Subject: Re: Session Description Protocol draft available.

From: Mark Handley <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 95 11:28:51 +0100

>[...]
>> > - Using URLs for media tool descriptions.  eg: audio://224.2.0.1:3456/pcm
>> > 
>> >   (maybe this wasn't what you meant, but it's an extension of the above)
>> > 
>> 
>> Minor quick observation:
>> 
>> In my opinion, the URL may look like this instead,
>> 
>> 	sdp://224.2.0.1:3456/pcm
>> or
>> 	rtp://224.2.0.1:3456/pcm
>> ....
>> right ?!
>> 
>> It's a simple syntax in some way but i agree with Mark, it's overloading 
>> the URL syntax.
>
>Ummm, hmmm, there are 3 parts to an address as used by sd...the IP#, the
>port and ID.  Shouldn't all three of these be represented in the URL or
>is the ID not actually needed ?

For rtp, id is obsolete.  vat still uses it though.

Mark