From nobody Thu Sep 1 11:27:13 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EAD712D59D for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 11:27:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AC_DIV_BONANZA=0.001, BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AqfWdulhzON5 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 11:27:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.chartercom.com (mail.chartercom.com [24.176.92.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 136B412D59E for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 11:27:05 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.30,268,1470718800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="37607081" Received: from unknown (HELO SC58MEXGP009.CORP.CHARTERCOM.com) ([172.24.253.137]) by mail.chartercom.com with ESMTP; 01 Sep 2016 13:25:27 -0500 Received: from SC58MEXGP008.CORP.CHARTERCOM.COM (172.24.253.136) by SC58MEXGP009.CORP.CHARTERCOM.com (172.24.253.137) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 13:27:04 -0500 Received: from SC58MEXGP008.CORP.CHARTERCOM.COM ([fe80::719f:6d16:1ed5:5b5c]) by SC58MEXGP008.CORP.CHARTERCOM.com ([fe80::719f:6d16:1ed5:5b5c%19]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 13:27:04 -0500 From: "Weil, Jason A" To: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" , "lmap@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Virtual Interim Meeting Poll Thread-Index: AQHSA77PVAJjCR4wUEWbyBdYh5W6AaBjd7iwgAGOaoA= Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 18:27:03 +0000 Message-ID: References: <4AF73AA205019A4C8A1DDD32C034631D4598B62B17@NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com> In-Reply-To: <4AF73AA205019A4C8A1DDD32C034631D4598B62B17@NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [172.24.253.243] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D3EDEAE65D5CBjasonweilchartercom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [lmap] Virtual Interim Meeting Poll X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 18:27:11 -0000 --_000_D3EDEAE65D5CBjasonweilchartercom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think we should be ok with 1 hour unless someone has a good reason to ext= end it to 90 mins. Jason From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" > Date: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 at 1:42 PM To: Jason Weil >, "lm= ap@ietf.org" > Subject: RE: Virtual Interim Meeting Poll Hi Jason, Will this be a 1 hour meeting? sorry, but it makes a difference, Al From: lmap [mailto:lmap-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Weil, Jason A Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 3:35 PM To: lmap@ietf.org Subject: [lmap] Virtual Interim Meeting Poll LMAP Participants, Please take a few minutes to fill out the poll at the link provided for a p= otential virtual meeting before IETF 97. If there are a number of West Coas= t USA participants interested in attending let me know and I will add an 11= 00EST option. http://doodle.com/poll/hw8shm3g4h42s7gy Thanks, Jason From: lmap > on behalf = of Dan Romascanu > Date: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 at 9:49 AM To: "lmap@ietf.org" > Subject: [lmap] wg status and way ahead Resent-From: Jason Weil > Hi, We (the chairs) had a conference call with our AD (Alissa) today to discuss= WG status and next steps. Here are the main points. - in Berlin we agreed to submit revised versions of the information model a= nd data model I-Ds and send them to a second WGLC. The IM I-D was submitted= . Juergen, can you update the WG on the status of the DM model? - 2nd WGLC - to be run in September. - we shall plan for a virtual interim - target dates 10/5, 10/6, 10/7, or 1= 0/10. You shall see soon a doodle poll from Jason; if unnecessary we shall = cancel - we shall plan for a 90 min meeting at IETF 97; if unnecessary we shall ca= ncel - we want to have the documents reviewed by a broader constituency; please = use your contacts to send them to review to operators in the different comm= unities (e.g. cable access industry) or regulators. we shall also request a= n early OPS-DIR review Please answer and comment on this plan. Regards, Jason and Dan --_000_D3EDEAE65D5CBjasonweilchartercom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <56FD5B8616F1E94A973C5FFFB333BFF5@chartercom.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I think we should be ok with 1 hour unless someone has a good reason t= o extend it to 90 mins. 

Jason

From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)&q= uot; <acmorton@att.com>
Date: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 at= 1:42 PM
To: Jason Weil <jason.weil@charter.com>, "lmap@ietf.org" <lmap@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Virtual Interim Meetin= g Poll

Hi Jason,

Will this be a 1 hour meeting?

 

sorry, but it makes a difference,<= /p>

Al

 

From: lmap [mai= lto:lmap-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Weil, Jason A
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 3:35 PM
To: lmap@ietf.org
Subject: [lmap] Virtual Interim Meeting Poll

 

LMAP Participants,

 

Please take a few minutes to fill out the po= ll at the link provided for a potential virtual meeting before IETF 97. If = there are a number of West Coast USA participants interested in attending let me know and I will add an 1100EST= option.

 

 

Thanks,

Jason

 

From: lmap <lmap-bou= nces@ietf.org> on behalf of Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 at 9:49 AM
To: "lmap@ietf.org" &= lt;lmap@ietf.org>
Subject: [lmap] wg status and way ahead
Resent-From: Jason Weil <jason.weil@twcable.com>

 

Hi,

We (the chair= s) had a conference call with our AD (Alissa) today to discuss WG status an= d next steps. Here are the main points.

- in Berlin we agreed to submit revised vers= ions of the information model and data model I-Ds and send them to a second= WGLC. The IM I-D was submitted. Juergen, can you update the WG on the status of the DM model?

