7 18:51:07 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3022021F87D3 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 18:51:07 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.585 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.585 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.014, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fYc9xdnc0Uf6 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 18:51:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35DA421F8797 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 18:51:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from squire.local (unknown [216.17.140.216]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 40E9342306; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 19:58:24 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <4EE02618.9070403@stpeter.im> Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 19:51:04 -0700 From: Peter Saint-Andre User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mike amundsen References: <20111008172352.17099.58145.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3 OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: link-relations@ietf.org Subject: Re: [link-relations] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-amundsen-item-and-collection-link-relations-03.txt X-BeenThere: link-relations@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 02:51:07 -0000 Mike, I'm sponsoring draft-ohye-canonical-link-relation for a similar purpose, so I'd be happy to sponsor your document as well. On 10/8/11 11:51 AM, mike amundsen wrote: > Added Status indicator (Informational). > > Looking for feedback before I present as an Independent Submission to > rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org > > mca > http://amundsen.com/blog/ > http://twitter.com@mamund > http://mamund.com/foaf.rdf#me > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: > Date: Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 13:23 > Subject: New Version Notification for > draft-amundsen-item-and-collection-link-relations-03.txt > To: mca@amundsen.com > Cc: mca@amundsen.com > > > A new version of I-D, > draft-amundsen-item-and-collection-link-relations-03.txt has been > successfully submitted by Mike Amundsen and posted to the IETF > repository. > > Filename: draft-amundsen-item-and-collection-link-relations > Revision: 03 > Title: The Item and Collection Link Relations > Creation date: 2011-10-08 > WG ID: Individual Submission > Number of pages: 5 > > Abstract: > RFC 5988 [RFC5988] standardized a means of indicating the > relationships between resources on the Web. This specification > defines a pair of reciprocal link relation types that may be used to > express the relationship between a collection and its members. > > Editorial Note (To be removed by RFC Editor) > > Distribution of this document is unlimited. Comments should be sent > to the IETF Apps-Discuss mailing list (see > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>). > > > > > The IETF Secretariat > _______________________________________________ > link-relations mailing list > link-relations@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ From mca@amundsen.com Wed Dec 7 19:31:46 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F0B311E8082 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 19:31:46 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.865 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.865 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.186, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD=2.297, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8IyVGBLaOS7D for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 19:31:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8EE121F85A8 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 19:31:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by dajz8 with SMTP id z8so1673825daj.31 for ; Wed, 07 Dec 2011 19:31:44 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.29.37 with SMTP id g5mr11178252pbh.122.1323315104425; Wed, 07 Dec 2011 19:31:44 -0800 (PST) Sender: mca@amundsen.com Received: by 10.142.196.20 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 19:31:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4EE02618.9070403@stpeter.im> References: <20111008172352.17099.58145.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4EE02618.9070403@stpeter.im> Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 22:31:44 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: lKuObLqAeIYyvkn1VauivW2iXX0 Message-ID: From: mike amundsen To: Peter Saint-Andre Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec520efdbb9a6e004b38c4e74 Cc: link-relations@ietf.org Subject: Re: [link-relations] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-amundsen-item-and-collection-link-relations-03.txt X-BeenThere: link-relations@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 03:31:46 -0000 --bcaec520efdbb9a6e004b38c4e74 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Peter: Thanks for offering to sponsor the document. What do you need from me to move forward? mca http://amundsen.com/blog/ http://twitter.com@mamund http://mamund.com/foaf.rdf#me On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 21:51, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > Mike, I'm sponsoring draft-ohye-canonical-link-relation for a similar > purpose, so I'd be happy to sponsor your document as well. > > On 10/8/11 11:51 AM, mike amundsen wrote: > > Added Status indicator (Informational). > > > > Looking for feedback before I present as an Independent Submission to > > rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org > > > > mca > > http://amundsen.com/blog/ > > http://twitter.com@mamund > > http://mamund.com/foaf.rdf#me > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > From: > > Date: Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 13:23 > > Subject: New Version Notification for > > draft-amundsen-item-and-collection-link-relations-03.txt > > To: mca@amundsen.com > > Cc: mca@amundsen.com > > > > > > A new version of I-D, > > draft-amundsen-item-and-collection-link-relations-03.txt has been > > successfully submitted by Mike Amundsen and posted to the IETF > > repository. > > > > Filename: draft-amundsen-item-and-collection-link-relations > > Revision: 03 > > Title: The Item and Collection Link Relations > > Creation date: 2011-10-08 > > WG ID: Individual Submission > > Number of pages: 5 > > > > Abstract: > > RFC 5988 [RFC5988] standardized a means of indicating the > > relationships between resources on the Web. This specification > > defines a pair of reciprocal link relation types that may be used to > > express the relationship between a collection and its members. > > > > Editorial Note (To be removed by RFC Editor) > > > > Distribution of this document is unlimited. Comments should be sent > > to the IETF Apps-Discuss mailing list (see > > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>). > > > > > > > > > > The IETF Secretariat > > _______________________________________________ > > link-relations mailing list > > link-relations@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations > > > -- > Peter Saint-Andre > https://stpeter.im/ > > > --bcaec520efdbb9a6e004b38c4e74 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Peter:

Thanks for offering to sponsor the document.

What do you need from me to move forward?
mca
http://amundsen.com/blog/
http://twitter.com@mam= und
http://m= amund.com/foaf.rdf#me




On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 21:51, Peter Sain= t-Andre <stpeter= @stpeter.im> wrote:
Mike, I'm sponsoring draft-ohye-canonical-link-relation for a similar purpose, so I'd be happy to sponsor your document as well.

On 10/8/11 11:51 AM, mike amundsen wrote:
> Added Status indicator (Informational).
>
> Looking for feedback before I present as an Independent Submission to<= br> > rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org >
> mca
> http://amundse= n.com/blog/
> http://twitter.com@mamund
> http://mam= und.com/foaf.rdf#me
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: =A0<internet-draf= ts@ietf.org>
> Date: Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 13:23
> Subject: New Version Notification for
> draft-amundsen-item-and-collection-link-relations-03.txt
> To: mca@amundsen.com
> Cc: mca@amundsen.com
>
>
> A new version of I-D,
> draft-amundsen-item-and-collection-link-relations-03.txt has been
> successfully submitted by Mike Amundsen and posted to the IETF
> repository.
>
> Filename: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0draft-amundsen-item-and-collection-link-relat= ions
> Revision: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A003
> Title: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 The Item and Collection Link Relations
> Creation date: =A0 2011-10-08
> WG ID: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Individual Submission
> Number of pages: 5
>
> Abstract:
> =A0 RFC 5988 [RFC5988] standardized a means of indicating the
> =A0 relationships between resources on the Web. This specification
> =A0 defines a pair of reciprocal link relation types that may be used = to
> =A0 express the relationship between a collection and its members.
>
> Editorial Note (To be removed by RFC Editor)
>
> =A0 Distribution of this document is unlimited. =A0Comments should be = sent
> =A0 to the IETF Apps-Discuss mailing list (see
> =A0 &lt;https:/= /www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss&gt;).
>
>
>
>
> The IETF Secretariat
> ________________________= _______________________
> link-relations mailing list
> link-relations@ietf.org=
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations


--
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


--bcaec520efdbb9a6e004b38c4e74-- From stpeter@stpeter.im Thu Dec 8 09:46:33 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F264821F84C5; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 09:46:32 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -104.149 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.550, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TEFDIvjTRG6w; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 09:46:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01FD921F84B9; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 09:46:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-124.cisco.com (unknown [64.101.72.124]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A8D454236A; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 10:53:51 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <4EE0F7F8.8010308@stpeter.im> Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 10:46:32 -0700 From: Peter Saint-Andre User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mike amundsen References: <20111008172352.17099.58145.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4EE02618.9070403@stpeter.im> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.3 OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" , link-relations@ietf.org Subject: Re: [link-relations] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-amundsen-item-and-collection-link-relations-03.txt X-BeenThere: link-relations@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 17:46:33 -0000 FYI, I've completed my AD evaluation and requested an IETF Last Call on this specification. On 12/7/11 8:31 PM, mike amundsen wrote: > Peter: > > Thanks for offering to sponsor the document. > > What do you need from me to move forward? > > mca > http://amundsen.com/blog/ > http://twitter.com@mamund > http://mamund.com/foaf.rdf#me > > > > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 21:51, Peter Saint-Andre > wrote: > > Mike, I'm sponsoring draft-ohye-canonical-link-relation for a similar > purpose, so I'd be happy to sponsor your document as well. > > On 10/8/11 11:51 AM, mike amundsen wrote: > > Added Status indicator (Informational). > > > > Looking for feedback before I present as an Independent Submission to > > rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org > > > > mca > > http://amundsen.com/blog/ > > http://twitter.com@mamund > > http://mamund.com/foaf.rdf#me > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > From: > > > Date: Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 13:23 > > Subject: New Version Notification for > > draft-amundsen-item-and-collection-link-relations-03.txt > > To: mca@amundsen.com > > Cc: mca@amundsen.com > > > > > > A new version of I-D, > > draft-amundsen-item-and-collection-link-relations-03.txt has been > > successfully submitted by Mike Amundsen and posted to the IETF > > repository. > > > > Filename: draft-amundsen-item-and-collection-link-relations > > Revision: 03 > > Title: The Item and Collection Link Relations > > Creation date: 2011-10-08 > > WG ID: Individual Submission > > Number of pages: 5 > > > > Abstract: > > RFC 5988 [RFC5988] standardized a means of indicating the > > relationships between resources on the Web. This specification > > defines a pair of reciprocal link relation types that may be used to > > express the relationship between a collection and its members. > > > > Editorial Note (To be removed by RFC Editor) > > > > Distribution of this document is unlimited. Comments should be sent > > to the IETF Apps-Discuss mailing list (see > > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss> > ). > > > > > > > > > > The IETF Secretariat > > _______________________________________________ > > link-relations mailing list > > link-relations@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations From mca@amundsen.com Thu Dec 8 09:53:05 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8884721F8551; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 09:53:05 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.319 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.319 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.639, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD=2.297, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x+rQeBWh3cb5; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 