Subject: [NEXTEL-1] FCC DocketComments filed by New York State: Spectrum Policy TaskForce Report, Solicitation of Public Comments - ET Docket 02-135

From: Marcel <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 14:56:58 -0500

------ Original Message --------
   From: Robert Schlieman <[email-masked]>
Subject:  FCC DocketComments filed by New York State: Spectrum Policy TaskForce Report,
         Solicitation of Public Comments - ET Docket 02-135
       :

New York State posted the attached comments to the FCC ECFS yesterday.

We also tried to make the increased interference noise floor and increased mandatory
coverage thresholds points in conference call discussions leading to the December 24,
2002,  "Consensus" Coalition supplemental filing, but they were not included in that
document.

While interference limited designs work well for cellular type "one-to-one" communication
systems, they do not work well, financially and from a spectrum efficiency point of view,
for public safety systems.  Which, is why these different technologies should be
adequately separated from each other in the radio spectrum.  The attached document
explains this in a clear manner.
Regards,

Bob
------------------------
Robert F. Schlieman
Project Manager - Engineering
Statewide Wireless Network
New York State Office for Technology

Mail to:     State Capitol, ESP
                 P.O. Box 2062
                 Albany, New York 12220-0062

Physical address for
Shipments and FedEx, etc. to:     74 North Pearl Street
                                                   2nd Floor
                                                   Albany, New York 12207-2721

Main Telephone: (518) 443-2041
Direct Telephone: (518) 443-2227
Cell Phone: (518) 461-3280
E-Fax (preferred) (707) 929-7647
FAX: (518) 443-2787
E-mail: [email-masked]
        [email-masked]

----------------------------

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/