- 2nd WGLC - to be run in September. 

- we shall plan for a virtual interim - targ= et dates 10/5, 10/6, 10/7, or 10/10. You shall see soon a doodle poll from = Jason; if unnecessary we shall cancel

- we shall plan for a 90 min meeting at IETF= 97; if unnecessary we shall cancel

- we want to = have the documents reviewed by a broader constituency; please use your cont= acts to send them to review to operators in the different communities (e.g. cable access industry) or regulators. w= e shall also request an early OPS-DIR review

Please answer= and comment on this plan.

Regards,

Jason and Dan=

--_000_D3EDEAE65D5CBjasonweilchartercom_-- From nobody Fri Sep 2 08:08:03 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lmap@ietf.org Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED1A12B05E; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 08:08:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "\"IETF Meeting Session Request Tool\"" To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.31.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <147282888223.24884.2167195434114234250.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 08:08:02 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: alissa@cooperw.in, dromasca@gmail.com, lmap-chairs@ietf.org, lmap@ietf.org Subject: [lmap] lmap - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 97 X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 15:08:02 -0000 A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Dan Romascanu, a Chair of the lmap working group. --------------------------------------------------------- Working Group Name: Large-Scale Measurement of Broadband Performance Area Name: Operations and Management Area Session Requester: Dan Romascanu Number of Sessions: 1 Length of Session(s): 1.5 Hours Number of Attendees: 50 Conflicts to Avoid: First Priority: opsawg netconf netmod xrblock i2nsf supa ippm Second Priority: homenet dnssd Special Requests: --------------------------------------------------------- From nobody Wed Sep 14 11:42:02 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC2A12B004 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 11:42:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eBqfpbXdtxjn for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 11:42:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.chartercom.com (mail.chartercom.com [24.176.92.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0140128B44 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 11:41:59 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.30,335,1470718800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="40770051" Received: from unknown (HELO SC58MEXGP008.CORP.CHARTERCOM.com) ([172.24.253.136]) by mail.chartercom.com with ESMTP; 14 Sep 2016 13:38:43 -0500 Received: from SC58MEXGP008.CORP.CHARTERCOM.COM (172.24.253.136) by SC58MEXGP008.CORP.CHARTERCOM.com (172.24.253.136) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 13:41:58 -0500 Received: from SC58MEXGP008.CORP.CHARTERCOM.COM ([fe80::719f:6d16:1ed5:5b5c]) by SC58MEXGP008.CORP.CHARTERCOM.com ([fe80::719f:6d16:1ed5:5b5c%19]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 13:41:58 -0500 From: "Weil, Jason A" To: "lmap@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: LMAP Interim Meeting Announcement Thread-Index: AQHSDresNwH1dLR1/EKpxemm6XwRDQ== Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 18:41:57 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [172.24.253.243] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D3FF12355EF3Bjasonweilchartercom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: [lmap] LMAP Interim Meeting Announcement X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 18:42:01 -0000 --_000_D3FF12355EF3Bjasonweilchartercom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable LMAP, Based on the results of the recent Doodle poll, all respondents showed avai= lability for an October 5th meeting at 0900EST. So the question at hand now is: What is the team's thought on the need for an Interim meeting before Seoul? Thanks, Jason and Dan --_000_D3FF12355EF3Bjasonweilchartercom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
LMAP,

Based on the results of the recent Doodle p= oll, all respondents showed availability for an October 5th meeting at 0900= EST. 

So the question at hand now is: 

What is the team's thought on the nee= d for an Interim meeting before Seoul?