09:53:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7BC421F84CD; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 09:53:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by dajz8 with SMTP id z8so2594706daj.31 for ; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 09:53:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.29.37 with SMTP id g5mr17077594pbh.122.1323366784065; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 09:53:04 -0800 (PST) Sender: mca@amundsen.com Received: by 10.142.196.20 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 09:53:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4EE0F7F8.8010308@stpeter.im> References: <20111008172352.17099.58145.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4EE02618.9070403@stpeter.im> <4EE0F7F8.8010308@stpeter.im> Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 12:53:03 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: umnsOtkzO7bdxNJAFWwssBNpTTo Message-ID: From: mike amundsen To: Peter Saint-Andre Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec520efdb1260ce04b39857f5 Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" , link-relations@ietf.org Subject: Re: [link-relations] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-amundsen-item-and-collection-link-relations-03.txt X-BeenThere: link-relations@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 17:53:05 -0000 --bcaec520efdb1260ce04b39857f5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Peter: thanks. mca http://amundsen.com/blog/ http://twitter.com@mamund http://mamund.com/foaf.rdf#me On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:46, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > FYI, I've completed my AD evaluation and requested an IETF Last Call on > this specification. > > On 12/7/11 8:31 PM, mike amundsen wrote: > > Peter: > > > > Thanks for offering to sponsor the document. > > > > What do you need from me to move forward? > > > > mca > > http://amundsen.com/blog/ > > http://twitter.com@mamund > > http://mamund.com/foaf.rdf#me > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 21:51, Peter Saint-Andre > > wrote: > > > > Mike, I'm sponsoring draft-ohye-canonical-link-relation for a similar > > purpose, so I'd be happy to sponsor your document as well. > > > > On 10/8/11 11:51 AM, mike amundsen wrote: > > > Added Status indicator (Informational). > > > > > > Looking for feedback before I present as an Independent Submission > to > > > rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org > > > > > > mca > > > http://amundsen.com/blog/ > > > http://twitter.com@mamund > > > http://mamund.com/foaf.rdf#me > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > > From: >> > > > Date: Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 13:23 > > > Subject: New Version Notification for > > > draft-amundsen-item-and-collection-link-relations-03.txt > > > To: mca@amundsen.com > > > Cc: mca@amundsen.com > > > > > > > > > A new version of I-D, > > > draft-amundsen-item-and-collection-link-relations-03.txt has been > > > successfully submitted by Mike Amundsen and posted to the IETF > > > repository. > > > > > > Filename: draft-amundsen-item-and-collection-link-relations > > > Revision: 03 > > > Title: The Item and Collection Link Relations > > > Creation date: 2011-10-08 > > > WG ID: Individual Submission > > > Number of pages: 5 > > > > > > Abstract: > > > RFC 5988 [RFC5988] standardized a means of indicating the > > > relationships between resources on the Web. This specification > > > defines a pair of reciprocal link relation types that may be > used to > > > express the relationship between a collection and its members. > > > > > > Editorial Note (To be removed by RFC Editor) > > > > > > Distribution of this document is unlimited. Comments should be > sent > > > to the IETF Apps-Discuss mailing list (see > > > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss> > > ). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The IETF Secretariat > > > _______________________________________________ > > > link-relations mailing list > > > link-relations@ietf.org > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations > --bcaec520efdb1260ce04b39857f5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Peter:

