Subject: RE: Document submitted for draft-ietf-ltans-notareq-01.txt

From: Peter Sylvester <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 19:01:55 +0200 (MEST)

> 
> If we keep these use cases, can you think of other alternatives?
> 

We can add a text in the requirement saying that we have to find a good
name for the protocol and a text:

The protocol should be called 'xyz' because of this and that
reason. (which can be repeated in the introductions).