Thanks,
Jason and Dan  
--_000_D3FF12355EF3Bjasonweilchartercom_-- From nobody Wed Sep 14 21:13:25 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5338A12B165 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 21:13:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jDkaD2I22Evp for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 21:13:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qk0-x234.google.com (mail-qk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D96E12B171 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 21:13:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qk0-x234.google.com with SMTP id h8so36059135qka.1 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 21:13:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ffRt8diW6pV054qLVxxV6JJUM/WX2aBU+aaCd532O2A=; b=WepKuM/N6QUtfrxIHt4BmNDgy4Th683SrzAGgQYy94G0Eyf57PAx14jzGqoLsX2Mbt 4xwTpM/2Gipm/6qMgCRG3II9o/IlZ8zZVhfvxpBh/QNL/OnT2ru0XBBXizL4Y5MmrG/i cgE3+D+pVWCN90i3cdzImPioMJEyyGmHAi96sdgDRXAyJOkyY22I21C4+OfWA1XirO5k 4bLO24nruS/OIhtUYDXd7IGdoRJC71KCkt3TWxN7meOg7ya/eRZVfLcqot1hQ4NMRaPn wtuNW2I+UDnB5B02xezjuDdJlnfOM5eWiZ7I5pPB6VnbeG/plJO6hGTpjBnjpDaiQoN/ TZ0A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ffRt8diW6pV054qLVxxV6JJUM/WX2aBU+aaCd532O2A=; b=QGH1IVWhKNcxj1pGmF8ET2ziFkEzQTOURn8h0JPuOGFKLcFV6Zif02M1rWSvuidaTg PRNLt9vN22eKwqwJ6szvXVwLD6bNv3QoASSR0+6THM0MIbxPBqfF6BsQ7J3W/alsGTQi QE5wUnm7FFaim2BTr+GgnUGKvuLJ4s3MxQLwT9OR+6uL4zcHdnV0FDyUZ8+6a5zSr4Pm rZRIdaXcdBuSYpee8eIFejMdLiyOrL2z7bxVD+lJ+HoNLD9P3/XKlkDtcM0G1g+krukK T/XbQetcuT3HGzmg6A3me81MK9wPlnG9Y4liQZ+qw9VzXceWMsR1GbRTTvbM/5xLyGNd g5Cw== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPf/33hadi2gf3r8EPGuZE1c/v916HikEu9Ht4vgA3OGZtcfU62ma49eJYTFGnM+MhD+lmKmGMie8itdg== X-Received: by 10.55.31.85 with SMTP id f82mr7550251qkf.213.1473912799760; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 21:13:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.20.69 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 21:13:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Dan Romascanu Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 07:13:19 +0300 Message-ID: To: "Weil, Jason A" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Archived-At: Cc: "lmap@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [lmap] LMAP Interim Meeting Announcement X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 04:13:23 -0000 Progress depends on contributions. At this point we need more discussion and feedback around the IM document, and we are waiting for an update of the data model, before issuing another WGLC for the two documents. Same applies for new work if we are to consider re-chartering. Internet-Drafts are needed. Regards, Dan On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 9:41 PM, Weil, Jason A wrote: > LMAP, > > Based on the results of the recent Doodle poll, all respondents showed > availability for an October 5th meeting at 0900EST. > > So the question at hand now is: > > What is the team's thought on the need for an Interim meeting before Seoul? > > > Thanks, > Jason and Dan > > _______________________________________________ > lmap mailing list > lmap@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap > From nobody Tue Sep 20 18:31:51 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19ACF12B097 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 18:31:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AjjBHDLwGnM0 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 18:31:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qt0-x236.google.com (mail-qt0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A75812B04C for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 18:31:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qt0-x236.google.com with SMTP id 93so16167222qtg.2 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 18:31:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=JDBnDOelFYDWnwmg6MClel4wKqM7iuyxJm/QJYzTYXs=; b=OrpakKddDKt/OF5bb+vDZuyrTkpCXAWs/afAkby39NoXNNONQ4g9hYDpGgqJXeHNk6 wSnIBNQCMoRQvWVdxTKvF/7fveMT+0Pnm8Bqk745FmrTxJYtKXTuwT4MpoEMvSSmZEYL GkxFOWzVI9c/IgBqzNa/VyRuBp2Vv3IlBnT4ETqhOK4X36FdysKtKeuqNsNRG5KhbXig GUMsLIXuF/QUIhDiVqoHQpwCOvqDi4reJ5BmUw+06RUomMyl7W2/MxE3EEB/J0raLwKu QQng8roDHDlswpeRWMsqCkk5FWvTwEFuczI4MN7PpPRx+ZrQdzPB5qR90NHh3Ryt4qG2 0RzA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=JDBnDOelFYDWnwmg6MClel4wKqM7iuyxJm/QJYzTYXs=; b=XgI/YTGhUUPcecunjAfIDsOQgD0xHYSoh6gOrHNz1PNEnVQzUMhKA/3CCS0HZ2RebG +YSNkSN5T4PHLhGF+DRPVsLZgOHCAM46HLHyeIkJ6t9Qg4NZE2OCRgPHGBfUbgWcmyXa oNrifPPeBxse7ajqHC2o1ApBCUFF8KrNwotIW/UJGLslZc/9egOxJJ8Q9OMyLJIy71Ah j028m+z9x7iL7+m+tr9DZzzzLIs0JiLWixDOl1dwffzCaUc/2AdN4HKcx0K9quRCq177 8fE4n8h7SlTU7r80ezZsSbnyaiAovv2mG3Dl45TwucgT+oV7Y5xc+aFXEGlpxWgnJLMF DCQA== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNWZeEgoGcOlQMP4t+CFAYlTJIw4Ojqt/pt2qJS2Qi/TvAbSQQj+tAh2zUOhigQ/B61Vl90WD589zECLA== X-Received: by 10.200.49.51 with SMTP id g48mr38998723qtb.24.1474421505441; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 18:31:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.38.180 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 18:31:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <147439227471.29069.11843903096227039173.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> References: <147439227471.29069.11843903096227039173.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> From: Dan Romascanu Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 21:31:44 -0400 Message-ID: To: lmap@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1142098614ca5c053cfa8222 Archived-At: Subject: [lmap] Fwd: Reminder from the 2016-2017 NomCom X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 01:31:50 -0000 --001a1142098614ca5c053cfa8222 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >From the NomCom - please consider participating in the process with nominations and feedback on the candidates. Thanks and Regards, Dan ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: NomCom Chair 2016 Date: Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 1:24 PM Subject: Reminder from the 2016-2017 NomCom To: IETF Announcement List Cc: ietf@ietf.org All - A gentle reminder to submit your nominations for the open positions listed below before the October 8, 2016 deadline. We could use additional nominations in all cases but Operations, Transport, and Internet recommendations would be most welcome. Original Announcement: The 2016-17 Nominating Committee (Nomcom) is seeking nominations from now until October 8, 2016. The open positions being considered by this year's Nomcom can be found at the end of this email and also on this year's Nomcom website: https://datatracker.ietf.org/nomcom/2016/ Nominations may be made by selecting the Nominate link at the top of the Nomcom 2016 home page, or by visiting the following URL: https://datatracker.ietf.org/nomcom/2016/nominate/ {Note that nominations made using the web tool require an ietf.org datatracker account. You can create a datatracker ietf.org account if you don't have one already by visiting the following URL: https://datatracker.ietf.org/accounts/create/ } If you are unable to use the web form, nominations may instead be made by email to nomcom-16@ietf.org. If using email, please include the word "Nominate" in the Subject and indicate in the email who is being nominated, their email address (to confirm acceptance of the nomination), and the position for which you are making the nomination. If you are nominating someone other than yourself, please tell us if we may tell the nominee that you were the one who made the nomination. If you wish to nominate someone via email for more than one position, please use separate emails to do so. Self-nomination is welcome! Willing nominees will be asked to fill out a questionnaire specific to the position for which they are nominated. The questionnaires will be available on September 2, 2016 and have a submission deadline of October 13, 2016. NomCom 2016-17 will follow the policy for "Open Disclosure of Willing Nominees" described in BCP 10/RFC 7437. As stated in RFC 7437: "The list of nominees willing to be considered for positions under review in the current Nomcom cycle is not confidential". Willing nominees for each position will be listed in a publicly accessible way - anyone with a datatracker account may access the lists. Additionally, the nomination form asks if we may share your own name with the nominee. In all other ways, the confidentiality requirements of BCP10 remain in effect. All feedback and all Nomcom deliberations will remain confidential and will not be disclosed. There is a field on the form you can mark in order to allow the Nomcom to tell the nominee that you were the one who made the nomination. This defaults to =E2=80=9Cno=E2=80=9D - so if you don't mark th= e field we won=E2=80=99t tell. In order to ensure time to collect sufficient community feedback about each of the willing nominees, nominations must be received by the NomCom on or before October 8, 2016. Please submit your nominations as early as possible for the sake of your nominees. Note that nominations should not wait for management permission, as it is easier to decline the nomination than put one in late. The Nomcom appoints individuals to fill the open slots on the IAOC, the IAB, and the IESG. The list of people and posts whose terms end with the March 2017 IETF meeting, and thus the positions for which this Nomcom is responsible, follows: IAOC Lou Berger IAB Ralph Droms* Russ Housley* Robert Sparks Andrew Sullivan Dave Thaler* Suzanne Woolf IESG Jari Arkko (GEN)* Deborah Brungard (RTG) Ben Campbell (ART) Spencer Dawkins (TSV) Stephen Farrell (SEC)* Joel Jaeggli (OPS)* Terry Manderson (INT) Alvaro Retana (RTG) *- have indicated that they do not intend to accept a renomination. This information is always up to date on https://datatracker.ietf.org/nomcom/2016/ Please be resourceful in identifying possible candidates for these positions, as developing our talent is a very crucial requirement for the IETF, and also, please consider accepting a nomination. You'll find extensive information about specific positions, developed by the IAB, IESG, and IAOC, under individual tabs at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/nomcom/2016/requirements/ In addition to nominations, the Nomcom seeks community input on the positions themselves. We need and welcome the community's views and input on the jobs within each organization. If you have ideas on the positions' responsibilities (more, less, different), please let us know. Please send suggestions and feedback about this to nomcom-16@ietf.org. Thank you for your help in identifying qualified nominees! Lucy Lynch Nomcom Chair 2016-17 nomcom-chair-2016@ietf.org llynch@civil-tongue.net --001a1142098614ca5c053cfa8222 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From the NomCom - please consider participating = in the process with nominations and feedback on the candidates.