thanks.

mca
http://amundsen.com/blog/
<= a href=3D"http://twitter.com" target=3D"_blank">http://twitter.com@mamu= nd
http://mamund.c= om/foaf.rdf#me




On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:46, Peter Sain= t-Andre <stpeter= @stpeter.im> wrote:
FYI, I've completed my AD evaluation and requested an IETF Last Call on=
this specification.

On 12/7/11 8:31 PM, mike amundsen wrote:
> Peter:
>
> Thanks for offering to sponsor the document.
>
> What do you need from me to move forward?
>
> mca
> http://amundse= n.com/blog/
> http://twitter.com@mamund
> http://mam= und.com/foaf.rdf#me
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 21:51, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im
> <mailto:stpeter@stpeter.im>> wrote:
>
> =A0 =A0 Mike, I'm sponsoring draft-ohye-canonical-link-relation fo= r a similar
> =A0 =A0 purpose, so I'd be happy to sponsor your document as well.=
>
> =A0 =A0 On 10/8/11 11:51 AM, mike amundsen wrote:
> =A0 =A0 > Added Status indicator (Informational).
> =A0 =A0 >
> =A0 =A0 > Looking for feedback before I present as an Independent S= ubmission to
> =A0 =A0 > rfc-ise@r= fc-editor.org <mailto:rfc-= ise@rfc-editor.org>
> =A0 =A0 >
> =A0 =A0 > mca
> =A0 =A0 > h= ttp://amundsen.com/blog/
> =A0 =A0 > http://twitter.com@mamund
> =A0 =A0 > http://mamund.com/foaf.rdf#me
> =A0 =A0 >
> =A0 =A0 >
> =A0 =A0 >
> =A0 =A0 >
> =A0 =A0 >
> =A0 =A0 >
> =A0 =A0 > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> =A0 =A0 > From: =A0<internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>>
> =A0 =A0 > Date: Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 13:23
> =A0 =A0 > Subject: New Version Notification for
> =A0 =A0 > draft-amundsen-item-and-collection-link-relations-03.txt<= br>
> =A0 =A0 > To: mca@amundsen.com <mailto:mca@amundsen.com>
> =A0 =A0 > Cc: mca@amundsen.com<= /a> <mailto:mca@amundsen.com>=
> =A0 =A0 >
> =A0 =A0 >
> =A0 =A0 > A new version of I-D,
> =A0 =A0 > draft-amundsen-item-and-collection-link-relations-03.txt = has been
> =A0 =A0 > successfully submitted by Mike Amundsen and posted to the= IETF
> =A0 =A0 > repository.
> =A0 =A0 >
> =A0 =A0 > Filename: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0draft-amundsen-item-and-collecti= on-link-relations
> =A0 =A0 > Revision: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A003
> =A0 =A0 > Title: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 The Item and Collection Link R= elations
> =A0 =A0 > Creation date: =A0 2011-10-08
> =A0 =A0 > WG ID: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Individual Submission
> =A0 =A0 > Number of pages: 5
> =A0 =A0 >
> =A0 =A0 > Abstract:
> =A0 =A0 > =A0 RFC 5988 [RFC5988] standardized a means of indicating= the
> =A0 =A0 > =A0 relationships between resources on the Web. This spec= ification
> =A0 =A0 > =A0 defines a pair of reciprocal link relation types that= may be used to
> =A0 =A0 > =A0 express the relationship between a collection and its= members.
> =A0 =A0 >
> =A0 =A0 > Editorial Note (To be removed by RFC Editor)
> =A0 =A0 >
> =A0 =A0 > =A0 Distribution of this document is unlimited. =A0Commen= ts should be sent
> =A0 =A0 > =A0 to the IETF Apps-Discuss mailing list (see
> =A0 =A0 > =A0 &lt;https://www.ietf.org/mailman/lis= tinfo/apps-discuss&gt;
> =A0 =A0 <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-di= scuss&gt;>).
> =A0 =A0 >
> =A0 =A0 >
> =A0 =A0 >
> =A0 =A0 >
> =A0 =A0 > The IETF Secretariat
> =A0 =A0 > _______________________________________________
> =A0 =A0 > link-relations mailing list
> =A0 =A0 > li= nk-relations@ietf.org <mailto:link-relations@ietf.org>
> =A0 =A0 > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relati= ons

--bcaec520efdb1260ce04b39857f5-- From michiel@unhosted.org Thu Dec 15 20:53:36 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7705221F8462 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 20:53:36 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.976 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PzDTEw7tYSvZ for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 20:53:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qy0-f172.google.com (mail-qy0-f172.google.com [209.85.216.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ECE421F8461 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 20:53:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by qcsf15 with SMTP id f15so1951065qcs.31 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 20:53:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.211.66 with SMTP id gn2mr9737773qab.14.1324011214310; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 20:53:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.32.204 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 20:53:34 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [113.169.210.140] Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:53:34 +0700 Message-ID: From: Michiel de Jong To: link-relations@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf300fad5d1b8b3304b42e62cc X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 22:47:40 -0800 Subject: [link-relations] NEW RELATION - remoteStorage X-BeenThere: link-relations@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 04:53:36 -0000 --20cf300fad5d1b8b3304b42e62cc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 hi! thanks to the discussion started by elf-pavlik on the webfinger ML, I found this registry. I would like to register: o Relation Name: remoteStorage o Description: Points to remote data storage, owned by the user, and accessible from the web. o Reference: http://www.w3.org/community/unhosted/wiki/RemoteStorage o Notes: - o Application Data: - Let me know if you need anything else, or what the procedure is from here on. Cheers! Michiel Unhosted.org --20cf300fad5d1b8b3304b42e62cc Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hi! thanks to the discussion started by elf-pavlik on the webfinger ML, I f= ound this registry. I would like to register:

   o  Relation Name: remoteStorage

   o  Description: Points to remote data storage, owned by the user, and ac=
cessible from the web.

   o  Reference: http://www.w3.org/community/unhosted/wiki/RemoteStorage

   o  Notes: -

   o  Application Data: -


Let me know if you need anything else,=
 or what the procedure is from here on.