Thanks and Regards,

Dan

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: NomCom Chair 2016 <nomcom-chair-2016@ietf.org><= br>Date: Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 1:24 PM
Subject: Reminder from the 2016-20= 17 NomCom
To: IETF Announcement List <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org


All -

A gentle reminder to submit your nominations for the open positions
listed below before the October 8, 2016 deadline.

We could use additional nominations in all cases but Operations,
Transport, and Internet recommendations would be most welcome.

Original Announcement:

The 2016-17 Nominating Committee (Nomcom) is seeking nominations from
now until October 8, 2016. The open positions being considered by this
year's Nomcom can be found at the end of this email and also on this year's Nomcom website:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/nomcom/2016/

Nominations may be made by selecting the Nominate link at the top of
the Nomcom 2016 home page, or by visiting the following URL:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/nomcom/2016/nomi= nate/

=C2=A0 {Note that nominations made using the web tool require an ietf.org
=C2=A0 =C2=A0datatracker account. You can create a datatracker ietf.org account =C2=A0 =C2=A0if you don't have one already by visiting the following UR= L:
=C2=A0 =C2=A0https://datatracker.ietf.org/account= s/create/ }

If you are unable to use the web form, nominations may instead be made
by email to nomcom-16@ietf.org. I= f using email, please include the word
"Nominate" in the Subject and indicate in the email who is being<= br> nominated, their email address (to confirm acceptance of the
nomination), and the position for which you are making the nomination.
If you are nominating someone other than yourself, please tell us if
we may tell the nominee that you were the one who made the nomination.
If you wish to nominate someone via email for more than one position,
please use separate emails to do so.

Self-nomination is welcome!

Willing nominees will be asked to fill out a questionnaire
specific to the position for which they are nominated.=C2=A0 The questionna= ires
will be available on September 2, 2016 and have a submission deadline of October 13, 2016.

NomCom 2016-17 will follow the policy for "Open Disclosure of Willing<= br> Nominees" described in BCP 10/RFC 7437.=C2=A0 As stated in RFC 7437: &= quot;The
list of nominees willing to be considered for positions under review
in the current Nomcom cycle is not confidential". Willing nominees for=
each position will be listed in a publicly accessible way - anyone
with a datatracker account may access the lists.=C2=A0 Additionally, the nomination form asks if we may share your own name with the
nominee. In all other ways, the confidentiality requirements of BCP10
remain in effect.=C2=A0 All feedback and all Nomcom deliberations will
remain confidential and will not be disclosed.

There is a field on the form you can mark in order to allow the Nomcom
to tell the nominee that you were the one who made the
nomination. This defaults to =E2=80=9Cno=E2=80=9D - so if you don't mar= k the field
we won=E2=80=99t tell.

In order to ensure time to collect sufficient community feedback about
each of the willing nominees, nominations must be received by the
NomCom on or before October 8, 2016.

Please submit your nominations as early as possible for the sake of
your nominees. Note that nominations should not wait for management
permission, as it is easier to decline the nomination than put one in
late.

The Nomcom appoints individuals to fill the open slots on the IAOC,
the IAB, and the IESG. The list of people and posts whose terms end
with the March 2017 IETF meeting, and thus the positions for which
this Nomcom is responsible, follows:

IAOC

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Lou Berger

IAB

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Ralph Droms*
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Russ Housley*
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Robert Sparks
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Andrew Sullivan
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Dave Thaler*
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Suzanne Woolf

IESG

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Jari Arkko (GEN)*
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Deborah Brungard (RTG)
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Ben Campbell (ART)
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Spencer Dawkins (TSV)
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Stephen Farrell (SEC)*
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Joel Jaeggli (OPS)*
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Terry Manderson (INT)
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Alvaro Retana (RTG)

*- have indicated that they do not intend to accept a
renomination. This information is always up to date on
https://datatracker.ietf.org/nomcom/2016/

Please be resourceful in identifying possible candidates for these
positions, as developing our talent is a very crucial requirement for
the IETF, and also, please consider accepting a nomination.=C2=A0 You'l= l
find extensive information about specific positions, developed by the
IAB, IESG, and IAOC, under individual tabs at:

=C2=A0 https://datatracker.ietf.org/nomco= m/2016/requirements/

In addition to nominations, the Nomcom seeks community input on the
positions themselves.=C2=A0 We need and welcome the community's views a= nd
input on the jobs within each organization. If you have ideas on the
positions' responsibilities (more, less, different), please let us
know.

Please send suggestions and feedback about this to nomcom-16@ietf.org.

Thank you for your help in identifying qualified nominees!

Lucy Lynch
Nomcom Chair 2016-17
nomcom-chair-2016@ietf.org
llynch@civil-tongue.net