Cheers!
Michiel
Un=
hosted.org
--20cf300fad5d1b8b3304b42e62cc-- From julian.reschke@gmx.de Fri Dec 16 01:31:35 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A93B21F8A70 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 01:31:35 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -104.399 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.800, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OUiQyTahqMH9 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 01:31:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8215221F888A for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 01:31:34 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2011 09:31:31 -0000 Received: from p3EE2719A.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.36]) [62.226.113.154] by mail.gmx.net (mp024) with SMTP; 16 Dec 2011 10:31:31 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1915285 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+TjE4eruKTXOU4MUgE6IYEYnE2WKRDfkBXTUHurS kORHYgXKeiuHPf Message-ID: <4EEB0FEB.20901@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:31:23 +0100 From: Julian Reschke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michiel de Jong References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: link-relations@ietf.org Subject: Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION - remoteStorage X-BeenThere: link-relations@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 09:31:35 -0000 On 2011-12-16 05:53, Michiel de Jong wrote: > hi! thanks to the discussion started by elf-pavlik on the webfinger ML, > I found this registry. I would like to register: > > o Relation Name: remoteStorage > > o Description: Points to remote data storage, owned by the user, and accessible from the web. > > o Reference:http://www.w3.org/community/unhosted/wiki/RemoteStorage > > o Notes: - > > o Application Data: - > > > Let me know if you need anything else, or what the procedure is from here on. > ... I haven't looked at the actual definition yet but here are two editorial comments: - link relations are compared case-insensitively, so there's no point to camel-case here - the registration procedure asks for a "permanent and readily available" specification; I'm not convinced that a Wiki page is suited, unless there are procedures in place that ensure that... Best regards, Julian From michiel@unhosted.org Fri Dec 16 05:48:31 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2424B21F8440 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 05:48:31 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.976 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3CDzOaw9Rr+b for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 05:48:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qw0-f51.google.com (mail-qw0-f51.google.com [209.85.216.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A7CF21F843E for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 05:48:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by qadz3 with SMTP id z3so2049020qad.10 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 05:48:29 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.31.66 with SMTP id x2mr11900415qac.27.1324043309786; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 05:48:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.32.204 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 05:48:29 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [113.169.217.245] In-Reply-To: <4EEB0FEB.20901@gmx.de> References: <4EEB0FEB.20901@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:48:29 +0700 Message-ID: From: Michiel de Jong To: Julian Reschke Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3020759025a75404b435db3c Cc: link-relations@ietf.org Subject: Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION - remoteStorage X-BeenThere: link-relations@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 13:48:31 -0000 --20cf3020759025a75404b435db3c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2011-12-16 05:53, Michiel de Jong wrote: > >> hi! thanks to the discussion started by elf-pavlik on the webfinger ML, >> I found this registry. I would like to register: >> >> o Relation Name: remoteStorage >> >> o Description: Points to remote data storage, owned by the user, and >> accessible from the web. >> >> o Reference:http://www.w3.org/**community/unhosted/wiki/** >> RemoteStorage >> >> o Notes: - >> >> o Application Data: - >> >> >> Let me know if you need anything else, or what the procedure is from here >> on. >> ... >> > > I haven't looked at the actual definition yet but here are two editorial > comments: > > - link relations are compared case-insensitively, so there's no point to > camel-case here > fair enough - we use the camel-case because localStorage and sessionStorage also use them, so remoteStorage is an extension of that. but here the relation name can be defined as remotestorage if that's what the spec requires - i think it will still be human-readable without problems. > - the registration procedure asks for a "permanent and readily available" > specification; I'm not convinced that a Wiki page is suited, unless there > are procedures in place that ensure that... > > ok, then please use http://www.w3.org/community/unhosted/wiki/index.php?title=RemoteStorage&oldid=47which is the currently "frozen" version. in the future (maybe next year) we might get a nicer address from w3c, but since we're a "w3c cg" community group only, at the moment it's the best we can do. sorry! i hope it's ok with you this way. > Best regards, Julian > thanks a lot! Michiel --20cf3020759025a75404b435db3c Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Julian = Reschke <juli= an.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
On 2011-12-16 05:53, Michiel de Jon= g wrote:
hi! thanks to the discussion started by elf-pavlik on the webfinger ML,
I found this registry. I would like to register:

=A0 =A0o =A0Relation Name: remoteStorage

=A0 =A0o =A0Description: Points to remote data storage, owned by the user,= and accessible from the web.