--001a1142098614ca5c053cfa8222-- From nobody Fri Sep 23 07:35:44 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB9B12BCD5 for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 07:35:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yWVQEPm36u7U for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 07:35:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qk0-x231.google.com (mail-qk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 292DA12BCC4 for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 07:35:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qk0-x231.google.com with SMTP id t7so107406029qkh.2 for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 07:35:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=fZT2jYC9BTnoPpozwTq4Uowl3ub5YBvLyrl5cV1crjw=; b=tsRveGN4IhdOGy08zKUPME3gutVPBV8epx7cK6tCecQXJdWV60DOfOLs9/2vutBFsJ YBiSIoXh6f4SUBSrlJwS7UeEeGRFmFz12c+VXBk8XMeSfURsfKgpMfjW7juJDbocWNIy pEmnzlxid5EoBdXzbeu9oN/ztTrfG4Ko7ploiyXV1AA7AwqZcGxq0/LuOEAtBcX4PBsq V7H9a7if059j44HTArfkZITreSpX+8M4bR+9hDGHJppMz+Vl2cAUv+DNqE967JL2TVP6 f8VInGU0N77CUOiyMTHKzHEXfzeV7Z4lSzfRlkqtpu3AZkX+F4qY8Abr784z0nPmaTw5 u9jg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=fZT2jYC9BTnoPpozwTq4Uowl3ub5YBvLyrl5cV1crjw=; b=Qt5aR7QnD/BLy1iJ61eIMGEFbl39SVGZHQsK6USRFcExvgVODfaJQQwNy8nEqvVNdV pY8lUnQdhY6FHWO5H5en7X9RKD6KSz14Ozd7Aoz0YbELZWnnk7nIZrS65zPsuAWXakNm djmroUkPZgR66R/24NiYP4nUuiq5iEALtsxhJPG/ldHpz4qVnfxlnohEOPTx0cUYHBN4 ViVY9LtsRLj4anTAEKcLgHTJwB/+ipI/aOI/8Ds0TBr07IPKNdtSTPWhlDCvV1qen4Zl nDfKExnKLBISg1gOpUIL/sirLOtZCo5pQHxYMihXYIUzMGhhi7DFr2O5ECs23/65c6PO /BsQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rl8aSO7zL3gkzSkqN/ldXESiYL8b3h8h7y40HgdYQJlU2wJhMZlrvhQe4oxSUSsLb/SbuSa0jYYdD1x8w== X-Received: by 10.55.163.196 with SMTP id m187mr7983117qke.40.1474641339054; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 07:35:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.38.180 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 07:35:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Dan Romascanu Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 07:35:38 -0700 Message-ID: To: lmap@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c05ecb62f839c053d2db140 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [lmap] LMAP Interim Meeting Announcement X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 14:35:43 -0000 --94eb2c05ecb62f839c053d2db140 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 There was no response to this query about the virtual interim meeting and next steps! Please respond to the following: - provide feedback to draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-11.txt and let us know if you believe it is ready for WGLC - is there a need for a virtual interim before IETF 97? - do you have any proposals for new work or older proposals that you would like to be resuscitated for a future re-chartering? Function of the responses and contributions we can decide if we keep the meeting at IETF 97, or release the agenda slot. As previously stated. progress depends on contributions. Thanks and Regards, Dan On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Dan Romascanu wrote: > Progress depends on contributions. At this point we need more > discussion and feedback around the IM document, and we are waiting for > an update of the data model, before issuing another WGLC for the two > documents. > > Same applies for new work if we are to consider re-chartering. > Internet-Drafts are needed. > > Regards, > > Dan > > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 9:41 PM, Weil, Jason A > wrote: > > LMAP, > > > > Based on the results of the recent Doodle poll, all respondents showed > > availability for an October 5th meeting at 0900EST. > > > > So the question at hand now is: > > > > What is the team's thought on the need for an Interim meeting before > Seoul? > > > > > > Thanks, > > Jason and Dan > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lmap mailing list > > lmap@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap > > > --94eb2c05ecb62f839c053d2db140 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
There was no = response to this query about the virtual interim meeting and next steps!
Please respond to the following:

- provide feedbac= k to draft-ietf-lmap-information-model-11.txt and let us know if you believ= e it is ready for WGLC
- is there a need for a virtual interim bef= ore IETF 97?
- do you have any proposals for new work or older pr= oposals that you would like to be resuscitated for a future re-chartering? =

Function of the responses and contributions we can deci= de if we keep the meeting at IETF 97, or release the agenda slot.

<= /div>As previously stated. progress depends on contributions.

Thanks and Regards,

Dan




On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail= .com> wrote:
Progress depends on contributions. At this point we need more
discussion and feedback around the IM document, and we are waiting for
an update of the data model, before issuing another WGLC for the two
documents.

Same applies for new work if we are to consider re-chartering.
Internet-Drafts are needed.

Regards,

Dan


On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 9:41 PM, Weil, Jason A <Jason.Weil@charter.com> wrote:
> LMAP,
>
> Based on the results of the recent Doodle poll, all respondents showed=
> availability for an October 5th meeting at 0900EST.
>
> So the question at hand now is:
>
> What is the team's thought on the need for an Interim meeting befo= re Seoul?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Jason and Dan
>
> _______________________________________________
> lmap mailing list
> lmap@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lmap >

--94eb2c05ecb62f839c053d2db140-- From nobody Tue Sep 27 14:24:39 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3638E12B215 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 14:24:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.921 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=viavisolutions.onmicrosoft.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ilynOqFgvHJy for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 14:24:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from NAM01-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam01on0112.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.34.112]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89F4B12B011 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 14:24:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=viavisolutions.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-viavisolutions-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=IZ2rghqvy8HclGkaU+r9Sw8LTws1p+fmdTgeHEFUAIY=; b=vWICziGzl/eoTfdlnYiJ7so1xVnHq6tls3OqwqvA4sz5V4W0okGDabcw5lzyA9MJu399gS3Vs30TcGsoZHytU8KVDJp2spv6GwB0fQSZlyCM4jtcP3G4LT9adTqwQP1F0OT48GCNAWHcsWTnVVBQJItEM+c7Ixz0lBCa7KTVB/w= Received: from MWHPR18MB0960.namprd18.prod.outlook.com (10.173.123.14) by MWHPR18MB0958.namprd18.prod.outlook.com (10.173.123.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.639.5; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 21:24:34 +0000 Received: from MWHPR18MB0960.namprd18.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.123.14]) by MWHPR18MB0960.namprd18.prod.outlook.com ([10.173.123.14]) with mapi id 15.01.0639.013; Tue, 27 Sep 2016 21:24:34 +0000 From: Ron Stana To: "lmap@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Data type for Option/Value Thread-Index: AdIZBW2IFf380fCHS4+nER0bBjX6mA== Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 21:24:34 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Ron.Stana@viavisolutions.com; x-originating-ip: [104.129.194.54] x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: cac4a7d8-9c88-4f0d-ca03-08d3e71cad74 x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; MWHPR18MB0958; 6:wDAFkCcgZ8HvSdLoxdb1SjIKcV0M13BBCOFfqWaEncvRxspYMZriYf248zd1Kr8RorQHfqMAzoTAmh7EpYyBKhCld9EgrDvVldswrKxgiyTdJ5XM7hCXqPpK1AiCtWDgMpzfRcjRUpA83mIdF4ghHJ5k+IKX1OeJ0rvq72SdCuuXJbVUnLrv+0z11UDwAYoaPRbi0cILzELW1iaR+ZCNHb8NAotpocX0434FzKAwZnbjvZuj+D0tUawA8pnGbuzUsfSocbl1tu/R0B7fzpCIlpPnvigBQg5h8OHwuHXq1J257UUT84R58OPZmAA4A/HUTDfMbuHwJZzfbQGxBxZRAA==; 5:DrvQRvkR1RQGEuMcjlp/jl1f9rJUBCc6cu/CRXJK10qbV+mqdkGq5yEz/NS6mPAS/NQ9vBtlasCpIeW8DgREFoXKJ86jp7oip0If6wWgREoT3SXUYN8C/1wE9eC8KKRADK7T4yYbFyZ0JuMNx/WmFA==; 24:z5K/s8h9sAKLesb22Gh4vMdNbtsU9UoB93ESI3nzgnfWeFujrkrcThSbueFtFzoFM9EA0h3DoqrS8OSa8GExbvctVvoqAharPU+dFMAULgc=; 7:9uMxDbw0o46IRPROQocpkmXKMnBGkvFNvvShoqOxeyhGVjTAhA/6APfTxUCMHF5bj1LyUEAgnElu+sAWmuqIBu3jJkx1TGCUewwsNnTNmU40AkmR6R00uNviTXK5sFohtsWWuAa3GrUN6A3Bipl+D3Sg/x6rNGHaKstBpEk0efUHD8wZzfliapkUQJLCwmieg4cTEuZKnaehydr5RCIYETAw/HqFBfRrNDI6e62Vq3D45ZciFUGb4F/YeulBprS9YCeGCCsWi2fI9FPaTjFTrPK8rmV//KDs9UpFfleuftNTyyR7JNl7Ii36hhkcTwBY x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:MWHPR18MB0958; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(21748063052155); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040176)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026); SRVR:MWHPR18MB0958; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:MWHPR18MB0958; x-forefront-prvs: 007814487B x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(189002)(199003)(8936002)(101416001)(122556002)(19625215002)(33656002)(74316002)(16236675004)(110136003)(97736004)(86362001)(106356001)(77096005)(76576001)(4326007)(2900100001)(3846002)(7696004)(92566002)(6116002)(2906002)(5002640100001)(15975445007)(189998001)(54356999)(102836003)(5630700001)(5660300001)(5640700001)(790700001)(11100500001)(68736007)(50986999)(66066001)(3660700001)(105586002)(99286002)(9686002)(2501003)(81166006)(7846002)(8676002)(19580395003)(229853001)(81156014)(6916009)(19300405004)(3280700002)(87936001)(1730700003)(10400500002)(7736002)(2351001)(586003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:MWHPR18MB0958; H:MWHPR18MB0960.namprd18.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: viavisolutions.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MWHPR18MB096078AD85087A46F0F7BF258ACC0MWHPR18MB0960namp_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: viavisolutions.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 27 Sep 2016 21:24:34.3673 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: c44ec86f-d007-4b6c-8795-8ea75e4a6f9b X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MWHPR18MB0958 Archived-At: Cc: "alissa@cooperw.in" Subject: [lmap] Data type for Option/Value X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 21:24:38 -0000 --_000_MWHPR18MB096078AD85087A46F0F7BF258ACC0MWHPR18MB0960namp_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable LMAP Team, The data type for the option/value in the LMAP YANG model is currently defi= ned as a string. Our tests use a structured set of input parameters, somet= imes mandated by IETF YANG models such as TWAMP and TWAMP Light (see exampl= e below) so we currently have to stringify the data which makes it unnecess= arily hard to read and requires an extra step before sending and parsing. "action":[ { "name":"Test-2016-09-27-16:54-action", "task":"twamp-initiator", "option":[ { "id":"twamp-light", "value":"{\"ietf-twamp-light:twamp-light\":{\"twamp-lig= ht-session-sender\":{\"sender-light-enable\":true,\"test-session\":[{\"sess= ion-id\":1,\"test-session-enable\":true,\"packet-padding-size\":425,\"sessi= on-authentication-mode\":\"unauthenticated\",\"interval\":10,\"sender-ip\":= \"192.168.2.10\",\"sender-udp-port\":50000,\"reflector-ip\":\"192.168.2.20\= ",\"reflector-udp-port\":50000,\"dscp\":0},{\"session-id\":2,\"test-session= -enable\":true,\"packet-padding-size\":41,\"session-authentication-mode\":\= "unauthenticated\",\"interval\":20,\"sender-ip\":\"192.168.2.10\",\"sender-= udp-port\":50000,\"reflector-ip\":\"192.168.2.20\",\"reflector-udp-port\":5= 0000,\"dscp\":8}]}}}" } ], "destination":[ "Test-2016-09-27-16:54-results-periodic-pm", "Test-2016-09-27-16:54-results-periodic-rt" ] } ] Can the value object be changed in the LMAP YANG model so that it can conta= in another object (i.e. YANG's anyxml object type)? Regards, Ron --_000_MWHPR18MB096078AD85087A46F0F7BF258ACC0MWHPR18MB0960namp_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