=A0 =A0o =A0Reference:http://www.w3.org/community/unhost= ed/wiki/RemoteStorage

=A0 =A0o =A0Notes: -

=A0 =A0o =A0Application Data: -


Let me know if you need anything else, or what the procedure is from here o= n.
...

I haven't looked at the actual definition yet but here are two editoria= l comments:

- link relations are compared case-insensitively, so there's no point t= o camel-case here

fair enough - we use the camel-c= ase because localStorage and sessionStorage also use them, so remoteStorage= is an extension of that. but here the relation name can be defined as remo= testorage if that's what the spec requires - i think it will still be h= uman-readable without problems.


- the registration procedure asks for a "permanent and readily availab= le" specification; I'm not convinced that a Wiki page is suited, u= nless there are procedures in place that ensure that...


ok, then please use htt= p://www.w3.org/community/unhosted/wiki/index.php?title=3DRemoteStorage&= oldid=3D47 which is the currently "frozen" version. in the fu= ture (maybe next year) we might get a nicer address from w3c, but since we&= #39;re a "w3c cg" community group only, at the moment it's th= e best we can do. sorry! i hope it's ok with you this way.
=A0
Best regards, Julian

thanks a lot!
Michiel

--20cf3020759025a75404b435db3c-- From julian.reschke@gmx.de Fri Dec 16 11:13:02 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 553E011E8093 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:13:02 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -104.306 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.306 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.707, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S-xXEyG5PNli for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:13:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 31A2111E8089 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:13:01 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2011 19:12:56 -0000 Received: from p3EE27A3D.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.36]) [62.226.122.61] by mail.gmx.net (mp024) with SMTP; 16 Dec 2011 20:12:56 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1915285 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+3/h1gd+e3ymSq3/87CE7NkH9BwXhtMvjX5nwu9l XqGWciIFUuE9zf Message-ID: <4EEB982C.8040308@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:12:44 +0100 From: Julian Reschke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michiel de Jong References: <4EEB0FEB.20901@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: link-relations@ietf.org Subject: Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION - remoteStorage X-BeenThere: link-relations@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 19:13:02 -0000 On 2011-12-16 14:48, Michiel de Jong wrote: > ... > fair enough - we use the camel-case because localStorage and > sessionStorage also use them, so remoteStorage is an extension of that. > but here the relation name can be defined as remotestorage if that's > what the spec requires - i think it will still be human-readable without > problems. > ... Yes. > - the registration procedure asks for a "permanent and readily > available" specification; I'm not convinced that a Wiki page is > suited, unless there are procedures in place that ensure that... > > > ok, then please use > http://www.w3.org/community/unhosted/wiki/index.php?title=RemoteStorage&oldid=47 > > which is the currently "frozen" version. in the future (maybe next year) > we might get a nicer address from w3c, but since we're a "w3c cg" > community group only, at the moment it's the best we can do. sorry! i > hope it's ok with you this way. > ... Not sure I like this as a stable reference. If the whole point of this is to reserve the name for now, don't worry, it is: . Now to the registration itself: "Points to remote data storage, owned by the user, and accessible from the web." Who's "the user" here? Also, on the Wiki: > I note that this is non-conforming. It has all kinds of undefined attributes, and doesn't have @href. Finally, how would the link above appear in an HTTP Link header fields? Best regards, Julian From michiel@unhosted.org Mon Dec 19 02:18:42 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E644A21F8510 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 02:18:42 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.376 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.376 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bWVneP4cZTLn for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 02:18:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qw0-f44.google.com (mail-qw0-f44.google.com [209.85.216.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A2F21F84D8 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 02:18:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by qadb15 with SMTP id b15so2266719qad.10 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 02:18:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.31.202 with SMTP id z10mr362595qac.96.1324289921091; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 02:18:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.102.4 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 02:18:40 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [113.169.217.245] In-Reply-To: <4EEB982C.8040308@gmx.de> References: <4EEB0FEB.20901@gmx.de> <4EEB982C.8040308@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:18:40 +0700 Message-ID: From: Michiel de Jong To: Julian Reschke Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3074b14c5387dd04b46f4695 Cc: Melvin Carvalho , link-relations@ietf.org Subject: Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION - remoteStorage X-BeenThere: link-relations@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:18:43 -0000 --20cf3074b14c5387dd04b46f4695 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 thanks for the pointers! we will work on fixing these issues and report back at a later time. and thanks also for already reserving the name by the way. On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2011-12-16 14:48, Michiel de Jong wrote: > >> ... >> >> fair enough - we use the camel-case because localStorage and >> sessionStorage also use them, so remoteStorage is an extension of that. >> but here the relation name can be defined as remotestorage if that's >> what the spec requires - i think it will still be human-readable without >> problems. >> ... >> > > Yes. > > - the registration procedure asks for a "permanent and readily >> available" specification; I'm not convinced that a Wiki page is >> suited, unless there are procedures in place that ensure that... >> >> >> ok, then please use >> http://www.w3.org/community/**unhosted/wiki/index.php?title=** >> RemoteStorage&oldid=47 >> > RemoteStorage&oldid=47 >> > >> which is the currently "frozen" version. in the future (maybe next year) >> we might get a nicer address from w3c, but since we're a "w3c cg" >> community group only, at the moment it's the best we can do. sorry! i >> hope it's ok with you this way. >> ... >> > > Not sure I like this as a stable reference. > > If the whole point of this is to reserve the name for now, don't worry, it > is: > >. > > Now to the registration itself: > > > "Points to remote data storage, owned by the user, and accessible from the > web." > > Who's "the user" here? > > Also, on the Wiki: > > > > >> > > I note that this is non-conforming. It has all kinds of undefined > attributes, and doesn't have @href. > > Finally, how would the link above appear in an HTTP Link header fields? > > Best regards, Julian > --20cf3074b14c5387dd04b46f4695 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable thanks for the pointers! we will work on fixing these issues and report bac= k at a later time.