LMAP Team,

 

The data type for the option/value in the LMAP YA= NG model is currently defined as a string.  Our tests use a structured= set of input parameters, sometimes mandated by IETF YANG models such as TW= AMP and TWAMP Light (see example below) so we currently have to stringify the data which makes it unnecessarily ha= rd to read and requires an extra step before sending and parsing.

 

"action":[ 

   { 

      "name&qu= ot;:"Test-2016-09-27-16:54-action",

      "task":&= quot;twamp-initiator",

      "option"= :[ 

        &= nbsp;        { 

        &= nbsp;           "id&= quot;:"twamp-light",

        &= nbsp;           "value&qu= ot;:"{\"ietf-twamp-light:twamp-light\":{\"twamp-light-s= ession-sender\":{\"sender-light-enable\":true,\"test-se= ssion\":[{\"session-id\":1,\"test-session-enable\"= :true,\"packet-padding-size\":425,\"session-authentication-m= ode\":\"unauthenticated\",\"interval\":10,\"s= ender-ip\":\"192.168.2.10\",\"sender-udp-port\":50= 000,\"reflector-ip\":\"192.168.2.20\",\"reflector-= udp-port\":50000,\"dscp\":0},{\"session-id\":2,\&q= uot;test-session-enable\":true,\"packet-padding-size\":41,\&= quot;session-authentication-mode\":\"unauthenticated\",\&quo= t;interval\":20,\"sender-ip\":\"192.168.2.10\",\&q= uot;sender-udp-port\":50000,\"reflector-ip\":\"192.168.= 2.20\",\"reflector-udp-port\":50000,\"dscp\":8}]}}= }"

        &= nbsp;       }

      ],

      "destination&= quot;:[ 

        &= nbsp;        "Test-2016-09-27-16:54= -results-periodic-pm",

        &= nbsp;       "Test-2016-09-27-16:54-resul= ts-periodic-rt"

      ]

   }

]

 

Can the value object = be changed in the LMAP YANG model so that it can contain another object (i.= e. YANG's anyxml object type)? 

 

Regards,
Ron

 

--_000_MWHPR18MB096078AD85087A46F0F7BF258ACC0MWHPR18MB0960namp_-- From nobody Wed Sep 28 07:58:04 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: lmap@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B15212B193 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 07:58:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.92 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1uHwPDX6Ili8 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 07:58:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-us.alcatel-lucent.com (us-hpswa-esg-01.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.18.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B11812B0D5 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 07:58:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from us70uumx3.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.245.18.15]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 5C808798BF50 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 14:57:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from us70uusmtp3.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (us70uusmtp3.zam.alcatel-lucent.com [135.5.2.65]) by us70uumx3.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id u8SEvxPK012540 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 14:58:00 GMT Received: from US70TWXCHHUB03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (us70twxchhub03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com [135.5.2.35]) by us70uusmtp3.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id u8SEvw9D008555 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 14:57:59 GMT Received: from US70UWXCHMBA05.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.10.124]) by US70TWXCHHUB03.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.5.2.35]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Wed, 28 Sep 2016 10:57:59 -0400 From: "Carey, Timothy (Nokia - US)" To: "lmap@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Re: [lmap] LMAP Interim Meeting Announcement Thread-Index: AdIZmLMjKAenaKqNRxOn1365dgDiQA== Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 14:57:58 +0000 Message-ID: <9966516C6EB5FC4381E05BF80AA55F77012A782B8C@US70UWXCHMBA05.zam.alcatel-lucent.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.5.27.16] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9966516C6EB5FC4381E05BF80AA55F77012A782B8CUS70UWXCHMBA0_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [lmap] LMAP Interim Meeting Announcement X-BeenThere: lmap@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 14:58:03 -0000 --_000_9966516C6EB5FC4381E05BF80AA55F77012A782B8CUS70UWXCHMBA0_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dan, I don't have any outstanding issues using the LMAP information revision 11 = for the development of the TR-069 data model in the BBF. As such I do not have anything to contribute to an interim meeting nor the = next plenary unless of course a new IM revision is done. BR, Tim --_000_9966516C6EB5FC4381E05BF80AA55F77012A782B8CUS70UWXCHMBA0_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dan,

 

I don’t have any outstanding issues using the = LMAP information revision 11 for the development of the TR-069 data model i= n the BBF.

As such I do not have anything to contribute to an i= nterim meeting nor the next plenary unless of course a new IM revision is d= one.

 

BR,

Tim

--_000_9966516C6EB5FC4381E05BF80AA55F77012A782B8CUS70UWXCHMBA0_--