and thanks also for already reserving the name by= the way.

On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 2:12 AM= , Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
On 2011-12-16 14:48, Michiel de Jong wrote:<= br>
...

fair enough - we use the camel-case because localStorage and
sessionStorage also use them, so remoteStorage is an extension of that.
but here the relation name can be defined as remotestorage if that's what the spec requires - i think it will still be human-readable without problems.
...

Yes.

=A0 =A0- the registration procedure asks for a "permanent and readily=
=A0 =A0available" specification; I'm not convinced that a Wiki pa= ge is
=A0 =A0suited, unless there are procedures in place that ensure that...

ok, then please use
http://www.w3.org/community/= unhosted/wiki/index.php?title=3DRemoteStorage&oldid=3D47=
<http://www.w3.org/community= /unhosted/wiki/index.php?title=3DRemoteStorage&oldid=3D47= >
which is the currently "frozen" version. in the future (maybe nex= t year)
we might get a nicer address from w3c, but since we're a "w3c cg&q= uot;
community group only, at the moment it's the best we can do. sorry! i hope it's ok with you this way.
...

Not sure I like this as a stable reference.

If the whole point of this is to reserve the name for now, don't worry,= it is: <http://paramsr.us/tracker/issue29>.

Now to the registration itself:


"Points to remote data storage, owned by the user, and accessible from= the web."

Who's "the user" here?

Also, on the Wiki:

<Link rel=3D"remoteStorage" template=3D"$TEMPLATE" a= pi=3D"$API" auth=3D"$AUTH" ></Link>

I note that this is non-conforming. It has all kinds of undefined attribute= s, and doesn't have @href.

Finally, how would the link above appear in an HTTP Link header fields?

Best regards, Julian

--20cf3074b14c5387dd04b46f4695--